浙江农业学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (5): 983-991.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2023.05.02
黄正(), 张荣萍(
), 马鹏, 张琪, 周宁宁, 阿什日轨, 冯婷煜, 周林
收稿日期:
2022-04-18
出版日期:
2023-05-25
发布日期:
2023-06-01
作者简介:
黄正(1997—),男,四川巴中人,硕士研究生,主要从事水稻高产高效栽培研究。E-mail:1336865778@qq.com
通讯作者:
*张荣萍,E-mail:zhzhrrpp@163.com
基金资助:
HUANG Zheng(), ZHANG Rongping(
), MA Peng, ZHANG Qi, ZHOU Ningning, ASHEN Rigui, FENG Tingyu, ZHOU Lin
Received:
2022-04-18
Online:
2023-05-25
Published:
2023-06-01
摘要:
为探讨川南冬水田油菜秸秆还田下水稻适宜的氮肥运筹方式,开展2因素随机区组试验,研究油菜秸秆还田与氮肥运筹对杂交稻分蘖动态、干物质积累和产量的影响。试验共设置2种秸秆还田方式——秸秆不还田(T1)和秸秆全量还田(T2),4个氮肥处理——不施氮肥的空白对照(N1),以及总施氮量均为150 kg·hm-2,但其在基肥、分蘖肥、穗肥中的比例分别为5∶3∶2、3∶3∶4、3∶2∶5的N2、N3、N4处理。结果表明:相同的秸秆还田处理下,各施氮处理(N2、N3、N4)对杂交稻最高时期的分蘖数无显著影响。在秸秆不还田的条件下,N3处理可有效提高杂交稻的分蘖成穗率、最高分蘖期到成熟期的干物质积累量、产量。在秸秆还田条件下,成熟期时N2与N3处理的干物质积累量与产量最高,但二者差异不显著。综合分析,冬水田经油菜季栽培种植后,油菜秸秆全量还田配合基肥、分蘖肥、穗肥施用比例5∶3∶2的氮肥运筹,可实现试验条件下的最高产,产量为10.12 t·hm-2。
中图分类号:
黄正, 张荣萍, 马鹏, 张琪, 周宁宁, 阿什日轨, 冯婷煜, 周林. 冬水田油菜秸秆还田和氮肥运筹对杂交稻干物质积累和产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(5): 983-991.
HUANG Zheng, ZHANG Rongping, MA Peng, ZHANG Qi, ZHOU Ningning, ASHEN Rigui, FENG Tingyu, ZHOU Lin. Effects of rape straw returning in winter paddy field and nitrogen fertilizer management on dry matter accumulation and yield of hybrid rice[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(5): 983-991.
秸秆还田方式 Straw returning method | 氮肥处理 Nitrogen treatment | 不同移栽天数的水稻分蘖数Tiller number after different time of transplanting | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
7 d | 14 d | 21 d | 28 d | 35 d | 42 d | ||
T1 | N1 | 30.92 b | 61.11 b | 131.67 c | 242.41 b | 292.96 b | 275.62 b |
N2 | 46.48 a | 92.41 a | 182.59 b | 298.33 a | 366.85 a | 346.85 a | |
N3 | 43.52 a | 95.19 a | 193.70 a | 302.22 a | 363.70 a | 348.52 a | |
N4 | 44.63 a | 90.56 a | 180.00 b | 292.78 a | 360.74 a | 342.65 a | |
T2 | N1 | 35.00 b | 75.93 b | 149.63 b | 269.63 b | 296.48 b | 291.23 d |
N2 | 45.00 a | 100.74 a | 211.30 a | 325.93 a | 352.59 a | 345.19 a | |
N3 | 41.48 ab | 100.37 a | 207.22 a | 325.19 a | 359.63 a | 339.38 b | |
N4 | 42.78 ab | 96.48 a | 197.22 a | 317.59 a | 359.67 a | 332.59 c |
表1 不同处理对水稻分蘖数的影响
Table 1 Effect of different treatments on tiller number of rice 104 hm-2
秸秆还田方式 Straw returning method | 氮肥处理 Nitrogen treatment | 不同移栽天数的水稻分蘖数Tiller number after different time of transplanting | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
7 d | 14 d | 21 d | 28 d | 35 d | 42 d | ||
T1 | N1 | 30.92 b | 61.11 b | 131.67 c | 242.41 b | 292.96 b | 275.62 b |
N2 | 46.48 a | 92.41 a | 182.59 b | 298.33 a | 366.85 a | 346.85 a | |
N3 | 43.52 a | 95.19 a | 193.70 a | 302.22 a | 363.70 a | 348.52 a | |
N4 | 44.63 a | 90.56 a | 180.00 b | 292.78 a | 360.74 a | 342.65 a | |
T2 | N1 | 35.00 b | 75.93 b | 149.63 b | 269.63 b | 296.48 b | 291.23 d |
N2 | 45.00 a | 100.74 a | 211.30 a | 325.93 a | 352.59 a | 345.19 a | |
N3 | 41.48 ab | 100.37 a | 207.22 a | 325.19 a | 359.63 a | 339.38 b | |
N4 | 42.78 ab | 96.48 a | 197.22 a | 317.59 a | 359.67 a | 332.59 c |
秸秆还田方式 Straw returning method | 氮肥处理 Nitrogen treatment | 移栽后不同时间的水稻相对分蘖速率Relative tillering rate during different time of transplanting | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
7~14 d | 14~21 d | 21~28 d | 28~35 d | 35~42 d | ||
T1 | N1 | 0.098 b | 0.111 a | 0.087 b | 0.027 a | -0.009 d |
N2 | 0.099 b | 0.098 a | 0.070 a | 0.030 a | -0.008 c | |
N3 | 0.110 a | 0.102 a | 0.064 a | 0.027 a | -0.006 a | |
N4 | 0.100 ab | 0.098 a | 0.069 a | 0.030 a | -0.007 b | |
T2 | N1 | 0.111 a | 0.097 a | 0.084 a | 0.013 a | -0.002 a |
N2 | 0.115 a | 0.106 a | 0.062 b | 0.011 a | -0.003 b | |
N3 | 0.126 a | 0.104 a | 0.064 b | 0.014 a | -0.008 c | |
N4 | 0.117 a | 0.102 a | 0.068 ab | 0.018 a | -0.011 d |
表2 不同处理对水稻相对分蘖速率的影响
Table 2 Effects of different treatments on relative tillering rate of rice d-1
秸秆还田方式 Straw returning method | 氮肥处理 Nitrogen treatment | 移栽后不同时间的水稻相对分蘖速率Relative tillering rate during different time of transplanting | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
7~14 d | 14~21 d | 21~28 d | 28~35 d | 35~42 d | ||
T1 | N1 | 0.098 b | 0.111 a | 0.087 b | 0.027 a | -0.009 d |
N2 | 0.099 b | 0.098 a | 0.070 a | 0.030 a | -0.008 c | |
N3 | 0.110 a | 0.102 a | 0.064 a | 0.027 a | -0.006 a | |
N4 | 0.100 ab | 0.098 a | 0.069 a | 0.030 a | -0.007 b | |
T2 | N1 | 0.111 a | 0.097 a | 0.084 a | 0.013 a | -0.002 a |
N2 | 0.115 a | 0.106 a | 0.062 b | 0.011 a | -0.003 b | |
N3 | 0.126 a | 0.104 a | 0.064 b | 0.014 a | -0.008 c | |
N4 | 0.117 a | 0.102 a | 0.068 ab | 0.018 a | -0.011 d |
图1 不同处理对水稻成穗率的影响 柱上无相同字母的表示处理间差异显著(P<0.05)。下同。
Fig.1 Effects of different treatments on spike rate of rice Bars marked without the same letters indicate significant difference at P<0.05. The same as below.
秸秆还田 方式 Straw returning method | 氮肥处理 Nitrogen treatment | 各生育期的地上部干物质量 Dry weight of aboveground part under different growth periood | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
最高分蘖期 Highest tillering | 齐穗期 Full heading | 成熟期 Maturity | ||
T1 | N1 | 2.56 c | 11.35 c | 16.36 d |
N2 | 3.62 a | 13.89 ab | 20.24 b | |
N3 | 3.35 b | 14.26 a | 21.06 a | |
N4 | 3.49 ab | 13.64 b | 19.00 c | |
T2 | N1 | 2.62 c | 11.14 c | 17.03 c |
N2 | 3.95 a | 15.77 a | 22.05 a | |
N3 | 3.72 b | 15.10 b | 21.91 a | |
N4 | 3.85 ab | 14.69 b | 20.65 b |
表3 不同处理对水稻主要生育时期地上部干物质量的影响
Table 3 Effects of different treatments on dry weight of aboveground part of rice under different growth periods t·hm-2
秸秆还田 方式 Straw returning method | 氮肥处理 Nitrogen treatment | 各生育期的地上部干物质量 Dry weight of aboveground part under different growth periood | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
最高分蘖期 Highest tillering | 齐穗期 Full heading | 成熟期 Maturity | ||
T1 | N1 | 2.56 c | 11.35 c | 16.36 d |
N2 | 3.62 a | 13.89 ab | 20.24 b | |
N3 | 3.35 b | 14.26 a | 21.06 a | |
N4 | 3.49 ab | 13.64 b | 19.00 c | |
T2 | N1 | 2.62 c | 11.14 c | 17.03 c |
N2 | 3.95 a | 15.77 a | 22.05 a | |
N3 | 3.72 b | 15.10 b | 21.91 a | |
N4 | 3.85 ab | 14.69 b | 20.65 b |
秸秆还田方式 Straw returning method | 氮肥处理 Nitrogen treatment | 有效穗数 Effective panicle number/(104 hm-2) | 每穗着粒数 Number of spikelets per panicle | 结实率 Seed setting rate/% | 千粒重 1 000-grain weight/g | 产量 Yield/(t·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | N1 | 213.33 d | 139.9 c | 78.62 b | 34.37 a | 8.06 d |
N2 | 227.86 b | 145.9 ab | 81.05 a | 34.53 a | 9.30 b | |
N3 | 230.92 a | 147.19 a | 81.50 a | 34.84 a | 9.65 a | |
N4 | 223.60 c | 142.02 bc | 79.71 ab | 34.41 a | 8.71 c | |
T2 | N1 | 218.56 c | 142.71 c | 79.21 b | 34.41 a | 8.50 c |
N2 | 232.45 a | 150.15 a | 83.40 a | 34.78 a | 10.12 a | |
N3 | 232.24 a | 148.24 ab | 83.51 a | 35.01 a | 10.07 a | |
N4 | 226.65 b | 145.14 bc | 82.25 a | 34.67 a | 9.38 b |
表4 不同处理对水稻产量及其组成的影响
Table 4 Effects of differenrt treamtments on rice yield and its componetnts
秸秆还田方式 Straw returning method | 氮肥处理 Nitrogen treatment | 有效穗数 Effective panicle number/(104 hm-2) | 每穗着粒数 Number of spikelets per panicle | 结实率 Seed setting rate/% | 千粒重 1 000-grain weight/g | 产量 Yield/(t·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | N1 | 213.33 d | 139.9 c | 78.62 b | 34.37 a | 8.06 d |
N2 | 227.86 b | 145.9 ab | 81.05 a | 34.53 a | 9.30 b | |
N3 | 230.92 a | 147.19 a | 81.50 a | 34.84 a | 9.65 a | |
N4 | 223.60 c | 142.02 bc | 79.71 ab | 34.41 a | 8.71 c | |
T2 | N1 | 218.56 c | 142.71 c | 79.21 b | 34.41 a | 8.50 c |
N2 | 232.45 a | 150.15 a | 83.40 a | 34.78 a | 10.12 a | |
N3 | 232.24 a | 148.24 ab | 83.51 a | 35.01 a | 10.07 a | |
N4 | 226.65 b | 145.14 bc | 82.25 a | 34.67 a | 9.38 b |
[1] | 刘代银, 朱旭霞. 四川冬水田管理和利用中存在的问题及对策[J]. 四川农业科技, 2007(12): 5-6. |
LIU D Y, ZHU X X. Problems and countermeasures in the management and utilization of winter paddy fields in Sichuan[J]. Science and Technology of Sichuan Agriculture, 2007(12): 5-6. (in Chinese) | |
[2] | 孙志高, 刘景双, 陈小兵. 三江平原典型小叶章湿地土壤中硝态氮和铵态氮的空间分布格局[J]. 水土保持通报, 2009, 29(3): 66-72. |
SUN Z G, LIU J S, CHEN X B. Spatial distribution patterns of nitrate nitrogen and ammonia nitrogen in typical Calamagrostis angustifolia wetland soils of Sanjiang Plain[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2009, 29(3): 66-72. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[3] | 黄杰. 水旱轮作体系下水-旱转换过程中土壤养分变化规律研究[D]. 雅安: 四川农业大学, 2015. |
HUANG J. The law of nutrient change in soil with water-drought conversion process in paddy-upland rotation[D]. Ya’an: Sichuan Agricultural University, 2015. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[4] | 曾勇军, 吕伟生, 石庆华, 等. 水稻机收减损技术研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2014(6): 131-134. |
ZENG Y J, LYU W S, SHI Q H, et al. Study on mechanical harvesting technique for loss reducing of rice[J]. Crops, 2014(6): 131-134. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[5] | 胡乃娟, 张四伟, 杨敏芳, 等. 秸秆还田与耕作方式对稻麦轮作农田土壤碳库及结构的影响[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2013, 36(4): 7-12. |
HU N J, ZHANG S W, YANG M F, et al. Effects of different tillage and straw return on soil carbon pool and soil structure under rice-wheat rotation system[J]. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University, 2013, 36(4): 7-12. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[6] | 王红梅, 顾建芹, 相家英, 等. 稻麦轮作下连续秸秆还田对作物产量及土壤肥力的影响[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2022, 63(2): 250-255. |
WANG H M, GU J Q, XIANG J Y, et al. Effect of continuous straw returning on crop yield and soil fertility in rice-wheat rotation field[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 63(2): 250-255. (in Chinese) | |
[7] | 韩上, 武际, 李敏, 等. 深耕结合秸秆还田提高作物产量并改善耕层薄化土壤理化性质[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26(2): 276-284. |
HAN S, WU J, LI M, et al. Deep tillage with straw returning increase crop yield and improve soil physicochemical properties under topsoil thinning treatment[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2020, 26(2): 276-284. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[8] |
ZHENG Y, HAN X R, LI Y Y, et al. Effects of biochar and straw application on the physicochemical and biological properties of paddy soils in northeast China[J]. Scientific Reports, 2019, 9: 16531.
DOI PMID |
[9] | 倪国荣, 魏赛金, 吕伟生, 等. 稻草全量还田配施腐解菌剂对机插晚稻生长发育的影响[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2015, 37(6): 960-965. |
NI G R, WEI S J, LYU W S, et al. Effects of rice straw returning with straw decomposition agent on growth of machine-transplanted late rice[J]. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis, 2015, 37(6): 960-965. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[10] | 汪军, 王德建, 张刚. 秸秆还田下氮肥用量对稻田养分淋洗的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2010, 18(2): 316-321. |
WANG J, WANG D J, ZHANG G. Effect of incorporated straw-nitrogen fertilizer on nutrient leaching in paddy soils[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2010, 18(2): 316-321. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
|
[11] |
TVEIT A, SCHWACKE R, SVENNING M M, et al. Organic carbon transformations in high-Arctic peat soils: key functions and microorganisms[J]. The ISME Journal, 2013, 7(2): 299-311.
DOI |
[12] | 须湘成, 张继宏, 汪景宽, 等. 不同有机物料的腐解残留率及其对土壤腐殖质组成和光学性质的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 1993, 24(2): 53-56. |
XU X C, ZHANG J H, WANG J K, et al. The decay rate of different organic materials and their effects on soil humus composition and optical properties[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 1993, 24(2): 53-56. (in Chinese) | |
[13] | 李忠佩, 林心雄. 田间条件下红壤水稻土有机碳的矿化量研究[J]. 土壤, 2002, 34(6): 310-314. |
LI Z P, LIN X X. Study on the mineralization of organic carbon in red paddy soil under field conditions[J]. Soils, 2002, 34(6): 310-314. (in Chinese) | |
[14] | 李晓峰, 程金秋, 梁健, 等. 秸秆全量还田与氮肥运筹对机插粳稻产量及氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(6): 912-924. |
LI X F, CHENG J Q, LIANG J, et al. Effects of total straw returning and nitrogen application on grain yield and nitrogen absorption and utilization of machine transplanted japonica rice[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2017, 43(6): 912-924. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
|
[15] | 严奉君, 孙永健, 马均, 等. 秸秆覆盖与氮肥运筹对杂交稻根系生长及氮素利用的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2015, 21(1): 23-35. |
YAN F J, SUN Y J, MA J, et al. Effects of straw mulch and nitrogen management on root growth and nitrogen utilization characteristics of hybrid rice[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2015, 21(1): 23-35. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[16] | 郑浣彤, 邵玺文, 耿艳秋, 等. 秸秆还田与氮肥运筹对水稻产量及氮素利用的影响[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2019, 38(12): 29-36. |
ZHENG H T, SHAO X W, GENG Y Q, et al. Effects of sraw returning and nitrogen fertilizer application on rice yield and nitrogen utilization[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2019, 38(12): 29-36. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[17] | 田广丽, 周毅, 孙博, 等. 氮素及栽培密度影响水稻分蘖动态的机制[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2018, 24(4): 896-904. |
TIAN G L, ZHOU Y, SUN B, et al. Effects of nitrogen and transplanting density on the mechanisms of tillering dynamic of rice[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2018, 24(4): 896-904. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[18] | 钟旭华, 黄农荣, 郑海波, 等. 不同时期施氮对华南双季杂交稻产量及氮素吸收和氮肥利用率的影响[J]. 杂交水稻, 2007, 22(4): 62-66. |
ZHONG X H, HUANG N R, ZHENG H B, et al. Effect of nitrogen application timing on grain yield, nitrogen uptake and use efficiency of hybrid rice in South China[J]. Hybrid Rice, 2007, 22(4): 62-66. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[19] | 杨宇虹, 赵正雄, 李春俭, 等. 不同氮形态和氮水平对水田与旱地烤烟烟叶糖含量及相关酶活性的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2009, 15(6): 1386-1394. |
YANG Y H, ZHAO Z X, LI C J, et al. Effects of nitrogen fertilization on carbohydrate content and related metabolic enzymes of flue-cured tobacco in paddy field and highland[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2009, 15(6): 1386-1394. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[20] |
范立慧, 徐珊珊, 侯朋福, 等. 不同地力下基蘖肥运筹比例对水稻产量及氮肥吸收利用的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(10): 1872-1884.
DOI |
FAN L H, XU S S, HOU P F, et al. Effect of different ratios of basal to tiller nitrogen on rice yield and nitrogen utilization under different soil fertility[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(10): 1872-1884. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[21] | 范明生, 樊红柱, 吕世华, 等. 西南地区水旱轮作系统养分管理存在问题分析与管理策略建议[J]. 西南农业学报, 2008, 21(6): 1564-1568. |
FAN M S, FAN H Z, LYU S H, et al. The current status of nutrient management and strategy in paddy rice-upland crop rotation in southwest China[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2008, 21(6): 1564-1568. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[22] |
LAFARGE T A, HAMMER G L. Predicting plant leaf area production:shoot assimilate accumulation and partitioning and leaf area ratio, are stable for a wide range of sorghum population densities[J]. Field Crops Research, 2002, 77(2/3): 137-151.
DOI URL |
[23] | 彭志芸, 丁峰, 谌洁, 等. 麦油稻轮作秸秆还田与施氮对水稻光合特性及产量的影响[J]. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 46(3): 253-261. |
PENG Z Y, DING F, SHEN J, et al. Effects of straw mulching and nitrogen management on photosynthetic characteristics and yield of direct seeding rice under wheat rape rice rotation[J]. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University (Natural Sciences), 2020, 46(3): 253-261. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[24] | 李录久, 王家嘉, 吴萍萍, 等. 秸秆还田下氮肥运筹对白土田水稻产量和氮吸收利用的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2016, 22(1): 254-262. |
LI L J, WANG J J, WU P P, et al. Effect of different nitrogen application on rice yield and N uptake of white soil under wheat straw turnover[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2016, 22(1): 254-262. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[25] | 胡雅杰, 朱大伟, 邢志鹏, 等. 改进施氮运筹对水稻产量和氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2015, 21(1): 12-22. |
HU Y J, ZHU D W, XING Z P, et al. Modifying nitrogen fertilization ratio to increase the yield and nitrogen uptake of super japonica rice[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2015, 21(1): 12-22. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[26] | 孔丽丽, 侯云鹏, 尹彩侠, 等. 秸秆还田下寒地水稻实现高产高氮肥利用率的氮肥运筹模式[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2021, 27(7): 1282-1293. |
KONG L L, HOU Y P, YIN C X, et al. Nitrogen fertilizer management for high nitrogen utilization efficiency and rice yield under straw incorporation in a cold region[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2021, 27(7): 1282-1293. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[27] |
殷尧翥, 郭长春, 孙永健, 等. 稻油轮作下油菜秸秆还田与水氮管理对杂交稻群体质量和产量的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2019, 33(3): 257-268.
DOI |
YIN Y Z, GUO C C, SUN Y J, et al. Effects of rape straw retention and water and nitrogen management on population quality and yield of hybrid rice under rice-rape rotation[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2019, 33(3): 257-268. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI |
|
[28] | 钟旭华, 彭少兵, SHEEHY J E, 等. 水稻群体成穗率与干物质积累动态关系的模拟研究[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2001, 15(2): 107-112. |
ZHONG X H, PENG S B, SHEEHY J E, et al. Relationship between productive tiller percentage and biomass accumulation in rice (Oryza sativa L.): a simulation approach[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2001, 15(2): 107-112. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[29] | 刘占军, 艾超, 徐新朋, 等. 低产水稻土改良与管理研究策略[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2015, 21(2): 509-516. |
LIU Z J, AI C, XU X P, et al. Research strategy of reclamation and management for low-yield rice paddy soils[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2015, 21(2): 509-516. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[30] | 平亚琴. 填闲种植油菜对马铃薯田土壤特性及马铃薯产量的影响[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2017. |
PING Y Q. Effect of rape plantign as catch crop on soil characteristics and potato yield in potato field[D]. Yangling: Northwest A & F University, 2017. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[31] |
严奉君, 孙永健, 马均, 等. 不同土壤肥力条件下麦秆还田与氮肥运筹对杂交稻氮素利用、产量及米质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2015, 29(1): 56-64.
DOI |
YAN F J, SUN Y J, MA J, et al. Effects of wheat straw mulching and nitrogen management on grain yield, rice quality and nitrogen utilization in hybrid rice under different soil fertility conditions[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2015, 29(1): 56-64. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[32] | 高日平, 赵沛义, 韩云飞, 等. 秸秆还田与氮肥运筹对土壤水碳氮耦合及作物产量的影响[J]. 土壤, 2021, 53(5): 952-960. |
GAO R P, ZHAO P Y, HAN Y F, et al. Effects of straw returning and nitrogen application on soil water, carbon and nitrogen coupling and crop yield[J]. Soils, 2021, 53(5): 952-960. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 张博, 刘泽慈, 汪洁, 李兆壮, 李录山, 胡琳莉, 郁继华. 不同农业废弃物肥料化配方对露地甘蓝生长、产量及品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(8): 1782-1792. |
[2] | 汪洁, 陆若辉, 朱伟锋, 陈钰佩, 单英杰. 浙江省主要粮食作物秸秆还田替代化肥的潜力[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(8): 1853-1863. |
[3] | 雷联. 膜下滴灌调亏对制种玉米植株生长、产量和水分利用的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(7): 1542-1549. |
[4] | 叶雷, 张波, 杨学圳, 李小林, 张小平, 谭伟. 竹屑替代木屑栽培毛木耳的可行性及其品质综合评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(6): 1416-1426. |
[5] | 铁建中, 刘亚昱, 高雪琴, 徐之奇, 胡琳莉, 郁继华. 种养废弃物堆肥对日光温室西葫芦养分利用和土壤性质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(6): 1427-1439. |
[6] | 柴冠群, 周玮, 梁红, 范菲菲, 朱大雁, 范成五. 叶面喷施锌肥和柠檬酸对辣椒产量、品质与Cd吸收转运的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(5): 1069-1079. |
[7] | 檀舒霞, 赵桃弟, 杨豪, 宁可君, 刘丽, 何庆元, 黄守程, 舒英杰. 遮阴对10个菜用大豆品种农艺性状、产量和硝态氮代谢的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(4): 729-735. |
[8] | 马义虎, 曾孝元, 何贤彪, 周奶弟, 陈剑. 浙东南地区优质稻产量与品质对不同播期气候因子的响应[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(4): 736-751. |
[9] | 马新超, 轩正英, 谭占明, 周宇, 王旭峰. 温室沙培黄瓜生产效应的水氮耦合方案优化[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(4): 809-820. |
[10] | 王金凤, 周琦, 吕玉龙, 陈卓梅. 间作景观树种对茶园生态系统与茶叶生产的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(3): 523-533. |
[11] | 林小兵, 张鸿燕, 张秋梅, 周利军, 徐德胜, 郭乃嘉, 邱祥凤, 黄海平. 基于多指标的镉低积累水稻品种筛选[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(11): 2507-2515. |
[12] | 朱雅婷, 倪远之, 张敏, 王振旗, 沈根祥, 黄娜. 不同秸秆还田量对上海地区稻田甲烷排放的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(10): 2436-2445. |
[13] | 于博, 王钰艳, 任琴, 党玉蕾, 张志鹏, 王宇. 秸秆还田对土壤结构和春玉米生长的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(10): 2446-2455. |
[14] | 王犇, 李宇星, 李哲, 姜沣溢, 黄正来, 樊永惠, 张文静, 马尚宇. 海藻糖处理对花后高温胁迫弱筋小麦生选6号产量形成及品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(1): 1-9. |
[15] | 李永晖, 李捷, 冯丽丹, 何静, 张煦, 刘祥林. 不同植物免疫诱抗剂对枸杞鲜果产量、抗病性和贮藏能力的差异比较[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(1): 164-174. |
阅读次数 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
全文 679
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
摘要 466
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||