浙江农业学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (3): 450-459.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20250354
金慧1(
), 霍沁建2, 史跃伟2, 龙明锦2, 杨明华1, 杨敏敏1, 甘松梅1, 廉云1, 刘金亮1,*(
), 任学良2,*(
)
收稿日期:2025-05-02
出版日期:2026-03-25
发布日期:2026-04-17
作者简介:任学良,E-mail: renxuel@126.com通讯作者:
刘金亮,任学良
基金资助:
JIN Hui1(
), HUO Qinjian2, SHI Yuewei2, LONG Mingjin2, YANG Minghua1, YANG Minmin1, GAN Songmei1, LIAN Yun1, LIU Jinliang1,*(
), REN Xueliang2,*(
)
Received:2025-05-02
Published:2026-03-25
Online:2026-04-17
Contact:
LIU Jinliang,REN Xueliang
摘要:
为探寻化肥减量配施有机肥对烤烟生长和养分吸收利用的影响,以烤烟新品种贵烟5号为试验材料,采用二因素随机区组设计进行田间试验,设置3个化肥施用水平(A1,常规施肥;A2,减量20%;A3,减量40%)和2个有机肥配施水平(B1,750 kg·hm-2;B2,2 250 kg·hm-2),分析不同处理下烤烟生长、干物质积累与分配、养分吸收积累与分配等的变化。结果表明,化肥减量配施有机肥对打顶期贵烟5号的自然株高、自然叶数、打顶株高、留叶数、茎围、节距、最大叶长和最大叶宽等农艺性状并无显著影响。各处理相比,A2B2处理打顶期的根、茎,及整株干物质积累量,根的氮、磷积累量,茎的磷、钾积累量均显著(p<0.05)高于A3B1处理。在相同有机肥配施水平下,A3处理的氮、磷、钾肥农学利用率显著高于A1处理。综合来看,贵烟5号在生产中推荐在常规施肥基础上化肥减量20%并配施2 250 kg·hm-2有机肥的方案,可在减少化肥施用量的同时,提高烟株对养分的吸收利用率。
中图分类号:
金慧, 霍沁建, 史跃伟, 龙明锦, 杨明华, 杨敏敏, 甘松梅, 廉云, 刘金亮, 任学良. 遵义烟区化肥减量配施有机肥对贵烟5号生长和养分吸收利用的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2026, 38(3): 450-459.
JIN Hui, HUO Qinjian, SHI Yuewei, LONG Mingjin, YANG Minghua, YANG Minmin, GAN Songmei, LIAN Yun, LIU Jinliang, REN Xueliang. Effects of chemical fertilizer reduction and organic fertilizer application on the growth, nutrient uptake and utilization of flue-cured tobacco cultivar Guiyan5 in Zunyi tobacco area of China[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2026, 38(3): 450-459.
| 处理 Treatment | 自然株高/cm Natural plant height/cm | 自然叶数 Natural leaf number | 打顶株高/cm Topped plant height/cm | 留叶数 Retained leaf number | 茎围/cm Stem circum- ference/cm | 节距/cm Internode length/cm | 最大叶长/cm Maximum leaf length/cm | 最大叶宽/cm Maximum leaf width/cm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1B1 | 147.89±0.88 a | 26.11±0.51 a | 118.81±3.40 a | 19.67±0.88 a | 10.11±0.37 a | 7.26±0.19 a | 66.30±3.52 a | 35.93±3.02 a |
| A2B1 | 142.00±3.09 a | 26.00±1.15 a | 119.56±1.42 a | 19.78±0.19 a | 10.71±0.39 a | 6.86±0.22 a | 67.03±0.76 a | 35.28±1.84 a |
| A3B1 | 152.66±13.25 a | 26.22±1.07 a | 123.54±5.94 a | 19.33±0.88 a | 10.47±0.26 a | 7.53±0.39 a | 69.96±2.82 a | 35.71±1.31 a |
| A1B2 | 146.88±4.22 a | 25.89±0.19 a | 122.53±5.08 a | 20.44±0.69 a | 10.57±0.33 a | 7.12±0.74 a | 68.31±3.85 a | 35.94±0.83 a |
| A2B2 | 146.31±0.95 a | 26.00±1.20 a | 119.88±3.31 a | 19.56±1.50 a | 10.38±0.65 a | 7.48±0.39 a | 66.19±4.76 a | 33.83±2.82 a |
| A3B2 | 148.38±5.71 a | 26.00±0.32 a | 123.69±6.38 a | 19.78±1.02 a | 10.18±0.05 a | 7.01±0.23 a | 67.12±1.56 a | 34.13±0.94 a |
表1 各处理的农艺性状
Table 1 Agronomic traits of treatments
| 处理 Treatment | 自然株高/cm Natural plant height/cm | 自然叶数 Natural leaf number | 打顶株高/cm Topped plant height/cm | 留叶数 Retained leaf number | 茎围/cm Stem circum- ference/cm | 节距/cm Internode length/cm | 最大叶长/cm Maximum leaf length/cm | 最大叶宽/cm Maximum leaf width/cm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1B1 | 147.89±0.88 a | 26.11±0.51 a | 118.81±3.40 a | 19.67±0.88 a | 10.11±0.37 a | 7.26±0.19 a | 66.30±3.52 a | 35.93±3.02 a |
| A2B1 | 142.00±3.09 a | 26.00±1.15 a | 119.56±1.42 a | 19.78±0.19 a | 10.71±0.39 a | 6.86±0.22 a | 67.03±0.76 a | 35.28±1.84 a |
| A3B1 | 152.66±13.25 a | 26.22±1.07 a | 123.54±5.94 a | 19.33±0.88 a | 10.47±0.26 a | 7.53±0.39 a | 69.96±2.82 a | 35.71±1.31 a |
| A1B2 | 146.88±4.22 a | 25.89±0.19 a | 122.53±5.08 a | 20.44±0.69 a | 10.57±0.33 a | 7.12±0.74 a | 68.31±3.85 a | 35.94±0.83 a |
| A2B2 | 146.31±0.95 a | 26.00±1.20 a | 119.88±3.31 a | 19.56±1.50 a | 10.38±0.65 a | 7.48±0.39 a | 66.19±4.76 a | 33.83±2.82 a |
| A3B2 | 148.38±5.71 a | 26.00±0.32 a | 123.69±6.38 a | 19.78±1.02 a | 10.18±0.05 a | 7.01±0.23 a | 67.12±1.56 a | 34.13±0.94 a |
图1 团棵期各处理的根、茎、叶干物质积累量及其分配系数 同系列柱上无相同字母的表示处理间差异显著(p<0.05)。下同。
Fig.1 Dry matter accumulation and partition coefficient of root, stem and leaf under treatments at rosette stage Bars marked without the same letters indicate significant (p<0.05) difference within treatments in the same series. The same as below.
| 处理 Treatment | AE/% | LPE/(g·g-1) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | P2O5 | K2O | N | P2O5 | K2O | |
| A1B1 | 27.05±2.08 cd | 28.17±2.17 bc | 11.74±0.90 bc | 19.48±1.48 a | 218.36±11.30 a | 24.16±3.30 a |
| A2B1 | 30.95±1.47 bc | 32.54±1.55 bc | 13.56±0.65 bc | 18.98±0.45 a | 218.93±8.42 a | 26.46±0.92 a |
| A3B1 | 37.13±1.79 a | 39.64±1.91 a | 16.52±0.80 a | 19.17±0.56 a | 221.43±7.84 a | 24.71±0.93 a |
| A1B2 | 23.18±2.29 d | 25.87±2.55 c | 10.78±1.06 c | 18.72±0.59 a | 211.53±1.89 a | 24.93±2.28 a |
| A2B2 | 30.46±4.88 bc | 34.76±5.56 ab | 14.49±2.32 ab | 18.81±0.33 a | 209.46±9.46 a | 25.12±2.73 a |
| A3B2 | 34.19±4.57 ab | 40.36±5.39 a | 16.83±2.25 a | 18.75±0.65 a | 218.43±9.04 a | 27.23±1.98 a |
表2 各处理的肥料农学利用率(AE)和烟叶生产效率(LPE)
Table 2 Fertilizer agronomic efficiency (AE) and tobacco leaf production efficiency (LPE)
| 处理 Treatment | AE/% | LPE/(g·g-1) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | P2O5 | K2O | N | P2O5 | K2O | |
| A1B1 | 27.05±2.08 cd | 28.17±2.17 bc | 11.74±0.90 bc | 19.48±1.48 a | 218.36±11.30 a | 24.16±3.30 a |
| A2B1 | 30.95±1.47 bc | 32.54±1.55 bc | 13.56±0.65 bc | 18.98±0.45 a | 218.93±8.42 a | 26.46±0.92 a |
| A3B1 | 37.13±1.79 a | 39.64±1.91 a | 16.52±0.80 a | 19.17±0.56 a | 221.43±7.84 a | 24.71±0.93 a |
| A1B2 | 23.18±2.29 d | 25.87±2.55 c | 10.78±1.06 c | 18.72±0.59 a | 211.53±1.89 a | 24.93±2.28 a |
| A2B2 | 30.46±4.88 bc | 34.76±5.56 ab | 14.49±2.32 ab | 18.81±0.33 a | 209.46±9.46 a | 25.12±2.73 a |
| A3B2 | 34.19±4.57 ab | 40.36±5.39 a | 16.83±2.25 a | 18.75±0.65 a | 218.43±9.04 a | 27.23±1.98 a |
| [1] | 林小兵, 柳开楼, 黄尚书, 等. 长期施肥对旱地红壤微生物生物量碳、氮和酶活性的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2023, 38(4): 119-128. |
| LIN X B, LIU K L, HUANG S S, et al. Effects of long-term fertilization on microbial biomass carbon, nitrogen and enzyme activities in upland red soil[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2023, 38(4): 119-128. | |
| [2] | 汤宏, 曾掌权, 张杨珠, 等. 化学氮肥配施有机肥对烟草品质、氮素吸收及利用率的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2019, 34(4): 183-191. |
| TANG H, ZENG Z Q, ZHANG Y Z, et al. Leaf quality, nitrogen uptake and nitrogen use efficiency of tobacco under combination of chemical nitrogen fertilizer with organic fertilizer[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2019, 34(4): 183-191. | |
| [3] | 李姣, 刘国顺, 高琴, 等. 不同生物有机肥与烟草专用复合肥配施对烤烟根际土壤微生物及土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 河南农业大学学报, 2013, 47(2): 132-137. |
| LI J, LIU G S, GAO Q, et al. Effect of application of different bio-organic fertilizer with tobacco specific chemical fertilizer on the amount of microbe and enzyme activities in the rhizosphere soil of flue-cured tobacco[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural University, 2013, 47(2): 132-137. | |
| [4] | 周晓, 朱旭, 阚宏伟, 等. 配施不同比例有机肥对烤烟光合作用及产质量的影响[J]. 广西农业科学, 2009, 40(5): 517-520. |
| ZHOU X, ZHU X, KAN H W, et al. Effects of combined application with different ratios of organic fertilizers on photosynthesis, yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco[J]. Guangxi Agricultural Sciences, 2009, 40(5): 517-520. | |
| [5] | 钟曙英, 卢彬荣, 傅林, 等. 定制有机肥施用量对龙岩烤烟生长和产质量的影响[J]. 江西农业学报, 2022, 34(10): 82-87. |
| ZHONG S Y, LU B R, FU L, et al. Effects of customized organic fertilizer amount on growth, yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco in Longyan[J]. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi, 2022, 34(10): 82-87. | |
| [6] | 王奥宇, 魏建林, 马垒, 等. 有机肥替代部分化肥对麦田土壤肥力及产能的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2024, 56(10): 113-118. |
| WANG A Y, WEI J L, MA L, et al. Impacts of partial replacement of chemical fertilizer with organic fertilizer on soil fertility and productivity in wheat fields[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 56(10): 113-118. | |
| [7] | 路登杰, 王婷, 罗以贵, 等. 有机肥与无机肥配施对烤烟K326产质量的影响[J]. 现代农业科技, 2017(10): 1-3. |
| LU D J, WANG T, LUO Y G, et al. Application effect of organic fertilizer and chemical fertilizer on yield and quality of tobacco K326[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2017(10): 1-3. | |
| [8] | 徐兴阳, 张晓伟, 刘忠华, 等. 有机无机复混肥配施钾长石土壤调理剂对烤烟产质量及养分利用率的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(15): 104-110. |
| XU X Y, ZHANG X W, LIU Z H, et al. Effects of organic and inorganic compound fertilizer combined with potassium feldspar soil conditioner on yield, quality and nutrient utilization rate of flue-cured tobacco[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(15): 104-110. | |
| [9] | 聂庆凯, 王静, 孙兴广, 等. 有机肥部分替代化肥对植烟土壤生化特性和烤烟品质的影响[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2020, 41(4): 26-32. |
| NIE Q K, WANG J, SUN X G, et al. The effects of organic fertilizers partly replacing chemical fertilizers on biochemical characteristics of soil and quality of flue-cured tobacco[J]. Chinese Tobacco Science, 2020, 41(4): 26-32. | |
| [10] | 杨云高, 王树林, 刘国, 等. 生物有机肥对烤烟产质量及土壤改良的影响[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2012, 33(4): 70-74. |
| YANG Y G, WANG S L, LIU G, et al. Effects of bio-organic fertilizer on yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco and soil improvement[J]. Chinese Tobacco Science, 2012, 33(4): 70-74. | |
| [11] | 李艳平, 刘国顺, 丁松爽, 等. 混合有机肥用量对烤烟根系活力及根际土壤生物特性的影响[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2016, 37(1): 32-36. |
| LI Y P, LIU G S, DING S S, et al. Effects of mixed organic fertilizer amount on root vigor and rhizosphere soil biological characteristics of flue-cured tobacco[J]. Chinese Tobacco Science, 2016, 37(1): 32-36. | |
| [12] | 田丰, 黄士航, 区禧贤, 等. 有机肥配施化肥对烟草生长、养分吸收及分配的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2024, 52(18): 138-146. |
| TIAN F, HUANG T H, OU X X, et al. Influences of organic fertilizer combined with chemical fertilizer on tobacco growth, nutrient absorption and distribution[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 52(18): 138-146. | |
| [13] | 王日俊, 黄成东, 徐照丽, 等. 基于中国知网的有机无机配施对烤烟产量与品质影响的整合分析[J]. 土壤, 2021, 53(6): 1185-1191. |
| WANG R J, HUANG C D, XU Z L, et al. Meta-analysis of effects of combined application of organic and inorganic fertilizers on yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco based on CNKI database[J]. Soils, 2021, 53(6): 1185-1191. | |
| [14] | 张书豪, 王玉洁, 黄培元, 等. 化肥减量配施羊粪有机肥对烤烟生长、产质量及土壤养分的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2024, 56(4): 72-80. |
| ZHANG S H, WANG Y J, HUANG P Y, et al. Effects of chemical fertilizer reduction combined with sheep manure organic fertilizer on growth, yield, quality and soil nutrients of flue-cured tobacco[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 56(4): 72-80. | |
| [15] | 宋建群, 徐智, 汤利, 等. 不同有机肥对烤烟养分吸收及化肥利用率的影响[J]. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学), 2015, 30(3): 471-476. |
| SONG J Q, XU Z, TANG L, et al. Effects of different organic fertilizers on nutrient absorption and fertilizer use efficiency of flue-cured tobacco[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University(Natural Science), 2015, 30(3): 471-476. | |
| [16] | 林力, 廉云, 刘金亮. 减量化肥配施有机肥一次性基施对烤烟大田生育期养分积累、分配及利用的影响[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2022, 51(6): 441-450. |
| LIN L, LIAN Y, LIU J L. Effects of reduced chemical fertilizer combined with organic fertilizer one-time base application on nutrient accumulation, distribution and utilization of flue-cured tobacco during the field growth period[J]. Subtropical Plant Science, 2022, 51(6): 441-450. | |
| [17] | 李禹, 马建彬, 代惠娟, 等. 氮肥减施对烤烟生长及氮肥利用效率的影响[J]. 广东农业科学, 2024, 51(8): 92-103. |
| LI Y, MA J B, DAI H J, et al. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer reduction on growth and nitrogen use efficiency of flue-cured tobacco[J]. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 51(8): 92-103. | |
| [18] | 林力. 烟—菜下减量化肥配施有机肥对烤烟和白菜产质量的影响[D]. 贵阳: 贵州大学, 2023. |
| LIN L. Effects of reduced chemical fertilizer combined with organic fertilizer on yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco and Chinese cabbage under tobacco-vegetable rotation system[D]. Guiyang: Guizhou University, 2023. | |
| [19] | 齐虹凌, 王福鑫, 王潮钟, 等. 化肥减施对烤烟根系和烟株产质量的影响[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2010(12): 38-40. |
| QI H L, WANG F X, WANG C Z, et al. Effects of reducing amount of chemical-fertilizers on the flue-cured tobacco root, yield and quality[J]. Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2010(12): 38-40. | |
| [20] | 王仁刚, 王自力, 林世锋, 等. 烤烟新品种贵烟5号的选育及特征特性[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2022, 43(1): 1-5. |
| WANG R G, WANG Z L, LIN S F, et al. Breeding and characteristics of a new flue-cured tobacco variety Guiyan5[J]. Chinese Tobacco Science, 2022, 43(1): 1-5. | |
| [21] | LIU J A, SHU A P, SONG W F, et al. Long-term organic fertilizer substitution increases rice yield by improving soil properties and regulating soil bacteria[J]. Geoderma, 2021, 404: 115287. |
| [22] | 刘魁, 田阳阳, 王正旭, 等. 有机肥替代部分化肥对烤烟生长及烟叶质量的影响[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2020(12): 24-27. |
| LIU K, TIAN Y Y, WANG Z X, et al. Effects of organic fertilizer replacing part of chemical fertilizer on growth and quality of flue-cured tobacco[J]. Hunan Agricultural Sciences, 2020(12): 24-27. | |
| [23] | 张四伟, 李根原, 朱利群, 等. 不同有机肥与烟草专用肥配施对烤烟生长、土壤微生物量、产质量及黑胫病的影响[J]. 江西农业学报, 2015, 27(11): 39-43. |
| ZHANG S W, LI G Y, ZHU L Q, et al. Effects of combined application of different organic fertilizer and tobacco-special chemical fertilizer on soil microbial biomass, and growth, yield, quality and black shank of flue-cured tobacco[J]. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi, 2015, 27(11): 39-43. | |
| [24] | 张文婧. 攀枝花烟区肥料资源供需平衡与有机无机肥配施对烤烟生长、产质量的影响[D]. 雅安: 四川农业大学, 2014. |
| ZHANG W J. Supply and demand balance of fertilizer resources in Panzhihua smoke zone and effects of combining the organic and chemical fertilizers on flue-cured tobacco growth, yield, quality[D]. Ya’an: Sichuan Agricultural University, 2014. | |
| [25] | 刘卫群, 郭群召, 汪庆昌, 等. 不同施氮水平对烤烟干物质、氮素积累分配及产质的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2004, 33(8): 25-28. |
| LIU W Q, GUO Q Z, WANG Q C, et al. Influence of different nitrogen levels on yield, quality, dry matter and nitrogen accumulation and distribution of flue-cured tobacco[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2004, 33(8): 25-28. | |
| [26] | 邓小华, 王新月, 杨红武, 等. 粉垄耕作深度对烤烟生长和物质积累及烟叶产质量的影响[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2020, 41(5): 28-35. |
| DENG X H, WANG X Y, YANG H W, et al. Effects of smashing ridge tillage on growth, dry matter accumulation, output and quality of flue-cured tobacco[J]. Chinese Tobacco Science, 2020, 41(5): 28-35. | |
| [27] | 朱英华, 田维强, 芶剑渝, 等. 有机无机复混肥对水稻土烤烟养分积累、分配与利用的影响[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2019, 40(2): 30-37. |
| ZHU Y H, TIAN W Q, GOU J Y, et al. Effects of organic-inorganic compound fertilizers on nutrient accumulation, distribution, and utilization ratio of flue-cured tobacco in paddy soil[J]. Chinese Tobacco Science, 2019, 40(2): 30-37. | |
| [28] | 张翔, 毛家伟, 黄元炯, 等. 不同施肥处理烤烟氮磷钾吸收分配规律研究[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2012, 18(1): 53-57. |
| ZHANG X, MAO J W, HUANG Y J, et al. Studies on laws of N, P, K uptake and distribution of flue-cured tobacco with different fertilizer treatments[J]. Acta Tabacaria Sinica, 2012, 18(1): 53-57. | |
| [29] | 王军, 田俊岭, 刘兰, 等. 施肥水平对烤烟的干物质、养分积累及分配的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(22): 8-14. |
| WANG J, TIAN J L, LIU L, et al. Effects of different fertilization levels on dry matter and nutrient accumulation and distribution in flue-cured tobacco[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(22): 8-14. | |
| [30] | 杨明华, 李永东, 林力, 等. 氮钾肥配施对烤烟生长及养分利用的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2024, 52(8): 73-80. |
| YANG M H, LI Y D, LIN L, et al. Influences of nitrogen and potassium combined application on growth and nutrient utilization of flue-cured tobacco[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 52(8): 73-80. |
| [1] | 马京民, 严定伟, 刘新源, 常剑波, 韩振华, 韦凤杰, 姬小明. 叶面喷施钾肥与鼠李糖脂混合液对烤烟油分和产质量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2026, 38(3): 440-449. |
| [2] | 巴仕浩, 童文彬, 杨海峻, 江建锋, 李子川, 吴春艳, 唐旭, 柴彦君, 李艳. 沼液施用协同化肥减量在茭白生产和土壤改良上的效果[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2026, 38(1): 126-135. |
| [3] | 韦庆翠, 姜娜英, 沈骏扬, 张焕朝, 张衡锋. 化肥减量配施生物质炭对高沙土氮磷淋失及土壤性质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(9): 1943-1950. |
| [4] | 耿锐梅, 赵清海, 曹长代, 李峰, 王大海, 贺鹏霖, 刘洋, 李军民, 徐蕊, 宋志美, 胡海洲, 张玉. 烤烟品种中川208和CV87根际细菌群落分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(7): 1512-1520. |
| [5] | 张敏, 张阳, 申婧, 虎陈霞. 化肥减量增效目标下配方肥补贴数字化转型的政企农三方演化博弈分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(7): 1567-1579. |
| [6] | 张智, 何豪豪, 郁妙, 许剑锋. 化肥减量配施土壤改良剂对土壤酸度、土壤养分和水稻产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(6): 1301-1308. |
| [7] | 应永飞, 韩东轩, 孟芳, 俞遴, 沈佳栾, 汪开英. 沼液替代化肥对水稻产量、品质和土壤特性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(4): 880-891. |
| [8] | 沈佳瑜, 邓燕, 李贝, 王佳雨, 张姬雯, 彭国方, 吴群, 朱齐超, 张卫峰, 段志平. 优化施肥管理对常山胡柚产量、品质与温室气体排放的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(11): 2293-2307. |
| [9] | 胡铁军. 化肥减量配施微生物肥对西蓝花产量品质与土壤性质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(7): 1657-1665. |
| [10] | 刘春奎, 李紫琳, 韦小玲, 贾琳, 夏阳, 龙李进, 贺远, 李波, 闫洪洋, 张博莹. 不同时期叶面喷施钼肥对烤烟香味成分的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(3): 481-493. |
| [11] | 卢昕博, 袁颖, 王骏, 汪华文, 夏骏, 吴丹, 田金虎, 叶兴乾, 尹洁, 蒋健. 挤压处理对加热卷烟用烤烟烟叶化学组分和香气的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(12): 2803-2811. |
| [12] | 岳宗伟, 李嘉骁, 孙向阳, 刘国梁, 李素艳, 王晨晨, 查贵超, 魏宁娴. 化肥有机肥配施对土壤性质、樱桃果实品质和产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(9): 2192-2201. |
| [13] | 茹朝, 郁继华, 武玥, 冯致, 缑兆辉, 金宁, 王舒亚, 刘泽慈, 吕剑. 化肥减量配施生物有机肥对露地大白菜产量及品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(8): 1626-1637. |
| [14] | 陈闺, 周杰文, 李海平, 张发明, 李春顺, 柳立, 张毅. 土壤调理剂施用对植烟酸化土壤pH值和烤烟根系特性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(7): 1275-1282. |
| [15] | 鲁黎明, 曾孝敏, 顾会战, 张启莉, 喻晓, 王栋, 何佶弦, 李立芹. 施氮量对烤烟氮代谢关键酶基因表达及代谢产物的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(3): 454-460. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||