Effect of different drought-rewatering modes on growth and yield of Tartary buckwheat

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20231268

Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis ›› 2024, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (9): 2000-2009.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20231268

• Crop Seience • Previous Articles Next Articles

Effect of different drought-rewatering modes on growth and yield of Tartary buckwheat

MIN Jiangyan^a(), TANG Zhuolei^a^,^b, YANG Xue^a^,^b, HUANG Xiaoyan^b, HUANG Kaifeng^b^,^*(), HE Peiyun^a^,^*()

School of Life Science; b. Research Center of Buckwheat Industry Technology, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550001, China

Received:2023-11-10 Online:2024-09-25 Published:2024-09-30

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to explore the effects of different drought-rewatering treatments on the growth and yield of Tartary buckwheat [Fagopyrum tataricum(L.) Gaertn.], buckwheat variety Jinqiao 2 was used as the test material, set up five drought-rewatering treatments were set up, which were CK (soil water potential maintained at -20--30 kPa), LD (soil water potential maintained at -40--50 kPa), HD (soil water potential maintained at -60--70 kPa) and L0 (when soil water potential was -40--50 kPa, restore it to -20--30 kPa), H0 (restore it to -20--30 kPa when the soil water potential was -60--70 kPa). Agronomic traits, root morphology, antioxidant enzyme activity, photosynthetic characteristics and yield of Tartary buckwheat under different drought-rehydration modes were determined. The results showed that the agronomic traits of Tartary buckwheat increased first and then decreased with the decrease of soil water potential, which reached the maximum in LD treatment and the minimum in HD treatment. With the advancement of buckwheat fertility, the root morphology, activity of antioxidant enzymes in leaves, and photosynthetic characteristics of buckwheat after different drought-rehydration treatments showed a trend of first increasing and then decreasing; Compared with CK, LD treatment significantly increased the buckwheat root morphology indicators, HD, L0 and H0 treatments had a tendency to significantly reduce the buckwheat root morphology indicators, the root morphology indicators under all treatments had reached the maximum in the LD treatment, the minimum in the HD treatment; Compared with CK, LD treatment promoted the increase of SOD, POD and CAT activities, net photosynthetic rate, and stomatal conductance in buckwheat leaves, while HD, L0, and H0 treatments decreased the activities of antioxidant enzymes, net photosynthetic rate, and stomatal conductance in buckwheat leaves. The yield of buckwheat in LD treatment was the highest, which were 1.22, 2.17, 1.81 and 1.63 times higher than that of CK, HD, L0 and H0 treatments, respectively. In summary, LD treatment could promote the growth of buckwheat underground and aboveground, increase photosynthetic utilization, enhance the antioxidant activity, increase grain weight, to achieve the effect of water saving and yield increase.

Key words: Tartary buckwheat, drought stress, root morphology, growth and development, yield

CLC Number:

S517

MIN Jiangyan, TANG Zhuolei, YANG Xue, HUANG Xiaoyan, HUANG Kaifeng, HE Peiyun. Effect of different drought-rewatering modes on growth and yield of Tartary buckwheat[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(9): 2000-2009.

Figures/Tables 5

Table 1 Effect of soil water potential on agronomic characters of Tartary buckwheat

处理 Treatment	株高 Plant height/cm	主茎节数 Number of main stem nodes	主茎分枝数 Number of main stem branches	茎粗 Stem diameter/mm	茎长 Stem length/cm
CK	57.6 c	12.0 a	7.4 a	2.27 c	6.4 b
LD	79.5 a	12.7 a	8.0 a	2.36 b	6.7 b
HD	41.1 e	9.0 c	3.4 c	2.02 e	5.5 c
L0	62.2 b	10.7 b	6.2 b	2.18 d	7.1 a
H0	45.7 d	10.7 b	4.1 c	2.44 a	5.8 c

Fig.1 Effect of soil water potential on root morphology of Tartary buckwheat CK, LD and HD treatments maintained soil water potential at -20 kPa to -30 kPa,-40 kPa to -50 kPa,-60 kPa to -70 kPa, respectively; L0 and LD treatments indicating that when the soil water potential reached -40 kPa to -50 kPa,-60 kPa to -70 kPa, respectively, rewatering restored it to -20 kPa to -30 kPa. Different lowercase letters above the bars represented significant (P<0.05) differences among treatments. The same as below.

Fig.2 Effect of soil water potential on antioxidant enzyme activity of Tartary buckwheat

Fig.3 Effect of soil water potential on photosynthetic characteristics of Tartary buckwheat

Table 2 Effect of soil water potential on yield of Tartary buckwheat

处理 Treatment	单株粒数 Grain number per plant	单株粒重 Grain weight per plant/g	百粒重 100-grain weight/g	收获时每小区株数 Number of plants per plot at harvest	产量 Yield/(kg·hm^-2)
CK	153.32 a	2.44 a	1.66 a	64.00 d	817.54 b
LD	156.00 a	2.19 a	1.64 a	87.00 c	996.98 a
HD	61.32 d	0.76 c	1.25 c	116.00 a	458.85 e
L0	80.00 c	1.20 b	1.58 b	88.00 c	549.76 d
H0	92.00 b	1.11 b	1.55 b	106.00 b	612.62 c

References 40

[1]	SCHIMPL F C, FERREIRA M J, JAQUETTI R K, et al. Physiological responses of young Brazil nut (Bertholletia excelsa) plants to drought stress and subsequent rewatering[J]. Flora, 2019, 252: 10-17.
[2]	安玉艳, 梁宗锁. 植物应对干旱胁迫的阶段性策略[J]. 应用生态学报, 2012, 23(10): 2907-2915.
	AN Y Y, LIANG Z S. Staged strategy of plants in response to drought stress[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2012, 23(10): 2907-2915. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]	CHEN Y Z, DONG H Z. Mechanisms and regulation of senescence and maturity performance in cotton[J]. Field Crops Research, 2016, 189: 1-9.
[4]	潘饶, 曾荣斌, 李慧英, 等. 结芋期干旱胁迫对芋叶片生理特性及芋子品质产量的影响[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2023, 45(5):1183-1195.
	PAN R, ZENG R B, LI H Y, et al. Effects of drought stress on the leave physiological characteristics and corm yield and quality at tuber formation stage of taro[J]. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis, 2023, 45(5):1183-1195. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]	李硕, 李美玄, 刘英卉, 等. 干旱-复水处理对吉林文冠果幼苗生理特性和光合参数的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2023, 51(18): 134-143.
	LI S, LI M X, LIU Y H, et al. Influences of drought-rewatering on physiological characteristics and photosynthetic parameters of Xanthoceras sorbifolia seedlings in Jilin Province[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 51(18): 134-143. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]	王晓雨, 王小平, 史文宇, 等. 拔节期冬小麦光合特性、干物质积累和产量对干旱胁迫的响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2163-2172. DOI
	WANG X Y, WANG X P, SHI W Y, et al. Responses of photosynthetic characteristics, dry matter accumulation and yield to drought stress in winter wheat at jointing stage[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2163-2172. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI
[7]	ZHU Z B, LIANG Z S, HAN R L. Saikosaponin accumulation and antioxidative protection in drought-stressed Bupleurum chinense DC. plants[J]. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2009, 66(2): 326-333.
[8]	LEE B R, LI L S, JUNG W J, et al. Water deficit-induced oxidative stress and the activation of antioxidant enzymes in white clover leaves[J]. Biologia Plantarum, 2009, 53(3): 505-510.
[9]	周贵尧, 周灵燕, 邵钧炯, 等. 极端干旱对陆地生态系统的影响: 进展与展望[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(5): 515-525. DOI
	ZHOU G Y, ZHOU L Y, SHAO J J, et al. Effects of extreme drought on terrestrial ecosystems: review and prospects[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2020, 44(5): 515-525. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]	杨学乐, 张璐, 李志清, 等. 苦荞种质资源表型性状的遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2020(5): 53-58.
	YANG X L, ZHANG L, LI Z Q, et al. Diversity analysis of Tartary buckwheat germplasms based on phenotypic traits[J]. Crops, 2020(5): 53-58. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]	彭艳, 江燕, 刘代铃, 等. 有机质和微生物菌剂对苦荞连作农艺性状及土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 分子植物育种, 2023, 21(4): 1287-1293.
	PENG Y, JIANG Y, LIU D L, et al. Mitigation of organic matter and microbial inoculants on continuous cropping obstacle of Tartary buckwheat[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2023, 21(4): 1287-1293. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]	姚鑫, 刘婷婷, 阮景军, 等. H₂O₂浸种对苦荞幼苗根系生长和抗氧化酶活性的影响[J]. 分子植物育种, 2024, 22(7):2354-2360.
	YAO X, LIU T T, RUAN J J, et al. Effects of H₂O₂ Seed soaking on root growth and antioxidant enzyme activities of Tartary buckwheat (F. tataricum) seedlings[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2024, 22(7):2354-2360. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]	和爽, 牛昱婷, 丁超, 等. 荞麦七化学成分与药理作用研究进展[J]. 陕西中医药大学学报, 2023, 46(4): 19-26.
	HE S, NIU Y T, DING C, et al. Research progress on chemical components and pharmacological effects of Qiaomaiqi[J]. Journal of Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, 2023, 46(4): 19-26. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]	陈庆富. 荞麦生产状况及新类型栽培荞麦育种研究的最新进展[J]. 贵州师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 36(3): 1-7.
	CHEN Q F. The status of buckwheat production and recent progresses of breeding on new type of cultivated buckwheat[J]. Journal of Guizhou Normal University(Natural Sciences), 2018, 36(3): 1-7. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]	张余, 罗庆华, 吴兴慧, 等. 减量施氮对苦荞产量形成及氮代谢酶活性的影响[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2021, 27(1): 105-111.
	ZHANG Y, LUO Q H, WU X H, et al. Effect of reduced nitrogen application on yield formation and nitrogen metabolism enzyme activity of Tartary buckwheat[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 2021, 27(1): 105-111. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]	郭旭, 胡俊鸿, 杨婷, 等. 贵州省威宁县荞麦产业高质量发展路径研究[J]. 食品工业, 2022, 43(9): 209-212.
	GUO X, HU J H, YANG T, et al. Study on the high quality development path of buckwheat industry in Weining County, Guizhou Province[J]. The Food Industry, 2022, 43(9): 209-212. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]	周良. 干旱胁迫对苦荞产量形成和药理活性的影响[D]. 贵阳: 贵州师范大学, 2020.
	ZHOU L. Effects of drought stress on yield formation and pharmacological activity of Tartary buckwheat[D]. Guiyang: Guizhou Normal University, 2020. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]	宋毓雪, 陈小娥, 魏让, 等. 不同肥料配比对甜荞产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2014(3): 49-53.
	SONG Y X, CHEN X E, WEI R, et al. Effects of different ratios of NPK fertilizer on yield and quality of common buckwheat[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2014(3): 49-53. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]	WANG Y, ZHANG Y, LI Z Z, et al. Effect of continuous cropping on the rhizosphere soil and growth of common buckwheat[J]. Plant Production Science, 2020, 23(1): 81-90.
[20]	ZHANG Y, WU X, HUANG X, et al. Effect of nitrogen fertilizer application on grain filling of superior and inferior spikelet and yield of Tartary buckwheat[J]. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 2020, 24(6): 1409-1416.
[21]	苗青霞, 方燕, 陈应龙. 小麦根系特征对干旱胁迫的响应[J]. 植物学报, 2019, 54(5): 652-661. DOI
	MIAO Q X, FANG Y, CHEN Y L. Studies in the responses of wheat root traits to drought stress[J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2019, 54(5): 652-661. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[22]	魏清江, 冯芳芳, 马张正, 等. 干旱复水对柑橘幼苗叶片光合、叶绿素荧光和根系构型的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(8): 2485-2492. DOI
	WEI Q J, FENG F F, MA Z Z, et al. Effects of drought and rewatering on leaf photosynthesis, chlorophyll fluorescence, and root architecture of citrus seedlings[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2018, 29(8): 2485-2492. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]	LIU C G, WANG Y J, PAN K W, et al. Photosynthetic carbon and nitrogen metabolism and the relationship between their metabolites and lipid peroxidation in dwarf bamboo (Fargesia rufa Yi) during drought and subsequent recovery[J]. Trees, 2015, 29(6): 1633-1647.
[24]	HEIM R. A review of Twentieth-Century drought indices used in the United States[J]. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 2002, 83(8): 1149-1165.
[25]	赵文赛, 孙永林, 刘西平. 干旱-复水-再干旱处理对玉米光合能力和生长的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2016, 40(6): 594-603. DOI
	ZHAO W S, SUN Y L, LIU X P. Effects of drought-rewatering-drought on photosynthesis and growth of maize[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2016, 40(6): 594-603. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26]	路之娟, 张永清, 张楚. 干旱胁迫对不同苦荞品种苗期生长和根系生理特征的影响[J]. 西北植物学报, 2018, 38(1): 112-120.
	LU Z J, ZHANG Y Q, ZHANG C. The seedling growth and root physiological traits of Fagopyrum tataricum cultivars under drought stress[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2018, 38(1): 112-120. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[27]	季杨, 梁小玉, 易军, 等. 干旱: 复水对鸭茅生长及补偿效益影响研究[J]. 草学, 2017(4): 18-21.
	JI Y, LIANG X Y, YI J, et al. Effects of compensatory benefits of drought stress and rewatering on growth of orchardgrass[J]. Journal of Grassland and Forage Science, 2017(4): 18-21. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[28]	CHEN J, LIU L T, WANG Z B, et al. Nitrogen fertilization increases root growth and coordinates the root-shoot relationship in cotton[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2020, 11: 880. DOI PMID
[29]	赵文武, 赵鑫, 谢文辉, 等. 干旱胁迫下白刺花幼苗根系生长和生理特性的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(1): 120-129. DOI
	ZHAO W W, ZHAO X, XIE W H, et al. Response of root growth and development and physiological characteristics of Sophora davidii under drought stress[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(1): 120-129. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[30]	撒春宁, 刘金龙, 许冬梅, 等. 不同播种方式下蒙古冰草和沙生冰草根系构型对干旱胁迫的响应[J]. 中国草地学报, 2023, 45(9): 38-46.
	SA C N, LIU J L, XU D M, et al. Responses of root architecture of Agropyron mongolicum and Agropyron desertorum to drought stress under different sowing patterns[J]. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2023, 45(9): 38-46. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[31]	BAI L P, SUI F G, GE T D, et al. Effect of soil drought stress on leaf water status, membrane permeability and enzymatic antioxidant system of maize[J]. Pedosphere, 2006, 16(3): 326-332.
[32]	郭艳阳, 刘佳, 朱亚利, 等. 玉米叶片光合和抗氧化酶活性对干旱胁迫的响应[J]. 植物生理学报, 2018, 54(12): 1839-1846.
	GUO Y Y, LIU J, ZHU Y L, et al. Responses of photosynthetic and antioxidant enzyme activities in maize leaves to drought stress[J]. Plant Physiology Journal, 2018, 54(12): 1839-1846. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[33]	杨云, 周宇, 班秀文, 等. 干旱胁迫对薏苡幼苗形态和生理特征的影响[J/OL]. 分子植物育种. (2023-07-07) [2023-11-09]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/46.1068.S.20230706.1405.006.html.
	YANG Y, ZHOU Y, BAN X W, et al. Effects of morphological and physiological characteristics of Coix lacrymajobi L. seedlings under drought stress[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding. (2023-07-07) [2023-11-09]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/46.1068.S.20230706.1405.006.html. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[34]	李博书, 陈晶, 杨亮, 等. 干旱胁迫对不同生育时期大豆叶片抗氧化酶活性的影响[J]. 大豆科技, 2022(3): 12-17.
	LI B S, CHEN J, YANG L, et al. Effects of drought stress on antioxidant enzymes activities in soybean leaves at different growth stages[J]. Soybean Science & Technology, 2022(3): 12-17. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[35]	张玉屏, 朱德峰, 林贤青, 等. 不同时期水分胁迫对水稻生长特性和产量形成的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2005, 23(2): 48-53.
	ZHANG Y P, ZHU D F, LIN X Q, et al. Effects of water stress on rice growth and yield at different growth stages[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2005, 23(2): 48-53. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[36]	DEMMIG-ADAMS B, STEWART J J, BAKER C R, et al. Optimization of photosynthetic productivity in contrasting environments by regulons controlling plant form and function[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2018, 19(3): 872.
[37]	晁漫宁, 史新月, 张健龙, 等. 灌浆期持续干旱对小麦光合、抗氧化酶活性、籽粒产量和品质的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2020, 40(4): 494-502.
	CHAO M N, SHI X Y, ZHANG J L, et al. Effects of persistent drought at grain filling stage on flag leaf photosynthesis, antioxidant enzyme activity, grain yield and quality of wheat[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2020, 40(4): 494-502. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[38]	尹豪杰, 王荣荣, 蒋桂英, 等. 春小麦光合生理和产量对干旱-复水的响应[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023, 37(6):134-144.
	YIN H J, WANG R R, JIANG G Y, et al. Response of photosynthetic physiology and yield of spring wheat to drought-rewatering[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2023, 37(6):134-144. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[39]	王荣荣, 谢冰莹, 王海琪, 等. 滴灌春小麦根系形态特征及内源激素含量对花期干旱及复水的响应[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2023, 43(9): 1174-1186.
	WANG R R, XIE B Y, WANG H Q, et al. Response of root morphology and endogenous hormones of drip irrigated spring wheat to drought stress and rewatering at anthesis stage[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2023, 43(9): 1174-1186. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[40]	薛小娇, 张永清, 张萌, 等. 新造地施磷深度对水分胁迫下苦荞抗氧化特性和产量的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2021, 50(11): 28-35.
	XUE X J, ZHANG Y Q, ZHANG M, et al. Effect of phosphorus application depth in newly planted field on antioxidant properties and yield of Tartary buckwheat under water stress[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 50(11): 28-35. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI

Effect of different drought-rewatering modes on growth and yield of Tartary buckwheat

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 5

References 40

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	CHEN Yutiao, YAN Chuan, HONG Xiaofu, SONG Jiayu. Effects of submergence at tillering stage on growth characters, yield formation and potassium uptake of japonica inbred rice [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(9): 1990-1999.
[2]	GAO Guoji, LONG Ling, SONG Xiaoyun, LI Yantong, LIU Gaoqiang, DING Gongtao. Effects of Hermetia illucens larvae instead of soybean meal on growth, development and serum biochemical indexes of Pekin ducks [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(8): 1764-1772.
[3]	SHEN Shengfa, XIANG Chao, MENG Yusha, LI Bing, WU Liehong. Breeding, yield and quality characteristics of Zheshu 86, a sweetpotato variety with high photosynthetic efficiency [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(7): 1469-1480.
[4]	PAN Zhijun, WU Xiaowen, WU Chenyang, CHENG Yu, CHEN Long, ZHANG Xiaohong, ZHANG Jinshan, ZHOU Bing, JIANG Bo, ZHANG Wenjing, CHE Zhao, SONG He. Analysis of yield and utilization of temperature and light resources of different types of ratoon rice varieties in central Anhui, China [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(7): 1492-1501.
[5]	LI Hui, TAN Xiaoqin, TANG Qian, YANG Yang, CHEN Wei. Effects of flower thinning on yield and quality components of Zi Yan tea plants [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(7): 1602-1615.
[6]	HU Tiejun. Effects of chemical fertilizer reduction combined with microbial fertilizer application on yield, quality, and soil properties of broccoli [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(7): 1657-1665.
[7]	XU Liting, QI Guangping, KANG Yanxia, YIN Minhua, MA Yanlin, JIA Qiong, WANG Jinghai, JIANG Yuanbo. Meta-analysis of effects of regulated deficit irrigation on yield and quality of alfalfa [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(6): 1256-1269.
[8]	ZHAO Liming, WANG Yaxin, JIANG Wenxin, DUAN Shaobiao, SHEN Xuefeng, ZHENG Dianfeng, FENG Naijie. Effects of plant growth regulators on yield, quality and photosynthetic characteristics of high-quality japonica rice [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(5): 1003-1014.
[9]	GAO Hu, MU Xiaoguo, LI Haijun, GAO Fucheng, ZHANG Ying, LI Jianshe, YE Lin. Effect of Fenlong tillage on soil characteristics and cabbage yield in dam land [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(5): 1113-1123.
[10]	YANG Mingfeng, JI Chunrong, LIU Yong, BAI Shujun, CHEN Xue, LIU Ailin. Effects of continuous drought stress on cotton growth and soil drought threshold at flowering and boll stage [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(4): 738-747.
[11]	XUE Xianbin, JIA Qiong, CHEN Zhengfeng, LI Ruiyuan, CHEN Qingfu, SHI Taoxiong. Comprehensive evaluation of agronomic characteristics of recombinant inbred lines of Tartary buckwheat based on principal component analysis [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(4): 748-759.
[12]	CHEN Junlin, JIANG Na, LIU Xin, ZHUO Hong, TIAN Chang, HAN Yongliang, ZHANG Yuping, RONG Xiangmin. Effects of controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer reduction on crop yield, nitrogen absorption and runoff loss [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(4): 846-858.
[13]	YU Ruixian, HU Xiuqing, LIU Xinju, TANG Tao, WU Min, WU Shenggan, ZHAO Xueping. Effect of sublethal dosage of fenvalerate to growth and development of the silkworm, Bombyx mori [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(2): 264-271.
[14]	TIAN Xiaoming, XIANG Guangfeng, MOU Cun, LYU Hao, MA Tao, ZHU Lu, PENG Jing, ZHANG Min, HE Yan. Drought tolerance evaluation of four species of Ormosia [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(2): 308-324.
[15]	LIU Zhicheng, YAN Liangwen, CHEN Yaoyao, OU Xueting. Yield and quality characteristics of passion fruit under different cultivation modes in Fujian, China [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(1): 134-147.