浙江农业学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (2): 308-315.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2021.02.14
张辉(), 车旭升, 吕剑, 缑兆辉, 秦启杰, 罗建, 张国斌*(
)
收稿日期:
2020-06-08
出版日期:
2021-02-25
发布日期:
2021-02-25
通讯作者:
张国斌
作者简介:
张国斌,E-mail: zhanggb@gsau.edu.cn基金资助:
ZHANG Hui(), CHE Xusheng, LYU Jian, GOU Zhaohui, QIN Qijie, LUO Jian, ZHANG Guobin*(
)
Received:
2020-06-08
Online:
2021-02-25
Published:
2021-02-25
Contact:
ZHANG Guobin
摘要:
以西兰花品种碧绿为试材,采用双因素交互试验设计,设置3个灌水量水平——W1(田间最大持水量的80%)、W2(田间最大持水量的60%)、W3(田间最大持水量的40%)和3种氮素形态——N1(全硝态氮)、N2(硝态氮与铵态氮的比例为7∶3)、N3(硝态氮与铵态氮的比例为5∶5),研究不同灌水量与氮素形态对西兰花干物质积累(干重)、产量、水氮利用效率和氮代谢的影响。结果表明:总的来看,在相同氮素形态下,西兰花干重、产量、氮肥偏生产力随着灌水量的减少呈现先升高后降低的趋势;在相同的灌水量下,西兰花的谷氨酰胺合成酶、谷氨酸合成酶活性和叶片可溶性蛋白含量随着铵态氮比例的增加而升高,而硝酸还原酶活性的变化与此正好相反。综合来看,本试验条件下,当灌水量为田间最大持水量的60%、硝态氮与铵态氮的比例为5∶5时,西兰花的产量、水氮利用效率、干重等性状均表现较优,是适宜当地西兰花生产的水氮组合。
中图分类号:
张辉, 车旭升, 吕剑, 缑兆辉, 秦启杰, 罗建, 张国斌. 灌水量与氮素形态对西兰花生产和氮代谢的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(2): 308-315.
ZHANG Hui, CHE Xusheng, LYU Jian, GOU Zhaohui, QIN Qijie, LUO Jian, ZHANG Guobin. Effects of irrigation amount and nitrogen forms on production and nitrogen metabolism of broccoli[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(2): 308-315.
氮素形态 Nitrogen form | 灌水量 Irrigation amount | 莲座期 Rosette stage | 结球期 Heading stage | 采收期 Harvest stage | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
地上部Shoot | 地下部Root | 地上部Shoot | 地下部Root | 地上部Shoot | 地下部Root | ||
N1 | W1 | 28.25±0.65 e | 2.54±0.03 de | 59.36±0.45 c | 5.98±0.38 c | 157.89±5.01 b | 8.70±1.26 bc |
W2 | 33.33±0.67 cd | 2.59±0.02 cde | 62.88±1.53 bc | 6.63±0.36 bc | 178.92±4.84 a | 12.07±0.51 a | |
W3 | 32.31±1.09 cd | 2.34±0.04 e | 60.92±5.24 c | 6.33±0.05 bc | 154.23±4.70 bc | 11.33±0.40 a | |
N2 | W1 | 30.62±1.03 de | 2.72±0.06 bcd | 61.96±1.28 bc | 6.34±0.42 bc | 132.21±5.62 d | 8.16±0.73 c |
W2 | 33.57±1.45 cd | 2.82±0.20 bc | 67.08±1.45 abc | 7.22±0.28 ab | 140.72±10.39 bcd | 10.76±0.72 ab | |
W3 | 32.91±1.05 cd | 2.56±0.07 de | 69.99±3.79 ab | 6.53±0.25 bc | 136.27±3.41 cd | 10.61±0.73 abc | |
N3 | W1 | 37.83±0.94 b | 2.85±0.03 b | 64.15±1.76 bc | 6.35±0.15 bc | 145.98±3.19 bcd | 8.01±0.75 c |
W2 | 46.25±0.46 a | 3.22±0.05 a | 72.83±1.89 a | 7.59±0.26 a | 186.22±6.68 a | 10.34±0.41 abc | |
W3 | 34.34±0.75 c | 2.74±0.03 bcd | 65.90±2.36 abc | 6.90±0.24 abc | 144.90±4.36 bcd | 10.28±1.10 abc |
表1 不同处理对西兰花不同时期地上部和地下部干重的影响
Table 1 Effect of different treatments on dry weight of broccoli at different growth stages g
氮素形态 Nitrogen form | 灌水量 Irrigation amount | 莲座期 Rosette stage | 结球期 Heading stage | 采收期 Harvest stage | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
地上部Shoot | 地下部Root | 地上部Shoot | 地下部Root | 地上部Shoot | 地下部Root | ||
N1 | W1 | 28.25±0.65 e | 2.54±0.03 de | 59.36±0.45 c | 5.98±0.38 c | 157.89±5.01 b | 8.70±1.26 bc |
W2 | 33.33±0.67 cd | 2.59±0.02 cde | 62.88±1.53 bc | 6.63±0.36 bc | 178.92±4.84 a | 12.07±0.51 a | |
W3 | 32.31±1.09 cd | 2.34±0.04 e | 60.92±5.24 c | 6.33±0.05 bc | 154.23±4.70 bc | 11.33±0.40 a | |
N2 | W1 | 30.62±1.03 de | 2.72±0.06 bcd | 61.96±1.28 bc | 6.34±0.42 bc | 132.21±5.62 d | 8.16±0.73 c |
W2 | 33.57±1.45 cd | 2.82±0.20 bc | 67.08±1.45 abc | 7.22±0.28 ab | 140.72±10.39 bcd | 10.76±0.72 ab | |
W3 | 32.91±1.05 cd | 2.56±0.07 de | 69.99±3.79 ab | 6.53±0.25 bc | 136.27±3.41 cd | 10.61±0.73 abc | |
N3 | W1 | 37.83±0.94 b | 2.85±0.03 b | 64.15±1.76 bc | 6.35±0.15 bc | 145.98±3.19 bcd | 8.01±0.75 c |
W2 | 46.25±0.46 a | 3.22±0.05 a | 72.83±1.89 a | 7.59±0.26 a | 186.22±6.68 a | 10.34±0.41 abc | |
W3 | 34.34±0.75 c | 2.74±0.03 bcd | 65.90±2.36 abc | 6.90±0.24 abc | 144.90±4.36 bcd | 10.28±1.10 abc |
氮素形态 Nitrogen form | 灌水量 Irrigation amount | 单个花球质量 Single flower ball weight/kg | 经济产量 Economic yield/ (t·hm-2) | WUE/(kg·m-3) | PFP/(kg·kg-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
N1 | W1 | 0.88±0.02 c | 22.05±0.52 c | 7.00±0.55 c | 98.00±0.20 c |
W2 | 0.98±0.03 ab | 24.55±0.67 ab | 9.89±0.34 ab | 109.11±0.17 ab | |
W3 | 0.78±0.08 d | 18.97±0.44 d | 9.80±0.22 ab | 84.31±0.11 d | |
N2 | W1 | 0.92±0.02 bc | 23.61±0.59 bc | 7.50±0.33 c | 104.93±0.15 bc |
W2 | 0.96±0.03 ab | 24.04±0.32 ab | 9.68±0.23 ab | 106.84±0.10 ab | |
W3 | 0.76±0.02 d | 18.46±0.57 d | 9.53±0.24 b | 82.04±0.06 d | |
N3 | W1 | 0.93±0.03 bc | 23.67±0.84 bc | 7.52±0.32 c | 105.20±0.16 bc |
W2 | 1.02±0.02 a | 25.43±0.44 a | 10.24±0.27 a | 113.02±0.17 a | |
W3 | 0.78±0.02 d | 19.27±0.44 d | 9.95±0.61 ab | 85.64±0.09 d |
表2 不同处理对西兰花产量、水分利用效率(WUE)和氮肥偏生产力(PFP)的影响
Table 2 Effects of different treatments on yield, water use efficiency (WUE) and partial factor productivity from applied nitrogen (PFP) of broccoli
氮素形态 Nitrogen form | 灌水量 Irrigation amount | 单个花球质量 Single flower ball weight/kg | 经济产量 Economic yield/ (t·hm-2) | WUE/(kg·m-3) | PFP/(kg·kg-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
N1 | W1 | 0.88±0.02 c | 22.05±0.52 c | 7.00±0.55 c | 98.00±0.20 c |
W2 | 0.98±0.03 ab | 24.55±0.67 ab | 9.89±0.34 ab | 109.11±0.17 ab | |
W3 | 0.78±0.08 d | 18.97±0.44 d | 9.80±0.22 ab | 84.31±0.11 d | |
N2 | W1 | 0.92±0.02 bc | 23.61±0.59 bc | 7.50±0.33 c | 104.93±0.15 bc |
W2 | 0.96±0.03 ab | 24.04±0.32 ab | 9.68±0.23 ab | 106.84±0.10 ab | |
W3 | 0.76±0.02 d | 18.46±0.57 d | 9.53±0.24 b | 82.04±0.06 d | |
N3 | W1 | 0.93±0.03 bc | 23.67±0.84 bc | 7.52±0.32 c | 105.20±0.16 bc |
W2 | 1.02±0.02 a | 25.43±0.44 a | 10.24±0.27 a | 113.02±0.17 a | |
W3 | 0.78±0.02 d | 19.27±0.44 d | 9.95±0.61 ab | 85.64±0.09 d |
图1 不同处理对西兰花叶片NR活性的影响 同一生长时期柱上无相同字母的表示处理间差异显著(P<0.05)。下同。
Fig.1 Effects of different treatments on nitrate reductase activity of broccoli leaves Bars marked without the same letters indicated significant difference at P<0.05 under different treatments at the same growth stage.The same as below.
[1] | 程春梅, 郭衍银. 采前草酸处理对西兰花贮藏品质的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2020,34(6):1213-1220. |
CHENG C M, GUO Y Y. Effects of preharvest application of oxalic acid on storage quality of broccoli[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2020,34(6):1213-1220.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[2] | 曹翠玲, 李生秀. 氮素形态对作物生理特性及生长的影响[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2004,23(5):581-586. |
CAO C L, LI S X. Effect of N form on crop physiological characteristics and growth[J]. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University, 2004,23(5):581-586.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[3] | 杨旭, 邹志荣, 贺忠群, 等. 蔬菜无土栽培营养液中的氮素及其调控[J]. 西北植物学报, 2003,23(9):1644-1649. |
YANG X, ZOU Z R, HE Z Q, et al. The solution nitrogen of vegetable in nutrient solution and its regulation[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2003,23(9):1644-1649.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[4] | 杨慧, 曹红霞, 刘世和, 等. 水氮耦合对温室番茄光合特性与产量的影响[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2014,33(4/5):58-62. |
YANG H, CAO H X, LIU S H, et al. Effects of water and nitrogen coupling on photosynthetic characteristics and yield of greenhouse tomato[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2014,33(4/5):58-62.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[5] | 张殿忠, 汪沛洪. 水分胁迫与植物氮代谢的关系:水分胁迫时氮素对小麦叶片氮代谢的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 1988,16(4):15-21. |
ZHANG D Z, WANG P H. Relationship between water stress and plant nitrogen metabolism: effects of fertilizer nitrogen on nitrogen metabolism in water stressed wheat leaves[J]. Journal of Northwest Sci-Tech University of Agriculture and Forestry, 1988,16(4):15-21.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[6] | 邢瑶, 马兴华. 氮素形态对植物生长影响的研究进展[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2015,17(2):109-117. |
XING Y, MA X H. Research progress on effect of nitrogen form on plant growth[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2015,17(2):109-117.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[7] | 戴廷波, 曹卫星, 孙传范, 等. 增铵营养对小麦光合作用及硝酸还原酶和谷氨酰胺合成酶的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2003,14(9):1529-1532. |
DAI T B, CAO W X, SUN C F, et al. Effect of enhanced ammonium nutrition on photosynjournal and nitrate reductase and glutamine synthetase activities of winter wheat[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2003,14(9):1529-1532.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[8] | 翁伯琦, 郑向丽, 赵婷, 等. 不同生育期花生叶片蛋白质含量及氮代谢相关酶活性分析[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2014,23(1):65-70. |
WENG B Q, ZHENG X L, ZHAO T, et al. Analyses on protein content and enzyme activity involved in nitrogen metabolism of peanut (Arachis hypogaea) leaf at different growth stages[J]. Journal of Plant Resources and Environment, 2014,23(1):65-70.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[9] |
LEA P J, MIFLIN B J. Alternative route for nitrogen assimilation in higher plants[J]. Nature, 1974,251(5476):614-616.
DOI URL PMID |
LIU T, ZHU S, FU L, et al. Morphological and physiological changes of ramie (Boehmeria nivea L. Gaud) in response to drought stress and GA3 treatment[J]. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology, 2013,60(6):749-755.
PMID |
|
[11] | 高俊凤. 植物生理学实验指导[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社, 2006. |
[12] |
KIRK G J D, KRONZUCKER H J. The potential for nitrification and nitrate uptake in the rhizosphere of wetland plants: a modelling study[J]. Annals of Botany, 2005,96(4):639-646.
DOI URL PMID |
[13] | 郭文忠, 曲梅, 韦彦, 等. 灌溉频率对日光温室黄瓜生长发育及干物质积累的响应[J]. 中国农学通报, 2007,23(5):467-470. |
GUO W Z, QU M, WEI Y, et al. The primary study on response of growth, yield and dry matter of cucumber under different irrigation frequency in solar greenhouse[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2007,23(5):467-470.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[14] | 曹超群, 张国斌, 胡琳莉, 等. 15N同位素示踪技术研究辣椒器官氮素分配特性和基质氮素运移规律 [J]. 华北农学报, 2019,34(2):171-177. |
CAO C Q, ZHANG G B, HU L L, et al. Studies on nitrogen distribution characteristics of Capsicum organs and matrix nitrogen transportation law by15N isotope tracing technique [J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2019,34(2):171-177.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[15] | 邓兰生, 齐庆振, 龚林, 等. 滴施不同铵硝比例氮肥对马铃薯生长的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2011(4):13-16. |
DENG L S, QI Q Z, GONG L, et al. Influence of ammonium/nitrate ratio in treatment on growth of potato under fertigation[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2011(4):13-16.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[16] | 张春兰, 高祖明, 张耀栋, 等. 氮素形态和 $NO^{-}_{3}$N 与 $NH^{+}_{4}$-N 配比对菠菜生长和品质的影响 [J]. 南京农业大学学报, 1990,13(3):70-74. |
ZHANG C L, GAO Z M, ZHANG Y D, et al. The effects of different nitrogen forms and their concentration combinations on the growth and quality of spinach[J]. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University, 1990,13(3):70-74.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[17] | 李录山, 郁继华, 胡云飞, 等. 水肥耦合对西兰花抗逆性酶及产量的影响[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2015,50(5):54-58. |
LI L S, YU J H, HU Y F, et al. Effect of water and fertilizer coupling on cell defense enzymes and yield in broccoli[J]. Journal of Gansu Agricultural University, 2015,50(5):54-58.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[18] | 蔡晓, 吴祥运, 王东, 等. 水氮互作对滴灌夏玉米生长及水分利用效率的影响[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2020,39(6):33-42. |
CAI X, WU X Y, WANG D, et al. Combined effects of water and nitrogen application on growth and water use of summer maize under drip irrigation[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2020,39(6):33-42.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[19] | TISCHNER R. Nitrate uptake and reduction in higher and lower plants[J]. Plant, Cell & Environment, 2000,23(10):1005-1024. |
[20] | CHAMPIGNY M L. Integration of photosynthetic carbon and nitrogen metabolism in higher plants[J]. Photosynjournal Research, 1995,46(1/2):117-127. |
[21] | 李彩凤, 马凤鸣, 赵越, 等. 氮素形态对甜菜氮糖代谢关键酶活性及相关产物的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2003,29(1):128-132. |
LI C F, MA F M, ZHAO Y, et al. Effects of nitrogen forms on key enzyme activities and related products in sugar and nitrogen metabolism of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.)[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2003,29(1):128-132.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[22] |
OLIVEIRA I C, BRENNER E, CHIU J, et al. Metabolite and light regulation of metabolism in plants: lessons from the study of a single biochemical pathway[J]. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, 2001,34(5):567-575.
DOI URL PMID |
[23] | 曹慧, 王孝威, 邹岩梅, 等. 外源NO对水分胁迫下平邑甜茶幼苗中几种氮代谢酶的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2009,36(6):781-786. |
CAO H, WANG X W, ZOU Y M, et al. Effects of exogenous nitric oxide on the several enzymes of nitrogen metabolism in Malus hupehensis(Pamp.) Rehd. seedlings under water stress[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2009,36(6):781-786.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[24] | 李泽松, 林清华, 张楚富, 等. 不同氮源对水稻幼苗根氨同化酶的影响[J]. 武汉大学学报(自然科学版), 2000,46(6):729-732. |
LI Z S, LIN Q H, ZHANG C F, et al. Effect of different nitrogen sources on ammonia-assimilating enzymes of the roots in rice seedlings[J]. Journal of Wuhan University (Natural Science Edition), 2000,46(6):729-732.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[25] | 赵吉平, 任杰成, 郭鹏燕, 等. 施氮量对小麦氮素代谢关键酶活性的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2019,39(10):1222-1225. |
ZHAO J P, REN J C, GUO P Y, et al. Effect of nitrogen rates on key enzyme activities related to nitrogen metabolism in wheat[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2019,39(10):1222-1225.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[26] | 易旸. 水杨酸对水分胁迫下黄瓜(Cucumis sativus L.)幼苗光合及氮代谢的调节作用[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2009. |
YI Y. Regulation of salicylic acid on photosynthesis and nitrogen metabolism of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) seedlings under water stress[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2009.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[27] |
周箬涵, 郁继华, 杨兵丽, 等. 不同氮素形态及配比对娃娃菜产量、品质及其养分吸收的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2015,30(3):216-222.
DOI URL |
ZHOU R H, YU J H, YANG B L, et al. Effects of different nitrogen forms and ratios on yield, quality, and nutrient uptake of mini Chinese cabbage[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2015,30(3):216-222.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[28] | 黄碧阳, 林碧英, 林志斌, 等. 不同氮素形态及其配比对水培叶用甜菜生长和品质的影响[J]. 福建农林大学学报(自然科学版), 2017,46(3):254-259. |
HUANG B Y, LIN B Y, LIN Z B, et al. Effects of different nitrogen forms on the growth and quality of leaf beet[J]. Journal of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2017,46(3):254-259.(in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 陈贵, 鲁晨妮, 石艳平, 倪雄伟, 程旺大, 张红梅, 王保君, 张丽萍, 孙达. 不同缓控释肥搭配脲铵对水稻产量、氮素利用效率和土壤养分的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(1): 122-130. |
[2] | 陈贵, 陈梅, 张红梅, 王士磊, 施卫明, 程旺大. 籼粳杂交稻与常规粳稻产量、干物质氮素累积转运及氮素利用差异研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(12): 1992-2000. |
[3] | 张鸿, 朱从桦, 李星月, 李奇勇, 杨文钰, 任光俊. 水分胁迫对优质籼稻川香29B近等基因导入系产量和水分利用的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(6): 864-873. |
[4] | 杨子峰, 陈伟强, 王伟, 李婉怡, 何贤彪, 杨祥田. 轮作模式对西兰花耕作土壤微生物和酶活性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(5): 818-823. |
[5] | 刘君, 朱良其, 黑银秀, 刘灿, 谢菲, 何道根. 西兰花苗期生长模型的拟合和分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2016, 28(12): 2040-2046. |
[6] | 叶子飘, 杨小龙, 康华靖. C3和C4植物光能利用效率和水分利用效率的比较研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2016, 28(11): 1867-1873. |
[7] | 徐明飞1,孙彩霞1,章虎1,刘大群2,张棋1,叶雪珠1. 溴虫腈在露地和温室栽培西兰花花球及叶片的消解动态[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2015, 27(8): 1435-. |
[8] | 刘伟明;何道根;何贤彪. 种植密度和氮肥对‘绿雄90’西兰花产量与商品性的影响[J]. , 2010, 22(6): 824-828. |
[9] | 虞轶俊;汪恩国;陈林松;徐建章. 烟粉虱成虫在西兰花菜地种群分布型及抽样技术[J]. , 2007, 19(6): 0-448. |
[10] | 茹水江;王汉荣;王连平;李伟龙;苏英京;黄新灿;金昌林;赵建阳. 西兰花菌核病空间分布格局及抽样技术研究[J]. , 2006, 18(2): 0-66. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||