浙江农业学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (10): 2079-2087.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2022.10.01
张琪琪1,2(), 万映秀1,2, 曹文昕1,2, 李炎1,2, 刘方方1,2, 李耀1,2, 张平治1,2
收稿日期:
2021-08-20
出版日期:
2022-10-25
发布日期:
2022-10-26
作者简介:
张琪琪(1982—),女,安徽凤台人,硕士,助理研究员,主要从事小麦遗传育种与品质改良研究。E-mail: zhqq1982@126.com
基金资助:
ZHANG Qiqi1,2(), WAN Yingxiu1,2, CAO Wenxin1,2, LI Yan1,2, LIU Fangfang1,2, LI Yao1,2, ZHANG Pingzhi1,2
Received:
2021-08-20
Online:
2022-10-25
Published:
2022-10-26
摘要:
为准确掌握安徽省小麦品质状况,对品种布局进行探索性研究,特开展安徽省主产区小麦品质抽样、检测工作,对品质性状及区域、年度间差异进行分析和评价。结果表明:从单项指标的变异情况来看,容重达标比例最高,且区域间、年度间变异系数均较小;籽粒蛋白质含量、吸水率、硬度等指标均有58%以上的比例可以达到中强筋标准,籽粒蛋白质含量达到强筋的比例较低。综合指标中,达到中筋小麦标准的样品数量最多,达到优质中强筋以上标准的样品比例仅为13.7%,达到弱筋小麦标准的样品比例不足0.6%。各年度间达标样品数量以2019年最多。达到中强筋标准的样品主要集中在安徽省宿州市、阜阳市、亳州市和淮北市、滁州市等沿淮淮北麦区;达到弱筋小麦标准的样品分别来自阜南县和长丰县。
中图分类号:
张琪琪, 万映秀, 曹文昕, 李炎, 刘方方, 李耀, 张平治. 安徽省小麦品质性状分析与评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(10): 2079-2087.
ZHANG Qiqi, WAN Yingxiu, CAO Wenxin, LI Yan, LIU Fangfang, LI Yao, ZHANG Pingzhi. Analysis and evaluation of wheat quality traits in Anhui Province, China[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(10): 2079-2087.
市别 City | 数量 Quantity | 县(市、区)/份数 County (city, district)/Quantity |
---|---|---|
合肥市Hefei | 7 | 长丰县Changfeng/7 |
淮北市Huaibei | 27 | 濉溪县Suix/25、烈山区Lieshan/2 |
亳州市Bozhou | 53 | 谯城区Jiaocheng/13、蒙城县Mengcheng/20、涡阳县Woyang/9、利辛县Lixin/11 |
宿州市Suzhou | 70 | 灵璧县Lingbi/16、埇桥区Yongqiao/19、泗县Sixian/18、萧县Xiaoxian/9、砀山县Dangshan/8 |
阜阳市Fuyang | 57 | 太和县Taihe/13、临泉县Linquan/17、界首市Jieshou/2、阜南县Funan/9、颍上县Yingshang/4、颍泉区Yingquan/7、颍东区Yingdong/2、颍州区Yingzhou/3 |
蚌埠市Bengbu | 40 | 怀远县Huaiyuan/19、固镇县Guzhen/13、五河县Wuhe/8 |
滁州市Chuzhou | 43 | 天长市Tianchang/11、明光市Mingguang/10、凤阳县Fengyang/12、定远县Dingyuan/10 |
六安市Lu’an | 13 | 霍邱县Huoqiu/6、金安区Jin’an/4、裕安区Yu’an/3 |
淮南市Huainan | 26 | 凤台县Fengtai/12、潘集区Panji/5、寿县Shouxian/9 |
表1 安徽省小麦主产县(市、区)抽检样品分布
Table 1 Distribution of wheat samples from main wheat producing counties (cities, districts) in Anhui Province
市别 City | 数量 Quantity | 县(市、区)/份数 County (city, district)/Quantity |
---|---|---|
合肥市Hefei | 7 | 长丰县Changfeng/7 |
淮北市Huaibei | 27 | 濉溪县Suix/25、烈山区Lieshan/2 |
亳州市Bozhou | 53 | 谯城区Jiaocheng/13、蒙城县Mengcheng/20、涡阳县Woyang/9、利辛县Lixin/11 |
宿州市Suzhou | 70 | 灵璧县Lingbi/16、埇桥区Yongqiao/19、泗县Sixian/18、萧县Xiaoxian/9、砀山县Dangshan/8 |
阜阳市Fuyang | 57 | 太和县Taihe/13、临泉县Linquan/17、界首市Jieshou/2、阜南县Funan/9、颍上县Yingshang/4、颍泉区Yingquan/7、颍东区Yingdong/2、颍州区Yingzhou/3 |
蚌埠市Bengbu | 40 | 怀远县Huaiyuan/19、固镇县Guzhen/13、五河县Wuhe/8 |
滁州市Chuzhou | 43 | 天长市Tianchang/11、明光市Mingguang/10、凤阳县Fengyang/12、定远县Dingyuan/10 |
六安市Lu’an | 13 | 霍邱县Huoqiu/6、金安区Jin’an/4、裕安区Yu’an/3 |
淮南市Huainan | 26 | 凤台县Fengtai/12、潘集区Panji/5、寿县Shouxian/9 |
年度 Year | 总样品数 Total number of samples | 容重 Bulk density | 千粒重 Thousand kernel weight | 硬度指数 Hardness index | 蛋白质含量 Protein content | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
均值 Means/g | 变化范围 Range/g | CV/% | 均值 Means/g | 变化范围 Range/g | CV/% | 均值 Means | 变化范围 Range/g | CV/% | 均值 Means/% | 变化范围 Range/% | CV/% | ||
2011 | 80 | 796 | 756~830 | 2.2 | 39.6 | 31.5~50.3 | 9.5 | 50.1 | 15.9~74.0 | 33.5 | 13.6 | 10.1~17.1 | 8.5 |
2015 | 62 | 796 | 721~842 | 3.2 | 41.6 | 31.8~51.2 | 10.4 | 49.2 | 9.7~73.5 | 37.1 | 11.7 | 11.0~13.0 | 3.4 |
2016 | 56 | 781 | 711~825 | 3.5 | 38.9 | 32.2~45.5 | 8.5 | 48.2 | 10.4~73.8 | 36.9 | 13.6 | 11.5~16.0 | 8.2 |
2018 | 62 | 788 | 734~839 | 2.9 | 39.8 | 33.2~47.3 | 7.6 | 55.5 | 13.0~85.3 | 34.4 | 14.5 | 11.7~16.8 | 7.5 |
2019 | 76 | 807 | 755~849 | 2.6 | 43.4 | 36.1~49.9 | 7.1 | 55.3 | 16.0~80.0 | 31.3 | 13.6 | 9.1~17.0 | 9.6 |
平均 Average | 336 | 794 | 711~849 | 2.9 | 40.7 | 31.5~51.2 | 8.6 | 51.7 | 9.7~85.3 | 34.6 | 13.4 | 9.1~17.0 | 7.4 |
表2 安徽省小麦主产县(市、区)抽检样品籽粒品质性状
Table 2 Grain quality characters of wheat samples from main wheat producing counties (cities, districts) in Anhui Province
年度 Year | 总样品数 Total number of samples | 容重 Bulk density | 千粒重 Thousand kernel weight | 硬度指数 Hardness index | 蛋白质含量 Protein content | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
均值 Means/g | 变化范围 Range/g | CV/% | 均值 Means/g | 变化范围 Range/g | CV/% | 均值 Means | 变化范围 Range/g | CV/% | 均值 Means/% | 变化范围 Range/% | CV/% | ||
2011 | 80 | 796 | 756~830 | 2.2 | 39.6 | 31.5~50.3 | 9.5 | 50.1 | 15.9~74.0 | 33.5 | 13.6 | 10.1~17.1 | 8.5 |
2015 | 62 | 796 | 721~842 | 3.2 | 41.6 | 31.8~51.2 | 10.4 | 49.2 | 9.7~73.5 | 37.1 | 11.7 | 11.0~13.0 | 3.4 |
2016 | 56 | 781 | 711~825 | 3.5 | 38.9 | 32.2~45.5 | 8.5 | 48.2 | 10.4~73.8 | 36.9 | 13.6 | 11.5~16.0 | 8.2 |
2018 | 62 | 788 | 734~839 | 2.9 | 39.8 | 33.2~47.3 | 7.6 | 55.5 | 13.0~85.3 | 34.4 | 14.5 | 11.7~16.8 | 7.5 |
2019 | 76 | 807 | 755~849 | 2.6 | 43.4 | 36.1~49.9 | 7.1 | 55.3 | 16.0~80.0 | 31.3 | 13.6 | 9.1~17.0 | 9.6 |
平均 Average | 336 | 794 | 711~849 | 2.9 | 40.7 | 31.5~51.2 | 8.6 | 51.7 | 9.7~85.3 | 34.6 | 13.4 | 9.1~17.0 | 7.4 |
年度 Year | 湿面筋含量Wet gluten content/% | 吸水率 Water absorption/% | 稳定时间 Stability time | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
均值 Means | 变化范围 Range | CV | 均值 Means | 变化范围 Range | CV | 均值 Means/min | 变化范围 Range/min | CV/% | |
2011 | 30.9 | 16.0~41.9 | 14.6 | 57.7 | 50.1~67.8 | 6.9 | 4.5 | 1.1~12.4 | 58.0 |
2015 | 21.9 | 18.7~58.2 | 31.1 | 54.9 | 45.3~60.4 | 5.3 | 5.6 | 1.1~14.6 | 58.5 |
2016 | 27.7 | 21.1~37.1 | 15.1 | 59.1 | 53.3~65.6 | 4.5 | 6.5 | 1.1~22.0 | 75.6 |
2018 | 31.3 | 23.2~36.6 | 9.6 | 61.7 | 52.8~68.0 | 6.0 | 6.2 | 0.8~23.3 | 82.7 |
2019 | 28.6 | 15.6~39.5 | 14.7 | 62.4 | 52.2~73.0 | 7.1 | 5.5 | 0.2~17.3 | 56.4 |
平均Average | 28.1 | 15.6~58.2 | 17.0 | 59.2 | 45.3~73.0 | 6.0 | 5.7 | 0.2~23.3 | 66.2 |
表3 安徽省小麦主产县(市、区)抽检样品加工品质性状
Table 3 Processing quality characters of wheat samples from main wheat producing counties (cities, districts) in Anhui Province
年度 Year | 湿面筋含量Wet gluten content/% | 吸水率 Water absorption/% | 稳定时间 Stability time | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
均值 Means | 变化范围 Range | CV | 均值 Means | 变化范围 Range | CV | 均值 Means/min | 变化范围 Range/min | CV/% | |
2011 | 30.9 | 16.0~41.9 | 14.6 | 57.7 | 50.1~67.8 | 6.9 | 4.5 | 1.1~12.4 | 58.0 |
2015 | 21.9 | 18.7~58.2 | 31.1 | 54.9 | 45.3~60.4 | 5.3 | 5.6 | 1.1~14.6 | 58.5 |
2016 | 27.7 | 21.1~37.1 | 15.1 | 59.1 | 53.3~65.6 | 4.5 | 6.5 | 1.1~22.0 | 75.6 |
2018 | 31.3 | 23.2~36.6 | 9.6 | 61.7 | 52.8~68.0 | 6.0 | 6.2 | 0.8~23.3 | 82.7 |
2019 | 28.6 | 15.6~39.5 | 14.7 | 62.4 | 52.2~73.0 | 7.1 | 5.5 | 0.2~17.3 | 56.4 |
平均Average | 28.1 | 15.6~58.2 | 17.0 | 59.2 | 45.3~73.0 | 6.0 | 5.7 | 0.2~23.3 | 66.2 |
市 City | 县(市、区) County (city, district) | 容重 Bulk density/ (g·L-1) | 千粒重 Thousand kernel weight/g | 硬度指数 Hardness index | 粗蛋白质含量 Protein content/% | 湿面筋含量 Wet gluten content/% | 吸水率 Water absorption/% | 稳定时间 Stability time/min | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
蚌埠 | 固镇Guzhen | 793 | 39.7 | 64 | 13.0 | 30.1 | 59.6 | 5.5 | |
Bengbu | 变幅Range | 784~804 | 37.5~42.3 | 53~76 | 11.6~14.6 | 26.9~33.0 | 56.5~64.2 | 2.8~10.8 | |
变异系数CV/% | 1.2 | 5.0 | 16.6 | 9.5 | 9.8 | 6.2 | 68.2 | ||
怀远Huaiyuan | 793 | 41.5 | 64 | 12.9 | 27.8 | 61.8 | 4.3 | ||
变幅Range | 781~817 | 40.3~42.1 | 53~82 | 11.9~14.0 | 25.1~29.0 | 59.6~62.9 | 2.7~5.6 | ||
变异系数CV/% | 2.0 | 2.0 | 21.6 | 6.9 | 9.9 | 2.5 | 32.0 | ||
五河Wuhe | 810 | 39.1 | 65 | 12.1 | 25.2 | 59.9 | 9.1 | ||
变幅Range | 800~828 | 35.0~43.8 | 64~66 | 11.5~12.7 | 24.1~25.9 | 56.7~64.0 | 3.8~14.2 | ||
变异系数CV/% | 1.9 | 11.3 | 1.7 | 5.0 | 3.8 | 6.2 | 57.2 | ||
亳州 | 利辛Lixin | 797 | 40.3 | 58 | 12.9 | 31.9 | 56.0 | 4.6 | |
Bozhou | 变幅Range | 791~802 | 37.7~42.9 | 43~74 | 11.5~14.3 | 29.2~34.5 | 54.2~57.7 | 3.7~5.5 | |
市 City | 县(市、区) County (city, district) | 容重 Bulk density/ (g·L-1) | 千粒重 Thousand kernel weight/g | 硬度指数 Hardness index | 粗蛋白质含量 Protein content/% | 湿面筋含量 Wet gluten content/% | 吸水率 Water absorption/% | 稳定时间 Stability time/min | |
变异系数CV/% | 1.0 | 9.1 | 37.9 | 15.3 | 11.7 | 4.4 | 27.7 | ||
蒙城Mengcheng | 794 | 39.9 | 62 | 13.6 | 31.0 | 59.6 | 7.6 | ||
变幅Range | 790~796 | 38.7~42.6 | 49~76 | 11.4~15.1 | 29.6~32.5 | 55.1~64.9 | 4.6~9.9 | ||
变异系数CV/% | 0.3 | 4.6 | 23.3 | 11.7 | 4.1 | 6.9 | 31.9 | ||
谯城Qiaocheng | 796 | 41.7 | 60 | 13.2 | 32.5 | 58.2 | 6.3 | ||
变幅Range | 768~811 | 38.6~44.9 | 52~75 | 11.7~13.9 | 31.8~33.6 | 55.8~60.2 | 2.9~9.5 | ||
变异系数CV/% | 3.1 | 7.6 | 22.0 | 9.6 | 2.9 | 3.8 | 52.4 | ||
涡阳Woyang | 804 | 42.9 | 54 | 13.2 | 35.5 | 59.1 | 6.5 | ||
变幅Range | 788~820 | 42.3~43.5 | 52~55 | 11.9~14.5 | 31.1~39.9 | 56.3~61.9 | 5.7~7.2 | ||
变异系数CV/% | 2.8 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 13.9 | 17.5 | 6.7 | 16.3 | ||
滁州 | 定远Dingyuan | 792 | 39.3 | 45 | 13.2 | 27.9 | 56.5 | 3.2 | |
Chouzhou | 变幅Range | 765~820 | 36.6~43.8 | 33~66 | 11.8~13.9 | 23.9~30.5 | 54.2~59.2 | 1.8~4.5 | |
变异系数CV/% | 2.9 | 8.1 | 34.8 | 7.0 | 10.1 | 4.6 | 38.2 | ||
凤阳Fengyang | 788 | 38.9 | 57 | 13.0 | 29.7 | 59.8 | 4.2 | ||
变幅Range | 758~813 | 35.9~42.6 | 44~75 | 12.0~13.7 | 26.2~36.3 | 54.2~66.1 | 3.0~5.4 | ||
变异系数CV/% | 2.5 | 7.1 | 21.4 | 4.8 | 13.0 | 7.1 | 25.3 | ||
明光Mingguang | 796 | 40.6 | 59 | 13.1 | 28.6 | 58.5 | 4.6 | ||
变幅Range | 777~816 | 38.5~42.0 | 46~75 | 11.8~14.5 | 25.2~32.7 | 55.8~60.4 | 2.3~6.2 | ||
变异系数CV/% | 2.4 | 3.7 | 23.4 | 10.0 | 11.0 | 3.3 | 35.9 | ||
天长Tianchang | 795 | 41.7 | 68 | 14.8 | 30.2 | 63.7 | 7.4 | ||
变幅Range | 782~804 | 37.1~48.7 | 52~80 | 13.6~15.6 | 27.0~32.2 | 57.1~70.3 | 3.5~12.2 | ||
变异系数CV/% | 1.2 | 12.2 | 17.7 | 5.8 | 7.9 | 9.5 | 52.1 | ||
阜阳 | 阜南Funan | 758 | 42.4 | 36 | 13.5 | 26.6 | 58.8 | 2.9 | |
Fuyang | 变幅Range | 736~789 | 37.1~45.5 | 19~56 | 12.4~14.0 | 23.8~30.1 | 53.9~64.3 | 0.9~6.9 | |
变异系数CV/% | 3.0 | 8.8 | 49.7 | 5.5 | 11.8 | 7.7 | 93.8 | ||
临泉Lingquan | 779 | 41.5 | 55 | 13.7 | 31.5 | 58.7 | 6.7 | ||
变幅Range | 732~797 | 38.5~44.5 | 34~71 | 12.1~14.9 | 30.6~32.4 | 55.3~62.4 | 5.3~8.2 | ||
变异系数CV/% | 4.0 | 7.0 | 28.1 | 8.5 | 2.4 | 5.5 | 20.0 | ||
颍东Yingdong | 808 | 43.8 | 44 | 12.2 | 26.9 | 58.2 | 7.4 | ||
变幅Range | 805~811 | 41.3~46.2 | 23~66 | 11.4~12.9 | 26.8~27.0 | 52.1~64.2 | 4.6~10.1 | ||
变异系数CV/% | 0.5 | 7.9 | 69.0 | 8.7 | 0.5 | 14.7 | 52.6 | ||
颍泉Yingquan | 803 | 43.3 | 45 | 14.5 | 32.1 | 58.3 | 9.0 | ||
变幅Range | 774~831 | 37.2~47.3 | 25~77 | 14.2~15.0 | 30.4~33.6 | 55.8~60.0 | 6.6~13.8 | ||
变异系数CV/% | 3.5 | 12.4 | 60.3 | 3.2 | 5.0 | 3.8 | 45.9 | ||
颍上Yingshang | 807 | 41.2 | 46 | 12.6 | 26.1 | 59.7 | 3.6 | ||
变幅Range | 794~820 | 37.2~45.2 | 46~47 | 12.5~12.7 | 25.2~26.9 | 58.1~61.2 | 2.5~4.6 | ||
变异系数CV/% | 2.3 | 13.7 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 4.6 | 3.7 | 41.2 | ||
颍州Yingzhou | 815 | 43.8 | 59 | 12.7 | 28.1 | 55.3 | 7.8 | ||
变幅Range | 810~820 | 40.9~46.7 | 24~35 | 11.7~13.7 | 26.9~29.3 | 52.0~58.6 | 6.4~9.1 | ||
变异系数CV/% | 0.9 | 9.4 | 13.3 | 11.1 | 6.0 | 8.4 | 24.5 | ||
界首Jieshou | 835 | 44.1 | 71 | 13.6 | 29.8 | 64.0 | 7.8 | ||
变幅Range | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | ||
变异系数CV/% | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | ||
太和Taihe | 798 | 41.1 | 56 | 14.2 | 32.2 | 58.5 | 4.7 | ||
变幅Range | 786~813 | 39.8~42.6 | 27~74 | 13.9~15.1 | 30.6~33.5 | 52.8~64.6 | 2.8~7.9 | ||
变异系数CV/% | 1.7 | 3.4 | 45.2 | 5.3 | 4.6 | 10.1 | 58.8 | ||
合肥Hefei | 长丰Changfeng | 789 | 40.9 | 31 | 13.2 | 31.0 | 56.1 | 3.5 | |
变幅Range | 767~803 | 38.6~43.9 | 25~36 | 11.8~14.7 | 24.5~34.2 | 49.3~60.0 | 1.8~6.0 | ||
变异系数CV/% | 2.2 | 5.5 | 15.2 | 12.0 | 14.2 | 8.5 | 52.5 | ||
淮北 | 濉溪Suixi | 806 | 41.9 | 59 | 13.5 | 32.7 | 60.2 | 7.3 | |
Huaibei | 变幅Range | 782~832 | 39.9~45.4 | 52~66 | 11.8~15.2 | 27.4~42.1 | 58.5~62.3 | 3.9~11.0 | |
市 City | 县(市、区) County (city, district) | 容重 Bulk density/ (g·L-1) | 千粒重 Thousand kernel weight/g | 硬度指数 Hardness index | 粗蛋白质含量 Protein content/% | 湿面筋含量 Wet gluten content/% | 吸水率 Water absorption/% | 稳定时间 Stability time/min | |
变异系数CV/% | 2.5 | 7.0 | 12.0 | 10.3 | 20.7 | 2.7 | 45.4 | ||
烈山Lieshan | 812 | 43.7 | 64 | 14.0 | 28.9 | 64.5 | 5.2 | ||
变幅Range | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | ||
变异系数CV/% | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | ||
淮南 | 凤台Fengtai | 786 | 38.6 | 61 | 12.7 | 26.3 | 60.9 | 3.2 | |
Huainan | 变幅Range | 764~815 | 34.0~42.3 | 57~68 | 12.1~13.1 | 24.4~27.3 | 56.2~64.0 | 1.6~3.9 | |
变异系数CV/% | 2.8 | 8.9 | 8.8 | 3.3 | 4.9 | 5.7 | 33.2 | ||
潘集Panji | 780 | 37.9 | 67 | 12.3 | 25.0 | 57.8 | 3.7 | ||
变幅Range | 763~797 | 32.9~41.5 | 59~79 | 11.5~12.9 | 21.2~27.7 | 54.0~62.9 | 1.5~5.9 | ||
变异系数CV/% | 2.4 | 9.5 | 12.8 | 5.0 | 12.8 | 6.4 | 48.6 | ||
寿县Shouxian | 802 | 41.2 | 50 | 12.5 | 27.1 | 57.4 | 3.4 | ||
变幅Range | 770~823 | 36.6~47.4 | 28~72 | 10.6~13.8 | 21.6~32.7 | 54.9~60.2 | 1.3~5.7 | ||
变异系数CV/% | 2.8 | 10.9 | 40.5 | 11.8 | 17.7 | 4.6 | 56.8 | ||
六安Lu’an | 霍邱Huoqiu | 797 | 41.8 | 54 | 13.4 | 27.0 | 61.9 | 5.8 | |
变幅Range | 786~813 | 38.6~45.9 | 47~64 | 12.7~13.9 | 23.4~28.8 | 59.1~66.1 | 1.5~11.6 | ||
变异系数CV/% | 1.8 | 9.0 | 16.1 | 4.6 | 11.4 | 6.0 | 89.9 | ||
金安Jin’an | 768 | 37.5 | 45 | 14.1 | 29.3 | 57.8 | 6.6 | ||
变幅Range | 762~776 | 35.7~38.5 | 32~53 | 11.7~16.8 | 27.0~33.8 | 55.0~60.6 | 5.2~8.5 | ||
变异系数CV/% | 0.9 | 4.2 | 26.3 | 18.1 | 13.3 | 4.8 | 26.1 | ||
裕安Yu’an | 761 | 37.7 | 43 | 14.9 | 31.0 | 61.6 | 2.6 | ||
变幅Range | 727~811 | 35.2~40.9 | 20~71 | 14.4~15.2 | 24.2~35.1 | 59.5~62.9 | 1.6~3.9 | ||
变异系数CV/% | 5.8 | 7.8 | 59.5 | 3.1 | 19.2 | 3.0 | 44.9 | ||
宿州 | 砀山Dangshan | 804 | 44.5 | 58 | 12.8 | 31.5 | 59.5 | 4.6 | |
Suzhou | 变幅Range | 785~821 | 42.3~46.6 | 41~72 | 11.1~13.9 | 27.7~34.5 | 57.5~61.6 | 3.1~6.0 | |
变异系数CV/% | 2.2 | 4.8 | 26.9 | 11.8 | 11.1 | 3.5 | 31.6 | ||
灵璧Lingbi | 795 | 39.2 | 50 | 13.2 | 30.0 | 58.4 | 6.1 | ||
变幅Range | 775~823 | 35.1~45.2 | 39~63 | 12.1~14.2 | 28.5~31.6 | 52.4~64.0 | 4.4~7.2 | ||
变异系数CV/% | 3.0 | 11.1 | 22.7 | 6.8 | 5.0 | 8.2 | 19.6 | ||
泗县Sixian | 785 | 40.8 | 46 | 13.2 | 29.8 | 56.7 | 6.1 | ||
变幅Range | 768~797 | 38.0~43.5 | 26~77 | 12.3~14.0 | 27.1~33.0 | 52.5~61.6 | 4.8~7.5 | ||
变异系数CV/% | 1.7 | 5.3 | 47.5 | 5.5 | 8.8 | 6.0 | 16.1 | ||
萧县Xiaoxian | 805 | 42.5 | 51 | 13.6 | 31.7 | 58.6 | 5.0 | ||
变幅Range | 783~820 | 37.2~46.0 | 32~74 | 11.0~15.2 | 27.0~35.6 | 56.2~60.9 | 3.1~7.3 | ||
变异系数CV/% | 2.0 | 8.8 | 34.6 | 13.5 | 11.6 | 3.9 | 35.4 | ||
埇桥Yongqiao | 798 | 39.8 | 65 | 13.4 | 31.8 | 59.6 | 6.5 | ||
变幅Range | 776~820 | 36.9~42.0 | 59~73 | 11.7~15.1 | 27.8~33.7 | 54.8~64.9 | 3.6~9.3 | ||
变异系数CV/% | 2.4 | 5.3 | 10.0 | 11.2 | 8.7 | 7.3 | 36.7 |
表4 安徽省不同县(市、区)小麦抽检样品品质比较
Table 4 Quality comparison of wheat samples from different counties (cities, districts) in Anhui Province
市 City | 县(市、区) County (city, district) | 容重 Bulk density/ (g·L-1) | 千粒重 Thousand kernel weight/g | 硬度指数 Hardness index | 粗蛋白质含量 Protein content/% | 湿面筋含量 Wet gluten content/% | 吸水率 Water absorption/% | 稳定时间 Stability time/min | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
蚌埠 | 固镇Guzhen | 793 | 39.7 | 64 | 13.0 | 30.1 | 59.6 | 5.5 | |
Bengbu | 变幅Range | 784~804 | 37.5~42.3 | 53~76 | 11.6~14.6 | 26.9~33.0 | 56.5~64.2 | 2.8~10.8 | |
变异系数CV/% | 1.2 | 5.0 | 16.6 | 9.5 | 9.8 | 6.2 | 68.2 | ||
怀远Huaiyuan | 793 | 41.5 | 64 | 12.9 | 27.8 | 61.8 | 4.3 | ||
变幅Range | 781~817 | 40.3~42.1 | 53~82 | 11.9~14.0 | 25.1~29.0 | 59.6~62.9 | 2.7~5.6 | ||
变异系数CV/% | 2.0 | 2.0 | 21.6 | 6.9 | 9.9 | 2.5 | 32.0 | ||
五河Wuhe | 810 | 39.1 | 65 | 12.1 | 25.2 | 59.9 | 9.1 | ||
变幅Range | 800~828 | 35.0~43.8 | 64~66 | 11.5~12.7 | 24.1~25.9 | 56.7~64.0 | 3.8~14.2 | ||
变异系数CV/% | 1.9 | 11.3 | 1.7 | 5.0 | 3.8 | 6.2 | 57.2 | ||
亳州 | 利辛Lixin | 797 | 40.3 | 58 | 12.9 | 31.9 | 56.0 | 4.6 | |
Bozhou | 变幅Range | 791~802 | 37.7~42.9 | 43~74 | 11.5~14.3 | 29.2~34.5 | 54.2~57.7 | 3.7~5.5 | |
市 City | 县(市、区) County (city, district) | 容重 Bulk density/ (g·L-1) | 千粒重 Thousand kernel weight/g | 硬度指数 Hardness index | 粗蛋白质含量 Protein content/% | 湿面筋含量 Wet gluten content/% | 吸水率 Water absorption/% | 稳定时间 Stability time/min | |
变异系数CV/% | 1.0 | 9.1 | 37.9 | 15.3 | 11.7 | 4.4 | 27.7 | ||
蒙城Mengcheng | 794 | 39.9 | 62 | 13.6 | 31.0 | 59.6 | 7.6 | ||
变幅Range | 790~796 | 38.7~42.6 | 49~76 | 11.4~15.1 | 29.6~32.5 | 55.1~64.9 | 4.6~9.9 | ||
变异系数CV/% | 0.3 | 4.6 | 23.3 | 11.7 | 4.1 | 6.9 | 31.9 | ||
谯城Qiaocheng | 796 | 41.7 | 60 | 13.2 | 32.5 | 58.2 | 6.3 | ||
变幅Range | 768~811 | 38.6~44.9 | 52~75 | 11.7~13.9 | 31.8~33.6 | 55.8~60.2 | 2.9~9.5 | ||
变异系数CV/% | 3.1 | 7.6 | 22.0 | 9.6 | 2.9 | 3.8 | 52.4 | ||
涡阳Woyang | 804 | 42.9 | 54 | 13.2 | 35.5 | 59.1 | 6.5 | ||
变幅Range | 788~820 | 42.3~43.5 | 52~55 | 11.9~14.5 | 31.1~39.9 | 56.3~61.9 | 5.7~7.2 | ||
变异系数CV/% | 2.8 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 13.9 | 17.5 | 6.7 | 16.3 | ||
滁州 | 定远Dingyuan | 792 | 39.3 | 45 | 13.2 | 27.9 | 56.5 | 3.2 | |
Chouzhou | 变幅Range | 765~820 | 36.6~43.8 | 33~66 | 11.8~13.9 | 23.9~30.5 | 54.2~59.2 | 1.8~4.5 | |
变异系数CV/% | 2.9 | 8.1 | 34.8 | 7.0 | 10.1 | 4.6 | 38.2 | ||
凤阳Fengyang | 788 | 38.9 | 57 | 13.0 | 29.7 | 59.8 | 4.2 | ||
变幅Range | 758~813 | 35.9~42.6 | 44~75 | 12.0~13.7 | 26.2~36.3 | 54.2~66.1 | 3.0~5.4 | ||
变异系数CV/% | 2.5 | 7.1 | 21.4 | 4.8 | 13.0 | 7.1 | 25.3 | ||
明光Mingguang | 796 | 40.6 | 59 | 13.1 | 28.6 | 58.5 | 4.6 | ||
变幅Range | 777~816 | 38.5~42.0 | 46~75 | 11.8~14.5 | 25.2~32.7 | 55.8~60.4 | 2.3~6.2 | ||
变异系数CV/% | 2.4 | 3.7 | 23.4 | 10.0 | 11.0 | 3.3 | 35.9 | ||
天长Tianchang | 795 | 41.7 | 68 | 14.8 | 30.2 | 63.7 | 7.4 | ||
变幅Range | 782~804 | 37.1~48.7 | 52~80 | 13.6~15.6 | 27.0~32.2 | 57.1~70.3 | 3.5~12.2 | ||
变异系数CV/% | 1.2 | 12.2 | 17.7 | 5.8 | 7.9 | 9.5 | 52.1 | ||
阜阳 | 阜南Funan | 758 | 42.4 | 36 | 13.5 | 26.6 | 58.8 | 2.9 | |
Fuyang | 变幅Range | 736~789 | 37.1~45.5 | 19~56 | 12.4~14.0 | 23.8~30.1 | 53.9~64.3 | 0.9~6.9 | |
变异系数CV/% | 3.0 | 8.8 | 49.7 | 5.5 | 11.8 | 7.7 | 93.8 | ||
临泉Lingquan | 779 | 41.5 | 55 | 13.7 | 31.5 | 58.7 | 6.7 | ||
变幅Range | 732~797 | 38.5~44.5 | 34~71 | 12.1~14.9 | 30.6~32.4 | 55.3~62.4 | 5.3~8.2 | ||
变异系数CV/% | 4.0 | 7.0 | 28.1 | 8.5 | 2.4 | 5.5 | 20.0 | ||
颍东Yingdong | 808 | 43.8 | 44 | 12.2 | 26.9 | 58.2 | 7.4 | ||
变幅Range | 805~811 | 41.3~46.2 | 23~66 | 11.4~12.9 | 26.8~27.0 | 52.1~64.2 | 4.6~10.1 | ||
变异系数CV/% | 0.5 | 7.9 | 69.0 | 8.7 | 0.5 | 14.7 | 52.6 | ||
颍泉Yingquan | 803 | 43.3 | 45 | 14.5 | 32.1 | 58.3 | 9.0 | ||
变幅Range | 774~831 | 37.2~47.3 | 25~77 | 14.2~15.0 | 30.4~33.6 | 55.8~60.0 | 6.6~13.8 | ||
变异系数CV/% | 3.5 | 12.4 | 60.3 | 3.2 | 5.0 | 3.8 | 45.9 | ||
颍上Yingshang | 807 | 41.2 | 46 | 12.6 | 26.1 | 59.7 | 3.6 | ||
变幅Range | 794~820 | 37.2~45.2 | 46~47 | 12.5~12.7 | 25.2~26.9 | 58.1~61.2 | 2.5~4.6 | ||
变异系数CV/% | 2.3 | 13.7 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 4.6 | 3.7 | 41.2 | ||
颍州Yingzhou | 815 | 43.8 | 59 | 12.7 | 28.1 | 55.3 | 7.8 | ||
变幅Range | 810~820 | 40.9~46.7 | 24~35 | 11.7~13.7 | 26.9~29.3 | 52.0~58.6 | 6.4~9.1 | ||
变异系数CV/% | 0.9 | 9.4 | 13.3 | 11.1 | 6.0 | 8.4 | 24.5 | ||
界首Jieshou | 835 | 44.1 | 71 | 13.6 | 29.8 | 64.0 | 7.8 | ||
变幅Range | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | ||
变异系数CV/% | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | ||
太和Taihe | 798 | 41.1 | 56 | 14.2 | 32.2 | 58.5 | 4.7 | ||
变幅Range | 786~813 | 39.8~42.6 | 27~74 | 13.9~15.1 | 30.6~33.5 | 52.8~64.6 | 2.8~7.9 | ||
变异系数CV/% | 1.7 | 3.4 | 45.2 | 5.3 | 4.6 | 10.1 | 58.8 | ||
合肥Hefei | 长丰Changfeng | 789 | 40.9 | 31 | 13.2 | 31.0 | 56.1 | 3.5 | |
变幅Range | 767~803 | 38.6~43.9 | 25~36 | 11.8~14.7 | 24.5~34.2 | 49.3~60.0 | 1.8~6.0 | ||
变异系数CV/% | 2.2 | 5.5 | 15.2 | 12.0 | 14.2 | 8.5 | 52.5 | ||
淮北 | 濉溪Suixi | 806 | 41.9 | 59 | 13.5 | 32.7 | 60.2 | 7.3 | |
Huaibei | 变幅Range | 782~832 | 39.9~45.4 | 52~66 | 11.8~15.2 | 27.4~42.1 | 58.5~62.3 | 3.9~11.0 | |
市 City | 县(市、区) County (city, district) | 容重 Bulk density/ (g·L-1) | 千粒重 Thousand kernel weight/g | 硬度指数 Hardness index | 粗蛋白质含量 Protein content/% | 湿面筋含量 Wet gluten content/% | 吸水率 Water absorption/% | 稳定时间 Stability time/min | |
变异系数CV/% | 2.5 | 7.0 | 12.0 | 10.3 | 20.7 | 2.7 | 45.4 | ||
烈山Lieshan | 812 | 43.7 | 64 | 14.0 | 28.9 | 64.5 | 5.2 | ||
变幅Range | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | ||
变异系数CV/% | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | ||
淮南 | 凤台Fengtai | 786 | 38.6 | 61 | 12.7 | 26.3 | 60.9 | 3.2 | |
Huainan | 变幅Range | 764~815 | 34.0~42.3 | 57~68 | 12.1~13.1 | 24.4~27.3 | 56.2~64.0 | 1.6~3.9 | |
变异系数CV/% | 2.8 | 8.9 | 8.8 | 3.3 | 4.9 | 5.7 | 33.2 | ||
潘集Panji | 780 | 37.9 | 67 | 12.3 | 25.0 | 57.8 | 3.7 | ||
变幅Range | 763~797 | 32.9~41.5 | 59~79 | 11.5~12.9 | 21.2~27.7 | 54.0~62.9 | 1.5~5.9 | ||
变异系数CV/% | 2.4 | 9.5 | 12.8 | 5.0 | 12.8 | 6.4 | 48.6 | ||
寿县Shouxian | 802 | 41.2 | 50 | 12.5 | 27.1 | 57.4 | 3.4 | ||
变幅Range | 770~823 | 36.6~47.4 | 28~72 | 10.6~13.8 | 21.6~32.7 | 54.9~60.2 | 1.3~5.7 | ||
变异系数CV/% | 2.8 | 10.9 | 40.5 | 11.8 | 17.7 | 4.6 | 56.8 | ||
六安Lu’an | 霍邱Huoqiu | 797 | 41.8 | 54 | 13.4 | 27.0 | 61.9 | 5.8 | |
变幅Range | 786~813 | 38.6~45.9 | 47~64 | 12.7~13.9 | 23.4~28.8 | 59.1~66.1 | 1.5~11.6 | ||
变异系数CV/% | 1.8 | 9.0 | 16.1 | 4.6 | 11.4 | 6.0 | 89.9 | ||
金安Jin’an | 768 | 37.5 | 45 | 14.1 | 29.3 | 57.8 | 6.6 | ||
变幅Range | 762~776 | 35.7~38.5 | 32~53 | 11.7~16.8 | 27.0~33.8 | 55.0~60.6 | 5.2~8.5 | ||
变异系数CV/% | 0.9 | 4.2 | 26.3 | 18.1 | 13.3 | 4.8 | 26.1 | ||
裕安Yu’an | 761 | 37.7 | 43 | 14.9 | 31.0 | 61.6 | 2.6 | ||
变幅Range | 727~811 | 35.2~40.9 | 20~71 | 14.4~15.2 | 24.2~35.1 | 59.5~62.9 | 1.6~3.9 | ||
变异系数CV/% | 5.8 | 7.8 | 59.5 | 3.1 | 19.2 | 3.0 | 44.9 | ||
宿州 | 砀山Dangshan | 804 | 44.5 | 58 | 12.8 | 31.5 | 59.5 | 4.6 | |
Suzhou | 变幅Range | 785~821 | 42.3~46.6 | 41~72 | 11.1~13.9 | 27.7~34.5 | 57.5~61.6 | 3.1~6.0 | |
变异系数CV/% | 2.2 | 4.8 | 26.9 | 11.8 | 11.1 | 3.5 | 31.6 | ||
灵璧Lingbi | 795 | 39.2 | 50 | 13.2 | 30.0 | 58.4 | 6.1 | ||
变幅Range | 775~823 | 35.1~45.2 | 39~63 | 12.1~14.2 | 28.5~31.6 | 52.4~64.0 | 4.4~7.2 | ||
变异系数CV/% | 3.0 | 11.1 | 22.7 | 6.8 | 5.0 | 8.2 | 19.6 | ||
泗县Sixian | 785 | 40.8 | 46 | 13.2 | 29.8 | 56.7 | 6.1 | ||
变幅Range | 768~797 | 38.0~43.5 | 26~77 | 12.3~14.0 | 27.1~33.0 | 52.5~61.6 | 4.8~7.5 | ||
变异系数CV/% | 1.7 | 5.3 | 47.5 | 5.5 | 8.8 | 6.0 | 16.1 | ||
萧县Xiaoxian | 805 | 42.5 | 51 | 13.6 | 31.7 | 58.6 | 5.0 | ||
变幅Range | 783~820 | 37.2~46.0 | 32~74 | 11.0~15.2 | 27.0~35.6 | 56.2~60.9 | 3.1~7.3 | ||
变异系数CV/% | 2.0 | 8.8 | 34.6 | 13.5 | 11.6 | 3.9 | 35.4 | ||
埇桥Yongqiao | 798 | 39.8 | 65 | 13.4 | 31.8 | 59.6 | 6.5 | ||
变幅Range | 776~820 | 36.9~42.0 | 59~73 | 11.7~15.1 | 27.8~33.7 | 54.8~64.9 | 3.6~9.3 | ||
变异系数CV/% | 2.4 | 5.3 | 10.0 | 11.2 | 8.7 | 7.3 | 36.7 |
[1] | 胡学旭, 周桂英, 吴丽娜, 等. 2006—2014年我国小麦品质在年度和品质区之间的变化[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2016, 36(3): 292-301. |
HU X X, ZHOU G Y, WU L N, et al. Variation of wheat quality in wheat-producing regions in China from 2006 to 2014[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2016, 36(3): 292-301. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[2] |
ROOZEBOOM K L, SCHAPAUGH W T, TUINSTRA M R, et al. Testing wheat in variable environments: genotype, environment, interaction effects, and grouping test locations[J]. Crop Science, 2008, 48(1): 317-330.
DOI URL |
[3] |
SUBEDI K D, MA B L, XUE A G. Planting date and nitrogen effects on grain yield and protein content of spring wheat[J]. Crop Science, 2007, 47(1): 36-44.
DOI URL |
[4] |
WILLIAMS R M, O'BRIEN L, EAGLES H A, et al. The influences of genotype, environment, and genotype × environment interaction on wheat quality[J]. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 2008, 59(2): 95.
DOI URL |
[5] | 李元清, 吴晓华, 崔国惠, 等. 基因型、地点及其互作对内蒙古小麦主要品质性状的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(1): 47-53. |
LI Y Q, WU X H, CUI G H, et al. Effects of genotype, location, and genotype by location interaction on main wheat quality traits in Inner Mongolia[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2008, 34(1): 47-53. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[6] | 于亚雄, 杨延华, 陈坤玲, 等. 生态环境和栽培方式对小麦品质性状的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2001, 14(2): 14-17. |
YU Y X, YANG Y H, CHEN K L, et al. Influence of different environmnents and cultivation ways on Yunnan wheat quality characters[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2001, 14(2): 14-17. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[7] | 何中虎, 林作楫, 王龙俊, 等. 中国小麦品质区划的研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2002, 35(4): 359-364. |
HE Z H, LIN Z J, WANG L J, et al. Classification on Chinese wheat regions based on quality[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2002, 35(4): 359-364. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[8] | 昝香存, 周桂英, 吴丽娜, 等. 我国小麦品质现状分析[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2006, 26(6): 46-49, 55. |
ZAN X C, ZHOU G Y, WU L N, et al. Present status of wheat quality in China[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2006, 26(6): 46-49, 55. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[9] | 齐琳娟, 胡学旭, 周桂英, 等. 2004—2011年中国主产省小麦蛋白质品质分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(20): 4242-4251. |
QI L J, HU X X, ZHOU G Y, et al. Analysis of wheat protein quality in main wheat producing areas of China from 2004 to 2011[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(20): 4242-4251. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[10] | 胡学旭, 孙丽娟, 周桂英, 等. 2006—2015年中国小麦质量年度变化[J]. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(16): 3063-3072. |
HU X X, SUN L J, ZHOU G Y, et al. Variations of wheat quality in China from 2006 to 2015[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(16): 3063-3072. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[11] | 关二旗, 魏益民, 张波, 等. 黄淮冬麦区部分区域小麦品种构成及品质性状分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(6): 1159-1168. |
GUAN E Q, WEI Y M, ZHANG B, et al. Analysis of the variety composition and quality properties of wheat in A part of the Yellow-Huai river zone[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(6): 1159-1168. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[12] | 班进福, 刘彦军, 郭进考, 等. 2009年冀中小麦品质状况分析[J]. 中国粮油学报, 2011, 26(3): 5-10. |
BAN J F, LIU Y J, GUO J K, et al. Wheat quality status of middle part of Hebei Province in 2009[J]. Journal of the Chinese Cereals and Oils Association, 2011, 26(3): 5-10. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[13] | 卢洋洋, 张影全, 刘锐, 等. 豫北小麦籽粒质量性状空间变异特征[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2014, 34(4): 495-501. |
LU Y Y, ZHANG Y Q, LIU R, et al. Spatial variability analysis of grain quality parameters of wheat grown in northern Henan[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2014, 34(4): 495-501. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[14] | 张影全, 唐娜, 张波, 等. 冀南地区小麦籽粒品质现状及利用潜力分析[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2018, 38(2): 157-163. |
ZHANG Y Q, TANG N, ZHANG B, et al. Study on kernel quality property and processing potency of wheat in the south of Hebei Province[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2018, 38(2): 157-163. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[15] | 张礼军, 鲁清林, 白玉龙, 等. 甘肃小麦品质的区域间差异和利用潜力分析[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2019, 39(9): 1038-1046. |
ZHANG L J, LU Q L, BAI Y L, et al. Study on regional difference and utilization potential of wheat quality in Gansu Province[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2019, 39(9): 1038-1046. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[16] | 常莹莹, 王永华, 王永霞, 等. 黄淮砂姜黑土区强筯小麦品质现状及基因型与环境效应[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2018, 38(1): 105-112. |
CHANG Y Y, WANG Y H, WANG Y X, et al. Effect of genetic and environment on quality of strong-gluten wheat in lime concretion black soil area of Huang-Huai wheat region[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2018, 38(1): 105-112. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[17] | 李艳敏, 李珊, 王月娥, 等. 安徽省33个小麦品种烘焙品质研究[J]. 粮油食品科技, 2017, 25(6): 26-32. |
LI Y M, LI S, WANG Y E, et al. Research on baking quality of thirty-three varieties of wheat grown in Anhui Province[J]. Science and Technology of Cereals, Oils and Foods, 2017, 25(6): 26-32. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[18] | 张向前, 陈欢, 乔玉强, 等. 安徽不同生态区弱筋小麦产量和品质差异分析[J]. 西北农业学报, 2018, 27(12): 1763-1771. |
ZHANG X Q, CHEN H, QIAO Y Q, et al. The difference in yield and grain quality of weak gluten wheat that planting in different ecological areas of Anhui Province[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Occidentalis Sinica, 2018, 27(12): 1763-1771. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 吕敬, 吴治勇, 郭晓农, 冯玉兰, 卢建雄, 柴薇薇. 基于响应面法的乳酸菌发酵藜麦秸秆工艺条件优化[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(9): 1866-1876. |
[2] | 郭晗, 陆洲, 徐飞飞, 罗明, 张序. 基于全局敏感性分析与机器学习的冬小麦叶面积指数估算[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(9): 2020-2031. |
[3] | 王斯亮, 邵越, 闫成进. 草地贪夜蛾在玉米-小麦寄主转换中的转录组分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(6): 1236-1247. |
[4] | 蔡瑶, 缪宇轩, 吴浩, 王丹. 高CO2浓度下冬小麦的高光谱特征及其与叶面积指数和SPAD值的反演[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(3): 582-589. |
[5] | 闫宁, 张晗, 董宏图, 康凯, 罗斌. 基于透射光和反射光图像同位分割的小麦品种识别方法研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(3): 590-598. |
[6] | 郑文寅, 曾令楠, 程颖, 侯丞志, 曹文昕, 赵莉, 姚大年. 小麦籽粒类胡萝卜素含量的遗传分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(10): 2088-2094. |
[7] | 王掌军, 姚明明, 余慧霞, 王彦青, 李清峰, 刘凤楼, 刘彩霞, 张双喜, 张晓岗, 刘生祥. 宁春4号×河东乌麦F2∶5家系遗传图谱构建与籽粒蛋白质性状QTL分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(8): 1367-1378. |
[8] | 王玲玲, 吴文革, 李瑞, 胡健, 闫素辉, 邵庆勤, 许峰, 张从宇, 周永进, 李文阳. 施氮量对弱筋小麦籽粒品质与氮素利用的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(5): 777-784. |
[9] | 姚钊, 王重阳, 崔静. 小麦不同穗位籽粒灌浆特性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(4): 576-585. |
[10] | 赵珂, 李秋荣, 侯璐, 白耀博, 蒋礼玲, 魏有海, 郭青云. 2份春小麦种质资源成株期抗条锈病基因遗传分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(4): 595-601. |
[11] | 韩晓蕾, 高仕祺, 张帆, 羊健, 刘芃, 姜鸿明, 李林志. 酵母双杂交筛选与小麦黄花叶病毒P2互作的寄主因子[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(3): 497-505. |
[12] | 徐民民, 黄莹, 李波, 徐艳, 张帅, 姚岭芸, 王政. 生物炭对小麦根际和根内微生物群落结构的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(3): 516-525. |
[13] | 王潭刚, 孙婷, 王冀川, 李慧琴, 高振, 石元强. 播期和密度对滴灌冬小麦群体结构与抗倒特性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(2): 193-202. |
[14] | 王骏, 吴小保, 宋佳, 邓倩倩, 曾广, 任明见, 叶茂. 外源钙浸种对小麦防御酶和麦二叉蚜体内解毒酶活性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(12): 2339-2347. |
[15] | 王士臻, 王教瑜, 王艳丽, 孙国仓. 麦瘟病与小麦抗麦瘟基因研究进展[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(11): 2205-2212. |
阅读次数 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
全文 847
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
摘要 564
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||