Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis ›› 2026, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (3): 559-567.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20250184
• Environmental Science • Previous Articles Next Articles
TANG Ning’an(
), HU Mengxi, FAN Min, FANG Jianfeng, FU Li, JIANG Yujie, JIANG Mingbei(
)
Received:2025-03-10
Online:2026-03-25
Published:2026-04-17
Contact:
JIANG Mingbei
CLC Number:
TANG Ning’an, HU Mengxi, FAN Min, FANG Jianfeng, FU Li, JIANG Yujie, JIANG Mingbei. Ecological stoichiometric characteristics of soil carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus in the western region of Hangzhou City, China[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2026, 38(3): 559-567.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.zjnyxb.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20250184
| 土地利用方式 Land use pattern | 海拔/m Altitude/m | ωOC/(g·kg-1) | ωTN/(g·kg-1) | ωTP/(g·kg-1) | C/N | C/P | N/P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 林地 Forest land | 50~250 | 26.39±1.70 d | 1.94±0.14 c | 0.45±0.03 b | 13.59±0.60 b | 58.73±6.21 c | 4.33±0.51 ab |
| >250~500 | 26.23±2.74 d | 1.92±0.14 c | 0.44±0.05 b | 13.61±0.59 b | 60.22±11.77 bc | 4.40±0.70 ab | |
| >500~750 | 30.80±3.04 c | 2.14±0.11 bc | 0.48±0.06 b | 14.36±0.80 b | 65.60±12.77 bc | 4.53±0.66 ab | |
| >750~1 000 | 31.35±2.00 c | 2.20±0.20 b | 0.57±0.06 ab | 14.28±0.70 b | 56.07±7.25 c | 3.92±0.41 b | |
| >1 000~1 250 | 40.88±3.74 b | 2.83±0.18 a | 0.59±0.04 ab | 14.45±0.62 b | 69.90±6.03 b | 4.84±0.44 a | |
| >1 250~1 500 | 48.36±4.38 a | 2.94±0.30 a | 0.63±0.05 a | 16.50±0.85 a | 77.31±4.01 a | 4.70±0.35 a | |
| 茶园 Tea garden | >50~250 | 14.37±1.98 d | 1.28±0.17 c | 0.89±0.12 a | 11.20±0.80 b | 16.53±3.45 d | 1.47±0.26 d |
| >250~500 | 17.53±1.06 c | 1.56±0.07 b | 0.81±0.06 a | 11.28±0.73 b | 21.62±1.11 c | 1.93±0.17 c | |
| >500~750 | 20.92±2.39 b | 1.68±0.26 ab | 0.62±0.05 b | 12.55±0.69 a | 33.54±1.47 b | 2.68±0.23 b | |
| >750~1 000 | 26.13±1.90 a | 1.95±0.23 a | 0.65±0.05 b | 13.48±0.65 a | 40.39±4.16 a | 3.01±0.45 a | |
| 旱地 Upland | 50~250 | 12.48±1.28 c | 1.27±0.10 b | 0.65±0.10 ab | 9.84±0.45 c | 19.94±4.92 c | 2.01±0.42 bc |
| >250~500 | 14.38±0.86 c | 1.38±0.10 b | 0.73±0.05 a | 10.43±0.34 c | 19.93±2.11 c | 1.92±0.24 c | |
| >500~750 | 17.17±0.96 b | 1.54±0.05 a | 0.63±0.04 bc | 11.12±0.64 b | 27.56±2.56 b | 2.48±0.22 ab | |
| >750~1 000 | 21.08±1.77 a | 1.67±0.24 a | 0.60±0.03 c | 12.69±0.73 a | 35.00±3.51 a | 2.78±0.40 a |
Table 1 Variations of soil carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus stoichiometric characteristics with altitude
| 土地利用方式 Land use pattern | 海拔/m Altitude/m | ωOC/(g·kg-1) | ωTN/(g·kg-1) | ωTP/(g·kg-1) | C/N | C/P | N/P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 林地 Forest land | 50~250 | 26.39±1.70 d | 1.94±0.14 c | 0.45±0.03 b | 13.59±0.60 b | 58.73±6.21 c | 4.33±0.51 ab |
| >250~500 | 26.23±2.74 d | 1.92±0.14 c | 0.44±0.05 b | 13.61±0.59 b | 60.22±11.77 bc | 4.40±0.70 ab | |
| >500~750 | 30.80±3.04 c | 2.14±0.11 bc | 0.48±0.06 b | 14.36±0.80 b | 65.60±12.77 bc | 4.53±0.66 ab | |
| >750~1 000 | 31.35±2.00 c | 2.20±0.20 b | 0.57±0.06 ab | 14.28±0.70 b | 56.07±7.25 c | 3.92±0.41 b | |
| >1 000~1 250 | 40.88±3.74 b | 2.83±0.18 a | 0.59±0.04 ab | 14.45±0.62 b | 69.90±6.03 b | 4.84±0.44 a | |
| >1 250~1 500 | 48.36±4.38 a | 2.94±0.30 a | 0.63±0.05 a | 16.50±0.85 a | 77.31±4.01 a | 4.70±0.35 a | |
| 茶园 Tea garden | >50~250 | 14.37±1.98 d | 1.28±0.17 c | 0.89±0.12 a | 11.20±0.80 b | 16.53±3.45 d | 1.47±0.26 d |
| >250~500 | 17.53±1.06 c | 1.56±0.07 b | 0.81±0.06 a | 11.28±0.73 b | 21.62±1.11 c | 1.93±0.17 c | |
| >500~750 | 20.92±2.39 b | 1.68±0.26 ab | 0.62±0.05 b | 12.55±0.69 a | 33.54±1.47 b | 2.68±0.23 b | |
| >750~1 000 | 26.13±1.90 a | 1.95±0.23 a | 0.65±0.05 b | 13.48±0.65 a | 40.39±4.16 a | 3.01±0.45 a | |
| 旱地 Upland | 50~250 | 12.48±1.28 c | 1.27±0.10 b | 0.65±0.10 ab | 9.84±0.45 c | 19.94±4.92 c | 2.01±0.42 bc |
| >250~500 | 14.38±0.86 c | 1.38±0.10 b | 0.73±0.05 a | 10.43±0.34 c | 19.93±2.11 c | 1.92±0.24 c | |
| >500~750 | 17.17±0.96 b | 1.54±0.05 a | 0.63±0.04 bc | 11.12±0.64 b | 27.56±2.56 b | 2.48±0.22 ab | |
| >750~1 000 | 21.08±1.77 a | 1.67±0.24 a | 0.60±0.03 c | 12.69±0.73 a | 35.00±3.51 a | 2.78±0.40 a |
| 海拔/m Altitude/m | 土地利用方式 Land use pattern | ωOC/(g·kg-1) | ωTN/(g·kg-1) | ωTP/(g·kg-1) | C/N | C/P | N/P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50~250 | 林地Forest land | 26.39±1.70 a | 1.94±0.14 a | 0.45±0.03 c | 13.59±0.60 a | 58.73±6.21 a | 4.33±0.51 a |
| 茶园Tea garden | 14.37±1.98 b | 1.28±0.17 b | 0.89±0.12 a | 11.20±0.80 b | 16.53±3.45 b | 1.47±0.26 c | |
| 旱地Upland | 12.48±1.28 b | 1.27±0.10 b | 0.65±0.10 b | 9.84±0.45 c | 19.94±4.92 b | 2.01±0.42 b | |
| >250~500 | 林地Forest land | 26.23±2.74 a | 1.92±0.14 a | 0.44±0.05 b | 13.61±0.59 a | 60.22±11.77 a | 4.40±0.70 a |
| 茶园Tea garden | 17.53±1.06 b | 1.56±0.07 b | 0.81±0.06 a | 11.28±0.73 b | 21.62±1.11 b | 1.93±0.17 b | |
| 旱地Upland | 14.38±0.86 c | 1.38±0.10 c | 0.73±0.05 a | 10.43±0.34 c | 19.93±2.11 b | 1.92±0.24 b | |
| >500~750 | 林地Forest land | 30.80±3.04 a | 2.14±0.11 a | 0.48±0.06 b | 14.36±0.80 a | 65.60±12.77 a | 4.53±0.66 a |
| 茶园Tea garden | 20.92±2.39 b | 1.68±0.26 b | 0.62±0.05 a | 12.55±0.69 b | 33.54±1.47 b | 2.68±0.23 b | |
| 旱地Upland | 17.17±0.96 c | 1.54±0.05 b | 0.63±0.04 a | 11.12±0.64 c | 27.56±2.56 c | 2.48±0.22 b | |
| >750~1 000 | 林地Forest land | 31.35±2.00 a | 2.20±0.20 a | 0.57±0.06 b | 14.28±0.70 a | 56.07±7.25 a | 3.92±0.41 a |
| 茶园Tea garden | 26.13±1.90 b | 1.95±0.23 b | 0.65±0.05 a | 13.48±0.65 ab | 40.39±4.16 b | 3.01±0.45 b | |
| 旱地Upland | 21.08±1.77 c | 1.67±0.24 b | 0.60±0.03 ab | 12.69±0.73 b | 35.00±3.51 b | 2.78±0.40 b |
Table 2 Stoichiometric characteristics of soil carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus under different land use patterns in hilly and mountainous areas
| 海拔/m Altitude/m | 土地利用方式 Land use pattern | ωOC/(g·kg-1) | ωTN/(g·kg-1) | ωTP/(g·kg-1) | C/N | C/P | N/P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50~250 | 林地Forest land | 26.39±1.70 a | 1.94±0.14 a | 0.45±0.03 c | 13.59±0.60 a | 58.73±6.21 a | 4.33±0.51 a |
| 茶园Tea garden | 14.37±1.98 b | 1.28±0.17 b | 0.89±0.12 a | 11.20±0.80 b | 16.53±3.45 b | 1.47±0.26 c | |
| 旱地Upland | 12.48±1.28 b | 1.27±0.10 b | 0.65±0.10 b | 9.84±0.45 c | 19.94±4.92 b | 2.01±0.42 b | |
| >250~500 | 林地Forest land | 26.23±2.74 a | 1.92±0.14 a | 0.44±0.05 b | 13.61±0.59 a | 60.22±11.77 a | 4.40±0.70 a |
| 茶园Tea garden | 17.53±1.06 b | 1.56±0.07 b | 0.81±0.06 a | 11.28±0.73 b | 21.62±1.11 b | 1.93±0.17 b | |
| 旱地Upland | 14.38±0.86 c | 1.38±0.10 c | 0.73±0.05 a | 10.43±0.34 c | 19.93±2.11 b | 1.92±0.24 b | |
| >500~750 | 林地Forest land | 30.80±3.04 a | 2.14±0.11 a | 0.48±0.06 b | 14.36±0.80 a | 65.60±12.77 a | 4.53±0.66 a |
| 茶园Tea garden | 20.92±2.39 b | 1.68±0.26 b | 0.62±0.05 a | 12.55±0.69 b | 33.54±1.47 b | 2.68±0.23 b | |
| 旱地Upland | 17.17±0.96 c | 1.54±0.05 b | 0.63±0.04 a | 11.12±0.64 c | 27.56±2.56 c | 2.48±0.22 b | |
| >750~1 000 | 林地Forest land | 31.35±2.00 a | 2.20±0.20 a | 0.57±0.06 b | 14.28±0.70 a | 56.07±7.25 a | 3.92±0.41 a |
| 茶园Tea garden | 26.13±1.90 b | 1.95±0.23 b | 0.65±0.05 a | 13.48±0.65 ab | 40.39±4.16 b | 3.01±0.45 b | |
| 旱地Upland | 21.08±1.77 c | 1.67±0.24 b | 0.60±0.03 ab | 12.69±0.73 b | 35.00±3.51 b | 2.78±0.40 b |
| 亚类 Subgroup | ωOC/(g·kg-1) | ωTN/(g·kg-1) | ωTP/(g·kg-1) | C/N | C/P | N/P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 渗育Percolating | 17.10±1.34 c | 1.87±0.14 b | 0.58±0.07 a | 9.15±0.64 b | 29.79±2.01 c | 3.29±0.42 b |
| 潴育Hydromorphic | 20.08±1.52 b | 2.23±0.10 a | 0.53±0.07 a | 9.02±0.68 b | 38.40±5.29 b | 4.25±0.40 a |
| 潜育Gleying | 27.05±1.98 a | 2.23±0.20 a | 0.57±0.08 a | 12.18±0.94 a | 48.16±8.11 a | 3.99±0.79 ab |
Table 3 Stoichiometric characteristics of soil carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus of different subgroups of paddy soil
| 亚类 Subgroup | ωOC/(g·kg-1) | ωTN/(g·kg-1) | ωTP/(g·kg-1) | C/N | C/P | N/P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 渗育Percolating | 17.10±1.34 c | 1.87±0.14 b | 0.58±0.07 a | 9.15±0.64 b | 29.79±2.01 c | 3.29±0.42 b |
| 潴育Hydromorphic | 20.08±1.52 b | 2.23±0.10 a | 0.53±0.07 a | 9.02±0.68 b | 38.40±5.29 b | 4.25±0.40 a |
| 潜育Gleying | 27.05±1.98 a | 2.23±0.20 a | 0.57±0.08 a | 12.18±0.94 a | 48.16±8.11 a | 3.99±0.79 ab |
| 土地利用方式 Land use pattern | ωOC/(g·kg-1) | ωTN/(g·kg-1) | ωTP/(g·kg-1) | C/N | C/P | N/P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 水田Paddy field | 21.41±4.64 a | 2.11±0.24 a | 0.56±0.08 c | 10.12±1.71 ab | 38.79±9.76 a | 3.84±0.72 a |
| 蔬菜地Vegetable field | 14.15±0.94 b | 1.55±0.22 b | 1.11±0.21 a | 9.23±0.74 b | 13.27±2.80 c | 1.47±0.41 b |
| 果园Orchard | 14.43±0.77 b | 1.35±0.14 b | 0.84±0.07 b | 10.74±0.68 a | 17.31±1.86 b | 1.62±0.24 b |
Table 4 Stoichiometric characteristics of soil carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus in valley plains under different land use patterns
| 土地利用方式 Land use pattern | ωOC/(g·kg-1) | ωTN/(g·kg-1) | ωTP/(g·kg-1) | C/N | C/P | N/P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 水田Paddy field | 21.41±4.64 a | 2.11±0.24 a | 0.56±0.08 c | 10.12±1.71 ab | 38.79±9.76 a | 3.84±0.72 a |
| 蔬菜地Vegetable field | 14.15±0.94 b | 1.55±0.22 b | 1.11±0.21 a | 9.23±0.74 b | 13.27±2.80 c | 1.47±0.41 b |
| 果园Orchard | 14.43±0.77 b | 1.35±0.14 b | 0.84±0.07 b | 10.74±0.68 a | 17.31±1.86 b | 1.62±0.24 b |
| 地貌Landform | ωOC/(g·kg-1) | ωTN/(g·kg-1) | ωTP/(g·kg-1) | C/N | C/P | N/P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 丘陵山地 Hilly-mountainous regions | 24.86±10.37 a | 1.88±0.53 a | 0.62±0.14 a | 12.81±1.93 a | 43.02±21.32 a | 3.21±1.24 a |
| 河谷平原Valley plains | 18.56±5.05 a | 1.85±0.40 a | 0.73±0.25 a | 10.06±1.47 b | 29.39±14.06 b | 2.92±1.29 a |
Table 5 Stoichiometric characteristics of soil carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus in different geomorphic regions
| 地貌Landform | ωOC/(g·kg-1) | ωTN/(g·kg-1) | ωTP/(g·kg-1) | C/N | C/P | N/P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 丘陵山地 Hilly-mountainous regions | 24.86±10.37 a | 1.88±0.53 a | 0.62±0.14 a | 12.81±1.93 a | 43.02±21.32 a | 3.21±1.24 a |
| 河谷平原Valley plains | 18.56±5.05 a | 1.85±0.40 a | 0.73±0.25 a | 10.06±1.47 b | 29.39±14.06 b | 2.92±1.29 a |
| [1] | 章明奎. 土壤地理学与土壤调查技术[M]. 北京: 中国农业科学技术出版社, 2011. |
| [2] | 毛晋花, 邢亚娟, 王庆贵. 外源碳氮对植物生态化学计量特征的影响研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2018, 34(5): 54-60. |
| MAO J H, XING Y J, WANG Q G. Exogenous carbon and nitrogen: effects on plant ecological stoichiometry characteristics[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2018, 34(5): 54-60. | |
| [3] | ELSER J J, STERNER R W, GOROKHOVA E, et al. Biological stoichiometry from genes to ecosystems[J]. Ecology Letters, 2000, 3(6): 540-550. |
| [4] | 刘超, 王洋, 王楠, 等. 陆地生态系统植被氮磷化学计量研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 2012, 36(11): 1205-1216. |
| LIU C, WANG Y, WANG N, et al. Advances research in plant nitrogen, phosphorus and their stoichiometry in terrestrial ecosystems: a review[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2012, 36(11): 1205-1216. | |
| [5] | 邬畏, 何兴东, 周启星. 生态系统氮磷比化学计量特征研究进展[J]. 中国沙漠, 2010, 30(2): 296-302. |
| WU W, HE X D, ZHOU Q X. Review on N: P stoichiometry in eco-system[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2010, 30(2): 296-302. | |
| [6] | 何锡文, 郭薇. 化学计量:取样学最近的进展[J]. 分析化学, 1995, 23(12): 1455-1461. |
| HE X W, GUO W. The recent development of chemometrics: sampling[J]. Chinese Journal of Analytieal Chemistry, 1995, 23(12): 1455-1461. | |
| [7] | 巢林, 曾鑫, 欧梦菲, 等. 喀斯特山区不同土地利用方式对土壤微生物生物量、酶活性及其化学计量的影响[J]. 山地学报, 2023, 41(1): 28-40. |
| CHAO L, ZENG X, OU M F, et al. Effects of different land use patterns on soil microbial biomass, enzyme activity and stoichiometry in the mountainous karst areas of China[J]. Mountain Research, 2023, 41(1): 28-40. | |
| [8] | 张志山, 杨贵森, 吕星宇, 等. 荒漠生态系统C、N、P生态化学计量研究进展[J]. 中国沙漠, 2022, 42(1): 48-56. |
| ZHANG Z S, YANG G S, LÜ X Y, et al. Research progresses in ecological stoichiometry of C, N and P in desert ecosystems[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2022, 42(1): 48-56. | |
| [9] | 张明芳, 于雷, 戴梓萱, 等. 基于CNKI数据库对中国土地利用方式变化影响土壤有机碳趋势研究的文献计量分析[J]. 华中师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 56(6): 1044-1051. |
| ZHANG M F, YU L, DAI Z X, et al. Bibliometric analysis of the influence trend of land use change on soil organic carbon in China based on CNKI database[J]. Journal of Central China Normal University(Natural Sciences), 2022, 56(6): 1044-1051. | |
| [10] | 萨仁其力莫格, 荆佳强, 秦洁, 等. 不同利用方式下贝加尔针茅草原植物和土壤的生态化学计量特征[J]. 中国草地学报, 2022, 44(1): 20-29. |
| Sarenqilimoge, JING J Q, QIN J, et al. Ecological stoichiometric characteristics of plants and soil in Stipa baicalensis grassland under different utilization modes[J]. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2022, 44(1): 20-29. | |
| [11] | 胡义, 唐力, 张瑜, 等. 南郑区不同土地利用方式下土壤养分及生态化学计量特征[J]. 陕西林业科技, 2021, 49(3): 7-12. |
| HU Y, TANG L, ZHANG Y, et al. Soil nutrient and ecological stoichiometry in different land use patterns in Nanzheng district of Hanzhong prefecture[J]. Shaanxi Forest Science and Technology, 2021, 49(3): 7-12. | |
| [12] | 胡亚伟, 孙若修, 申明爽, 等. 晋西黄土区土地利用方式对土壤C∶N∶P化学计量特征及土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2021, 38(4): 990-999. |
| HU Y W, SUN R X, SHEN M S, et al. Effects of land use types on the stoichiometric characteristics of soil C∶N∶P and the physical and chemical properties of soil in western Shanxi loess region[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2021, 38(4): 990-999. | |
| [13] | 郭大勇, 刘海燕, 杜鹃, 等. 土地利用方式对豫西丘陵区土壤团聚体稳定性及其化学计量特征的影响[J]. 河南科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 45(3): 88-95. |
| GUO D Y, LIU H Y, DU J, et al. Effects of land use type on soil aggregate stability and its stoichiometric characteristics in hilly region of west Henan Province[J]. Journal of Henan University of Science and Technology(Natural Science), 2024, 45(3): 88-95. | |
| [14] | 颜雄, 李文昭, 周美姣, 等. 不同土地利用方式下土壤生态化学计量特征[J]. 遵义师范学院学报, 2024, 26(1): 75-78. |
| YAN X, LI W Z, ZHOU M J, et al. Ecochemical stoichiometric characteristics of soil under different land use patterns[J]. Journal of Zunyi Normal University, 2024, 26(1): 75-78. | |
| [15] | 廖达航, 白银萍, 李富程, 等. 四川盆地40年耕地土壤化学计量变化特征[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2024, 30(2): 205-213. |
| LIAO D H, BAI Y P, LI F C, et al. Soil stoichiometric characteristics of cultivated land in the Sichuan Basin over 40 years[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 2024, 30(2): 205-213. | |
| [16] | 姚卫举, 牟晓杰, 万斯昂, 等. 不同土地利用方式土壤碳、氮、磷、硫含量及其生态化学计量特征[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2023, 51(17): 231-239. |
| YAO W J, MU X J, WAN S A, et al. Soil carbon,nitrogen,phosphorus and sulfur contents and their eco-stoichiometric characteristics under different land use patterns[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 51(17): 231-239. | |
| [17] | 郭超, 盛茂银, 何宇, 等. 土地利用方式对西南喀斯特土壤碳、氮、磷化学计量特征及酶活性的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2023, 54(2): 382-391. |
| GUO C, SHENG M Y, HE Y, et al. Effects of land use types on soil carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus stoichiometric characteristics and enzyme activities in the karst area of southwest China[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2023, 54(2): 382-391. | |
| [18] | 孙彩丽, 王艺伟, 王从军, 等. 喀斯特山区土地利用方式转变对土壤酶活性及其化学计量特征的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(10): 4140-4149. |
| SUN C L, WANG Y W, WANG C J, et al. Effects of land use conversion on soil extracellular enzyme activity and its stoichiometric characteristics in karst mountainous areas[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021, 41(10): 4140-4149. | |
| [19] | 江叶枫, 叶英聪, 郭熙, 等. 江西省耕地土壤氮磷生态化学计量空间变异特征及其影响因素[J]. 土壤学报, 2017, 54(6): 1527-1539. |
| JIANG Y F, YE Y C, GUO X, et al. Spatial variability of ecological stoichiometry of soil nitrogen and phosphorus in farmlands of Jiangxi Province and its influencing factors[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2017, 54(6): 1527-1539. | |
| [20] | 冯德枫, 包维楷. 土壤碳氮磷化学计量比时空格局及影响因素研究进展[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2017, 23(2): 400-408. |
| FENG D F, BAO W K. Review of the temporal and spatial patterns of soil C: N: P stoichiometry and its driving factors[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 2017, 23(2): 400-408. | |
| [21] | 周正虎, 王传宽. 帽儿山地区不同土地利用方式下土壤-微生物-矿化碳氮化学计量特征[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(7): 2428-2436. |
| ZHOU Z H, WANG C K. Soil-microbe-mineralization carbon and nitrogen stoichiometry under different land-uses in the Maoershan region[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(7): 2428-2436. | |
| [22] | 李金澄, 吴迪. 土壤反硝化产物N2O/N2化学计量比例研究进展[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2023, 40(6): 1287-1295. |
| LI J C, WU D. Research progress on stoichiometric ratio of soil denitrification products N2O/N2[J]. Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environment, 2023, 40(6): 1287-1295. | |
| [23] | 王慧, 郭月峰, 姚云峰, 等. 不同土地利用方式下土壤碳氮磷化学计量特征[J]. 西南农业学报, 2020, 33(5): 995-1000. |
| WANG H, GUO Y F, YAO Y F, et al. Ecological stoichiometry of soil carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus under different land use patterns[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 33(5): 995-1000. | |
| [24] | 罗由林, 李启权, 王昌全, 等. 近30年川中丘陵区不同土地利用方式土壤碳氮磷生态化学计量特征变化[J]. 土壤, 2016, 48(4): 726-733. |
| LUO Y L, LI Q Q, WANG C Q, et al. Last 30a changes of C, N and P ecological stoichiometry of different land use types in hilly area of mid-Sichuan basin, southwest China[J]. Soils, 2016, 48(4): 726-733. | |
| [25] | 张晗, 欧阳真程, 赵小敏. 不同利用方式对江西省农田土壤碳氮磷生态化学计量特征的影响[J]. 环境科学学报, 2019, 39(3): 939-951. |
| ZHANG H, OUYANG Z C, ZHAO X M. Effects of different land use types on ecological stoichiometry characteristics of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in farmland soils in Jiangxi Province, China[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2019, 39(3): 939-951. | |
| [26] | 牟晓杰, 孙志高, 刘兴土. 黄河口典型潮滩湿地土壤净氮矿化与硝化作用[J]. 中国环境科学, 2015, 35(5): 1466-1473. |
| MOU X J, SUN Z G, LIU X T. Net nitrogen mineralization and nitrification in the tidal marsh soils of the Yellow River Estuary[J]. China Environmental Science, 2015, 35(5): 1466-1473. | |
| [27] | 刘帅楠, 李广, 杨传杰, 等. 植被类型对黄土丘陵区土壤碳氮磷化学计量特征的季节变异[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021, 35(6): 343-349. |
| LIU S N, LI G, YANG C J, et al. Seasonal variation of soil carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry under different vegetation types in Loess Hilly Region[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021, 35(6): 343-349. | |
| [28] | 陈志杰, 肖宇童, 董雄德, 等. 黄河中下游滩区泥沙淤积对土壤化学计量比的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41(7): 1334-1341. |
| CHEN Z J, XIAO Y T, DONG X D, et al. Effects of sediment deposition on soil stoichiometric ratios in the middle and lower reaches of the Yellow River[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2022, 41(7): 1334-1341. | |
| [29] | 王绍强, 于贵瑞. 生态系统碳氮磷元素的生态化学计量学特征[J]. 生态学报, 2008, 28(8): 3937-3947. |
| WANG S Q, YU G R. Ecological stoichiometry characteristics of ecosystem carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus elements[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008, 28(8): 3937-3947. | |
| [30] | 张剑, 宿力, 王利平, 等. 植被盖度对土壤碳、氮、磷生态化学计量比的影响: 以敦煌阳关湿地为例[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(2): 580-589. |
| ZHANG J, SU L, WANG L P, et al. The effect of vegetation cover on ecological stoichiometric ratios of soil carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus: a case study of the Dunhuang Yangguan wetland[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(2): 580-589. |
| [1] | WEI Qingcui, JIANG Naying, SHEN Junyang, ZHANG Huanchao, ZHANG Hengfeng. Effects of reduced chemical fertilization and biochar application on nitrogen and phosphorus leaching and soil properties of sandy soil [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(9): 1943-1950. |
| [2] | WANG Li, CHEN Liming, WANG Pengfei, ZHANG Bin, MU Xiaopeng. Effects of organic fertilizer combined with bacterial fertilizer on fruit quality and soil properties of Cerasus humilis [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(4): 820-830. |
| [3] | LI Tengfei, YANG Guiling, RUAN Meiying, CHU Tianfen, QIN Hua, DENG Meihua. Effects of fertilizer and pesticide managements on soil health and tomato qualities in greenhouse tomato cultivation [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(1): 145-158. |
| [4] | MA Ling, ZHANG Zhenwu, FANG Yingzi, WU Huixin, XING Chenghua. Effects of nitrogen reduction and biochar application on growth and development of Citurs reticulata Blanco cv. ‘Ponkan’ and soil properties [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(12): 2739-2747. |
| [5] | WANG Xintong, WAN Zuliang, YANG Zhenzhong, WANG Guojiao. Effects of rice straw returning to fields by wet harrow in autumn on leaf-soil ecological stoichiometry of rice at different growth stages [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(6): 1243-1252. |
| [6] | WU Jiao, GONG Chengyu, CHEN Chaoqun, CHEN Hongxu, LIU Junhong, TANG Wenjing, CHU Yuanqi, YANG Wenlong, ZHANG Yao, GONG Ronggao. Ecological response of organic acid metabolism of Huangguogan fruits at different altitudes [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(4): 853-861. |
| [7] | SUI Xiran, WANG Yan, LIU Yungen, ZHANG Yajie, WU Lifang. Responses of soil nutrients and microbial community to altitude in typical Pinus yunnanensis forest at rocky desertification region [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(12): 2348-2357. |
| [8] | LIAN Yuzhen, LIU Heman, CAO Lihua, HAN Xiaohao, MA Heping. Distribution of soil aggregate and organic carbon under different land use types in Linzhi, Tibet [J]. , 2019, 31(8): 1353-1360. |
| [9] | LAN Jiacheng, XIAO Shizhen, LIN Junqing, SHEN Yan. Effect of land use types on soil light and heavy fraction organic carbon in Karst mountain area [J]. , 2017, 29(10): 1720-1725. |
| [10] | JIAN Xing1,2, WANG Song3, WANG Yu\|liang3, WANG Jian\|fei1,2. Soil organic carbon and its active components characteristics under different land utilization types at the periphery of city wetlands [J]. , 2016, 28(1): 119-. |
| [11] | SONG Bi\|qing1,2,*,WANG Sha\|sha3,*,ZHENG Yun\|ye1,2,MA Wen\|guang1,2,**. Study on seed germination and stress\|responsive gene expression of tobacco seedlings from different areas and altitudes [J]. , 2015, 27(3): 321-. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||