Influence of four environmental substances on absorption behavior of sulfamonomethoxine in the soil

›› 2013, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (1): 0-134.

• 论文 •

Influence of four environmental substances on absorption behavior of sulfamonomethoxine in the soil

JIN Caixia;PI Yunqing;WU Chunyan;XUE Wanxin;CHEN Qiuying;LIU Junjun

School of Environment, Henan Nomal University， Henan Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Control， Key Laboratory for Yellow River and Huaihe River Water Environmental and Pollution Control Minisitry of Education， Xinxiang 453007， China

Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2013-01-25 Published:2013-01-25

Abstract

Abstract: Sulfamonomethoxine is a veterinary antibiotic drug， which can be absorbed by soil. The adsorption behavior of sulfamonomethoxine in soil and influence of nitrate， urea， anionic surfactant dodecylbenzene sulfonate （SDBS）， cationic surfactant hexadecyltrimethyl\|ammonium bromide （CTMAB） and humic acid （HA） on it were studied. The results showed that: the distribution coefficient Kd of sulfamonomethoxine in the soil was 18.9 mL·g-1， organic carbon distribution constant KOC was 466.2 mL·g-1; furthermore， sulfamonomethoxine possessed the mobility in the soil. 50 mL·g-1 urea and anionic surfactant SDBS can decrease adsorption of sulfamonomethoxine in soil， increasing its mobility in soil. 500 mL·g-1 urea， cationic surfactant CTMAB and HA can increase adsorption of sulfamonomethoxine in soil.

Key words: sulfamonomethoxine, soil, adsorption, environmental substances, distribution coefficient Kd, organic carbon distribution constant KOC

JIN Caixia;PI Yunqing;WU Chunyan;XUE Wanxin;CHEN Qiuying;LIU Junjun. Influence of four environmental substances on absorption behavior of sulfamonomethoxine in the soil[J]. , 2013, 25(1): 0-134.

[1]	FAN Linjuan, LIU Zirong, XU Xueliang, WANG Fenshan, PENG Deliang, YAO Yingjuan. Effects of six kinds of nematicides on soil microbial population, enzymes activities and nutrients in replanted Chinese yam field [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(3): 506-515.
[2]	CHENG Jing, LIU Jiming, WANG Shu, WANG Deng, LI Lixia, XU Guorui, CHEN Meng, HUANG Luting. Plasticity of a karst endemic plant Juglans regia L. f. luodianense Liu et Xu in response to soil moisture [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(2): 259-269.
[3]	FAN Linjuan, LIU Zirong, XU Xueliang, WANG Fenshan, PENG Deliang, YAO Yingjuan. Effects of different planting patterns on soil nematode community structure and soil properties of Chinese yam field [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(2): 316-325.
[4]	YANG Yiwei, XIAO Hua, CHEN Hu, XIAO Niejia, GUO Cheng. Structural characteristics of soil mite communities under different modes of rose-based agroforestry in Karst area [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(1): 112-121.
[5]	CHEN Gui, LU Chenni, SHI Yanping, NI Xiongwei, CHENG Wangda, ZHANG Hongmei, WANG Baojun, ZHANG Liping, SUN Da. Effect of different controlled-release fertilizers with urea ammonium on yield, nitrogen use efficiency and soil nutrients of rice [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(1): 122-130.
[6]	LI Jinwu, YU Jihua, LYU Jian, FENG Zhi, YANG Haixing, CHE Xusheng, QIN Qijie, ZHANG Yang, JIN Ning. Effects of different mulching methods on yield, quality and soil nutrients of open-air loose-curd cauliflower on plateau in summer [J]. , 2020, 32(9): 1626-1633.
[7]	CHANG Huiqing, XU Fujin, PAN Yajie. Passivation effects of calcium carbonate with/without chitosan on chromium pollution in calcareous soil [J]. , 2020, 32(9): 1665-1671.
[8]	ZHANG Tongshuai, YAN Lijuan, LI Guang, CHEN Guopeng, LUO Yongzhong. Effects of no tillage and straw mulching on soil nitrogen, water content and yield of spring wheat in dryland farming area [J]. , 2020, 32(8): 1329-1341.
[9]	LU Muyuan, LIU Yuan, LIU Guijian. Predictive analysis of soil organic matter content in black soil region based on combined model [J]. , 2020, 32(8): 1427-1436.
[10]	QIAN Jiawei, LIU Xiaoqing, ZHANG Jingjing, ZHOU Weihong, LI Jianlong. Constructions of hyperspectral remote sensing monitoring models for heavy metal contents in farmland soil in Zhangjiagang City [J]. , 2020, 32(8): 1437-1445.
[11]	ZHANG Liang, LI Yuting, XU Xiaofeng. Dissolution and release of soil potassium by ectomycorrhizal fungi under Mn²⁺ stress [J]. , 2020, 32(7): 1215-1222.
[12]	CHEN Mingru, HU Junguo, CUI Wufeng, YU Ping. Study on calculation method of soil carbon flux based on Maxwell-Stefan diffusion model [J]. , 2020, 32(6): 1029-1038.
[13]	NIU Suzhen, AN Hongwei, SONG Qinfei, CHEN Zhengwu. Analysis and evaluation of soil nutrients of wild tea germplasm in Guizhou [J]. , 2020, 32(6): 1039-1048.
[14]	LIU Chunlin, ZHANG Jian, PENG Yishu, NI Xinran, YANG Ruidong. Contents and health risks assessment of heavy metals in soil and tea in Leishan, Guizhou Province [J]. , 2020, 32(6): 1049-1059.
[15]	LIN Hui, ZHANG Jin, YUAN Qianyu, YE Jing, SUN Wanchun, YU Yijun, YU Qiaogang, MA Junwei. Improving microbial system of continuous cropping soil by addition of Trichoderma asperellum and ultrafine powder humus [J]. , 2020, 32(6): 1060-1069.

Influence of four environmental substances on absorption behavior of sulfamonomethoxine in the soil

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments