Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis ›› 2024, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (3): 579-588.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20230859
• Plant Protection • Previous Articles Next Articles
Identification and biological characteristics of pathogen causing branch dieback on Styphnolobium japonicum (L.) Schott
LUO Zhihan1(
), LIU Pengfei1, YU Jun2, QI He3, CHEN Xiaoguang4, LOU Binggan1,*()
- 1. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs Key Lab of Molecular Biology of Crop Pathogens and Insects, Institute of Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
2. College of Plant Science, Tarim University, Alar 843399,Xinjiang, China
3. Forestry and Grassland Administration of Bayingol Mongolian Autonomous Prefecture, Korla 841000, Xinjiang, China
4. Landscaping Affair Center of Korla,Korla 841000, Xinjiang, China
-
Received:2023-07-13Online:2024-03-25Published:2024-04-09
CLC Number:
Cite this article
LUO Zhihan, LIU Pengfei, YU Jun, QI He, CHEN Xiaoguang, LOU Binggan. Identification and biological characteristics of pathogen causing branch dieback on Styphnolobium japonicum (L.) Schott[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(3): 579-588.
share this article
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.zjnyxb.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20230859
Table 1 Primers for amplification of gene fragments
| 基因 Gene | 引物名称 Primer | 核苷酸序列 Nucleotide sequence |
|---|---|---|
| rDNA-ITS | ITS1 | 5'-TCCGTAGGTGAACCTGCGG-3' |
| ITS4 | 5'-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3' | |
| EF1-α | EF1-728F | 5'-CATCGAGAAGTTCGAGAAGG-3' |
| EF1-986R | 5'-TACTTGAAGGAACCCTTACC-3' | |
| LSU | LROR | 5'-ACCCGCTGAACTTAAGC-3' |
| LR5 | 5'-TCCTGAGGGAAACTTCG-3' |
Table 1 Primers for amplification of gene fragments
| 基因 Gene | 引物名称 Primer | 核苷酸序列 Nucleotide sequence |
|---|---|---|
| rDNA-ITS | ITS1 | 5'-TCCGTAGGTGAACCTGCGG-3' |
| ITS4 | 5'-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3' | |
| EF1-α | EF1-728F | 5'-CATCGAGAAGTTCGAGAAGG-3' |
| EF1-986R | 5'-TACTTGAAGGAACCCTTACC-3' | |
| LSU | LROR | 5'-ACCCGCTGAACTTAAGC-3' |
| LR5 | 5'-TCCTGAGGGAAACTTCG-3' |
Table 2 Botryosphaeriaceae isolates used in the phylogenetic analyses with its GenBank accession number
| 菌株名称 Strain | 序列登录号GenBank accession numbers | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| rDNA-ITS | EF1-α | LSU | |
| GH01 | OP379832 | OQ136617 | OP389048 |
| GH02 | OQ096643 | OQ586044 | OQ127403 |
| GH03 | OQ096644 | OQ586045 | OQ127404 |
| GH04 | OQ096645 | OQ586046 | OQ127405 |
| GH05 | OQ096646 | OQ586047 | OQ127406 |
| GH06 | OQ096647 | OQ586048 | OQ127407 |
| GH07 | OQ096648 | OQ586049 | OQ127408 |
| GH08 | OQ096649 | OQ586050 | OQ127409 |
| GH09 | OQ096650 | OQ586051 | OQ127410 |
| GH10 | OQ096651 | OQ586052 | OQ127411 |
| GH11 | OQ096652 | OQ586053 | OQ127412 |
| GH12 | OQ096653 | OQ586054 | OQ127413 |
| GH13 | OQ096654 | OQ586055 | OQ127414 |
| GH14 | OQ096655 | OQ586056 | OQ127415 |
| GH15 | OQ096656 | OQ586057 | OQ127416 |
| GH16 | OQ096657 | OQ586058 | OQ127417 |
| 7b | OL376284 | OL455961 | OL376301 |
| BMP13 | MN067769 | MN078938 | MK968808 |
| CBS 115206 | KF766226 | GU349030 | DQ377882 |
| MFLUCC 17-0359 | MK480514 | MK495819 | MK478925 |
| Mlty_Ma02 | MT195553 | MT362603 | MT195555 |
| NeNo1 | KX370828 | MF662595 | MH899579 |
| PTD-MA | MW605153 | MW605154 | MW605155 |
| URF_Pt01 | MT010216 | MT362600 | MT010293 |
| CBS456.78 | KF766192 | EF622063 | KF766362 |
| CMW 26167 | EU144055 | EU144070 | KF766333 |
Table 2 Botryosphaeriaceae isolates used in the phylogenetic analyses with its GenBank accession number
| 菌株名称 Strain | 序列登录号GenBank accession numbers | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| rDNA-ITS | EF1-α | LSU | |
| GH01 | OP379832 | OQ136617 | OP389048 |
| GH02 | OQ096643 | OQ586044 | OQ127403 |
| GH03 | OQ096644 | OQ586045 | OQ127404 |
| GH04 | OQ096645 | OQ586046 | OQ127405 |
| GH05 | OQ096646 | OQ586047 | OQ127406 |
| GH06 | OQ096647 | OQ586048 | OQ127407 |
| GH07 | OQ096648 | OQ586049 | OQ127408 |
| GH08 | OQ096649 | OQ586050 | OQ127409 |
| GH09 | OQ096650 | OQ586051 | OQ127410 |
| GH10 | OQ096651 | OQ586052 | OQ127411 |
| GH11 | OQ096652 | OQ586053 | OQ127412 |
| GH12 | OQ096653 | OQ586054 | OQ127413 |
| GH13 | OQ096654 | OQ586055 | OQ127414 |
| GH14 | OQ096655 | OQ586056 | OQ127415 |
| GH15 | OQ096656 | OQ586057 | OQ127416 |
| GH16 | OQ096657 | OQ586058 | OQ127417 |
| 7b | OL376284 | OL455961 | OL376301 |
| BMP13 | MN067769 | MN078938 | MK968808 |
| CBS 115206 | KF766226 | GU349030 | DQ377882 |
| MFLUCC 17-0359 | MK480514 | MK495819 | MK478925 |
| Mlty_Ma02 | MT195553 | MT362603 | MT195555 |
| NeNo1 | KX370828 | MF662595 | MH899579 |
| PTD-MA | MW605153 | MW605154 | MW605155 |
| URF_Pt01 | MT010216 | MT362600 | MT010293 |
| CBS456.78 | KF766192 | EF622063 | KF766362 |
| CMW 26167 | EU144055 | EU144070 | KF766333 |
Fig.1 Infection symptoms of branch dieback on S. japonicum A-C,Symptoms on current-year twigs ; D, Branches dieback, leaves falling off; E, Visible black protrusions on epidermis surface ; F, Black conidia formed under the epidermis; G, Most of the shoots are diseased and dry; H, Trees about to die completely.
Fig.1 Infection symptoms of branch dieback on S. japonicum A-C,Symptoms on current-year twigs ; D, Branches dieback, leaves falling off; E, Visible black protrusions on epidermis surface ; F, Black conidia formed under the epidermis; G, Most of the shoots are diseased and dry; H, Trees about to die completely.
Fig.2 Results of pathogenicity test of conidia and mycelial plugs on S. japonicum branch A, Sprayed conidial; B, Sprayed sterile water; C, Mycelial inoculation; D, PDA medium control.
Fig.2 Results of pathogenicity test of conidia and mycelial plugs on S. japonicum branch A, Sprayed conidial; B, Sprayed sterile water; C, Mycelial inoculation; D, PDA medium control.
Fig.3 Morphology characters of isolates pathogen A, Cultured with PDA medium for 2 d; B, Cultured with PDA medium for 7 d; C, Mycelium; D, Arthrospore; E-F, Septospore and single septospore ;G, Double septospore; H, Lattice spore.
Fig.3 Morphology characters of isolates pathogen A, Cultured with PDA medium for 2 d; B, Cultured with PDA medium for 7 d; C, Mycelium; D, Arthrospore; E-F, Septospore and single septospore ;G, Double septospore; H, Lattice spore.
Table 3 Effects of different culture media on mycelial growth and sporulation of Neoscytalidium dimidiatum isolate GH01
| 培养基 Medium | 菌落直径 Colony diameter/cm | 产孢数量 Spore yield/105 |
|---|---|---|
| 马铃薯葡萄糖琼脂培养基 | 3.69±0.09 a | 166.40±34.26 a |
| Potato dextrose agar, PDA | ||
| 固体查氏培养基Czapek | 3.74±0.11 a | 21.20±3.92 c |
| 甘薯葡萄糖琼脂培养基 | 3.70±0.16 a | 17.80±3.31 c |
| Sweet potato dextrose agar, SPDA | ||
| 玉米粒琼脂培养基 | 3.32±0.18 b | 68.60±16.70 b |
| Corn meal agar, CMA | ||
| 基本培养基 | 2.98±0.19 c | 27.00±7.82 c |
| Complete medium, CM | ||
| 燕麦片琼脂培养基 | 2.62±0.24 d | 85.60±18.78 b |
| Oat meal agar, OA | ||
| 改良营养琼脂培养基 | 2.29±0.14 e | 16.20±3.92 c |
| Nutrient agar, NA | ||
| 水琼脂培养基 | 1.94±0.13 f | 2.00±0.67 d |
| Water agar, WA |
Table 3 Effects of different culture media on mycelial growth and sporulation of Neoscytalidium dimidiatum isolate GH01
| 培养基 Medium | 菌落直径 Colony diameter/cm | 产孢数量 Spore yield/105 |
|---|---|---|
| 马铃薯葡萄糖琼脂培养基 | 3.69±0.09 a | 166.40±34.26 a |
| Potato dextrose agar, PDA | ||
| 固体查氏培养基Czapek | 3.74±0.11 a | 21.20±3.92 c |
| 甘薯葡萄糖琼脂培养基 | 3.70±0.16 a | 17.80±3.31 c |
| Sweet potato dextrose agar, SPDA | ||
| 玉米粒琼脂培养基 | 3.32±0.18 b | 68.60±16.70 b |
| Corn meal agar, CMA | ||
| 基本培养基 | 2.98±0.19 c | 27.00±7.82 c |
| Complete medium, CM | ||
| 燕麦片琼脂培养基 | 2.62±0.24 d | 85.60±18.78 b |
| Oat meal agar, OA | ||
| 改良营养琼脂培养基 | 2.29±0.14 e | 16.20±3.92 c |
| Nutrient agar, NA | ||
| 水琼脂培养基 | 1.94±0.13 f | 2.00±0.67 d |
| Water agar, WA |
Fig.4 Phylogenetic tree of S. japonica pathogens and other Botryosphaeriales strains based on combined ITS-EF1α-LSU sequences
Fig.4 Phylogenetic tree of S. japonica pathogens and other Botryosphaeriales strains based on combined ITS-EF1α-LSU sequences
Fig.5 Effects of different temperature on mycelial growth and sporulation of Neoscytalidium dimidiatum isolate GH01 Same color blocks marked without the same lowercase letters indicate signficant (P<0.05) difference.
Fig.5 Effects of different temperature on mycelial growth and sporulation of Neoscytalidium dimidiatum isolate GH01 Same color blocks marked without the same lowercase letters indicate signficant (P<0.05) difference.
Fig.6 Effects of different relative humidity on spores’ germination of Neoscytalidium dimidiatum isolate GH01 Dots marked without the same lowercase letters indicate signficant (P<0.05) difference.
Fig.6 Effects of different relative humidity on spores’ germination of Neoscytalidium dimidiatum isolate GH01 Dots marked without the same lowercase letters indicate signficant (P<0.05) difference.
Fig.7 Effects of different pH value on mycelial growth and sporulation of Neoscytalidium dimidiatum isolate GH01 Data in the same line without the same lowercase letters indicate signficant (P<0.05) difference.
Fig.7 Effects of different pH value on mycelial growth and sporulation of Neoscytalidium dimidiatum isolate GH01 Data in the same line without the same lowercase letters indicate signficant (P<0.05) difference.
Table 4 Effects of different C sources on mycelial growth and sporulation of Neoscytalidium dimidiatum isolate GH01
| 碳源 C sources | 菌落直径 Colony diameter/cm | 干重 Dry weight/mg | 产孢数量 Spore yield/105 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 甘露糖Mannose | 5.95±0.16 a | 218.50±5.20 a | 24.01±1.62 d |
| 果糖Fructose | 4.82±0.26 b | 219.70±9.00 a | 37.26±0.89 b |
| 半乳糖Galactose | 4.47±0.41 c | 204.30±1.50 c | 11.21±0.30 gh |
| 蔗糖Sucrose | 4.38±0.16 c | 205.00±0.50 c | 13.37±1.24 fg |
| 葡萄糖Glucose | 4.35±0.26 c | 207.20±3.00 ab | 14.57±1.02 f |
| 乳糖Lactose | 3.97±0.17 d | 198.40±1.90 cd | 30.88±0.83 c |
| 麦芽糖Maltose | 3.95±0.46 d | 216.80±7.20 ab | 9.52±0.41 h |
| 可溶性淀粉Soluble starch | 3.77±0.09 d | 198.00±1.50 cd | 14.10±0.83 f |
| 阿拉伯糖Arabinose | 3.44±0.24 e | 190.50±2.70 de | 16.83±1.55 e |
| CK | 3.11±0.12 f | 178.00±3.50 de | 125.97±1.39 a |
| 甘油Glycerol | 3.11±0.28 f | 207.20±3.00 de | 10.48±0.41 h |
| 木糖Xylose | 3.07±0.30 f | 191.10±6.20 de | 10.48±0.41 h |
| 山梨糖Sorbose | 1.82±0.29 g | 185.30±2.00 e | 24.77±1.28 d |
Table 4 Effects of different C sources on mycelial growth and sporulation of Neoscytalidium dimidiatum isolate GH01
| 碳源 C sources | 菌落直径 Colony diameter/cm | 干重 Dry weight/mg | 产孢数量 Spore yield/105 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 甘露糖Mannose | 5.95±0.16 a | 218.50±5.20 a | 24.01±1.62 d |
| 果糖Fructose | 4.82±0.26 b | 219.70±9.00 a | 37.26±0.89 b |
| 半乳糖Galactose | 4.47±0.41 c | 204.30±1.50 c | 11.21±0.30 gh |
| 蔗糖Sucrose | 4.38±0.16 c | 205.00±0.50 c | 13.37±1.24 fg |
| 葡萄糖Glucose | 4.35±0.26 c | 207.20±3.00 ab | 14.57±1.02 f |
| 乳糖Lactose | 3.97±0.17 d | 198.40±1.90 cd | 30.88±0.83 c |
| 麦芽糖Maltose | 3.95±0.46 d | 216.80±7.20 ab | 9.52±0.41 h |
| 可溶性淀粉Soluble starch | 3.77±0.09 d | 198.00±1.50 cd | 14.10±0.83 f |
| 阿拉伯糖Arabinose | 3.44±0.24 e | 190.50±2.70 de | 16.83±1.55 e |
| CK | 3.11±0.12 f | 178.00±3.50 de | 125.97±1.39 a |
| 甘油Glycerol | 3.11±0.28 f | 207.20±3.00 de | 10.48±0.41 h |
| 木糖Xylose | 3.07±0.30 f | 191.10±6.20 de | 10.48±0.41 h |
| 山梨糖Sorbose | 1.82±0.29 g | 185.30±2.00 e | 24.77±1.28 d |
Table 5 Effects of different N sources on mycelial growth and sporulation of Neoscytalidium dimidiatum isolate GH01
| 氮源 N sources | 菌落直径 Colony diameter/cm | 干重 Dry weight/mg | 产孢数量 Spore yield/105 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 牛肉膏Beef Extract | 4.63±0.12 a | 252.60±6.00 a | 53.61±0.44 c |
| CK | 4.22±0.20 b | 180.60±9.00 e | 20.05±0.87 e |
| 蛋白胨Peptone | 4.11±0.14 bc | 243.10±4.90 ab | 138.10±0.70 a |
| 氯化铵NH4Cl | 4.05±0.10 cd | 212.10±2.00 c | 8.85±0.65 i |
| 硫酸铵(NH4)2SO4 | 3.69±0.09 cd | 230.00±7.40 b | 15.30±0.50 f |
| 苯丙氨酸Phenylalanine | 3.87±0.34 de | 202.00±4.90 cd | 137.43±1.23 a |
| 硝酸铵NH4NO3 | 3.78±0.13 e | 193.00±6.00 de | 13.24±0.88 g |
| 硝酸钠NaNO3 | 3.76±0.17 ef | 191.70±6.30 de | 13.24±0.88 g |
| 草酸铵(NH4)2C2O4 | 3.61±0.18 g | 191.80±6.60 de | 84.87±0.66 b |
| 甘氨酸Glycine | 3.60±0.20 g | 178.50±6.00 e | 10.25±0.89 hi |
| 精氨酸Arginine | 3.39±0.13 h | 236.10±4.00 b | 42.08±0.82 d |
| 硝酸钾KNO3 | 3.29±0.22 h | 185.90±4.10 e | 11.64±0.46 h |
| 尿素Urea | 1.90±0.12 i | 149.40±7.30 f | 8.65±0.46 i |
Table 5 Effects of different N sources on mycelial growth and sporulation of Neoscytalidium dimidiatum isolate GH01
| 氮源 N sources | 菌落直径 Colony diameter/cm | 干重 Dry weight/mg | 产孢数量 Spore yield/105 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 牛肉膏Beef Extract | 4.63±0.12 a | 252.60±6.00 a | 53.61±0.44 c |
| CK | 4.22±0.20 b | 180.60±9.00 e | 20.05±0.87 e |
| 蛋白胨Peptone | 4.11±0.14 bc | 243.10±4.90 ab | 138.10±0.70 a |
| 氯化铵NH4Cl | 4.05±0.10 cd | 212.10±2.00 c | 8.85±0.65 i |
| 硫酸铵(NH4)2SO4 | 3.69±0.09 cd | 230.00±7.40 b | 15.30±0.50 f |
| 苯丙氨酸Phenylalanine | 3.87±0.34 de | 202.00±4.90 cd | 137.43±1.23 a |
| 硝酸铵NH4NO3 | 3.78±0.13 e | 193.00±6.00 de | 13.24±0.88 g |
| 硝酸钠NaNO3 | 3.76±0.17 ef | 191.70±6.30 de | 13.24±0.88 g |
| 草酸铵(NH4)2C2O4 | 3.61±0.18 g | 191.80±6.60 de | 84.87±0.66 b |
| 甘氨酸Glycine | 3.60±0.20 g | 178.50±6.00 e | 10.25±0.89 hi |
| 精氨酸Arginine | 3.39±0.13 h | 236.10±4.00 b | 42.08±0.82 d |
| 硝酸钾KNO3 | 3.29±0.22 h | 185.90±4.10 e | 11.64±0.46 h |
| 尿素Urea | 1.90±0.12 i | 149.40±7.30 f | 8.65±0.46 i |
| [1] | 孙昱, 彭祚登. 国槐的历史文化与价值研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报(社会科学版), 2018, 17(2):23-31. |
| SUN Y, PENG Z D. Insights into History Culture and Value of Sophora japonica[J]. Journal of beijing forestry university social sciences, 2018, 17(2):23-31. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [2] | 方中达. 植病研究方法[M]. 3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1998. |
| [3] | ALIZADEH M, SAFAIE N, SHAMS-BAKHSH M, et al. Neo- scytalidium novaehollandiae causes dieback on Pinus eldarica and its potential for infection of urban forest trees[J]. Scientific Reports, 2022, 12: 9337. |
| [4] | PAVLIC D, WINGFIELD M J, BARBER P, et al. Seven new species of the Botryosphaeriaceae from baobab and other native trees in Western Australia[J]. Mycologia, 2008, 100(6): 851-866. |
| [5] | CHI M H, PARK S Y, LEE Y H. A quick and safe method for fungal DNA extraction[J]. The Plant Pathology Journal, 2009, 25(1): 108-111. |
| [6] | QUIMBITA-REYES A M, CABRERA-ASENCIO I, SERRATO-DIAZ L M, et al. First report of Lasiodiplodia mahajangana causing canker of mango (Mangifera indica) in Puerto Rico[J]. Plant Disease, 2022. |
| [7] | TRIPATHI A, RAI A, DUBEY S C, et al. DNA barcode, multiplex PCR and qPCR assay for diagnosis of pathogens infecting pulse crops to facilitate safe exchange and healthy conservation of germplasm[J]. Archives of Microbiology, 2021, 203(5): 2575-2589. |
| [8] | Schoch C L, Crous P W, Groenewald J Z, et al. A class-wide phylogenetic assessment of Dothideomycetes[J]. Studies in Mycology, 2009, 64:1-15. |
| [9] | SENWANNA C, HONGSANAN S, HYDE K D, et al. First report of the sexual morph of Pseudofusicoccum adansoniae pavlic, T.I.Burgess & M.J.Wingf. on Para rubber[J]. Cryptogamie, Mycologie, 2020, 41(7): 133. |
| [10] | JAMALI S. Morphological and molecular characterization of Neoscytalidium novaehollandiae, the cause of Quercus brantii dieback in Iran[J]. Phytopathologia Mediterranea, 2019, 58(2): 1-9. |
| [11] | DERVIŞ S, ÖZER G, TÜRKÖLMEZ Ş. First report of Neoscytalidium dimidiatum causing tuber rot of potato in Turkey[J]. Journal of Plant Pathology, 2020, 102(4): 1295-1296. |
| [12] | ALVES A, CROUS P W, CORREIA A, et al. Morphological and molecular data reveal cryptic speciation in Lasiodiplodia theobromae[J]. Fungal Diversity, 2008, 28: 1-13. |
| [13] | SLIPPERS B, BOISSIN E, PHILLIPS A J L, et al. Phylogenetic lineages in the Botryosphaeriales: a systematic and evolutionary framework[J]. Studies in Mycology, 2013, 76(1): 31-49. |
| [14] | CROUS P W, SLIPPERS B, WINGFIELD M J, et al. Phylogenetic lineages in the Botryosphaeriaceae[J]. Studies in Mycology, 2006, 55: 235-253. |
| [15] | ZHANG W, GROENEWALD J Z, LOMBARD L, et al. Evaluating species in Botryosphaeriales[J]. Persoonia, 2021, 46: 63-115. |
| [16] | NOURIAN A, SALEHI M, SAFAIE N, et al. Fungal canker agents in apple production hubs of Iran[J]. Scientific Reports, 2021, 11: 22646. |
| [17] | OKSAL E, ÖZER G. First report of shoot blight and branch canker of Pyrus communis by Neoscytalidium novaehollandiae in Turkey[J]. Journal of Plant Pathology, 2021, 103(2): 673-674. |
| [18] | KAZEMZADEH CHAKUSARY M, MOHAMMADI H, KHODAPARAST S A. Diversity and pathogenicity of Botryosphaeriaceae species on forest trees in the north of Iran[J]. European Journal of Forest Research, 2019, 138(4): 685-704. |
| [19] | AKGÜL D S, SAVAŞ N G, ÖZARSLANDAN M. First report of wood canker caused by Lasiodiplodia exigua and Neoscytalidium novaehollandiae on grapevine in Turkey[J]. Plant Disease, 2019, 103(5): 1036. |
| [20] | ÖREN E, KOCA G, GENCER R, et al. First report of Neoscytalidium novaehollandiae associated with stem canker and branch dieback of almond trees[J]. Australasian Plant Disease Notes, 2020, 15(1): 17. |
| [21] | ÖREN E, PALACıOĞLU G, OZAN G N, et al. First report of Neoscytalidium novaehollandiae associated with branch dieback and stem cankers on plum in Turkey[J]. Journal of Plant Pathology, 2022, 104(3): 1167. |
| [1] | SHEN Guoqiang, WANG Mingde, GUAN Yawen, WU Jun, WANG Hanrong. Identification, biological characteristics and control agents screening of pathogens of curvular leaf spot disease of sorghum [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(7): 1492-1500. |
| [2] | LIU Pengfei, ZHANG Shuhan, HONG Kai, SHAO Yue, LOU Binggan. Isolation and identification of the pathogen causing tomato canker in Zhejiang Province of China [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(6): 1293-1300. |
| [3] | WANG Chao, LI Yanjie, NIU Yun, WEN Lianhao, CHEN Jingjing, WU Hongzhi, YANG Yuyong, WU Yandi. Biological characterization of black spot pathogens in Rosa chinensis and evaluation of varietal resistance [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(5): 1087-1096. |
| [4] | JI Mengting, CHEN Changjiang, ZHU Ling, ZHAN Menglin, XIAO Shun, CAI Xueqing. Identification of etiological bacterium causing leaf spot disease on Ficus carica [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(5): 1097-1106. |
| [5] | LI Yani, CHEN Weiliang, MAO Bizeng. Pathogen identification of root rot of Curcuma wenyujin [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(5): 1086-1093. |
| [6] | PAN Changmang, WANG Yushan, HUANG Qiuyue, HE Jianqing, BASANG Wangmu, ZHANG Gejie. Identification and biological characteristics of Hericium cirrhatum [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(10): 2229-2237. |
| [7] | FENG Lianrong, ZHANG Yan, ZHAO Xinwen, SONG Lizhi, LIANG Dejun. Isolation, identification and biological characteristics of a wild Flammulina filiformis strain [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(5): 1088-1096. |
| [8] | SUN Shanshan, CHEMI Lhamo, LI Qiang, ZENG Nanfang, ZHENG Cheng, ZHANG Baiyu, YAN Qigui. Construction and biological characteristics of a recombinant pseudorabies virus expressing GP5-M of PRRSV NADC30-like virus strain [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(11): 2555-2567. |
| [9] | WANG Zhipeng, ZHAO Jian, HUANG Pan, CUI Xuemei, NAN Li, SONG Houhui, BAO Guolian, LIU Yan. Isolation, identification and biological characteristics of rabbit-derived Escherichia coli bacteriophage [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(8): 1599-1608. |
| [10] | YANG Ling, SHA Nanjing, PAN Pengju, WU Bozhi. Identification and main biological characteristics of pathogen of Clematis leaf blight in Yunnan [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(7): 1449-1456. |
| [11] | LIU Na, FAN Qiaochu, ZHOU Jia, SONG Yajing, ZHANG Guwen, FENG Zhijuan, BO Yuanpeng, WANG Bin, GONG Yaming. Identification and control of anthracnose in vegetable soybean [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(12): 2682-2688. |
| [12] | CHEN Runchen, WANG Yining, LIU Xiaowen, WANG Hongyan, DING Qiang, WANG Honglei. Identification, artificial cultivation and nutritional analysis of wild Pholiota adiposa [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(12): 2330-2338. |
| [13] | LI Xuqing, YAN Jianli, RUAN Songlin. Identification and biological characteristics of anthracnose pathogen on Tetrastigma hemsleyanum [J]. , 2020, 32(11): 2009-2019. |
| [14] | LI Xuqing, ZHANG Jingze, ZHANG Ya, WU Genliang. Identification of pathotype of Verticillium dahlida isolates on eggplant and their biological characteristics in Shaoxing City, Zhejiang Province [J]. , 2019, 31(5): 784-789. |
| [15] | ZHOU Huiming, ZHANG Yanzhen, CHAI Hongmei, YANG Rongqing, TAN Ying, ZHANG Pingping, BAI Yuying, ZHAO Yilian, JIN Yujie. Identification and culture conditions of a wild-type Termitomyces aurantiacus strain from Lincang [J]. , 2019, 31(10): 1655-1662. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
