浙江农业学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (9): 1815-1825.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2022.09.01
杨胜玲1(), 黄兴成1,2,*(
), 李渝1,2, 刘彦伶1,2, 张雅蓉1,2, 张艳1, 张文安1,2, 蒋太明2,3,*(
)
收稿日期:
2021-03-01
出版日期:
2022-09-25
发布日期:
2022-09-30
通讯作者:
黄兴成,蒋太明
作者简介:
黄兴成,E-mail: huangxc90@163.com基金资助:
YANG Shengling1(), HUANG Xingcheng1,2,*(
), LI Yu1,2, LIU Yanling1,2, ZHANG Yarong1,2, ZHANG Yan1, ZHANG Wen’an1,2, JIANG Taiming2,3,*(
)
Received:
2021-03-01
Online:
2022-09-25
Published:
2022-09-30
Contact:
HUANG Xingcheng,JIANG Taiming
摘要:
明确不同施肥处理对水稻生长、干物质积累、转运及产量的影响,为水稻的养分综合管理措施提供参考。依托25 a长期定位试验,通过大田试验方法,设置不施肥对照(CK),常规化肥(NPK)、25%有机肥替代化肥(1/4M+3/4NP)、50%有机肥替代化肥(1/2M+1/2NP)、100%有机肥替代化肥(M)和有机无机肥配施(MNPK)6个试验处理,探究不同施肥处理对水稻生长、干物质积累、转运及产量的影响。结果表明,水稻地上部干物质积累量成熟期大小顺序表现为MNPK>1/4M+3/4NP>1/2M+1/2NP>NPK>M>CK,MNPK、1/4M+3/4NP处理分别较NPK处理籽粒增产12.42%、2.04%。水稻籽粒干物质积累量主要来源于花后干物质积累,各处理花后干物质积累量对籽粒贡献率为50.17%~65.40%,其中,施用有机肥各处理显著高于CK和NPK处理。水稻成熟期,施用有机肥的各处理籽粒的比例均较CK和NPK处理高。有机无机肥配施各处理比CK或NPK处理显著促进水稻分蘖、提高叶片叶绿素相对含量(SPAD)值及叶面积指数,同时也显著优化水稻各产量构成因子,增加水稻产量。水稻各农艺性状与有效穗数呈显著或极显著正相关,与千粒重和穗粒数均呈正相关关系。长期施用有机肥条件下,25%的有机肥替代化肥促进水稻生长发育,提高干物质积累、转运,是黄壤性水稻土地区实现水稻增产的最佳施肥措施。
中图分类号:
杨胜玲, 黄兴成, 李渝, 刘彦伶, 张雅蓉, 张艳, 张文安, 蒋太明. 长期有机无机肥配施对水稻生长、干物质积累及产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(9): 1815-1825.
YANG Shengling, HUANG Xingcheng, LI Yu, LIU Yanling, ZHANG Yarong, ZHANG Yan, ZHANG Wen’an, JIANG Taiming. Effects of long-term organic and inorganic fertilizer application on growth, dry matter accumulation and yield of rice[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(9): 1815-1825.
处理 Treatment | 化肥Chemical fertilizer | 有机肥Organic fertilizer | 总量Total nutrient input | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | P2O5 | K2O | N | P2O5 | K2O | N | P2O5 | K2O | |
CK | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
NPK | 165.0 | 82.5 | 82.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 165.0 | 82.5 | 82.5 |
1/4M+3/4NP | 123.8 | 62.7 | 0 | 41.2 | 19.8 | 91.7 | 165.0 | 82.5 | 91.7 |
1/2M+1/2NP | 82.5 | 42.8 | 0 | 82.5 | 39.7 | 183.3 | 165.0 | 82.5 | 183.3 |
M | 0 | 0 | 0 | 165.0 | 79.4 | 366.7 | 165.0 | 79.4 | 366.7 |
MNPK | 165.0 | 82.5 | 82.5 | 165.0 | 79.4 | 366.7 | 330.0 | 161.9 | 449.2 |
表1 1995—2019年不同处理年均肥料施用量
Table 1 Annual fertilizer application amounts under different treatments from 1995 to 2019 kg·hm-2
处理 Treatment | 化肥Chemical fertilizer | 有机肥Organic fertilizer | 总量Total nutrient input | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | P2O5 | K2O | N | P2O5 | K2O | N | P2O5 | K2O | |
CK | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
NPK | 165.0 | 82.5 | 82.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 165.0 | 82.5 | 82.5 |
1/4M+3/4NP | 123.8 | 62.7 | 0 | 41.2 | 19.8 | 91.7 | 165.0 | 82.5 | 91.7 |
1/2M+1/2NP | 82.5 | 42.8 | 0 | 82.5 | 39.7 | 183.3 | 165.0 | 82.5 | 183.3 |
M | 0 | 0 | 0 | 165.0 | 79.4 | 366.7 | 165.0 | 79.4 | 366.7 |
MNPK | 165.0 | 82.5 | 82.5 | 165.0 | 79.4 | 366.7 | 330.0 | 161.9 | 449.2 |
处理 Treatment | pH | 有机质 Organic matter/ (g·kg-1) | 有效磷 Available P/ (mg·kg-1) | 碱解氮 Alkali hydrolyzed N/ (mg·kg-1) | 速效钾 Available K/ (mg·kg-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 7.02 a | 39.70 b | 8.33 d | 116.67 d | 250.00 d |
NPK | 6.74 ab | 48.18 ab | 15.43 c | 122.00 d | 264.33 d |
1/4M+3/4NP | 6.74 ab | 53.15 a | 20.57 b | 168.67 bc | 357.33 b |
1/2M+1/2NP | 6.53 b | 48.57 ab | 16.93 c | 153.33 c | 296.67 c |
M | 6.42 b | 57.24 a | 16.83 c | 188.67 ab | 335.00 b |
MNPK | 6.70 ab | 59.31 a | 32.40 a | 193.33 a | 386.33 a |
表2 试验前土壤理化性质
Table 2 Physical and chemical properties of soil before experiment
处理 Treatment | pH | 有机质 Organic matter/ (g·kg-1) | 有效磷 Available P/ (mg·kg-1) | 碱解氮 Alkali hydrolyzed N/ (mg·kg-1) | 速效钾 Available K/ (mg·kg-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 7.02 a | 39.70 b | 8.33 d | 116.67 d | 250.00 d |
NPK | 6.74 ab | 48.18 ab | 15.43 c | 122.00 d | 264.33 d |
1/4M+3/4NP | 6.74 ab | 53.15 a | 20.57 b | 168.67 bc | 357.33 b |
1/2M+1/2NP | 6.53 b | 48.57 ab | 16.93 c | 153.33 c | 296.67 c |
M | 6.42 b | 57.24 a | 16.83 c | 188.67 ab | 335.00 b |
MNPK | 6.70 ab | 59.31 a | 32.40 a | 193.33 a | 386.33 a |
图2 不同施肥处理下水稻成穗率 柱状图上无相同小写字母的表示各处理间差异显著(P<0.05),下同。
Fig.2 Productive tiller percentage of rice under different fertilization treatments The bars with different lowercase letters represented statistically significant differences (P<0.05) among treatments. The same as below.
施肥处理 Fertilization treatment | 积累量Accumulation amount/(kg·hm-2) | 积累率 Accumulation rate/% | 转运量 Translocation amount/ (kg·hm-2) | 转运率 Translocation rate/% | 对籽粒贡献率 Contribution to grain/% | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
花前 Pre-anthesis | 花后 Post-anthesis | 花前 Pre-anthesis | 花后 Post-anthesis | 转运量 Translocation amount | 花后积累量 Post-anthesis accumulation | |||
CK | 5 375.82 c | 2 295.77 d | 70.11 a | 29.89 c | 1 901.85 b | 34.98 bc | 46.13 ab | 53.87 ab |
NPK | 10 278.77 b | 4 261.73 c | 69.90 ab | 30.10 bc | 4 321.66 ab | 43.12 ab | 49.83 a | 50.17 b |
1/4M+3/4NP | 11 412.17 b | 5 133.61 bc | 68.99 abc | 31.01 abc | 3 912.70 ab | 34.45 bc | 42.83 ab | 57.17 ab |
1/2M+1/2NP | 9 876.58 b | 5 370.54 b | 65.13 bc | 34.87 ab | 2 849.48 b | 28.48 c | 34.60 b | 65.40 a |
M | 10 419.64 b | 4 869.30 bc | 65.74 bc | 34.26 ab | 3 911.21 ab | 41.96 ab | 44.65 ab | 55.35 ab |
MNPK | 15 204.36 a | 6 772.54 a | 61.99 d | 38.01 a | 5 337.00 a | 47.58 a | 43.81 ab | 56.19 ab |
表3 水稻干物质积累及转运情况
Table 3 Dry matter accumulation and transport of rice
施肥处理 Fertilization treatment | 积累量Accumulation amount/(kg·hm-2) | 积累率 Accumulation rate/% | 转运量 Translocation amount/ (kg·hm-2) | 转运率 Translocation rate/% | 对籽粒贡献率 Contribution to grain/% | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
花前 Pre-anthesis | 花后 Post-anthesis | 花前 Pre-anthesis | 花后 Post-anthesis | 转运量 Translocation amount | 花后积累量 Post-anthesis accumulation | |||
CK | 5 375.82 c | 2 295.77 d | 70.11 a | 29.89 c | 1 901.85 b | 34.98 bc | 46.13 ab | 53.87 ab |
NPK | 10 278.77 b | 4 261.73 c | 69.90 ab | 30.10 bc | 4 321.66 ab | 43.12 ab | 49.83 a | 50.17 b |
1/4M+3/4NP | 11 412.17 b | 5 133.61 bc | 68.99 abc | 31.01 abc | 3 912.70 ab | 34.45 bc | 42.83 ab | 57.17 ab |
1/2M+1/2NP | 9 876.58 b | 5 370.54 b | 65.13 bc | 34.87 ab | 2 849.48 b | 28.48 c | 34.60 b | 65.40 a |
M | 10 419.64 b | 4 869.30 bc | 65.74 bc | 34.26 ab | 3 911.21 ab | 41.96 ab | 44.65 ab | 55.35 ab |
MNPK | 15 204.36 a | 6 772.54 a | 61.99 d | 38.01 a | 5 337.00 a | 47.58 a | 43.81 ab | 56.19 ab |
图6 不同生育期水稻茎、叶、穗占植株地上部总干物质重的比例
Fig.6 Proportion of stem, leaf and panicle in total dry matter weight of aboveground part of rice at different growth stages
处理 Treatment | 有效穗数 Effective spike(106hm-2) | 结实率 Seed setting rate/% | 千粒重 1 000-grain weight/g | 穗粒数/粒 Grain number per spike | 产量 Yield/(kg·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 1.41±0.07 e | 91.17±3.76 a | 27.38±1.02 b | 128.21±6.09 ab | 4 660±159 b |
NPK | 2.54±0.46 bc | 92.16±3.41 a | 29.3±0.37 a | 126.56±13.79 ab | 9 168±280 a |
1/4M+3/4NP | 2.90±0.10 ab | 91.02±7.64 a | 28.89±0.38 a | 130.71±11.09 ab | 9 355±2 091 a |
1/2M+1/2NP | 2.37±0.18 cd | 95.60±0.81 a | 28.48±1.39 ab | 122.33±10.15 b | 8 846±1 755 a |
M | 2.12±0.08 d | 94.25±2.04 a | 28.93±0.22 a | 144.88±11.4 ab | 8 656±320 a |
MNPK | 3.01±0.18 a | 89.30±2.41 a | 28.32±0.25 ab | 147.08±2.93 a | 10 307±1 299 a |
表4 水稻产量构成因子差异性分析
Table 4 Difference analysis of rice yield components
处理 Treatment | 有效穗数 Effective spike(106hm-2) | 结实率 Seed setting rate/% | 千粒重 1 000-grain weight/g | 穗粒数/粒 Grain number per spike | 产量 Yield/(kg·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 1.41±0.07 e | 91.17±3.76 a | 27.38±1.02 b | 128.21±6.09 ab | 4 660±159 b |
NPK | 2.54±0.46 bc | 92.16±3.41 a | 29.3±0.37 a | 126.56±13.79 ab | 9 168±280 a |
1/4M+3/4NP | 2.90±0.10 ab | 91.02±7.64 a | 28.89±0.38 a | 130.71±11.09 ab | 9 355±2 091 a |
1/2M+1/2NP | 2.37±0.18 cd | 95.60±0.81 a | 28.48±1.39 ab | 122.33±10.15 b | 8 846±1 755 a |
M | 2.12±0.08 d | 94.25±2.04 a | 28.93±0.22 a | 144.88±11.4 ab | 8 656±320 a |
MNPK | 3.01±0.18 a | 89.30±2.41 a | 28.32±0.25 ab | 147.08±2.93 a | 10 307±1 299 a |
指标 Index | 有效穗数 Effective spike | 结实率 Seed setting rate | 千粒重 1 000-grain weight | 穗粒数 Grain number per spike | 茎蘖数 Tiller number | 干物质积累 Dry matter accumulation | SPAD | 叶面积指数 Leaf area index |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
结实率Seed setting rate | -0.278 | |||||||
千粒重1 000-grain weight | 0.608 | 0.240 | ||||||
穗粒数Grain number per spike | 0.289 | -0.435 | 0.081 | |||||
茎蘖数Tiller number | 0.980** | -0.221 | 0.563 | 0.386 | ||||
干物质积累 | 0.939** | -0.117 | 0.624 | 0.483 | 0.979** | |||
Dry matter accumulation | ||||||||
SPAD | 0.933** | -0.292 | 0.478 | 0.507 | 0.980** | 0.963** | ||
叶面积指数Leaf area index | 0.918** | -0.442 | 0.319 | 0.535 | 0.950** | 0.915* | 0.968** | |
产量Yield | 0.937** | -0.030 | 0.744 | 0.366 | 0.962** | 0.979** | 0.932** | 0.844* |
表5 水稻产量构成因子及农艺性状相关性分析
Table 5 Correlation analysis of rice yield components and agronomic traits
指标 Index | 有效穗数 Effective spike | 结实率 Seed setting rate | 千粒重 1 000-grain weight | 穗粒数 Grain number per spike | 茎蘖数 Tiller number | 干物质积累 Dry matter accumulation | SPAD | 叶面积指数 Leaf area index |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
结实率Seed setting rate | -0.278 | |||||||
千粒重1 000-grain weight | 0.608 | 0.240 | ||||||
穗粒数Grain number per spike | 0.289 | -0.435 | 0.081 | |||||
茎蘖数Tiller number | 0.980** | -0.221 | 0.563 | 0.386 | ||||
干物质积累 | 0.939** | -0.117 | 0.624 | 0.483 | 0.979** | |||
Dry matter accumulation | ||||||||
SPAD | 0.933** | -0.292 | 0.478 | 0.507 | 0.980** | 0.963** | ||
叶面积指数Leaf area index | 0.918** | -0.442 | 0.319 | 0.535 | 0.950** | 0.915* | 0.968** | |
产量Yield | 0.937** | -0.030 | 0.744 | 0.366 | 0.962** | 0.979** | 0.932** | 0.844* |
[1] |
陈晨, 龚海青, 金梦灿, 等. 不同供氮形态下水稻苗期磷吸收累积与根系形态的关系[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2019, 33(2): 167-175.
DOI |
CHEN C, GONG H Q, JIN M C, et al. Correlation between root morphology and accumulation of phosphorus in rice seedlings under different N forms[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2019, 33(2): 167-175. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI |
|
[2] | 黄晶, 高菊生, 张杨珠, 等. 长期不同施肥下水稻产量及土壤有机质和氮素养分的变化特征[J]. 应用生态学报, 2013, 24(7): 1889-1894. |
HUANG J, GAO J S, ZHANG Y Z, et al. Change characteristics of rice yield and soil organic matter and nitrogen contents under various long-term fertilization regimes[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2013, 24(7): 1889-1894. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[3] | 黄欠如, 胡锋, 李辉信, 等. 红壤性水稻土施肥的产量效应及与气候、地力的关系[J]. 土壤学报, 2006, 43(6): 926-933. |
HUANG Q R, HU F, LI H X, et al. Crop yield response to fertilization and its relations with climate and soil fertility in red paddy soil[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2006, 43(6): 926-933. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[4] | 中国农业科学院土壤肥料研究所. 中国肥料[M]. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 1994. |
[5] | 方华舟, 项智锋. 水稻秸秆堆沤肥对优质水稻产量及质量的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2019(1): 62-70. |
FANG H Z, XIANG Z F. Influence of rice straw wet compost on yield and quality of high quality rice[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2019(1): 62-70. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[6] | 李忠芳, 徐明岗, 张会民, 等. 长期施肥和不同生态条件下我国作物产量可持续性特征[J]. 应用生态学报, 2010, 21(5): 1264-1269. |
LI Z F, XU M G, ZHANG H M, et al. Sustainability of crop yields in China under long-term fertilization and different ecological conditions[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2010, 21(5): 1264-1269. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[7] |
HAN X M, HU C, CHEN Y F, et al. Crop yield stability and sustainability in a rice-wheat cropping system based on 34-year field experiment[J]. European Journal of Agronomy, 2020, 113: 125965.
DOI URL |
[8] | 刘可星, 廖宗文, 游植麟. 有机无机肥混施对水稻土CH4排放的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 1997, 8(5): 491-494. |
LIU K X, LIAO Z W, YOU Z L. Effect of combined application of organic and inorganic fertilizers on CH4emission from paddy soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 1997, 8(5): 491-494. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[9] |
CAO X C, WU L L, LU R H, et al. Irrigation and fertilization management to optimize rice yield, water productivity and nitrogen recovery efficiency[J]. Irrigation Science, 2021, 39(2): 235-249.
DOI URL |
[10] |
REGANOLD J P. Soil quality and profitability of biodynamic and conventional farming systems: a review[J]. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture, 1995, 10(1): 36-45.
DOI URL |
[11] | CONACHER J, CONACHER A. Organic farming and the environment, with particular reference to Australia: a review[J]. Biological Agriculture & Horticulture, 1998, 16(2): 145-171. |
[12] | 杨旸, 崔超, 马广全, 等. 有机肥氮替代化肥氮对河套灌区春玉米生长发育、氮素效率及产量的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2020, 49(2): 9-16. |
YANG Y, CUI C, MA G Q, et al. Effect of nitrogen of organic manure replacing chemical nitrogenous fertilizer on growth, nitrogen use efficiency and yield of maize in Hetao irrigation area[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 49(2): 9-16. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[13] | 张向前, 曹承富, 张存岭, 等. 小麦光合特性及产量构成对长期不同土壤培肥模式的响应[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2018, 38(5): 615-622. |
ZHANG X Q, CAO C F, ZHANG C L, et al. Response of photosynthetic characteristics and yield components of winter wheat to different long-term soil fertilizer application model[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2018, 38(5): 615-622. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[14] | 田艳洪, 闫凤超, 高莹, 等. 施用有机肥对水稻生长及产量的影响[J]. 现代化农业, 2019(7): 17-19. |
TIAN Y H, YAN F C, GAO Y, et al. Effects of organic fertilizer on rice growth and yield[J]. Modern Agriculture, 2019(7): 17-19. (in Chinese) | |
[15] | 唐海明, 程爱武, 徐一兰, 等. 长期有机无机肥配施对双季稻区水稻干物质积累及产量的影响[J]. 农业现代化研究, 2015, 36(6): 1091-1098. |
TANG H M, CHENG A W, XU Y L, et al. Effects of long-term mixed application of organic and inorganic fertilizers on dry matter accumulation and yield of rice in double cropping rice fields[J]. Research of Agricultural Modernization, 2015, 36(6): 1091-1098. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[16] | 杨长明, 杨林章, 颜廷梅, 等. 不同肥料结构对水稻群体干物质生产及养分吸收分配的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2004, 35(2): 199-202. |
YANG C M, YANG L Z, YAN T M, et al. Effects of nutrient regimes on dry matter production and nutrient uptake and distribution by rice plant[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2004, 35(2): 199-202. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[17] | 任科宇, 徐明岗, 张露, 等. 我国不同区域粮食作物产量对有机肥施用的响应差异[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2021, 38(1): 143-150. |
REN K Y, XU M G, ZHANG L, et al. Response of grain crop yield to manure application in different regions of China[J]. Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environment, 2021, 38(1): 143-150. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[18] | 代小兵, 李青山, 张国斌. 有机肥部分替代化肥对水稻产量及农艺性状的影响[J]. 湖北植保, 2020(2): 37-38. |
DAI X B, LI Q S, ZHANG G B. Effect of partial replacement of fertilizer with organic fertilizer on rice yield and agronomic traits[J]. Hubei Plant Protection, 2020(2): 37-38. (in Chinese) | |
[19] | 王站付, 石磊, 杨业凤, 等. 无机有机肥配施对水稻产量及氮肥利用率的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2020, 48(1): 163-166. |
WANG Z F, SHI L, YANG Y F, et al. Influence of organic-inorganic compound fertilizers on yield and nitrogen use efficiency in rice[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 48(1): 163-166. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[20] | 李思平, 丁效东, 曾路生, 等. 秸秆还田与化肥减施对水稻生长指标及光合参数的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020, 34(2): 208-215. |
LI S P, DING X D, ZENG L S, et al. Effects of straw returning and chemical fertilizer reduction on growth index and photosynthetic parameters of rice[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 34(2): 208-215. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[21] | 吴嘉彧, 怀宝东, 万广超, 等. 优化施肥技术对寒区水稻生长发育和产量性状的影响[J]. 现代化农业, 2019(6): 17-18. |
WU J Y, HUAI B D, WAN G C, et al. Effects of optimized fertilization technology on growth and yield characters of rice in cold region[J]. Modern Agriculture, 2019(6): 17-18. (in Chinese) | |
[22] | 董桂军, 怀宝东, 闫凤超. 有机肥对寒区水稻生长发育和产量性状的影响[J]. 现代化农业, 2019(7): 29-31. |
DONG G J, HUAI B D, YAN F C. Effects of organic fertilizer on growth and yield characters of rice in cold region[J]. Modernizing Agriculture, 2019(7): 29-31. (in Chinese) | |
[23] | 徐一兰, 唐海明, 程爱武, 等. 不同施肥模式对大麦-双季稻三熟种植模式中大麦干物质积累、分配及产量的影响[J]. 东北农业大学学报, 2015, 46(2): 64-71,99. |
XU Y L, TANG H M, CHENG A W, et al. Effect of different long-term fertilizer managements on dry matter accumulation, distribution and yield of barley under barley and double cropping rice triple crops planting patterns[J]. Journal of Northeast Agricultural University, 2015, 46(2): 64-71,99. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[24] | 刘彦伶, 李渝, 白怡婧, 等. 长期不同施肥对水稻干物质和磷素积累与转运的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2019, 25(7): 1146-1156. |
LIU Y L, LI Y, BAI Y J, et al. Effect of long-term fertilization patterns on dry matter and phosphorus accumulation and translocation in rice[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2019, 25(7): 1146-1156. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[25] |
苏卫, 冯跃华, 许桂玲, 等. 秸秆还田与施氮量对喀斯特地区杂交籼稻干物质积累和产量的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2019, 33(9): 1856-1864.
DOI |
SU W, FENG Y H, XU G L, et al. Effects of straw returning and nitrogen application rate on dry matter accumulation and yield of indica hybrid rice in Karst region[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 33(9): 1856-1864. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[26] | 李娟, 黄平娜, 刘淑军, 等. 不同施肥模式对水稻生理特性、产量及其N肥农学利用率的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2011, 25(1): 169-173,195. |
LI J, HUANG P N, LIU S J, et al. Effects of different fertilization models on physiological characteristics, yield and agronomic nitrogen use efficiency in rice (Oryza sattva l.)[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2011, 25(1): 169-173,195. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[27] | 张玉平, 刘强, 荣湘民, 等. 有机无机肥配施对水稻光合特性及NR与SPS活性的影响[J]. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 37(5): 540-545. |
ZHANG Y P, LIU Q, RONG X M, et al. Effects of organic manure and inorganic fertilizer combination on photosynthesis characteristics and enzyme activities of NR and SPS in rice functional leaves[J]. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University (Natural Sciences), 2011, 37(5): 540-545. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[28] | 唐海明, 肖小平, 李超, 等. 长期施肥模式对双季水稻生理特性与产量的影响[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2018, 23(11): 60-71. |
TANG H M, XIAO X P, LI C, et al. Effects of different long-term fertilization managements on the physiological characteristics of leaves and yield of rice in double cropping paddy field[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2018, 23(11): 60-71. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[29] | PATRA A K, MISHRA K N, GARNAYAK L M, et al. Influence of long-term organic nutrient management on soil quality and crop productivity in rice (Oryza sativa)-potato (Solanum tuberosum)-okra (Abelmoschusesculentus) cropping system under irrigated condition[J]. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 2017, 62(3):268-274. |
[30] | 加孜拉, 白云岗. 不同土壤肥力条件下水肥运筹对滴灌冬小麦生长发育与产量品质的影响[J]. 节水灌溉, 2016(9): 30-35. |
JIA Z L, BAI Y G. Effect of different soil fertility under the condition of water and fertilizer regulation of growth and development and yield and quality of winter wheat under drip irrigation[J]. Water Saving Irrigation, 2016(9): 30-35. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[31] | 侯红乾, 冀建华, 刘秀梅, 等. 不同比例有机肥替代化肥对水稻产量和氮素利用率的影响[J]. 土壤, 2020, 52(4): 758-765. |
HOU H Q, JI J H, LIU X M, et al. Effect of long-term combined application of organic and inorganic fertilizers on rice yield, nitrogen uptake and utilization in red soil area of China[J]. Soils, 2020, 52(4): 758-765. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[32] |
金磊, 李霞, 魏晓东, 等. 不同氮效率粳稻生育后期产量形成的生理基础[J]. 华北农学报, 2013, 28(5): 175-186.
DOI |
JIN L, LI X, WEI X D, et al. Physiological basis on the yield in Japonica rice with different N application efficiency during the later development stage[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2013, 28(5): 175-186. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI |
|
[33] | 陈丽楠, 彭显龙, 刘元英, 等. 养分管理对寒地水稻干物质积累及运转的影响[J]. 东北农业大学学报, 2010, 41(5): 52-56. |
CHEN L N, PENG X L, LIU Y Y, et al. Effect of nutrient management on dry matter accumulation and translocation of rice in cold area[J]. Journal of Northeast Agricultural University, 2010, 41(5): 52-56. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[34] | 李杰, 张洪程, 常勇, 等. 不同种植方式水稻高产栽培条件下的光合物质生产特征研究[J]. 作物学报, 2011, 37(7): 1235-1248. |
LI J, ZHANG H C, CHANG Y, et al. Characteristics of photosynthesis and matter production of rice with different planting methods under high-yielding cultivation condition[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2011, 37(7): 1235-1248. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[35] | 霍中洋, 姚义, 张洪程, 等. 播期对直播稻光合物质生产特征的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(13): 2592-2606. |
HUO Z Y, YAO Y, ZHANG H C, et al. Effect of sowing date on characteristics of photosynthesis and matter production of direct seeding rice[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(13): 2592-2606. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[36] | 刘军, 余铁桥. 大穗型水稻超高产产量形成特点及物质生产分析[J]. 湖南农业大学学报, 1998, 24(1): 3-5. |
LIU J, YU T Q. Analysis of the formation of super-high yield of big panicle rice and its dry matter production[J]. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University, 1998, 24(1): 3-5. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[37] | 彭耀林, 朱俊英, 唐建军, 等. 有机无机肥长期配施对水稻产量及干物质生产特性的影响[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2004, 26(4): 485-490. |
PENG Y L, ZHU J Y, TANG J J, et al. Effects of long-term mixed application of organic-inorganic fertilizers on the yield and dry matter produing characters of rice[J]. Acta Agriculturae Universitis Jiangxiensis, 2004, 26(4): 485-490. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[38] | 赵广才, 常旭虹, 杨玉双, 等. 冬小麦高产高效应变栽培技术研究[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2009, 29(4): 690-695. |
ZHAO G C, CHANG X H, YANG Y S, et al. Study on high-yield, high-efficiency and adapting cultivating technology in winter wheat[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2009, 29(4): 690-695. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[39] | 张进帅, 黄翠红, 王慧, 等. 水稻单株产量相关性状的相关性及其通径分析[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2019, 47(18): 108-113. |
ZHANG J S, HUANG C H, WANG H, et al. Correlation and path analysis of single plant yield-related traits of rice[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 47(18): 108-113. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[40] | 刘守龙, 童成立, 吴金水, 等. 等氮条件下有机无机肥配比对水稻产量的影响探讨[J]. 土壤学报, 2007, 44(1): 106-112. |
LIU S L, TONG C L, WU J S, et al. Effect of ratio of organic manure/chemical fertilizer in fertilization on rice yield under the same n condition[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2007, 44(1): 106-112. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[41] | 魏文良, 刘路, 仇恒浩. 有机无机肥配施对我国主要粮食作物产量和氮肥利用效率的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26(8): 1384-1394. |
WEI W L, LIU L, QIU H H. Effects of different organic resources application combined with chemical fertilizer on yield and nitrogen use efficiency of main grain crops in China[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2020, 26(8): 1384-1394. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[42] | 张晶, 张定一, 王丽, 等. 不同有机肥和氮磷组合对旱地小麦的增产机理研究[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23(1): 238-243. |
ZHANG J, ZHANG D Y, WANG L, et al. The mechanism of different combinations of organic and N, P fertilizers increasing yield of dryland wheat[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2017, 23(1): 238-243. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[43] | 胡建利, 王德建, 王灿, 等. 不同施肥方式对水稻产量构成及其稳定性的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2009, 17(1): 48-53. |
HU J L, WANG D J, WANG C, et al. Effect of different fertilization systems on rice yield components and their stability[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2009, 17(1): 48-53. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
|
[44] | 刘红江, 陈虞雯, 孙国峰, 等. 有机肥-无机肥不同配施比例对水稻产量和农田养分流失的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2017, 36(2): 405-412. |
LIU H J, CHEN Y W, SUN G F, et al. Effects of different organic-inorganic fertilizer combination ratios on rice yield and nutrient loss with surface runoff[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2017, 36(2): 405-412. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[45] | 杨建昌, 杜永, 刘辉. 长江下游稻麦周年超高产栽培途径与技术[J]. 中国农业科学, 2008, 41(6): 1611-1621. |
YANG J C, DU Y, LIU H. Cultivation approaches and techniques for annual super-high-yielding of rice and wheat in the lower reaches of Yangtze River[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2008, 41(6): 1611-1621. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[46] | 邓中华, 明日, 李小坤, 等. 不同密度和氮肥用量对水稻产量、构成因子及氮肥利用率的影响[J]. 土壤, 2015, 47(1): 20-25. |
DENG Z H, MING R, LI X K, et al. Effects of nitrogen application rate and planting density on grain yields, yield components and nitrogen use efficiencies of rice[J]. Soils, 2015, 47(1): 20-25. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[47] | 朱宽宇, 展明飞, 陈静, 等. 不同氮肥水平下结实期灌溉方式对水稻弱势粒灌浆及产量的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2018, 32(2): 155-168. |
ZHU K Y, ZHAN M F, CHEN J, et al. Effects of irrigation regimes during grain filling under different nitrogen rates on inferior spikelets grain-filling and grain yield of rice[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2018, 32(2): 155-168. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI |
[1] | 柴冠群, 周玮, 梁红, 范菲菲, 朱大雁, 范成五. 叶面喷施锌肥和柠檬酸对辣椒产量、品质与Cd吸收转运的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(5): 1069-1079. |
[2] | 黄正, 张荣萍, 马鹏, 张琪, 周宁宁, 阿什日轨, 冯婷煜, 周林. 冬水田油菜秸秆还田和氮肥运筹对杂交稻干物质积累和产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(5): 983-991. |
[3] | 檀舒霞, 赵桃弟, 杨豪, 宁可君, 刘丽, 何庆元, 黄守程, 舒英杰. 遮阴对10个菜用大豆品种农艺性状、产量和硝态氮代谢的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(4): 729-735. |
[4] | 马义虎, 曾孝元, 何贤彪, 周奶弟, 陈剑. 浙东南地区优质稻产量与品质对不同播期气候因子的响应[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(4): 736-751. |
[5] | 马新超, 轩正英, 谭占明, 周宇, 王旭峰. 温室沙培黄瓜生产效应的水氮耦合方案优化[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(4): 809-820. |
[6] | 王金凤, 周琦, 吕玉龙, 陈卓梅. 间作景观树种对茶园生态系统与茶叶生产的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(3): 523-533. |
[7] | 王犇, 李宇星, 李哲, 姜沣溢, 黄正来, 樊永惠, 张文静, 马尚宇. 海藻糖处理对花后高温胁迫弱筋小麦生选6号产量形成及品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(1): 1-9. |
[8] | 李永晖, 李捷, 冯丽丹, 何静, 张煦, 刘祥林. 不同植物免疫诱抗剂对枸杞鲜果产量、抗病性和贮藏能力的差异比较[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(1): 164-174. |
[9] | 孟繁昊, 杨恒山, 张瑞富, 张玉芹, 李维敏, 张雨珊, 张明伟. 灌溉方式对西辽河平原玉米产量和水氮利用效率的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(9): 1826-1836. |
[10] | 李旺雄, 张洋, 唐中祺, 郁继华. 平衡施肥对设施基质栽培番茄生长、品质、矿质元素含量与产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(8): 1648-1660. |
[11] | 邹振浩, 孙业良, 赵玉宝, 李鑫, 张丽平, 张兰, 董春旺, 付建玉, 韩文炎, 颜鹏. 采摘花芽对春茶产量与品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(7): 1369-1376. |
[12] | 朱诗君, 金树权, 姚红燕, 徐志豪, 罗幼君, 陈若霞. 不同基肥及追肥配比对凤梨生长、产量和品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(6): 1217-1226. |
[13] | 朱铭, 刘琛, 林义成, 郭彬, 李华, 傅庆林. 不同调理剂组合对浙江红壤土壤肥力、微生物群落多样性和水稻产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(6): 1258-1267. |
[14] | 叶迎, 赵考诚, 马军, 祝轲, 庄恒扬. 播期和施氮量组合对水稻南粳9108产量和氮素利用的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(5): 879-886. |
[15] | 胡开博, 杨清夏, 李扬, 吴开贤, 赵平, 龙光强. 化肥减氮配施氨基酸肥料对春玉米生产的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(4): 661-670. |
阅读次数 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
全文 2341
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
摘要 579
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||