遮阴对10个菜用大豆品种农艺性状、产量和硝态氮代谢的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2023.04.01

浙江农业学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (4): 729-735.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2023.04.01

遮阴对10个菜用大豆品种农艺性状、产量和硝态氮代谢的影响

檀舒霞¹^,²(), 赵桃弟¹, 杨豪¹, 宁可君¹, 刘丽¹, 何庆元¹, 黄守程¹, 舒英杰¹^,^*()

1.安徽科技学院农学院,安徽凤阳 233100
2.安徽省石台县乡村振兴局,安徽石台 245100

收稿日期:2022-02-13 出版日期:2023-04-25 发布日期:2023-05-05
作者简介:檀舒霞(1990—),女,安徽石台人,硕士,主要从事豆类栽培研究。E-mail: lirn@ahstu.edu.cn
通讯作者: ^*舒英杰,E-mail: shuyj@ahstu.edu.cn
基金资助:
安徽科技学院学术和技术带头人后备人选项目;安徽省蔬菜产业技术体系;安徽省自然科学基金(2008085MC72);安徽省重点研发计划(202104a06020029);安徽科技学院重点项目(2021zrzd13)

Effects of shading on agronomic characters, yield and nitrogen metabolism of 10 vegetable soybean varieties

TAN Shuxia¹^,²(), ZHAO Taodi¹, YANG Hao¹, NING Kejun¹, LIU Li¹, HE Qingyuan¹, HUANG Shoucheng¹, SHU Yingjie¹^,^*()

1. College of Agriculture, Anhui Science and Technology University, Fengyang 233100, Anhui, China
2. Bureau of Rural Revitalization of Shitai County, Shitai 245100, Anhui, China

Received:2022-02-13 Online:2023-04-25 Published:2023-05-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为了筛选出适宜与高秆作物间套作的菜用大豆品种,以10个菜用大豆品种为对象,分别在四叶期和初花期进行遮阴50%的处理,检测其对10个菜用大豆品种农艺性状、产量,以及根系硝态氮( $NO 3 -$ -N)含量和硝酸还原酶(NR)活性的影响,运用综合隶属函数法对10个菜用大豆品种的耐阴性进行比较。结果表明,不同时期遮阴50%,部分菜用大豆品种的株高、结荚高度、分枝高度和根系 $NO 3 -$ -N含量显著(P<0.05)增高,但产量和NR活性显著降低。基于综合隶属函数法评价结果,淮鲜17-08、开鲜3号、淮鲜豆5号、翠绿玉等4个品种的耐阴性较强,适宜与高秆作物间套作。

关键词: 菜用大豆, 耐阴性, 农艺性状, 产量, 氮代谢

Abstract:

In order to screen out suitable vegetable soybean varieties for intercropping with high stem crops, 10 vegetable soybean varieties were selected as test materials. The effects of 50% shading at either four leaf stage or early flowering stage on agronomic characters, yield and root nitrate nitrogen ( $NO 3 -$ -N) content and nitrate reductase (NR) activity were explored. Besides, the shade tolerance of 10 vegetable soybean varieties were determined via comprehensive membership function method. The results showed that, the plant height, pod setting height, branch height and root $NO 3 -$ -N content of some vegetable soybean varieties were significantly (P<0.05) increased, yet the yield and NR activity were significantly decreased under 50% shading. Based on the constructed comprehensive membership function value, it was found that Huaixian17-08, Kaixian No. 3, Huaixiandou No. 5 and Cuilyuyu had stronger shade tolerance, and were suitable for intercropping with high stem crops.

Key words: vegetable soybean, shade tolerance, agronomic traits, yield, nitrogen metabolism

中图分类号:

S565.1

檀舒霞, 赵桃弟, 杨豪, 宁可君, 刘丽, 何庆元, 黄守程, 舒英杰. 遮阴对10个菜用大豆品种农艺性状、产量和硝态氮代谢的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(4): 729-735.

TAN Shuxia, ZHAO Taodi, YANG Hao, NING Kejun, LIU Li, HE Qingyuan, HUANG Shoucheng, SHU Yingjie. Effects of shading on agronomic characters, yield and nitrogen metabolism of 10 vegetable soybean varieties[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(4): 729-735.

图/表 4

表1 不同处理对各品种菜用大豆农艺性状的影响

Table 1 Effects of different treatments on agronomic characters of vegetable soybean variaties

品种 Varieties	处理 Treatment	株高 Plant height/cm	主茎节数 Node number of main stem	结荚高度 Pod setting height/cm	分枝高度 Branch height/cm
翠绿玉	CK	39.20±1.42 b	7.30±0.28 a	7.11±1.29 b	6.10±0.48 a
Cuilyuyu	V	47.30±1.27 a	6.90±0.14 a	8.71±0.44 a	6.89±1.29 a
	R	45.10±3.82 a	7.10±0.14 a	8.10±0.27 a	6.31±0.01 a
淮鲜豆5号	CK	48.10±2.12 b	7.90±0.14 a	7.46±1.07 c	5.62±2.29 b
Huaixiandou No. 5	V	61.70±7.50 a	7.70±0.14 a	9.50±2.18 a	7.38±0.96 a
	R	49.00±4.53 b	7.80±0.28 a	8.59±0.01 b	5.61±0.66 b
淮鲜17-08	CK	42.80±0.85 b	6.80±0.00 a	5.81±2.11 b	4.13±1.57 a
Huaixian17-08	V	52.80±5.37 a	6.30±0.14 a	7.26±1.07 a	4.81±0.27 a
	R	45.80±4.53 ab	6.45±0.64 a	6.97±0.86 a	4.50±0.79 a
辽鲜1号	CK	40.40±1.41 a	6.85±0.35 a	5.79±0.44 b	4.84±0.74 b
Liaoxian No. 1	V	48.90±2.12 a	6.60±0.57 a	8.71±2.67 a	6.15±3.38 a
	R	48.60±0.28 a	6.80±0.85 a	8.31±1.82 a	5.91±1.63 ab
沪宁95-1	CK	44.60±5.37 b	7.50±0.14 a	6.83±2.73 b	5.35±1.97 b
Huning95-1	V	53.90±1.27 a	7.30±0.14 a	8.53±1.51 a	7.07±0.89 a
	R	50.20±3.96 ab	7.25±0.07 a	8.33±2.36 a	6.97±0.27 a
绿宝石	CK	70.80±2.26 b	9.70±0.71 a	8.07±1.32 b	6.44±0.76 b
Lyubaoshi	V	85.20±8.77 a	9.50±0.71 a	11.01±1.74 a	8.59±1.48 a
	R	71.50±2.97 b	9.60±0.85 a	8.56±0.48 b	7.69±0.78 a
开鲜3号	CK	40.50±0.99 b	7.00±0.85 a	7.36±1.61 a	5.09±1.34 a
Kaixian No. 3	V	47.40±1.98 a	6.60±0.00 a	7.91±0.04 a	5.51±0.16 a
	R	44.00±4.24 ab	6.80±1.13 a	7.52±0.03 a	5.36±0.88 a
日本青	CK	43.40±6.22 b	8.00±0.28 a	6.54±1.50 b	4.89±0.95 b
Ribenqing	V	53.80±5.09 a	7.70±0.14 a	9.12±0.99 a	8.34±1.36 a
	R	49.40±1.41 ab	7.90±0.42 a	6.88±0.31 b	7.88±1.36 a
SP-16	CK	101.00±3.11 b	12.10±0.14 a	9.54±0.45 b	10.25±2.14 c
	V	135.80±1.70 a	11.80±1.41 a	10.71±3.15 a	16.51±5.98 a
	R	129.10±5.23 a	12.00±0.28 a	10.09±3.58 ab	12.11±0.69 b
台湾292	CK	48.60±7.35 b	9.00±0.57 a	7.62±2.21 c	6.89±0.95 b
Taiwan292	V	63.80±0.28 a	8.20±0.00 a	10.67±0.18 a	9.52±0.13 a
	R	60.70±6.36 a	8.80±0.28 a	9.33±1.77 b	9.34±1.02 a

表1 不同处理对各品种菜用大豆农艺性状的影响

Table 1 Effects of different treatments on agronomic characters of vegetable soybean variaties

品种 Varieties	处理 Treatment	株高 Plant height/cm	主茎节数 Node number of main stem	结荚高度 Pod setting height/cm	分枝高度 Branch height/cm
翠绿玉	CK	39.20±1.42 b	7.30±0.28 a	7.11±1.29 b	6.10±0.48 a
Cuilyuyu	V	47.30±1.27 a	6.90±0.14 a	8.71±0.44 a	6.89±1.29 a
	R	45.10±3.82 a	7.10±0.14 a	8.10±0.27 a	6.31±0.01 a
淮鲜豆5号	CK	48.10±2.12 b	7.90±0.14 a	7.46±1.07 c	5.62±2.29 b
Huaixiandou No. 5	V	61.70±7.50 a	7.70±0.14 a	9.50±2.18 a	7.38±0.96 a
	R	49.00±4.53 b	7.80±0.28 a	8.59±0.01 b	5.61±0.66 b
淮鲜17-08	CK	42.80±0.85 b	6.80±0.00 a	5.81±2.11 b	4.13±1.57 a
Huaixian17-08	V	52.80±5.37 a	6.30±0.14 a	7.26±1.07 a	4.81±0.27 a
	R	45.80±4.53 ab	6.45±0.64 a	6.97±0.86 a	4.50±0.79 a
辽鲜1号	CK	40.40±1.41 a	6.85±0.35 a	5.79±0.44 b	4.84±0.74 b
Liaoxian No. 1	V	48.90±2.12 a	6.60±0.57 a	8.71±2.67 a	6.15±3.38 a
	R	48.60±0.28 a	6.80±0.85 a	8.31±1.82 a	5.91±1.63 ab
沪宁95-1	CK	44.60±5.37 b	7.50±0.14 a	6.83±2.73 b	5.35±1.97 b
Huning95-1	V	53.90±1.27 a	7.30±0.14 a	8.53±1.51 a	7.07±0.89 a
	R	50.20±3.96 ab	7.25±0.07 a	8.33±2.36 a	6.97±0.27 a
绿宝石	CK	70.80±2.26 b	9.70±0.71 a	8.07±1.32 b	6.44±0.76 b
Lyubaoshi	V	85.20±8.77 a	9.50±0.71 a	11.01±1.74 a	8.59±1.48 a
	R	71.50±2.97 b	9.60±0.85 a	8.56±0.48 b	7.69±0.78 a
开鲜3号	CK	40.50±0.99 b	7.00±0.85 a	7.36±1.61 a	5.09±1.34 a
Kaixian No. 3	V	47.40±1.98 a	6.60±0.00 a	7.91±0.04 a	5.51±0.16 a
	R	44.00±4.24 ab	6.80±1.13 a	7.52±0.03 a	5.36±0.88 a
日本青	CK	43.40±6.22 b	8.00±0.28 a	6.54±1.50 b	4.89±0.95 b
Ribenqing	V	53.80±5.09 a	7.70±0.14 a	9.12±0.99 a	8.34±1.36 a
	R	49.40±1.41 ab	7.90±0.42 a	6.88±0.31 b	7.88±1.36 a
SP-16	CK	101.00±3.11 b	12.10±0.14 a	9.54±0.45 b	10.25±2.14 c
	V	135.80±1.70 a	11.80±1.41 a	10.71±3.15 a	16.51±5.98 a
	R	129.10±5.23 a	12.00±0.28 a	10.09±3.58 ab	12.11±0.69 b
台湾292	CK	48.60±7.35 b	9.00±0.57 a	7.62±2.21 c	6.89±0.95 b
Taiwan292	V	63.80±0.28 a	8.20±0.00 a	10.67±0.18 a	9.52±0.13 a
	R	60.70±6.36 a	8.80±0.28 a	9.33±1.77 b	9.34±1.02 a

表2 不同处理对各品种菜用大豆产量性状的影响

Table 2 Effect of different treatments on yield traits of vegetable soybean varieties

品种 Variety	处理 Treatment	单株荚数 Pods per plant	单株鲜荚重 Fresh pod weight per plant/g	有效荚数 Number of effective pods	单株粒数 Number of seeds per plant	百粒鲜重 Fresh weight of 100 grains/g	小区鲜荚重 Fresh pod weight per plot/kg
翠绿玉	CK	12.60±1.70 a	22.29±2.38 a	12.30±0.71 a	26.70±0.42 a	78.93±0.44 a	1.61±0.06 a
Cuilyuyu	V	9.60±0.85 b	16.80±1.34 b	8.80±0.85 b	18.50±2.97 b	70.90±2.14 b	1.06±0.04 c
	R	11.40±0.85 ab	20.79±0.75 a	10.80±0.28 ab	21.30±0.71 b	75.98±1.18 a	1.34±0.19 b
淮鲜豆5号	CK	17.60±1.41 a	34.25±1.63 a	17.00±1.41 a	36.40±2.83 a	92.00±1.38 a	2.49±0.04 a
Huaixiandou No.5	V	10.30±0.71 b	24.39±0.56 c	8.80±0.28 c	18.50±0.14 c	86.72±0.21 b	1.20±0.01 c
	R	15.60±0.01 a	28.48±1.74 b	14.00±0.85 b	28.10±0.99 b	91.93±3.85 a	1.69±0.08 b
淮鲜17-08	CK	14.40±1.41 a	26.84±0.90 a	13.20±1.41 a	24.70±1.56 a	90.36±0.51 a	1.69±0.03 a
Huaixian17-08	V	11.20±0.28 b	25.78±0.68 a	10.40±0.28 b	19.00±1.13 b	71.68±0.53 b	1.12±0.06 b
	R	11.30±0.49 b	25.90±1.38 a	10.60±0.28 ab	19.30±0.99 b	89.18±0.83 a	1.27±0.10 b
辽鲜1号	CK	18.30±0.99 a	35.30±2.71 a	17.70±0.99 a	36.30±3.25 a	80.82±3.26 a	1.97±0.20 a
Liaoxian No.1	V	12.80±1.41 b	24.15±1.73 b	12.20±0.85 b	23.50±2.12 b	68.17±2.14 b	1.23±0.02 c
	R	13.20±0.92 b	24.95±2.00 b	12.40±0.78 b	23.80±2.26 b	78.77±0.41 a	1.55±0.01 b
沪宁95-1	CK	18.30±1.84 a	28.69±1.09 a	16.20±2.55 a	30.60±2.26 a	90.79±0.09 a	2.28±0.08 a
Huning95-1	V	14.40±1.70 b	22.51±0.36 b	10.70±0.99 b	18.90±1.27 b	78.32±2.57 b	1.07±0.17 c
	R	14.60±0.28 b	25.12±0.03 ab	14.10±0.42 a	21.80±0.28 b	88.77±1.70 a	1.45±0.13 b
绿宝石	CK	22.10±0.42 a	50.14±2.45 a	21.10±1.27 a	46.20±1.70 a	78.42±3.98 a	2.47±0.10 a
Lyubaoshi	V	18.10±0.42 b	37.90±1.00 b	18.10±0.42 b	37.30±0.71 c	62.90±0.63 b	1.13±0.14 b
	R	18.80±0.57 b	36.55±4.16 b	18.30±2.12 b	38.10±2.12 b	77.34±3.10 a	1.17±0.03 b
开鲜3号	CK	18.40±3.11 a	32.71±2.00 a	17.10±0.42 a	36.70±1.56 a	85.80±0.97 a	1.78±0.10 a
Kaixian No.3	V	12.80±0.28 b	24.50±0.84 b	11.40±1.98 b	21.10±1.56 b	72.86±0.64 b	1.14±0.02 c
	R	14.60±1.41 b	25.78±2.90 b	12.90±1.27 b	26.60±0.85 b	83.43±0.67 a	1.44±0.07 b
日本青	CK	18.90±0.71 a	31.69±2.10 a	18.10±1.27 a	33.50±0.99 a	87.47±1.82 a	1.81±0.05 a
Ribenqing	V	11.70±0.42 b	20.16±1.65 c	10.30±1.27 c	19.40±5.66 b	81.57±1.18 b	1.18±0.09 b
	R	16.30±2.40 a	27.15±3.61 b	14.00±2.55 b	22.40±3.39 b	85.85±1.01 a	1.27±0.02 b
SP-16	CK	33.50±1.84 a	90.59±2.25 a	29.00±2.26 a	62.20±0.57 a	93.74±3.42 a	3.41±0.27 a
	V	12.80±1.13 c	17.84±0.62 c	9.00±0.57 c	17.10±1.84 c	71.82±1.31 b	0.69±0.01 c
	R	15.90±2.12 b	33.24±0.31 b	13.20±2.55 b	25.90±5.52 b	88.09±0.80 a	1.64±0.10 b
台湾292	CK	17.40±0.28 a	27.05±1.47 a	14.60±0.85 a	24.60±0.28 a	90.03±0.20 a	1.98±0.04 a
Taiwan292	V	10.40±0.57 c	21.94±0.60 b	8.50±0.14 b	18.10±0.42 b	80.59±0.82 b	1.10±0.02 c
	R	13.90±0.42 b	25.71±1.51 ab	12.10±0.99 a	21.80±0.57 ab	90.42±2.97 a	1.53±0.14 b

表2 不同处理对各品种菜用大豆产量性状的影响

Table 2 Effect of different treatments on yield traits of vegetable soybean varieties

品种 Variety	处理 Treatment	单株荚数 Pods per plant	单株鲜荚重 Fresh pod weight per plant/g	有效荚数 Number of effective pods	单株粒数 Number of seeds per plant	百粒鲜重 Fresh weight of 100 grains/g	小区鲜荚重 Fresh pod weight per plot/kg
翠绿玉	CK	12.60±1.70 a	22.29±2.38 a	12.30±0.71 a	26.70±0.42 a	78.93±0.44 a	1.61±0.06 a
Cuilyuyu	V	9.60±0.85 b	16.80±1.34 b	8.80±0.85 b	18.50±2.97 b	70.90±2.14 b	1.06±0.04 c
	R	11.40±0.85 ab	20.79±0.75 a	10.80±0.28 ab	21.30±0.71 b	75.98±1.18 a	1.34±0.19 b
淮鲜豆5号	CK	17.60±1.41 a	34.25±1.63 a	17.00±1.41 a	36.40±2.83 a	92.00±1.38 a	2.49±0.04 a
Huaixiandou No.5	V	10.30±0.71 b	24.39±0.56 c	8.80±0.28 c	18.50±0.14 c	86.72±0.21 b	1.20±0.01 c
	R	15.60±0.01 a	28.48±1.74 b	14.00±0.85 b	28.10±0.99 b	91.93±3.85 a	1.69±0.08 b
淮鲜17-08	CK	14.40±1.41 a	26.84±0.90 a	13.20±1.41 a	24.70±1.56 a	90.36±0.51 a	1.69±0.03 a
Huaixian17-08	V	11.20±0.28 b	25.78±0.68 a	10.40±0.28 b	19.00±1.13 b	71.68±0.53 b	1.12±0.06 b
	R	11.30±0.49 b	25.90±1.38 a	10.60±0.28 ab	19.30±0.99 b	89.18±0.83 a	1.27±0.10 b
辽鲜1号	CK	18.30±0.99 a	35.30±2.71 a	17.70±0.99 a	36.30±3.25 a	80.82±3.26 a	1.97±0.20 a
Liaoxian No.1	V	12.80±1.41 b	24.15±1.73 b	12.20±0.85 b	23.50±2.12 b	68.17±2.14 b	1.23±0.02 c
	R	13.20±0.92 b	24.95±2.00 b	12.40±0.78 b	23.80±2.26 b	78.77±0.41 a	1.55±0.01 b
沪宁95-1	CK	18.30±1.84 a	28.69±1.09 a	16.20±2.55 a	30.60±2.26 a	90.79±0.09 a	2.28±0.08 a
Huning95-1	V	14.40±1.70 b	22.51±0.36 b	10.70±0.99 b	18.90±1.27 b	78.32±2.57 b	1.07±0.17 c
	R	14.60±0.28 b	25.12±0.03 ab	14.10±0.42 a	21.80±0.28 b	88.77±1.70 a	1.45±0.13 b
绿宝石	CK	22.10±0.42 a	50.14±2.45 a	21.10±1.27 a	46.20±1.70 a	78.42±3.98 a	2.47±0.10 a
Lyubaoshi	V	18.10±0.42 b	37.90±1.00 b	18.10±0.42 b	37.30±0.71 c	62.90±0.63 b	1.13±0.14 b
	R	18.80±0.57 b	36.55±4.16 b	18.30±2.12 b	38.10±2.12 b	77.34±3.10 a	1.17±0.03 b
开鲜3号	CK	18.40±3.11 a	32.71±2.00 a	17.10±0.42 a	36.70±1.56 a	85.80±0.97 a	1.78±0.10 a
Kaixian No.3	V	12.80±0.28 b	24.50±0.84 b	11.40±1.98 b	21.10±1.56 b	72.86±0.64 b	1.14±0.02 c
	R	14.60±1.41 b	25.78±2.90 b	12.90±1.27 b	26.60±0.85 b	83.43±0.67 a	1.44±0.07 b
日本青	CK	18.90±0.71 a	31.69±2.10 a	18.10±1.27 a	33.50±0.99 a	87.47±1.82 a	1.81±0.05 a
Ribenqing	V	11.70±0.42 b	20.16±1.65 c	10.30±1.27 c	19.40±5.66 b	81.57±1.18 b	1.18±0.09 b
	R	16.30±2.40 a	27.15±3.61 b	14.00±2.55 b	22.40±3.39 b	85.85±1.01 a	1.27±0.02 b
SP-16	CK	33.50±1.84 a	90.59±2.25 a	29.00±2.26 a	62.20±0.57 a	93.74±3.42 a	3.41±0.27 a
	V	12.80±1.13 c	17.84±0.62 c	9.00±0.57 c	17.10±1.84 c	71.82±1.31 b	0.69±0.01 c
	R	15.90±2.12 b	33.24±0.31 b	13.20±2.55 b	25.90±5.52 b	88.09±0.80 a	1.64±0.10 b
台湾292	CK	17.40±0.28 a	27.05±1.47 a	14.60±0.85 a	24.60±0.28 a	90.03±0.20 a	1.98±0.04 a
Taiwan292	V	10.40±0.57 c	21.94±0.60 b	8.50±0.14 b	18.10±0.42 b	80.59±0.82 b	1.10±0.02 c
	R	13.90±0.42 b	25.71±1.51 ab	12.10±0.99 a	21.80±0.57 ab	90.42±2.97 a	1.53±0.14 b

表3 不同处理对各品种菜用大豆根系氮代谢的影响

Table 3 Effects of different treatments on root nitrogen metabolism of vegetable soybean varieties

品种 Variety	处理 Treatment	硝态氮含量 $NO 3 -$ -N content/ (μg·g^-1)	硝酸还原酶活性 Nitrate reductase activity/(U·g^-1)
翠绿玉	CK	147.44±22.12 b	20.88±2.75 a
Cuilyuyu	V	152.56±1.81 b	9.67±1.53 b
	R	180.26±8.34 a	10.30±1.17 a
淮鲜豆5号	CK	181.03±3.63 a	12.68±0.38 a
Huaixiandou No.5	V	187.69±5.80 a	10.29±3.26 a
	R	195.38±2.18 a	12.74±1.16 a
淮鲜17-08	CK	150.51±17.77 b	11.83±0.44 a
Huaixian17-08	V	163.08±12.33 b	8.70±3.18 a
	R	186.41±2.54 a	9.32±2.43 a
辽鲜1号	CK	94.36±3.63 b	18.85±0.21 a
Liaoxian No.1	V	227.95±7.61 a	6.52±0.30 c
	R	232.31±2.18 a	14.43±0.48 b
沪宁95-1	CK	225.13±2.90 b	13.07±0.04 a
Huning95-1	V	263.08±1.45 a	3.44±0.39 b
	R	268.46±1.09 a	12.46±0.44 a
绿宝石	CK	138.21±2.54 b	9.27±1.47 a
Lyubaoshi	V	237.44±1.09 a	3.04±0.78 b
	R	240.77±5.08 a	4.22±1.64 b
开鲜3号	CK	134.62±6.16 c	12.84±0.10 a
Kaixian No.3	V	157.44±2.18 b	7.57±1.50 b
	R	219.23±14.87 a	11.58±0.18 a
日本青	CK	152.05±11.97 b	12.90±1.29 a
Ribenqing	V	157.18±13.42 b	11.81±1.06 a
	R	221.28±5.44 a	11.80±0.97 a
SP-16	CK	162.31±9.07 c	10.92±2.44 a
	V	230.77±3.63 b	6.88±1.09 b
	R	333.08±36.62 a	9.99±2.43 ab
台湾292	CK	97.95±2.18 c	15.80±1.17 a
Taiwan292	V	173.59±1.09 b	11.42±2.79 b
	R	265.13±1.45 a	10.28±0.21 b

表3 不同处理对各品种菜用大豆根系氮代谢的影响

Table 3 Effects of different treatments on root nitrogen metabolism of vegetable soybean varieties

品种 Variety	处理 Treatment	硝态氮含量 $NO 3 -$ -N content/ (μg·g^-1)	硝酸还原酶活性 Nitrate reductase activity/(U·g^-1)
翠绿玉	CK	147.44±22.12 b	20.88±2.75 a
Cuilyuyu	V	152.56±1.81 b	9.67±1.53 b
	R	180.26±8.34 a	10.30±1.17 a
淮鲜豆5号	CK	181.03±3.63 a	12.68±0.38 a
Huaixiandou No.5	V	187.69±5.80 a	10.29±3.26 a
	R	195.38±2.18 a	12.74±1.16 a
淮鲜17-08	CK	150.51±17.77 b	11.83±0.44 a
Huaixian17-08	V	163.08±12.33 b	8.70±3.18 a
	R	186.41±2.54 a	9.32±2.43 a
辽鲜1号	CK	94.36±3.63 b	18.85±0.21 a
Liaoxian No.1	V	227.95±7.61 a	6.52±0.30 c
	R	232.31±2.18 a	14.43±0.48 b
沪宁95-1	CK	225.13±2.90 b	13.07±0.04 a
Huning95-1	V	263.08±1.45 a	3.44±0.39 b
	R	268.46±1.09 a	12.46±0.44 a
绿宝石	CK	138.21±2.54 b	9.27±1.47 a
Lyubaoshi	V	237.44±1.09 a	3.04±0.78 b
	R	240.77±5.08 a	4.22±1.64 b
开鲜3号	CK	134.62±6.16 c	12.84±0.10 a
Kaixian No.3	V	157.44±2.18 b	7.57±1.50 b
	R	219.23±14.87 a	11.58±0.18 a
日本青	CK	152.05±11.97 b	12.90±1.29 a
Ribenqing	V	157.18±13.42 b	11.81±1.06 a
	R	221.28±5.44 a	11.80±0.97 a
SP-16	CK	162.31±9.07 c	10.92±2.44 a
	V	230.77±3.63 b	6.88±1.09 b
	R	333.08±36.62 a	9.99±2.43 ab
台湾292	CK	97.95±2.18 c	15.80±1.17 a
Taiwan292	V	173.59±1.09 b	11.42±2.79 b
	R	265.13±1.45 a	10.28±0.21 b

表4 各菜用大豆品种的综合隶属函数值

Table 4 Comprehensive membership function values of ten vegetable soybean varieties

品种 Variety	R₁	R₂	R₃	R₄	R₅	R₆	R₇	R₈	R₉	R₁₀	R₁₁	R₁₂	R	排名 Rank
淮鲜17-08 Huaixian17-08	0.99	0.74	0.60	0.95	0.96	0.94	1.00	0.99	0.98	1.00	0.89	0.82	10.85	1
开鲜3号 Kaixian No. 3	1.00	0.86	1.00	1.00	0.89	0.85	0.90	0.84	0.77	0.96	0.66	0.78	10.50	2
淮鲜豆5号 Huaixiandou No. 5	0.96	1.00	0.48	0.86	1.00	0.85	0.89	0.80	0.77	0.65	1.00	0.99	10.25	3
翠绿玉 Cuilyuyu	0.97	0.86	0.60	0.96	0.87	1.00	0.96	1.00	0.94	1.00	0.93	0.00	10.10	4
日本青 Ribenqing	0.92	0.95	0.53	0.23	0.72	0.84	0.89	0.78	0.78	0.91	0.79	1.00	9.33	5
沪宁95-1 Huning95-1	0.95	0.93	0.47	0.64	0.36	0.90	0.94	0.92	0.84	0.67	0.76	0.59	8.98	6
绿宝石 Lyubaoshi	0.95	1.00	0.43	0.64	0.58	0.91	0.81	0.97	0.89	0.51	0.28	0.54	8.50	7
辽鲜1号 Liaoxian No. 1	0.91	1.00	0.00	0.77	0.92	0.81	0.85	0.94	0.78	0.91	0.00	0.26	8.15	8
台湾292 Taiwan292	0.70	0.67	0.14	0.41	0.75	0.82	0.97	0.88	1.00	0.86	0.11	0.61	7.92	9
SP-16	0	0	0.79	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.13	0.86	1.78	10

参考文献 16

[1]	盖钧镒, 王明军, 陈长之. 中国毛豆生产的历史渊源与发展[J]. 大豆科学, 2002, 21(1): 7-13.
	GAI J Y, WANG M J, CHEN C Z. Historical origin and development of vegetable soybean production in China[J]. Soybean Science, 2002, 21(1): 7-13. (in Chinese)
[2]	王竹, 杨文钰, 伍晓燕, 等. 玉米株型和幅宽对套作大豆初花期形态建成及产量的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2008, 19(2): 323-329.
	WANG Z, YANG W Y, WU X Y, et al. Effects of maize plant type and planting width on the early morphological characters and yield of relayplanted soybean[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2008, 19(2): 323-329. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]	YAO X D, ZHOU H L, ZHU Q, et al. Photosynthetic response of soybean leaf to wide light-fluctuation in maize-soybean intercropping system[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2017, 8: 1695. DOI PMID
[4]	LIU W G, ZOU J L, ZHANG J, et al. Evaluation of soybean (Glycine max) stem vining in maize-soybean relay strip intercropping system[J]. Plant Production Science, 2015, 18(1): 69-75. DOI URL
[5]	王一, 杨文钰, 张霞, 等. 不同生育时期遮阴对大豆形态性状和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2013, 39(10): 1871-1879. DOI
	WANG Y, YANG W Y, ZHANG X, et al. Effects of shading at different growth stages on different traits and yield of soybean[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2013, 39(10): 1871-1879. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI
[6]	于晓波, 张明荣, 吴海英, 等. 净套作下不同耐荫性大豆品种农艺性状及产量分布的研究[J]. 大豆科学, 2012, 31(5): 757-761.
	YU X B, ZHANG M R, WU H Y, et al. Agronomic characters and yield distribution of different shade tolerance soybean under monoculture and relay strip intercropping systems[J]. Soybean Science, 2012, 31(5): 757-761. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]	龚万灼, 吴雨珊, 雍太文, 等. 玉米-大豆带状套作中荫蔽及光照恢复对大豆生长特性与产量的影响[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2015, 37(4): 475-480.
	GONG W Z, WU Y S, YONG T W, et al. Effects of shade and lighting recovery on growth and yield of soybean in maize-soybean relay strip intercropping[J]. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 2015, 37(4): 475-480. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	吴其林, 王竹, 杨文钰. 苗期遮荫对大豆茎秆形态和物质积累的影响[J]. 大豆科学, 2007, 26(6): 868-872.
	WU Q L, WANG Z, YANG W Y. Seedling shading affects morphogenesis and substance accumulation of stem in soybean[J]. Soybean Science, 2007, 26(6): 868-872. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	梁镇林. 耐阴与不耐阴大豆茎叶性状的变异及差异比较研究[J]. 大豆科学, 2000, 19(1): 35-41.
	LIANG Z L. Studies on variation and difference of characters of stem and leaf between shade-enduring and shade-non-enduring soybeans[J]. Soybean Science, 2000, 19(1): 35-41. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]	陈怀珠, 孙祖东, 杨守臻, 等. 荫蔽对大豆主要性状的影响及大豆耐荫性鉴定方法研究初报[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2003, 25(4): 78-82.
	CHEN H Z, SUN Z D, YANG S Z, et al. Effect of shading on major characters of soybean and preliminary study on the identification method of soybean shade endurance[J]. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Scieves, 2003, 25(4): 78-82. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]	邱丽娟, 常汝镇. 大豆种质资源描述规范和数据标准[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006.
[12]	李初英, 孙祖东, 陈怀珠, 等. 不同遮光胁迫对大豆产量性状及产量的影响[J]. 大豆科学, 2006, 25(3): 294-298.
	LI C Y, SUN Z D, CHEN H Z, et al. Study of the influence of shading strss to yield and yield characters of soybean[J]. Soybean Science, 2006, 25(3): 294-298. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]	吴雨珊, 龚万灼, 廖敦平, 等. 带状套作荫蔽及复光对不同大豆品种(系)生长及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2015, 41(11): 1740-1747. DOI
	WU Y S, GONG W Z, LIAO D P, et al. Effects of shade and light recovery on soybean cultivars(lines) and its relationship with yield in relay strip intercropping system[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2015, 41(11): 1740-1747. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
[14]	黄其椿, 李初英, 赵洪涛, 等. 菜用大豆种质资源遮光胁迫下的耐阴性研究[J]. 西南农业学报, 2012, 25(6): 2212-2217.
	HUANG Q C, LI C Y, ZHAO H T, et al. Research of shade-tolerant on vegetable soybean germplasm resources under shading stress[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2012, 25(6): 2212-2217. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]	袁刘正, 李潮海, 王秀萍, 等. 不同玉米自交系耐荫性比较[J]. 玉米科学, 2008, 16(6): 19-23.
	YUAN L Z, LI C H, WANG X P, et al. Comparison of shade-tolerance among different maize(Zea mays L.) inbred lines[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2008, 16(6): 19-23. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]	李春红, 姚兴东, 鞠宝韬, 等. 不同基因型大豆耐荫性分析及其鉴定指标的筛选[J]. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(15): 2927-2939.
	LI C H, YAO X D, JU B T, et al. Analysis of shade-tolerance and determination of shade-tolerance evaluation indicators in different soybean genotypes[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2014, 47(15): 2927-2939. (in Chinese with English abstract)

遮阴对10个菜用大豆品种农艺性状、产量和硝态氮代谢的影响

Effects of shading on agronomic characters, yield and nitrogen metabolism of 10 vegetable soybean varieties

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 4

参考文献 16

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	吴菊, 杨飞, 吴国泉, 傅贤, 徐晨光. 砂培和土壤栽培对黄瓜生长、产量与品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(9): 1905-1913.
[2]	朱为静, 吴佳, 洪春来, 朱凤香, 洪磊东, 张涛, 张硕, 诸惠芬. 秸秆覆盖对土壤水热肥及蟠桃产量和品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(9): 1924-1932.
[3]	张智颖, 邱琴, 侯立娟, 徐平, 蒋宁, 林金盛, 李辉平, 曲绍轩, 马林, 王伟霞, 李福后. 杀虫剂施用对秀珍菇和毛木耳的安全性评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(8): 1733-1742.
[4]	严福林, 郎云虎, 简应权, 陈雄飞, 魏巍, 王志威, 安江勇, 任得强, 丁宁, 魏升华. 八爪金龙药材产量与品质对土壤理化性状的响应[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(8): 1766-1775.
[5]	张智, 何豪豪, 郁妙, 许剑锋. 化肥减量配施土壤改良剂对土壤酸度、土壤养分和水稻产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(6): 1301-1308.
[6]	林小兵, 黎江, 成艳红, 王斌强, 何绍浪, 黄尚书, 黄欠如. 不同有机物料对土壤微生物生物量、矿质氮含量与水稻产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(6): 1309-1318.
[7]	董智超, 岳宁燕, 吕魏, 余晓燚, 郑凯文, 宋海星, 陈海飞. 高、低含油量油菜品种的产量、品质和氮利用效率对施氮量的响应差异[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(5): 998-1008.
[8]	李艳翠, 李福强, 周波. 不同生育期亏缺灌溉对蒙古黄芪光合特性、产量与品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(4): 779-789.
[9]	秦宇坤, 陈俊英, 王玉萍, 张丽娟. 减氮增碳对长江流域棉花生产和氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(4): 869-879.
[10]	应永飞, 韩东轩, 孟芳, 俞遴, 沈佳栾, 汪开英. 沼液替代化肥对水稻产量、品质和土壤特性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(4): 880-891.
[11]	万绍媛, 刘现波, 才硕, 时红, 程婕. 灌溉方式和种植方式对双季稻产量和稻米品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(2): 257-268.
[12]	李灿, 杨婷, 孙乙铭, 陈洪梁, 崔琦, 沈晓霞. 华东覆盆子优势种质资源的筛选与评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(2): 349-364.
[13]	李建强, 魏倩倩, 刘晓霞, 张均华, 朱春权. 优化施肥措施对水稻产量和土壤养分平衡的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(2): 438-446.
[14]	黄玲玲, 叶靖, 翟荣荣, 黄奇, 巫明明, 朱国富, 俞法明, 张小明, 韩金玲, 叶胜海. 水稻籼粳亚种杂交组合的农艺性状与杂种优势[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(10): 2021-2031.
[15]	刘胜男, 朱建义, 李明, 赵浩宇, 熊涛, 汤永禄, 周小刚, 李朝苏. 稻茬免耕带旋播种小麦的田间杂草防除效果与小麦产量[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(10): 2129-2137.