不同干燥方式对黄桃果粉品质的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20221792

浙江农业学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (10): 2456-2464.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20221792

不同干燥方式对黄桃果粉品质的影响

刘贵阁¹^,²^,³(), 乔勇进³, 陈冰洁³, 王晓³, 张怡³, 钟耀广¹^,²^,^*()

1.上海海洋大学食品学院,上海 201306
2.上海海洋大学食品科学与工程国家级实验教学示范中心,上海 201306
3.上海市农业科学院农产品保鲜加工研究中心,上海 201400

收稿日期:2022-12-14 出版日期:2023-10-25 发布日期:2023-10-31
作者简介:刘贵阁(1996—),女,河南洛阳人,硕士,研究方向为农产品保鲜与加工。E-mail:1113212900@qq.com
通讯作者: ^*钟耀广,E-mail:ygzhong@shou.edu.cn
基金资助:
上海市科技兴农项目(沪农科推字〔2021〕第4-1号);上海市农产品保鲜加工专业技术服务平台项目(21DZ2292200)

Effect of drying methods on quality of yellow peach powder

LIU Guige¹^,²^,³(), QIAO Yongjin³, CHEN Bingjie³, WANG Xiao³, ZHANG Yi³, ZHONG Yaoguang¹^,²^,^*()

1. College of Food Sciences & Technology, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China
2. Experimental Teaching Demonstration Center for Food Science and Engineering, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China
3. Agri-Food Storage and Processing Research Center, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai 201400, China

Received:2022-12-14 Online:2023-10-25 Published:2023-10-31

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

以黄桃为原料,采用热风干燥(HAD)、喷雾干燥(SD)和真空冷冻干燥(VFD)3种方式制备黄桃果粉,对其进行感官评价,并就其色泽、溶解性、流动性、堆积密度、持水力和持油力等物理特性,蛋白质、总可溶性固形物、可滴定酸、维生素C、总酚等营养成分含量,微观结构,以及香气成分的种类和含量等进行深入分析。结果表明:经HAD处理的黄桃果粉色泽暗淡,黏度较大,组织状态较差。相较于SD,经VFD处理的黄桃果粉含水率[(2.69±0.02)%]、溶解时间[(46.67±0.21)s]、堆积密度[(0.21±0.11)g·mL^-1]和休止角[(26.07±0.25)°]显著(P<0.05)降低,水溶性指数[(98.21±0.16)%]、持水力[(2.51±0.19)g·g^-1]和持油力[(3.41±0.21)mL·g^-1]显著提高,总酚[(82.27±0.21)mg·kg^-1]、维生素C[(79.3±1.1)mg·kg^-1]和总可溶性固形物[(6.98±0.13)%]含量显著提高,且糖酸比较佳,挥发性醇、醛、酯类物质保留较多,具有更好的果味和香味。在微观结构上,经SD处理的黄桃果粉呈现球形、不规则的收缩状,而经VFD处理的黄桃果粉呈骨架状结构且多孔,易恢复到原结构,冲调性能较好。综上,真空冷冻干燥方式制得的黄桃果粉品质较佳,适宜在高质量黄桃果粉加工业中推广应用。

关键词: 黄桃, 热风干燥, 喷雾干燥, 真空冷冻干燥, 品质

Abstract:

In order to select the suitable drying method to produce yellow peach powder, yellow peach was used as raw material, hot air drying (HAD), spray drying (SD) and vacuum freeze drying (VFD) were introduced. Sensory evaluation of yellow peach powder was conducted, and physical properties such as color, solubility, fluidity, bulk density, water holding capacity, and oil holding capacity were determined. In addition, the contents of nutrients such as protein, total soluble solids, titratable acids, vitamin C, total phenols were explored, as well as the microstructure, and the types and contents of aroma components. The results showed that the yellow peach powder produced by HAD had dark color, high viscosity and poor tissue state. Compared with the yellow peach powder produced by SD, the water content [(2.69±0.02)%], dissolution time [(46.67±0.21) s], bulk density [(0.21±0.11) g·mL^-1] and angle of repose [(26.07±0.25)°] of yellow peach powder produce by VFD were significantly (P<0.05) decreased, yet its water solubility index [(98.21±0.16)%], water holding capacity [(2.51±0.19) g·g^-1] and oil holding capacity [(3.41±0.21) mL·g^-1] were significantly increased, and the contents of total phenols [(82.27±0.21) mg·kg^-1], vitamin C [(79.3±1.1) mg·kg^-1] and total soluble solids [(6.98±0.13)%] were significantly improved, and the ratio of sugar to acid was better. Besides, the yellow peach powder produced by VFD retained more volatile compounds, such as alcohols, aldehydes and esters, which exhibited better fruit flavor and aroma. For microstructure, the yellow peach powder produced by SD showed spherical, irregular shrinkage, while the yellow peach powder produced by VFD showed skeleton and porous structure, which was easy to recover to the original structure. In conclusion, the yellow peach powder produced by VFD had better quality. Thus, VFD is suitable to produce high-quality yellow peach powder.

Key words: yellow peach, hot air drying, spray drying, vacuum freeze drying, quality

中图分类号:

TS255.36

刘贵阁, 乔勇进, 陈冰洁, 王晓, 张怡, 钟耀广. 不同干燥方式对黄桃果粉品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(10): 2456-2464.

LIU Guige, QIAO Yongjin, CHEN Bingjie, WANG Xiao, ZHANG Yi, ZHONG Yaoguang. Effect of drying methods on quality of yellow peach powder[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(10): 2456-2464.

图/表 7

参考文献 30

[1]	WANG F Z, LYU J, XIE J, et al. Texture formation of dehydrated yellow peach slices pretreated by osmotic dehydration with different sugars via cell wall pectin polymers modification[J]. Food Hydrocolloids, 2023, 134: 108080.
[2]	HORUZ E, BOZKURT H, KARATAŞ H, et al. Effects of hybrid (microwave-convectional) and convectional drying on drying kinetics, total phenolics, antioxidant capacity, vitamin C, color and rehydration capacity of sour cherries[J]. Food Chemistry, 2017, 230: 295-305.
[3]	ZHANG Z Y, WEI Q Y, NIE M M, et al. Microstructure and bioaccessibility of different carotenoid species as affected by hot air drying: study on carrot, sweet potato, yellow bell pepper and broccoli[J]. LWT, 2018, 96: 357-363.
[4]	JAYAPRAKASH P, MAUDHUIT A, GAIANI C, et al. Encapsulation of bioactive compounds using competitive emerging techniques: electrospraying, nano spray drying, and electrostatic spray drying[J]. Journal of Food Engineering, 2023, 339: 111260.
[5]	NIE Y H, CHEN J H, XU J M, et al. Vacuum freeze-drying of tilapia skin affects the properties of skin and extracted gelatins[J]. Food Chemistry, 2022, 374: 131784.
[6]	林炎娟, 周丹蓉, 吴如健, 等. 不同干燥方式对橄榄果粉品质的影响[J]. 食品研究与开发, 2021, 42(7): 90-97.
	LIN Y J, ZHOU D R, WU R J, et al. Effects of different drying methods on the quality characteristics of olive powder[J]. Food Research and Development, 2021, 42(7): 90-97. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]	刘岩龙, 张彩丽, 李婷婷, 等. 不同干燥方式对樱桃果粉品质的影响[J]. 食品研究与开发, 2020, 41(7): 26-30.
	LIU Y L, ZHANG C L, LI T T, et al. Effect of different drying methods on the quality of cherry powder[J]. Food Research and Development, 2020, 41(7): 26-30. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	张艳侠, 张立华, 孙东东, 等. 干燥方法对石榴果粉品质特性的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2015, 43(8): 269-271.
	ZHANG Y X, ZHANG L H, SUN D D, et al. Effect of drying methods on quality characteristics of pomegranate fruit powder[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 43(8): 269-271. (in Chinese)
[9]	TETTEH E T, DE KOFF J P, POKHAREL B, et al. Effect of winter canola cultivar on seed yield, oil, and protein content[J]. Agronomy Journal, 2019, 111(6): 2811-2820.
[10]	SONG M T, XU H R, XIN G A, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of Actinidia arguta fruit based on the nutrition and taste: 67 germplasm native to Northeast China[J]. Food Science and Human Wellness, 2022, 11(2): 393-404.
[11]	ENONE B S, ETAME-LOE G M M, NGOULE C C, et al. Characterization and quantification of phenolic compounds of hydroethanolic extracts and fractions of leaves Gnetum africanum (Welv.) and Gnetum buchholzianum (Engl.) (Gnetaceae)[J]. Open Journal of Applied Sciences, 2022, 12(7): 1304-1318.
[12]	刘贵阁, 钟耀广, 乔勇进, 等. 干燥方式对黄桃果脯品质的影响[J]. 食品与机械, 2022, 38(9): 165-170.
	LIU G G, ZHONG Y G, QIAO Y J, et al. Effects of drying methods on the quality of preserved yellow peach[J]. Food & Machinery, 2022, 38(9): 165-170. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]	QADRI T, NAIK H R, HUSSAIN S Z, et al. Spray dried apple powder: qualitative, rheological, structural characterization and its sorption isotherm[J]. LWT, 2022, 165: 113694.
[14]	李伟, 郜海燕, 陈杭君, 等. 不同干燥方式对杨梅果粉品质的影响[J]. 食品科学, 2017, 38(13): 77-82.
	LI W, GAO H Y, CHEN H J, et al. Effect of drying methods on quality characteristics of bayberry powder[J]. Food Science, 2017, 38(13): 77-82. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]	JAFARI S M, GHALEGI GHALENOEI M, DEHNAD D. Influence of spray drying on water solubility index, apparent density, and anthocyanin content of pomegranate juice powder[J]. Powder Technology, 2017, 311: 59-65.
[16]	GOULA A M, ADAMOPOULOS K G. Spray drying of tomato pulp in dehumidified air: II: the effect on powder properties[J]. Journal of Food Engineering, 2005, 66(1): 35-42.
[17]	QUEK S Y, CHOK N K, SWEDLUND P. The physicochemical properties of spray-dried watermelon powders[J]. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 2007, 46(5): 386-392.
[18]	BHUSARI S N, MUZAFFAR K, KUMAR P. Effect of carrier agents on physical and microstructural properties of spray dried tamarind pulp powder[J]. Powder Technology, 2014, 266: 354-364.
[19]	FONGIN S, ALVINO GRANADOS A E, HARNKARNSUJARIT N, et al. Effects of maltodextrin and pulp on the water sorption, glass transition, and caking properties of freeze-dried mango powder[J]. Journal of Food Engineering, 2019, 247: 95-103.
[20]	符群, 钟明旭, 王萍. 不同干燥方式对黑果腺肋花楸果粉品质的影响[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2021, 41(1): 180-187.
	FU Q, ZHONG M X, WANG P. Effect of drying methods on quality characteristics of Aronia melanocarpa powder[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2021, 41(1): 180-187. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]	RICHTER REIS F, MARQUES C, DE MORAES A C S, et al. Trends in quality assessment and drying methods used for fruits and vegetables[J]. Food Control, 2022, 142: 109254.
[22]	王莹, 王辉, 王富, 等. 干燥方式对秋葵超微粉理化特性及抗氧化活性的影响[J]. 食品科学, 2018, 39(19): 114-119.
	WANG Y, WANG H, WANG F, et al. Effect of drying methods on physicochemical properties and antioxidant activity of superfine okra powder[J]. Food Science, 2018, 39(19): 114-119. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]	王储炎, 阎晓明, 任子旭, 等. 不同干燥方式对桑椹果粉物理特性的影响[J]. 蚕业科学, 2013, 39(2): 340-345.
	WANG C Y, YAN X M, REN Z X, et al. Effects of different drying methods on physical properties of mulberry fruit powder[J]. Science of Sericulture, 2013, 39(2): 340-345. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24]	陈晓旭, 易建勇, 毕金峰, 等. 不同联合干燥方式对火龙果粉品质的影响[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2015, 41(1): 106-112.
	CHEN X X, YI J Y, BI J F, et al. Effect of different combined drying methods on the quality characteristics of pitaya powder[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2015, 41(1): 106-112. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25]	叶丽琴, 孙萌, 张忠爽, 等. 不同发育阶段欧李果实糖酸变化规律研究及相关性分析[J]. 食品工业科技, 2017, 38(5): 98-102.
	YE L Q, SUN M, ZHANG Z S, et al. Analysis on the changes and correlations of sugar and organic acid contents in Chinese dwarf cherry [Cerasus humilis (Bge.) Sok.] during different development stages[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2017, 38(5): 98-102. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26]	张琴, 周丹丹, 彭菁, 等. 油桃采后结合态香气变化规律及其与可溶性糖的关联性[J]. 食品科学, 2021, 42(6): 206-214.
	ZHANG Q, ZHOU D D, PENG J, et al. Changes of bound aroma compounds and their relationship between soluble sugars in nectarines during postharvest storage[J]. Food Science, 2021, 42(6): 206-214. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[27]	YANG C, DUAN W Y, XIE K L, et al. Effect of salicylic acid treatment on sensory quality, flavor-related chemicals and gene expression in peach fruit after cold storage[J]. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2020, 161: 111089.
[28]	LENG P, HU H W, CUI A H, et al. HS-GC-IMS with PCA to analyze volatile flavor compounds of honey peach packaged with different preservation methods during storage[J]. LWT, 2021, 149: 111963.
[29]	NIJDAM J J, LANGRISH T A G. An investigation of milk powders produced by a laboratory-scale spray dryer[J]. Drying Technology, 2005, 23(5): 1043-1056.
[30]	CAPARINO O A, TANG J, NINDO C I, et al. Effect of drying methods on the physical properties and microstructures of mango (Philippine ‘Carabao’ var.) powder[J]. Journal of Food Engineering, 2012, 111(1): 135-148.

编辑推荐

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

420

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	12	0	0	408

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	266	154
比例	63%	37%

摘要

215

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

0	0	215

	来源	本网站

	次数	215
	比例	100%

指标Index	评估标准Evaluation standard	分值Score
色泽Color	色泽鲜亮,粉质细腻Bright color, fine powder	16~20
	色泽偏暗,粉质细腻Dark color, fine powder	10~15
	色泽偏暗,粉质粗糙Dark color, coarse powder	0~9
滋味Taste	口感柔顺,无颗粒感Soft and grainy	21~30
	口感较浓郁,无颗粒感Rich taste and grainy	10~20
	口感过于浓郁或有明显颗粒感Too rich taste or with obvious grain feeling	0~9
气味Smell	有浓厚的桃香味,无异味Strong peach flavor, without peculiar smell	16~20
	有桃的清香味,无异味Frragrance of peach, without peculiar smell	10~15
	香气不足或存在异味Weak fragrance of peach, or with peculiar smell	0~9
组织状态Texture	溶解性好,无沉淀Good solubility, no precipitation	21~30
	溶解性良好,有少量沉淀Good solubility, with a small amount of precipitation	10~20
	溶解性较差,有较多沉淀Poor solubility, with a lot of precipitation	0~9

指标Index	评估标准Evaluation standard	分值Score
色泽Color	色泽鲜亮,粉质细腻Bright color, fine powder	16~20
	色泽偏暗,粉质细腻Dark color, fine powder	10~15
	色泽偏暗,粉质粗糙Dark color, coarse powder	0~9
滋味Taste	口感柔顺,无颗粒感Soft and grainy	21~30
	口感较浓郁,无颗粒感Rich taste and grainy	10~20
	口感过于浓郁或有明显颗粒感Too rich taste or with obvious grain feeling	0~9
气味Smell	有浓厚的桃香味,无异味Strong peach flavor, without peculiar smell	16~20
	有桃的清香味,无异味Frragrance of peach, without peculiar smell	10~15
	香气不足或存在异味Weak fragrance of peach, or with peculiar smell	0~9
组织状态Texture	溶解性好,无沉淀Good solubility, no precipitation	21~30
	溶解性良好,有少量沉淀Good solubility, with a small amount of precipitation	10~20
	溶解性较差,有较多沉淀Poor solubility, with a lot of precipitation	0~9

处理Treatment	色泽Color	滋味Taste	香气Smell	组织状态Texture	总分Total
HAD	5.23±0.22 c	10.82±0.11 c	6.42±0.19 c	8.88±0.21 c	31.35±3.35 c
SD	14.74±0.16 b	23.87±0.15 b	13.29±0.13 b	22.25±0.13 b	74.15±0.57 b
VFD	17.93±0.13 a	26.65±0.12 a	17.94±0.16 a	27.73±0.12 a	90.25±1.14 a

处理Treatment	色泽Color	滋味Taste	香气Smell	组织状态Texture	总分Total
HAD	5.23±0.22 c	10.82±0.11 c	6.42±0.19 c	8.88±0.21 c	31.35±3.35 c
SD	14.74±0.16 b	23.87±0.15 b	13.29±0.13 b	22.25±0.13 b	74.15±0.57 b
VFD	17.93±0.13 a	26.65±0.12 a	17.94±0.16 a	27.73±0.12 a	90.25±1.14 a

处理Treatment	L^*	a^*	b^*	ΔΕ
鲜果Fresh fruit	64.38±0.32 c	8.54±0.13 a	38.78±0.26 a	—
SD	89.76±0.15 a	4.44±0.23 b	17.95±0.32 c	33.09±0.42 a
VFD	79.25±0.21 b	8.44±0.19 a	29.52±0.16 b	17.52±0.13 b

不同干燥方式对黄桃果粉品质的影响

Effect of drying methods on quality of yellow peach powder

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 30

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

指标Index	SD	VFD
出粉率Powder yield/%	9.98±0.14 a	7.83±0.12 b
含水率Water content/%	3.91±0.05 a	2.69±0.02 b
溶解时间Dissolution time/s	85.33±0.31 a	46.67±0.21 b
水溶性指数	60.08±0.27 b	98.21±0.16 a
Water solubility index/%
结块度Caking degree/%	1.48±0.21 a	1.07±0.02 b
堆积密度	0.45±0.31 a	0.21±0.11 b
Bulk density/(g·mL^-1)
休止角Angle of repose (θ)/(°)	32.48±0.17 a	26.07±0.25 b
持水力	0.69±0.23 b	2.51±0.19 a
Water holding capacity/(g·g^-1)
持油力	1.26±0.17 b	3.41±0.21 a
Oil holding capacity/(mL·g^-1)

处理 Treatment	蛋白质 Protein/%	维生素C Vitamin C/ ( mg·kg^-1)	总酚 Total phenols/ (mg·kg^-1)	TSS/%	可滴定酸 Titratable acid/ (g·kg^-1)	糖酸比 Ratio of sugar to acid
SD	0.32±0.02 a	45.2±2.1 b	56.82±0.34 b	5.18±0.04 b	3.2±0.1 b	16.18±0.15 a
VFD	0.33±0.01 a	79.3±1.1 a	82.27±0.21 a	6.98±0.13 a	6.9±0.4 a	10.12±0.39 b

化合物种类 Compound type	化合物 Compound	保留时间 Retention time/min	不同干燥方式下的含量 Contents under varied drying methods/(μg·kg^-1)
化合物种类 Compound type	化合物 Compound	保留时间 Retention time/min	SD	VFD
烷烃Alkanes	十二烷Dodecane	17.920	7.98±1.22 b	49.76±2.20 a
	十三烷Tridecane	22.609	7.86±1.31 b	42.35±2.87 a
烯烃Alkenes	苯乙烯Styrene	20.972	6.22±1.56 b	42.82±1.99 a
醇Alcohols	正己醇N-Hexanol	25.259	—	17.80±2.22
	(E)-2-己烯醇(E) 2-Hexenol	27.214	—	41.82±2.38
	2-乙基己醇2-Ethylhexanol	29.967	35.74±2.22 b	462.98±33.78 a
	芳樟醇Linalool	31.629	—	21.53±1.92
醛Aldehydes	正己醛N-Hexanal	13.319	105.81±10.14 b	148.20±19.87 a
	(E)2-己烯醛(E) 2-Hexenal	19.317	5.74±1.52 b	32.98±2.10 a
	壬醛Nonanal	26.674	101.03±26.65 b	693.13±30.98 a
	苯甲醛Benzaldehyde	31.105	7.99±1.76 b	38.32±2.22 a
	2-壬烯醛2-Nonenal	31.400	5.81±1.61 b	19.00±2.64 a
酯Esters	乙酸己酯Hexyl acetate	21.711	—	526.80±28.27
	乙酸顺式-3-己烯酯Cis-3-Hexene acetate	23.685	—	317.99±27.76
	(E)-乙酸-2-己烯-1-醇酯Trans-2-Hexenyl acetate	24.357	—	329.27±21.23
	γ-己内酯γ-Caprolactone	36.108	2.58±0.31 b	11.47±1.12 a
	丁位癸内酯5-Decanolide	46.676	—	8.98±1.93
酮Ketones	甲基庚烯酮Methyl heptanone	24.549	10.58±1.20 b	42.69±22.87 a
	大马酮Damascenone	38.909	1.56±0.34 b	36.60±1.23 a
	香叶基丙酮Geranyl acetone	39.463	9.50±1.62 b	37.01±3.76 a

[1]	岳宗伟, 李嘉骁, 孙向阳, 刘国梁, 李素艳, 王晨晨, 查贵超, 魏宁娴. 化肥有机肥配施对土壤性质、樱桃果实品质和产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(9): 2192-2201.
[2]	张博, 刘泽慈, 汪洁, 李兆壮, 李录山, 胡琳莉, 郁继华. 不同农业废弃物肥料化配方对露地甘蓝生长、产量及品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(8): 1782-1792.
[3]	张宁, 陶荣浩, 刘佩诗, 胡含秀, 高琳琳, 郭龙, 祝尊友, 马友华. 不同种类有机肥配施化肥对茶叶生长、品质和土壤肥力的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(8): 1844-1852.
[4]	王迪, 杨汉梅, 李阳倩, 贾梦婷, 邹亮, 杨帆. 苦荞麦“品、质、效、用”的多维评价及其活性成分高值化利用的研究进展[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(8): 1960-1974.
[5]	田玉刚, 万素梅, 林皎, 陈国栋, 李浩, 胡宇凯, 李燕芳, 胡守林, 毛廷勇, 赵书珍. 不同地膜类型与灌溉量对棉花光合参数和产量、品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(7): 1523-1531.
[6]	卜远鹏, 刘娜, 张古文, 冯志娟, 王斌, 龚亚明, 许林英. 菜用大豆种质资源的农艺性状多样性评价及核心种质与食味品质评价体系的构建[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(6): 1307-1314.
[7]	柴冠群, 周玮, 梁红, 范菲菲, 朱大雁, 范成五. 叶面喷施锌肥和柠檬酸对辣椒产量、品质与Cd吸收转运的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(5): 1069-1079.
[8]	肖立涵, 辛美果, 卢文静, 叶沁, 张岑, 肖朝耿, 谌迪. 不同贮藏条件对3种花粉源蜂王浆品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(5): 1161-1167.
[9]	马义虎, 曾孝元, 何贤彪, 周奶弟, 陈剑. 浙东南地区优质稻产量与品质对不同播期气候因子的响应[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(4): 736-751.
[10]	王金凤, 周琦, 吕玉龙, 陈卓梅. 间作景观树种对茶园生态系统与茶叶生产的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(3): 523-533.
[11]	王龙威, 白俊艳, 贾小平, 雷莹, 陈梦柯, 樊红灯, 卢小宁, 何豫涵, 曾凡林, 张容恺. 鹌鹑GnRH-1基因多态性与蛋品质的关联分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(3): 565-574.
[12]	黄秋伟, 毛立彦, 檀小辉, 王丽萍, 刘功德, 彭继飞, 龙凌云. 贮藏温度对广西旱藕采后重要品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(2): 346-354.
[13]	唐文静, 龚荣高, 初元琦, 陈超群, 陈红旭, 冉茂升, 张瑶, 杨文龙. 不同遮光率对甜樱桃果实品质和光合特性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(10): 2346-2353.
[14]	王犇, 李宇星, 李哲, 姜沣溢, 黄正来, 樊永惠, 张文静, 马尚宇. 海藻糖处理对花后高温胁迫弱筋小麦生选6号产量形成及品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(1): 1-9.
[15]	茹朝, 郁继华, 武玥, 冯致, 缑兆辉, 金宁, 王舒亚, 刘泽慈, 吕剑. 化肥减量配施生物有机肥对露地大白菜产量及品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(8): 1626-1637.