浙江农业学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (4): 736-751.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2023.04.02
马义虎1(), 曾孝元2, 何贤彪1,*(
), 周奶弟3,*(
), 陈剑1
收稿日期:
2022-05-16
出版日期:
2023-04-25
发布日期:
2023-05-05
通讯作者:
何贤彪,周奶弟
作者简介:
周奶弟,E-mail: znd8187@sina.com基金资助:
MA Yihu1(), ZENG Xiaoyuan2, HE Xianbiao1,*(
), ZHOU Naidi3,*(
), CHEN Jian1
Received:
2022-05-16
Online:
2023-04-25
Published:
2023-05-05
Contact:
HE Xianbiao,ZHOU Naidi
摘要:
为明确浙东南地区不同类型优质稻的适宜播期,以籼粳杂交稻甬优1540和杂交籼稻泰两优217为材料,开展大田分期播种试验,研究5个不同播期(Ⅰ~Ⅴ期)对水稻产量及其构成因素、生育期、秧苗素质、分蘖特性、群体生长率、干物质积累和稻米品质的影响,并分析水稻产量、品质与气候因子之间的相关性。结果表明:随播期推迟,甬优1540和泰两优217产量先增后减,分别以第Ⅱ期和第Ⅲ期最高,其对应的产量潜力分别为11.54和9.47 t·hm-2;其构成因素的变化趋势与产量变化基本一致。生育时期随播期推迟而相应顺延,播种-齐穗期缩短,齐穗-成熟期延长,全生育期变化因品种而异。随播期推迟,秧苗素质、干物质积累和收获指数先提高后降低,分蘖数上升而成穗率下降,群体生长率和茎叶输出率因品种、生育阶段不同而存在差异。播期主要影响稻米的加工和外观品质,其品质总体随播期推迟呈变优的趋势。产量与齐穗-成熟期的温光资源显著或极显著正相关,而品质与齐穗20 d至成熟期的温光资源关系密切。综上,在该地区甬优1540高产与优质同步的播期为5月7日至5月26日;泰两优217高产且相对优质的播期为5月16日至5月22日,而优质且相对高产的播期为5月23日至5月27日。
中图分类号:
马义虎, 曾孝元, 何贤彪, 周奶弟, 陈剑. 浙东南地区优质稻产量与品质对不同播期气候因子的响应[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(4): 736-751.
MA Yihu, ZENG Xiaoyuan, HE Xianbiao, ZHOU Naidi, CHEN Jian. Response of grain yield and quality of high quality rice to climate factors at different sowing dates in southeastern Zhejiang Province, China[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(4): 736-751.
变异来源 Sources of variation | 自由度 Degree of freedom | 平方和 Sum of square | 均方 Mean square | F值 F value |
---|---|---|---|---|
年度 Year (Y) | 1 | 0.017 | 0.017 | 0.012 |
播期 Sowing date (S) | 4 | 7.193 | 1.798 | 74.807** |
品种 Cultivar (C) | 1 | 75.331 | 75.331 | 3 133.577** |
年度×播期 Y×S | 4 | 0.021 | 0.005 | 0.221 |
年度×品种 Y×C | 1 | 0.008 | 0.008 | 0.330 |
播期×品种 S×C | 4 | 0.446 | 0.112 | 4.643** |
年度×播期×品种 | 4 | 0.003 | 0.001 | 0.034 |
Y×S×C |
表1 产量在年度、播期与品种间的方差分析
Table 1 Analysis-of-variance (F-values) for grain yield between/among years, sowing dates and rice cultivars
变异来源 Sources of variation | 自由度 Degree of freedom | 平方和 Sum of square | 均方 Mean square | F值 F value |
---|---|---|---|---|
年度 Year (Y) | 1 | 0.017 | 0.017 | 0.012 |
播期 Sowing date (S) | 4 | 7.193 | 1.798 | 74.807** |
品种 Cultivar (C) | 1 | 75.331 | 75.331 | 3 133.577** |
年度×播期 Y×S | 4 | 0.021 | 0.005 | 0.221 |
年度×品种 Y×C | 1 | 0.008 | 0.008 | 0.330 |
播期×品种 S×C | 4 | 0.446 | 0.112 | 4.643** |
年度×播期×品种 | 4 | 0.003 | 0.001 | 0.034 |
Y×S×C |
品种 Cultivar | 播期处理 Sowing date treatment | 2021年产量及其构成因素Grain yield and its components in 2021 | 2020年实 际产量 Actual grain yield in 2020/(t· hm-2) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
株高 Plant height/ cm | 有效穗数 Number of productive panicles/ (×104·hm-2) | 每穗粒数 Spikelets number per panicle | 总颖花量 Total amount of spikelets/ (×106·hm-2) | 结实率 Seed- setting rate/% | 千粒重 1 000- grain weight/g | 理论产量 Theoretical grain yield/ (t·hm-2) | 实际产量 Actual grain yield/ (t·hm-2) | |||
甬优1540 Yongyou 1540 | Ⅰ | 125.5 ±0.8 a | 202.3 ±3.0 c | 253.3 ±2.9 c | 512.4 ±21.2 d | 93.4 ±2.3 a | 23.29 ±0.07 c | 11.14 ±0.12 cd | 11.05 ±0.18 bc | 11.09 ±0.21 b |
Ⅱ | 123.2 ±1.2 b | 209.1 ±3.1 a | 265.6 ±2.6 a | 555.4 ±18.9 a | 93.5 ±1.9 a | 23.41 ±0.02 ab | 12.16 ±0.29 a | 11.60 ±0.21 a | 11.58 ±0.27 a | |
Ⅲ | 119.9 ±1.5 c | 207.8 ±2.4 ab | 263.1 ±2.7 ab | 545.3 ±17.1 ab | 92.0 ±1.6 ab | 23.43 ±0.06 a | 11.76 ±0.17 b | 11.53 ±0.14 a | 11.47 ±0.09 a | |
Ⅳ | 118.5 ±1.1 c | 207.3 ±2.6 ab | 258.7 ±3.9 bc | 537.5 ±12.6 bc | 89.7 ±2.4 bc | 23.31 ±0.10 bc | 11.23 ±0.14 c | 11.20 ±0.26 b | 11.17 ±0.15 b | |
Ⅴ | 116.2 ±1.3 d | 206.4 ±3.2 b | 256.4 ±2.4 c | 529.3 ±13.2 c | 88.1 ±1.7 c | 23.28 ±0.04 c | 10.86 ±0.18 d | 10.83 ±0.19 c | 10.79 ±0.17 c | |
平均值 Average | 120.7 ±3.7 | 206.6 ±2.6 | 259.4 ±5.0 | 536.0 ±16.3 | 91.3 ±2.4 | 23.34 ±0.07 | 11.43 ±0.52 | 11.24 ±0.32 | 11.22 ±0.31 | |
CV/% | 3.1 | 1.2 | 1.9 | 3.0 | 2.6 | 0.3 | 4.5 | 2.9 | 2.8 | |
泰两优217 Tailiangyou 217 | Ⅰ | 120.5 ±1.0 a | 216.4 ±4.2 d | 189.7 ±3.7 d | 410.7 ±21.6 d | 89.4 ±1.3 a | 24.47 ±0.13 c | 8.98 ±0.21 c | 8.60 ±0.18 c | 8.68 ±0.12 c |
Ⅱ | 118.3 ±1.4 ab | 222.4 ±4.0 c | 198.5 ±5.5 c | 441.4 ±17.3 c | 87.8 ±2.1 b | 24.67 ±0.14 b | 9.55 ±0.18 b | 9.29 ±0.35 b | 9.35 ±0.24 a | |
Ⅲ | 116.5 ±1.5 bc | 229.6 ±4.6 a | 208.2 ±4.2 a | 479.6 ±22.4 a | 85.3 ±2.7 c | 24.75 ±0.06 a | 10.12 ±0.26 a | 9.57 ±0.21 a | 9.53 ±0.29 a | |
株高 Plant height/ cm | 有效穗数 Number of productive panicles/ (×104·hm-2) | 每穗粒数 Spikelets number per panicle | 总颖花量 Total amount of spikelets/ (×106·hm-2) | 结实率 Seed- setting rate/% | 千粒重 1 000- grain weight/g | 理论产量 Theoretical grain yield/ (t·hm-2) | 实际产量 Actual grain yield/ (t·hm-2) | |||
Ⅳ | 115.2 ±0.7 bc | 230.4 ±3.7 a | 201.0 ±2.9 bc | 461.4 ±18.5 b | 82.8 ±1.6 d | 24.49 ±0.09 c | 9.35 ±0.24 b | 9.03 ±0.27 b | 9.01 ±0.15 b | |
Ⅴ | 114.1 ±1.9 c | 225.9 ±3.0 b | 201.5 ±3.6 b | 455.2 ±23.4 b | 79.8 ±2.9 e | 24.21 ±0.11 d | 8.79 ±0.29 c | 8.41 ±0.32 c | 8.44 ±0.23 c | |
平均值 Average | 116.9 ±2.5 | 224.9 ±5.7 | 199.8 ±6.7 | 449.7 ±25.7 | 85.0 ±3.8 | 24.52 ±0.21 | 9.36 ±0.52 | 8.98 ±0.48 | 9.00 ±0.45 | |
CV/% | 2.2 | 2.6 | 3.3 | 5.7 | 4.5 | 0.9 | 5.6 | 5.3 | 5.0 | |
方差分析 Analysis of | 播期 Sowing date | * | * | * | ** | ** | * | ** | ** | ** |
variance | 品种 | * | ** | ** | ** | ** | * | ** | ** | ** |
Cultivar | ||||||||||
播期×品种 | ns | * | * | * | ns | ns | ** | ** | ** | |
Sowing date ×Cultivar |
表2 不同播期下优质稻的产量及其构成因素
Table 2 Grain yield and its components of high quality rice under different sowing dates
品种 Cultivar | 播期处理 Sowing date treatment | 2021年产量及其构成因素Grain yield and its components in 2021 | 2020年实 际产量 Actual grain yield in 2020/(t· hm-2) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
株高 Plant height/ cm | 有效穗数 Number of productive panicles/ (×104·hm-2) | 每穗粒数 Spikelets number per panicle | 总颖花量 Total amount of spikelets/ (×106·hm-2) | 结实率 Seed- setting rate/% | 千粒重 1 000- grain weight/g | 理论产量 Theoretical grain yield/ (t·hm-2) | 实际产量 Actual grain yield/ (t·hm-2) | |||
甬优1540 Yongyou 1540 | Ⅰ | 125.5 ±0.8 a | 202.3 ±3.0 c | 253.3 ±2.9 c | 512.4 ±21.2 d | 93.4 ±2.3 a | 23.29 ±0.07 c | 11.14 ±0.12 cd | 11.05 ±0.18 bc | 11.09 ±0.21 b |
Ⅱ | 123.2 ±1.2 b | 209.1 ±3.1 a | 265.6 ±2.6 a | 555.4 ±18.9 a | 93.5 ±1.9 a | 23.41 ±0.02 ab | 12.16 ±0.29 a | 11.60 ±0.21 a | 11.58 ±0.27 a | |
Ⅲ | 119.9 ±1.5 c | 207.8 ±2.4 ab | 263.1 ±2.7 ab | 545.3 ±17.1 ab | 92.0 ±1.6 ab | 23.43 ±0.06 a | 11.76 ±0.17 b | 11.53 ±0.14 a | 11.47 ±0.09 a | |
Ⅳ | 118.5 ±1.1 c | 207.3 ±2.6 ab | 258.7 ±3.9 bc | 537.5 ±12.6 bc | 89.7 ±2.4 bc | 23.31 ±0.10 bc | 11.23 ±0.14 c | 11.20 ±0.26 b | 11.17 ±0.15 b | |
Ⅴ | 116.2 ±1.3 d | 206.4 ±3.2 b | 256.4 ±2.4 c | 529.3 ±13.2 c | 88.1 ±1.7 c | 23.28 ±0.04 c | 10.86 ±0.18 d | 10.83 ±0.19 c | 10.79 ±0.17 c | |
平均值 Average | 120.7 ±3.7 | 206.6 ±2.6 | 259.4 ±5.0 | 536.0 ±16.3 | 91.3 ±2.4 | 23.34 ±0.07 | 11.43 ±0.52 | 11.24 ±0.32 | 11.22 ±0.31 | |
CV/% | 3.1 | 1.2 | 1.9 | 3.0 | 2.6 | 0.3 | 4.5 | 2.9 | 2.8 | |
泰两优217 Tailiangyou 217 | Ⅰ | 120.5 ±1.0 a | 216.4 ±4.2 d | 189.7 ±3.7 d | 410.7 ±21.6 d | 89.4 ±1.3 a | 24.47 ±0.13 c | 8.98 ±0.21 c | 8.60 ±0.18 c | 8.68 ±0.12 c |
Ⅱ | 118.3 ±1.4 ab | 222.4 ±4.0 c | 198.5 ±5.5 c | 441.4 ±17.3 c | 87.8 ±2.1 b | 24.67 ±0.14 b | 9.55 ±0.18 b | 9.29 ±0.35 b | 9.35 ±0.24 a | |
Ⅲ | 116.5 ±1.5 bc | 229.6 ±4.6 a | 208.2 ±4.2 a | 479.6 ±22.4 a | 85.3 ±2.7 c | 24.75 ±0.06 a | 10.12 ±0.26 a | 9.57 ±0.21 a | 9.53 ±0.29 a | |
株高 Plant height/ cm | 有效穗数 Number of productive panicles/ (×104·hm-2) | 每穗粒数 Spikelets number per panicle | 总颖花量 Total amount of spikelets/ (×106·hm-2) | 结实率 Seed- setting rate/% | 千粒重 1 000- grain weight/g | 理论产量 Theoretical grain yield/ (t·hm-2) | 实际产量 Actual grain yield/ (t·hm-2) | |||
Ⅳ | 115.2 ±0.7 bc | 230.4 ±3.7 a | 201.0 ±2.9 bc | 461.4 ±18.5 b | 82.8 ±1.6 d | 24.49 ±0.09 c | 9.35 ±0.24 b | 9.03 ±0.27 b | 9.01 ±0.15 b | |
Ⅴ | 114.1 ±1.9 c | 225.9 ±3.0 b | 201.5 ±3.6 b | 455.2 ±23.4 b | 79.8 ±2.9 e | 24.21 ±0.11 d | 8.79 ±0.29 c | 8.41 ±0.32 c | 8.44 ±0.23 c | |
平均值 Average | 116.9 ±2.5 | 224.9 ±5.7 | 199.8 ±6.7 | 449.7 ±25.7 | 85.0 ±3.8 | 24.52 ±0.21 | 9.36 ±0.52 | 8.98 ±0.48 | 9.00 ±0.45 | |
CV/% | 2.2 | 2.6 | 3.3 | 5.7 | 4.5 | 0.9 | 5.6 | 5.3 | 5.0 | |
方差分析 Analysis of | 播期 Sowing date | * | * | * | ** | ** | * | ** | ** | ** |
variance | 品种 | * | ** | ** | ** | ** | * | ** | ** | ** |
Cultivar | ||||||||||
播期×品种 | ns | * | * | * | ns | ns | ** | ** | ** | |
Sowing date ×Cultivar |
品种 Cultivar | Y=at2+bt+c | Ymean/ (t·hm-2) | Ymax/ (t·hm-2) | Ymean/ Ymax/% | Y0.98对应播期 Sowing date for Y0.98 | Ymax对应播期 Sowing date for Ymax | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
a | b | c | R2 | ||||||
甬优1540 | -0.001 44 | 0.048 51 | 11.127 43 | 0.926 1* | 11.23 | 11.54 | 97.31 | 2021-05-02— | 2021-05-14 |
Yongyou 1540 | 2021-05-26 | ||||||||
泰两优217 | -0.002 37 | 0.087 46 | 8.663 71 | 0.967 0* | 8.99 | 9.47 | 94.93 | 2021-05-09— | 2021-05-16 |
Tailiangyou 217 | 2021-05-22 |
表3 播期对不同类型优质稻产量影响的回归方程
Table 3 Regression equation of effects of sowing dates on grain yield of different types of high quality rice
品种 Cultivar | Y=at2+bt+c | Ymean/ (t·hm-2) | Ymax/ (t·hm-2) | Ymean/ Ymax/% | Y0.98对应播期 Sowing date for Y0.98 | Ymax对应播期 Sowing date for Ymax | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
a | b | c | R2 | ||||||
甬优1540 | -0.001 44 | 0.048 51 | 11.127 43 | 0.926 1* | 11.23 | 11.54 | 97.31 | 2021-05-02— | 2021-05-14 |
Yongyou 1540 | 2021-05-26 | ||||||||
泰两优217 | -0.002 37 | 0.087 46 | 8.663 71 | 0.967 0* | 8.99 | 9.47 | 94.93 | 2021-05-09— | 2021-05-16 |
Tailiangyou 217 | 2021-05-22 |
品种 Cultivar | 播期处理 Sowing date treatment | 播种期 Sowing date | 移栽期 Transplanting date | 齐穗期 Full heading | 成熟期 Maturity | 播种- 齐穗期 S-F/d | 齐穗- 成熟期 F-M/d | 全生育期 Whole growth period/d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
甬优1540 | Ⅰ | 2021-04-27 | 2021-05-23 | 2021-08-15 | 2021-09-29 | 110 | 45 | 155 |
Yongyou 1540 | Ⅱ | 2021-05-07 | 2021-06-02 | 2021-08-19 | 2021-10-06 | 104 | 48 | 152 |
Ⅲ | 2021-05-17 | 2021-06-12 | 2021-08-26 | 2021-10-14 | 101 | 49 | 150 | |
Ⅳ | 2021-05-27 | 2021-06-22 | 2021-08-31 | 2021-10-20 | 96 | 50 | 146 | |
Ⅴ | 2021-06-06 | 2021-07-02 | 2021-09-04 | 2021-10-25 | 90 | 51 | 141 | |
平均值Average | 100.2 | 48.6 | 148.8 | |||||
CV/% | 7.6 | 4.7 | 3.7 | |||||
泰两优217 | Ⅰ | 2021-04-27 | 2021-05-23 | 2021-08-13 | 2021-09-20 | 108 | 38 | 146 |
Tailiangyou 217 | Ⅱ | 2021-05-07 | 2021-06-02 | 2021-08-18 | 2021-10-01 | 103 | 44 | 147 |
Ⅲ | 2021-05-17 | 2021-06-12 | 2021-08-25 | 2021-10-13 | 100 | 49 | 149 | |
Ⅳ | 2021-05-27 | 2021-06-22 | 2021-09-03 | 2021-10-24 | 99 | 51 | 150 | |
Ⅴ | 2021-06-06 | 2021-07-02 | 2021-09-12 | 2021-11-05 | 98 | 54 | 152 | |
平均值Average | 101.6 | 47.2 | 148.8 | |||||
CV/% | 4.0 | 13.3 | 1.6 |
表4 不同播期下优质稻的主要生育时期
Table 4 The main growth periods of high quality rice under different sowing dates
品种 Cultivar | 播期处理 Sowing date treatment | 播种期 Sowing date | 移栽期 Transplanting date | 齐穗期 Full heading | 成熟期 Maturity | 播种- 齐穗期 S-F/d | 齐穗- 成熟期 F-M/d | 全生育期 Whole growth period/d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
甬优1540 | Ⅰ | 2021-04-27 | 2021-05-23 | 2021-08-15 | 2021-09-29 | 110 | 45 | 155 |
Yongyou 1540 | Ⅱ | 2021-05-07 | 2021-06-02 | 2021-08-19 | 2021-10-06 | 104 | 48 | 152 |
Ⅲ | 2021-05-17 | 2021-06-12 | 2021-08-26 | 2021-10-14 | 101 | 49 | 150 | |
Ⅳ | 2021-05-27 | 2021-06-22 | 2021-08-31 | 2021-10-20 | 96 | 50 | 146 | |
Ⅴ | 2021-06-06 | 2021-07-02 | 2021-09-04 | 2021-10-25 | 90 | 51 | 141 | |
平均值Average | 100.2 | 48.6 | 148.8 | |||||
CV/% | 7.6 | 4.7 | 3.7 | |||||
泰两优217 | Ⅰ | 2021-04-27 | 2021-05-23 | 2021-08-13 | 2021-09-20 | 108 | 38 | 146 |
Tailiangyou 217 | Ⅱ | 2021-05-07 | 2021-06-02 | 2021-08-18 | 2021-10-01 | 103 | 44 | 147 |
Ⅲ | 2021-05-17 | 2021-06-12 | 2021-08-25 | 2021-10-13 | 100 | 49 | 149 | |
Ⅳ | 2021-05-27 | 2021-06-22 | 2021-09-03 | 2021-10-24 | 99 | 51 | 150 | |
Ⅴ | 2021-06-06 | 2021-07-02 | 2021-09-12 | 2021-11-05 | 98 | 54 | 152 | |
平均值Average | 101.6 | 47.2 | 148.8 | |||||
CV/% | 4.0 | 13.3 | 1.6 |
品种 Cultivar | 播期处理 Sowing date treatment | 叶龄 Leaf age | 苗高 Seedling height/cm | 茎基宽 Stem base width/cm | 每株茎叶干重 Dry weight of stem and leaf per plant/ mg | 每株根干重 Dry weight of root per plant/ mg | 根冠比 Root-shoot ratio | 充实度 Plumpness/ (mg·cm-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
甬优1540 | Ⅰ | 3.14±0.25 d | 13.35±1.51 a | 0.22±0.02 b | 16.33±2.39 d | 6.33±1.35 c | 0.39±0.01 b | 1.22±0.08 c |
Yongyou 1540 | Ⅱ | 3.62±0.37 c | 15.15±2.42 b | 0.25±0.01 ab | 21.67±2.34 c | 9.67±2.14 b | 0.45±0.02 a | 1.43±0.12 b |
Ⅲ | 3.79±0.24 bc | 18.83±3.11 c | 0.27±0.03 a | 28.33±2.65 b | 11.00±2.09 a | 0.39±0.02 b | 1.51±0.18 a | |
Ⅳ | 4.10±0.35 ab | 21.60±2.33 d | 0.25±0.04 ab | 31.10±3.27 a | 10.90±1.97 a | 0.35±0.04 c | 1.44±0.07 b | |
Ⅴ | 4.30±0.29 a | 23.10±3.41 e | 0.24±0.05 ab | 32.10±4.52 a | 10.12±1.67 ab | 0.32±0.02 d | 1.39±0.16 b | |
平均值Average | 3.79±0.45 | 18.41±4.14 | 0.24±0.02 | 25.91±6.72 | 9.61±1.91 | 0.38±0.05 | 1.40±0.11 | |
CV/% | 11.9 | 22.5 | 8.1 | 26.0 | 19.9 | 12.9 | 7.6 | |
泰两优217 | Ⅰ | 2.73±0.14 c | 12.94±2.68 a | 0.24±0.04 b | 14.01±2.68 d | 7.03±2.10 c | 0.50±0.02 a | 1.08±0.21 d |
Tailiangyou 217 | Ⅱ | 3.23±0.21 b | 15.17±2.61 b | 0.25±0.02 ab | 19.67±3.49 c | 8.91±1.56 b | 0.45±0.01 b | 1.30±0.18 c |
Ⅲ | 3.44±0.30 b | 17.84±3.13 c | 0.26±0.02 ab | 28.00±4.10 b | 10.67±2.03 a | 0.38±0.03 c | 1.57±0.24 a | |
Ⅳ | 3.80±0.18 a | 19.32±2.03 d | 0.27±0.03 a | 30.20±2.26 a | 10.90±1.29 a | 0.36±0.01 c | 1.56±0.16 a | |
Ⅴ | 4.00±0.24 a | 21.92±3.02 e | 0.26±0.04 ab | 31.10±3.23 a | 11.02±1.58 a | 0.35±0.05 c | 1.42±0.19 b | |
平均值Average | 3.44±0.05 | 17.44±3.51 | 0.25±0.01 | 24.60±7.44 | 9.71±1.72 | 0.41±0.06 | 1.39±0.20 | |
CV/% | 14.5 | 20.1 | 4.7 | 30.3 | 17.7 | 15.7 | 14.7 |
表5 不同播期下优质稻的秧苗素质
Table 5 Seedling quality of high quality rice under different sowing dates
品种 Cultivar | 播期处理 Sowing date treatment | 叶龄 Leaf age | 苗高 Seedling height/cm | 茎基宽 Stem base width/cm | 每株茎叶干重 Dry weight of stem and leaf per plant/ mg | 每株根干重 Dry weight of root per plant/ mg | 根冠比 Root-shoot ratio | 充实度 Plumpness/ (mg·cm-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
甬优1540 | Ⅰ | 3.14±0.25 d | 13.35±1.51 a | 0.22±0.02 b | 16.33±2.39 d | 6.33±1.35 c | 0.39±0.01 b | 1.22±0.08 c |
Yongyou 1540 | Ⅱ | 3.62±0.37 c | 15.15±2.42 b | 0.25±0.01 ab | 21.67±2.34 c | 9.67±2.14 b | 0.45±0.02 a | 1.43±0.12 b |
Ⅲ | 3.79±0.24 bc | 18.83±3.11 c | 0.27±0.03 a | 28.33±2.65 b | 11.00±2.09 a | 0.39±0.02 b | 1.51±0.18 a | |
Ⅳ | 4.10±0.35 ab | 21.60±2.33 d | 0.25±0.04 ab | 31.10±3.27 a | 10.90±1.97 a | 0.35±0.04 c | 1.44±0.07 b | |
Ⅴ | 4.30±0.29 a | 23.10±3.41 e | 0.24±0.05 ab | 32.10±4.52 a | 10.12±1.67 ab | 0.32±0.02 d | 1.39±0.16 b | |
平均值Average | 3.79±0.45 | 18.41±4.14 | 0.24±0.02 | 25.91±6.72 | 9.61±1.91 | 0.38±0.05 | 1.40±0.11 | |
CV/% | 11.9 | 22.5 | 8.1 | 26.0 | 19.9 | 12.9 | 7.6 | |
泰两优217 | Ⅰ | 2.73±0.14 c | 12.94±2.68 a | 0.24±0.04 b | 14.01±2.68 d | 7.03±2.10 c | 0.50±0.02 a | 1.08±0.21 d |
Tailiangyou 217 | Ⅱ | 3.23±0.21 b | 15.17±2.61 b | 0.25±0.02 ab | 19.67±3.49 c | 8.91±1.56 b | 0.45±0.01 b | 1.30±0.18 c |
Ⅲ | 3.44±0.30 b | 17.84±3.13 c | 0.26±0.02 ab | 28.00±4.10 b | 10.67±2.03 a | 0.38±0.03 c | 1.57±0.24 a | |
Ⅳ | 3.80±0.18 a | 19.32±2.03 d | 0.27±0.03 a | 30.20±2.26 a | 10.90±1.29 a | 0.36±0.01 c | 1.56±0.16 a | |
Ⅴ | 4.00±0.24 a | 21.92±3.02 e | 0.26±0.04 ab | 31.10±3.23 a | 11.02±1.58 a | 0.35±0.05 c | 1.42±0.19 b | |
平均值Average | 3.44±0.05 | 17.44±3.51 | 0.25±0.01 | 24.60±7.44 | 9.71±1.72 | 0.41±0.06 | 1.39±0.20 | |
CV/% | 14.5 | 20.1 | 4.7 | 30.3 | 17.7 | 15.7 | 14.7 |
品种 Cultivar | 播期处理 Sowing date treatment | 落田苗 Basic seedlings number/ (×104·hm-2) | 最高苗 The highest tillering number/ (×104·hm-2) | 单株最大分蘖数 The max tillering number | 有效穗数 Number of productive panicles/ (×104·hm-2) | 茎蘖成穗率 Productive tiller percentage/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
甬优1540 | Ⅰ | 59.83±0.04 a | 253.64±21.42 e | 3.2±1.5 c | 202.31±2.98 c | 79.8±3.2 a |
Yongyou 1540 | Ⅱ | 59.99±0.21 a | 267.47±22.87 d | 3.5±0.8 bc | 209.07±3.12 a | 78.2±1.5 ab |
Ⅲ | 60.30±0.14 a | 274.51±15.37 c | 3.6±1.1 bc | 207.81±2.37 ab | 75.7±2.1 b | |
Ⅳ | 59.83±0.06 a | 294.16±17.98 b | 3.9±0.8 ab | 207.28±2.59 ab | 70.5±2.8 c | |
Ⅴ | 61.20±0.08 a | 313.52±24.90 a | 4.1±1.4 a | 206.40±3.17 b | 65.8±3.4 d | |
平均值Average | 60.23±0.58 | 280.66±23.47 | 3.7±0.4 | 206.57±2.57 | 74.0±5.8 | |
CV/% | 1.0 | 8.4 | 9.8 | 1.2 | 7.8 | |
泰两优217 | Ⅰ | 63.49±0.17 a | 313.47±28.45 d | 3.9±0.9 c | 216.44±4.24 d | 69.0±1.9 a |
Tailiangyou 217 | Ⅱ | 64.99±0.08 a | 334.11±19.99 c | 4.1±1.1 bc | 222.36±3.98 c | 66.6±2.3 b |
Ⅲ | 66.66±0.14 a | 367.56±24.67 b | 4.5±0.8 ab | 229.58±4.57 a | 62.5±2.0 c | |
Ⅳ | 68.33±0.11 a | 386.02±26.98 a | 4.6±1.2 a | 230.37±3.65 a | 59.7±2.8 d | |
Ⅴ | 65.33±0.09 a | 373.88±29.26b | 4.7±0.7 a | 225.87±2.98 b | 60.4±1.7 cd | |
平均值Average | 65.76±1.82 | 355.01±30.16 | 4.4±0.3 | 224.92±5.72 | 63.6±4.0 | |
CV/% | 2.8 | 8.5 | 7.7 | 2.5 | 6.3 |
表6 不同播期下优质稻的分蘖能力与茎蘖成穗率
Table 6 Tillering ability and productive tiller percentage of high quality rice under different sowing dates
品种 Cultivar | 播期处理 Sowing date treatment | 落田苗 Basic seedlings number/ (×104·hm-2) | 最高苗 The highest tillering number/ (×104·hm-2) | 单株最大分蘖数 The max tillering number | 有效穗数 Number of productive panicles/ (×104·hm-2) | 茎蘖成穗率 Productive tiller percentage/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
甬优1540 | Ⅰ | 59.83±0.04 a | 253.64±21.42 e | 3.2±1.5 c | 202.31±2.98 c | 79.8±3.2 a |
Yongyou 1540 | Ⅱ | 59.99±0.21 a | 267.47±22.87 d | 3.5±0.8 bc | 209.07±3.12 a | 78.2±1.5 ab |
Ⅲ | 60.30±0.14 a | 274.51±15.37 c | 3.6±1.1 bc | 207.81±2.37 ab | 75.7±2.1 b | |
Ⅳ | 59.83±0.06 a | 294.16±17.98 b | 3.9±0.8 ab | 207.28±2.59 ab | 70.5±2.8 c | |
Ⅴ | 61.20±0.08 a | 313.52±24.90 a | 4.1±1.4 a | 206.40±3.17 b | 65.8±3.4 d | |
平均值Average | 60.23±0.58 | 280.66±23.47 | 3.7±0.4 | 206.57±2.57 | 74.0±5.8 | |
CV/% | 1.0 | 8.4 | 9.8 | 1.2 | 7.8 | |
泰两优217 | Ⅰ | 63.49±0.17 a | 313.47±28.45 d | 3.9±0.9 c | 216.44±4.24 d | 69.0±1.9 a |
Tailiangyou 217 | Ⅱ | 64.99±0.08 a | 334.11±19.99 c | 4.1±1.1 bc | 222.36±3.98 c | 66.6±2.3 b |
Ⅲ | 66.66±0.14 a | 367.56±24.67 b | 4.5±0.8 ab | 229.58±4.57 a | 62.5±2.0 c | |
Ⅳ | 68.33±0.11 a | 386.02±26.98 a | 4.6±1.2 a | 230.37±3.65 a | 59.7±2.8 d | |
Ⅴ | 65.33±0.09 a | 373.88±29.26b | 4.7±0.7 a | 225.87±2.98 b | 60.4±1.7 cd | |
平均值Average | 65.76±1.82 | 355.01±30.16 | 4.4±0.3 | 224.92±5.72 | 63.6±4.0 | |
CV/% | 2.8 | 8.5 | 7.7 | 2.5 | 6.3 |
品种 Cultivar | 播期处理 Sowing date treatment | 播种-齐穗期S-F | 齐穗-成熟期F-M | 成熟期Maturing stage | 茎叶输 出率 OPDMSL /% | 收获 指数 Harvest index | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
干物质积累量 DMA/(t· hm-2) | 群体生长率 PGR/(kg· hm-2·d-1) | 干物质积累量 DMA/(t· hm-2) | 群体生长率 PGR/(kg· hm-2·d-1) | 稻谷干重 DWOGY/ (t·hm-2) | 稻草干重 DWORS/ (t·hm-2) | 总干物质积累量 TDMA/ (t·hm-2) | 群体生长率 PGR/(kg· hm-2·d-1) | ||||
甬优1540 | Ⅰ | 11.33 a | 103.04 c | 7.56 ab | 167.91 a | 9.42 c | 9.47 a | 18.89 ab | 121.87 d | 16.42 c | 0.499 d |
Yongyou 1540 | Ⅱ | 11.18 a | 107.46 c | 7.78 a | 162.17 b | 9.92 a | 9.04 b | 18.96 a | 124.74 c | 19.14 ab | 0.523 a |
Ⅲ | 11.10 a | 109.92 bc | 7.57 ab | 154.45 c | 9.75 ab | 8.93 b | 18.67 bc | 124.47 c | 19.55 a | 0.522 a | |
Ⅳ | 11.13 a | 115.94 ab | 7.42 b | 148.40 d | 9.51 bc | 9.04 b | 18.55 c | 127.05 b | 18.78 b | 0.513 b | |
Ⅴ | 10.79 b | 119.84 a | 7.52 ab | 147.53 d | 9.28 c | 9.03 b | 18.31 d | 129.86 a | 16.31 c | 0.507 c | |
平均值 | 11.11 | 111.24 | 7.57 | 156.09 | 9.58 | 9.10 | 18.68 | 125.60 | 18.04 | 0.513 | |
Average | |||||||||||
CV/% | 1.8 | 6.0 | 1.7 | 5.7 | 2.7 | 2.3 | 1.4 | 2.4 | 8.6 | 2.0 | |
泰两优217 | Ⅰ | 10.04 b | 92.92 c | 5.73 b | 150.92 a | 7.52 c | 8.25 a | 15.77 b | 108.01 ab | 17.83 d | 0.477 c |
Tailiangyou 217 | Ⅱ | 10.10 b | 98.08 b | 6.19 a | 140.62 b | 8.07 ab | 8.22 a | 16.29 a | 110.82 a | 18.61 c | 0.495 b |
Ⅲ | 10.28 a | 102.82 a | 6.04 ab | 123.23 c | 8.26 a | 8.06 b | 16.32 a | 109.53 a | 21.60 b | 0.506 a | |
Ⅳ | 10.19 ab | 102.88 a | 5.66 b | 111.07 d | 7.83 b | 8.01 b | 15.85 b | 105.67 b | 21.39 b | 0.494 b | |
Ⅴ | 10.09 b | 102.98 a | 4.85 c | 89.77 e | 7.30 c | 7.63 c | 14.94 c | 98.29 c | 24.38 a | 0.489 b | |
平均值 | 10.14 | 99.94 | 5.69 | 123.12 | 7.80 | 8.03 | 15.83 | 106.46 | 20.76 | 0.492 | |
Average | |||||||||||
CV/% | 0.9 | 4.4 | 9.1 | 19.6 | 5.0 | 3.1 | 3.5 | 4.7 | 12.6 | 2.1 |
表7 不同播期下优质稻的干物质积累与收获指数
Table 7 Dry matter accumulation and harvest index of high quality rice under different sowing dates
品种 Cultivar | 播期处理 Sowing date treatment | 播种-齐穗期S-F | 齐穗-成熟期F-M | 成熟期Maturing stage | 茎叶输 出率 OPDMSL /% | 收获 指数 Harvest index | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
干物质积累量 DMA/(t· hm-2) | 群体生长率 PGR/(kg· hm-2·d-1) | 干物质积累量 DMA/(t· hm-2) | 群体生长率 PGR/(kg· hm-2·d-1) | 稻谷干重 DWOGY/ (t·hm-2) | 稻草干重 DWORS/ (t·hm-2) | 总干物质积累量 TDMA/ (t·hm-2) | 群体生长率 PGR/(kg· hm-2·d-1) | ||||
甬优1540 | Ⅰ | 11.33 a | 103.04 c | 7.56 ab | 167.91 a | 9.42 c | 9.47 a | 18.89 ab | 121.87 d | 16.42 c | 0.499 d |
Yongyou 1540 | Ⅱ | 11.18 a | 107.46 c | 7.78 a | 162.17 b | 9.92 a | 9.04 b | 18.96 a | 124.74 c | 19.14 ab | 0.523 a |
Ⅲ | 11.10 a | 109.92 bc | 7.57 ab | 154.45 c | 9.75 ab | 8.93 b | 18.67 bc | 124.47 c | 19.55 a | 0.522 a | |
Ⅳ | 11.13 a | 115.94 ab | 7.42 b | 148.40 d | 9.51 bc | 9.04 b | 18.55 c | 127.05 b | 18.78 b | 0.513 b | |
Ⅴ | 10.79 b | 119.84 a | 7.52 ab | 147.53 d | 9.28 c | 9.03 b | 18.31 d | 129.86 a | 16.31 c | 0.507 c | |
平均值 | 11.11 | 111.24 | 7.57 | 156.09 | 9.58 | 9.10 | 18.68 | 125.60 | 18.04 | 0.513 | |
Average | |||||||||||
CV/% | 1.8 | 6.0 | 1.7 | 5.7 | 2.7 | 2.3 | 1.4 | 2.4 | 8.6 | 2.0 | |
泰两优217 | Ⅰ | 10.04 b | 92.92 c | 5.73 b | 150.92 a | 7.52 c | 8.25 a | 15.77 b | 108.01 ab | 17.83 d | 0.477 c |
Tailiangyou 217 | Ⅱ | 10.10 b | 98.08 b | 6.19 a | 140.62 b | 8.07 ab | 8.22 a | 16.29 a | 110.82 a | 18.61 c | 0.495 b |
Ⅲ | 10.28 a | 102.82 a | 6.04 ab | 123.23 c | 8.26 a | 8.06 b | 16.32 a | 109.53 a | 21.60 b | 0.506 a | |
Ⅳ | 10.19 ab | 102.88 a | 5.66 b | 111.07 d | 7.83 b | 8.01 b | 15.85 b | 105.67 b | 21.39 b | 0.494 b | |
Ⅴ | 10.09 b | 102.98 a | 4.85 c | 89.77 e | 7.30 c | 7.63 c | 14.94 c | 98.29 c | 24.38 a | 0.489 b | |
平均值 | 10.14 | 99.94 | 5.69 | 123.12 | 7.80 | 8.03 | 15.83 | 106.46 | 20.76 | 0.492 | |
Average | |||||||||||
CV/% | 0.9 | 4.4 | 9.1 | 19.6 | 5.0 | 3.1 | 3.5 | 4.7 | 12.6 | 2.1 |
品种 Cultivar | 播期处理 Sowing date treatment | 糙米率 Brown rice percentage/% | 精米率 Milled rice percentage/% | 整精米率 Head rice percentage/% | 粒长 Kernal length/ mm | 长宽比 Length- width ratio | 垩白粒率 Chalky percentage/% | 垩白度 Chalkiness/% | 透明度 Transparency/ rank | 碱消值 Alkali spreading value/rank | 胶稠度 Gel consistency/ mm | 直链淀粉含量 Amylose content/% | 蛋白质含量 Protein content/% | 综合判定等级 Comprehensive evaluation grade |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
甬优1540 | Ⅰ | 81.2 c | 73.3 b | 61.8 d | 5.6 a | 2.2 a | 23 a | 4.3 a | 2 a | 6.8 b | 76 a | 14.8 c | 6.66 bc | 3级 Grade 3 |
Yongyou 1540 | Ⅱ | 82.9 a | 74.3 a | 63.5 c | 5.6 a | 2.3 a | 20 b | 2.8 b | 2 a | 7.0 a | 75 a | 15.5 b | 7.04 a | 2级 Grade 2 |
Ⅲ | 82.0 b | 73.6 ab | 64.8 bc | 5.7 a | 2.3 a | 18 b | 2.6 bc | 2 a | 7.0 a | 77 a | 16.6 a | 6.96 ab | 2级 Grade 2 | |
Ⅳ | 81.3 c | 73.5 ab | 65.8 ab | 5.8 a | 2.4 a | 15 c | 2.4 bc | 2 a | 6.8 b | 76 a | 16.7 a | 6.65 bc | 2级 Grade 2 | |
Ⅴ | 80.1 d | 71.6 c | 66.4 a | 5.8 a | 2.4 a | 14 c | 2.1 c | 2 a | 6.7 b | 76 a | 17.1 a | 6.54 c | 2级 Grade 2 | |
CV/% | 1.3 | 1.4 | 2.9 | 1.8 | 3.6 | 20.4 | 30.1 | 0 | 2.0 | 0.9 | 5.9 | 3.2 | / | |
泰两优217 | Ⅰ | 79.8 b | 69.1 b | 51.7 e | 6.8 a | 3.2 a | 12 a | 1.3 a | 2 a | 5.2 a | 79 a | 13.2 c | 6.78 c | 普通级 General |
Tailiangyou 217 | Ⅱ | 80.0 b | 71.1 a | 55.6 d | 6.7 a | 3.1 a | 10 ab | 1.2 ab | 2 a | 4.7 b | 80 a | 14.0 bc | 7.18 ab | 普通级 General |
Ⅲ | 81.4 a | 71.3 a | 62.4 c | 6.6 a | 3.1 a | 9 bc | 1.1 b | 2 a | 4.8 ab | 78 a | 14.8 ab | 7.29 a | 普通级 General | |
Ⅳ | 79.5 bc | 69.6 b | 63.9 b | 6.7 a | 3.0 a | 7 cd | 0.7 c | 1 b | 4.9 ab | 80 a | 15.4 a | 7.12 ab | 3级 Grade 3 | |
Ⅴ | 78.9 c | 68.1 c | 64.9 a | 6.6 a | 3.1 a | 6 d | 0.5 d | 1 b | 5.0 ab | 79 a | 15.6 a | 7.01 b | 3级 Grade 3 | |
CV/% | 1.2 | 1.9 | 9.7 | 1.3 | 2.3 | 27.1 | 35.8 | 34.2 | 3.9 | 1.1 | 6.8 | 2.7 | / |
表8 不同播期下优质稻的稻米品质
Table 8 Rice quality of high quality rice under different sowing dates
品种 Cultivar | 播期处理 Sowing date treatment | 糙米率 Brown rice percentage/% | 精米率 Milled rice percentage/% | 整精米率 Head rice percentage/% | 粒长 Kernal length/ mm | 长宽比 Length- width ratio | 垩白粒率 Chalky percentage/% | 垩白度 Chalkiness/% | 透明度 Transparency/ rank | 碱消值 Alkali spreading value/rank | 胶稠度 Gel consistency/ mm | 直链淀粉含量 Amylose content/% | 蛋白质含量 Protein content/% | 综合判定等级 Comprehensive evaluation grade |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
甬优1540 | Ⅰ | 81.2 c | 73.3 b | 61.8 d | 5.6 a | 2.2 a | 23 a | 4.3 a | 2 a | 6.8 b | 76 a | 14.8 c | 6.66 bc | 3级 Grade 3 |
Yongyou 1540 | Ⅱ | 82.9 a | 74.3 a | 63.5 c | 5.6 a | 2.3 a | 20 b | 2.8 b | 2 a | 7.0 a | 75 a | 15.5 b | 7.04 a | 2级 Grade 2 |
Ⅲ | 82.0 b | 73.6 ab | 64.8 bc | 5.7 a | 2.3 a | 18 b | 2.6 bc | 2 a | 7.0 a | 77 a | 16.6 a | 6.96 ab | 2级 Grade 2 | |
Ⅳ | 81.3 c | 73.5 ab | 65.8 ab | 5.8 a | 2.4 a | 15 c | 2.4 bc | 2 a | 6.8 b | 76 a | 16.7 a | 6.65 bc | 2级 Grade 2 | |
Ⅴ | 80.1 d | 71.6 c | 66.4 a | 5.8 a | 2.4 a | 14 c | 2.1 c | 2 a | 6.7 b | 76 a | 17.1 a | 6.54 c | 2级 Grade 2 | |
CV/% | 1.3 | 1.4 | 2.9 | 1.8 | 3.6 | 20.4 | 30.1 | 0 | 2.0 | 0.9 | 5.9 | 3.2 | / | |
泰两优217 | Ⅰ | 79.8 b | 69.1 b | 51.7 e | 6.8 a | 3.2 a | 12 a | 1.3 a | 2 a | 5.2 a | 79 a | 13.2 c | 6.78 c | 普通级 General |
Tailiangyou 217 | Ⅱ | 80.0 b | 71.1 a | 55.6 d | 6.7 a | 3.1 a | 10 ab | 1.2 ab | 2 a | 4.7 b | 80 a | 14.0 bc | 7.18 ab | 普通级 General |
Ⅲ | 81.4 a | 71.3 a | 62.4 c | 6.6 a | 3.1 a | 9 bc | 1.1 b | 2 a | 4.8 ab | 78 a | 14.8 ab | 7.29 a | 普通级 General | |
Ⅳ | 79.5 bc | 69.6 b | 63.9 b | 6.7 a | 3.0 a | 7 cd | 0.7 c | 1 b | 4.9 ab | 80 a | 15.4 a | 7.12 ab | 3级 Grade 3 | |
Ⅴ | 78.9 c | 68.1 c | 64.9 a | 6.6 a | 3.1 a | 6 d | 0.5 d | 1 b | 5.0 ab | 79 a | 15.6 a | 7.01 b | 3级 Grade 3 | |
CV/% | 1.2 | 1.9 | 9.7 | 1.3 | 2.3 | 27.1 | 35.8 | 34.2 | 3.9 | 1.1 | 6.8 | 2.7 | / |
品种 Cultivar | 播期处理 Sowing date treatment | 播种-齐穗期 S-F | 齐穗-成熟期 F-M | 全生育期Whole growth period | 有效积温 生产效率 PEEAT/(kg· hm-2·℃-1·d-1) | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
日均温 MDT/℃ | 平均气温 日较差 MDTR/℃ | 有效积温 EAT/ (℃·d) | 日照时数 SH/h | 降雨量 RA/mm | 日均温 MDT/℃ | 平均气温 日较差 MDTR/℃ | 有效积温 EAT/ (℃·d) | 日照时数 SH/h | 降雨量 RA/mm | 日均温 MDT/℃ | 平均气温 日较差 MDTR/℃ | 有效积温 EAT/ (℃·d) | 日照时数 SH/h | 降雨量 RA/mm | |||
甬优1540 | Ⅰ | 25.8 | 7.86 | 1 713.5 | 589.6 | 1 236.6 | 27.1 | 9.32 | 806.3 | 344.8 | 125.1 | 26.2 | 8.33 | 2 519.8 | 934.4 | 1 361.7 | 4.36 |
Yongyou 1540 | Ⅱ | 26.3 | 7.56 | 1 748.6 | 544.9 | 1 218.9 | 27.9 | 9.67 | 823.2 | 384.0 | 110.9 | 26.8 | 8.28 | 2 571.8 | 928.9 | 1 329.8 | 4.46 |
Ⅲ | 26.6 | 7.52 | 1 690.0 | 542.1 | 1 151.9 | 26.8 | 8.98 | 821.2 | 361.5 | 165.8 | 26.6 | 8.05 | 2 511.2 | 903.6 | 1 317.7 | 4.61 | |
Ⅳ | 27.3 | 7.89 | 1 678.1 | 584.2 | 987.8 | 25.5 | 8.39 | 777.4 | 322.4 | 181.9 | 26.7 | 8.12 | 2 455.5 | 906.6 | 1 169.7 | 4.55 | |
Ⅴ | 27.7 | 8.12 | 1 615.1 | 582.2 | 900.2 | 24.4 | 7.95 | 734.1 | 300.5 | 192.6 | 26.5 | 8.11 | 2 349.2 | 882.7 | 1 092.8 | 4.71 | |
平均值 | 26.7 | 7.79 | 1 689.1 | 568.6 | 1 099.1 | 26.3 | 8.86 | 792.4 | 342.6 | 155.3 | 26.6 | 8.18 | 2 481.5 | 911.2 | 1 254.3 | 4.54 | |
Average | |||||||||||||||||
CV/% | 2.9 | 3.2 | 2.9 | 4.1 | 13.5 | 5.3 | 7.8 | 4.7 | 9.5 | 23.0 | 0.9 | 1.5 | 3.4 | 2.3 | 9.3 | 3.0 | |
泰两优217 | Ⅰ | 25.7 | 7.88 | 1 497.1 | 583.0 | 1 128.2 | 27.9 | 8.56 | 603.2 | 262.7 | 232.7 | 26.3 | 8.11 | 2 100.3 | 845.7 | 1 360.9 | 4.13 |
Tailiangyou 217 | Ⅱ | 26.3 | 7.54 | 1 488.9 | 537.2 | 1 218.9 | 27.6 | 9.24 | 686.2 | 348.9 | 109.7 | 26.7 | 8.19 | 2 175.1 | 886.1 | 1 328.6 | 4.30 |
Ⅲ | 26.5 | 7.50 | 1 469.2 | 532.4 | 1 151.9 | 26.8 | 9.27 | 726.5 | 366.1 | 153.5 | 26.6 | 8.06 | 2 195.7 | 898.5 | 1 305.4 | 4.34 | |
Ⅳ | 27.3 | 8.01 | 1 534.0 | 612.4 | 990.8 | 24.6 | 7.93 | 642.9 | 302.8 | 192.6 | 26.4 | 8.04 | 2 176.9 | 915.2 | 1 183.4 | 4.13 | |
Ⅴ | 27.8 | 8.07 | 1 562.1 | 630.2 | 912.9 | 22.5 | 7.95 | 566.8 | 297.9 | 207.2 | 25.9 | 8.08 | 2 128.9 | 928.1 | 1 120.1 | 3.96 | |
平均值 | 26.7 | 7.80 | 1 510.3 | 579.0 | 1 080.5 | 25.9 | 8.59 | 645.1 | 315.7 | 179.1 | 26.4 | 8.10 | 2 155.4 | 894.7 | 1 259.7 | 4.17 | |
Average | |||||||||||||||||
CV/% | 3.1 | 3.4 | 2.5 | 7.6 | 11.6 | 8.8 | 7.7 | 9.9 | 13.2 | 26.9 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 1.8 | 3.5 | 8.2 | 3.7 |
表9 不同播期下优质稻各生育期的气候因子
Table 9 Climatic factors in different growth stages of high quality rice under different sowing dates
品种 Cultivar | 播期处理 Sowing date treatment | 播种-齐穗期 S-F | 齐穗-成熟期 F-M | 全生育期Whole growth period | 有效积温 生产效率 PEEAT/(kg· hm-2·℃-1·d-1) | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
日均温 MDT/℃ | 平均气温 日较差 MDTR/℃ | 有效积温 EAT/ (℃·d) | 日照时数 SH/h | 降雨量 RA/mm | 日均温 MDT/℃ | 平均气温 日较差 MDTR/℃ | 有效积温 EAT/ (℃·d) | 日照时数 SH/h | 降雨量 RA/mm | 日均温 MDT/℃ | 平均气温 日较差 MDTR/℃ | 有效积温 EAT/ (℃·d) | 日照时数 SH/h | 降雨量 RA/mm | |||
甬优1540 | Ⅰ | 25.8 | 7.86 | 1 713.5 | 589.6 | 1 236.6 | 27.1 | 9.32 | 806.3 | 344.8 | 125.1 | 26.2 | 8.33 | 2 519.8 | 934.4 | 1 361.7 | 4.36 |
Yongyou 1540 | Ⅱ | 26.3 | 7.56 | 1 748.6 | 544.9 | 1 218.9 | 27.9 | 9.67 | 823.2 | 384.0 | 110.9 | 26.8 | 8.28 | 2 571.8 | 928.9 | 1 329.8 | 4.46 |
Ⅲ | 26.6 | 7.52 | 1 690.0 | 542.1 | 1 151.9 | 26.8 | 8.98 | 821.2 | 361.5 | 165.8 | 26.6 | 8.05 | 2 511.2 | 903.6 | 1 317.7 | 4.61 | |
Ⅳ | 27.3 | 7.89 | 1 678.1 | 584.2 | 987.8 | 25.5 | 8.39 | 777.4 | 322.4 | 181.9 | 26.7 | 8.12 | 2 455.5 | 906.6 | 1 169.7 | 4.55 | |
Ⅴ | 27.7 | 8.12 | 1 615.1 | 582.2 | 900.2 | 24.4 | 7.95 | 734.1 | 300.5 | 192.6 | 26.5 | 8.11 | 2 349.2 | 882.7 | 1 092.8 | 4.71 | |
平均值 | 26.7 | 7.79 | 1 689.1 | 568.6 | 1 099.1 | 26.3 | 8.86 | 792.4 | 342.6 | 155.3 | 26.6 | 8.18 | 2 481.5 | 911.2 | 1 254.3 | 4.54 | |
Average | |||||||||||||||||
CV/% | 2.9 | 3.2 | 2.9 | 4.1 | 13.5 | 5.3 | 7.8 | 4.7 | 9.5 | 23.0 | 0.9 | 1.5 | 3.4 | 2.3 | 9.3 | 3.0 | |
泰两优217 | Ⅰ | 25.7 | 7.88 | 1 497.1 | 583.0 | 1 128.2 | 27.9 | 8.56 | 603.2 | 262.7 | 232.7 | 26.3 | 8.11 | 2 100.3 | 845.7 | 1 360.9 | 4.13 |
Tailiangyou 217 | Ⅱ | 26.3 | 7.54 | 1 488.9 | 537.2 | 1 218.9 | 27.6 | 9.24 | 686.2 | 348.9 | 109.7 | 26.7 | 8.19 | 2 175.1 | 886.1 | 1 328.6 | 4.30 |
Ⅲ | 26.5 | 7.50 | 1 469.2 | 532.4 | 1 151.9 | 26.8 | 9.27 | 726.5 | 366.1 | 153.5 | 26.6 | 8.06 | 2 195.7 | 898.5 | 1 305.4 | 4.34 | |
Ⅳ | 27.3 | 8.01 | 1 534.0 | 612.4 | 990.8 | 24.6 | 7.93 | 642.9 | 302.8 | 192.6 | 26.4 | 8.04 | 2 176.9 | 915.2 | 1 183.4 | 4.13 | |
Ⅴ | 27.8 | 8.07 | 1 562.1 | 630.2 | 912.9 | 22.5 | 7.95 | 566.8 | 297.9 | 207.2 | 25.9 | 8.08 | 2 128.9 | 928.1 | 1 120.1 | 3.96 | |
平均值 | 26.7 | 7.80 | 1 510.3 | 579.0 | 1 080.5 | 25.9 | 8.59 | 645.1 | 315.7 | 179.1 | 26.4 | 8.10 | 2 155.4 | 894.7 | 1 259.7 | 4.17 | |
Average | |||||||||||||||||
CV/% | 3.1 | 3.4 | 2.5 | 7.6 | 11.6 | 8.8 | 7.7 | 9.9 | 13.2 | 26.9 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 1.8 | 3.5 | 8.2 | 3.7 |
品种 Cultivar | 生育时期 Growth stage | 气候因子 Climatic factors | 有效穗数 Number of productive panicles | 每穗粒数 Spikelets number per panicle | 结实率 Seed-setting rate | 千粒重 1 000-grain weight | 产量 Grain yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
甬优1540 | 播种-齐穗期 | 日均温MDT | 0.377 | -0.052 | -0.967** | -0.328 | -0.441 |
Yongyou 1540 | S-F | 平均气温日较差MDTR | -0.463 | -0.788 | -0.744 | -0.946* | -0.969** |
有效积温EAT | 0.102 | 0.862* | 0.934* | 0.560 | 0.748 | ||
日照时数SH | -0.725 | 0.925* | -0.434 | -0.978** | -0.883* | ||
降雨量RA | -0.174 | 0.262 | 0.697 | 0.514 | 0.616 | ||
齐穗-成熟期 | 日均温MDT | 0.069 | 0.477 | 0.980** | 0.649 | 0.868* | |
F-M | 平均气温日较差MDTR | 0.006 | 0.414 | 0.985** | 0.577 | 0.901* | |
有效积温EAT | 0.137 | 0.535 | 0.923* | 0.758 | 0.953** | ||
日照时数SH | 0.329 | 0.829* | 0.891* | 0.828 | 0.920* | ||
降雨量RA | 0.116 | -0.258 | -0.932* | -0.366 | -0.510 | ||
全生育期 | 日均温MDT | 0.969** | 0.855* | -0.106 | 0.582 | 0.622 | |
Whole growth | 平均气温日较差MDTR | -0.466 | -0.219 | 0.699 | -0.181 | 0.006 | |
period | 有效积温EAT | 0.120 | 0.506 | 0.951** | 0.661 | 0.913* | |
日照时数SH | -0.288 | 0.069 | 0.913* | 0.211 | 0.830* | ||
降雨量RA | -0.186 | 0.255 | 0.782 | 0.542 | 0.627 | ||
泰两优217 | 播种-齐穗期 | 日均温MDT | 0.678 | 0.519 | -0.986** | -0.596 | -0.293 |
Tailiangyou 217 | S-F | 平均气温日较差MDTR | -0.002 | 0.322 | -0.572 | -0.911* | -0.860* |
有效积温EAT | 0.181 | -0.068 | -0.787 | -0.922* | -0.762 | ||
日照时数SH | 0.086 | -0.214 | -0.673 | -0.930* | -0.820 | ||
降雨量RA | -0.375 | -0.136 | 0.806 | 0.804 | 0.662 | ||
齐穗-成熟期 | 日均温MDT | -0.525 | -0.363 | 0.976** | 0.760 | 0.860* | |
F-M | 平均气温日较差MDTR | -0.162 | 0.187 | 0.659 | 0.961 | 0.853* | |
有效积温EAT | 0.373 | 0.539 | 0.375 | 0.964** | 0.995** | ||
日照时数SH | 0.539 | 0.782 | -0.007 | 0.722 | 0.871* | ||
降雨量RA | -0.271 | -0.467 | -0.191 | -0.696 | -0.781 | ||
全生育期 | 日均温MDT | -0.076 | 0.174 | 0.639 | 0.963** | 0.898* | |
Whole growth | 平均气温日较差MDTR | -0.630 | -0.422 | 0.578 | 0.240 | 0.080 | |
period | 有效积温EAT | 0.774 | 0.907* | -0.140 | 0.684 | 0.886* | |
日照时数SH | 0.826 | 0.831* | -0.937* | -0.337 | -0.002 | ||
降雨量RA | -0.582 | -0.384 | 0.776 | 0.713 | 0.439 |
表10 气候因子与产量及其构成因素的相关关系
Table 10 Correlation analysis between climatic factors and grain yield and its components
品种 Cultivar | 生育时期 Growth stage | 气候因子 Climatic factors | 有效穗数 Number of productive panicles | 每穗粒数 Spikelets number per panicle | 结实率 Seed-setting rate | 千粒重 1 000-grain weight | 产量 Grain yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
甬优1540 | 播种-齐穗期 | 日均温MDT | 0.377 | -0.052 | -0.967** | -0.328 | -0.441 |
Yongyou 1540 | S-F | 平均气温日较差MDTR | -0.463 | -0.788 | -0.744 | -0.946* | -0.969** |
有效积温EAT | 0.102 | 0.862* | 0.934* | 0.560 | 0.748 | ||
日照时数SH | -0.725 | 0.925* | -0.434 | -0.978** | -0.883* | ||
降雨量RA | -0.174 | 0.262 | 0.697 | 0.514 | 0.616 | ||
齐穗-成熟期 | 日均温MDT | 0.069 | 0.477 | 0.980** | 0.649 | 0.868* | |
F-M | 平均气温日较差MDTR | 0.006 | 0.414 | 0.985** | 0.577 | 0.901* | |
有效积温EAT | 0.137 | 0.535 | 0.923* | 0.758 | 0.953** | ||
日照时数SH | 0.329 | 0.829* | 0.891* | 0.828 | 0.920* | ||
降雨量RA | 0.116 | -0.258 | -0.932* | -0.366 | -0.510 | ||
全生育期 | 日均温MDT | 0.969** | 0.855* | -0.106 | 0.582 | 0.622 | |
Whole growth | 平均气温日较差MDTR | -0.466 | -0.219 | 0.699 | -0.181 | 0.006 | |
period | 有效积温EAT | 0.120 | 0.506 | 0.951** | 0.661 | 0.913* | |
日照时数SH | -0.288 | 0.069 | 0.913* | 0.211 | 0.830* | ||
降雨量RA | -0.186 | 0.255 | 0.782 | 0.542 | 0.627 | ||
泰两优217 | 播种-齐穗期 | 日均温MDT | 0.678 | 0.519 | -0.986** | -0.596 | -0.293 |
Tailiangyou 217 | S-F | 平均气温日较差MDTR | -0.002 | 0.322 | -0.572 | -0.911* | -0.860* |
有效积温EAT | 0.181 | -0.068 | -0.787 | -0.922* | -0.762 | ||
日照时数SH | 0.086 | -0.214 | -0.673 | -0.930* | -0.820 | ||
降雨量RA | -0.375 | -0.136 | 0.806 | 0.804 | 0.662 | ||
齐穗-成熟期 | 日均温MDT | -0.525 | -0.363 | 0.976** | 0.760 | 0.860* | |
F-M | 平均气温日较差MDTR | -0.162 | 0.187 | 0.659 | 0.961 | 0.853* | |
有效积温EAT | 0.373 | 0.539 | 0.375 | 0.964** | 0.995** | ||
日照时数SH | 0.539 | 0.782 | -0.007 | 0.722 | 0.871* | ||
降雨量RA | -0.271 | -0.467 | -0.191 | -0.696 | -0.781 | ||
全生育期 | 日均温MDT | -0.076 | 0.174 | 0.639 | 0.963** | 0.898* | |
Whole growth | 平均气温日较差MDTR | -0.630 | -0.422 | 0.578 | 0.240 | 0.080 | |
period | 有效积温EAT | 0.774 | 0.907* | -0.140 | 0.684 | 0.886* | |
日照时数SH | 0.826 | 0.831* | -0.937* | -0.337 | -0.002 | ||
降雨量RA | -0.582 | -0.384 | 0.776 | 0.713 | 0.439 |
品种 Cultivar | 生育时期 Growth stage | 气候因子 Climatic factors | 糙米率 Brown rice percentage | 精米率 Milled rice percentage | 整精米率 Head rice percentage | 垩白粒率 Chalky percentage | 垩白度 Chalkiness | 碱消值 Alkali spreading value | 胶稠度 Gel consistency | 直链淀粉 含量 Amylose content | 蛋白质 含量 Protein content |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
甬优1540 | 灌浆前期 | 日均温MDT | 0.732 | 0.519 | -0.677 | 0.699 | 0.390 | 0.634 | -0.478 | -0.655 | 0.692 |
Yongyou | Early grain | 日均最高气温MAXT | 0.563 | 0.555 | -0.904* | 0.883* | 0.685 | 0.465 | -0.542 | -0.894* | 0.506 |
1540 | filling period | 日均最低气温MINT | 0.761 | 0.300 | 0.132 | 0.000 | -0.380 | 0.746 | 0.000 | 0.157 | 0.787 |
平均气温日较差MDTR | 0.496 | 0.535 | -0.937* | 0.902* | 0.880* | 0.397 | -0.554 | -0.930* | 0.435 | ||
有效积温EAT | 0.735 | 0.546 | -0.707 | 0.747 | 0.446 | 0.658 | -0.398 | -0.683 | 0.704 | ||
日照时数SH | 0.568 | 0.550 | -0.906* | 0.908* | 0.909* | 0.492 | -0.439 | -0.888* | 0.524 | ||
降雨量RA | -0.511 | -0.492 | 0.823 | -0.815 | -0.628 | -0.381 | 0.672 | 0.818 | -0.439 | ||
灌浆后期 | 日均温MDT | 0.633 | 0.840 | -0.847 | 0.936* | 0.778 | 0.646 | -0.140 | -0.823 | 0.617 | |
Late grain | 日均最高气温MAXT | 0.700 | 0.899* | -0.789 | -0.896* | 0.708 | 0.718 | -0.120 | -0.821 | 0.688 | |
filling period | 日均最低气温MINT | 0.591 | 0.813 | -0.893* | 0.949* | 0.810 | 0.608 | -0.119 | -0.896* | 0.576 | |
平均气温日较差MDTR | 0.887* | 0.963** | -0.482 | 0.640 | 0.360 | 0.917* | -0.055 | -0.535 | 0.889* | ||
有效积温EAT | 0.922* | 0.973** | -0.401 | 0.562 | 0.259 | 0.946* | -0.069 | -0.457 | 0.923* | ||
日照时数SH | 0.934* | 0.813 | -0.072 | 0.251 | -0.088 | 0.963** | -0.002 | -0.133 | 0.948* | ||
降雨量RA | -0.688 | -0.953* | 0.574 | -0.715 | -0.551 | -0.743 | -0.019 | -0.635 | -0.689 | ||
灌浆期 | 日均温MDT | 0.676 | 0.836 | -0.843 | 0.936* | 0.750 | 0.683 | -0.159 | -0.804 | 0.660 | |
Grain filling | 日均最高气温MAXT | 0.697 | 0.851 | -0.844 | 0.927* | 0.730 | 0.691 | -0.219 | -0.809 | 0.675 | |
period | 日均最低气温MINT | 0.619 | 0.832 | -0.851 | 0.940* | 0.788 | 0.635 | -0.126 | -0.855 | 0.604 | |
平均气温日较差MDTR | 0.799 | 0.867 | -0.792 | 0.864 | 0.607 | 0.760 | -0.346 | -0.819 | 0.765 | ||
有效积温EAT | 0.943* | 0.952* | -0.482 | 0.630 | 0.309 | 0.950* | -0.134 | -0.529 | 0.938* | ||
日照时数SH | 0.951* | 0.899* | -0.550 | 0.673 | 0.332 | 0.929* | -0.244 | -0.581 | 0.936* | ||
降雨量RA | -0.637 | -0.705 | 0.897* | -0.894* | -0.689 | -0.548 | 0.544 | 0.912* | -0.578 | ||
泰两优217 | 灌浆前期 | 日均温MDT | 0.812 | 0.833 | -0.723 | 0.173 | 0.604 | -0.379 | -0.045 | -0.756 | 0.154 |
Tailiangyou | Early grain | 日均最高气温MAXT | 0.902* | 0.653 | -0.854 | -0.071 | 0.373 | -0.377 | 0.077 | -0.840 | -0.013 |
217 | filling period | 日均最低气温MINT | 0.709 | 0.786 | -0.601 | 0.199 | 0.576 | -0.227 | -0.006 | -0.648 | 0.150 |
平均气温日较差MDTR | 0.499 | 0.097 | -0.550 | -0.284 | -0.058 | -0.286 | -0.049 | -0.493 | -0.171 | ||
有效积温EAT | 0.870 | 0.837 | -0.722 | 0.176 | 0.607 | -0.391 | -0.037 | -0.753 | 0.161 | ||
日照时数SH | 0.548 | 0.231 | -0.489 | -0.106 | 0.124 | -0.420 | -0.085 | -0.453 | -0.024 | ||
降雨量RA | -0.531 | -0.508 | -0.237 | -0.596 | 0.532 | 0.911* | -0.348 | -0.326 | -0.788 | ||
灌浆后期 | 日均温MDT | 0.747 | 0.642 | -0.858 | -0.086 | 0.379 | -0.123 | -0.089 | -0.899* | -0.131 | |
Late grain | 日均最高气温MAXT | 0.787 | 0.889* | -0.798 | 0.035 | 0.488 | -0.226 | -0.104 | -0.842 | -0.010 | |
filling period | 日均最低气温MINT | 0.687 | 0.545 | -0.901* | -0.205 | 0.264 | -0.007 | -0.071 | -0.940* | -0.250 | |
平均气温日较差MDTR | 0.879* | 0.985** | -0.142 | 0.885* | 0.969** | -0.800 | -0.161 | -0.183 | 0.730 | ||
有效积温EAT | 0.520 | 0.891* | 0.177 | 0.913* | 0.987** | -0.779 | -0.232 | -0.121 | 0.897* | ||
日照时数SH | 0.323 | 0.739 | 0.458 | 0.989** | 0.917* | -0.791 | -0.186 | -0.418 | 0.952* | ||
降雨量RA | -0.690 | -0.821 | 0.559 | -0.305 | -0.685 | 0.313 | 0.275 | 0.638 | -0.200 | ||
灌浆期 | 日均温MDT | 0.776 | 0.677 | -0.846 | -0.051 | 0.412 | -0.166 | -0.063 | -0.883* | -0.086 | |
Grain filling | 日均最高气温MAXT | 0.817 | 0.715 | -0.832 | -0.003 | 0.459 | -0.242 | -0.069 | -0.846 | -0.029 | |
period | 日均最低气温MINT | 0.723 | 0.614 | -0.806 | 0.125 | 0.337 | -0.068 | -0.044 | -0.904* | -0.166 | |
平均气温日较差MDTR | 0.923* | 0.846 | -0.582 | 0.321 | 0.689 | -0.677 | -0.088 | -0.590 | 0.351 | ||
有效积温EAT | 0.672 | 0.964** | -0.063 | 0.793 | 0.976** | -0.745 | -0.200 | -0.117 | 0.883* | ||
日照时数SH | 0.542 | 0.815 | 0.242 | 0.917* | 0.943* | -0.944* | -0.216 | 0.218 | 0.916* | ||
降雨量RA | -0.805 | -0.846 | 0.046 | -0.684 | -0.804 | 0.975** | -0.188 | 0.002 | -0.810 |
表11 灌浆期气候因子与稻米主要品质指标的相关关系
Table 11 Correlation analysis between climatic factors during grain filling period and main quality indexes of rice
品种 Cultivar | 生育时期 Growth stage | 气候因子 Climatic factors | 糙米率 Brown rice percentage | 精米率 Milled rice percentage | 整精米率 Head rice percentage | 垩白粒率 Chalky percentage | 垩白度 Chalkiness | 碱消值 Alkali spreading value | 胶稠度 Gel consistency | 直链淀粉 含量 Amylose content | 蛋白质 含量 Protein content |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
甬优1540 | 灌浆前期 | 日均温MDT | 0.732 | 0.519 | -0.677 | 0.699 | 0.390 | 0.634 | -0.478 | -0.655 | 0.692 |
Yongyou | Early grain | 日均最高气温MAXT | 0.563 | 0.555 | -0.904* | 0.883* | 0.685 | 0.465 | -0.542 | -0.894* | 0.506 |
1540 | filling period | 日均最低气温MINT | 0.761 | 0.300 | 0.132 | 0.000 | -0.380 | 0.746 | 0.000 | 0.157 | 0.787 |
平均气温日较差MDTR | 0.496 | 0.535 | -0.937* | 0.902* | 0.880* | 0.397 | -0.554 | -0.930* | 0.435 | ||
有效积温EAT | 0.735 | 0.546 | -0.707 | 0.747 | 0.446 | 0.658 | -0.398 | -0.683 | 0.704 | ||
日照时数SH | 0.568 | 0.550 | -0.906* | 0.908* | 0.909* | 0.492 | -0.439 | -0.888* | 0.524 | ||
降雨量RA | -0.511 | -0.492 | 0.823 | -0.815 | -0.628 | -0.381 | 0.672 | 0.818 | -0.439 | ||
灌浆后期 | 日均温MDT | 0.633 | 0.840 | -0.847 | 0.936* | 0.778 | 0.646 | -0.140 | -0.823 | 0.617 | |
Late grain | 日均最高气温MAXT | 0.700 | 0.899* | -0.789 | -0.896* | 0.708 | 0.718 | -0.120 | -0.821 | 0.688 | |
filling period | 日均最低气温MINT | 0.591 | 0.813 | -0.893* | 0.949* | 0.810 | 0.608 | -0.119 | -0.896* | 0.576 | |
平均气温日较差MDTR | 0.887* | 0.963** | -0.482 | 0.640 | 0.360 | 0.917* | -0.055 | -0.535 | 0.889* | ||
有效积温EAT | 0.922* | 0.973** | -0.401 | 0.562 | 0.259 | 0.946* | -0.069 | -0.457 | 0.923* | ||
日照时数SH | 0.934* | 0.813 | -0.072 | 0.251 | -0.088 | 0.963** | -0.002 | -0.133 | 0.948* | ||
降雨量RA | -0.688 | -0.953* | 0.574 | -0.715 | -0.551 | -0.743 | -0.019 | -0.635 | -0.689 | ||
灌浆期 | 日均温MDT | 0.676 | 0.836 | -0.843 | 0.936* | 0.750 | 0.683 | -0.159 | -0.804 | 0.660 | |
Grain filling | 日均最高气温MAXT | 0.697 | 0.851 | -0.844 | 0.927* | 0.730 | 0.691 | -0.219 | -0.809 | 0.675 | |
period | 日均最低气温MINT | 0.619 | 0.832 | -0.851 | 0.940* | 0.788 | 0.635 | -0.126 | -0.855 | 0.604 | |
平均气温日较差MDTR | 0.799 | 0.867 | -0.792 | 0.864 | 0.607 | 0.760 | -0.346 | -0.819 | 0.765 | ||
有效积温EAT | 0.943* | 0.952* | -0.482 | 0.630 | 0.309 | 0.950* | -0.134 | -0.529 | 0.938* | ||
日照时数SH | 0.951* | 0.899* | -0.550 | 0.673 | 0.332 | 0.929* | -0.244 | -0.581 | 0.936* | ||
降雨量RA | -0.637 | -0.705 | 0.897* | -0.894* | -0.689 | -0.548 | 0.544 | 0.912* | -0.578 | ||
泰两优217 | 灌浆前期 | 日均温MDT | 0.812 | 0.833 | -0.723 | 0.173 | 0.604 | -0.379 | -0.045 | -0.756 | 0.154 |
Tailiangyou | Early grain | 日均最高气温MAXT | 0.902* | 0.653 | -0.854 | -0.071 | 0.373 | -0.377 | 0.077 | -0.840 | -0.013 |
217 | filling period | 日均最低气温MINT | 0.709 | 0.786 | -0.601 | 0.199 | 0.576 | -0.227 | -0.006 | -0.648 | 0.150 |
平均气温日较差MDTR | 0.499 | 0.097 | -0.550 | -0.284 | -0.058 | -0.286 | -0.049 | -0.493 | -0.171 | ||
有效积温EAT | 0.870 | 0.837 | -0.722 | 0.176 | 0.607 | -0.391 | -0.037 | -0.753 | 0.161 | ||
日照时数SH | 0.548 | 0.231 | -0.489 | -0.106 | 0.124 | -0.420 | -0.085 | -0.453 | -0.024 | ||
降雨量RA | -0.531 | -0.508 | -0.237 | -0.596 | 0.532 | 0.911* | -0.348 | -0.326 | -0.788 | ||
灌浆后期 | 日均温MDT | 0.747 | 0.642 | -0.858 | -0.086 | 0.379 | -0.123 | -0.089 | -0.899* | -0.131 | |
Late grain | 日均最高气温MAXT | 0.787 | 0.889* | -0.798 | 0.035 | 0.488 | -0.226 | -0.104 | -0.842 | -0.010 | |
filling period | 日均最低气温MINT | 0.687 | 0.545 | -0.901* | -0.205 | 0.264 | -0.007 | -0.071 | -0.940* | -0.250 | |
平均气温日较差MDTR | 0.879* | 0.985** | -0.142 | 0.885* | 0.969** | -0.800 | -0.161 | -0.183 | 0.730 | ||
有效积温EAT | 0.520 | 0.891* | 0.177 | 0.913* | 0.987** | -0.779 | -0.232 | -0.121 | 0.897* | ||
日照时数SH | 0.323 | 0.739 | 0.458 | 0.989** | 0.917* | -0.791 | -0.186 | -0.418 | 0.952* | ||
降雨量RA | -0.690 | -0.821 | 0.559 | -0.305 | -0.685 | 0.313 | 0.275 | 0.638 | -0.200 | ||
灌浆期 | 日均温MDT | 0.776 | 0.677 | -0.846 | -0.051 | 0.412 | -0.166 | -0.063 | -0.883* | -0.086 | |
Grain filling | 日均最高气温MAXT | 0.817 | 0.715 | -0.832 | -0.003 | 0.459 | -0.242 | -0.069 | -0.846 | -0.029 | |
period | 日均最低气温MINT | 0.723 | 0.614 | -0.806 | 0.125 | 0.337 | -0.068 | -0.044 | -0.904* | -0.166 | |
平均气温日较差MDTR | 0.923* | 0.846 | -0.582 | 0.321 | 0.689 | -0.677 | -0.088 | -0.590 | 0.351 | ||
有效积温EAT | 0.672 | 0.964** | -0.063 | 0.793 | 0.976** | -0.745 | -0.200 | -0.117 | 0.883* | ||
日照时数SH | 0.542 | 0.815 | 0.242 | 0.917* | 0.943* | -0.944* | -0.216 | 0.218 | 0.916* | ||
降雨量RA | -0.805 | -0.846 | 0.046 | -0.684 | -0.804 | 0.975** | -0.188 | 0.002 | -0.810 |
[1] |
RAOUFI R S, SOUFIZADEH S, LARIJANI B A, et al. Simulation of growth and yield of various irrigated rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes by AquaCrop under different seedling ages[J]. Natural Resource Modeling, 2018, 31(2): e12162.
DOI URL |
[2] |
YU Y Q, HUANG Y, ZHANG W. Changes in rice yields in China since 1980 associated with cultivar improvement, climate and crop management[J]. Field Crops Research, 2012, 136: 65-75.
DOI URL |
[3] |
XU J L, XING Y Z, XU Y B, et al. Breeding by design for future rice: genes and genome technologies[J]. The Crop Journal, 2021, 9(3): 491-496.
DOI URL |
[4] | 徐春春, 纪龙, 李凤博, 等. 当前我国水稻产业发展形势与战略对策[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2022, 41(1): 21-27. |
XU C C, JI L, LI F B, et al. Situation and strategies of rice industry development in China[J]. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University, 2022, 41(1): 21-27. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[5] | 曾波, 钟育海, 郭利磊, 等. 我国优质水稻品种发展现状与展望[J]. 种子, 2019, 38(8): 53-56. |
ZENG B, ZHONG Y H, GUO L L, et al. Development status and prospect of high quality rice varieties in China[J]. Seed, 2019, 38(8): 53-56. (in Chinese) | |
[6] | 彭福燕, 杨罗浩, 高俊阳, 等. 播期及秧龄对湖北二季晚粳产量和品质的影响[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2021, 40(3): 105-112. |
PENG F Y, YANG L H, GAO J Y, et al. Effects of sowing date and seedling age on the yield and quality of two-season late Japonica rice in Hubei Province[J]. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University, 2021, 40(3): 105-112. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[7] | 雷振山, 李猛, 祁玲, 等. 不同播期对豫南直播稻米品质的影响[J]. 河南农业大学学报, 2021, 55(4): 654-660. |
LEI Z S, LI M, QI L, et al. Effects of different sowing date on grain quality of direct seeding rice in southern Henan[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural University, 2021, 55(4): 654-660. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[8] |
曾仁杰. 不同播期对优质稻玉针香产量及稻米品质的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2020, 26(6): 100-103.
DOI |
ZENG R J. Effects of different sowing dates on the yield and grain quality of Yuzhenxiang[J]. China Rice, 2020, 26(6): 100-103. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI |
|
[9] |
施俊生, 王仁杯, 郁晓敏, 等. 浙江省水稻品种发展现状与对策[J]. 中国稻米, 2019, 25(1): 23-25.
DOI |
SHI J S, WANG R B, YU X M, et al. Current situation and countermeasure of rice varieties in Zhejiang[J]. China Rice, 2019, 25(1): 23-25. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI |
|
[10] |
秦叶波, 黄玉韬, 徐春春, 等. 浙江省水稻产加销一体化发展研究[J]. 中国稻米, 2022, 28(1): 82-86.
DOI |
QIN Y B, HUANG Y T, XU C C, et al. Study on the development of integrated of rice production and marketing in Zhejiang Province[J]. China Rice, 2022, 28(1): 82-86. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI |
|
[11] | 张光伟, 张光进. 优质稻品种甬优17的示范表现及高产栽培技术分析[J]. 南方农业, 2015, 9(30): 71. |
ZHANG G W, ZHANG G J. Demonstration performance and high-yield cultivation techniques of high-quality rice variety Yongyou 17[J]. South China Agriculture, 2015, 9(30): 71. (in Chinese) | |
[12] | 李诚永, 李韵, 吴汉平, 等. 优质稻甬优15在衢州市的种植表现及加工效益分析[J]. 现代农业科技, 2021(3): 56-57. |
LI C Y, LI Y, WU H P, et al. Planting performance and processing benefit analysis of high quality rice Yongyou 15 in Quzhou City[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021(3): 56-57. (in Chinese) | |
[13] | 方文英, 沈兴连, 莫红华, 等. 2018年杭州市余杭区优质稻新品种比较试验[J]. 现代农业科技, 2019(12): 29. |
FANG W Y, SHEN X L, MO H H, et al. Comparative experiment of new rice varieties with good quality in Yuhang District of Hangzhou in 2018[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019(12): 29. (in Chinese) | |
[14] | 邢志鹏, 曹伟伟, 钱海军, 等. 播期对不同类型机插稻产量及光合物质生产特性的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2015, 29(3): 528-537. |
XING Z P, CAO W W, QIAN H J, et al. Effect of sowing date on yield and characteristics of photosynthesis and matter production of different types in mechanical transplanted rice[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 29(3): 528-537. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[15] | 江晓东, 吕润, 金志凤, 等. 浙江地区甬优15直播稻的最佳播期分析[J]. 中国农业气象, 2019, 40(1): 33-40. |
JIANG X D, LV R, JIN Z F, et al. Analyzing on the optimum direct-sowing date for Yongyou15 rice variety in Zhejiang region[J]. Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology, 2019, 40(1): 33-40. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[16] |
ZHOU N B, ZHANG J, FANG S L, et al. Effects of temperature and solar radiation on yield of good eating-quality rice in the lower reaches of the Huai River Basin, China[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(7): 1762-1774.
DOI URL |
[17] | 潘高峰, 汪本福, 陈波, 等. 播期对鄂中北地区不同类型粳稻产量、生育期及温光利用的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2021(4): 105-111. |
PAN G F, WANG B F, CHEN B, et al. Effects of seeding date on yield, growth period and utilization of temperature and sunshine of different types of Japonica rice in north central of Hubei Province[J]. Crops, 2021(4): 105-111. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[18] | 孙建军, 张洪程, 尹海庆, 等. 不同生态区播期对机插水稻产量、生育期及温光利用的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2015, 31(6): 113-121. |
SUN J J, ZHANG H C, YIN H Q, et al. Effects of seeding date on yield, growth period and utilization of temperature and sunshine of mechanical transplanting rice in different ecological regions[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2015, 31(6): 113-121. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[19] | 黄正, 张荣萍, 陶诗顺, 等. 不同播期对直播杂交稻生育进程和产量的影响[J]. 杂交水稻, 2021, 36(3): 51-55. |
HUANG Z, ZHANG R P, TAO S S, et al. Effects of different sowing dates on growth process and yield of direct seeding hybrid rice[J]. Hybrid Rice, 2021, 36(3): 51-55. (in Chinese) | |
[20] |
王孟佳, 殷敏, 褚光, 等. 长江中下游双季晚粳稻产量、生育时期及温光资源配置的生态性差异[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2021, 35(5): 475-486.
DOI |
WANG M J, YIN M, CHU G, et al. Ecological differences in yield, growth period and the utilization of temperature and light resources of double-cropping late Japonica rice in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2021, 35(5): 475-486. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[21] | 段里成, 张坤, 郭瑞鸽, 等. 江西省双季早稻直播适宜播种期的区域划分[J]. 中国农业气象, 2021, 42(2): 112-122. |
DUAN L C, ZHANG K, GUO R G, et al. Regional division of suitable direct sowing date of double season early rice in Jiangxi Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology, 2021, 42(2): 112-122. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[22] | 孙琪, 耿艳秋, 金峰, 等. 播期对直播水稻产量、花后各器官干物质和氮素积累及转运的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2020(5): 119-126. |
SUN Q, GENG Y Q, JIN F, et al. Effects of sowing dates on yield, dry matter and nitrogen accumulation and translocationin organs after anthesis of direct seeding rice[J]. Crops, 2020(5): 119-126. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[23] | 张业黔, 陆跃飞. 播期对直播稻产量的影响[J]. 耕作与栽培, 2016(3): 57-58. |
ZHANG Y Q, LU Y F. Effects of seeding time on yield of direct seeded rice[J]. Tillage and Cultivation, 2016(3): 57-58. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[24] | 霍中洋, 姚义, 张洪程, 等. 不同播期直播稻氮素吸收、利用效率的差异[J]. 扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2012, 33(4): 39-45. |
HUO Z Y, YAO Y, ZHANG H C, et al. Differences of nitrogen absorption and utilization efficiency in direct seeding rice with different sowing date[J]. Journal of Yangzhou University(Agricultural and Life Science Edition), 2012, 33(4): 39-45. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[25] |
张洪程, 胡雅杰, 杨建昌, 等. 中国特色水稻栽培学发展与展望[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(7): 1301-1321.
DOI |
ZHANG H C, HU Y J, YANG J C, et al. Development and prospect of rice cultivation in China[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(7): 1301-1321. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI |
|
[26] |
WEI H H, MENG T Y, LI C, et al. Comparisons of grain yield and nutrient accumulation and translocation in high-yielding japonica/indica hybrids, indica hybrids, and japonica conventional varieties[J]. Field Crops Research, 2017, 204: 101-109.
DOI URL |
[27] |
董明辉, 陈培峰, 江贻, 等. 江苏太湖地区不同生育类型粳稻品种产量对不同播期气候因子的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(5): 952-963.
DOI |
DONG M H, CHEN P F, JIANG Y, et al. Response of yield of different growth types of Japonica rice varieties to climatic factors at different sowing dates in Taihu region of Jiangsu Province[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(5): 952-963. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[28] | 赵庆勇, 朱镇, 张亚东, 等. 播期和地点对不同生态类型粳稻稻米品质性状的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2013, 27(3): 297-304. |
ZHAO Q Y, ZHU Z, ZHANG Y D, et al. Effects of sowing date and site on grain quality of rice cultivars planted in different ecological types[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2013, 27(3): 297-304. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI |
|
[29] |
DOU Z, TANG S, LI G H, et al. Application of nitrogen fertilizer at heading stage improves rice quality under elevated temperature during grain-filling stage[J]. Crop Science, 2017, 57(4): 2183-2192.
DOI URL |
[30] | 陆佳岚, 王净, 马成, 等. 长江流域中稻产量和品质性状差异与其生育期气象因子的相关性[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2020, 36(6): 1361-1372. |
LU J L, WANG J, MA C, et al. Correlation between the differences in yield and quality traits among various types of middle rice and meteorological factors during growth period in the Yangtze River Basin[J]. Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 36(6): 1361-1372. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[31] |
李辰彦, 李祖军, 田雪飞, 等. 抽穗扬花期低温胁迫对双季晚稻生理特性的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2021, 35(11): 2634-2644.
DOI |
LI C Y, LI Z J, TIAN X F, et al. Effects of low temperature stress at flowering stage on physiological characteristics of double cropping late rice[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 35(11): 2634-2644. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[32] |
成臣, 曾勇军, 吕伟生, 等. 南方稻区优质晚粳稻产量和品质调优的播期效应[J]. 核农学报, 2018, 32(10): 2019-2030.
DOI |
CHENG C, ZENG Y J, LYU W S, et al. Effect of sowing date on rice yield and quality of high-quality Japonica rice during the late-rice cropping seasons in Southern China[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 32(10): 2019-2030. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[33] | 程方民, 钟连进. 不同气候生态条件下稻米品质性状的变异及主要影响因子分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2001, 15(3): 187-191. |
CHENG F M, ZHONG L J. Variation of rice quality traits under different climate conditions and its main affected factors[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2001, 15(3): 187-191. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[34] |
李博, 杨帆, 秦琴, 等. 播期对再生稻次适宜区杂交籼稻食味品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(1): 36-50.
DOI |
LI B, YANG F, QIN Q, et al. Effects of sowing dates on eating quality of different indica hybrid rice in the sub-suitable region of ratoon rice[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(1): 36-50. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI |
|
[35] |
XU Y J, YING Y N, OUYANG S H, et al. Factors affecting sensory quality of cooked japonica rice[J]. Rice Science, 2018, 25(6): 330-339.
DOI URL |
[36] |
张庆, 郭保卫, 胡雅杰, 等. 不同氮肥水平下优质高产软米粳稻的产量与品质差异[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2021, 35(6): 606-616.
DOI |
ZHANG Q, GUO B W, HU Y J, et al. Differences in yield and rice quality of soft Japonica rice with high quality and high yield under different nitrogen levels[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2021, 35(6): 606-616. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI |
|
[37] |
徐栋, 朱盈, 周磊, 等. 不同类型籼粳杂交稻产量和品质性状差异及其与灌浆结实期气候因素间的相关性[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(10): 1548-1559.
DOI |
XU D, ZHU Y, ZHOU L, et al. Differences in yield and grain quality among various types of indica/japonica hybrid rice and correlation between quality and climatic factors during grain filling period[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2018, 44(10): 1548-1559. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
|
[38] |
叶迎, 赵考诚, 马军, 等. 播期和施氮量组合对水稻南粳9108产量和氮素利用的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(5): 879-886.
DOI |
YE Y, ZHAO K C, MA J, et al. Effects of sowing date and nitrogen application rate on grain yield and nitrogen utilization of rice variety Nanjing 9108[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(5): 879-886. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI |
[1] | 柴冠群, 周玮, 梁红, 范菲菲, 朱大雁, 范成五. 叶面喷施锌肥和柠檬酸对辣椒产量、品质与Cd吸收转运的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(5): 1069-1079. |
[2] | 肖立涵, 辛美果, 卢文静, 叶沁, 张岑, 肖朝耿, 谌迪. 不同贮藏条件对3种花粉源蜂王浆品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(5): 1161-1167. |
[3] | 黄正, 张荣萍, 马鹏, 张琪, 周宁宁, 阿什日轨, 冯婷煜, 周林. 冬水田油菜秸秆还田和氮肥运筹对杂交稻干物质积累和产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(5): 983-991. |
[4] | 檀舒霞, 赵桃弟, 杨豪, 宁可君, 刘丽, 何庆元, 黄守程, 舒英杰. 遮阴对10个菜用大豆品种农艺性状、产量和硝态氮代谢的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(4): 729-735. |
[5] | 马新超, 轩正英, 谭占明, 周宇, 王旭峰. 温室沙培黄瓜生产效应的水氮耦合方案优化[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(4): 809-820. |
[6] | 王金凤, 周琦, 吕玉龙, 陈卓梅. 间作景观树种对茶园生态系统与茶叶生产的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(3): 523-533. |
[7] | 王龙威, 白俊艳, 贾小平, 雷莹, 陈梦柯, 樊红灯, 卢小宁, 何豫涵, 曾凡林, 张容恺. 鹌鹑GnRH-1基因多态性与蛋品质的关联分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(3): 565-574. |
[8] | 黄秋伟, 毛立彦, 檀小辉, 王丽萍, 刘功德, 彭继飞, 龙凌云. 贮藏温度对广西旱藕采后重要品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(2): 346-354. |
[9] | 王犇, 李宇星, 李哲, 姜沣溢, 黄正来, 樊永惠, 张文静, 马尚宇. 海藻糖处理对花后高温胁迫弱筋小麦生选6号产量形成及品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(1): 1-9. |
[10] | 尤翠翠, 贺一哲, 徐鹏, 黄亚茹, 王辉, 何海兵, 柯健, 武立权. 高温胁迫对水稻生长发育的伤害效应及其防御对策[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(1): 10-22. |
[11] | 李永晖, 李捷, 冯丽丹, 何静, 张煦, 刘祥林. 不同植物免疫诱抗剂对枸杞鲜果产量、抗病性和贮藏能力的差异比较[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(1): 164-174. |
[12] | 杨胜玲, 黄兴成, 李渝, 刘彦伶, 张雅蓉, 张艳, 张文安, 蒋太明. 长期有机无机肥配施对水稻生长、干物质积累及产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(9): 1815-1825. |
[13] | 茹朝, 郁继华, 武玥, 冯致, 缑兆辉, 金宁, 王舒亚, 刘泽慈, 吕剑. 化肥减量配施生物有机肥对露地大白菜产量及品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(8): 1626-1637. |
[14] | 李旺雄, 张洋, 唐中祺, 郁继华. 平衡施肥对设施基质栽培番茄生长、品质、矿质元素含量与产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(8): 1648-1660. |
[15] | 邹振浩, 孙业良, 赵玉宝, 李鑫, 张丽平, 张兰, 董春旺, 付建玉, 韩文炎, 颜鹏. 采摘花芽对春茶产量与品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(7): 1369-1376. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||