Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis ›› 2026, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (8): 1589-1597.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20250457
• Horticultural Science • Previous Articles Next Articles
QIN Douwen(
), TIAN Jiting, JU Xiuting*(
)
Received:2025-06-23
Online:2026-08-25
Published:2026-09-14
CLC Number:
QIN Douwen, TIAN Jiting, JU Xiuting. Phenotypic diversity of flower color of Tulipa iliensis in Xinjiang of China and its correlation with geographical factors[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2026, 38(8): 1589-1597.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.zjnyxb.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20250457
| 居群编号 Population number | 采样地点 Location | 样本数量 Sample quantity | 海拔/m Altitude/m | 经度(E) Longitude(E) | 纬度(N) Latitude(N) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BDW | 乌鲁木齐市水磨沟区 Shuimogou District, Urumqi City, China | 15 | 803~853 | 87°42'27″ | 43°52'14″ |
| SRG | 乌鲁木齐市水磨沟区 Shuimogou District, Urumqi City, China | 15 | 924~1 007 | 87°46'54″ | 43°49'14″ |
| XLG | 乌鲁木齐市沙依巴克区 Saybagh District, Urumqi City, China | 15 | 866~885 | 87°30'01″ | 43°50'01″ |
| SMG | 乌鲁木齐市水磨沟区 Shuimogou District, Urumqi City, China | 15 | 958~984 | 87°42'53″ | 43°47'40″ |
| LCG | 乌鲁木齐市米东区 Midong District, Urumqi City, China | 15 | 896~944 | 87°48'01″ | 43°54'28″ |
| HXG | 乌鲁木齐市米东区 Midong District, Urumqi City, China | 15 | 1 067~1 155 | 87°53'46″ | 43°54'20″ |
| MXT | 乌鲁木齐市乌鲁木齐县 Urumqi County, Urumqi City, China | 15 | 1 531~1 629 | 87°37'52″ | 43°26'57″ |
| YML | 乌鲁木齐市沙依巴克区 Saybagh District, Urumqi City, China | 15 | 937~964 | 87°34'26″ | 43°47'54″ |
| BFG | 乌鲁木齐市乌鲁木齐县 Urumqi County, Urumqi City, China | 12 | 1 707~1 721 | 87°16'10″ | 43°27'13″ |
| BSF | 伊犁哈萨克自治州察布查尔锡伯自治县 Qapqal Xibe Autonomous County, Ili Kazak Autonomous Prefecture, China | 15 | 1 745~1 808 | 81°12'23″ | 43°32'56″ |
| YLH | 伊犁哈萨克自治州察布查尔锡伯自治县 Qapqal Xibe Autonomous County, Ili Kazak Autonomous Prefecture, China | 4 | 656~657 | 81°07'19″ | 43°29'44″ |
| NLT | 伊犁哈萨克自治州新源县 Xinyuan County, Ili Kazak Autonomous Prefecture, China | 15 | 1 685~1 723 | 80°57'59″ | 44°19'54″ |
| SMS | 昌吉回族自治州呼图壁县 Hutubi County, Changji Hui Autonomous Prefecture, China | 15 | 1 264~1 296 | 81°34'03″ | 43°43'39″ |
| GYM | 昌吉回族自治州呼图壁县 Hutubi County, Changji Hui Autonomous Prefecture, China | 15 | 1 333~1 369 | 84°18'39″ | 43°16'03″ |
| QEG | 昌吉回族自治州呼图壁县 Hutubi County, Changji Hui Autonomous Prefecture, China | 15 | 1 418~1 429 | 86°35'13″ | 43°48'07″ |
| KJS | 昌吉回族自治州呼图壁县 Hutubi County, Changji Hui Autonomous Prefecture, China | 15 | 1 637~1 673 | 86°37'25″ | 43°47'27″ |
| FHH | 昌吉回族自治州玛纳斯县 Manas County, Changji Hui Autonomous Prefecture, China | 15 | 1 349~1 364 | 86°29'19″ | 43°49'23″ |
| YHC | 昌吉回族自治州玛纳斯县 Manas County, Changji Hui Autonomous Prefecture, China | 15 | 1 332~1 334 | 86°20'07″ | 43°50'16″ |
| SWS | 塔城地区沙湾市 Shawan City, Tacheng Prefecture, China | 15 | 1 313~1 328 | 86°14'01″ | 43°52'46″ |
| GYG | 塔城地区沙湾市 Shawan City, Tacheng Prefecture, China | 14 | 1 289~1 327 | 86°11'30″ | 43°55'33″ |
| BET | 塔城地区沙湾市博尔通古乡 Bortonggu Township, Shawan City, Tacheng Prefecture, China | 15 | 1 668~1 697 | 85°51'22″ | 43°58'04″ |
| BYG | 塔城地区沙湾市博尔通古乡 Bortonggu Township, Shawan City, Tacheng Prefecture, China | 15 | 1 723~1 732 | 85°52'19″ | 43°55'58″ |
| XGB | 塔城地区沙湾市博尔通古乡 Bortonggu Township, Shawan City, Tacheng Prefecture, China | 5 | 955~962 | 85°15'19″ | 43°59'46″ |
Table 1 Sampling location information
| 居群编号 Population number | 采样地点 Location | 样本数量 Sample quantity | 海拔/m Altitude/m | 经度(E) Longitude(E) | 纬度(N) Latitude(N) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BDW | 乌鲁木齐市水磨沟区 Shuimogou District, Urumqi City, China | 15 | 803~853 | 87°42'27″ | 43°52'14″ |
| SRG | 乌鲁木齐市水磨沟区 Shuimogou District, Urumqi City, China | 15 | 924~1 007 | 87°46'54″ | 43°49'14″ |
| XLG | 乌鲁木齐市沙依巴克区 Saybagh District, Urumqi City, China | 15 | 866~885 | 87°30'01″ | 43°50'01″ |
| SMG | 乌鲁木齐市水磨沟区 Shuimogou District, Urumqi City, China | 15 | 958~984 | 87°42'53″ | 43°47'40″ |
| LCG | 乌鲁木齐市米东区 Midong District, Urumqi City, China | 15 | 896~944 | 87°48'01″ | 43°54'28″ |
| HXG | 乌鲁木齐市米东区 Midong District, Urumqi City, China | 15 | 1 067~1 155 | 87°53'46″ | 43°54'20″ |
| MXT | 乌鲁木齐市乌鲁木齐县 Urumqi County, Urumqi City, China | 15 | 1 531~1 629 | 87°37'52″ | 43°26'57″ |
| YML | 乌鲁木齐市沙依巴克区 Saybagh District, Urumqi City, China | 15 | 937~964 | 87°34'26″ | 43°47'54″ |
| BFG | 乌鲁木齐市乌鲁木齐县 Urumqi County, Urumqi City, China | 12 | 1 707~1 721 | 87°16'10″ | 43°27'13″ |
| BSF | 伊犁哈萨克自治州察布查尔锡伯自治县 Qapqal Xibe Autonomous County, Ili Kazak Autonomous Prefecture, China | 15 | 1 745~1 808 | 81°12'23″ | 43°32'56″ |
| YLH | 伊犁哈萨克自治州察布查尔锡伯自治县 Qapqal Xibe Autonomous County, Ili Kazak Autonomous Prefecture, China | 4 | 656~657 | 81°07'19″ | 43°29'44″ |
| NLT | 伊犁哈萨克自治州新源县 Xinyuan County, Ili Kazak Autonomous Prefecture, China | 15 | 1 685~1 723 | 80°57'59″ | 44°19'54″ |
| SMS | 昌吉回族自治州呼图壁县 Hutubi County, Changji Hui Autonomous Prefecture, China | 15 | 1 264~1 296 | 81°34'03″ | 43°43'39″ |
| GYM | 昌吉回族自治州呼图壁县 Hutubi County, Changji Hui Autonomous Prefecture, China | 15 | 1 333~1 369 | 84°18'39″ | 43°16'03″ |
| QEG | 昌吉回族自治州呼图壁县 Hutubi County, Changji Hui Autonomous Prefecture, China | 15 | 1 418~1 429 | 86°35'13″ | 43°48'07″ |
| KJS | 昌吉回族自治州呼图壁县 Hutubi County, Changji Hui Autonomous Prefecture, China | 15 | 1 637~1 673 | 86°37'25″ | 43°47'27″ |
| FHH | 昌吉回族自治州玛纳斯县 Manas County, Changji Hui Autonomous Prefecture, China | 15 | 1 349~1 364 | 86°29'19″ | 43°49'23″ |
| YHC | 昌吉回族自治州玛纳斯县 Manas County, Changji Hui Autonomous Prefecture, China | 15 | 1 332~1 334 | 86°20'07″ | 43°50'16″ |
| SWS | 塔城地区沙湾市 Shawan City, Tacheng Prefecture, China | 15 | 1 313~1 328 | 86°14'01″ | 43°52'46″ |
| GYG | 塔城地区沙湾市 Shawan City, Tacheng Prefecture, China | 14 | 1 289~1 327 | 86°11'30″ | 43°55'33″ |
| BET | 塔城地区沙湾市博尔通古乡 Bortonggu Township, Shawan City, Tacheng Prefecture, China | 15 | 1 668~1 697 | 85°51'22″ | 43°58'04″ |
| BYG | 塔城地区沙湾市博尔通古乡 Bortonggu Township, Shawan City, Tacheng Prefecture, China | 15 | 1 723~1 732 | 85°52'19″ | 43°55'58″ |
| XGB | 塔城地区沙湾市博尔通古乡 Bortonggu Township, Shawan City, Tacheng Prefecture, China | 5 | 955~962 | 85°15'19″ | 43°59'46″ |
Fig.1 Phenotypic characteristics of some populations of Tulipa iliensis A, Individual morphology of Tulipa iliensis in some populations; B, Back side of outer perianth of Tulipa iliensis in some populations; C, Petal morphology of Tulipa iliensis in some populations.
| 居群Population | L* | a* | b* | C* | h/(°) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BDW | 52.96±1.97 fg | 10.08±1.68 abcd | 22.78±2.41 gh | 26.39±1.78 gh | 51.10±11.07 ab |
| SRG | 55.39±1.68 def | 12.70±1.97 ab | 28.20±2.02 efg | 31.98±1.80 efgh | 65.20±3.82 a |
| XLG | 57.22±1.46 cdef | 10.18±1.57 abcd | 29.43±2.49 defg | 31.89±2.30 efgh | 69.36±3.69 a |
| SMG | 56.12±1.89 def | 10.41±2.07 abcd | 27.48±3.35 efgh | 31.18±2.78 efgh | 54.05±11.51 ab |
| HXG | 55.44±1.58 def | 11.68±1.56 abc | 25.80±1.51 fgh | 29.09±1.25 fgh | 64.87±3.39 a |
| LCG | 58.17±2.13 cdef | 9.03±1.43 abcd | 30.40±2.67 cdefg | 32.49±2.36 defgh | 58.93±11.09 ab |
| MXT | 53.88±1.90 efg | 4.52±1.86 de | 23.57±2.41 gh | 25.97±1.49 h | 25.62±18.75 b |
| YML | 59.27±1.73 bcdef | 6.23±1.44 cde | 33.54±1.79 abcdef | 34.85±1.29 bcdef | 66.23±11.60 a |
| BFG | 60.33±1.72 bcde | 2.43±1.88 e | 34.24±2.61 abcdef | 35.22±2.16 bcdef | 24.82±24.27 b |
| BSF | 49.27±2.28 gh | 13.39±1.49 ab | 24.29±2.16 gh | 28.48±2.74 fgh | 58.44±4.23 ab |
| YLH | 57.35±2.92 cdef | 5.99±1.40 cde | 31.11±3.97 bcdefg | 31.86±3.74 efgh | 78.27±3.54 a |
| NLT | 45.64±2.07 h | 14.95±1.35 a | 19.13±2.90 h | 25.88±2.12 h | 47.49±5.24 ab |
| GYG | 62.87±1.80 abc | 8.95±1.96 abcd | 39.43±2.30 ab | 41.08±2.27 abc | 76.74±2.84 a |
| YHC | 61.97±1.40 abcd | 10.38±1.23 abcd | 40.05±2.16 ab | 41.58±2.21 ab | 75.39±1.48 a |
| QEG | 61.06±1.92 abcd | 8.91±0.80 abcd | 35.66±2.41 abcde | 37.16±2.07 abcde | 74.20±2.70 a |
| SMS | 57.39±1.75 cdef | 10.80±2.45 abc | 30.16±2.40 cdefg | 33.71±1.97 cdefg | 57.10±11.13 ab |
| GYM | 62.81±1.36 abc | 6.38±1.55 cde | 38.83±2.19 abc | 39.84±2.10 abcd | 56.49±15.24 ab |
| FHH | 61.67±1.05 abcd | 8.65±1.08 bcd | 39.69±1.87 ab | 40.86±1.81 abc | 77.38±1.76 a |
| SWS | 64.78±2.01 ab | 8.74±1.43 bcd | 40.83±2.29 a | 42.30±1.99 ab | 64.98±11.19 a |
| KJS | 59.86±2.09 bcde | 11.53±1.54 abc | 37.43±3.62 abcd | 40.23±3.07 abc | 70.05±4.05 a |
| BET | 59.43±1.66 bcde | 7.50±1.84 bcde | 36.05±2.63 abcde | 37.98±2.03 abcde | 52.18±15.25 ab |
| XGB | 67.19±2.59 a | 9.63±1.87 abcd | 42.20±4.71 a | 43.50±4.57 a | 76.69±3.12 a |
| BYG | 60.19±1.36 bcde | 9.49±1.32 abcd | 35.21±1.65 abcde | 36.97±1.34 abcde | 74.29±2.70 a |
Table 2 Flower colour traits of different populations of Tulipa iliensis
| 居群Population | L* | a* | b* | C* | h/(°) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BDW | 52.96±1.97 fg | 10.08±1.68 abcd | 22.78±2.41 gh | 26.39±1.78 gh | 51.10±11.07 ab |
| SRG | 55.39±1.68 def | 12.70±1.97 ab | 28.20±2.02 efg | 31.98±1.80 efgh | 65.20±3.82 a |
| XLG | 57.22±1.46 cdef | 10.18±1.57 abcd | 29.43±2.49 defg | 31.89±2.30 efgh | 69.36±3.69 a |
| SMG | 56.12±1.89 def | 10.41±2.07 abcd | 27.48±3.35 efgh | 31.18±2.78 efgh | 54.05±11.51 ab |
| HXG | 55.44±1.58 def | 11.68±1.56 abc | 25.80±1.51 fgh | 29.09±1.25 fgh | 64.87±3.39 a |
| LCG | 58.17±2.13 cdef | 9.03±1.43 abcd | 30.40±2.67 cdefg | 32.49±2.36 defgh | 58.93±11.09 ab |
| MXT | 53.88±1.90 efg | 4.52±1.86 de | 23.57±2.41 gh | 25.97±1.49 h | 25.62±18.75 b |
| YML | 59.27±1.73 bcdef | 6.23±1.44 cde | 33.54±1.79 abcdef | 34.85±1.29 bcdef | 66.23±11.60 a |
| BFG | 60.33±1.72 bcde | 2.43±1.88 e | 34.24±2.61 abcdef | 35.22±2.16 bcdef | 24.82±24.27 b |
| BSF | 49.27±2.28 gh | 13.39±1.49 ab | 24.29±2.16 gh | 28.48±2.74 fgh | 58.44±4.23 ab |
| YLH | 57.35±2.92 cdef | 5.99±1.40 cde | 31.11±3.97 bcdefg | 31.86±3.74 efgh | 78.27±3.54 a |
| NLT | 45.64±2.07 h | 14.95±1.35 a | 19.13±2.90 h | 25.88±2.12 h | 47.49±5.24 ab |
| GYG | 62.87±1.80 abc | 8.95±1.96 abcd | 39.43±2.30 ab | 41.08±2.27 abc | 76.74±2.84 a |
| YHC | 61.97±1.40 abcd | 10.38±1.23 abcd | 40.05±2.16 ab | 41.58±2.21 ab | 75.39±1.48 a |
| QEG | 61.06±1.92 abcd | 8.91±0.80 abcd | 35.66±2.41 abcde | 37.16±2.07 abcde | 74.20±2.70 a |
| SMS | 57.39±1.75 cdef | 10.80±2.45 abc | 30.16±2.40 cdefg | 33.71±1.97 cdefg | 57.10±11.13 ab |
| GYM | 62.81±1.36 abc | 6.38±1.55 cde | 38.83±2.19 abc | 39.84±2.10 abcd | 56.49±15.24 ab |
| FHH | 61.67±1.05 abcd | 8.65±1.08 bcd | 39.69±1.87 ab | 40.86±1.81 abc | 77.38±1.76 a |
| SWS | 64.78±2.01 ab | 8.74±1.43 bcd | 40.83±2.29 a | 42.30±1.99 ab | 64.98±11.19 a |
| KJS | 59.86±2.09 bcde | 11.53±1.54 abc | 37.43±3.62 abcd | 40.23±3.07 abc | 70.05±4.05 a |
| BET | 59.43±1.66 bcde | 7.50±1.84 bcde | 36.05±2.63 abcde | 37.98±2.03 abcde | 52.18±15.25 ab |
| XGB | 67.19±2.59 a | 9.63±1.87 abcd | 42.20±4.71 a | 43.50±4.57 a | 76.69±3.12 a |
| BYG | 60.19±1.36 bcde | 9.49±1.32 abcd | 35.21±1.65 abcde | 36.97±1.34 abcde | 74.29±2.70 a |
| 类群 Group | 居群数量 Number of populations | L* | a* | b* | C* | h/(°) | 百分比/% Percentage/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ⅰ | 10 | 53.88~60.33 | 2.43~12.70 | 23.57~34.24 | 25.97~35.22 | 24.82~78.27 | 43.48 |
| Ⅱ | 10 | 59.43~67.19 | 6.38~11.53 | 35.21~42.20 | 36.97~43.50 | 52.18~77.38 | 43.48 |
| Ⅲ | 3 | 45.64~52.96 | 10.08~14.95 | 19.13~24.29 | 25.88~28.48 | 47.49~58.44 | 13.04 |
Table 3 Characteristics of flower color parameters in different groups of Tulipa iliensis
| 类群 Group | 居群数量 Number of populations | L* | a* | b* | C* | h/(°) | 百分比/% Percentage/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ⅰ | 10 | 53.88~60.33 | 2.43~12.70 | 23.57~34.24 | 25.97~35.22 | 24.82~78.27 | 43.48 |
| Ⅱ | 10 | 59.43~67.19 | 6.38~11.53 | 35.21~42.20 | 36.97~43.50 | 52.18~77.38 | 43.48 |
| Ⅲ | 3 | 45.64~52.96 | 10.08~14.95 | 19.13~24.29 | 25.88~28.48 | 47.49~58.44 | 13.04 |
| 性状 Traits | 相关系数Correlation coefficient | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 海拔 Altitude | 经度 Longitude | 纬度 Latitude | |
| L* | -0.144 | 0.202 | 0.712** |
| a* | 0.030 | -0.178 | 0.020 |
| b* | 0.037 | 0.009 | 0.639** |
| C* | 0.088 | -0.006 | 0.632** |
| h | -0.365 | -0.248 | 0.665** |
Table 4 Correlation coefficients between flower color traits of Tulipa iliensis and geographical factors
| 性状 Traits | 相关系数Correlation coefficient | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 海拔 Altitude | 经度 Longitude | 纬度 Latitude | |
| L* | -0.144 | 0.202 | 0.712** |
| a* | 0.030 | -0.178 | 0.020 |
| b* | 0.037 | 0.009 | 0.639** |
| C* | 0.088 | -0.006 | 0.632** |
| h | -0.365 | -0.248 | 0.665** |
| [1] | 张艺祎. 四川独蒜兰居群花色数量分布模式及调控基因研究[D]. 福州: 福建农林大学, 2019. |
| Zhang Y Y. Flower colors distribution pattern and regulated genes within population of Pleione limprichtii[D]. Fuzhou: Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 2019. | |
| [2] | Menzel R, Shmida A. The ecology of flower colours and the natural colour vision of insect pollinators: the Israeli flora as a study case[J]. Biological Reviews, 1993, 68(1): 81-120. |
| [3] | Ellis A G, Johnson S D. The evolution of floral variation without pollinator shifts in Gorteria diffusa(Asteraceae)[J]. American Journal of Botany, 2009, 96(4): 793-801. |
| [4] | Trunschke J, Lunau K, Pyke G H, et al. Flower color evolution and the evidence of pollinator-mediated selection[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2021, 12: 617851. |
| [5] | 迟楠燕. 华北耧斗菜(Aquilegia yabeana)野生居群间花色变异的初步研究[D]. 西安: 陕西师范大学, 2019. |
| Chi N Y. Preliminary study on flower color variation among wild populations of Aquilegia yabeana[D]. Xi’an: Shaanxi Normal University, 2019. | |
| [6] | 邢桂梅, 刘振雷, 张艳秋, 等. 三个野生郁金香的繁殖方法[J]. 北方园艺, 2018(6): 62-67. |
| Xing G M, Liu Z L, Zhang Y Q, et al. Propagation methods of three wild tulips[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2018(6): 62-67. | |
| [7] | 谭敦炎. 新疆的郁金香属种质资源[J]. 植物杂志, 2001(6): 1. |
| Tan D Y. Germplasm resources of tulip in Xinjiang[J]. Plants, 2001(6): 1. | |
| [8] | Xing G M, Qu L W, Zhang W, et al. Study on interspecific hybridization between tulip cultivars and wild species native to China[J]. Euphytica, 2020, 216(4): 66. |
| [9] | 张艳秋, 吴天宇, 张宏斌, 等. 通过远缘杂交培育郁金香新品种‘雪域湘妃’[J]. 辽宁林业科技, 2024(2): 1-4. |
| Zhang Y Q, Wu T Y, Zhang H B, et al. Breeding new tulip varieties‘Xueyu Xiangfei’ by distant hybridization[J]. Liaoning Forestry Science and Technology, 2024(2): 1-4. | |
| [10] | 李涛, 许震, 富锐. 新疆2种野生郁金香的生物学特性及栽培利用[J]. 现代园艺, 2016, 39(8): 6. |
| Li T, Xu Z, Fu R. Biological characteristics and cultivation and utilization of two wild tulips in Xinjiang[J]. Xiandai Horticulture, 2016, 39(8): 6. | |
| [11] | 邢桂梅, 张艳秋, 张伟, 等. 中国野生郁金香资源研究及利用进展[C]// 中国园艺学会球宿根花卉分会, 中国园艺学会. 中国球宿根花卉研究进展2019. 北京:中国林业出版社, 2019: 18-23. |
| [12] | 田蔼茜, 秦巧平, 张志国, 等. 萱草花色育种研究进展[J]. 植物生理学报, 2023, 59(1): 1-12. |
| Tian A X, Qin Q P, Zhang Z G, et al. Research progress of daylily (Hemerocallis spp.) flower coloration breeding[J]. Plant Physiology Journal, 2023, 59(1): 1-12. | |
| [13] | 葛翎, 黄晓德, 张峰伦, 等. 郁金香的化学成分及药理活性研究进展[J]. 中国野生植物资源, 2019, 38(5): 79-83. |
| Ge L, Huang X D, Zhang F L, et al. Research progress on chemical constituents and pharmacological activities of tulips[J]. Chinese Wild Plant Resources, 2019, 38(5): 79-83. | |
| [14] | 康晓珊, 张永智, 杨维康, 等. 新疆野生郁金香的园艺价值及保护利用[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2018, 46(24): 39-41. |
| Kang X S, Zhang Y Z, Yang W K, et al. Ornamental value of wild Tulipa L. resources and protection in Xinjiang[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 46(24): 39-41. | |
| [15] | 王玉荣. 新疆郁金香属植物生物学特性及资源评价研究[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆农业大学, 2001. |
| Wang Y R. Studies on the biological characters and resources evaluation of Tulipa from Xinjiang[D]. Urumqi: Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2001. | |
| [16] | 张晓菲, 杨佳明, 商旭文, 等. 萱草育种目标研究[J]. 园艺与种苗, 2020, 40(9): 22-23. |
| Zhang X F, Yang J M, Shang X W, et al. Study on breeding target of Hemerocallis fulva[J]. Horticulture & Seed, 2020, 40(9): 22-23. | |
| [17] | 王美辰, 朱培龙, 程少颖, 等. RHS比色卡法与基于CIELAB色差仪法评价丁香花色的差异分析[J/OL]. 草地学报, 2026-04-21. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/11.3362.S.20260421.1430.005. |
| Wang M C, Zhu P L, Cheng S Y, et al. Analysis of the differences between the RHS color chart method and CIELAB-based colorimetric method in evaluating lilac flower colors[J/OL]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2026-04-21. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/11.3362.S.20260421.1430.005. | |
| [18] | Zhao L Q, Liu Y, Huang Q, et al. Effects of cell morphology, physiology, biochemistry and CHS genes on four flower colors of Impatiens uliginosa[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2024, 15: 1343830. |
| [19] | Tanaka Y, Sasaki N, Ohmiya A. Biosynthesis of plant pigments: anthocyanins, betalains and carotenoids[J]. The Plant Journal, 2008, 54(4): 733-749. |
| [20] | Li W, Liu H, Cheng Z J, et al. DNA methylation and histone modifications regulate de novo shoot regeneration in Arabidopsis by modulating WUSCHEL expression and auxin signaling[J]. PLoS Genetics, 2011, 7(8): e1002243. |
| [21] | Hondo T, Yoshida K, Nakagawa A, et al. Structural basis of blue-colour development in flower petals from Commelina communis[J]. Nature, 1992, 358(6386): 515-518. |
| [22] | Berendsen R L, Pieterse C M J, Bakker P A H M. The rhizosphere microbiome and plant health[J]. Trends in Plant Science, 2012, 17(8): 478-486. |
| [23] | Fan X Q, Trunschke J, Ren Z X, et al. Why are the inner and outer sides of many flower petals differently coloured?[J]. Plant Biology, 2024, 26(5): 665-674. |
| [24] | Sobral M, Losada M, Veiga T, et al. Flower color preferences of insects and livestock: effects on Gentiana lutea reproductive success[J]. PeerJ, 2016, 4: e1685. |
| [25] | 李正春, 刘福元. 早春返青最早的优质牧草: 天山郁金香[J]. 农村百事通, 2008(20): 44. |
| Li Z C, Liu F Y. Tulip in Tianshan Mountain: the earliest high-quality forage grass turning green in early spring[J]. Nongcun Baishitong, 2008(20): 44. | |
| [26] | Wang H, Talavera M, Min Y, et al. Neutral processes contribute to patterns of spatial variation for flower colour in the Mediterranean Iris lutescens(Iridaceae)[J]. Annals of Botany, 2016, 117(6): 995-1007. |
| [27] | Qin D W, Liu W Q, Tian J T, et al. Genetic structure and phylogeographic of Tulipa iliensis[J]. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 2025, 57(4): 1388-1397. |
| [28] | 章彦君, 王艺光, 周杰, 等. 不同花色凤仙花群体性状变异分析[J]. 浙江林业科技, 2022, 42(4): 37-43. |
| Zhang Y J, Wang Y G, Zhou J, et al. Variation in traits of Impatiens balsamina population with different floral color[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2022, 42(4): 37-43. | |
| [29] | 庞薇. 华北耧斗菜(Aquilegia yabeana)野生居群间花色变异的遗传学基础研究[D]. 西安: 陕西师范大学, 2021. |
| Pang W. Genetic basis of flower color variation among wild populations of Aquilegia yabeana[D]. Xi’an: Shaanxi Normal University, 2021. | |
| [30] | Ma Y Y, Ma X, Gao X, et al. Light induced regulation pathway of anthocyanin biosynthesis in plants[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2021, 22(20): 11116. |
| [31] | Yoshida K, Toyama-Kato Y, Kameda K, et al. Sepal color variation of Hydrangea macrophylla and vacuolar pH measured with a proton-selective microelectrode[J]. Plant & Cell Physiology, 2003, 44(3): 262-268. |
| [32] | Griesbach R J. Correlation of pH and light intensity on flower color in potted Eustoma grandiflorum grise[J]. HortScience, 1992, 27(7): 817-818. |
| [33] | Shrestha M, Tai K C, Dyer A G, et al. Flower colour and size-signals vary with altitude and resulting climate on the tropical-subtropical islands of Taiwan[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2024, 15: 1304849. |
| [34] | Kashin A S, Kritskaya T A, Kondratieva A O, et al. The geographical distribution of flower colour in Tulipa suaveolens Roth across its European range[J]. Biology Bulletin, 2022, 49(10): 1947-1957. |
| [35] | Koski M H, Ashman T L. Macroevolutionary patterns of ultraviolet floral pigmentation explained by geography and associated bioclimatic factors[J]. New Phytologist, 2016, 211(2): 708-718. |
| [36] | Ruhland C T, Day T A. Effects of ultraviolet-B radiation on leaf elongation, production and phenylpropanoid concentrations of Deschampsia antarctica and Colobanthus quitensis in Antarctica[J]. Physiologia Plantarum, 2000, 109(3): 244-251. |
| [37] | Koski M H, Ashman T L. Floral pigmentation patterns provide an example of Gloger’s rule in plants[J]. Nature Plants, 2015, 1: 14007. |
| [38] | Mathesius U. Flavonoid functions in plants and their interactions with other organisms[J]. Plants, 2018, 7(2): 30. |
| [1] | GUO Wei, MA Xiansen, NIE Hongyan, SONG Zhihao, ZHOU Yi, CHEN Guangxun, CHEN Zhengwu. Diversity analysis and comprehensive evaluation of biochemical components of 35 accessions of tea plants in Guizhou Province, China [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2026, 38(8): 1517-1528. |
| [2] | HUANG Guohong, MA Yini, HE Jiaxin, TU Li, LIAO Weibiao, LIU Fengluan. Basic characteristics and genetic variation of genome-wide simple sequence repeats in Asian lotus (Nelumbo nucifera) [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2026, 38(8): 1574-1588. |
| [3] | LAN Huijie, GAO Hongwei, JI Jiaruo, CAI Ruiguo, ZHANG Min, LIN Xiaohu, YANG Min. Comprehensive evaluation of 45 adzuki bean germplasms [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2026, 38(6): 1177-1186. |
| [4] | DENG Yundan, LU Chengrui, LI Lushan, XU Yongyan. Determination and evaluation of nutrient contents in bulbs of 10 lily varieties [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2026, 38(6): 1228-1235. |
| [5] | MA Huifang, WANG Juanfei, XUE Hongli, REN Guoxiang, SHI Guanyan. Genetic analysis of yield and phenotypic traits in new foxtail millet hybrid lines [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2026, 38(3): 428-439. |
| [6] | LIU Jing, WANG Jian, HUANG Yu, WU Xiaohua, GUO Xuanhe, WANG Ying, LI Guojing, XU Xiaojiang. Indicator screening and model development for evaluating pumpkin fruit quality [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2026, 38(2): 248-257. |
| [7] | HE Suyue, LI Yan, DING Yunqian, LI Xinze, HAN Qinghui, CHEN Xiaoyang. Phylogenetic analysis of maize landraces in Zhejiang Province of China based on SSR markers [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2026, 38(1): 24-34. |
| [8] | XU Weimeng, XU Yan, CHEN Guoli. Comprehensive evaluation of waxy corn quality based on various analytical methods [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(9): 1840-1848. |
| [9] | LIU Sitong, HOU Yu, PAN Jiaquan, ZHOU Huanan, CUI Liang, WAN Bo, YU Tao. Physiological response of sweetpotato to the low temperature and evaluation of cold tolerance [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(4): 767-778. |
| [10] | GUO Saisai, NIE Zhixing, FU Hongfei, WANG Tonglin, SHAO Zhiyong, WANG Hong, ZHENG Jirong. Phenotypic characters and SRAP genetic diversity analysis of 37 pepper germplasm resources [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(2): 300-310. |
| [11] | QIN Douwen, LIU Weiqiang, TIAN Jiting, JU Xiuting. Establishment of cpDNA-PCR reaction system and genetic diversity analysis of Tulipa iliensis [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(1): 78-89. |
| [12] | DONG Lili, XU Zhihao, YAN Canlong, FAN Xiaoping, JIN Zelan, WANG Zhonghua. Molecular identification and genetic relationship of different breeding populations in Fritillaria thunbergii based on phenotype and molecular markers [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(8): 1719-1730. |
| [13] | LI Yadong, LUO Xiaobo, PENG Xiao, YANG Guangqian, JIN Yueyue, ZU Guidong, TIAN Huan, ZHANG Wanping. Development of SNP and InDel markers in radish and their association with phenotypic characters [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(5): 1055-1066. |
| [14] | XUE Xianbin, JIA Qiong, CHEN Zhengfeng, LI Ruiyuan, CHEN Qingfu, SHI Taoxiong. Comprehensive evaluation of agronomic characteristics of recombinant inbred lines of Tartary buckwheat based on principal component analysis [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(4): 748-759. |
| [15] | CHEN Xiaojuan, LUO Jun, WANG Fumin, LI Tuojian, QU Yan. Excavation of key genes for yellow flower formation in Meconopsis integrifolia [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(4): 811-824. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||