Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis ›› 2024, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (8): 1878-1886.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20231078
• Environmental Science • Previous Articles Next Articles
SUN Li1(), ZHANG Shuwen1, YU Zheping1, ZHENG Xiliang1, LIANG Senmiao1, REN Haiying1, QI Xingjiang1,2,*(
)
Received:
2023-09-08
Online:
2024-08-25
Published:
2024-09-06
Contact:
QI Xingjiang
CLC Number:
SUN Li, ZHANG Shuwen, YU Zheping, ZHENG Xiliang, LIANG Senmiao, REN Haiying, QI Xingjiang. Effects of potassium humate on soil improvement, tree growth and fruiting of Chinese bayberry (Myrica rubra)[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(8): 1878-1886.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.zjnyxb.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20231078
处理Treatment | pH | EC/(μS·cm-1) | CEC/(cmol·kg-1) | BD/(g·cm-3) | SOC/(g·kg-1) | MWHC/(g·kg-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 4.84±0.02 c | 32.3±0.9 c | 6.87±0.12 b | 1.01±0.06 a | 28.38±1.48 b | 168.60±11.57 c |
T1 | 6.58±0.03 a | 82.1±2.9 a | 9.33±0.72 a | 1.15±0.04 a | 48.47±0.96 a | 211.05±3.75 b |
T2 | 6.03±0.02 b | 68.6±5.5 b | 9.82±0.27 a | 1.04±0.07 a | 48.16±3.34 a | 378.96±13.02 a |
Table 1 Soil physical and chemical properties under different treatments
处理Treatment | pH | EC/(μS·cm-1) | CEC/(cmol·kg-1) | BD/(g·cm-3) | SOC/(g·kg-1) | MWHC/(g·kg-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 4.84±0.02 c | 32.3±0.9 c | 6.87±0.12 b | 1.01±0.06 a | 28.38±1.48 b | 168.60±11.57 c |
T1 | 6.58±0.03 a | 82.1±2.9 a | 9.33±0.72 a | 1.15±0.04 a | 48.47±0.96 a | 211.05±3.75 b |
T2 | 6.03±0.02 b | 68.6±5.5 b | 9.82±0.27 a | 1.04±0.07 a | 48.16±3.34 a | 378.96±13.02 a |
处理Treatment | SAN/(mg·kg-1) | SAP/(mg·kg-1) | SAK/(mg·kg-1) | SECa/(cmol·kg-1) | SEMg/(cmol·kg-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 127.63±1.76 b | 208.67±2.52 a | 103.02±1.97 c | 1.64±0.09 b | 2.34±0.14 b |
T1 | 152.57±3.13 a | 206.84±1.81 a | 424.97±15.14 b | 3.43±0.07 a | 2.59±0.10 b |
T2 | 157.95±3.86 a | 212.25±4.81 a | 506.48±8.67 a | 3.38±0.05 a | 3.42±0.18 a |
Table 2 Soil available nutrients under different treatments
处理Treatment | SAN/(mg·kg-1) | SAP/(mg·kg-1) | SAK/(mg·kg-1) | SECa/(cmol·kg-1) | SEMg/(cmol·kg-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 127.63±1.76 b | 208.67±2.52 a | 103.02±1.97 c | 1.64±0.09 b | 2.34±0.14 b |
T1 | 152.57±3.13 a | 206.84±1.81 a | 424.97±15.14 b | 3.43±0.07 a | 2.59±0.10 b |
T2 | 157.95±3.86 a | 212.25±4.81 a | 506.48±8.67 a | 3.38±0.05 a | 3.42±0.18 a |
处理 Treatment | SMBC/ (mg·kg-1) | SMBN/ (mg·kg-1) | SMBC/ SMBN | S-UA/ (μg·g-1·d-1) | S-CA/ (mg·g-1·h-1) | S-APA/ (mg·g-1·d-1) | S-SA/ (mg·g-1·d-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 1 808.6±64.8 b | 29.96±5.79 b | 6.25±1.13 a | 27.18±0.53 c | 3.48±0.15 c | 1.32±0.07 a | 12.90±0.14 c |
T1 | 2 964.3±205.0 a | 65.15±6.36 a | 4.58±0.46 a | 34.77±0.22 b | 3.96±0.06 b | 0.88±0.02 b | 24.08±0.13 b |
T2 | 2 932.4±69.3 a | 65.90±9.51 a | 4.55±0.70 a | 51.03±0.89 a | 4.14±0.06 a | 1.21±0.05 a | 25.39±0.80 a |
Table 3 Soil microbial biomass carbon, nitrogen content and enzymes activities under different treatments
处理 Treatment | SMBC/ (mg·kg-1) | SMBN/ (mg·kg-1) | SMBC/ SMBN | S-UA/ (μg·g-1·d-1) | S-CA/ (mg·g-1·h-1) | S-APA/ (mg·g-1·d-1) | S-SA/ (mg·g-1·d-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 1 808.6±64.8 b | 29.96±5.79 b | 6.25±1.13 a | 27.18±0.53 c | 3.48±0.15 c | 1.32±0.07 a | 12.90±0.14 c |
T1 | 2 964.3±205.0 a | 65.15±6.36 a | 4.58±0.46 a | 34.77±0.22 b | 3.96±0.06 b | 0.88±0.02 b | 24.08±0.13 b |
T2 | 2 932.4±69.3 a | 65.90±9.51 a | 4.55±0.70 a | 51.03±0.89 a | 4.14±0.06 a | 1.21±0.05 a | 25.39±0.80 a |
处理 Treatment | 氮含量 N content | 磷含量 P content | 钾含量 K content | 钙含量 Ca content | 镁含量 Mg content |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 13.85±0.05 b | 2.14±0.03 a | 4.80±0.22 b | 6.09±0.20 b | 1.00±0.01 b |
T1 | 15.40±0.14 a | 1.87±0.20 a | 6.26±0.43 a | 6.56±0.15 a | 1.17±0.04 ab |
T2 | 13.97±0.06 b | 1.97±0.05 a | 6.91±0.22 a | 6.73±0.02 a | 1.25±0.10 a |
Table 4 Elements contents in Chinese bayberry stems under different treatments mg·g-1
处理 Treatment | 氮含量 N content | 磷含量 P content | 钾含量 K content | 钙含量 Ca content | 镁含量 Mg content |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 13.85±0.05 b | 2.14±0.03 a | 4.80±0.22 b | 6.09±0.20 b | 1.00±0.01 b |
T1 | 15.40±0.14 a | 1.87±0.20 a | 6.26±0.43 a | 6.56±0.15 a | 1.17±0.04 ab |
T2 | 13.97±0.06 b | 1.97±0.05 a | 6.91±0.22 a | 6.73±0.02 a | 1.25±0.10 a |
处理 Treatment | 氮含量 N content | 磷含量 P content | 钾含量 K content | 钙含量 Ca content | 镁含量 Mg content |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 7.74±0.09 a | 2.43±0.08 a | 3.38±0.28 b | 8.27±0.19 b | 0.718±0.012 b |
T1 | 7.75±0.02 a | 1.67±0.03 b | 4.27±0.30 a | 9.80±0.27 a | 0.989±0.061 a |
T2 | 7.55±0.17 a | 1.91±0.13 b | 4.40±0.36 a | 10.45±0.46 a | 1.032±0.028 a |
Table 5 Elements contents in Chinese bayberry leaves under different treatments mg·g-1
处理 Treatment | 氮含量 N content | 磷含量 P content | 钾含量 K content | 钙含量 Ca content | 镁含量 Mg content |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 7.74±0.09 a | 2.43±0.08 a | 3.38±0.28 b | 8.27±0.19 b | 0.718±0.012 b |
T1 | 7.75±0.02 a | 1.67±0.03 b | 4.27±0.30 a | 9.80±0.27 a | 0.989±0.061 a |
T2 | 7.55±0.17 a | 1.91±0.13 b | 4.40±0.36 a | 10.45±0.46 a | 1.032±0.028 a |
处理 Treatment | 单株产量 Yield per plant/kg | 单株商品果产量 Yield of commercial fruit per plant/kg | 单株优质果产量 Yield of high quality fruit per plant/kg | 商品果率 Proportion of commercial fruit per plant/% | 优质果率 Proportion of high quality fruit per plant/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 45.97±1.30 a | 31.23±2.89 b | 22.73±1.88 b | 67.96±6.17 b | 49.40±3.00 b |
T1 | 49.47±0.91 a | 41.13±2.00 a | 34.03±0.99 a | 83.17±4.01 a | 68.86±3.30 a |
T2 | 50.37±2.02 a | 42.86±1.60 a | 36.30±0.98 a | 85.12±0.30 a | 72.27±4.89 a |
Table 6 Yield of Chinese bayberry under different treatments
处理 Treatment | 单株产量 Yield per plant/kg | 单株商品果产量 Yield of commercial fruit per plant/kg | 单株优质果产量 Yield of high quality fruit per plant/kg | 商品果率 Proportion of commercial fruit per plant/% | 优质果率 Proportion of high quality fruit per plant/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 45.97±1.30 a | 31.23±2.89 b | 22.73±1.88 b | 67.96±6.17 b | 49.40±3.00 b |
T1 | 49.47±0.91 a | 41.13±2.00 a | 34.03±0.99 a | 83.17±4.01 a | 68.86±3.30 a |
T2 | 50.37±2.02 a | 42.86±1.60 a | 36.30±0.98 a | 85.12±0.30 a | 72.27±4.89 a |
处理Treatment | TSS/% | Fir/N | TS/(mg·g-1) | TA/(mg·g-1) | SS/(mg·g-1) | Ant/(μg·g-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 10.33±0.45 b | 1.46±0.07 b | 68.78±1.02 c | 4.68±0.18 b | 63.27±1.68 c | 129.65±2.10 c |
T1 | 13.17±0.37 a | 1.63±0.09 ab | 97.58±2.27 b | 6.07±0.16 a | 74.89±3.36 b | 240.05±2.47 a |
T2 | 14.63±1.20 a | 1.91±0.21 a | 115.78±1.59 a | 6.11±0.09 a | 103.06±3.17 a | 219.65±3.62 b |
Table 7 Fruit quality of Chinese bayberry under different treatments
处理Treatment | TSS/% | Fir/N | TS/(mg·g-1) | TA/(mg·g-1) | SS/(mg·g-1) | Ant/(μg·g-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 10.33±0.45 b | 1.46±0.07 b | 68.78±1.02 c | 4.68±0.18 b | 63.27±1.68 c | 129.65±2.10 c |
T1 | 13.17±0.37 a | 1.63±0.09 ab | 97.58±2.27 b | 6.07±0.16 a | 74.89±3.36 b | 240.05±2.47 a |
T2 | 14.63±1.20 a | 1.91±0.21 a | 115.78±1.59 a | 6.11±0.09 a | 103.06±3.17 a | 219.65±3.62 b |
[1] | ZHANG S W, YU Z P, SUN L, et al. An overview of the nutritional value, health properties, and future challenges of Chinese bayberry[J]. PeerJ, 2022, 10: e13070. |
[2] | 任海英, 郑锡良, 张淑文, 等. 杨梅衰弱病病症及病树矿质营养分析[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2020, 61(10): 2043-2048. |
REN H Y, ZHENG X L, ZHANG S W, et al. Symptom and mineral nutrition of weak diseased Chinese bayberry[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 61(10): 2043-2048. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[3] | 李晓阳, 任丽华, 计保全, 等. 生草覆盖对山地果园土壤物理性状的影响[J]. 水土保持应用技术, 2019(4): 7-9. |
LI X Y, REN L H, JI B Q, et al. Effects of grass mulching on soil physical properties in mountainous orchards[J]. Technology of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019(4): 7-9. (in Chinese) | |
[4] | 童根平, 姜霓雯, 傅伟军, 等. 清凉峰自然保护区土壤阳离子交换量的剖面分布特征及其影响因素[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2023, 51(2): 111-115. |
TONG G P, JIANG N W, FU W J, et al. Profile distribution characteristics and influencing factors of soil cation exchange capacity in low mountain natural forest land in South China[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2023, 51(2): 111-115. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[5] | 黄龙, 包维楷, 李芳兰, 等. 土壤结构和植被对土壤微生物群落的影响[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2021, 27(6): 1725-1731. |
HUANG L, BAO W K, LI F L, et al. Effects of soil structure and vegetation on microbial communities[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 2021, 27(6): 1725-1731. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[6] | 张志丹, 赵兰坡. 土壤酶在土壤有机培肥研究中的意义[J]. 土壤通报, 2006, 37(2): 2362-2368. |
ZHANG Z D, ZHAO L P. The significance of soil enzyme in studying soil fertility management[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2006, 37(2): 2362-2368. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[7] | 王宏宝, 毛佳, 曹凯歌, 等. 设施黄瓜根结线虫病发生危害与土壤酶活相关性研究[J]. 山东农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 51(4): 621-625. |
WANG H B, MAO J, CAO K G, et al. Study on the correlation between the damage of cucumber root-knot nematode disease and soil enzyme activity[J]. Journal of Shandong Agricultural University(Natural Science Edition), 2020, 51(4): 621-625. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[8] | 牛世全, 杨建文, 胡磊, 等. 河西走廊春季不同盐碱土壤中微生物数量、酶活性与理化因子的关系[J]. 微生物学通报, 2012, 39(3): 416-427. |
NIU S Q, YANG J W, HU L, et al. Relationship with soil microbial quantity, soil enzyme activity and physicochemical factor between different saline-alkali soil in Hexi Corridor in spring[J]. Microbiology China, 2012, 39(3): 416-427. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[9] | 林琛茗, 韦家少, 吴敏, 等. 土壤调理剂配施配方肥对土壤有机质及交换性能的影响[J]. 热带作物学报, 2022, 43(10): 2160-2166. |
LIN C M, WEI J S, WU M, et al. Effects of soil conditioner combined with formula fertilizer on soil organic matter and exchange performance[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2022, 43(10): 2160-2166. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[10] | 孟赐福, 曹志洪, 姜培坤, 等. 杨梅的需钾特性及施钾对杨梅的增产效应[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2006(5): 46-48. |
MENG C F, CAO Z H, JIANG P K, et al. Characteristics of potassium requirement of red bayberry and the yield increase effect of potassium application[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2006(5): 46-48. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[11] | 赵文瑞, 高双, 赵宽, 等. 腐殖酸钾对酸性土壤铝毒害的缓解作用与机制[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2023, 46(5): 185-191. |
ZHAO W R, GAO S, ZHAO K, et al. Alleviating effect and mechanism of potassium humate fertilizer on aluminum toxicity in acid soil[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2023, 46(5): 185-191. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[12] | 梁太波, 王振林, 刘兰兰, 等. 腐殖酸钾对生姜生长、钾素吸收及钾肥利用率的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2008, 22(1): 87-90. |
LIANG T B, WANG Z L, LIU L L, et al. Effects of potassium humate on growth, potassium uptake and utilization efficiency of ginger[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2008, 22(1): 87-90. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[13] | 吴昌旺, 程慧斌, 林明明, 等. 浙南山区杨梅大棚促早栽培技术研究[J]. 中国南方果树, 2021, 50(3): 100-103. |
WU C W, CHENG H B, LIN M M, et al. Study on early bearing cultivation techniques of Chinese bayberry in greenhouse in mountain areas of southern Zhejiang[J]. South China Fruits, 2021, 50(3): 100-103. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[14] | 张江伟, 李慧, 柴晓甜, 等. 玉米深松分层施肥和小麦限水灌溉对土壤微生物量碳、氮及酶活性的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022, 36(6): 346-355. |
ZHANG J W, LI H, CHAI X T, et al. Effects of fertilization with subsoiling of maize and limited irrigation of wheat on soil microbial biomass carbon, nitrogen and enzymes activities[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022, 36(6): 346-355. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[15] | 彭健健, 徐坚, 王晓晓, 等. 杨梅主产区土壤肥力空间异质性及其影响因素: 以浙江仙居和临海为例[J]. 果树学报, 2023, 40(7): 1421-1433. |
PENG J J, XU J, WANG X X, et al. Spatial variation of soil fertility and its influencing factors in Myrica rubra region: a case study in Xianju County and Linhai City[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2023, 40(7): 1421-1433. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[16] | 田祥珅, 郑重谊, 刘勇军, 等. 稻作烟区土壤电导率和阳离子交换量的垂直分布特征与养分有效性的关系[J]. 西南农业学报, 2021, 34(12): 2700-2706. |
TIAN X S, ZHENG Z Y, LIU Y J, et al. Vertical distribution of electrical conductivity and cation exchange capacity in soil and their relationship with nutrient availability in rice-growing tobacco areas[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 34(12): 2700-2706. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[17] | 白岗栓, 何登峰, 耿伟, 等. 不同保水剂对土壤特性及烤烟生长的影响[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2020, 25(10): 31-43. |
BAI G S, HE D F, GENG W, et al. Effects of different super absorbent polymer on soil characteristics and flue-cured tobacco growth[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2020, 25(10): 31-43. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[18] | 孙焕顷, 苏长青. 腐植酸钾对黄冠梨土壤肥力的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2009(7): 100-101. |
SUN H Q, SU C Q. Effects of potassium humate on soil fertilizers in Huangguan pears[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2009(7): 100-101. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[19] | 王锋, 王汝娟, 陈晓光, 等. 不同类型钾肥对甘薯钾素积累和利用率的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2009, 41(10): 77-80. |
WANG F, WANG R J, CHEN X G, et al. Effects of different kinds of potassium fertilizers on potassium accumulation and use efficiency in sweet potato[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2009, 41(10): 77-80. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[20] | POWLSON D S, PROOKES P C, CHRISTENSEN B T. Measurement of soil microbial biomass provides an early indication of changes in total soil organic matter due to straw incorporation[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1987, 19(2): 159-164. |
[21] | 吴晓玲, 张世熔, 蒲玉琳, 等. 川西平原土壤微生物生物量碳氮磷含量特征及其影响因素分析[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2019, 27(10): 1607-1616. |
WU X L, ZHANG S R, PU Y L, et al. Distribution characteristics and impact factors of soil microbial biomass carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in western Sichuan Plain[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2019, 27(10): 1607-1616. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[22] | 景宇鹏, 高日平, 陈玉海, 等. 河套平原盐碱化土壤有机碳及微生物量碳剖面分布特征[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2022(10): 11-19. |
JING Y P, GAO R P, CHEN Y H, et al. Distribution characteristics of organic carbon and microbial carbon in saline-alkali soil in the Hetao Plain[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2022(10): 11-19. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[23] | 李俊杰, 邹洪琴, 许发辉, 等. 土壤微生物量氮对小麦各生育期氮素形态的调控[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2021, 27(8): 1321-1329. |
LI J J, ZOU H Q, XU F H, et al. Regulation of soil microbial biomass nitrogen on nitrogen forms in different growth stages of wheat[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2021, 27(8): 1321-1329. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[24] | 朱海云, 马瑜, 柯杨, 等. 不同年龄时期石榴园土壤养分、微生物量及酶活性[J]. 土壤通报, 2022, 53(3): 588-595. |
ZHU H Y, MA Y, KE Y, et al. Soil nutrients, microbial quantities and enzyme activities in the pomegranate orchards with different age stages[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2022, 53(3): 588-595. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[25] | 高佳, 王姣, 王松, 等. 生物炭基肥对马铃薯田土壤脲酶活性和产量的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2021(6): 134-138. |
GAO J, WANG J, WANG S, et al. Effects of biochar-based fertilizer on soil urease activity and yield of potato[J]. Crops, 2021(6): 134-138. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[26] | 孙慧, 张建锋, 胡颖, 等. 土壤过氧化氢酶对不同林分覆盖的响应[J]. 土壤通报, 2016, 47(3): 605-610. |
SUN H, ZHANG J F, HU Y, et al. Research on the response of soil catalase to different forest stand covers[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2016, 47(3): 605-610. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[27] | 孙建波, 畅文军, 李文彬, 等. 香蕉不同生育期根际微生物生物量及土壤酶活的变化研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(6): 1169-1174. |
SUN J B, CHANG W J, LI W B, et al. Dynamics of soil microbial biomass and enzyme activities in rhizosphere soil at different growing stages of banana[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2022, 31(6): 1169-1174. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[28] | 吕丽霞, 王秀荣, 王维, 等. 自然生草对冀西北杏园土壤微生物量碳、氮及酶活性的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2023(7): 79-86. |
LYU L X, WANG X R, WANG W, et al. Effects of natural grass on soil microbial biomass carbon, nitrogen and enzyme activities in apricot orchards in northwest Hebei[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2023(7): 79-86. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[29] | 肖依玲, 王胜男. 钾对果树品质影响研究进展[J]. 种子科技, 2019, 37(10): 129-130. |
XIAO Y L, WANG S N. Research progress on effects of potassium on fruit quality[J]. Seed Science & Technology, 2019, 37(10): 129-130. (in Chinese) | |
[30] | 周敏, 毛曦, 陈环, 等. 葡萄钾营养及其在果实中积累的研究进展[J]. 果树学报, 2017, 34(6): 752-761. |
ZHOU M, MAO X, CHEN H, et al. Research advances on potassium nutrition and berry accumulation in grapevines[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2017, 34(6): 752-761. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[31] | 张东东, 李琪, 储宝华, 等. 追施钾肥对苹果叶片光合作用、矿质营养及果实品质的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 51(4): 102-109. |
ZHANG D D, LI Q, CHU B H, et al. Effects of topdressing potassium fertilizer on photosynthesis, mineral nutrition of apple leaves and fruit quality[J]. Journal of Northwest A & F University(Natural Science Edition), 2023, 51(4): 102-109. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[32] | SHEN C W, SHI X Q, XIE C Y, et al. The change in microstructure of petioles and peduncles and transporter gene expression by potassium influences the distribution of nutrients and sugars in pear leaves and fruit[J]. Journal of Plant Physiology, 2019, 232: 320-333. |
[33] | 俞明亮. 苹果花青苷色素的形成[J]. 北方果树, 1992(4): 34-36. |
YU M L. Formation of apple anthocyanin pigment[J]. Northern Fruits, 1992(4): 34-36. (in Chinese) | |
[34] | 郭秀珠, 姜武, 黄品湖, 等. 钾镁肥配施对杨梅品质和矿质营养的影响[J]. 中国南方果树, 2017, 46(3): 72-75. |
GUO X Z, JIANG W, HUANG P H, et al. Effects of combined application of potassium and magnesium fertilizer on quality and mineral nutrition of Myrica rubra[J]. South China Fruits, 2017, 46(3): 72-75. (in Chinese) |
[1] | ZHU Xuehui, XIE Hui, HAN Shouan, WANG Min, BAI Shijian, MA Yunlong, WANG Yanmeng, MAI Sile, PAN Mingqi, ZHANG Wen. Effect of two plant growth regulators on the fruit quality of ‘Centennial Seedless’ grapes [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(6): 1309-1319. |
[2] | WANG Ying, WANG Jian, FENG Zishan, WANG Baogen, WU Xinyi, LU Zhongfu, SUN Yuyan, DONG Wenqi, LI Guojing, WU Xiaohua. Factor analysis and comprehensive evaluation of the fruit quality of bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria) [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(2): 334-343. |
[3] | LUO Shasha, WANG Ruyue, ZHEN Ziyi, WU Jialong, XU Yeyong, Bahetiyaer KERIM, SUN Yali, HU Haifang. Effect of irrigation time and amount on cracking rate and quality of apricot plum fruit [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(2): 365-372. |
[4] | YUE Zongwei, LI Jiaxiao, SUN Xiangyang, LIU Guoliang, LI Suyan, WANG Chenchen, ZHA Guichao, WEI Ningxian. Effects of chemical fertilizer combined with organic fertilizer on soil properties, cherry fruit quality and yield [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(9): 2192-2201. |
[5] | ZHENG Xiliang, LIANG Senmiao, YU Zheping, REN Haiying, SUN Li, LIN Rui, ZHANG Shuwen, QI Xingjiang. Quantitative evaluation indicators of Chinese bayberry tree health status [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(9): 1945-1954. |
[6] | ZHENG Yuanyua, YU Zheping, ZHANG Shuwen, LI Yougui, SUN Li, ZHENG Xiliang, QI Xingjiang. Effect of alcohol extracts from Chinese bayberry branch on proliferation and apoptosis of A375 cells and its molecular mechanism [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(5): 974-983. |
[7] | ZHAO Yuhong, HE Wen, LI Gen, WANG Qiang, XIE Rui, WANG Yan, CHEN Qing, WANG Xiaorong. Fruit quality of Citrus maxima (Burm.) Merrill and its bud mutants varieties in Sichuan area [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(5): 995-1004. |
[8] | CAI Jiye, FANG Xiangjun, HAN Yanchao, DING Yuting, CHEN Hangjun, WU Weijie, GAO Haiyan. Effect controlled atmosphere storage on postharvest preservation of Dongkui bayberry [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(2): 352-359. |
[9] | HAO Jinlian, YANG Yuqi, WANG Ru, YANG Mengsi, LIAO Chenyu, CHEN Hong, HU Haifang. Effects of different harvest time on quality of walnut varieties Wen 185 and Xinxin 2 [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(10): 2188-2198. |
[10] | WU Jiawei, YAO Zhangliang, HU Qiqi, ZHANG Jie, CHEN Yi, JIANG Jianrong, ZHOU Guoxin, WANG Xia. Fungicides and optimum time for control of pear rust in Tongxiang City, north Zhejiang, China [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(9): 1668-1675. |
[11] | ZHANG Zhigang, LIU Yufang, LI Changcheng, LI Hong, CHENG Ping, YANG Lu. Effect of different maturity on fruit quality of apricot [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(8): 1402-1408. |
[12] | WANG Yingzhen, PAN Zhimei. Comprehensive evaluation of 22 Actinidia eriantha germplasm resources based on principal components analysis [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(5): 825-830. |
[13] | LI Qingbin, QIN Benben, LI Yingying, FAN Kaifeng, YANG Dong, CHEN Lei, LIU Kun. Effects of continuous rain and sunless weather on microclimate, strawberry growth and quality in greenhouse [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(5): 831-839. |
[14] | LIANG Le, LIU Juan, LI Xiaomei, LIAO Jichao, LI Huanxiu, TANG Yi. Effects of intercropping with different genotypes of cherry tomato on fruit quality and selenium content [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(10): 1870-1878. |
[15] | DENG Qian, WANG Yang, DENG Qunxian, XIN Yaning, LI Lei, LONG Xingyu, ZHU Jin, ZHANG Huifen, XIA Hui, LIANG Dong. Fruit development regulation and quality accumulation characteristics analysis of Zizyphus jujuba cv. Shucuizao [J]. , 2020, 32(4): 644-652. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||