浙江农业学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (1): 89-97.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2022.01.11
杨超1(
), 刘敏竹1, 李强2, 韩涛2, 彭良志1, 凌丽俐1,*(
), 付行政1, 淳长品1, 曹立1, 何义仲1
收稿日期:2021-01-28
出版日期:2022-01-25
发布日期:2022-02-05
作者简介:* 凌丽俐,E-mail: linglili@cric.cn通讯作者:
凌丽俐
基金资助:
YANG Chao1(
), LIU Minzhu1, LI Qiang2, HAN Tao2, PENG Liangzhi1, LING Lili1,*(
), FU Xingzheng1, CHUN Changpin1, CAO Li1, HE Yizhong1
Received:2021-01-28
Online:2022-01-25
Published:2022-02-05
Contact:
LING Lili
摘要:
为阐明不同发光二极管(LED)光质对金秋砂糖橘生长发育和光合特性的影响,以金秋砂糖橘容器苗为试验材料,设置LED红光(R)、蓝光(B)、红蓝复合光(RB11、RB21、RB41、RB81)共6种光质处理,并以LED白光(W)为对照组。处理2个月后研究新梢茎叶形态、生物量、光合色素含量和光合特征参数变化,并对相关指标进行主成分分析。结果表明:红光显著促进新梢茎长、叶片数、叶面积和生物量,抑制茎粗和叶厚,而蓝光的作用与红光相反;低比例红光显著促进新梢茎长、茎粗、叶片数、叶面积和生物量,但随着红光比例的增加呈显著降低趋势,其中,RB11处理的茎长、茎粗、叶片数和叶面积分别是对照组的1.97倍(P<0.05)、1.14倍(P>0.05)、2.05倍(P<0.05)、1.84倍(P<0.05),新梢鲜重和干重,以及叶鲜重、茎鲜重、叶干重和茎干重分别是对照组的1.68倍(P<0.05)、1.88倍(P<0.05)、1.46倍(P>0.05)、3.00倍(P<0.05)、1.68倍(P<0.05)、3.06倍(P<0.05);红、蓝单色光均导致光合色素含量和净光合速率(net photosynthetic rate,Pn)显著降低,而红蓝复合光促进叶绿素b(chlb)、类胡萝卜素(car)含量和Pn的增加,并且随着红光比例的增加,叶绿素含量、car含量、chla/chlb、Pn呈显著降低趋势;红蓝单色光和复合光导致气孔导度(stomatal conductance, Gs)(除RB41处理外)和蒸腾速率(transpiration rate,Tr)(除RB21和RB41处理外)呈降低趋势。主成分分析结果显示,红蓝1:1复合光(RB11)更利于金秋砂糖橘新梢生长发育、物质积累和光合作用。综上,该研究为建立金秋砂糖橘苗木快速繁育的LED补光技术提供了理论依据。
中图分类号:
杨超, 刘敏竹, 李强, 韩涛, 彭良志, 凌丽俐, 付行政, 淳长品, 曹立, 何义仲. 发光二极管(LED)光质对金秋砂糖橘幼苗生长发育和光合特性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(1): 89-97.
YANG Chao, LIU Minzhu, LI Qiang, HAN Tao, PENG Liangzhi, LING Lili, FU Xingzheng, CHUN Changpin, CAO Li, HE Yizhong. Effects of different light-emitting diode (LED) light quality on growth, development and photosynthetic characteristics of Jinqiu Shatangju seedlings[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(1): 89-97.
| 处理 Treatment | 峰值 Peak value/nm | 峰宽 Peak width/nm |
|---|---|---|
| CK | 450,590 | 400-500,500-800 |
| B | 450 | 400-500 |
| R | 660 | 600-700 |
| RB11 | 450,660 | 400-500,580-800 |
| RB21 | 450,660 | 400-500,580-800 |
| RB41 | 450,660 | 400-500,580-800 |
| RB81 | 450,660 | 400-500,580-800 |
表1 不同LED光的峰值和峰宽
Table 1 Peak value and peak width of different LED lights
| 处理 Treatment | 峰值 Peak value/nm | 峰宽 Peak width/nm |
|---|---|---|
| CK | 450,590 | 400-500,500-800 |
| B | 450 | 400-500 |
| R | 660 | 600-700 |
| RB11 | 450,660 | 400-500,580-800 |
| RB21 | 450,660 | 400-500,580-800 |
| RB41 | 450,660 | 400-500,580-800 |
| RB81 | 450,660 | 400-500,580-800 |
| 处理 Treatment | 茎长 Stem length/cm | 茎粗 Stem diameter/cm | 叶片数 Leaf number | 叶厚 Leaf thick/cm | 叶面积 Leaf area/cm2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 11.93±3.30 b | 2.81±0.33 ab | 8.3±1.5 bc | 0.23±0.01 a | 11 698.8±2 620.0 c |
| B | 10.57±1.31 b | 2.87±0.47 ab | 6.3±1.2 c | 0.23±0.07 a | 8 050.3±990.7 d |
| R | 21.13±0.40 a | 2.64±0.46 ab | 14.3±0.6 a | 0.17±0.02 b | 23 782.6±1 807.5 a |
| RB11 | 23.53±2.66 a | 3.20±0.21 a | 17.0±2.0 a | 0.23±0.02 a | 21 571.1±4 189.5 ab |
| RB21 | 19.83±2.42 a | 3.00±0.14 ab | 10.3±2.5 b | 0.24±0.01 a | 16 457.8±4 684.4 bc |
| RB41 | 7.47±2.42 b | 2.23±0.10 b | 6.0±1.0 c | 0.23±0.01 a | 11 020.5±2 076.8 cd |
| RB81 | 6.97±1.67 b | 2.21±0.12 b | 5.3±1.2 c | 0.21±0.03 ab | 10 713.6±2 297.2 cd |
表2 金秋砂糖橘新梢的茎叶变化
Table 2 Changes in stem and leaf of new shoots of Jinqiu Shatangju
| 处理 Treatment | 茎长 Stem length/cm | 茎粗 Stem diameter/cm | 叶片数 Leaf number | 叶厚 Leaf thick/cm | 叶面积 Leaf area/cm2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 11.93±3.30 b | 2.81±0.33 ab | 8.3±1.5 bc | 0.23±0.01 a | 11 698.8±2 620.0 c |
| B | 10.57±1.31 b | 2.87±0.47 ab | 6.3±1.2 c | 0.23±0.07 a | 8 050.3±990.7 d |
| R | 21.13±0.40 a | 2.64±0.46 ab | 14.3±0.6 a | 0.17±0.02 b | 23 782.6±1 807.5 a |
| RB11 | 23.53±2.66 a | 3.20±0.21 a | 17.0±2.0 a | 0.23±0.02 a | 21 571.1±4 189.5 ab |
| RB21 | 19.83±2.42 a | 3.00±0.14 ab | 10.3±2.5 b | 0.24±0.01 a | 16 457.8±4 684.4 bc |
| RB41 | 7.47±2.42 b | 2.23±0.10 b | 6.0±1.0 c | 0.23±0.01 a | 11 020.5±2 076.8 cd |
| RB81 | 6.97±1.67 b | 2.21±0.12 b | 5.3±1.2 c | 0.21±0.03 ab | 10 713.6±2 297.2 cd |
| 处理 Treatment | 新梢鲜重 New shoot fresh mass/g | 新梢干重 New shoot dry mass/g | 干鲜重比 Ratio of dry mass to fresh mass | 叶鲜重 Leaf fresh mass/g | 茎鲜重 Stem fresh mass/g | 叶干重 Leaf dry mass/g | 茎干重 Stem dry mass/g |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 3.99±1.42 c | 1.12±0.43 c | 0.28±0.01 bc | 3.45±1.22 bc | 0.55±0.19 c | 0.96±0.37 b | 0.16±0.06 c |
| B | 3.70±0.43 c | 1.27±0.15 c | 0.34±0.01 a | 3.19±0.30 c | 0.51±0.14 c | 1.11±0.09 ab | 0.16±0.06 c |
| R | 7.53±1.43 a | 2.05±0.41 ab | 0.27±0.01 bc | 5.84±1.14 a | 1.69±0.33 a | 1.58±0.39 a | 0.47±0.02 a |
| RB11 | 6.69±0.82 ab | 2.10±0.40 a | 0.31±0.03 ab | 5.04±0.71 ab | 1.65±0.12 a | 1.61±0.40 a | 0.49±0.01 a |
| RB21 | 5.49±1.40 bc | 1.47±0.30 bc | 0.27±0.03 c | 4.43±1.29 abc | 1.06±0.11 b | 1.13±0.26 ab | 0.34±0.04 b |
| RB41 | 4.22±0.97 c | 1.36±0.33 c | 0.32±0.03 a | 3.75±0.75 bc | 0.47±0.24 c | 1.23±0.29 a | 0.13±0.06 c |
| RB81 | 3.72±1.14 c | 0.91±0.20 c | 0.25±0.03 c | 3.31±0.99 c | 0.40±0.16 c | 0.80±0.17 b | 0.11±0.03 c |
表3 金秋砂糖橘新梢的生物量变化
Table 3 Biomass changes of new shoots of Jinqiu Shatangju
| 处理 Treatment | 新梢鲜重 New shoot fresh mass/g | 新梢干重 New shoot dry mass/g | 干鲜重比 Ratio of dry mass to fresh mass | 叶鲜重 Leaf fresh mass/g | 茎鲜重 Stem fresh mass/g | 叶干重 Leaf dry mass/g | 茎干重 Stem dry mass/g |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 3.99±1.42 c | 1.12±0.43 c | 0.28±0.01 bc | 3.45±1.22 bc | 0.55±0.19 c | 0.96±0.37 b | 0.16±0.06 c |
| B | 3.70±0.43 c | 1.27±0.15 c | 0.34±0.01 a | 3.19±0.30 c | 0.51±0.14 c | 1.11±0.09 ab | 0.16±0.06 c |
| R | 7.53±1.43 a | 2.05±0.41 ab | 0.27±0.01 bc | 5.84±1.14 a | 1.69±0.33 a | 1.58±0.39 a | 0.47±0.02 a |
| RB11 | 6.69±0.82 ab | 2.10±0.40 a | 0.31±0.03 ab | 5.04±0.71 ab | 1.65±0.12 a | 1.61±0.40 a | 0.49±0.01 a |
| RB21 | 5.49±1.40 bc | 1.47±0.30 bc | 0.27±0.03 c | 4.43±1.29 abc | 1.06±0.11 b | 1.13±0.26 ab | 0.34±0.04 b |
| RB41 | 4.22±0.97 c | 1.36±0.33 c | 0.32±0.03 a | 3.75±0.75 bc | 0.47±0.24 c | 1.23±0.29 a | 0.13±0.06 c |
| RB81 | 3.72±1.14 c | 0.91±0.20 c | 0.25±0.03 c | 3.31±0.99 c | 0.40±0.16 c | 0.80±0.17 b | 0.11±0.03 c |
| 处理Treatment | chla/(mg·g-1) | chlb/(mg·g-1) | chl(a+b)/(mg·g-1) | chla/chlb | car/(mg·g-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 2.45±0.28 a | 0.70±0.07 ab | 3.15±0.34 a | 3.52±0.24 ab | 0.42±0.09 abc |
| B | 1.86±0.42 ab | 0.50±0.13 c | 2.36±0.54 b | 3.73±0.42 a | 0.35±0.09 c |
| R | 1.65±0.51 b | 0.47±0.12 c | 2.12±0.63 c | 3.49±0.28 ab | 0.36±0.12 bc |
| RB11 | 2.41±0.22 a | 0.80±0.09 a | 3.21±0.30 a | 3.01±0.17 c | 0.52±0.05 a |
| RB21 | 2.26±0.13 ab | 0.71±0.02ab | 2.97±0.14 ab | 3.20±0.16 bc | 0.51±0.04 ab |
| RB41 | 2.17±0.20 ab | 0.71±0.08 ab | 2.88±0.28 ab | 3.06±0.17 bc | 0.50±0.05 ab |
| RB81 | 1.72±0.41 b | 0.55±0.16 bc | 2.27±0.57 b | 3.17±0.25 bc | 0.39±0.08 abc |
表4 金秋砂糖橘新梢叶的叶绿素含量变化
Table 4 Changes of chlorophyll content of leaf on new shoots of Jinqiu Shatangju
| 处理Treatment | chla/(mg·g-1) | chlb/(mg·g-1) | chl(a+b)/(mg·g-1) | chla/chlb | car/(mg·g-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 2.45±0.28 a | 0.70±0.07 ab | 3.15±0.34 a | 3.52±0.24 ab | 0.42±0.09 abc |
| B | 1.86±0.42 ab | 0.50±0.13 c | 2.36±0.54 b | 3.73±0.42 a | 0.35±0.09 c |
| R | 1.65±0.51 b | 0.47±0.12 c | 2.12±0.63 c | 3.49±0.28 ab | 0.36±0.12 bc |
| RB11 | 2.41±0.22 a | 0.80±0.09 a | 3.21±0.30 a | 3.01±0.17 c | 0.52±0.05 a |
| RB21 | 2.26±0.13 ab | 0.71±0.02ab | 2.97±0.14 ab | 3.20±0.16 bc | 0.51±0.04 ab |
| RB41 | 2.17±0.20 ab | 0.71±0.08 ab | 2.88±0.28 ab | 3.06±0.17 bc | 0.50±0.05 ab |
| RB81 | 1.72±0.41 b | 0.55±0.16 bc | 2.27±0.57 b | 3.17±0.25 bc | 0.39±0.08 abc |
| 处理Treatment groups | Pn/(μmol·m-2·s-1) | Gs/(mmol·m-2·s-1) | Ci/(μmol·mol-1) | Tr/(μmol·m-2·s-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 2.20±0.48 c | 0.13±0.05 a | 354.1±20.6 ab | 2.89±1.00 a |
| B | 1.54±0.01 d | 0.11±0.02 ab | 363.3±7.1 a | 2.69±0.42 ab |
| R | 1.32±0.31 d | 0.06±0.03 c | 350.3±20.6 ab | 0.79±0.31 d |
| RB11 | 3.82±1.06 a | 0.09±0.05 bc | 301.5±29.4 c | 1.49±0.78 c |
| RB21 | 3.26±0.26 a | 0.12±0.04 ab | 349.9±12.6 b | 3.26±0.67 ab |
| RB41 | 2.84±0.90 b | 0.15±0.03 a | 353.5±17.4 ab | 3.02±0.40 a |
| RB81 | 2.86±0.54 b | 0.11±0.03 ab | 344.7±21.7 ab | 2.18±0.38 b |
表5 不同处理金秋砂糖橘新梢的光合特性
Table 5 Photosynthetic characteristic of new shoots of Jinqiu Shatangju under different treatments
| 处理Treatment groups | Pn/(μmol·m-2·s-1) | Gs/(mmol·m-2·s-1) | Ci/(μmol·mol-1) | Tr/(μmol·m-2·s-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 2.20±0.48 c | 0.13±0.05 a | 354.1±20.6 ab | 2.89±1.00 a |
| B | 1.54±0.01 d | 0.11±0.02 ab | 363.3±7.1 a | 2.69±0.42 ab |
| R | 1.32±0.31 d | 0.06±0.03 c | 350.3±20.6 ab | 0.79±0.31 d |
| RB11 | 3.82±1.06 a | 0.09±0.05 bc | 301.5±29.4 c | 1.49±0.78 c |
| RB21 | 3.26±0.26 a | 0.12±0.04 ab | 349.9±12.6 b | 3.26±0.67 ab |
| RB41 | 2.84±0.90 b | 0.15±0.03 a | 353.5±17.4 ab | 3.02±0.40 a |
| RB81 | 2.86±0.54 b | 0.11±0.03 ab | 344.7±21.7 ab | 2.18±0.38 b |
图2 不同LED光质处理组金秋砂糖橘幼苗的主成分分析 SL,茎长;SD,茎粗;LN,叶片数;LT,叶厚;LA,叶面积;NSFM,新梢鲜重;NSDM,新梢干重;Rdf,干鲜重比;LFM,叶鲜重;SFM,茎鲜重;LDM,叶干重;SDM,茎干重;chla,叶绿素a;chlb,叶绿素b;chl(a+b),叶绿素(a+b);Rab,chla/chlb;car,类胡萝卜素;Pn,净光合速率;Gs,气孔导度;Ci,胞间二氧化碳浓度;Tr,蒸腾速率。
Fig.2 Principal component analysis diagram of Jinqiu Shatangju seedlings under different light quality treatments SL, Stem length; SD, Stem diameter; LN, Leaf number; LT, Leaf thick; LA, Leaf area; NSFM, New shoot fresh mass; NSDM, New shoot d dry mass; Rdf, Ratio of dry mass to fresh mass; LFM, Leaves fresh mass; SFM, Stem fresh mass; LDM, Leaves dry mass; SDM, Stem dry mass; chla, Chlorophyll a; chlb, Chlorophyll b; chl (a+b), Chlorophyll (a+b); Rab, Ratio of chla to chlb; car, Car-carotenoid; Pn, Net photosynthetic rate; Gs, Stomatal conductance; Ci, Intercellular CO2 concentration; Tr, Transpiration rate.
| 处理Treatment | 成分Component | 综合得分Comprehensive score | 排序Ranking | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | -0.615 1 | 0.375 8 | 0.623 1 | -0.138 7 | 4 |
| B | -0.781 9 | -0.731 2 | 1.609 2 | -0.461 0 | 6 |
| R | 1.331 0 | -1.633 3 | -0.135 4 | 0.168 4 | 3 |
| RB11 | 1.450 2 | 1.138 9 | 0.072 2 | 1.075 1 | 1 |
| RB21 | 0.104 0 | 0.833 0 | -0.005 0 | 0.300 4 | 2 |
| RB41 | -0.650 8 | 0.585 3 | -0.508 8 | -0.199 6 | 5 |
| RB81 | -0.837 5 | -0.568 5 | -1.655 3 | -0.744 6 | 7 |
表6 各处理组的PCA总得分与排序
Table 6 PCA score and ranking of each treatment group
| 处理Treatment | 成分Component | 综合得分Comprehensive score | 排序Ranking | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | -0.615 1 | 0.375 8 | 0.623 1 | -0.138 7 | 4 |
| B | -0.781 9 | -0.731 2 | 1.609 2 | -0.461 0 | 6 |
| R | 1.331 0 | -1.633 3 | -0.135 4 | 0.168 4 | 3 |
| RB11 | 1.450 2 | 1.138 9 | 0.072 2 | 1.075 1 | 1 |
| RB21 | 0.104 0 | 0.833 0 | -0.005 0 | 0.300 4 | 2 |
| RB41 | -0.650 8 | 0.585 3 | -0.508 8 | -0.199 6 | 5 |
| RB81 | -0.837 5 | -0.568 5 | -1.655 3 | -0.744 6 | 7 |
| [1] | 钟广炎, 钟云, 闫化学, 等. 无病容器大苗在柑桔黄龙病综合防控中的应用价值[J]. 广东农业科学, 2016, 43(5): 92-95. |
| ZHONG G Y, ZHONG Y, YAN H X, et al. Application of very large nursery trees in control of citrus Huanglongbing[J]. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 43(5): 92-95.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [2] |
HAN T, VAGANOV V, CAO S X, et al. Improving “color rendering” of LED lighting for the growth of lettuce[J]. Scientific Reports, 2017, 7: 45944.
DOI URL |
| [3] | 刘振威, 孙丽, 方婷婷, 等. 不同光质及组合对番茄幼苗生长及生理特性的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2015, 30(5): 141-145. |
| LIU Z W, SUN L, FANG T T, et al. Effects of different light qualities on growth and physiological characteristics of tomato seedlings[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2015, 30(5): 141-145.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [4] |
METALLO R M, KOPSELL D A, SAMS C E, et al. Influence of blue/red vs. white LED light treatments on biomass, shoot morphology, and quality parameters of hydroponically grown kale[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2018, 235: 189-197.
DOI URL |
| [5] | 刘晓英, 焦学磊, 徐志刚, 等. 红蓝LED光对叶用莴苣生长、营养品质和硝态氮含量的影响[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2013, 36(5): 139-143. |
| LIU X Y, JIAO X L, XU Z G, et al. Effects of red and blue LED on growth, nutritional quality and nitrate nitrogen content of lettuce[J]. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University, 2013, 36(5): 139-143.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [6] |
HERNÁNDEZ R, KUBOTA C. Physiological responses of cucumber seedlings under different blue and red photon flux ratios using LEDs[J]. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2016, 121: 66-74.
DOI URL |
| [7] |
PENNISI G, BLASIOLI S, CELLINI A, et al. Unraveling the role of red: blue LED lights on resource use efficiency and nutritional properties of indoor grown sweet basil[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2019, 10: 305.
DOI URL |
| [8] |
PIOVENE C, ORSINI F, BOSI S, et al. Optimal red: blue ratio in led lighting for nutraceutical indoor horticulture[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2015, 193: 202-208.
DOI URL |
| [9] | 李思静, 易晓曈, 李有芳, 等. 不同LED光质对枳壳幼苗生长发育的影响[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2018, 38(3): 708-714. |
| LI S J, YI X T, LI Y F, et al. Effects of different LED light qualities on the growth of trifoliate orange seedlings[J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2018, 38(3): 708-714.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [10] | WELLBERUM A R, LICHTENTHOALER H. 1984. Formulae and program to determine total carotenoids and chlorophylls a and b of leaf extracts in different solvents[M]. Advances in Photosynbook Research. Springer Netherlands, 1984. |
| [11] |
METALLO R M, KOPSELL D A, SAMS C E, et al. Influence of blue/red vs. white LED light treatments on biomass, shoot morphology, and quality parameters of hydroponically grown kale[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2018, 235: 189-197
DOI URL |
| [12] | 史宏志, 韩锦峰, 远彤, 等. 红光和蓝光对烟叶生长、碳氮代谢和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 1999, 25(2): 215-220. |
| SHI H Z, HAN J F, YUAN T, et al. Effects of red and blue light proportion on leaf growth, carbon-nitrogen metabolism and quality in tobacco[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 1999, 25(2): 215-220.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [13] | 曹刚, 张国斌, 郁继华, 等. 不同光质LED光源对黄瓜苗期生长及叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46(6): 1297-1304. |
| CAO G, ZHANG G B, YU J H, et al. Effects of different LED light qualities on cucumber seedling growth and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2013, 46(6): 1297-1304.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [14] | 郭银生, 谷艾素, 崔瑾. 光质对水稻幼苗生长及生理特性的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2011, 22(6): 1485-1492. |
| GUO Y S, GU A S, CUI J. Effects of light quality on rice seedlings growth and physiological characteristics[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2011, 22(6): 1485-1492.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [15] | 陈玲. 花生幼苗生长对红蓝组合光的响应及其机理研究[D]. 青岛: 青岛农业大学, 2016. |
| CHEN L. Peanut seedling growth response and mechanism study of combination of red and blue light sources[D]. Qingdao: Qingdao Agricultural University, 2016. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [16] | 孙娜, 魏珉, 李岩, 等. 光质对番茄幼苗碳氮代谢及相关酶活性的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2016, 43(1): 80-88. |
| SUN N, WEI M, LI Y, et al. Effects of light quality on carbon and nitrogen metabolism and enzyme activities in tomato seedlings[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2016, 43(1): 80-88.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [17] |
BROWN C S, SCHUERGER A C, SAGER J C. Growth and photomorphogenesis of pepper plants under red light-emitting diodes with supplemental blue or far-red lighting[J]. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 1995, 120(5): 808-813.
DOI URL |
| [18] | 樊小雪, 宋波, 徐海, 等. LED光源对不结球白菜和番茄内源激素含量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2015, 27(11): 1927-1931. |
| FAN X X, SONG B, XU H, et al. Effects of light-emitting diodes on contents of endogenous hormones in non-heading Chinese cabbage and tomato[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2015, 27(11): 1927-1931.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [19] |
CHEN X L, GUO W Z, XUE X Z, et al. Growth and quality responses of ‘Green Oak Leaf’ lettuce as affected by monochromic or mixed radiation provided by fluorescent lamp (FL) and light-emitting diode (LED)[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2014, 172: 168-175.
DOI URL |
| [20] | MÉNARD C, DORAIS M, HOVI T, et al. Developmental and physiological responses of tomato and cucumber to additional blue light[J]. Acta Horticulturae, 2006(711): 291-296. |
| [21] | 刘晓英, 徐志刚, 常涛涛, 等. 不同光质LED弱光对樱桃番茄植株形态和光合性能的影响[J]. 西北植物学报, 2010, 30(4): 725-732. |
| LIU X Y, XU Z G, CHANG T T, et al. Growth and photosynjournal of cherry tomato seedling exposed to different low light of LED light quality[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2010, 30(4): 725-732.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [22] | 王丽伟, 李岩, 辛国凤, 等. 不同比例红蓝光对番茄幼苗生长和光合作用的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(5): 1595-1602. |
| WANG L W, LI Y, XIN G F, et al. Effects of different proportions of red and blue light on the growth and photosynjournal of tomato seedlings[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017, 28(5): 1595-1602.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [23] | 闫萌萌, 王铭伦, 王洪波, 等. 光质对花生幼苗叶片光合色素含量及光合特性的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2014, 25(2): 483-487. |
| YAN M M, WANG M L, WANG H B, et al. Effects of light quality on photosynthetic pigment contents and photosynthetic characteristics of peanut seedling leaves[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2014, 25(2): 483-487.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [24] | HE J, QIN L, CHONG E L C, et al. Plant growth and photosynthetic characteristics of Mesembryanthemum crystallinum grown aeroponically under different blue-and red-LEDs[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2017, 8: 361. |
| [25] | WANG J, LU W, TONG Y X, et al. Leaf morphology, photosynthetic performance, chlorophyll fluorescence, stomatal development of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) exposed to different ratios of red light to blue light[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2016, 7: 250. |
| [26] |
MUNEER S, KIM E, PARK J, et al. Influence of green, red and blue light emitting diodes on multiprotein complex proteins and photosynthetic activity under different light intensities in lettuce leaves (Lactuca sativa L.)[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2014, 15(3): 4657-4670.
DOI URL |
| [27] | 唐道彬, 张晓勇, 王季春, 等. 不同光质对水培脱毒马铃薯光合与结薯特性的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2017, 44(4): 691-702. |
| TANG D B, ZHANG X Y, WANG J C, et al. Effect of different LED light qualities on the photosynjournal and tuberization of virus-free potato in hydroponic culture[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2017, 44(4): 691-702.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [28] | 刘庆. 不同光周期及光质对草莓生理特性及品质的影响[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2015. |
| LIU Q. Effects of different photoperiod and different light quality on the physiological characteristic and quality in strawberry[D]. Tai’an: Shandong Agricultural University, 2015. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [29] | 闻婧, 杨其长, 魏灵玲, 等. 不同波峰的LED红蓝光质组合对黄瓜苗生长和光合特性的影响[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2013, 29(3): 619-625. |
| WEN J, YANG Q C, WEI L L, et al. Influence of red and blue light-emitting diodes(LEDs) lighting with different wave peaks on growth and photosynthetic characteristics of cucumber seedling[J]. Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 29(3): 619-625.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [30] | 邬奇, 苏娜娜, 崔瑾. LED光质补光对番茄幼苗生长及光合特性和抗氧化酶的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2013(21): 59-63. |
| WU Q, SU N N, CUI J. Effects of LED light quality on growth vitality, photosynthetic performance and antioxidant enzymatic activity of tomato seedlings[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2013(21): 59-63.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [31] |
MIYAGI A, UCHIMIYA H, KAWAI-YAMADA M. Synergistic effects of light quality, carbon dioxide and nutrients on metabolite compositions of head lettuce under artificial growth conditions mimicking a plant factory[J]. Food Chemistry, 2017, 218: 561-568.
DOI URL |
| [32] |
JUNG E S, LEE S, LIM S H, et al. Metabolite profiling of the short-term responses of rice leaves (Oryza sativa cv. Ilmi) cultivated under different LED lights and its correlations with antioxidant activities[J]. Plant Science, 2013, 210: 61-69.
DOI URL |
| [33] |
AMOOZGAR A, MOHAMMADI A, SABZALIAN M R. Impact of light-emitting diode irradiation on photosynjournal, phytochemical composition and mineral element content of lettuce cv. Grizzly[J]. Photosynthetica, 2017, 55(1): 85-95.
DOI URL |
| [34] |
KOPSELL D A, SAMS C E. Increases in shoot tissue pigments, glucosinolates, and mineral elements in sprouting broccoli after exposure to short-duration blue light from light emitting diodes[J]. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 2013, 138(1): 31-37.
DOI URL |
| [35] | CHANG S X, LI C X, YAO X Y, et al. Morphological, photosynthetic, and physiological responses of rapeseed leaf to different combinations of red and blue lights at the rosette stage[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2016, 7: 1144. |
| [1] | 贺世雄, 杨蕾, 齐安民, 程籍, 王敏, 李英奎, 洪林. 中间砧对3种杂柑叶片光合特性、理化指标和果实品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(8): 1680-1693. |
| [2] | 邹俊燕, 王筠竹, 赵婉秋, 尹志浩, 杜建科, 孙崇波. 兰科植物原球茎和类原球茎研究进展[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(6): 1372-1389. |
| [3] | 胡心柔, 王梅, 张雅芬, 蔡为明, 金群力. 非生物胁迫对灵芝生长发育及其响应机制的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(5): 1182-1190. |
| [4] | 李艳翠, 李福强, 周波. 不同生育期亏缺灌溉对蒙古黄芪光合特性、产量与品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(4): 779-789. |
| [5] | 秦宇坤, 陈俊英, 王玉萍, 张丽娟. 减氮增碳对长江流域棉花生产和氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(4): 869-879. |
| [6] | 李文杨, 刘洋, 李勇, 邱雯雯, 王辉. 光质和补光时间对南方红豆杉生长发育的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(10): 2077-2086. |
| [7] | 闵江艳, 唐卓磊, 杨雪, 黄小燕, 黄凯丰, 何佩云. 不同干旱-复水模式对苦荞生长与产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(9): 2000-2009. |
| [8] | 高国际, 龙玲, 宋晓云, 李彦彤, 刘高强, 丁功涛. 亮斑扁角水虻幼虫代替豆粕对北京鸭生长发育和血清生化指标的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(8): 1764-1772. |
| [9] | 赵黎明, 王亚新, 蒋文鑫, 段绍彪, 沈雪峰, 郑殿峰, 冯乃杰. 植物生长调节剂对优质粳稻产量、品质与光合特性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(5): 1003-1014. |
| [10] | 俞瑞鲜, 胡秀卿, 柳新菊, 汤涛, 吴珉, 吴声敢, 赵学平. 亚致死剂量氰戊菊酯对家蚕生长发育的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(2): 264-271. |
| [11] | 叶涛, 孙钦玉, 陈伟立, 单文书, 连文旭, 牛婷婷, 张家侠. 植物病原真菌bZIP基因家族研究进展[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(12): 2885-2894. |
| [12] | 廖雪环, 张坷塬, 阿尔力色, 周林, 杨尔倮, 邓俊, 张荣萍. 柯杈肥与功能肥复配对杂交稻生长与产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(11): 2447-2455. |
| [13] | 唐文静, 龚荣高, 初元琦, 陈超群, 陈红旭, 冉茂升, 张瑶, 杨文龙. 不同遮光率对甜樱桃果实品质和光合特性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(10): 2346-2353. |
| [14] | 尤翠翠, 贺一哲, 徐鹏, 黄亚茹, 王辉, 何海兵, 柯健, 武立权. 高温胁迫对水稻生长发育的伤害效应及其防御对策[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(1): 10-22. |
| [15] | 李春梅, 万小荣, 关子盈, 赖晓凤, 罗凯晴, 刘凯. 长链非编码RNA调控植物生长发育与逆境胁迫响应研究进展[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(9): 2066-2076. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||