Effects of different fertilizer formulations of agricultural wastes on growth, yield and quality of cabbage

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20221098

Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis ›› 2023, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (8): 1782-1792.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20221098

• Horticultural Science • Previous Articles Next Articles

Effects of different fertilizer formulations of agricultural wastes on growth, yield and quality of cabbage

ZHANG Bo¹(), LIU Zeci¹^,^*(), WANG Jie¹, LI Zhaozhuang¹, LI Lushan¹, HU Linli¹, YU Jihua¹^,²^,^*()

1. College of Horticulture, Gansu Agricultural University,Lanzhou 730070,China
2. Gansu Provincial Key Laboratory of Arid Land Crop Science, Lanzhou 730070, China

Received:2022-07-25 Online:2023-08-25 Published:2023-08-29

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to investigate the effects of different fertilizer formulations of agricultural waste on the growth, yield and quality of cabbage, nine different organic fertilizer formulations of sheep manure, vegetable residue, cow manure, mushroom residue and corn straw were prepared according to different mass ratios. T1 (sheep manure∶cabbage vegetable residue with volume ratio of 5.5∶4.5), T2 (sheep manure∶vegetable residue∶cow manure with volume ratio of 6∶3∶1), T3 (sheep manure∶cabbage vegetable residue∶mushroom residue with volume ratio of 6∶3∶1), T4 (sheep manure∶cabbage vegetable residue∶cow manure∶mushroom residue with volume ratio of 6∶3∶1), T5 (sheep manure∶ cabbage vegetable residue∶cow manure: mushroom residue with volume ratio of 6∶2∶1∶1), T6 (sheep manure∶cabbage vegetable residue∶cow manure∶corn straw with volume ratio of 6∶2∶1∶1), T7 (sheep manure∶cabbage vegetable residue∶mushroom residue∶corn straw with volume ratio of 6∶2∶2∶1), T8 (sheep manure∶cabbage vegetable residue∶cow manure∶mushroom residue∶corn straw with volume ratio of 5∶2∶1∶1∶1). CK1 (no application of organic fertilizer) and local commodity organic fertilizer formula CK2 (sheep manure∶cabbage vegetable residue=6.5∶3.5) were served as the control groups. In order to provide basis for fertilizer utilization of agricultural waste, the differences of growth, yield and quality of cabbage under different organic fertilizer cultivation conditions were investigated. The results showed that in T6 treatment, the projection area of open field cabbage was higher than that of other treatments at the pelleting stage and harvesting stage, the plant height at the pelleting stage was higher than that of other treatments, and the maximum leaf area at the pelleting stage and harvesting stage was higher than that of other treatments. The root activity at cabbage rosette stage in T6 treatment was significantly higher than other growth stages. Compared with CK2 treatment, the biomass yield and dry matter accumulation in T6 treatment increased by 7.18% and 55.99%, respectively. The contents of soluble sugar and vitamin C in T6 treatment were higher than those in other organic fertilizer treatments. The nitrate content was lower than that of other organic fertilizer treatments. Compared with CK1, the content of mineral elements in each treatment increased to different degrees. The membership function analysis of 17 indexes showed that T6 was the best treatment, followed by T4>T3>T8>T7>T1>CK2>T2>T5>CK1.

Key words: cabbage, fertilizer of agricultural waste, production, quality, comprehensive analysis

CLC Number:

S635

ZHANG Bo, LIU Zeci, WANG Jie, LI Zhaozhuang, LI Lushan, HU Linli, YU Jihua. Effects of different fertilizer formulations of agricultural wastes on growth, yield and quality of cabbage[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(8): 1782-1792.

Figures/Tables 10

References 36

[1]	陶秀萍, 董红敏. 畜禽废弃物无害化处理与资源化利用技术研究进展[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2017, 19(1): 37-42.
	TAO X P, DONG H M. Research progress on animal waste treatment and recycling technology[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2017, 19(1): 37-42. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]	宋志伟, 王晶, 朱旭丽, 等. 秸秆资源综合利用现状及展望[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2017, 45(7): 64-66, 162.
	SONG Z W, WANG J, ZHU X L, et al. Present research status and prospects of the comprehensive utilization of straw resources[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 45(7): 64-66, 162. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]	武淑霞, 刘宏斌, 刘申, 等. 农业面源污染现状及防控技术[J]. 中国工程科学, 2018, 20(5): 23-30.
	WU S X, LIU H B, LIU S, et al. Review of current situation of agricultural non-point source pollution and its prevention and control technologies[J]. Strategic Study of CAE, 2018, 20(5): 23-30. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]	李鹏, 王文杰. 我国农业废弃物资源的利用现状及开发前景[J]. 天津农业科学, 2009, 15(3): 46-49.
	LI P, WANG W J. Utilization status and prospect of agricultural wastes in China[J]. Tianjin Agricultural Sciences, 2009, 15(3): 46-49. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]	董雪云, 张金流, 郭鹏飞. 农业固体废弃物资源化利用技术研究进展及展望[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2014, 20(18): 86-89.
	DONG X Y, ZHANG J L, GUO P F. Research progress and prospect in resource utilization technology of agricultural solid waste[J]. Anhui Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2014, 20(18): 86-89. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]	刘长莉, 魏利, 黄剑. 农业有机废弃物资源化利用[M]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学出版社, 2010.
[7]	王长波, 平英华, 刘先才, 等. 我国秸秆资源“五化”利用研究进展[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2018, 46(7): 22-26, 29.
	WANG C B, PING Y H, LIU X C, et al. Research progress of the five ways of straw utilization in China[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 46(7): 22-26, 29. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	李龙涛, 李万明, 孙继民, 等. 城乡有机废弃物资源化利用现状及展望[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2019, 36(3): 264-271.
	LI L T, LI W M, SUN J M, et al. Research status and prospects of the resource utilization of organic waste in urban and rural areas[J]. Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environment, 2019, 36(3): 264-271. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	李国学, 李玉春, 李彦富. 固体废物堆肥化及堆肥添加剂研究进展[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2003, 22(2): 252-256.
	LI G X, LI Y C, LI Y F. Advance on composting of solid waste and utilization of additives[J]. Journal of Agro-Environmental Science, 2003, 22(2): 252-256. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]	李剑. 蔬菜废弃物堆肥技术参数的优化研究[D]. 上海: 上海交通大学, 2011.
	LI J. Study on optimizational technique of vegetable waste compost[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2011. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]	张修顺. 蔬菜废弃物肥料化处理研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2019.
	ZHANG X S. Study on fertilization treatment of vegetable waste[D]. Yangling: Northwest A & F University, 2019. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]	方智远, 张扬勇, 刘玉梅, 等. 高山(高原)夏菜中的甘蓝[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2010(19): 12-13.
	FANG Z Y, ZHANG Y Y, LIU Y M, et al. Cabbage in summer vegetable in alpine (plateau)[J]. China Vegetables, 2010(19): 12-13. (in Chinese)
[13]	鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法[M]. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 2000.
[14]	高俊凤. 植物生理学实验指导[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2006.
[15]	刘玉英, 罗云米, 李戎, 等. 有机无机肥施用对结球甘蓝形态、产量及品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2016, 32(4): 44-47.
	LIU Y Y, LUO Y M, LI R, et al. Effects of organic and inorganic fertilizer on cabbage morphology, yield and quality[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2016, 32(4): 44-47. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]	汪新胜, 陆玲, 李拥军, 等. 有机肥与化肥配施对结球甘蓝生长特性、产量及品质的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2018, 57(7): 22-24.
	WANG X S, LU L, LI Y J, et al. Effects of combined application of organic manure and chemical fertilizer on growth, yield and quality of the cabbage[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 57(7): 22-24. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]	崔正勇, 李新华, 裴艳婷, 等. 氮磷配施对冬小麦干物质积累、分配及产量的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2018, 27(3): 339-346.
	CUI Z Y, LI X H, PEI Y T, et al. Effects of nitrogen-phosphorus-combined application on characteristics of dry matter accumulation, distribution and yield of winter wheat[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Occidentalis Sinica, 2018, 27(3): 339-346. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]	柳燕兰, 郭贤仕, 张绪成, 等. 密度和施肥对旱地马铃薯干物质积累、产量和水肥利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(2): 320-331.
	LIU Y L, GUO X S, ZHANG X C, et al. Effects of planting density and fertilization on dry matter accumulation, yield and water-fertilizer utilization of dryland potato[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(2): 320-331. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]	朱明霞, 白婷, 靳玉龙, 等. 施肥对春青稞干物质积累、分配及产量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(25): 7-13.
	ZHU M X, BAI T, JIN Y L, et al. Fertilization: effects on dry matter accumulation, distribution and yield of spring hulless barley[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(25): 7-13. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]	包奇军, 潘永东, 张华瑜, 等. 减量施肥对啤酒大麦干物质积累、产量及肥料利用率的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(8): 149-158.
	BAO Q J, PAN Y D, ZHANG H Y, et al. Effect of reducing fertilizer application on dry matter accumulation, yield and fertilizer utilization efficiency of beer barely[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(8): 149-158. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]	王晓玲. 不同培肥措施对复垦土壤肥力及玉米生长的影响[D]. 太谷: 山西农业大学, 2014.
	WANG X L. Effects of different fertilization on fertility of reclaimed soil and corn growth[D]. Taigu: Shanxi Agricultural University, 2014. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[22]	朱秀云, 梁梦, 马玉. 根系活力的测定(TTC法)实验综述报告[J]. 广东化工, 2020, 47(6): 211-212.
	ZHU X Y, LIANG M, MA Y. A review report on the experiments for the determination of root activity by TTC method[J]. Guangdong Chemical Industry, 2020, 47(6): 211-212. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]	郭士伟, 夏士健, 朱虹霞, 等. 水稻根系活力测定方法及超级稻两优培九生育后期根系活力研究[J]. 土壤, 2012, 44(2): 308-311.
	GUO S W, XIA S J, ZHU H X, et al. Factors influencing collecting amount of rice roots bleeding and investigation on roots vigor after heading[J]. Soils, 2012, 44(2): 308-311. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24]	赵欣宇. 不同农业有机废弃物对黑土理化性质及腐殖化特征的影响[D]. 长春: 吉林农业大学, 2016.
	ZHAO X Y. Effects of different agriculture organic wastes on physicochemical property and humification of black soil[D]. Changchun: Jilin Agricultural University, 2016. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25]	王保平, 周静, 史向远, 等. 不同农业废弃物复合基质对西瓜光合特性、产量和品质的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2021, 50(6): 116-124.
	WANG B P, ZHOU J, SHI X Y, et al. Effects of different agricultural waste compound substrates on photosynthetic characteristics, yield and quality of watermelon[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 50(6): 116-124. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26]	韩丽娜, 丁哲利, 曾会才, 等. 功能性有机肥对大白菜生长的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2016, 28(10): 1718-1723.
	HAN L N, DING Z L, ZENG H C, et al. Effect of functional organic fertilizer on growth of Chinese cabbage[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2016, 28(10): 1718-1723. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[27]	LI S X, SHEN Q R, ZHENG X Q, et al. Effect of organic microbe fertilizer application on watermelon growth and soil microorganisms under continuous mono-cropping[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2012, 20(2): 169-174.
[28]	TENG G X, QIU H Z, ZHANG C H, et al. Effect of microbial organic fertilizer on seedling growth, yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2012, 19(6): 1255-1260.
[29]	杜莹, 黄兴学, 周国林, 等. 轮作和有机肥对连作小白菜生长及土壤微生物特性的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2016, 55(24): 6498-6503.
	DU Y, HUANG X X, ZHOU G L, et al. Effects of rotation and organic fertilizer on the growth of Brassica campestris ssp. chinensis var. communis and soil microbial characteristics of continuous cropping soil[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 55(24): 6498-6503. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[30]	史晓君. 农业废弃物制备生物有机肥及其在小白菜上的应用[J]. 河南农业, 2020(2): 16-17.
	SHI X J. Preparation of bio-organic fertilizer from agricultural waste and its application in Chinese cabbage[J]. Henan Nongye, 2020(2):16-17. (in Chinese)
[31]	陆景陵. 植物营养学(上册)[M]. 北京: 中国农业大学出版社,1994.
[32]	王凡. 长期秸秆还田及施用粪肥对小麦产量和矿质营养品质及重金属的影响[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2016.
	WANG F. Responses of wheat yield, quality and heavy metals to longterm straw returning and manure compost application[D]. Yangling: Northwest A & F University, 2016. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[33]	LI B Y, ZHOU D M, CANG L, et al. Soil micronutrient availability to crops as affected by long-term inorganic and organic fertilizer applications[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2007, 96(1/2): 166-173.
[34]	RUTKOWSKA B, SZULC W, SOSULSKI T, et al. Soil micronutrient availability to crops affected by long-term inorganic and organic fertilizer applications[J]. Plant, Soil and Environment, 2014, 60(5): 198-203.
[35]	STEVENSON F J. Nature of divalent transition metal complexes of humic acids as revealed by a modified potentiometric titration method[J]. Soil Science, 1977, 123(1): 10-17.
[36]	RENGEL Z, BATTEN G D, CROWLEY D E. Agronomic approaches for improving the micronutrient density in edible portions of field crops[J]. Field Crops Research, 1999, 60(1/2): 27-40.

原料 Raw material	全氮含量 Total N content/ (g·kg^-1)	全磷含量 Total P content/ (g·kg^-1)	全钾含量 Total K content/ (g·kg^-1)	碱解氮含量 Alkali-hydrolyzable N content/ (mg·kg^-1)	速效磷含量 Available P content/ (mg·kg^-1)	速效钾含量 Available K content/ (mg·kg^-1)	有机质含量 Organic matter content/ (g·kg^-1)
平菇菇渣Mushroom residue	9.10	6.65	11.40	630.58	284.33	9 253.33	470.31
牛粪Cow manure	9.00	5.71	13.30	686.58	383.29	6 786.67	510.76
羊粪Sheep manure	8.99	6.61	11.80	658.58	304.87	9 320.00	945.67
玉米秸秆Corn straw	10.04	7.79	15.09	546.58	385.61	8 246.67	998.77
甘蓝尾菜 Cabbage vegetable residue	11.09	5.41	139.60	971.25	391.25	13 886.67	614.43

原料 Raw material	全氮含量 Total N content/ (g·kg^-1)	全磷含量 Total P content/ (g·kg^-1)	全钾含量 Total K content/ (g·kg^-1)	碱解氮含量 Alkali-hydrolyzable N content/ (mg·kg^-1)	速效磷含量 Available P content/ (mg·kg^-1)	速效钾含量 Available K content/ (mg·kg^-1)	有机质含量 Organic matter content/ (g·kg^-1)
平菇菇渣Mushroom residue	9.10	6.65	11.40	630.58	284.33	9 253.33	470.31
牛粪Cow manure	9.00	5.71	13.30	686.58	383.29	6 786.67	510.76
羊粪Sheep manure	8.99	6.61	11.80	658.58	304.87	9 320.00	945.67
玉米秸秆Corn straw	10.04	7.79	15.09	546.58	385.61	8 246.67	998.77
甘蓝尾菜 Cabbage vegetable residue	11.09	5.41	139.60	971.25	391.25	13 886.67	614.43

处理 Treatments	生物产量 The biological yield/(kg·667m^-2)	经济产量 The economic yield/(kg·667m^-2)	经济系数 Harvest index	产量增幅 Output growth/%
CK1	3 633.03±351.10 b	2 523.88±285.34 b	0.69±0.01 cd	—
CK2	6 099.17±236.11 a	4 501.77±271.38 a	0.74±0.01 ab	0.00
T1	5 675.91±725.68 a	4 165.29±504.39 a	0.73±0.01 ab	-6.93
T2	5 225.50±753.23 a	3 807.55±546.95 a	0.73±0.01 abc	-14.32
T3	5 566.46±487.63 a	4 072.01±346.04 a	0.73±0.01 ab	-8.73
T4	6 427.38±345.93 a	4 649.35±272.89 a	0.72±0.01 abc	5.38
T5	5 590.96±221.02 a	3 813.67±74.84 a	0.68±0.03 d	-8.33
T6	6 537.18±393.84 a	4 750.88±284.33 a	0.73±0.01 abc	7.18
T7	5 203.39±634.88 a	3 703.85±514.95 a	0.71±0.01 bcd	-14.69
T8	6 032.56±533.60 a	4 522.70±410.66 a	0.75±0.01 a	-1.09

处理 Treatments	生物产量 The biological yield/(kg·667m^-2)	经济产量 The economic yield/(kg·667m^-2)	经济系数 Harvest index	产量增幅 Output growth/%
CK1	3 633.03±351.10 b	2 523.88±285.34 b	0.69±0.01 cd	—
CK2	6 099.17±236.11 a	4 501.77±271.38 a	0.74±0.01 ab	0.00
T1	5 675.91±725.68 a	4 165.29±504.39 a	0.73±0.01 ab	-6.93
T2	5 225.50±753.23 a	3 807.55±546.95 a	0.73±0.01 abc	-14.32
T3	5 566.46±487.63 a	4 072.01±346.04 a	0.73±0.01 ab	-8.73
T4	6 427.38±345.93 a	4 649.35±272.89 a	0.72±0.01 abc	5.38
T5	5 590.96±221.02 a	3 813.67±74.84 a	0.68±0.03 d	-8.33
T6	6 537.18±393.84 a	4 750.88±284.33 a	0.73±0.01 abc	7.18
T7	5 203.39±634.88 a	3 703.85±514.95 a	0.71±0.01 bcd	-14.69
T8	6 032.56±533.60 a	4 522.70±410.66 a	0.75±0.01 a	-1.09

处理 Treatments	Ca含量 Ca content/ (g·kg^-1)	Mg含量 Mg content/ (g·kg^-1)	Cu含量 Cu content/ (mg·kg^-1)	Fe含量 Fe content/ (mg·kg^-1)	Mn含量 Mn content/ (mg·kg^-1)	Zn含量 Zn content/ (mg·kg^-1)
T1	10.47±0.08 ab	2.20±0.04 d	0.15±0.02 cd	4.15±0.29 abc	0.43±0.01 abc	0.54±0.01 a
T2	9.91±0.25 b	2.78±0.06 b	0.14±0.01 de	4.84±0.05 a	0.39±0.03 cde	0.53±0.01 a
T3	10.02±0.48 b	2.98±0.05 a	0.17±0.01 cd	3.92±0.20 bcd	0.48±0.02 ab	0.51±0.01 ab
T4	8.90±0.12 c	2.28±0.07 cd	0.19±0.01 abc	3.26±0.04 d	0.37±0.03 cde	0.47±0.01 b
T5	10.22±0.54 b	2.72±0.05 b	0.13±0.01 de	1.76±0.06 e	0.35±0.03 de	0.47±0.01 b
T6	11.28±0.25 a	2.44±0.07 c	0.21±0.02 ab	4.51±0.24 ab	0.49±0.01 a	0.54±0.02 a
T7	10.41±0.11 ab	2.71±0.10 b	0.18±0.01 bc	3.57±0.08 cd	0.48±0.01 ab	0.42±0.02 c
T8	10.22±0.20 b	2.35±0.05 cd	0.23±0.01 a	3.60±0.40 cd	0.41±0.03 bcd	0.43±0.01 c
CK1	8.35±0.28 c	1.76±0.03 e	0.11±0.01 e	1.60±0.21 e	0.39±0.01 cde	0.40±0.02 c
CK2	9.87±0.31 b	2.17±0.09 d	0.16±0.01 cd	3.76±0.38 cd	0.32±0.03 e	0.41±0.01 c

Effects of different fertilizer formulations of agricultural wastes on growth, yield and quality of cabbage

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 10

References 36

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

指标Index	T1	T2	T3	T4	T5	T6	T7	T8	CK1	CK2
投影Projection	0.38	0.26	0.05	0.62	0.40	1.00	0.78	0.78	0	0.75
最大叶面积Maximum leaf area	0.56	0	0.16	0.60	0.38	1.00	0.32	0.32	0.13	0.66
株高Plant height	0.92	0.21	0.49	0.74	0.79	0.92	1.00	1.00	0	0.65
根系活力Root vitality	0.30	0.19	1.00	0.56	0.43	0.35	0.20	0.09	0.03	0
生物产量Economic yield	0.70	0.55	0.67	0.96	0.67	1.00	0.54	0.83	0	0.85
经济产量Biological yield	0.74	0.58	0.70	0.95	0.58	1.00	0.53	0.90	0	0.89
干物质积累量Dry matter accumulation	0.10	0.35	0.45	0.75	0.47	1.00	0.39	0.41	0	0.59
可溶性糖含量Soluble sugar content	0.97	0.57	0.20	0.48	0.43	1.00	0.11	0.64	0	0.11
可溶性蛋白含量Soluble protein content	0.37	0.87	0.88	1.00	0.22	0	0.86	0.04	0.42	0.90
维生素C含量V_C content	0.04	0.30	0.35	0.87	0.61	1.00	0.82	0.71	0	0.36
硝酸盐含量Nitrate content	0.32	0.79	0.54	0	0.56	1.00	0.68	0.69	0.29	0.91
钙含量Ca content	0.72	0.53	0.57	0.19	0.64	1.00	0.70	0.64	0	0.52
镁含量Mg content	0.36	0.84	1.00	0.42	0.79	0.56	0.78	0.48	0	0.34
铜含量Cu content	0.43	0.30	0.60	0.81	0.24	1.00	0.72	1.13	0	0.46
铁含量Fe content	0.73	0.94	0.63	0.21	0.42	1.00	0.40	0.42	0	0.53
锰含量Mn content	0.71	0.52	0.94	0.41	0.31	1.00	0.93	0.62	0	0.33
锌含量Zn content	1.00	0.91	0.79	0.50	0.50	0.96	0.10	0.16	0	0.07
平均隶属度Average membership	0.55	0.51	0.59	0.59	0.50	0.87	0.58	0.58	0.05	0.52
位次Rank	6	8	3	2	9	1	5	4	10	7

[1]	ZHANG Ning, TAO Ronghao, LIU Peishi, HU Hanxiu, GAO Linlin, GUO Long, ZHU Zunyou, MA Youhua. Effects of organic fertilizer coupled with chemical fertilizer on growth and quality of tea and soil fertility [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(8): 1844-1852.
[2]	WANG Di, YANG Hanmei, LI Yangqian, JIA Mengting, ZOU Liang, YANG Fan. Multidimensional evaluation of “variety, quality, efficiency and application” of Tartary buckwheat and research progress of high-value utilization of active ingredients [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(8): 1960-1974.
[3]	TIAN Yugang, WAN Sumei, LIN Jiao, CHEN Guodong, LI Hao, HU Yukai, LI Yanfang, HU Shoulin, MAO Tingyong, ZHAO Shuzhen. Effect of mulch types and irrigation amounts on photosynthetic parameters, yield and quality of cotton [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(7): 1523-1531.
[4]	YANG Kun, HOU Guanjun, ZHAO Xiuxia, FANG Ting, WANG Lijun. Effects of aquatic animals-plants synergistic purification system on water quality and economic benefit in mandarin fish pond [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(7): 1709-1719.
[5]	BU Yuanpeng, LIU Na, ZHANG Guwen, FENG Zhijuan, WANG Bin, GONG Yaming, XU Linying. Diversity evaluation of agronomic traits and construction of core collection and taste quality evaluation system in vegetable soybean germplasm resources [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(6): 1307-1314.
[6]	CHAI Guanqun, ZHOU Wei, LIANG Hong, FAN Feifei, ZHU Dayan, FAN Chengwu. Effect of foliar spraying of zinc fertilizer and citric acid on yield, quality and Cd absorption and transport ation of pepper [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(5): 1069-1079.
[7]	XIAO Lihan, XIN Meiguo, LU Wenjing, YE Qin, ZHANG Cen, XIAO Chaogeng, CHEN Di. Effects of different storage conditions on quality of royal jelly from three pollen sources [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(5): 1161-1167.
[8]	ZHANG Chaozheng, ZHANG Xupeng, CHEN Danling. Does labor force aging and cultivated land fragmentation increase rice production cost?: based on microscopic investigation in southeast Hubei Province, China [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(5): 1211-1222.
[9]	MA Yihu, ZENG Xiaoyuan, HE Xianbiao, ZHOU Naidi, CHEN Jian. Response of grain yield and quality of high quality rice to climate factors at different sowing dates in southeastern Zhejiang Province, China [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(4): 736-751.
[10]	ZENG Xiaochun, LI Suicheng, SHI Guanqing, XING Zeyu. Comprehensive evaluation of China’s regional agricultural quality development level based on entropy weight TOPSIS under background of carbon peaking and carbon neutrality goals: from perspective of change speed [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(4): 962-972.
[11]	WANG Jinfeng, ZHOU Qi, LYU Yulong, CHEN Zhuomei. Effects of intercropping tea with landscape trees on ecosystem of tea garden and tea production [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(3): 523-533.
[12]	WANG Longwei, BAI Junyan, JIA Xiaoping, LEI Ying, CHEN Mengke, FAN Hongdeng, LU Xiaoning, HE Yuhan, ZENG Fanlin, ZHANG Rongkai. Association analysis between GnRH-1 gene polymorphism and egg quality in quail [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(3): 565-574.
[13]	LIN Yong, DAI Weiwei, BAO Encai, WANG Qiang, BAI Zongchun, XIA Liru, ZHANG Yao, SUN Yulun, OUYANG Lihu. Optimization and computational fluid dynamics analysis of fan operation for cascading cage-rearing meat duck house in summer [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(3): 666-675.
[14]	ZHANG Yanbin, GENG Bin, LIANG Ying, XU Tiaojuan, XU Baogen, ZENG Xin, ZHANG Yueyue. Research on promotion mechanism of “standard land” reform to high quality development of modern agriculture [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(3): 688-697.
[15]	WANG Ningke, ZHANG Rui, ZHANG Shengyong. Effects of mechanization service degree and farmland operation scale on maize production efficiency [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(3): 698-707.