浙江农业学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (7): 1400-1409.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20250429
刘光炎(
), 熊海燕, 周梅, 李正敏, 王金燕, 陈晶晶, 张玉, 王超*(
)
收稿日期:2025-06-11
出版日期:2026-07-25
发布日期:2026-08-20
作者简介:刘光炎,研究方向为风景园林(植物方向)。E-mail:lgy112818@dingtalk.com
通讯作者:
*王超,E-mail: 47188127@qq.com
基金资助:
LIU Guangyan(
), XIONG Haiyan, ZHOU Mei, LI Zhengmin, WANG Jinyan, CHEN Jingjing, ZHANG Yu, WANG Chao*(
)
Received:2025-06-11
Published:2026-07-25
Online:2026-08-20
摘要: 为明确引起绣球炭疽病的病原菌并探寻适宜的防治方法,本研究对大叶绣球品种湖蓝的炭疽病样本,采用组织分离法进行病原菌分离,结合柯赫氏法则验证其致病性,并通过形态学特征和基于ITS、Actin、TUB2、CHS-1和GAPDH多基因序列构建的系统发育树分析,对病原菌进行鉴定。采用菌丝生长速率法,研究不同培养基、碳源、氮源、温度、光照和pH值对病原菌菌丝生长的影响;选取5种常用杀菌剂和32个常见绣球品种,测定其对病原菌的室内毒力和抗病性。结果表明,该炭疽病病原菌为喀斯特炭疽菌(Colletotrichum karstii),其在25 ℃、pH值为7、马铃薯葡萄糖琼脂培养基、碳源为木糖、氮源为牛肉膏的条件下生长较好,但对光照条件不敏感,致死温度为56 ℃持续10 min。室内毒力测定结果显示,50%腐霉·福美双的抑菌效果最佳,其有效中浓度(EC50)为0.075 4 mg·L-1。品种抗性评价显示,蓝色海洋、万紫千红、博大蓝、倩影、雪花、人面桃花、紫鹃和星空为免疫品种。本研究是喀斯特炭疽菌引起的绣球炭疽病在中国的首次报道。
中图分类号:
刘光炎, 熊海燕, 周梅, 李正敏, 王金燕, 陈晶晶, 张玉, 王超. 绣球湖蓝炭疽病病原菌的分离、鉴定与防治[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2026, 38(7): 1400-1409.
LIU Guangyan, XIONG Haiyan, ZHOU Mei, LI Zhengmin, WANG Jinyan, CHEN Jingjing, ZHANG Yu, WANG Chao. Isolation, identification and control of the pathogen of anthracnose in Hydrangea macrophylla Hulan[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2026, 38(7): 1400-1409.
图2 分离菌株H3F20回接湖蓝萼片的症状 A,对照;B和C,接种菌株H3F20后7 d的症状。
Fig.2 Symptom of Hulan inoculated with isolated fungus H3F20 A, Control; B and C, 7 days after inoculation with strain H3F20.
图3 菌株H3F20的形态特征 A,在PDA上培养15 d的菌落特征;B和C,分生孢子梗和孢子形态。
Fig.3 Morphological characteristics of strain H3F20 A, Colony on PDA at 15 d; B and C, Conidiophores and spore morphology.
图4 菌株H3F20与相关菌株基于ITS、Actin、TUB2、CHS-1和GAPDH序列构建的系统发育树
Fig.4 Phylogenetic tree based on ITS, Actin, TUB2, CHS-1, and GAPDH sequences of H3F20 and related strains
图5 不同培养条件对菌株H3F20菌丝生长速率的影响 LB,酵母膏蛋白胨琼脂培养基;MEA,麦芽糖琼脂培养基;CMA,玉米粉琼脂培养基;OMA,燕麦琼脂培养基;PDA,马铃薯葡萄糖琼脂培养基;CS,察氏培养基。柱上无相同小写字母表示组间差异显著(p<0.05)。
Fig.5 Effect of different culture conditions on the mycelial growth rate of H3F20 strain LB, Luria-Bertani agar culture medium; MEA, Malt extract agar culture medium; CMA, Corn meal agar culture medium; OMA, Oatmeal agar culture medium; PDA, Potato dextrose agar culture medium; CS, Czapek medium. Bars marked without the same lowercase letters indicate significant (p<0.05) differences between treatments.
| 杀菌剂 Fungicide | 质量浓度/ (mg·L-1) Mass concentra- tion/(mg·L-1) | H3F20平均菌落 直径/mm Average colony diameter/mm | 抑菌率/% Inhibition rate/% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 72%烯酰· | 720 | 24.08 | 58.92 |
| 锰锌WP 72% | 900 | 23.35 | 60.17 |
| Dimethomorph+ | 1 200 | 21.73 | 62.93 |
| mancozeb WP | 1 800 | 20.22 | 65.51 |
| 3 600 | 10.06 | 82.84 | |
| 50%腐霉· | 500 | 19.31 | 67.06 |
| 福美双WG 50% | 625 | 19.16 | 67.32 |
| Thiram+ | 833 | 18.25 | 68.87 |
| procymidone WG | 1 250 | 17.17 | 70.71 |
| 2 500 | 12.70 | 78.33 | |
| 70%烯酰· | 700 | 34.75 | 40.73 |
| 霜脲氰WP 70% | 875 | 29.34 | 49.95 |
| Dimethomorph+ | 1 166 | 21.66 | 63.05 |
| cymoxanil WP | 1 750 | 19.975 | 65.93 |
| 3 500 | 10.70 | 81.74 | |
| 50%多菌灵 | 500 | 54.63 | 6.82 |
| WP 50% | 625 | 54.195 | 7.56 |
| Carbendazim WP | 833 | 46.15 | 21.28 |
| 1 250 | 24.46 | 58.28 | |
| 2 500 | 36.365 | 37.97 | |
| 80%烯酰吗啉 | 800 | 51.06 | 12.91 |
| WG 80% | 1 000 | 47.65 | 18.72 |
| Dimethomorph | 1 333 | 45.275 | 22.77 |
| WG | 2 000 | 42.06 | 28.26 |
| 4 000 | 39.49 | 32.64 |
表1 5种供试杀菌剂对H3F20菌丝生长的抑制作用
Table 1 Inhibitory effects of five tested fungicides on mycelial growth of H3F20
| 杀菌剂 Fungicide | 质量浓度/ (mg·L-1) Mass concentra- tion/(mg·L-1) | H3F20平均菌落 直径/mm Average colony diameter/mm | 抑菌率/% Inhibition rate/% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 72%烯酰· | 720 | 24.08 | 58.92 |
| 锰锌WP 72% | 900 | 23.35 | 60.17 |
| Dimethomorph+ | 1 200 | 21.73 | 62.93 |
| mancozeb WP | 1 800 | 20.22 | 65.51 |
| 3 600 | 10.06 | 82.84 | |
| 50%腐霉· | 500 | 19.31 | 67.06 |
| 福美双WG 50% | 625 | 19.16 | 67.32 |
| Thiram+ | 833 | 18.25 | 68.87 |
| procymidone WG | 1 250 | 17.17 | 70.71 |
| 2 500 | 12.70 | 78.33 | |
| 70%烯酰· | 700 | 34.75 | 40.73 |
| 霜脲氰WP 70% | 875 | 29.34 | 49.95 |
| Dimethomorph+ | 1 166 | 21.66 | 63.05 |
| cymoxanil WP | 1 750 | 19.975 | 65.93 |
| 3 500 | 10.70 | 81.74 | |
| 50%多菌灵 | 500 | 54.63 | 6.82 |
| WP 50% | 625 | 54.195 | 7.56 |
| Carbendazim WP | 833 | 46.15 | 21.28 |
| 1 250 | 24.46 | 58.28 | |
| 2 500 | 36.365 | 37.97 | |
| 80%烯酰吗啉 | 800 | 51.06 | 12.91 |
| WG 80% | 1 000 | 47.65 | 18.72 |
| Dimethomorph | 1 333 | 45.275 | 22.77 |
| WG | 2 000 | 42.06 | 28.26 |
| 4 000 | 39.49 | 32.64 |
| 杀菌剂 Fungicide | 毒力回归方程 Toxicity regression equation | r | EC50/(mg·L-1) | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 72%烯酰·锰锌WP 72% Dimethomorph + mancozeb WP | y=1.010 5x+5.290 1 | 0.942 1 | 0.516 3 | 0.016 6 |
| 50%腐霉·福美双WG 50% Thiram + procymidone WG | y=0.190 8x+5.551 1 | 0.961 0 | 0.075 4 | 0.009 2 |
| 70%烯酰·霜脲氰WP 70% Dimethomorph + cymoxanil WP | y=1.540 1x+5.086 0 | 0.979 0 | 0.879 4 | 0.003 6 |
| 50%多菌灵WP 50% Carbendazim WP | y=2.080 9x+4.274 2 | 0.786 5 | 2.232 4 | 0.114 5 |
| 80%烯酰吗啉WG 80% Dimethomorph WG | y=0.912 5x+4.072 2 | 0.944 8 | 10.393 0 | 0.015 4 |
表2 5种供试杀菌剂的毒力回归方程
Table 2 Toxicity regression equations of the five tested fungicides
| 杀菌剂 Fungicide | 毒力回归方程 Toxicity regression equation | r | EC50/(mg·L-1) | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 72%烯酰·锰锌WP 72% Dimethomorph + mancozeb WP | y=1.010 5x+5.290 1 | 0.942 1 | 0.516 3 | 0.016 6 |
| 50%腐霉·福美双WG 50% Thiram + procymidone WG | y=0.190 8x+5.551 1 | 0.961 0 | 0.075 4 | 0.009 2 |
| 70%烯酰·霜脲氰WP 70% Dimethomorph + cymoxanil WP | y=1.540 1x+5.086 0 | 0.979 0 | 0.879 4 | 0.003 6 |
| 50%多菌灵WP 50% Carbendazim WP | y=2.080 9x+4.274 2 | 0.786 5 | 2.232 4 | 0.114 5 |
| 80%烯酰吗啉WG 80% Dimethomorph WG | y=0.912 5x+4.072 2 | 0.944 8 | 10.393 0 | 0.015 4 |
| 品种 Variety | 病斑直径/mm Diameter of lesion/mm | 抗病性级别 Resistance level | 品种 Variety | 病斑直径/mm Diameter of lesion/mm | 抗病性级别 Resistance level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 紫鸢Ziyuan | 2.27 | MS | 瑞雪Ruixue | 1.41 | HR |
| 碧玉Biyu | 1.32 | HR | 蔚蓝天空Weilantiankong | 1.64 | R |
| 珠圆玉润Zhuyuanyurun | 1.53 | R | 如嫣Ruyan | 2.91 | S |
| 团圆Tuanyuan | 3.17 | HS | 万紫千红Wanziqianhong | 0 | I |
| 盛世之花Shengshizhihua | 2.49 | MS | 博大蓝Bodalan | 0 | I |
| 蓝色海洋Lansehaiyang | 0 | I | 蓝宝石Lanbaoshi | 1.83 | R |
| 五彩缤纷Wucaibinfen | 1.88 | R | 蓝天Lantian | 0.86 | HR |
| 梦境Mengjing | 2.76 | S | 翘瓣蓝Qiaobanlan | 3.26 | HS |
| 金匮Jinkui | 1.51 | R | 蓝水晶Lanshuijing | 1.56 | R |
| 繁星Fanxing | 1.32 | HR | 雪韵Xueyun | 2.36 | MS |
| 碧空Bikong | 2.22 | MS | 琥珀Hupo | 2.98 | S |
| 紫水晶Zishuijing | 2.07 | MS | 倩影Qianying | 0 | I |
| 花团锦簇Huatuanjincu | 2.51 | S | 雪花Xuehua | 0 | I |
| 粉黛Fendai | 0.83 | HR | 人面桃花Renmiantaohua | 0 | I |
| 白雪Baixue | 1.86 | R | 紫鹃Zijuan | 0 | I |
| 璞玉Puyu | 1.62 | R | 星空Xingkong | 0 | I |
表3 供试绣球品种对菌株H3F20的抗病性
Table 3 Disease resistance of tested hydrangea varieties to strain H3F20
| 品种 Variety | 病斑直径/mm Diameter of lesion/mm | 抗病性级别 Resistance level | 品种 Variety | 病斑直径/mm Diameter of lesion/mm | 抗病性级别 Resistance level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 紫鸢Ziyuan | 2.27 | MS | 瑞雪Ruixue | 1.41 | HR |
| 碧玉Biyu | 1.32 | HR | 蔚蓝天空Weilantiankong | 1.64 | R |
| 珠圆玉润Zhuyuanyurun | 1.53 | R | 如嫣Ruyan | 2.91 | S |
| 团圆Tuanyuan | 3.17 | HS | 万紫千红Wanziqianhong | 0 | I |
| 盛世之花Shengshizhihua | 2.49 | MS | 博大蓝Bodalan | 0 | I |
| 蓝色海洋Lansehaiyang | 0 | I | 蓝宝石Lanbaoshi | 1.83 | R |
| 五彩缤纷Wucaibinfen | 1.88 | R | 蓝天Lantian | 0.86 | HR |
| 梦境Mengjing | 2.76 | S | 翘瓣蓝Qiaobanlan | 3.26 | HS |
| 金匮Jinkui | 1.51 | R | 蓝水晶Lanshuijing | 1.56 | R |
| 繁星Fanxing | 1.32 | HR | 雪韵Xueyun | 2.36 | MS |
| 碧空Bikong | 2.22 | MS | 琥珀Hupo | 2.98 | S |
| 紫水晶Zishuijing | 2.07 | MS | 倩影Qianying | 0 | I |
| 花团锦簇Huatuanjincu | 2.51 | S | 雪花Xuehua | 0 | I |
| 粉黛Fendai | 0.83 | HR | 人面桃花Renmiantaohua | 0 | I |
| 白雪Baixue | 1.86 | R | 紫鹃Zijuan | 0 | I |
| 璞玉Puyu | 1.62 | R | 星空Xingkong | 0 | I |
| [1] | 邓衍明, 韩勇, 齐香玉, 等. 绣球属植物种质资源分析及其花色可调性和叶斑病抗性比较[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2018, 27(4): 90-100. |
| Deng Y M, Han Y, Qi X Y, et al. Analysis on germplasm resources of species in Hydrangea Linn. and comparisons on their flower color variability and resistance to leaf spot disease[J]. Journal of Plant Resources and Environment, 2018, 27(4): 90-100. | |
| [2] | Sacco E, Savona M, Antonetti M, et al. In vitro propagation and regeneration of several Hydrangea genotypes[J]. Acta Horticulturae, 2012(937): 565-572. |
| [3] | Dirr M A. Manual of woody landscape plants[M]. Champaign: Stipes Publishing, 2001. |
| [4] | 谢治东, 刘生祥, 戴帮潮, 等. 绣球花色调控技术研究[J]. 安徽林业科技, 2020, 46(5): 19-22. |
| Xie Z D, Liu S X, Dai B C, et al. Study on regulation techniques for flower colors of Hydrangea macrophylla[J]. Anhui Forestry Science and Technology, 2020, 46(5): 19-22. | |
| [5] | Leite R S, Barreto R W. Petal spotting of Hydrangea flowers caused by Corynespora cassiicola: old pathogen: new disease[J]. Mycologist, 2000, 14(2): 80-83. |
| [6] | Nagashima S, Tojo M. Hydrangea diseases in Japan[J]. Japan Agricultural Research Quarterly, 2023, 57(3): 183-194. |
| [7] | Hu Y F, Luo X X, Xu Z H, et al. First report of anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum siamense on Hydrangea macrophylla in China[J]. Plant Disease, 2023, 107(9): 2853. |
| [8] | Hamim I, Sipes B, Wang Y N. Detection, characterization, and management of plant pathogens[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2024, 15: 1354042. |
| [9] | 方中达. 植病研究方法[M]. 3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1998: 122-127. |
| [10] | Chung P C, Wu H Y, Wang Y W, et al. Diversity and pathogenicity of Colletotrichum species causing strawberry anthracnose in Taiwan and description of a new species, Colletotrichum miaoliense sp. nov.[J]. Scientific Reports, 2020, 10(1):14664. |
| [11] | de Silva D D, Groenewald J Z, Crous P W, et al. Identification, prevalence and pathogenicity of Colletotrichum species causing anthracnose of Capsicum annuum in Asia[J]. IMA Fungus, 2019, 10: 8. |
| [12] | 陈晶晶, 张玉, 温联好, 等. 绣球叶斑病的病原菌分离鉴定与防治研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2026, 38(1): 105-113. |
| Chen J J, Zhang Y, Wen L H, et al. Isolation, identification and control of the pathogen causing leaf spot disease on Hydrangea[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2026, 38(1): 105-113. | |
| [13] | 黄宇. 烟草Didymella segeticola病害病原学及叶际微生物多样性研究[D]. 贵阳: 贵州大学, 2021. |
| Huang Y. Pathogenesis of Didymella segeticola disease in Nicotiana tabacum and study on microbial diversity at leaf margins[D]. Guiyang: Guizhou University, 2021. | |
| [14] | 任纬恒. 高山杜鹃病害的病原菌分离鉴定与防治基础研究[D]. 贵阳: 贵州师范大学, 2019. |
| Ren W H. Fundamental research on pathogen isolation, identification, and control of diseases in Rhododendron lapponicum[D]. Guiyang: Guizhou Normal University, 2019. | |
| [15] | 孟珂. 薄壳山核桃黑斑病病原菌鉴定及室内药剂筛选[D]. 新乡: 河南科技学院, 2020. |
| Meng K. Pathogen identification of black spot disease in Carya illinoinensis and in vitro chemical screening[D]. Xinxiang: Henan Institute of Science and Technology, 2020. | |
| [16] | 王葆生, 张艳萍, 刘晓蕊, 等. 胡萝卜根腐病病原菌鉴定及品种抗病性评价[J]. 蔬菜, 2024(4): 54-58. |
| Wang B S, Zhang Y P, Liu X R, et al. Identification of the pathogen of root rot and evaluation of disease resistant varieties of carrot[J]. Vegetables, 2024(4): 54-58. | |
| [17] | 于海英, 兰建强, 刘林. 胶孢炭疽菌侵染芒果的过程及寄主的组织病理学研究[J]. 热带作物学报, 2022, 43(2): 361-368. |
| Yu H Y, Lan J Q, Liu L. Process of mango infected by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides and host histopathology[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2022, 43(2): 361-368. | |
| [18] | Talhinhas P, Baroncelli R. Hosts of Colletotrichum[J]. Mycosphere, 2023, 14: 158-261. |
| [19] | Chen J, Wang M, Han X, et al. First report of leaf blight caused by Colletotrichum karstii on banana shrub (Michelia figo) in Sichuan, China[J]. Plant Disease, 2023, 107(9): 2868. |
| [20] | Uysal A, Kurt Ş. First report of fruit and leaf anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum karstii on avocado in Turkey[J]. Crop Protection, 2020, 133: 105145. |
| [21] | Velho A C, Alaniz S, Casanova L, et al. New insights into the characterization of Colletotrichum species associated with apple diseases in southern Brazil and Uruguay[J]. Fungal Biology, 2015, 119(4): 229-244. |
| [22] | 冉飞, 陈佳, 莫飞旭, 等. 百香果炭疽病菌生物学特性及室内药剂筛选[J]. 热带作物学报, 2021, 42(4): 1080-1085. |
| Ran F, Chen J, Mo F X, et al. Biological characteristics of the pathogen and fungicides screening in laboratory for anthracnose of Passiflora edulia Sims[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2021, 42(4): 1080-1085. | |
| [23] | 江紫薇, 陈选鹏, 马恩耀, 等. 广东黑老虎炭疽病病原鉴定、生物学特性及其室内药剂毒力检测[J]. 西南农业学报, 2024, 37(7): 1504-1512. |
| Jiang Z W, Chen X P, Ma E Y, et al. Pathogen identification of Kadsura coccinea anthracnose and indoor toxicity measurement of fungicides[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 37(7): 1504-1512. | |
| [24] | 谢美华, 杨金奎, 李雪玲, 等. 紫果西番莲炭疽病病原菌鉴定及生物学特性研究[J]. 西南农业学报, 2017, 30(6): 1358-1363. |
| Xie M H, Yang J K, Li X L, et al. Study on identification and biological characteristics of anthracnose pathogen of Passiflora edulis[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 30(6): 1358-1363. | |
| [25] | 赵杰, 支月娥, 赵宝明, 等. 无花果炭疽病菌生物学特性及药剂的毒力测定[J]. 北方园艺, 2016(14): 126-129. |
| Zhao J, Zhi Y E, Zhao B M, et al. Biological characteristics of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides (Penz.) Sacc. and toxicities of fungicides[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2016(14): 126-129. | |
| [26] | Riolo M, Aloi F, Pane A, et al. Twig and shoot dieback of citrus, a new disease caused by Colletotrichum species[J]. Cells, 2021, 10(2): 449. |
| [27] | Mayorquin J S, Nouri M T, Peacock B B, et al. Identification, pathogenicity, and spore trapping of Colletotrichum karstii associated with twig and shoot dieback in California[J]. Plant Disease, 2019, 103(7): 1464-1473. |
| [1] | 蒋沅均, 付曼曼, 程凡, 吴超. 浙江省百合灰葡萄孢菌的生物学特性及防治药剂筛选[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2026, 38(7): 1388-1399. |
| [2] | 胡江龙, 姜万龙, 彭辉, 吴骏成, 张真, 汤近天, 张雅芬, 叶子弘. 茭白种质资源收集及不同茭白品种对茭白胡麻斑病的抗性评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2026, 38(5): 886-897. |
| [3] | 张玉, 陈晶晶, 温联好, 杨振翼, 杨曾华, 童译, 王超. 绣球博大蓝叶斑病病原菌的分离鉴定与防治[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2026, 38(4): 696-706. |
| [4] | 陈晶晶, 张玉, 温联好, 刘光炎, 周梅, 李正敏, 熊海燕, 杨振翼, 杨曾华, 童译, 王超. 绣球叶斑病的病原菌分离鉴定与防治研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2026, 38(1): 105-113. |
| [5] | 邓玉莲, 谭琳, 牛丽, 卢前程, 周玲红, 李桂花, 胡秋龙. 一株茶根腐病拮抗真菌的筛选鉴定与生物学特性研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(7): 1469-1480. |
| [6] | 沈国强, 汪明德, 关雅文, 武军, 王汉荣. 高粱弯孢叶斑病病原菌鉴定、生物学特性研究及防治药剂筛选[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(7): 1492-1500. |
| [7] | 王超, 李艳杰, 牛芸, 温联好, 陈晶晶, 吴红芝, 杨玉勇, 吴艳迪. 月季黑斑病病原菌的生物学特性与品种抗性评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(5): 1087-1096. |
| [8] | 杨志坚, 阮妙鸿, 林珊珊, 林世强, 廖素凤, 陈选阳. 紫心甘薯品种金薯20的选育与生长特性[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(11): 2249-2257. |
| [9] | 刘亚婷, 吴立东, 邱胤晖, 陈国钰, 钟柳青. 辣椒炭疽病病原菌分离鉴定及防治药剂筛选[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(11): 2315-2324. |
| [10] | 宋鹏, 李理想, 江厚龙, 王茹, 李慧, 赵鹏宇, 张均, 秦平伟, 任江波, 陈庆明. 施用侧孢短芽孢杆菌对烤后烟叶钾含量及烟株生理特征的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(3): 494-502. |
| [11] | 罗芷涵, 刘朋飞, 于军, 齐鹤, 陈小光, 楼兵干. 国槐枝枯病病原菌鉴定及其生物学特性[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(3): 579-588. |
| [12] | 王士臻, 黄俊, 李明江, 黄英杰, 张娟. 浙江省桂花叶斑病的病原鉴定及生物学特性等相关研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(12): 2763-2773. |
| [13] | 潘长漭, 王玉珊, 黄秋月, 何建清, 巴桑旺姆, 张格杰. 卷须猴头菌的鉴定及生物学特性研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(10): 2229-2237. |
| [14] | 潘攀, 张建华, 郑晓明, 周国民, 胡林, 冯全, 柴秀娟. 深度学习在作物及其近缘种抗病性智能鉴定上的研究进展[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(8): 1993-2012. |
| [15] | 冯连荣, 张妍, 赵鑫闻, 宋立志, 梁德军. 一株野生金针菇菌种的分离、鉴定与生物学特性研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(5): 1088-1096. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||