浙江农业学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (1): 33-40.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2022.01.05
张昕1(), 张铭1, 何宏轩2,*(
), 胡延春1,*(
)
收稿日期:
2020-09-14
出版日期:
2022-01-25
发布日期:
2022-02-05
通讯作者:
何宏轩,胡延春
作者简介:
何宏轩,E-mail: hehx@ioz.ac.cn基金资助:
ZHANG Xin1(), ZHANG Ming1, HE Hongxuan2,*(
), HU Yanchun1,*(
)
Received:
2020-09-14
Online:
2022-01-25
Published:
2022-02-05
Contact:
HE Hongxuan,HU Yanchun
摘要:
为探讨隐绿原酸(4-CQA)对感染H9N2亚型禽流感(H9N2-AIV)病毒的小鼠造成肺损伤的修复作用,将90只6~8周龄健康昆明系小鼠随机分为病毒(H9N2)感染组、H9N2+4-CQA组、空白对照组、4-CQA对照组,用H9N2-AIV滴鼻复制小鼠肺损伤模型并灌胃4-CQA干预。观察各组小鼠肺组织病理学变化;测定肺指数及肺内丙二醛(MDA)、总超氧化物歧化酶(T-SOD)、髓过氧化物酶(MPO)含量;测定脾内T淋巴细胞亚群CD4+、CD8+百分比及比率(CD4+/CD8+)。结果显示,H9N2组小鼠表现出精神沉郁、呼吸急促;肺指数上升、脾指数下降;肺组织病理学表现为肺泡萎缩、肺泡隔增厚、局部肺实变;T淋巴细胞亚群CD4+/CD8+比率显著下降(P<0.05);肺内T-SOD活性显著下降、MDA含量显著增加、MPO活性显著升高(P<0.05)。4-CQA干预后,小鼠肺指数下降、脾指数上升;肺组织病理学损伤减轻;T淋巴细胞亚群CD4+/CD8+比率显著上升(P<0.05);肺内T-SOD活性显著升高,MDA含量显著降低,MPO活性显著下降(P<0.05)。得出4-CQA可通过维持机体免疫平衡、降低机体氧化损伤来缓解由H9N2亚型AIV诱导的小鼠肺损伤。
中图分类号:
张昕, 张铭, 何宏轩, 胡延春. 隐绿原酸对H9N2-AIV致小鼠肺损伤的免疫调节和抗氧化效果[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(1): 33-40.
ZHANG Xin, ZHANG Ming, HE Hongxuan, HU Yanchun. Effect of cryptochlorogenic acid on immunomodulatory and antioxidant in mice of lung injury induced by H9N2-AIV[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(1): 33-40.
组别 Group | 第3天 3rd day | 第5天 5th day | 第7天7th day | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
肺指数 Lung index | 脾指数 Spleen index | 肺指数 Lung index | 脾指数 Spleen index | 肺指数 Lung index | 脾指数 Spleen index | |
H9N2 | 0.80±0.04 a | 0.30±0.02 a | 0.89±0.02 a | 0.33±0.01 c | 1.03±0.01 a | 0.38±0.01 b |
H9N2+4-CQA | 0.76±0.05 a | 0.32±0.03 a | 0.79±0.03 b | 0.36±0.01 b | 0.80±0.02 b | 0.44±0.04 ab |
对照组Control | 0.66±0.03 b | 0.35±0.04 a | 0.65±0.05 c | 0.41±0.01 a | 0.66±0.05 c | 0.47±0.03 a |
4-CQA | 0.68±0.02 b | 0.35±0.04 a | 0.68±0.04 c | 0.41±0.01 a | 0.64±0.03 c | 0.47±0.03 a |
表1 小鼠脏器指数
Table 1 The organ index of mice
组别 Group | 第3天 3rd day | 第5天 5th day | 第7天7th day | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
肺指数 Lung index | 脾指数 Spleen index | 肺指数 Lung index | 脾指数 Spleen index | 肺指数 Lung index | 脾指数 Spleen index | |
H9N2 | 0.80±0.04 a | 0.30±0.02 a | 0.89±0.02 a | 0.33±0.01 c | 1.03±0.01 a | 0.38±0.01 b |
H9N2+4-CQA | 0.76±0.05 a | 0.32±0.03 a | 0.79±0.03 b | 0.36±0.01 b | 0.80±0.02 b | 0.44±0.04 ab |
对照组Control | 0.66±0.03 b | 0.35±0.04 a | 0.65±0.05 c | 0.41±0.01 a | 0.66±0.05 c | 0.47±0.03 a |
4-CQA | 0.68±0.02 b | 0.35±0.04 a | 0.68±0.04 c | 0.41±0.01 a | 0.64±0.03 c | 0.47±0.03 a |
组别Group | CD4+/% | CD8+/% | CD4+/CD8+ |
---|---|---|---|
H9N2 | 17.61±3.92 a | 10.37±2.61 a | 1.71±0.06 b |
H9N2+4-CQA | 19.20±3.73 a | 8.75±2.03 a | 2.21±0.08 a |
对照组Control | 19.74±4.77 a | 9.52±2.16 a | 2.07±0.03 a |
4-CQA | 16.34±3.54 a | 7.51±1.51 a | 2.20±0.15 a |
表2 第7天各组小鼠脾T淋巴细胞亚群百分比及比值
Table 2 The percentage and ratio of T cell subgroups of mice on the 7th day
组别Group | CD4+/% | CD8+/% | CD4+/CD8+ |
---|---|---|---|
H9N2 | 17.61±3.92 a | 10.37±2.61 a | 1.71±0.06 b |
H9N2+4-CQA | 19.20±3.73 a | 8.75±2.03 a | 2.21±0.08 a |
对照组Control | 19.74±4.77 a | 9.52±2.16 a | 2.07±0.03 a |
4-CQA | 16.34±3.54 a | 7.51±1.51 a | 2.20±0.15 a |
图2 小鼠肺T-SOD活性变化 *,与空白对照组比较差异显著(P<0.05);#,与攻毒组比较差异显著(P<0.05)。下同。
Fig.2 Activity of T-SOD in lung of mice * showed the significant difference compared with that of control (P<0.05);# showed the significant difference compared with that of H9N2 group (P<0.05). The same as below.
[1] | 陈伯伦, 张泽纪, 陈伟斌. 鸡A型禽流感病毒的分离与血清学初步鉴定[J]. 中国家禽, 1997, 19(11): 5-7. |
CHEN B L, ZHANG Z J, CHEN W B. Isolation and preliminary serological identification of avian influenza virus-type A from chickens[J]. China Poultry, 1997, 19(11): 5-7.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[2] | 玄扬. H9N2亚型禽流感病毒致小鼠肺损伤的研究[D]. 青岛:青岛农业大学, 2015. |
XUAN Y. Study on lung injury induced by H9N2 subtype avian influenza virus in mice[D]. Qingdao: Qingdao Agricultural University, 2015.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[3] | 郭元吉, 李建国, 程小雯, 等. 禽H9N2亚型流感病毒能感染人的发现[J]. 中华实验和临床病毒学杂志, 1999, 13(2): 105. |
GUO Y J, LI J G, CHENG X W, et al. Discovery of men infected by avian influenza A(H9N2) virus[J]. Chinese Journal of Experimental and Clinical Virology, 1999, 13(2): 105.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[4] | 郭元吉, 温乐英, 张烨, 等. 猪在禽H9N2亚型流感病毒感染人中的作用[J]. 中华实验和临床病毒学杂志, 2005, 19(2): 106-109. |
GUO Y J, WEN L Y, ZHANG Y, et al. Do pigs play a role in human infection with avian influenza A H9N2 viruses[J]. Chinese Journal of Experimental and Clinical Virology, 2005, 19(2): 106-109.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[5] | 潘志明, 钱忠明, 焦新安, 等. 禽流感病毒流行病学研究概述[J]. 家禽科学, 2006(9): 38-42. |
PAN Z M, QIAN Z M, JIAO X A, et al. Overview of avian influenza virus epidemiology[J]. Poultry Science, 2006(9): 38-42.(in Chinese) | |
[6] | 万晓朋. 中国大陆H9N2亚型禽流感病毒遗传演化分析及疫苗株的选择[D]. 哈尔滨:中国农业科学院哈尔滨兽医研究所, 2010. |
WAN X P. Evolution of H9N2 influenza viruses in mainland China and selection of vaccine candidate[D]. Harbin: Harbin Veterinary Research Institute, CAAS, 2010.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[7] |
DONG J L, LI Y, XIAO H W, et al. Cordycepin sensitizes breast cancer cells toward irradiation through elevating ROS production involving Nrf2[J]. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 2019, 364: 12-21.
DOI URL |
[8] |
MACHADO M, FELIZARDO C, FERNANDES-SILVA A A, et al. Polyphenolic compounds, antioxidant activity and l-phenylalanine ammonia-lyase activity during ripening of olive cv. “Cobrançosa” under different irrigation regimes[J]. Food Research International, 2013, 51(1): 412-421.
DOI URL |
[9] | 杨斌, 丘岳, 王柳萍, 等. 广西山银花绿原酸体外抗炎作用及分子机制研究[J]. 中国药理学通报, 2009, 25(4): 542-545. |
YANG B, QIU Y, WANG L P, et al. Studies on the anti-inflammatory molecular mechanism of chlorogenic acid extracted from Lonicera confusa DC in vitro[J]. Chinese Pharmacological Bulletin, 2009, 25(4): 542-545.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[10] | 刘英, 王之盛, 周安国, 等. 橙皮苷和绿原酸的体内外抗氧化效应研究[J]. 食品科学, 2009, 30(23): 196-199. |
LIU Y, WANG Z S, ZHOU A G, et al. In vivo and in vitro antioxidant effects of hesperidin and chlorogenic acid[J]. Food Science, 2009, 30(23): 196-199.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[11] | 赵金娟, 戴雪梅, 曲永胜, 等. 绿原酸药效学研究进展[J]. 中国野生植物资源, 2013, 32(4): 1-5. |
ZHAO J J, DAI X M, QU Y S, et al. Progress in the pharmacodynamics of chlorogenic acid[J]. Chinese Wild Plant Resources, 2013, 32(4): 1-5.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[12] | 李捷. 绿原酸抗病毒研究进展[J]. 畜牧兽医科技信息, 2013(4): 6-7. |
LI J. Research progress of chlorogenic acid antiviral[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2013(4): 6-7.(in Chinese) | |
[13] | 杨晓丽, 张君利, 王京峰, 等. 绿原酸抗肿瘤作用及机制研究进展[J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志, 2018, 24(19): 229-234. |
YANG X L, ZHANG J L, WANG J F, et al. Research progress in anti-tumor and mechanism of chlorogenic acid[J]. Chinese Journal of Experimental Traditional Medical Formulae, 2018, 24(19): 229-234.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[14] | 吴卫华, 康桢, 欧阳冬生, 等. 绿原酸的药理学研究进展[J]. 天然产物研究与开发, 2006, 18(4): 691-694. |
WU W H, KANG Z, OUYANG D S, et al. Progresses in the pharmacology of chlorogenic acid[J]. Natural Product Research and Development, 2006, 18(4): 691-694.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[15] | 李洪辛, 姜洪彬, 刘姝男, 等. 绿原酸对小鼠变应性鼻炎的作用及其机制研究[J]. 中国生化药物杂志, 2015, 35(6): 1-5. |
LI H X, JIANG H B, LIU S N, et al. Effect and mechanism of chlorogenic acid in allergic rhinitis mice[J]. Chinese Journal of Biochemical Pharmaceutics, 2015, 35(6): 1-5.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[16] | 宋卓, 黄康, 黄林, 等. 高剂量绿原酸对脂多糖诱导肝脏炎症因子mRNA表达的影响[J]. 营养学报, 2014, 36(5): 481-485. |
SONG Z, HUANG K, HUANG L, et al. Effect of chlorogenic acid at high dose on expression of hepatic inflammatory cytokines mRNA induced by lipopolysaccharides[J]. Acta Nutrimenta Sinica, 2014, 36(5): 481-485.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[17] | CHEN J X, XUE H J, YE W C, et al. Activity of andrographolide and its derivatives against influenza virus in vivo and in vitro[J]. Biological & Pharmaceutical Bulletin, 2009, 32(8): 1385-1391. |
[18] | 陈建新, 邱灵才, 方炳虎, 等. 甘草酸单铵盐对H9N2禽流感病毒的作用机制研究[J]. 中草药, 2008, 39(6): 896-899. |
CHEN J X, QIU L C, FANG B H, et al. Study on the mechanism of glycyrrhizic acid monoammonium salt on H9N2 avian influenza virus[J]. Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs, 2008, 39(6): 896-899.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[19] | 张露. 南方特色蔬菜(藜蒿和甘薯叶)中多酚的提取及抗氧化成分分离鉴定[D]. 南昌:南昌大学, 2015. |
ZHANG L. Extraction of polyphenols, and isolation and identification of antioxidant constituents from special South China vegetables(Artemisia selengensis Turcz and Ipomoea batatas L.) leaves[D]. Nanchang: Nanchang University, 2015.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[20] |
KUMAR N, GOEL N. Phenolic acids: Natural versatile molecules with promising therapeutic applications[J]. Biotechnology Reports, 2019, 24: e00370.
DOI URL |
[21] | 刘伯言. 入侵植物紫茎泽兰的资源化利用研究[D]. 北京:中国科学院大学(中国科学院过程工程研究所), 2017. |
LIU B Y. Resourceful utilization of invasive plant Eupatorium adenophorum[D]. Beijing: Institute of Process Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2017.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[22] | 吕进, 王希良. 流感病毒感染介导的免疫病理损伤研究进展[J]. 生物化学与生物物理进展, 2009, 36(8): 961-967. |
LYU J, WANG X L. Immunopathology mediated by influenza virus infection[J]. Progress in Biochemistry and Biophysics, 2009, 36(8): 961-967.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[23] | 关洪全, 罗晶. 免疫学基础与病原生物学[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2012. |
[24] | SYRJÄLÄ H, SURCEL H M, ILONEN J. Low CD4/CD8 T lymphocyte ratio in acute myocardial infarction[J]. Clinical & Experimental Immunology, 1991, 83(2): 326-328. |
[25] | AKAIKE T, NOGUCHI Y, IJIRI S, et al. Pathogenesis of influenza virus-induced pneumonia: involvement of both nitric oxide and oxygen radicals[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1996, 93(6): 2448-2453. |
[26] | 王国华, 王存连, 田树飞, 等. 肌肽对H9N2亚型猪流感病毒诱导的小鼠急性肺损伤的抗氧化效果[J]. 中国病理生理杂志, 2013, 29(12): 2235-2239. |
WANG G H, WANG C L, TIAN S F, et al. Antioxidant effect of carnosine on H9N2 swine influenza virus-induced acute lung injury in mice[J]. Chinese Journal of Pathophysiology, 2013, 29(12): 2235-2239.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[27] | 刘宝剑, 王存连, 徐明举, 等. 人参皂苷Rb1对H9N2亚型猪流感病毒诱导急性肺损伤小鼠肺组织氧自由基的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2013, 44(9): 1468-1474. |
LIU B J, WANG C L, XU M J, et al. Effect of ginsenoside Rb1 on oxygen free radicals in acute lung injury of mice induced by H9N2 swine influenza virus[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 2013, 44(9): 1468-1474.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[28] |
LIMA TRAJANO E T, STERNBERG C, CAETANO M, et al. Endotoxin-induced acute lung injury is dependent upon oxidative response[J]. Inhalation Toxicology, 2011, 23(14): 918-926.
DOI URL |
[29] | 徐明举, 利凯, 崔红玉, 等. H3N2猪流感病毒诱导的小鼠急性肺损伤与SOD、NO、MDA和OH·变化的相关性[J]. 中国病理生理杂志, 2011, 27(4): 783-786. |
XU M J, LI K, CUI H Y, et al. Effect of H3N2 swine influenza virus-induced acute lung injury on changes of OH·, NO, MDA and SOD in mice[J]. Chinese Journal of Pathophysiology, 2011, 27(4): 783-786.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[30] | 管国芳, 孙立群. 喉癌及癌旁组织中脂质过氧化物及超氧化物歧化酶的研究[J]. 中国耳鼻咽喉颅底外科杂志, 1996, 2(3): 144. |
GUAN G F, SUN L Q. Study of lipidperoxides and superoxide dismutase in the tissue of laryngeal carcinoma and tumor adjacent tissue[J]. Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology-Skull Base Surgery, 1996, 2(3): 144.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[31] | HIPKISS A R, WORTHINGTON V C, HIMSWORTH D T J, et al. Protective effects of carnosine against protein modification mediated by malondialdehyde and hypochlorite[J]. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-General Subjects, 1998, 1380(1): 46-54. |
[32] | 李建强, 高晓玲, 刘卓拉, 等. 胆红素对抗脂多糖诱导致大鼠急性肺损伤的实验研究[J]. 中国病理生理杂志, 2005, 21(4): 780-783. |
LI J Q, GAO X L, LIU Z L, et al. Antagonistic effect of bilirulin on acute lung injury induced by LPS in rats[J]. Chinese Journal of Pathophysiology, 2005, 21(4): 780-783.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[33] | 刘星. OSAHS、氧化应激及MPO三者关系研究新进展[J]. 医学临床研究, 2013, 30(3): 575-577. |
LIU X. Research progress on the relationship between OSAHS, oxidative stress and MPO[J]. Journal of Clinical Research, 2013, 30(3): 575-577.(in Chinese) |
[1] | 郑钢, 顾翠花, 王杰, 林琳. 干旱胁迫对黄薇光合特性和若干生理生化指标的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(9): 1650-1659. |
[2] | 李雪, 张玉, 王君虹, 朱作艺, 孙素玲, 刘志, 朱申龙, 沈国新, Agusti ROMERO, 王伟. 初榨橄榄油中多酚化合物的UPLC-FLD检测及其抗氧化活性研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(5): 907-915. |
[3] | 陶新, 吴宛澐, 孙雨晴, 门小明, 徐子伟. 正交设计优化中药类植物提取物组方[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(12): 2295-2303. |
[4] | 唐晓姝, 胡博, 陈雪梅, 张白曦. 黑果腺肋花楸榨汁工艺研究与果汁品质评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(12): 2406-2414. |
[5] | 赵华, 任晴雯, 王熙予, 李珍妮, 唐秀梅, 蒋丽慧, 刘鹏, 邢承华. 丛枝菌根真菌对盐胁迫下番茄抗氧化酶活性和光合特性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(11): 2075-2084. |
[6] | 王贤, 刘放, 魏小红, 朱晓林, 王宝强. 不同种质番茄材料抗番茄黄化曲叶病毒病特性研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(11): 2085-2097. |
[7] | 李启思, 王雅玲, 邓玉华, 廖建萌, 叶林, 吴莉莉, 郑佳纯, 罗杏燕, 邓旗, 孙力军. 五味子木脂素超声提取工艺优化及其抗氧化和抗真菌的潜力[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(11): 2145-2154. |
[8] | 练华山, 李欣欣, 林立金, 廖明安. 表油菜素内酯对夏黑葡萄幼苗生长的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(10): 1889-1896. |
[9] | 石婧, 刘东洋, 张凤华. 棉花幼苗对盐胁迫的生理响应与耐盐机理[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(7): 1141-1148. |
[10] | 李园成, 孙宏, 吴逸飞, 姚晓红, 沈琦, 汤江武. 固态发酵棉籽仁的营养成分及其抗氧化活性[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(4): 610-615. |
[11] | 温慧萍, 雷伟敏, 柯乐芹, 陈雨薇, 侯景, 肖建中. 灵芝孢子粉总三萜的提取优化及其体外生物活性[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(4): 705-713. |
[12] | 刘新宇, 陈鹏, 张光辉, 赵俊杰, 李博浩, 张南, 孙韦珂, 许娟娟, 叶行涛, 魏金鹏, 于高波. 外源脯氨酸对番茄体内残留百菌清降解的调控作用[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(3): 437-446. |
[13] | 边建文, 崔岩, 杨宋琪, 罗光宏, 孟宪刚. 衣藻和固氮鱼腥藻对盐胁迫下小麦幼苗生长的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(10): 1748-1756. |
[14] | 李磊, 赵花金, 伍子焘, 李升和, 姜锦鹏, 刘畅. 决明子抗氧化作用机制的网络药理学分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(10): 1855-1865. |
[15] | 杨志, 李文义, 高云涛, 熊华斌, 陈毅坚, 杨慧娟. 响应面法优化针叶樱桃总黄酮的提取工艺及其抗氧化活性研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(10): 1866-1872. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||