褪黑素预处理对桃耐涝性的调控效应

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2022.09.10

浙江农业学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (9): 1911-1924.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2022.09.10

褪黑素预处理对桃耐涝性的调控效应

古咸彬(), 陆玲鸿, 宋根华, 肖金平, 张慧琴()

浙江省农业科学院园艺研究所,浙江杭州 310021

收稿日期:2021-11-24 出版日期:2022-09-25 发布日期:2022-09-30
通讯作者: 张慧琴
作者简介:*张慧琴,E-mail: zhqzaas@163.com
古咸彬(1988—),男,重庆江津人,博士,助理研究员,主要从事果树抗逆育种与分子生物学研究。E-mail: xbgu_8810@163.com
基金资助:
浙江省自然科学基金(LQ19C150003);国家自然科学基金(32102316);浙江省农业(果品)新品种选育重大科技专项(2021C02066-4);国家现代农业产业技术体系(CARS-30-Z-06)

Regulation effect of melatonin pretreatment on waterlogging tolerance in peach seedling

GU Xianbin(), LU Linghong, SONG Genhua, XIAO Jinping, ZHANG Huiqin()

Institute of Horticulture, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310021, China

Received:2021-11-24 Online:2022-09-25 Published:2022-09-30
Contact: ZHANG Huiqin

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为探究褪黑素对桃耐涝性的调控效应,用200 μmol·L^-1褪黑素对桃苗进行预处理,再经涝害处理,通过生理指标与转录组分析褪黑素和涝害对桃的影响。结果表明,涝害胁迫下外源褪黑素能保护细胞膜和根系。褪黑素能激活微管形态建成、氧化还原酶活性和蛋白结合相关的基因,巩固根系骨架,激活抗氧化酶活性,提高抗逆性。涝害诱导ERF转录因子家族成员大量表达,通过HRPE和GCC-box顺式作用元件激活下游ADH、ALD、GAPD等糖酵解途径关键酶基因的表达,为低氧胁迫下的植株供能。ERF Ⅶ成员Prupe.8G264900可能是桃响应涝害的关键基因。

关键词: 桃, 褪黑素, 涝害, 转录组

Abstract:

In order to explore the regulation effect of melatonin on waterlogging tolerance in peach, peach seedlings were pretreated with 200 μmol·L^-1 melatonin and then subjected to waterlogging treatment. Physiological indexes and transcriptome sequencing were used to study the effects of melatonin on peach under waterlogging. The results showed that exogenous melatonin slowed chlorophyll degradation and protected cell membranes and roots of peach seedling. Melatonin activated microtubule morphogenesis, REDOX enzyme activity and protein-binding related genes, thus consolidated root skeleton, activated antioxidant enzyme activity and improved stress tolerance. Waterlogging induced abundant expression of ERF transcription factor family members to regulate stress response. All the VII group members of ERF family were significant differential expressed in the waterlogging response group, which could be the key member in hypoxia stress response reaction. In addition, ERF transcription factor activated the activity of key enzymes genes as ADH, ALD, GAPD in glycolysis pathway through HRPE or GCC-box cis-acting elements, which provided energy for plants under hypoxic stress. Prupe.8G264900, a member of ERF Ⅶ, might be a key gene in response to waterlogging in peach.

Key words: peach, melatonin, waterlogging, transcriptome

中图分类号:

S662.1

古咸彬, 陆玲鸿, 宋根华, 肖金平, 张慧琴. 褪黑素预处理对桃耐涝性的调控效应[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(9): 1911-1924.

GU Xianbin, LU Linghong, SONG Genhua, XIAO Jinping, ZHANG Huiqin. Regulation effect of melatonin pretreatment on waterlogging tolerance in peach seedling[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(9): 1911-1924.

图/表 12

表1 荧光定量PCR引物

Table 1 Primers for qRT-PCR

基因序列号 Gene ID	基因名称 Gene name	上游引物 Forward primer (5'→3')	下游引物 Reverse primer (5'→3')	产物长度 Products lenth/bp
Prupe.1G234000	PpGAPDH	CTGCTTCCTTCAACATCAT	TGCCTTCTTCTCAATCCT	158
Prupe.1G305900	PpRAV	TTCAGATGGTTCGGCTATT	TCCTTGGCTTCTTGCTAA	183
Prupe.2G258200	PpERD15	GAGGAAGAGGAGAAGGATT	CGGACTCACTTTCATCAC	138
Prupe.2G272300	PpERF1	CGGATGCTTCAACAACAA	TACTGGTCTTCTGCCTTG	111
Prupe.3G236200	PpLBD41	GGATGAGTTGTAATGGATG	CCTCGTATAGCAATGATC	213
Prupe.6G230600	PpWRKY7	CAGGTGTCTTCAGTTGGA	AGAGTAATCATCAGGTGGAA	207
Prupe.8G018100	PpADH1	GGAGTGATGCTGAGTGAT	CAGACCTGTGGAGATACC	183
Prupe.8G264900	PpERF071	CCTCCAATTCCAATTCCAA	GCAATCGCATCCTTATTCA	226
Prupe.6G163400	PpACTIN	TCTTCCAACCATCACTCAT	GCCACAACCTTAATCTTCAT	211

图1 淹水处理后桃生理指标的变化利用SPSS Statistics 17.0软件进行显著性差异分析,One-way ANOVA用于显著性检验,Duncan法进行多重比较。柱上无相同小写字母表示差异显著(P<0.05)。

Fig.1 Physiological indexes changes of peach after waterlogging treatment SPSS Statistics 17.0 software was used for significant difference analysis, one-way ANOVA was used for significance test, Duncan method was used for multiple comparison. Data on the bars marked without the same lowercase letter indicated significant differences at P<0.05.

图2 组间差异表达基因的统计分析

Fig.2 Number statistics of differentially expressed genes in groups

图3 褪黑素诱导富集的GO通路 A,GO富集分析;B,差异基因的表达热图。

Fig.3 Enrichment of the GO items induced by melatonin A, GO enrichment analysis; B, Heat map of differential gene expression.

图4 共同差异表达基因的GO富集分析与表达热图分析 A,组间比较Venn图;B,GO富集分析;C,差异基因的表达热图。

Fig.4 GO enrich and expression analysis of common differentially expressed genes A, Venn diagram between groups; B, GO enrichment analysis; C, Heat map of different expression gene.

表2 GO显著富集通路中差异表达的转录因子

Table 2 Different expressed transcription factors in the most enrich GO pathway

转录因子家族 TF family	数量 Number	转录因子家族 TF family	数量 Number
AP2/ERF	34	HD-ZIP	3
WRKY	23	NF-YA	3
bZIP	15	ARR-B	2
HSF	12	BES1	2
C2C2-GATA	4	NF-X1	1
MADS	4	SBP	1
AT-hook	3	Trihelix	1

图5 桃和拟南芥ERF家族进化树分析

Fig.5 Phylogenetic tree analysis of ERF family in peach and Arabidopsis thaliana

表3 桃ERF转录因子家族成员差异表达基因分布

Table 3 Different expressed ERFs in each subfamily group

ERF家族 ERF family	数量 Number	百分比 Percentage/%	ERF家族 ERF family	数量 Number	百分比 Percentage/%
Ⅰ	1/6	16.7	Ⅶ	3/3	100
Ⅱ	1/8	12.5	Ⅷ	3/10	30
Ⅲ	5/22	22.7	Ⅸ	12/20	60
Ⅳ	2/7	28.6	Ⅹ	2/6	33.3
Ⅴ	0/12	0	Ⅺ-L	0/2	0
Ⅵ	0/6	0

图6 差异表达的ERF成员的FPKM统计

Fig.6 FPKM number of different expressed ERF family members

图7 KEGG富集分析及ERF靶基因预测 A,KEGG富集气泡图;B,糖酵解途径与合成酶基因的表达热图;C,ERF靶基因预测。

Fig.7 KEGG pathway enrichment analysis and ERF transcription factor target gene prediction A, KEGG enrichment analysis; B, Expression heat map of glycolysis pathway genes; C, ERF target gene prediction.

图8 差异表达基因的荧光定量表达验证

Fig.8 qRT-PCR validation of relative expression levels of differential expressed genes

图9 桃响应涝害调控网络图

Fig.9 Hypothesized regulatory mechanism for melatonin in the waterlogging response pathway

参考文献 28

[1]	ANDERSEN P, LOMBARD P, WESTWOOD M N. Leaf conductance, growth, and survival of willow and deciduous fruit tree species under flooded soil conditions[J]. Journal of The American Society for Horticultural Science, 1984, 109(2): 132-138. DOI URL
[2]	郁万文, 蔡金峰, 高长忠. 不同桃砧类型对淹水胁迫的生理响应及耐涝性评价[J]. 中国果树, 2016(3): 1-6.
	YU W W, CAI J F, GAO C Z. Physiological responses of different peach rootstocks to submergence stress and their waterlogging tolerance evaluation[J]. China Fruits, 2016(3): 1-6. (in Chinese)
[3]	WU X L, TANG Y L, LI C S, et al. Individual and combined effects of soil waterlogging and compaction on physiological characteristics of wheat in southwestern China[J]. Field Crops Research, 2018, 215: 163-172. DOI URL
[4]	聂功平, 陈敏敏, 杨柳燕, 等. 植物响应淹水胁迫的研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(18): 57-64.
	NIE G P, CHEN M M, YANG L Y, et al. Plant response to waterlogging stress: research progress[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(18): 57-64. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]	刘周斌, 周宇健, 杨博智, 等. 植物抗涝性研究进展[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2015, 54(18): 4385-4389, 4393.
	LIU Z B, ZHOU Y J, YANG B Z, et al. Research progress in waterlogging of plant[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 54(18): 4385-4389, 4393. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]	SALAH A, ZHAN M, CAO C G, et al. γ-aminobutyric acid promotes chloroplast ultrastructure, antioxidant capacity, and growth of waterlogged maize seedlings[J]. Scientific Reports, 2019, 9(1): 484. DOI PMID
[7]	王蕊, 杨小龙, 须晖, 等. 高等植物褪黑素的合成和代谢研究进展[J]. 植物生理学报, 2016, 52(5): 615-627.
	WANG R, YANG X L, XU H, et al. Research progress of melatonin biosynthesis and metabolism in higher plants[J]. Plant Physiology Journal, 2016, 52(5): 615-627. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	ARNAO M B, HERNÁNDEZ-RUIZ J. Melatonin: a new plant hormone and/or a plant master regulator?[J]. Trends in Plant Science, 2019, 24(1): 38-48. DOI PMID
[9]	WANG Y P, REITER R J, CHAN Z L. Phytomelatonin: a universal abiotic stress regulator[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2017, 69(5): 963-974. DOI URL
[10]	吴燕, 乔晓燕, 葛伟强, 等. 高温强光下外源褪黑素对栝楼雌花生理生化特性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(3): 421-429. DOI
	WU Y, QIAO X Y, GE W Q, et al. Effects of exogenous melatonin on physiological and biochemical characteristics in female flowers of Trichosanthes kirilowii under high temperature and strong light[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2020, 32(3): 421-429. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]	ZHENG X D, ZHOU J Z, TAN D X, et al. Melatonin improves waterlogging tolerance of Malus baccata(Linn.) Borkh. seedlings by maintaining aerobic respiration, photosynthesis and ROS migration[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2017, 8: 483.
[12]	ZHANG R D, YUE Z X, CHEN X F, et al. Foliar applications of urea and melatonin to alleviate waterlogging stress on photosynthesis and antioxidant metabolism in sorghum seedlings[J]. Plant Growth Regulation, 2022, 97(2): 429-438. DOI URL
[13]	GU X B, XUE L, LU L H, et al. Melatonin enhances the waterlogging tolerance of Prunus persica by modulating antioxidant metabolism and anaerobic respiration[J]. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 2021, 40(5): 2178-2190. DOI URL
[14]	赵婷, 李琴, 潘学军, 等. 陆生植物对淹水胁迫的适应机制[J]. 植物生理学报, 2021, 57(11): 2091-2103.
	ZHAO T, LI Q, PAN X J, et al. Adaptive mechanism of terrestrial plants to waterlogging stress[J]. Plant Physiology Journal, 2021, 57(11): 2091-2103. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]	ALTAF M A, SHAHID R, REN M X, et al. Phytomelatonin: an overview of the importance and mediating functions of melatonin against environmental stresses[J]. Physiologia Plantarum, 2021, 172(2): 820-846. DOI URL
[16]	韩国民, 刘茜, 唐美玲, 等. 外源褪黑素对NaCl胁迫下5BB葡萄叶片生理特性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(4): 556-564. DOI
	HAN G M, LIU X, TANG M L, et al. Effects of exogenous melatonin on physiological characteristics of 5BB grape leaves under NaCl stress[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2019, 31(4): 556-564. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI
[17]	陈东, 李强, 彭彦, 等. 淹水胁迫下褪黑素浸种对水稻幼苗生长的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2019, 34(3): 129-136. DOI
	CHEN D, LI Q, PENG Y, et al. Effect of melatonin on rice seedling growth under submergence stress[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2019, 34(3): 129-136. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI
[18]	张明聪, 何松榆, 秦彬, 等. 外源褪黑素对干旱胁迫下春大豆品种绥农26形态、光合生理及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(9): 1791-1805. DOI
	ZHANG M C, HE S Y, QIN B, et al. Effects of exogenous melatonin on morphology, photosynthetic physiology, and yield of spring soybean variety Suinong 26 under drought stress[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(9): 1791-1805. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]	WANG X, LI F, CHEN Z Y, et al. Proteomic analysis reveals the effects of melatonin on soybean root tips under flooding stress[J]. Journal of Proteomics, 2021, 232: 104064. DOI URL
[20]	李小兰, 张瑞, 郝兰兰, 等. 桃NAC家族基因生物信息学分析及其响应低温胁迫的表达特征[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(4): 766-780. DOI
	LI X L, ZHANG R, HAO L L, et al. Bioinformatics analysis of peach NAC gene family and its expression characteristics in response to low temperature stress[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(4): 766-780. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI
[21]	MOHANTY B. Promoter architecture and transcriptional regulation of genes upregulated in germination and coleoptile elongation of diverse rice genotypes tolerant to submergence[J]. Frontiers in Genetics, 2021, 12: 639654. DOI URL
[22]	YU F, TAN Z D, FANG T, et al. A comprehensive transcriptomics analysis reveals long non-coding RNA to be involved in the key metabolic pathway in response to waterlogging stress in maize[J]. Genes, 2020, 11(3): 267. DOI URL
[23]	NAKANO T, SUZUKI K, FUJIMURA T, et al. Genome-wide analysis of the ERF gene family in Arabidopsis and rice[J]. Plant Physiology, 2006, 140(2): 411-432. DOI URL
[24]	WEI X N, XU H J, RONG W, et al. Constitutive expression of a stabilized transcription factor group Ⅶ ethylene response factor enhances waterlogging tolerance in wheat without penalizing grain yield[J]. Plant, Cell & Environment, 2019, 42(5): 1471-1485.
[25]	PAN D L, WANG G, WANG T, et al. AdRAP2.3, a novel ethylene response factor Ⅶ from Actinidia deliciosa, enhances waterlogging resistance in transgenic tobacco through improving expression levels of PDC and ADH genes[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2019, 20(5): 1189. DOI URL
[26]	UMEDA M, UCHIMIYA H. Differential transcript levels of genes associated with glycolysis and alcohol fermentation in rice plants (Oryza sativa L.) under submergence stress[J]. Plant Physiology, 1994, 106(3): 1015-1022. DOI URL
[27]	KOMATSU S, YAMAGUCHI H, HITACHI K, et al. Proteomic and biochemical analyses of the mechanism of tolerance in mutant soybean responding to flooding stress[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2021, 22(16): 9046. DOI URL
[28]	WEI W L, LI D H, WANG L H, et al. Morpho-anatomical and physiological responses to waterlogging of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.)[J]. Plant Science, 2013, 208: 102-111. DOI URL

编辑推荐

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

755

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	155	0	0	600

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	492	263
比例	65%	35%

摘要

503

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

0	0	503

	来源	本网站

	次数	503
	比例	100%

褪黑素预处理对桃耐涝性的调控效应

Regulation effect of melatonin pretreatment on waterlogging tolerance in peach seedling

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 12

参考文献 28

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	金宝霞, 王伟杰, 朱晓林, 王贤, 魏小红. 不同激素组合对番茄离体再生和相关基因表达的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(9): 1889-1900.
[2]	丁东霞, 李能慧, 李静, 唐超男, 王成, 牛天航, 杨滟, 杨海涛, 颉建明. 外源褪黑素对低温弱光胁迫下辣椒叶绿素荧光和抗氧化系统的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(9): 1935-1944.
[3]	邵宇辰, 穆宏磊, 陈杭君, 殷军艺, 房祥军, 吴伟杰, 刘瑞玲, 韩延超, 郜海燕. 肠道条件和粒径对加工山核桃体外消化的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(8): 1734-1742.
[4]	黄灵芝, 姜广泽, 丁艳菲, 朱诚. 核桃乳DNA提取方法优化与DNA条形码鉴定[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(8): 1752-1761.
[5]	王斯亮, 邵越, 闫成进. 草地贪夜蛾在玉米-小麦寄主转换中的转录组分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(6): 1236-1247.
[6]	李小兰, 张瑞, 郝兰兰, 王鸿. 桃NAC家族基因生物信息学分析及其响应低温胁迫的表达特征[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(4): 766-780.
[7]	刘晨, 徐浩博, 斯钰阳, 李亚鹏, 郭玉婷, 杜长霞. 基于转录组学的植物响应盐胁迫调控机制研究进展[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(4): 870-878.
[8]	王乾昆, 张小辉, 庞有志, 祁艳霞, 雷莹, 白俊艳, 户运奇, 赵毅威, 苑志文, 王涛. 基于RNA-seq技术挖掘鹌鹑羽色自别雌雄相关基因[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(3): 498-506.
[9]	兰国湘, 金思琪, 李星润, 刘喜雨, 李国美, 董新星. 高原雨点鸽与詹森鸽胸肌转录组差异表达基因筛选与功能分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(3): 507-516.
[10]	王慧茹, 李建设, 闫思华, 高艳明. 整枝方式对樱桃番茄冠层截获和荧光特性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(3): 525-533.
[11]	杨昕霞, 唐满生, 张斌. 大豆PP2C家族基因鉴定与响应盐胁迫的转录组分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(2): 207-220.
[12]	裴芸, 徐秀红, 陆锦彪, 陈阿敏, 张万萍. 151份贵州地方樱桃番茄资源的遗传多样性分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(2): 310-316.
[13]	杨生海, 刘西兰, 张勇. 利用加权基因共表达网络分析牛口蹄疫病毒感染通路变化[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(9): 1617-1624.
[14]	马杰, 屈雯, 陈春艳, 王磊, 马俊, 刘针杉, 马维, 周平, 何远宽, 孙勃. 基于转录组序列的叶用芥菜奶奶青菜EST-SSR标记开发与遗传多样性分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(9): 1640-1649.
[15]	黄长兵, 程培蕾, 杨绍宗, 张焕朝, 姜正之, 金立敏. 萱草根茎低温胁迫转录组分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(8): 1445-1460.