Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis ›› 2023, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (6): 1396-1406.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2023.06.17
• Environmental Science • Previous Articles Next Articles
YANG Songhua(), SHI Guiyang, WANG Jingqin, CHEN Zhu*(
)
Received:
2021-08-10
Online:
2023-06-25
Published:
2023-07-04
CLC Number:
YANG Songhua, SHI Guiyang, WANG Jingqin, CHEN Zhu. Effects of soybean root exudates on insoluble phosphorus in soil under low phosphorus stress[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(6): 1396-1406.
有机酸 Organic acid | F值 F value | ||
---|---|---|---|
品种 Varieties | 磷水平 P level | 品种×磷水平 Varieties×P level | |
乙酸Acetic acid | 52.87** | 35.16** | 14.3** |
乳酸lactic acid | 25.32** | 26.82** | 21.26** |
延胡索酸Fumaric acid | 86.70** | 11.79** | 15.25** |
柠檬酸Citric acid | 48.06** | 0.23 | 45.50** |
琥珀酸Succinic acid | 29.54** | 114.86** | 27.77** |
苹果酸Malic acid | 117.60** | 21.60** | 156.12** |
草酸Oxalate | 105.60** | 0.01 | 22.06** |
酒石酸Tartaric acid | 509.29** | 0.78 | 184.96** |
总酸Total inorganic acid | 143.31** | 1.83** | 45.72** |
Table 1 Two factor analysis of organic acid content secreted by roots
有机酸 Organic acid | F值 F value | ||
---|---|---|---|
品种 Varieties | 磷水平 P level | 品种×磷水平 Varieties×P level | |
乙酸Acetic acid | 52.87** | 35.16** | 14.3** |
乳酸lactic acid | 25.32** | 26.82** | 21.26** |
延胡索酸Fumaric acid | 86.70** | 11.79** | 15.25** |
柠檬酸Citric acid | 48.06** | 0.23 | 45.50** |
琥珀酸Succinic acid | 29.54** | 114.86** | 27.77** |
苹果酸Malic acid | 117.60** | 21.60** | 156.12** |
草酸Oxalate | 105.60** | 0.01 | 22.06** |
酒石酸Tartaric acid | 509.29** | 0.78 | 184.96** |
总酸Total inorganic acid | 143.31** | 1.83** | 45.72** |
Fig.1 Difference of total organic acid secretion in different soybean genotypes under low phosphorus stress Different letters on the bars represent significant (P<0.05) differences among varieties under the same treatment, ns indicates that there is no significant difference in organic acid content under different phosphorus levels for the same variety, * indicates significant difference at 0.05 level, ** indicates very significant difference at 0.01 level. The error line is the standard deviation. Td, Tiedou 40; Cd, Chuandou 14; Qd11, Qiandou 11; Tf, Tiefeng 31; Dd, Dian 86-4; Ax, Aixuan; Jd23, Jindou 23; Jd12, Jidou 12; Fd, Fendou 62; Qd7, Qiandou 7. The same as below.
大豆品种 Soybean varieties | 磷水平 P level | 有机酸种类及分泌量Type and secretion of organic acids | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
乙酸 Acetic acid | 乳酸 lactic acid | 延胡索酸 Fumaric acid | 柠檬酸 Citric acid | 琥珀酸 Succinic acid | 苹果酸 Malic acid | 草酸 Oxalate | 酒石酸 Tartaric acid | ||
Td | LP | 0.109± 0.015 c | 0.236± 0.051 a | 0.139± 0.020 b | 0.125± 0.011 a | 2.165± 0.287 b | 0.361± 0.041 c | 9.293± 0.968 d | 0.178± 0.051 e |
NP | 0.051± 0.006 f | 0.143± 0.034 b | 0.097± 0.008 cd | 0.041± 0.010 cd | 1.027± 0.265 cd | 0.483± 0.069 b | 28.050± 8.041 a | 8.403± 1.525 b | |
Cd | LP | 0.078± 0.005 d | 0.119± 0.008 cd | 0.069± 0.007 e | 0.086± 0.003 b | 1.698± 0.274 c | 0.124± 0.031 f | 30.660± 3.342 a | 0.159± 0.017 e |
NP | 0.073± 0.013 de | 0.143± 0.027 b | 0.099± 0.011 cd | 0.104± 0.020 cd | 1.285± 0.212 bc | 0.976± 0.153 a | 25.850± 3.139 a | 7.042± 0.421 c | |
Qd11 | LP | 0.038± 0.010 e | 0.174± 0.037 b | 0.100± 0.010 c | 0.114± 0.014 a | 1.309± 0.204 de | 0.101± 0.003 fg | 15.930± 1.357 b | 0.118± 0.030 e |
NP | 0.064± 0.014 ef | 0.126± 0.028 bc | 0.089± 0.007 cd | 0.037± 0.002 d | 1.702± 0.213 a | 0.045± 0.006 e | 3.025± 0.469 b | 1.710± 0.443 f | |
Tf | LP | 0.032± 0.007 e | 0.103± 0.028 de | 0.084± 0.009 cde | 0.068± 0.010 c | 1.604 0± 0.302 cd | 0.082± 0.007 fg | 3.856± 0.651 e | 0.089± 0.003 e |
NP | 0.082± 0.008 cde | 0.110± 0.009 bc | 0.067± 0.008 ef | 0.053± 0.003 c | 1.459± 0.136 ab | 0.065± 0.006 de | 3.200± 0.493 b | 1.898± 0.358 f | |
Dd | LP | 0.100± 0.013 cd | 0.065± 0.005 ef | 0.083± 0.014 cde | 0.056± 0.017 c | 3.030± 0.217 a | 0.054± 0.003 g | 12.080± 0.459 c | 0.149± 0.042 e |
NP | 0.107± 0.009 c | 0.230± 0.007 a | 0.100± 0.008 c | 0.091± 0.002 c | 0.866± 0.088 def | 0.156± 0.010 cd | 5.156± 0.599 b | 4.781± 0.071 d | |
Ax | LP | 0.139± 0.027 b | 0.146± 0.004 bc | 0.089± 0.009 cd | 0.034± 0.006 de | 1.059± 0.085 e | 0.510± 0.019 b | 1.923± 0.308 ef | 12.410± 0.303 b |
NP | 0.179± 0.026 a | 0.204± 0.037 a | 0.085± 0.014 d | 0.035± 0.007 d | 0.729± 0.100 ef | 0.157± 0.022 cd | 2.374± 0.539 b | 2.127± 0.574 ef | |
Jd23 | LP | 0.025± 0.001 e | 0.036± 0.004 f | 0.080± 0.002 de | 0.023± 0.002 def | 1.060± 0.056 e | 0.295± 0.039 d | 1.464± 0.178 f | 19.906± 0.901 a |
NP | 0.140± 0.022 b | 0.209± 0.024 a | 0.069± 0.005 e | 0.036± 0.005 d | 1.002± 0.170 cde | 0.161± 0.011 cd | 2.800± 0.160 b | 15.880± 0.548 a | |
Jd12 | LP | 0.041± 0.003 e | 0.040± 0.006 f | 0.217± 0.007 a | 0.019± 0.003 ef | 1.680± 0.057 c | 0.231± 0.002 e | 1.448± 0.142 f | 12.234± 0.873 b |
NP | 0.096± 0.003 cd | 0.085± 0.012 c | 0.156± 0.007 a | 0.088± 0.006 ab | 0.757± 0.025 def | 0.191± 0.010 c | 3.327± 0.119 b | 4.922± 0.903 d | |
Fd | LP | 0.194± 0.038 a | 0.035± 0.002 f | 0.068± 0.002 e | 0.013± 0.001 f | 0.638± 0.009 f | 0.108± 0.019 fg | 1.255± 0.290 f | 5.796± 0.251 c |
NP | 0.920± 0.008 a | 0.043± 0.009 d | 0.054± 0.005 f | 0.036± 0.002 d | 0.628± 0.021 f | 0.065± 0.008 de | 1.905± 0.242 b | 1.241± 0.216 f | |
Qd7 | LP | 0.083± 0.007 cd | 0.120± 0.021 cd | 0.085± 0.007 cde | 0.037± 0.008 d | 1.276± 0.071 de | 1.047± 0.065 a | 1.732± 0.092 ef | 1.437± 0.165 d |
NP | 0.083± 0.012 cde | 0.090± 0.009 c | 0.118± 0.008 b | 0.043± 0.006 cd | 1.274± 0.126 bc | 0.088± 0.011 de | 3.497± 0.094 b | 3.195± 0.257 e |
Table 2 Amount of organic acids secreted by soybean roots under different phosphorus levels mg·h-1·g-1
大豆品种 Soybean varieties | 磷水平 P level | 有机酸种类及分泌量Type and secretion of organic acids | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
乙酸 Acetic acid | 乳酸 lactic acid | 延胡索酸 Fumaric acid | 柠檬酸 Citric acid | 琥珀酸 Succinic acid | 苹果酸 Malic acid | 草酸 Oxalate | 酒石酸 Tartaric acid | ||
Td | LP | 0.109± 0.015 c | 0.236± 0.051 a | 0.139± 0.020 b | 0.125± 0.011 a | 2.165± 0.287 b | 0.361± 0.041 c | 9.293± 0.968 d | 0.178± 0.051 e |
NP | 0.051± 0.006 f | 0.143± 0.034 b | 0.097± 0.008 cd | 0.041± 0.010 cd | 1.027± 0.265 cd | 0.483± 0.069 b | 28.050± 8.041 a | 8.403± 1.525 b | |
Cd | LP | 0.078± 0.005 d | 0.119± 0.008 cd | 0.069± 0.007 e | 0.086± 0.003 b | 1.698± 0.274 c | 0.124± 0.031 f | 30.660± 3.342 a | 0.159± 0.017 e |
NP | 0.073± 0.013 de | 0.143± 0.027 b | 0.099± 0.011 cd | 0.104± 0.020 cd | 1.285± 0.212 bc | 0.976± 0.153 a | 25.850± 3.139 a | 7.042± 0.421 c | |
Qd11 | LP | 0.038± 0.010 e | 0.174± 0.037 b | 0.100± 0.010 c | 0.114± 0.014 a | 1.309± 0.204 de | 0.101± 0.003 fg | 15.930± 1.357 b | 0.118± 0.030 e |
NP | 0.064± 0.014 ef | 0.126± 0.028 bc | 0.089± 0.007 cd | 0.037± 0.002 d | 1.702± 0.213 a | 0.045± 0.006 e | 3.025± 0.469 b | 1.710± 0.443 f | |
Tf | LP | 0.032± 0.007 e | 0.103± 0.028 de | 0.084± 0.009 cde | 0.068± 0.010 c | 1.604 0± 0.302 cd | 0.082± 0.007 fg | 3.856± 0.651 e | 0.089± 0.003 e |
NP | 0.082± 0.008 cde | 0.110± 0.009 bc | 0.067± 0.008 ef | 0.053± 0.003 c | 1.459± 0.136 ab | 0.065± 0.006 de | 3.200± 0.493 b | 1.898± 0.358 f | |
Dd | LP | 0.100± 0.013 cd | 0.065± 0.005 ef | 0.083± 0.014 cde | 0.056± 0.017 c | 3.030± 0.217 a | 0.054± 0.003 g | 12.080± 0.459 c | 0.149± 0.042 e |
NP | 0.107± 0.009 c | 0.230± 0.007 a | 0.100± 0.008 c | 0.091± 0.002 c | 0.866± 0.088 def | 0.156± 0.010 cd | 5.156± 0.599 b | 4.781± 0.071 d | |
Ax | LP | 0.139± 0.027 b | 0.146± 0.004 bc | 0.089± 0.009 cd | 0.034± 0.006 de | 1.059± 0.085 e | 0.510± 0.019 b | 1.923± 0.308 ef | 12.410± 0.303 b |
NP | 0.179± 0.026 a | 0.204± 0.037 a | 0.085± 0.014 d | 0.035± 0.007 d | 0.729± 0.100 ef | 0.157± 0.022 cd | 2.374± 0.539 b | 2.127± 0.574 ef | |
Jd23 | LP | 0.025± 0.001 e | 0.036± 0.004 f | 0.080± 0.002 de | 0.023± 0.002 def | 1.060± 0.056 e | 0.295± 0.039 d | 1.464± 0.178 f | 19.906± 0.901 a |
NP | 0.140± 0.022 b | 0.209± 0.024 a | 0.069± 0.005 e | 0.036± 0.005 d | 1.002± 0.170 cde | 0.161± 0.011 cd | 2.800± 0.160 b | 15.880± 0.548 a | |
Jd12 | LP | 0.041± 0.003 e | 0.040± 0.006 f | 0.217± 0.007 a | 0.019± 0.003 ef | 1.680± 0.057 c | 0.231± 0.002 e | 1.448± 0.142 f | 12.234± 0.873 b |
NP | 0.096± 0.003 cd | 0.085± 0.012 c | 0.156± 0.007 a | 0.088± 0.006 ab | 0.757± 0.025 def | 0.191± 0.010 c | 3.327± 0.119 b | 4.922± 0.903 d | |
Fd | LP | 0.194± 0.038 a | 0.035± 0.002 f | 0.068± 0.002 e | 0.013± 0.001 f | 0.638± 0.009 f | 0.108± 0.019 fg | 1.255± 0.290 f | 5.796± 0.251 c |
NP | 0.920± 0.008 a | 0.043± 0.009 d | 0.054± 0.005 f | 0.036± 0.002 d | 0.628± 0.021 f | 0.065± 0.008 de | 1.905± 0.242 b | 1.241± 0.216 f | |
Qd7 | LP | 0.083± 0.007 cd | 0.120± 0.021 cd | 0.085± 0.007 cde | 0.037± 0.008 d | 1.276± 0.071 de | 1.047± 0.065 a | 1.732± 0.092 ef | 1.437± 0.165 d |
NP | 0.083± 0.012 cde | 0.090± 0.009 c | 0.118± 0.008 b | 0.043± 0.006 cd | 1.274± 0.126 bc | 0.088± 0.011 de | 3.497± 0.094 b | 3.195± 0.257 e |
[1] | 刘海旭, 吴俊江, 王金生, 等. 大豆耐低磷研究进展[J]. 大豆科学, 2017, 36(4): 639-644. |
LIU H X, WU J J, WANG J S, et al. Progress of research on tolerance to low-phosphorus stress in soybean[J]. Soybean Science, 2017, 36(4): 639-644. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[2] | 任海红, 刘学义, 李贵全. 大豆耐低磷胁迫研究进展[J]. 分子植物育种, 2008, 6(2): 316-322. |
REN H H, LIU X Y, LI G Q. Advances of soybean tolerant to low phosphorus stress[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2008, 6(2): 316-322. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[3] | 张福锁. 环境胁迫与植物根际营养[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1998. |
[4] | GARDNER W K, BARBER D A, PARBERY D G. The acquisition of phosphorus by Lupinus albus L[J]. Plant and Soil, 1983, 70(1): 107-124. |
[5] | GARDNER W K, PARBERY D G, BARBER D A. The acquisition of phosphorus by Lupinus albus L[J]. Plant and Soil, 1982, 68(1): 33-41. |
[6] | AE N, ARIHARA J, OKADA K, et al. Phosphorus uptake by pigeon pea and its role in cropping systems of the Indian subcontinent[J]. Science, 1990, 248(4954): 477-480. |
[7] | SUBBARAO G V, AE N, OTANI T. Genetic variation in acquisition, and utilization of phosphorus from iron-bound phosphorus in pigeonpea[J]. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 1997, 43(3): 511-519. |
[8] | SHEN H, YAN X L, ZHAO M, et al. Exudation of organic acids in common bean as related to mobilization of aluminum-and iron-bound phosphates[J]. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2002, 48(1): 1-9. |
[9] | 赵明, 沈宏, 严小龙. 不同菜豆基因型根系对难溶性磷的活化吸收[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2002, 8(4): 435-440. |
ZHAO M, SHEN H, YAN X L. Mobilization and uptake of insoluble phosphorus by different common bean genotyes[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizing Science, 2002, 8(4): 435-440. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[10] | 兰忠明, 林新坚, 张伟光, 等. 缺磷对紫云英根系分泌物产生及难溶性磷活化的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(8): 1521-1531. |
LAN Z M, LIN X J, ZHANG W G, et al. Effect of P deficiency on the emergence of Astragalus L. root exudates and mobilization of sparingly soluble phosphorus[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(8): 1521-1531. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[11] | 陈佰岩, 郑毅, 汤利. 磷胁迫条件下小麦、蚕豆根系分泌物对红壤磷的活化[J]. 云南农业大学学报, 2009, 24(6): 869-875. |
CHEN B Y, ZHENG Y, TANG L. Mobilizing phosphorus in red soils by root exudates of wheat and broadbean under phosphorus stress condition[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University, 2009, 24(6): 869-875. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[12] | 杨利宁, 敖特根·白银, 李秋凤, 等. 苜蓿根系分泌物对土壤中难溶性磷的影响[J]. 草业科学, 2015, 32(8): 1216-1221. |
YANG L N, AOTEGEN·BAIYIN, LI Q F, et al. Effects of alfalfa root exudates on insoluble phosphorus in soil[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2015, 32(8): 1216-1221. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[13] | 王永壮, 陈欣, 史奕, 等. 低分子量有机酸对土壤磷活化及其机制研究进展[J]. 生态学杂志, 2018, 37(7): 2189-2198. |
WANG Y Z, CHEN X, SHI Y, et al. Review on the effects of low-molecular-weight organic acids on soil phosphorus activation and mechanisms[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2018, 37(7): 2189-2198. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[14] | 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000. |
[15] | 陆文龙, 曹一平, 张福锁. 根分泌的有机酸对土壤磷和微量元素的活化作用[J]. 应用生态学报, 1999, 10(3): 379-382. |
LU W L, CAO Y P, ZHANG F S. Role of root exuded organic acids in mobilization of soil phosphorus and micronutrients[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 1999, 10(3): 379-382. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[16] | 申建波, 张福锁, 毛达如. 磷胁迫下大豆根分泌有机酸的动态变化[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 1998, 3(S3): 44-48. |
SHEN J B, ZHANG F S, MAO D R. Dynamics of low-molecular-weight organic acids in root exudates of soybean under P-deficiency[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 1998, 3(S3): 44-48. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[17] | HINSINGER P. Bioavailability of soil inorganic P in the rhizosphere as affected by root-induced chemical changes: a review[J]. Plant and Soil, 2001, 237(2): 173-195. |
[18] | 张振海, 陈琰, 韩胜芳, 等. 低磷胁迫对大豆根系生长特性及分泌H+和有机酸的影响[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2011, 33(2): 135-140. |
ZHANG Z H, CHEN Y, HAN S F, et al. Effect of P deficiency stress on soybean root system and its secretion of H+ and organic acid[J]. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 2011, 33(2): 135-140. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[19] | 王美丽, 严小龙. 大豆根形态和根分泌物特性与磷效率[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2001, 22(3): 1-4. |
WANG M L, YAN X L. Characteristics on root morphology and root exudation of soybean in relation to phosphorus efficiency[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2001, 22(3): 1-4. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[20] | 田中民, 秦芳玲, 王波. 缺磷白羽扇豆根系分泌物收集方法的比较研究[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2003, 31(4): 154-158. |
TIAN Z M, QIN F L, WANG B. Comparative studies on methods of collecting root exudates from phosphorus deficient white lupin[J]. Journal of Northwest Sci-Tech University of Agriculture and Forestry, 2003, 31(4): 154-158. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[21] | 束良佐. 生长介质和局部供磷对白羽扇豆排根形成和柠檬酸分泌的影响[D]. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2005. |
SHU L Z. Effects of growth medium and localized phosphorus supply on cluster root formation and citrate exudation by Lupinus albus[D]. Beijing: China Agricultural University, 2005. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[22] | 秦丽凤. 不同木豆品种对低磷与铝毒胁迫的适应性反应及其机理研究[D]. 南宁: 广西大学, 2004. |
QIN L F. The adaptable responses of different cultivars of pigeon pea and corresponding mechanisms under P-deficiency stress and Al-toxicity stress[D]. Nanning: Guangxi University, 2004. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[23] | 张俊伶. 植物营养学[M]. 北京: 中国农业大学出版社, 2021. |
[24] | 李姣姣, 梁翠月, 廖红. 低磷胁迫对大豆苹果酸转运子GmALMT家族的表达调控[C]// 中国作物学会,中国细胞生物学学会,中国遗传学会,中国植物生理与分子生物学会,中国植物学会.2013全国植物生物学大会论文集, 2013. |
[25] | CANARINI A, KAISER C, MERCHANT A, et al. Root exudation of primary metabolites: mechanisms and their roles in plant responses to environmental stimuli[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2019, 10: 157. |
[26] | CHEN Z C, LIAO H. Organic acid anions: an effective defensive weapon for plants against aluminum toxicity and phosphorus deficiency in acidic soils[J]. Journal of Genetics and Genomics, 2016, 43(11): 631-638. |
[27] | 章爱群, 贺立源, 赵会娥, 等. 有机酸对不同磷源条件下土壤无机磷形态的影响[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2009, 15(4): 474-478. |
ZHANG A Q, HE L Y, ZHAO H E, et al. Effect of organic acids on inorganic phosphorus transformation in soil with different phosphorus sources[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology, 2009, 15(4): 474-478. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[28] | 胡红青, 廖丽霞, 王兴林. 低分子量有机酸对红壤无机态磷转化及酸度的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2002, 13(7): 867-870. |
HU H Q, LIAO L X, WANG X L. Effect of low molecular weight organic acids on inorganic phosphorus transformation in red soil and its acidity[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2002, 13(7): 867-870. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[29] | 王树起, 韩晓增, 严君, 等. 低分子量有机酸对大豆磷积累和土壤无机磷形态转化的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2009, 28(8): 1550-1554. |
WANG S Q, HAN X Z, YAN J, et al. Effects of low molecular weight organic acids on P accumulation in soybean(Glycine max L.) and inorganic P form transformation in soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2009, 28(8): 1550-1554. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[30] | 龚松贵, 王兴祥, 张桃林, 等. 低分子量有机酸对红壤无机磷活化的作用[J]. 土壤学报, 2010, 47(4): 692-697. |
GONG S G, WANG X X, ZHANG T L, et al. Release of inorganic phosphorus from red soils induced by low molecular weight organic acids[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2010, 47(4): 692-697. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[31] | 余文煜. 低分子有机酸、盐对南方红壤森林土壤磷的释放规律研究[D]. 福州: 福建农林大学, 2010. |
YU W Y. Study on the effect of low-molecular-weight organic acids/salt on phosphorus release of southern forest red soil[D]. Fuzhou: Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 2010. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[32] | STROM L, OWEN A G, GODBOLD D L, et al. Organic acid mediated P mobilization in the rhizosphere and uptake by maize roots[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2002, 34(5):703-710. |
[33] | 刘慧, 栗杰, 贺云龙, 等. 外源低分子量有机酸对土壤钙、磷释放动力学特性的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2016(23): 163-167. |
LIU H, LI J, HE Y L, et al. Effect of exogenous low molecular weight organic acids on soil calcium, phosphorus release kinetics characteristics[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2016(23): 163-167. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | BU Yuanpeng, LIU Na, ZHANG Guwen, FENG Zhijuan, WANG Bin, GONG Yaming, XU Linying. Diversity evaluation of agronomic traits and construction of core collection and taste quality evaluation system in vegetable soybean germplasm resources [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(6): 1307-1314. |
[2] | TAN Shuxia, ZHAO Taodi, YANG Hao, NING Kejun, LIU Li, HE Qingyuan, HUANG Shoucheng, SHU Yingjie. Effects of shading on agronomic characters, yield and nitrogen metabolism of 10 vegetable soybean varieties [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(4): 729-735. |
[3] | WU Jiao, GONG Chengyu, CHEN Chaoqun, CHEN Hongxu, LIU Junhong, TANG Wenjing, CHU Yuanqi, YANG Wenlong, ZHANG Yao, GONG Ronggao. Ecological response of organic acid metabolism of Huangguogan fruits at different altitudes [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(4): 853-861. |
[4] | ZHANG Meng, SHE Bao, YANG Yuying, HUANG Linsheng, ZHU Mengqi. Study on extraction method of soybean planting areas based on unmanned aerial vehicle RGB image [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(4): 952-961. |
[5] | ZHAO Shuhui, ZHANG Zhenhua, OU Zhangdan, TIAN Maoping, CHEN Yumei, ZHAO Ziwei. Preliminary analysis on research hotspot of crop root exudates in China [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(3): 534-546. |
[6] | LI Wenchen, LIU Xin, QI Zezheng, YU Lu, WANG Fang. Bioinformatics of Huipizhi Black soybean GmPUB24 and expression under Heterodera glycines infection [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(6): 1124-1132. |
[7] | YANG Xinxia, TANG Mansheng, ZHANG Bin. Identification of soybean PP2C family genes and transcriptome analysis in response to salt stress [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(2): 207-220. |
[8] | LIU Na, FAN Qiaochu, ZHOU Jia, SONG Yajing, ZHANG Guwen, FENG Zhijuan, BO Yuanpeng, WANG Bin, GONG Yaming. Identification and control of anthracnose in vegetable soybean [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(12): 2682-2688. |
[9] | HE Xiu, XU Meiyu, XIN Weigang, ZHANG Qilin, WANG Feng, LIN Lianbing. Effects of soybean meal addition and fermentation time on nutritional quality and bacterial diversity of Pennisetum purpureum silage [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(10): 2160-2171. |
[10] | YANG Xinxia, ZHANG Bin. Identification of soybean LAZ1 gene family and functional analysis of GmLAZ1-9 [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(4): 586-594. |
[11] | ZHANG Weimei, ZHANG Guwen, FENG Zhijuan, LIU Na, WANG Bin, BU Yuanpeng. Research progress on genetic and regulatory mechanisms of sucrose in vegetable soybean seeds [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(12): 2446-2456. |
[12] | YANG Ju, DENG Junliang, XIA Jiangying, SONG Tianhao, PANG Lianfeng, REN Zhihua. Effect of vitamin A on barrier function damage of piglet intestinal epithelial cells induced by soybean 7S globulin [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(11): 2026-2033. |
[13] | XU Yue, XU Yaxin, HUANG Xingjun, WU Shu, CHEN Guodong, WU Quanzhong, ZHAI Yunlong. Effects of inoculation method of rhizobia on dry matter accumulation and yield of multiple soybean [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(10): 1808-1816. |
[14] | HE Jiaqi, ZHAI Ying, ZHANG Jun, QIU Shuang, LI Mingyang, ZHAO Yan, ZHANG Meijuan, MA Tianyi. Cloning and expression analysis of GmDof1.5 in soybean under abiotic stress [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(1): 1-7. |
[15] | YANG Yiwei, XIAO Hua, CHEN Hu, XIAO Niejia, GUO Cheng. Structural characteristics of soil mite communities under different modes of rose-based agroforestry in Karst area [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(1): 112-121. |
Viewed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full text 494
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract 318
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||