Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis ›› 2023, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (5): 1132-1143.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2023.05.17
• Environmental Science • Previous Articles Next Articles
Effects of intercropping on stoichiometric characteristics and nutrients contribution rate of soil aggregates in Rosa roxbunghii Tratt. orchard
WU Chuanmei1(
), HE Ji1,*(), WU Wenshan1, CAI Jun1, XIANG Yangzhou2
- 1. College of Agriculture, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China
2. School of Geography and Resources, Guizhou Education University, Guiyang 550018, China
-
Received:2022-03-07Online:2023-05-25Published:2023-06-01
CLC Number:
Cite this article
WU Chuanmei, HE Ji, WU Wenshan, CAI Jun, XIANG Yangzhou. Effects of intercropping on stoichiometric characteristics and nutrients contribution rate of soil aggregates in Rosa roxbunghii Tratt. orchard[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(5): 1132-1143.
share this article
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.zjnyxb.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2023.05.17
Fig.1 Aggregate composition of soil in Rosa roxbunghii Tratt. orchard under different intercropping modes Bars marked without the same letters indicate significant difference at P<0.05 within treatments under the same particle size. The same as below.
Fig.1 Aggregate composition of soil in Rosa roxbunghii Tratt. orchard under different intercropping modes Bars marked without the same letters indicate significant difference at P<0.05 within treatments under the same particle size. The same as below.
Fig.2 Organic carbon content in soil aggregates under different treatments
Fig.2 Organic carbon content in soil aggregates under different treatments
Fig.3 Total nitrogen content in soil aggregates under different treatments
Fig.3 Total nitrogen content in soil aggregates under different treatments
Fig.4 Total phosphorus content in soil aggregates under different treatments
Fig.4 Total phosphorus content in soil aggregates under different treatments
Table 1 C/N ratio (C/N)of soil aggregates under different treatments
| 土层 Soil layer/cm | 处理 Treatment | 不同粒径(mm)团聚体的C/N C/N of soil aggregates with different particle size (mm) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| >5 | >2~5 | >1~2 | >0.5~1 | 0.25~0.5 | <0.25 | ||
| 0~20 | M1 | 25.90±0.85 a | 28.65±4.88 a | 22.72±3.27 a | 19.47±1.98 a | 20.48±1.15 a | 17.85±0.26 a |
| M2 | 18.91±1.55 b | 19.59±1.82 ab | 15.20±150 ab | 16.42±1.82 ab | 15.89±1.05 b | 12.25±2.28 b | |
| CK | 11.96±1.92 c | 11.78±1.73 b | 10.70±1.69 b | 11.24±1.12 b | 11.37±1.13 c | 10.26±1.24 b | |
| 20~40 | M1 | 17.93±2.41 a | 18.11±2.01 a | 20.20±2.66 a | 20.44±3.44 a | 19.60±1.33 a | 22.16±0.76 a |
| M2 | 12.49±1.97 a | 11.77±1.77 a | 12.09±2.13 b | 9.89±1.29 b | 9.70±1.12 b | 8.90±1.30 c | |
| CK | 14.89±3.61 a | 15.39±2.55 a | 16.05±1.59 ab | 17.52±3.13 ab | 16.92±1.72 a | 15.72±1.64 b | |
Table 1 C/N ratio (C/N)of soil aggregates under different treatments
| 土层 Soil layer/cm | 处理 Treatment | 不同粒径(mm)团聚体的C/N C/N of soil aggregates with different particle size (mm) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| >5 | >2~5 | >1~2 | >0.5~1 | 0.25~0.5 | <0.25 | ||
| 0~20 | M1 | 25.90±0.85 a | 28.65±4.88 a | 22.72±3.27 a | 19.47±1.98 a | 20.48±1.15 a | 17.85±0.26 a |
| M2 | 18.91±1.55 b | 19.59±1.82 ab | 15.20±150 ab | 16.42±1.82 ab | 15.89±1.05 b | 12.25±2.28 b | |
| CK | 11.96±1.92 c | 11.78±1.73 b | 10.70±1.69 b | 11.24±1.12 b | 11.37±1.13 c | 10.26±1.24 b | |
| 20~40 | M1 | 17.93±2.41 a | 18.11±2.01 a | 20.20±2.66 a | 20.44±3.44 a | 19.60±1.33 a | 22.16±0.76 a |
| M2 | 12.49±1.97 a | 11.77±1.77 a | 12.09±2.13 b | 9.89±1.29 b | 9.70±1.12 b | 8.90±1.30 c | |
| CK | 14.89±3.61 a | 15.39±2.55 a | 16.05±1.59 ab | 17.52±3.13 ab | 16.92±1.72 a | 15.72±1.64 b | |
Table 2 C/P ratio (C/P) of soil aggregates under different treatments
| 土层 Soil layer/cm | 处理 Treatment | 不同粒径(mm)团聚体的C/P C/P of soil aggregates with different particle size (mm) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| >5 | >2~5 | >1~2 | >0.5~1 | 0.25~0.5 | <0.25 | ||
| 0~20 | M1 | 67.02±7.20 a | 67.32±5.18 a | 63.72±7.86 a | 54.29±4.86 a | 54.13±5.51 a | 51.72±4.10 a |
| M2 | 47.30±6.97 ab | 52.02±11.48 a | 40.37±2.47 b | 43.85±1.53 ab | 43.87±2.81 a | 37.96±7.28 a | |
| CK | 39.67±6.86 b | 40.41±6.69 a | 38.37±7.07 b | 39.53±4.45 b | 40.28±4.37 a | 51.43±13.04 a | |
| 20~40 | M1 | 43.14±0.25 a | 39.61±2.74 a | 38.91±2.28 a | 36.55±2.72 b | 34.24±0.69 b | 33.54±2.22 b |
| M2 | 37.74±9.60 a | 35.84±8.25 a | 35.78±7.68 a | 28.83±4.79 b | 30.16±4.70 b | 31.95±5.00 b | |
| CK | 42.44±9.03 a | 49.72±11.93 a | 52.42±4.95 a | 50.39±3.67 a | 52.24±5.97 a | 47.33±1.54 a | |
Table 2 C/P ratio (C/P) of soil aggregates under different treatments
| 土层 Soil layer/cm | 处理 Treatment | 不同粒径(mm)团聚体的C/P C/P of soil aggregates with different particle size (mm) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| >5 | >2~5 | >1~2 | >0.5~1 | 0.25~0.5 | <0.25 | ||
| 0~20 | M1 | 67.02±7.20 a | 67.32±5.18 a | 63.72±7.86 a | 54.29±4.86 a | 54.13±5.51 a | 51.72±4.10 a |
| M2 | 47.30±6.97 ab | 52.02±11.48 a | 40.37±2.47 b | 43.85±1.53 ab | 43.87±2.81 a | 37.96±7.28 a | |
| CK | 39.67±6.86 b | 40.41±6.69 a | 38.37±7.07 b | 39.53±4.45 b | 40.28±4.37 a | 51.43±13.04 a | |
| 20~40 | M1 | 43.14±0.25 a | 39.61±2.74 a | 38.91±2.28 a | 36.55±2.72 b | 34.24±0.69 b | 33.54±2.22 b |
| M2 | 37.74±9.60 a | 35.84±8.25 a | 35.78±7.68 a | 28.83±4.79 b | 30.16±4.70 b | 31.95±5.00 b | |
| CK | 42.44±9.03 a | 49.72±11.93 a | 52.42±4.95 a | 50.39±3.67 a | 52.24±5.97 a | 47.33±1.54 a | |
Table 3 N/P ratio (N/P) of soil aggregates under different treatments
| 土层 Soil layer/cm | 处理 Treatment | 不同粒径(mm)团聚体的N/P N/P of soil aggregates with different particle size (mm) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| >5 | >2~5 | >1~2 | >0.5~1 | 0.25~0.5 | <0.25 | ||
| 0~20 | M1 | 2.59±0.26 b | 2.46±0.33 b | 2.82±0.05 b | 2.80±0.13 b | 2.64±0.20 b | 2.90±0.26 b |
| M2 | 2.48±0.19 b | 2.60±0.36 b | 2.71±0.33 b | 2.74±0.33 b | 2.78±0.23 b | 3.09±0.19 b | |
| CK | 3.30±0.05 a | 3.42±0.86 a | 3.55±0.11 a | 3.51±0.06 a | 3.54±0.12 a | 4.86±0.70 a | |
| 20~40 | M1 | 2.48±0.29 a | 2.23±0.23 a | 1.98±0.26 b | 1.86±0.23 b | 1.77±0.16 b | 1.52±0.15 b |
| M2 | 2.92±0.37 a | 2.96±0.34 a | 2.93±0.36 ab | 2.89±0.24 ab | 3.08±0.15 a | 3.59±0.32 a | |
| CK | 2.89±0.11 a | 3.17±0.25 a | 3.32±0.39 a | 3.02±0.45 a | 3.16±0.53 a | 3.11±0.46 a | |
Table 3 N/P ratio (N/P) of soil aggregates under different treatments
| 土层 Soil layer/cm | 处理 Treatment | 不同粒径(mm)团聚体的N/P N/P of soil aggregates with different particle size (mm) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| >5 | >2~5 | >1~2 | >0.5~1 | 0.25~0.5 | <0.25 | ||
| 0~20 | M1 | 2.59±0.26 b | 2.46±0.33 b | 2.82±0.05 b | 2.80±0.13 b | 2.64±0.20 b | 2.90±0.26 b |
| M2 | 2.48±0.19 b | 2.60±0.36 b | 2.71±0.33 b | 2.74±0.33 b | 2.78±0.23 b | 3.09±0.19 b | |
| CK | 3.30±0.05 a | 3.42±0.86 a | 3.55±0.11 a | 3.51±0.06 a | 3.54±0.12 a | 4.86±0.70 a | |
| 20~40 | M1 | 2.48±0.29 a | 2.23±0.23 a | 1.98±0.26 b | 1.86±0.23 b | 1.77±0.16 b | 1.52±0.15 b |
| M2 | 2.92±0.37 a | 2.96±0.34 a | 2.93±0.36 ab | 2.89±0.24 ab | 3.08±0.15 a | 3.59±0.32 a | |
| CK | 2.89±0.11 a | 3.17±0.25 a | 3.32±0.39 a | 3.02±0.45 a | 3.16±0.53 a | 3.11±0.46 a | |
Fig.5 Alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen content in soil aggregates under different treatments
Fig.5 Alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen content in soil aggregates under different treatments
Fig.6 Available phosphorus content in soil aggregates under different treatments
Fig.6 Available phosphorus content in soil aggregates under different treatments
Fig.7 Available potassium content in soil aggregates under different treatments
Fig.7 Available potassium content in soil aggregates under different treatments
Fig.8 Contribution rate of nutrients in aggregates to soil under different treatments
Fig.8 Contribution rate of nutrients in aggregates to soil under different treatments
| [1] | 芦星淼, 朱毅. 刺梨中氨基酸随成熟度变化及营养价值分析[J]. 食品研究与开发, 2020, 41(22): 12-16. |
| LU X M, ZHU Y. Changes of amino acids in Rosa roxburghii with maturity and nutritional value analysis[J]. Food Research and Development, 2020, 41(22): 12-16. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [2] | 王翼, 顾苑婷, 丁筑红, 等. 超高效液相色谱-串联高分辨质谱对刺梨槲皮素及其糖苷类化合物的鉴定分析[J]. 分析化学, 2020, 48(7): 955-961. |
| WANG Y, GU Y T, DING Z H, et al. Identification and analysis of quercetin and its glycosides in Rosa roxburghii by ultra high performance liquid chromatography-tandem high resolution mass spectrometry[J]. Chinese Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 2020, 48(7): 955-961. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [3] | 李婷婷, 黄名正, 唐维媛, 等. 刺梨汁中挥发性成分测定及其呈香贡献分析[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2021, 47(4): 237-246. |
| LI T T, HUANG M Z, TANG W Y, et al. Determination of volatile components in Rosa roxburghii Tratt juice and the analysis of its contribution for aroma[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2021, 47(4): 237-246. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [4] |
XU Y Y, YU C, ZENG Q B, et al. Assessing the potential value of Rosa roxburghii Tratt in arsenic-induced liver damage based on elemental imbalance and oxidative damage[J]. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 2021, 43(3): 1165-1175.
DOI |
| [5] |
WU H Y, LI M M, YANG X R, et al. Extraction optimization, physicochemical properties and antioxidant and hypoglycemic activities of polysaccharides from Roxburgh rose (Rosa roxburghii Tratt.) leaves[J]. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2020, 165: 517-529.
DOI URL |
| [6] | 吴彤林, 肖朝锋, 莫熙礼. 无籽刺梨主要病虫害防控技术探究[J]. 南方农业, 2020, 14(24): 1-2. |
| WU T L, XIAO C F, MO X L. Study on prevention and control technology of main pests and diseases of seedless Rosa roxburghii[J]. South China Agriculture, 2020, 14(24): 1-2. (in Chinese) | |
| [7] | 邹涛, 成忠均, 吉云, 等. 超临界CO2萃取刺梨果肉挥发性物质工艺研究[J]. 中药材, 2020, 43(4): 942-945. |
| ZOU T, CHENG Z J, JI Y, et al. Study on supercritical CO2 extraction of volatile substances from Rosa roxburghii pulp[J]. Journal of Chinese Medicinal Materials, 2020, 43(4): 942-945. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [8] | 周禹佳, 樊卫国. 刺梨果渣的营养、保健成分及利用价值评价[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2021, 47(7): 217-224. |
| ZHOU Y J, FAN W G. Nutrition and health-care composition of Rosa roxburghii Tratt pomace and its utilization potential[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2021, 47(7): 217-224. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [9] | 陆国敏. 刺梨种植管理及养护措施[J]. 农业与技术, 2017, 37(22): 213. |
| LU G M. Planting management and maintenance measures of Rosa roxburghii[J]. Agriculture and Technology, 2017, 37(22): 213. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [10] | 李伶俐, 黄耿华, 李彦鹏, 等. 棉花与不同作物同穴互作育苗对土壤微生物、酶活性和根系分泌物的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2012, 18(6): 1475-1482. |
| LI L L, HUANG G H, LI Y P, et al. Effects of mutual aid grow seedlings of cotton with other crops in the same aperture on soil microorganisms quantity, enzyme activity and root secretion[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2012, 18(6): 1475-1482. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [11] | 代会会, 胡雪峰, 曹明阳, 等. 豆科间作对番茄产量、土壤养分及酶活性的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2015, 52(4): 911-918. |
| DAI H H, HU X F, CAO M Y, et al. Effects of intercropping with leguminous crops on tomato yield, soil nutrients and enzyme activity[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2015, 52(4): 911-918. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [12] | 成婧, 吴发启, 云峰, 等. 渭北旱塬坡耕地玉米-苜蓿间作对土壤养分和产量的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2013, 33(4): 228-232. |
| CHENG J, WU F Q, YUN F, et al. Effect of intercropping corn and alfalfa on soil nutrients and yield of sloping field in Weibei dryland[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2013, 33(4): 228-232. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [13] | 刘亚军. 马铃薯不同间作模式对作物与土壤的影响[D]. 银川: 宁夏大学, 2017. |
| LIU Y J. Effect of different intercropping cultivation patterns of potato on crop and soil[D]. Yinchuan: Ningxia University, 2017. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [14] |
MA Y H, FU S L, ZHANG X P, et al. Intercropping improves soil nutrient availability, soil enzyme activity and tea quantity and quality[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2017, 119: 171-178.
DOI URL |
| [15] | 滕维超. 油茶-农作物间作系统生理生态及经济效益评价[D]. 南京: 南京林业大学, 2013. |
| TENG W C. Physiological, ecological effects and economic benefits evaluation of Camellia oleifera-crop intercropping system[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Forestry University, 2013. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [16] | 党小燕, 刘建国, 帕尼古丽, 等. 棉花间作模式中作物养分竞争吸收和积累动态的研究[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013, 19(1): 166-173. |
| DANG X Y, LIU J G, PANI G, et al. Accumulation and competition of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium in cotton-based intercropping systems in Xinjiang, China[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2013, 19(1): 166-173. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [17] | 郭欣照, 刘英, 李松, 等. 间作对刺梨园土壤养分的影响[J]. 林业科技通讯, 2021(3): 66-69. |
| GUO X Z, LIU Y, LI S, et al. Effect of intercropping on soil nutrient in Rosa roxbunghii orchard[J]. Forest Science and Technology, 2021(3): 66-69. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [18] | 刘岚君, 何季, 文雪峰. 间作不同农作物对刺梨园土壤微生物类群及酶活性的影响[J]. 山地农业生物学报, 2019, 38(6): 8-13. |
| LIU L J, HE J, WEN X F. Effects of intercropping different crops on soil microbial group and enzyme activities in rose roxburghii orchard[J]. Journal of Mountain Agriculture and Biology, 2019, 38(6): 8-13. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [19] | 王华, 向仰州, 郭颖, 等. 间作对刺梨园土壤水稳性团聚体及有机碳含量的影响[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2019, 47(9): 88-92. |
| WANG H, XIANG Y Z, GUO Y, et al. Effect of intercropping between Rosa roxbunghii+maize or pepper on content of water-stable aggregates and organic carbon in soil of Rosa roxbunghii orchard[J]. Guizhou Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 47(9): 88-92. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [20] |
ELSER J, STERNER R, GOROKHOVA E, et al. Biological stoichiometry from genes to ecosystems[J]. Ecology Letters, 2000, 3(6): 540-550.
DOI URL |
| [21] |
ELSER J J, BRACKEN M E S, CLELAND E E, et al. Global analysis of nitrogen and phosphorus limitation of primary producers in freshwater, marine and terrestrial ecosystems[J]. Ecology Letters, 2007, 10(12): 1135-1142.
DOI PMID |
| [22] |
TIAN H Q, CHEN G S, ZHANG C, et al. Pattern and variation of C: N: P ratios in China’s soils: a synthesis of observational data[J]. Biogeochemistry, 2010, 98(1): 139-151.
DOI URL |
| [23] |
XIAO S S, ZHANG W, YE Y Y, et al. Soil aggregate mediates the impacts of land uses on organic carbon, total nitrogen, and microbial activity in a Karst ecosystem[J]. Scientific Reports, 2017, 7: 41402.
DOI PMID |
| [24] |
王晓荣, 胡文杰, 潘磊, 等. 三峡库区花岗岩母质石英砂土不同经济林模式土壤养分特征研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(21): 82-91.
DOI |
|
WANG X R, HU W J, PAN L, et al. Different economic forest modes in quartz sandy soil from granite parent in the Three Gorges Reservoir area: soil nutrient characteristics[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(21): 82-91. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI |
|
| [25] | 郑子成, 何淑勤, 王永东, 等. 不同土地利用方式下土壤团聚体中养分的分布特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2010, 24(3): 170-174. |
| ZHENG Z C, HE S Q, WANG Y D, et al. Distrbution feature of soil nutrients in aggregate under different land use[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2010, 24(3): 170-174. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [26] | 王清奎, 汪思龙. 土壤团聚体形成与稳定机制及影响因素[J]. 土壤通报, 2005, 36(3): 415-421. |
| WANG Q K, WANG S L. Forming and stable mechanism of soil aggregate and influencing factors[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2005, 36(3): 415-421. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [27] | PAUL B K, VANLAUWE B, AYUKE F, et al. Medium-term impact of tillage and residue management on soil aggregate stability, soil carbon and crop productivity[J]. Agriculture， Ecosystems & Environment, 2013, 164: 14-22. |
| [28] | 陈朝, 吕昌河, 范兰, 等. 土地利用变化对土壤有机碳的影响研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2011, 31(18): 5358-5371. |
| CHEN Z, LÜ C H, FAN L, et al. Effects of land use change on soil organic carbon: a review[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011, 31(18): 5358-5371. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [29] | 莫晶. 油茶-花生间作土壤酶活性及养分研究[D]. 长沙: 中南林业科技大学, 2017. |
| MO J. Soil enzyme activity and nutrient contents in Camellia oleifera-Arachis hypogaea intercropping system[D]. Changsha: Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2017. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [30] | 王慧敏, 蔡洪月, 何蓉蓉, 等. 间作芳香地被植物对茶园土壤理化性状及养分的影响[J]. 西南林业大学学报, 2016, 36(5): 71-77. |
| WANG H M, CAI H Y, HE R R, et al. Effects of intercropping of aromatic plants with tea on physicochemical properties and soil nutrients in tea plantation[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2016, 36(5): 71-77. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [31] | 罗洋, 张桂玲, 王芳, 等. 辣椒秸秆生物炭对黄壤化学特性及小白菜生长的影响[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 2022, 40(6): 847-852. |
| LUO Y, ZHANG G L, WANG F, et al. Effect of chili straw biochar on chemical characteristics of yellow soil and growth of chinese Cabbage[J]. Journal of Sichuan Agricultural University, 2022, 40(6): 847-852. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [32] | 徐健程, 王晓维, 朱晓芳, 等. 不同绿肥种植模式下玉米秸秆腐解特征研究[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2016, 22(1): 48-58. |
| XU J C, WANG X W, ZHU X F, et al. Study on decomposition of maize straw under different green manure cropping patterns[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2016, 22(1): 48-58. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [33] | 刘腾飞, 董明辉, 张丽, 等. 不同间作模式对茶园土壤和茶叶营养品质的影响[J]. 食品科学技术学报, 2017, 35(6): 67-76. |
| LIU T F, DONG M H, ZHANG L, et al. Effects of different intercropping patterns on tea-planted soil and tea nutritional quality[J]. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 2017, 35(6): 67-76. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [34] | 李燕培, 林佳琦, 肖世祥, 等. 蕉园间作红薯对土壤微生物功能多样性的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2022, 30(6): 990-1001. |
| LI Y P, LIN J Q, XIAO S X, et al. Effects of intercropping sweet potato in banana plantation on functional diversity of soil microorganisms[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2022, 30(6): 990-1001. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [35] | 安婉丽, 谢海云, 王维奇, 等. 秸秆还田对稻田土壤水稳性团聚体养分及其生态化学计量比的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2017, 36(1): 150-156. |
| AN W L, XIE H Y, WANG W Q, et al. Effects of straw returning on nutrient content and ecological stoichiometric ratio of soil water-stable aggregates in paddy field[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2017, 36(1): 150-156. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [36] | 王绍强, 于贵瑞. 生态系统碳氮磷元素的生态化学计量学特征[J]. 生态学报, 2008, 28(8): 3937-3947. |
| WANG S Q, YU G R. Ecological stoichiometry characteristics of ecosystem carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus elements[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008, 28(8): 3937-3947. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [37] | 许宇星, 王志超, 竹万宽, 等. 不同品种桉树林生活叶-凋落物-土壤碳氮磷化学计量特征[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 46(3): 94-100. |
| XU Y X, WANG Z C, ZHU W K, et al. Stoichiometric characteristics of C, N and P in leaf-litter-soil of different Eucalyptus varieties[J]. Journal of Northwest A & F University(Natural Science Edition), 2018, 46(3): 94-100. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [38] | 李玮, 郑子成, 李廷轩, 等. 不同植茶年限土壤团聚体及其有机碳分布特征[J]. 生态学报, 2014, 34(21): 6326-6336. |
| LI W, ZHENG Z C, LI T X, et al. Distribution characteristics of soil aggregates and its organic carbon in different tea plantation age[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014, 34(21): 6326-6336. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [39] |
GÜSEWELL S. N: P ratios in terrestrial plants: variation and functional significance[J]. New Phytologist, 2004, 164(2): 243-266.
DOI URL |
| [40] |
SARDANS J, RIVAS-UBACH A, PEÑUELAS J. The C: N: P stoichiometry of organisms and ecosystems in a changing world: a review and perspectives[J]. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 2012, 14(1): 33-47.
DOI URL |
| [41] |
ZHANG Z S, SONG X L, LU X G, et al. Ecological stoichiometry of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus in estuarine wetland soils: influences of vegetation coverage, plant communities, geomorphology, and seawalls[J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2013, 13(6): 1043-1051.
DOI URL |
| [42] |
TESSIER J T, RAYNAL D J. Use of nitrogen to phosphorus ratios in plant tissue as an indicator of nutrient limitation and nitrogen saturation[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2003, 40(3): 523-534.
DOI URL |
| [43] | 邓浩俊, 陈爱民, 严思维, 等. 不同林龄新银合欢重吸收率及其C∶N∶P化学计量特征[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2015, 21(3): 522-527. |
| DENG H J, CHEN A M, YAN S W, et al. Nutrient resorption efficiency and C: N: P stoichiometry in different ages of Leucaena leucocephala[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 2015, 21(3): 522-527. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [44] | 邱莉萍, 张兴昌, 张晋爱. 黄土高原长期培肥土壤团聚体中养分和酶的分布[J]. 生态学报, 2006, 26(2): 364-372. |
| QIU L P, ZHANG X C, ZHANG J A. Distribution of nutrients and enzymes in Loess Plateau soil aggregates after long-term fertilization[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2006, 26(2): 364-372. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [45] | 王晟强, 郑子成, 李廷轩. 植茶年限对土壤团聚体氮、磷、钾含量变化的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013, 19(6): 1393-1402. |
| WANG S Q, ZHENG Z C, LI T X. Effects of ages of tea plantations on changes of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium contents in soil aggregates[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2013, 19(6): 1393-1402. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [46] |
李春越, 常顺, 钟凡心, 等. 种植模式和施肥对黄土旱塬农田土壤团聚体及其碳分布的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(1): 191-200.
DOI |
| LI C Y, CHANG S, ZHONG F X, et al. Effects of fertilization and planting patterns on soil aggregate and carbon distribution in farmland of the Loess Plateau, Northwest China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(1): 191-200. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [1] | YUE Zongwei, LI Jiaxiao, SUN Xiangyang, LIU Guoliang, LI Suyan, WANG Chenchen, ZHA Guichao, WEI Ningxian. Effects of chemical fertilizer combined with organic fertilizer on soil properties, cherry fruit quality and yield [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(9): 2192-2201. |
| [2] | LU Shuai, LUO Xiaogang, LIU Quanwei, ZHANG Yi, MENG Yanghao, LI Jie, ZHANG Jinglai. Effect of organic-inorganic compound fertilizer on wheat growth, nutrients and heavy metal content of soil and wheat [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(4): 922-930. |
| [3] | WANG Jinfeng, ZHOU Qi, LYU Yulong, CHEN Zhuomei. Effects of intercropping tea with landscape trees on ecosystem of tea garden and tea production [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(3): 523-533. |
| [4] | YANG Shengzhu, LI Xiang, LI Chaowen, CHEN Hainian, LIU Li, LU Yingang, CAO Zhuoyang. Characteristics of soil nutrients and enzyme activities in rhizosphere of tobacco affected by bacterial wilt in Guizhou Province, China [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(1): 146-155. |
| [5] | SUN Wenyan, LIU Xiaogang, ZHANG Wenhui, LI Huiyong, WU Lang, YANG Qiliang, XIONG Guomei. Optimization of drip fertigation scheme for Coffea arabica based on soil quality index [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(3): 566-573. |
| [6] | ZHANG Jianli, WANG Zhenhua, CHEN Rui, WANG Dongwang, LIANG Yonghui, LIU Ruhua. Effect of water-fertilizer interaction on yield, quality and soil nutrients of drip irrigated jujube [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(11): 2428-2437. |
| [7] | ZHAO Huijun, YAO Dongrui, SUN Linhe, CUI Jian, CHANG Yajun, CAO Jianjun. Accumulation ability and bioremediation potential of water dropwort on nine elements in livestock and poultry breeding wastewater [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(8): 1477-1488. |
| [8] | FAN Linjuan, LIU Zirong, XU Xueliang, WANG Fenshan, PENG Deliang, YAO Yingjuan. Effects of six kinds of nematicides on soil microbial population, enzymes activities and nutrients in replanted Chinese yam field [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(3): 506-515. |
| [9] | SUI Xiran, WANG Yan, LIU Yungen, ZHANG Yajie, WU Lifang. Responses of soil nutrients and microbial community to altitude in typical Pinus yunnanensis forest at rocky desertification region [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(12): 2348-2357. |
| [10] | LIANG Le, LIU Juan, LI Xiaomei, LIAO Jichao, LI Huanxiu, TANG Yi. Effects of intercropping with different genotypes of cherry tomato on fruit quality and selenium content [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(10): 1870-1878. |
| [11] | XIONG Tinghao, HUANG Yiguo, ZHOU Xuan, LU Yanhong, ZI Tao, HU Yuqian, SONG Haixing. Evaluation on soil nutrients and heavy metals pollution risk in main producing areas of rapeseed in Hunan Province, China [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(10): 1904-1912. |
| [12] | CHEN Gui, LU Chenni, SHI Yanping, NI Xiongwei, CHENG Wangda, ZHANG Hongmei, WANG Baojun, ZHANG Liping, SUN Da. Effect of different controlled-release fertilizers with urea ammonium on yield, nitrogen use efficiency and soil nutrients of rice [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(1): 122-130. |
| [13] | WANG Baojun, CHENG Wangda, CHEN Gui, SHEN Yaqiang, SHEN Meng, YUAN Ye, WANG Lei, ZHANG Hongmei. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer regulation on soil properties of paddy fields and rice yield with full amount returning of straw in Northern Zhejiang [J]. , 2020, 32(2): 183-190. |
| [14] | TAO Jing, WU Qifeng, SHI Jiang, LI Songhao, GE Jiangfei, CHEN Junhui, XU Qiufang, LIANG Chenfei, QIN Hua. Impact of intercropping and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on soil fertility and corn yield in a newly cultivated mountain land [J]. , 2020, 32(1): 115-123. |
| [15] | DONG Yufei, LYU Xiangzhang, ZHANG Zikun, HE Hongjun, YU Jingquan, ZHOU Yanhong. Effects of different cultivation patterns on soil microbial community and enzyme activity in continuous cropped pepper field [J]. , 2019, 31(9): 1485-1492. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
