Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis ›› 2022, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (10): 2182-2187.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2022.10.12
• Horticultural Science • Previous Articles Next Articles
WAN Xiao(
), TIAN Danqing(
), PAN Xiaoyun, PAN Gangmin, GE Yaying, ZHOU Yuan, XIE Lupeng, ZHU Qiang
Received:2021-03-01
Online:2022-10-25
Published:2022-10-26
Contact:
TIAN Danqing
CLC Number:
WAN Xiao, TIAN Danqing, PAN Xiaoyun, PAN Gangmin, GE Yaying, ZHOU Yuan, XIE Lupeng, ZHU Qiang. Physiological characteristics and sucrose treatment of Anthurium at different developmental stages[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(10): 2182-2187.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.zjnyxb.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2022.10.12
| 时期 Stage | 外观描述 Appearance description | 生长重点 Key project |
|---|---|---|
| T1 | 新叶和花芽尚未钻出鳞叶(现蕾期),此时花芽呈白色 The new leaves and flower buds have not yet drilled out of the scale leaf(squaring stage), and the flower buds are white at this time | 叶芽从鳞叶中钻出,叶柄伸长,叶片面积增加,叶片平展 The leaf bud is drilling out of the scale leaf; the leaf petiole is elongating; the leaf area is increasing, and the leaf blade is flating |
| T2 | 花芽尚未钻出对应叶片基部的托叶(孕蕾期) Stipules that have not yet emerged from the base of the corresponding leaf (bud pregnant stage) | 叶片面积增大,叶片加厚,花芽钻出托叶,花芽色素开始合成 Leaf area and thickness is increasing; flower buds is drilling out of the stipule; flower pigment is begining to synthesize |
| T3 | 花芽从托叶钻出1/2左右;花朵的佛焰苞先端2/3呈红色 Flower bud have drilled out half of the stipules; the 2/3 front apex of spathe is red | 花芽的生长,花梗伸长,苞片面积增大,叶片蜡质增厚 Flower bud growth. Pedicel elongated, bract area enlarged, leaf waxy thickened |
| T4 | 佛焰苞卷曲,花柄为叶柄一半长 The spathe is still curly; the flower petiole length is half of the leaf | 花梗伸长,苞片开展,面积增大 The flower pedicel is elongating; the spathe is flating; the spathe area is increasing |
| T5 | 佛焰苞完全打开,肉穗花序先端黄色占1/3,此时为最佳观赏期 The spathe is fully open, 1/3 apex of the spadix is yellow;this stage is the best viewing period | 种子成熟 The seed is maturing |
Table 1 Phenotypic observation of Anthurium at different developmental stages
| 时期 Stage | 外观描述 Appearance description | 生长重点 Key project |
|---|---|---|
| T1 | 新叶和花芽尚未钻出鳞叶(现蕾期),此时花芽呈白色 The new leaves and flower buds have not yet drilled out of the scale leaf(squaring stage), and the flower buds are white at this time | 叶芽从鳞叶中钻出,叶柄伸长,叶片面积增加,叶片平展 The leaf bud is drilling out of the scale leaf; the leaf petiole is elongating; the leaf area is increasing, and the leaf blade is flating |
| T2 | 花芽尚未钻出对应叶片基部的托叶(孕蕾期) Stipules that have not yet emerged from the base of the corresponding leaf (bud pregnant stage) | 叶片面积增大,叶片加厚,花芽钻出托叶,花芽色素开始合成 Leaf area and thickness is increasing; flower buds is drilling out of the stipule; flower pigment is begining to synthesize |
| T3 | 花芽从托叶钻出1/2左右;花朵的佛焰苞先端2/3呈红色 Flower bud have drilled out half of the stipules; the 2/3 front apex of spathe is red | 花芽的生长,花梗伸长,苞片面积增大,叶片蜡质增厚 Flower bud growth. Pedicel elongated, bract area enlarged, leaf waxy thickened |
| T4 | 佛焰苞卷曲,花柄为叶柄一半长 The spathe is still curly; the flower petiole length is half of the leaf | 花梗伸长,苞片开展,面积增大 The flower pedicel is elongating; the spathe is flating; the spathe area is increasing |
| T5 | 佛焰苞完全打开,肉穗花序先端黄色占1/3,此时为最佳观赏期 The spathe is fully open, 1/3 apex of the spadix is yellow;this stage is the best viewing period | 种子成熟 The seed is maturing |
| 时期 Stage | 发育到下一时期 天数Duration of each stage/d | 叶柄长 Petiole length/cm | 叶长 Leaf length/cm | 叶宽 Leaf width/cm | 花梗长 Pedicel length/cm | 苞片长 Bract length/cm | 苞片宽 Bract width/cm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | 55.25±4.11 | 10.43±0.21 | |||||
| T2 | 55.50±4.20 | 17.53±2.35 | 7.93±0.67 | 6.83±0.35 | |||
| T3 | 35.00±1.41 | 22.30±1.8 | 17.07±0.45 | 12.23±0.15 | |||
| T4 | 58.75±2.22 | 25.2±0.53 | 17.10±0.46 | 12.23±0.15 | 13.63±1.21 | 7.17±0.25 | |
| T5 | 28.47±0.60 | 17.23±0.31 | 12.23±0.15 | 29.37±0.95 | 9.07±0.21 | 9.60±0.26 |
Table 2 The development state of leaf and spathe at different developmental stages of Anthurium
| 时期 Stage | 发育到下一时期 天数Duration of each stage/d | 叶柄长 Petiole length/cm | 叶长 Leaf length/cm | 叶宽 Leaf width/cm | 花梗长 Pedicel length/cm | 苞片长 Bract length/cm | 苞片宽 Bract width/cm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | 55.25±4.11 | 10.43±0.21 | |||||
| T2 | 55.50±4.20 | 17.53±2.35 | 7.93±0.67 | 6.83±0.35 | |||
| T3 | 35.00±1.41 | 22.30±1.8 | 17.07±0.45 | 12.23±0.15 | |||
| T4 | 58.75±2.22 | 25.2±0.53 | 17.10±0.46 | 12.23±0.15 | 13.63±1.21 | 7.17±0.25 | |
| T5 | 28.47±0.60 | 17.23±0.31 | 12.23±0.15 | 29.37±0.95 | 9.07±0.21 | 9.60±0.26 |
Fig.1 Net photosynthetic rate of Anthurium at different developmental stages The treatments with different lowercase letters showed significant difference (P<0.05). The same as below.
Fig.2 TPS activity of Anthurium in different development stages* and ** represented the significant difference at the level of 0.05 and 0.01, respectively.
Fig.3 Induction of Anthurium flower buds by different concentrations of sucrose solution A, The percentage of flower pedicel>5 cm; B, The percentage of 1 cm≤flower pedicel≤5 cm; C, The percentage of flower pedicel<1 cm; D, The percentage of flower pedicel without drilling out of the scale leaf; E, The percentage of flower bud emergency.
| [1] |
DAI J W, PAULL R E. The role of leaf development on Anthurium flower growth[J]. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 1990, 115(6): 901-905.
DOI URL |
| [2] | 常娟霞. 红掌CO和FT类基因的克隆与分析[D]. 海口: 海南大学, 2014. |
| CHANG J X. Cloning and analysis of CO and FT gene in Anthurium andraeanum[D]. Haikou: Hainan University, 2014. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [3] |
DUFOUR L, GUÉRIN V. Growth, developmental features and flower production of Anthurium andreanum Lind. in tropical conditions[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2003, 98(1): 25-35.
DOI URL |
| [4] |
IORDACHESCU M, IMAI R. Trehalose biosynthesis in response to abiotic stresses[J]. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 2008, 50(10): 1223-1229.
DOI |
| [5] |
GRIFFITHS C A, PAUL M J, FOYER C H. Metabolite transport and associated sugar signalling systems underpinning source/sink interactions[J]. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Bioenergetics, 2016, 1857(10): 1715-1725.
DOI PMID |
| [6] | PAUL M J, JHURREEA D, ZHANG Y H, et al. Up-regulation of biosynthetic processes associated with growth by trehalose 6-phosphate[J]. Plant Signaling & Behavior, 2010, 5(4): 386-392. |
| [7] | SCHLUEPMANN H, PELLNY T, VAN DIJKEN A, et al. Trehalose 6-phosphate is indispensable for carbohydrate utilization and growth in Arabidopsis thaliana[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2003, 100(11): 6849-6854. |
| [8] |
OSZVALD M, PRIMAVESI L F, GRIFFITHS C A, et al. Trehalose 6-phosphate regulates photosynthesis and assimilate partitioning in reproductive tissue[J]. Plant Physiology, 2018, 176(4): 2623-2638.
DOI PMID |
| [9] |
MARTINS M C M, HEJAZI M, FETTKE J, et al. Feedback inhibition of starch degradation in Arabidopsis leaves mediated by trehalose 6-phosphate[J]. Plant Physiology, 2013, 163(3): 1142-1163.
DOI URL |
| [10] |
PAUL M J, GONZALEZ-URIARTE A, GRIFFITHS C A, et al. The role of trehalose 6-phosphate in crop yield and resilience[J]. Plant Physiology, 2018, 177(1): 12-23.
DOI PMID |
| [11] | 韩明玉, 杜利莎, 邢利博, 等. 一种促进苹果花芽孕育的蔗糖喷施方法: CN106212012A[P]. 2016-12-14. |
| [12] | 蒋甲福, 王恒, 陈发棣, 等. 一种蔗糖处理促进菊花开花的方法: CN105766409B[P]. 2019-08-23. |
| [13] | 张晓, 任惠惠, 曹婧, 等. 弱光导致荷花花芽败育的机制探析[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2019, 42(6): 1040-1049. |
| ZHANG X, REN H H, CAO J, et al. Analysis of the mechanism of Lotus flower bud abortion caused by low light[J]. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University, 2019, 42(6): 1040-1049. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [14] |
NUCCIO M L, WU J, MOWERS R, et al. Expression of trehalose-6-phosphate phosphatase in maize ears improves yield in well-watered and drought conditions[J]. Nature Biotechnology, 2015, 33(8): 862-869.
PMID |
| [15] | 彭丽丽, 姜卫兵, 韩健. 源库关系变化对果树产量及果实品质的影响[J]. 经济林研究, 2012, 30(3): 134-140. |
| PENG L L, JIANG W B, HAN J. Effects of source-sink relationship change on yield and quality in fruit tree[J]. Nonwood Forest Research, 2012, 30(3): 134-140. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [16] | 徐迎春, 李绍华, 柴成林, 等. 水分胁迫期间及胁迫解除后苹果树源叶碳同化物代谢规律的研究[J]. 果树学报, 2001, 18(1): 1-6. |
| XU Y C, LI S H, CHAI C L, et al. Carbohydrate metabolism in source leaves of jonagold apple tree under water stress and after water stress relief[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2001, 18(1): 1-6. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [17] | 方金豹, 田莉莉, 陈锦永, 等. 猕猴桃源库关系的变化对果实特性的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2002, 29(2): 113-118. |
| FANG J B, TIAN L L, CHEN J Y, et al. Influence of sink or source change on fruit characteristics in kiwifruit[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2002, 29(2): 113-118. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [18] |
ZHANG Y, XU W G, WANG H W, et al. Progress in genetic improvement of grain yield and related physiological traits of Chinese wheat in Henan Province[J]. Field Crops Research, 2016, 199: 117-128.
DOI URL |
| [19] |
KHAN S U, GURMANI A R, DIN J U, et al. Exogenously applied gibberellic acid, indole acetic acid and kinetin as potential regulators of source-sink relationship, physiological and yield attributes in rice (Oryza sativa) genotypes under water deficit conditions[J]. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 2015, 18(1): 139-145.
DOI URL |
| [20] |
MA Y T, CHEN Y J, ZHU J Y, et al. Coupling individual kernel-filling processes with source-sink interactions into GREENLAB-maize[J]. Annals of Botany, 2018, 121(5): 961-973.
DOI PMID |
| [21] |
ZHANG Z P, DENG Y K, SONG X X, et al. Trehalose-6-phosphate and SNF1-related protein kinase 1 are involved in the first-fruit inhibition of cucumber[J]. Journal of Plant Physiology, 2015, 177: 110-120.
DOI PMID |
| [22] |
SCHWACHTJE J, MINCHIN P E H, JAHNKE S, et al. SNF1-related kinases allow plants to tolerate herbivory by allocating carbon to roots[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006, 103(34): 12935-12940.
DOI PMID |
| [23] |
WAHL V, PONNU J, SCHLERETH A, et al. Regulation of flowering by trehalose-6-phosphate signaling in Arabidopsis thaliana[J]. Science, 2013, 339(6120): 704-707.
DOI URL |
| [24] |
PAUL M J, PRIMAVESI L F, JHURREEA D, et al. Trehalose metabolism and signaling[J]. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2008, 59: 417-441.
DOI PMID |
| [25] |
DIJKEN A J H V, SCHLUEPMANN H, SMEEKENS S C M. Arabidopsis trehalose-6-phosphate synthase 1 is essential for normal vegetative growth and transition to flowering[J]. Plant Physiology, 2004, 135(2): 969-977.
DOI URL |
| [26] | 牛俊海, 常娟霞, 杨光穗, 等. 红掌CONSTANS类基因AaCOL1和AaCOL2的克隆与表达分析[J]. 分子植物育种, 2014, 12(6): 1222-1229. |
| NIU J H, CHANG J X, YANG G S, et al. Molecular cloning and expression analysis of CONSTANS-like genes, AaCOL1 and AaCOL2 of Anthurium andraeanum[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2014, 12(6): 1222-1229. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [1] | SHOU Weisong, WANG Duo, SHEN Jia, XU Xinyang, ZHANG Yuejian, HE Yanjun. Identification and expression analysis of sucrose transporter SUT family in watermelon in fruit development and stress responses [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(1): 94-102. |
| [2] | LI Xiaoxia, LI Dan, LI Wanxing, JIN Kunpeng, LIU Yongzhong, HAN Wenqing, HUANG Xuefang, LIU Xin, TIAN Gang, CAO Jinjun. Effects of different rotation patterns on physiological characteristics, yield and quality of foxtail millet during grain filling stage [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(7): 1499-1510. |
| [3] | LIANG Chenggang, WANG Yan, GUAN Zhixiu, WEI Chunyu, DENG Jiao, HUANG Juan, MENG Ziye, SHI Taoxiong. Identification and bioinformatics analysis of sucrose transporter family FtSUCs in Tartary buckwheat [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(8): 1591-1598. |
| [4] | LYU Shufang, ZHANG Hongxiao, XU Huawei, ZHAO Xingli. Analysis of GhSuSy expression by particle bombardment during initiation of cotton fibers [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(7): 1361-1368. |
| [5] | YANG Xiaofang, LI Yunduan, SUN Yunfan, LI Shaojia, MIAO Lixiang, ZHANG Yuchao, JIANG Guihua. Influence of substrate cultivation and soil cultivation on sucrose and citric acid accumulation of Yuexin strawberry [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(7): 1423-1430. |
| [6] | ZHANG Weimei, ZHANG Guwen, FENG Zhijuan, LIU Na, WANG Bin, BU Yuanpeng. Research progress on genetic and regulatory mechanisms of sucrose in vegetable soybean seeds [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(12): 2446-2456. |
| [7] | JIN Weiwei, CHEN Gongkai*, ZHU Jianjun, GAO Ailing. Gene clone, sequence analysis and gene expression of NIN and Sus from Ougan fruit [J]. , 2016, 28(5): 782-. |
| [8] | LI Qiaozi1,GAO Suping2,*,ZHANG Keyan1,CHEN Feng1,DUAN Jingjing1,CAI Xinyi1. Effects of exogenous nitric oxide on growth and polysaccharide accumulation of protocormlike bodies from Dendrobium officinale [J]. , 2016, 28(4): 595-. |
| [9] | CHE Yang, ZHAO Chun\|tian, QIU Juan\|ping. Effect of carbon sources on moenomycin biosynthesis in Streptomyces ghanaensis#br# [J]. , 2015, 27(8): 1355-. |
| [10] | WANG Bingliang,FANG Tingting,YE Hongxia*,SHI Yu. Effect of cultivation methods on photosynthetic rate,yield and quality of Hami melon (Cucumis melo var. saccharinus) [J]. , 2014, 26(4): 896-. |
| [11] | CHEN Binghong1,2, TANG Weihua1,YING Junhui1, LI Qiuping2,WANG Dongming1,PAN Xiyu1,CHAI Hongling1. Effects of zeolite medium on growth of Thuidium cymbifolium gametophyte#br# [J]. , 2014, 26(4): 948-. |
| [12] | ZHENG Ning;MA Jia-wei;WANG Xyu-dong;YE Zheng-qian;LI Tian-zhu;MAO Qi;WU Xiao-hua. Effects of combinations of fungi residue and chemical fertilizer on photosynthesis characteristics of flag leaf and grain yield in rice [J]. , 2013, 25(3): 0-608. |
| [13] | XIE Xiaobo;QI Xingjiang;*;JIN Wei;XIANG Kanghua;CHEN Weili;LIANG Senmiao;ZHENG Xiliang;QIU Yingying;HE Huan. Accumulation of fruit sugar components and activities analyzing of sucrose metabolizing enzymes during fruit development of red bayberry [J]. , 2013, 25(1): 0-52. |
| [14] | ZHANG Guwen;HU Qizan;XYU Shengchun;GONG Yaming*. Study on sucrose accumulation and enzyme activities involved in sucrose metabolism in developing seeds of vegetable soybean [J]. , 2012, 24(6): 0-1020. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||