Pathogen identification and indoor toxicity tests on root rot of Codonopsis pilosula

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2021.01.12

Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (1): 96-103.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2021.01.12

• Plant Protection • Previous Articles Next Articles

Pathogen identification and indoor toxicity tests on root rot of Codonopsis pilosula

XU Xuefen¹(), NI Chunhui¹, LI Huixia¹^,^*(), LI Huanyu¹, LI Wenhao¹, CHEN Yuan², HU Fangdi³

1. College of Plant Protection, Gansu Agricultural University, Biocontrol Engineering Laboratory of Crop Diseases and Pests of Gansu Province, Lanzhou 730070, China
2. College of Agronomy, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China
3. College of Pharmacy, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730030, China

Received:2020-03-21 Online:2021-01-25 Published:2021-01-25
Contact: LI Huixia

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to identify the pathogenic fungi causing the root rot of Codonopsis pilosula in Weiyuan County of Gansu Province and screen the best fungicides to control the disease, the pathogen causing the root rot of Codonopsis pilosula was isolated and purified by tissue isolation and single spore isolation. The pathogen was identified by pathogenicity determination, colony morphological characteristics, and clustering analysis of coding transcription extension factor region (TEF-1α). The toxicity was determined by growth rate method. The results of pathogen identification showed that Fusarium solani and Fusarium acuminatum were the pathogens causing root rot of Codonopsis pilosula in Weiyuan County of Gansu Province. The results of virulence test showed that all the six fungicides had inhibitory effect on them. Among them, 25% myclobutanil EC and 50% carbendazim WP had strong control effect (EC₅₀<0.05 g·L ^-1), which could be used as the main fungicides to control the root rot of Codonopsis pilosula.

Key words: Codonopsis pilosula, root rot, Fusarium solani, Fusarium acuminatum, identification, fungicide

CLC Number:

S435.67

XU Xuefen, NI Chunhui, LI Huixia, LI Huanyu, LI Wenhao, CHEN Yuan, HU Fangdi. Pathogen identification and indoor toxicity tests on root rot of Codonopsis pilosula[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(1): 96-103.

Figures/Tables 8

References 23

[1]	李忠虎, 蔺海明, 陈垣, 等. 不同干燥方式对党参多糖含量的影响[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2007,42(3):64-67.
	LI Z H, LIN H M, CHEN Y, et al. Effects of different drying ways on polysaccharide content of Codonopsis pilosula[J]. Journal of Gansu Agricultural University, 2007,42(3):64-67.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]	刘美霞, 戚进, 余伯阳. 党参药理作用研究进展[J]. 海峡药学, 2018,30(11):36-39.
	LIU M X, QI J, YU B Y. Research progress on the pharmacological activity of Codonopsis pilosula[J]. Strait Pharmaceutical Journal, 2018,30(11):36-39.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]	王艳, 陈秀蓉, 王引权, 等. 甘肃省党参病害种类调查及病原鉴定[J]. 山西农业科学, 2011,39(8):866-868.
	WANG Y, CHEN X R, WANG Y Q, et al. Disease survey and pathogen identification on Codonopsis pilosula in Gansu Province[J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences, 2011,39(8):866-868.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]	张弩, 王代明. 不同药剂处理对连作党参根腐病防治试验[J]. 农业科技与信息, 2019,16(12):29-30.
	ZHANG N, WANG D M. Control experiment of root rot of continuous cropping Codonopsis pilosula with different fungicides[J]. Information of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019,16(12):29-30.(in Chinese)
[5]	赵纯森, 李德望, 卫扬斗, 等. 党参根腐病病株上分离的几种病原真菌的致病性及其生物学特性:党参根腐病研究续报Ⅰ[J]. 湖北农业科学, 1989(6):23-25.
	ZHAO C S, LI D W, WEI Y D, et al. Pathogenicity and biological characteristics of several pathogenic fungi isolated from the root rot disease of Codonopsis pilosula: study on root rot of Codonopsis pilosula Ⅰ[J]. Journal of Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 1989(6):23-25.
[6]	余中莲, 雷美艳, 蒲盛才, 等. 重庆党参真菌病害种类调查及病原鉴定[J]. 中药材, 2015,38(6):1119-1122.
	YU Z L, LEI M Y, PU S C, et al. Fungal disease survey and pathogen identification on Codonopsis tangshen in Chongqing[J]. Journal of Chinese Medicinal Materials, 2015,38(6):1119-1122.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]	孙新荣, 张西梅, 高薇薇, 等. 甘肃党参根腐病发生危害与防治[J]. 陕西农业科学, 2019,65(12):90-91.
	SUN X R, ZHANG X M, GAO W W, et al. Occurrence and damages of Radix codonopsis root rot and its control in Gansu[J]. Shaanxi Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2019,65(12):90-91.(in Chinese)
[8]	方中达. 植病研究方法[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1998.
[9]	陈为京, 郭峰, 陈建爱, 等. 连作花生根腐病镰刀菌分离与对峙培养[J]. 花生学报, 2018,47(2):47-51.
	CHEN W J, GUO F, CHEN J N, et al. Isolation of Fusarium from continuous cropping of peanut root rot and dual cultured[J]. Journal of Peanut Science, 2018,47(2):47-51.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]	黄亚萍. 当归根腐病病原物研究[D]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2011.
	HUANG Y P. Studies on the pathogens causing Angelica sinensis root rot[D]. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2011.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]	LESLIE J F, SUMMERELL B A. The Fusarium laboratory manual[M]. Ames: Blackwell Publishing, 2006.
[12]	魏景超. 真菌鉴定手册[M]. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 1979.
[13]	郭炜. 西北地区冬小麦普通根腐病和茎基腐病病原鉴定及种质资源抗性筛选[D]. 兰州:甘肃农业大学, 2018.
	GUO W. Studies on the pathogens and resistance to common root rot and crown rot on winter wheat in Northwest, China[D]. Gansu Agricultural University, 2018. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]	宋雯, 王春巧, 俞燕, 等. 棉花黄萎病菌鸟氨酸脱羧酶抗酶蛋白基因VdOAZ的功能分析[J]. 棉花学报, 2019,31(2):101-113. DOI URL
	SONG W, WANG C Q, YU Y, et al. Functional analysis of an ornithine decarboxylase antizyme gene VdOAZ in Verticillium dahliae isolated from cotton[J]. Cotton Science, 2019,31(2):101-113.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]	陈伟, 何静, 多甜甜, 等. 几种杀菌剂对枸杞根腐病菌的室内毒力测定[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2017,52(1):109-113.
	CHEN W, HE J, DUO T T, et al. Toxicity test on several fungicides against Chinese wolfberry root rot in vitro[J]. Journal of Gansu Agricultural University, 2017,52(1):109-113.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]	黄彰欣. 植物化学保护实验指导[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1993.
[17]	陈年春. 农药生物测定技术[M]. 北京: 北京农业大学出版社, 1991.
[18]	田洪, 王殿芝, 张宝国. 轮叶党参的病害防治[J]. 新农业, 1999(4):28.
	TIAN H, WANG D Z, ZHANG B G. Disease control of Codonopsis lanceolata[J]. New Agriculture, 1999(4):28. (in Chinese)
[19]	龙合正, 安勇. 浅析威宁县党参根腐病的发生及防治[J]. 山西农经, 2018(9):78.
	LONG H Z, AN Y. Analysis on the occurrence and control of root rot of Codonopsis pilosula in Weining County[J]. Shanxi Agricultural Economy, 2018(9):78. (in Chinese)
[20]	高芬, 赵晓霞, 秦雪梅, 等. 山西省蒙古黄芪根腐病优势致病菌群分析[J]. 植物保护学报, 2018,45(4):878-885.
	GAO F, ZHAO X X, QIN X M, et al. Analysis of dominant pathogen community causing Astragalus membranaceus var.mongholicus root rot in Shanxi Province[J]. Acta Phytophylacica Sinica, 2018,45(4):878-885.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]	傅俊范. 中草药病害防治系列(5):党参病害防治[J]. 新农业, 2000(10):42-43.
	FU F J. Chinese herbal medicine disease control series(5): disease control of Codonopsis pilosula[J]. New Agriculture, 2000(10):42-43. (in Chinese)
[22]	蒋成全. 十种杀菌剂对当归根腐病菌的室内毒力测定[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2019,58(5):54-55, 60.
	JIANG C Q. Indoor toxicity test of ten fungicides against pathogens of Angelica sinensis root rot[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2019,58(5):54-55, 60.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]	阮柳, 马占鸿, 刘振宇, 等. 苜蓿根腐病的病原分离、鉴定与杀菌剂毒力测定[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2016,21(6):56-67.
	RUAN L, MA Z H, LIU Z Y, et al. Isolation, identification and toxicity determination of pathogens causing alfalfa root rot[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2016,21(6):56-67.(in Chinese with English abstract)

药剂名称 Reagent name	体积分数 Volume fraction/%	剂型 Dosage form	生产商 Manufacturer
腈菌唑 Myclobutanil	25	乳油 EC	山东曹达化工有限公司Shandong Caoda Chemical Co., Ltd
多菌灵 Carbendazim	50	可湿性粉剂WP	山东鑫星农药有限公司Shandong Xinxing Pesticide Co., Ltd
嘧菌酯 Azoxystrobin	25	悬浮剂SC	盐城利民农化有限公司Yancheng Limin Agrochemical Co., Ltd
代森锰锌 Mancozeb	80	可湿性粉剂WP	济南农化工有限公司Jinan Agricultural Chemical Co., Ltd
中生菌素 Mesosporin	3	可湿性粉剂WP	福建凯立生物制品有限公司Fujian Kaili Biological Products Co., Ltd
福美双 Thiram	50	可湿性粉剂WP	济南农化工有限公司Jinan Agricultural Chemical Co., Ltd

药剂名称 Reagent name	体积分数 Volume fraction/%	剂型 Dosage form	生产商 Manufacturer
腈菌唑 Myclobutanil	25	乳油 EC	山东曹达化工有限公司Shandong Caoda Chemical Co., Ltd
多菌灵 Carbendazim	50	可湿性粉剂WP	山东鑫星农药有限公司Shandong Xinxing Pesticide Co., Ltd
嘧菌酯 Azoxystrobin	25	悬浮剂SC	盐城利民农化有限公司Yancheng Limin Agrochemical Co., Ltd
代森锰锌 Mancozeb	80	可湿性粉剂WP	济南农化工有限公司Jinan Agricultural Chemical Co., Ltd
中生菌素 Mesosporin	3	可湿性粉剂WP	福建凯立生物制品有限公司Fujian Kaili Biological Products Co., Ltd
福美双 Thiram	50	可湿性粉剂WP	济南农化工有限公司Jinan Agricultural Chemical Co., Ltd

药剂名称Reagent name	质量浓度Mass concentration/(g·L^-1)
腈菌唑 Myclobutanil	0.100	0.125	0.167	0.250	0.500
多菌灵 Carbendazim	0.100	0.125	0.167	0.250	0.500
嘧菌酯 Azoxystrobin	0.333	0.417	0.556	0.833	1.667
代森锰锌 Mancozeb	0.400	0.500	0.667	1.000	2.000
中生菌素 Mesosporin	0.333	0.417	0.556	0.833	1.667
福美双 Thiram	0.400	0.500	0.667	1.000	2.000

药剂名称Reagent name	质量浓度Mass concentration/(g·L^-1)
腈菌唑 Myclobutanil	0.100	0.125	0.167	0.250	0.500
多菌灵 Carbendazim	0.100	0.125	0.167	0.250	0.500
嘧菌酯 Azoxystrobin	0.333	0.417	0.556	0.833	1.667
代森锰锌 Mancozeb	0.400	0.500	0.667	1.000	2.000
中生菌素 Mesosporin	0.333	0.417	0.556	0.833	1.667
福美双 Thiram	0.400	0.500	0.667	1.000	2.000

试剂名称 Reagent name	回归方程 Regression equation	相关系数 R²	EC₅₀/ (g·L^-1)
腈菌唑 Myclobutanil	y=0.515x+6.177	0.683	0.005 2
多菌灵 Carbendazim	y=3.743x+10.152	0.812	0.042 0
嘧菌酯 Azoxystrobin	y=0.287x+4.932	0.911	1.725 4
代森锰锌 Mancozeb	y=1.732x+5.589	0.853	0.457 0
中生菌素 Mesosporin	y=1.260x+4.858	0.881	1.296 3
福美双 Thiram	y=3.667x+7.008	0.721	0.283 4

Pathogen identification and indoor toxicity tests on root rot of Codonopsis pilosula

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 8

References 23

Related Articles 10

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

药剂名称 Reagent name	回归方程 Regression equation	相关系数 R²	EC₅₀/ (g·L^-1)
腈菌唑 Myclobutanil	y=0.695x+6.071	0.937	0.028 7
多菌灵 Carbendazim	y=0.888x+7.226	0.981	0.003 1
嘧菌酯 Azoxystrobin	y=0.656x+6.213	0.898	0.014 2
代森锰锌 Mancozeb	y=4.832x+6.918	0.926	0.400 9
中生菌素 Mesosporin	y=0.759x+5.975	0.958	0.051 9
福美双 Thiram	y=0.421x+5.866	0.911	0.008 8

[1]	DENG Yulian, TAN Lin, NIU Li, LU Qiancheng, ZHOU Linghong, LI Guihua, HU Qiulong. Screening and identification of an antagonistic fungus strain against root rot disease in tea plants and its biological characteristics [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(7): 1469-1480.
[2]	SHEN Lan, YANG Xiaofang, ZHANG Guofang. Identification and fungicide sensitivity of the pathogen causing root rot on strawberry [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(2): 417-425.
[3]	LI Yani, CHEN Weiliang, MAO Bizeng. Pathogen identification of root rot of Curcuma wenyujin [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(5): 1086-1093.
[4]	JI Songyan, SHAO Changqi, QI Wenkang, HE Yuhui, ZHANG Xin, WANG Cuiping. Identification of Lycium barbarum root rot disease pathogens and biocontrol funguses against root rot disease [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(10): 2283-2297.
[5]	HOU Caixia, DING Dedong, HE Jing, ZHAO Jitao, LI Yanxiang, ZHAO Qian, ZHANG Chongqing, LI Nan. Screening, identification and biocontrol effect of endophytic fungus from Lycium barbarum [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(7): 1662-1671.
[6]	LUO Qinchuan, TANG Wei, MA Jukui, CHEN Jingwei, YANG Dongjing, GAO Fangyuan, SUN Houjun, XIE Yiping, ZHANG Chengling. Transcriptomic analysis of Fusarium solani infecting sweetpotato [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(5): 1097-1107.
[7]	HUANG Wanyuan, LI Caibin, PENG Yu, LI Zhanghai, HUANG Yanzhang, DING Ting. Studies on isolation and identification of antagonistic bacteria against tobacco root black rot pathogen, Thielaviopsis basicola and their biocontrol characteristics [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(4): 873-883.
[8]	YANG Xiujuan, LI Weiya, LI Caimiao, CHENG Bijun, GAO Fen, ZHAO Jun. Antifungal effect of Camellia seed cake on root rot pathogens of Astragalus membranaceus and Panax notoginseng [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(6): 1227-1235.
[9]	ZHANG Xiaoyan, HE Jing, HOU Caixia, ZHANG Shuheng. Screening and identification of antagonistic strains of wolfberry root rot [J]. , 2020, 32(5): 858-865.
[10]	LIU Shu-juan;CHEN Xiu-rong;*;YUAN Hong-bo. Identification and isolation of root rot pathogen of Cucuminum cyminum L． [J]. , 2012, 24(3): 0-485.