遮阴对10个菜用大豆品种农艺性状、产量和硝态氮代谢的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2023.04.01

浙江农业学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (4): 729-735.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2023.04.01

遮阴对10个菜用大豆品种农艺性状、产量和硝态氮代谢的影响

檀舒霞¹^,²(), 赵桃弟¹, 杨豪¹, 宁可君¹, 刘丽¹, 何庆元¹, 黄守程¹, 舒英杰¹^,^*()

1.安徽科技学院农学院,安徽凤阳 233100
2.安徽省石台县乡村振兴局,安徽石台 245100

收稿日期:2022-02-13 出版日期:2023-04-25 发布日期:2023-05-05
通讯作者: ^*舒英杰,E-mail: shuyj@ahstu.edu.cn
作者简介:檀舒霞(1990—),女,安徽石台人,硕士,主要从事豆类栽培研究。E-mail: lirn@ahstu.edu.cn
基金资助:
安徽科技学院学术和技术带头人后备人选项目;安徽省蔬菜产业技术体系;安徽省自然科学基金(2008085MC72);安徽省重点研发计划(202104a06020029);安徽科技学院重点项目(2021zrzd13)

Effects of shading on agronomic characters, yield and nitrogen metabolism of 10 vegetable soybean varieties

TAN Shuxia¹^,²(), ZHAO Taodi¹, YANG Hao¹, NING Kejun¹, LIU Li¹, HE Qingyuan¹, HUANG Shoucheng¹, SHU Yingjie¹^,^*()

1. College of Agriculture, Anhui Science and Technology University, Fengyang 233100, Anhui, China
2. Bureau of Rural Revitalization of Shitai County, Shitai 245100, Anhui, China

Received:2022-02-13 Online:2023-04-25 Published:2023-05-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为了筛选出适宜与高秆作物间套作的菜用大豆品种,以10个菜用大豆品种为对象,分别在四叶期和初花期进行遮阴50%的处理,检测其对10个菜用大豆品种农艺性状、产量,以及根系硝态氮( $NO 3 -$ -N)含量和硝酸还原酶(NR)活性的影响,运用综合隶属函数法对10个菜用大豆品种的耐阴性进行比较。结果表明,不同时期遮阴50%,部分菜用大豆品种的株高、结荚高度、分枝高度和根系 $NO 3 -$ -N含量显著(P<0.05)增高,但产量和NR活性显著降低。基于综合隶属函数法评价结果,淮鲜17-08、开鲜3号、淮鲜豆5号、翠绿玉等4个品种的耐阴性较强,适宜与高秆作物间套作。

关键词: 菜用大豆, 耐阴性, 农艺性状, 产量, 氮代谢

Abstract:

In order to screen out suitable vegetable soybean varieties for intercropping with high stem crops, 10 vegetable soybean varieties were selected as test materials. The effects of 50% shading at either four leaf stage or early flowering stage on agronomic characters, yield and root nitrate nitrogen ( $NO 3 -$ -N) content and nitrate reductase (NR) activity were explored. Besides, the shade tolerance of 10 vegetable soybean varieties were determined via comprehensive membership function method. The results showed that, the plant height, pod setting height, branch height and root $NO 3 -$ -N content of some vegetable soybean varieties were significantly (P<0.05) increased, yet the yield and NR activity were significantly decreased under 50% shading. Based on the constructed comprehensive membership function value, it was found that Huaixian17-08, Kaixian No. 3, Huaixiandou No. 5 and Cuilyuyu had stronger shade tolerance, and were suitable for intercropping with high stem crops.

Key words: vegetable soybean, shade tolerance, agronomic traits, yield, nitrogen metabolism

中图分类号:

S565.1

檀舒霞, 赵桃弟, 杨豪, 宁可君, 刘丽, 何庆元, 黄守程, 舒英杰. 遮阴对10个菜用大豆品种农艺性状、产量和硝态氮代谢的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(4): 729-735.

TAN Shuxia, ZHAO Taodi, YANG Hao, NING Kejun, LIU Li, HE Qingyuan, HUANG Shoucheng, SHU Yingjie. Effects of shading on agronomic characters, yield and nitrogen metabolism of 10 vegetable soybean varieties[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(4): 729-735.

图/表 4

表1 不同处理对各品种菜用大豆农艺性状的影响

Table 1 Effects of different treatments on agronomic characters of vegetable soybean variaties

品种 Varieties	处理 Treatment	株高 Plant height/cm	主茎节数 Node number of main stem	结荚高度 Pod setting height/cm	分枝高度 Branch height/cm
翠绿玉	CK	39.20±1.42 b	7.30±0.28 a	7.11±1.29 b	6.10±0.48 a
Cuilyuyu	V	47.30±1.27 a	6.90±0.14 a	8.71±0.44 a	6.89±1.29 a
	R	45.10±3.82 a	7.10±0.14 a	8.10±0.27 a	6.31±0.01 a
淮鲜豆5号	CK	48.10±2.12 b	7.90±0.14 a	7.46±1.07 c	5.62±2.29 b
Huaixiandou No. 5	V	61.70±7.50 a	7.70±0.14 a	9.50±2.18 a	7.38±0.96 a
	R	49.00±4.53 b	7.80±0.28 a	8.59±0.01 b	5.61±0.66 b
淮鲜17-08	CK	42.80±0.85 b	6.80±0.00 a	5.81±2.11 b	4.13±1.57 a
Huaixian17-08	V	52.80±5.37 a	6.30±0.14 a	7.26±1.07 a	4.81±0.27 a
	R	45.80±4.53 ab	6.45±0.64 a	6.97±0.86 a	4.50±0.79 a
辽鲜1号	CK	40.40±1.41 a	6.85±0.35 a	5.79±0.44 b	4.84±0.74 b
Liaoxian No. 1	V	48.90±2.12 a	6.60±0.57 a	8.71±2.67 a	6.15±3.38 a
	R	48.60±0.28 a	6.80±0.85 a	8.31±1.82 a	5.91±1.63 ab
沪宁95-1	CK	44.60±5.37 b	7.50±0.14 a	6.83±2.73 b	5.35±1.97 b
Huning95-1	V	53.90±1.27 a	7.30±0.14 a	8.53±1.51 a	7.07±0.89 a
	R	50.20±3.96 ab	7.25±0.07 a	8.33±2.36 a	6.97±0.27 a
绿宝石	CK	70.80±2.26 b	9.70±0.71 a	8.07±1.32 b	6.44±0.76 b
Lyubaoshi	V	85.20±8.77 a	9.50±0.71 a	11.01±1.74 a	8.59±1.48 a
	R	71.50±2.97 b	9.60±0.85 a	8.56±0.48 b	7.69±0.78 a
开鲜3号	CK	40.50±0.99 b	7.00±0.85 a	7.36±1.61 a	5.09±1.34 a
Kaixian No. 3	V	47.40±1.98 a	6.60±0.00 a	7.91±0.04 a	5.51±0.16 a
	R	44.00±4.24 ab	6.80±1.13 a	7.52±0.03 a	5.36±0.88 a
日本青	CK	43.40±6.22 b	8.00±0.28 a	6.54±1.50 b	4.89±0.95 b
Ribenqing	V	53.80±5.09 a	7.70±0.14 a	9.12±0.99 a	8.34±1.36 a
	R	49.40±1.41 ab	7.90±0.42 a	6.88±0.31 b	7.88±1.36 a
SP-16	CK	101.00±3.11 b	12.10±0.14 a	9.54±0.45 b	10.25±2.14 c
	V	135.80±1.70 a	11.80±1.41 a	10.71±3.15 a	16.51±5.98 a
	R	129.10±5.23 a	12.00±0.28 a	10.09±3.58 ab	12.11±0.69 b
台湾292	CK	48.60±7.35 b	9.00±0.57 a	7.62±2.21 c	6.89±0.95 b
Taiwan292	V	63.80±0.28 a	8.20±0.00 a	10.67±0.18 a	9.52±0.13 a
	R	60.70±6.36 a	8.80±0.28 a	9.33±1.77 b	9.34±1.02 a

表1 不同处理对各品种菜用大豆农艺性状的影响

Table 1 Effects of different treatments on agronomic characters of vegetable soybean variaties

品种 Varieties	处理 Treatment	株高 Plant height/cm	主茎节数 Node number of main stem	结荚高度 Pod setting height/cm	分枝高度 Branch height/cm
翠绿玉	CK	39.20±1.42 b	7.30±0.28 a	7.11±1.29 b	6.10±0.48 a
Cuilyuyu	V	47.30±1.27 a	6.90±0.14 a	8.71±0.44 a	6.89±1.29 a
	R	45.10±3.82 a	7.10±0.14 a	8.10±0.27 a	6.31±0.01 a
淮鲜豆5号	CK	48.10±2.12 b	7.90±0.14 a	7.46±1.07 c	5.62±2.29 b
Huaixiandou No. 5	V	61.70±7.50 a	7.70±0.14 a	9.50±2.18 a	7.38±0.96 a
	R	49.00±4.53 b	7.80±0.28 a	8.59±0.01 b	5.61±0.66 b
淮鲜17-08	CK	42.80±0.85 b	6.80±0.00 a	5.81±2.11 b	4.13±1.57 a
Huaixian17-08	V	52.80±5.37 a	6.30±0.14 a	7.26±1.07 a	4.81±0.27 a
	R	45.80±4.53 ab	6.45±0.64 a	6.97±0.86 a	4.50±0.79 a
辽鲜1号	CK	40.40±1.41 a	6.85±0.35 a	5.79±0.44 b	4.84±0.74 b
Liaoxian No. 1	V	48.90±2.12 a	6.60±0.57 a	8.71±2.67 a	6.15±3.38 a
	R	48.60±0.28 a	6.80±0.85 a	8.31±1.82 a	5.91±1.63 ab
沪宁95-1	CK	44.60±5.37 b	7.50±0.14 a	6.83±2.73 b	5.35±1.97 b
Huning95-1	V	53.90±1.27 a	7.30±0.14 a	8.53±1.51 a	7.07±0.89 a
	R	50.20±3.96 ab	7.25±0.07 a	8.33±2.36 a	6.97±0.27 a
绿宝石	CK	70.80±2.26 b	9.70±0.71 a	8.07±1.32 b	6.44±0.76 b
Lyubaoshi	V	85.20±8.77 a	9.50±0.71 a	11.01±1.74 a	8.59±1.48 a
	R	71.50±2.97 b	9.60±0.85 a	8.56±0.48 b	7.69±0.78 a
开鲜3号	CK	40.50±0.99 b	7.00±0.85 a	7.36±1.61 a	5.09±1.34 a
Kaixian No. 3	V	47.40±1.98 a	6.60±0.00 a	7.91±0.04 a	5.51±0.16 a
	R	44.00±4.24 ab	6.80±1.13 a	7.52±0.03 a	5.36±0.88 a
日本青	CK	43.40±6.22 b	8.00±0.28 a	6.54±1.50 b	4.89±0.95 b
Ribenqing	V	53.80±5.09 a	7.70±0.14 a	9.12±0.99 a	8.34±1.36 a
	R	49.40±1.41 ab	7.90±0.42 a	6.88±0.31 b	7.88±1.36 a
SP-16	CK	101.00±3.11 b	12.10±0.14 a	9.54±0.45 b	10.25±2.14 c
	V	135.80±1.70 a	11.80±1.41 a	10.71±3.15 a	16.51±5.98 a
	R	129.10±5.23 a	12.00±0.28 a	10.09±3.58 ab	12.11±0.69 b
台湾292	CK	48.60±7.35 b	9.00±0.57 a	7.62±2.21 c	6.89±0.95 b
Taiwan292	V	63.80±0.28 a	8.20±0.00 a	10.67±0.18 a	9.52±0.13 a
	R	60.70±6.36 a	8.80±0.28 a	9.33±1.77 b	9.34±1.02 a

表2 不同处理对各品种菜用大豆产量性状的影响

Table 2 Effect of different treatments on yield traits of vegetable soybean varieties

品种 Variety	处理 Treatment	单株荚数 Pods per plant	单株鲜荚重 Fresh pod weight per plant/g	有效荚数 Number of effective pods	单株粒数 Number of seeds per plant	百粒鲜重 Fresh weight of 100 grains/g	小区鲜荚重 Fresh pod weight per plot/kg
翠绿玉	CK	12.60±1.70 a	22.29±2.38 a	12.30±0.71 a	26.70±0.42 a	78.93±0.44 a	1.61±0.06 a
Cuilyuyu	V	9.60±0.85 b	16.80±1.34 b	8.80±0.85 b	18.50±2.97 b	70.90±2.14 b	1.06±0.04 c
	R	11.40±0.85 ab	20.79±0.75 a	10.80±0.28 ab	21.30±0.71 b	75.98±1.18 a	1.34±0.19 b
淮鲜豆5号	CK	17.60±1.41 a	34.25±1.63 a	17.00±1.41 a	36.40±2.83 a	92.00±1.38 a	2.49±0.04 a
Huaixiandou No.5	V	10.30±0.71 b	24.39±0.56 c	8.80±0.28 c	18.50±0.14 c	86.72±0.21 b	1.20±0.01 c
	R	15.60±0.01 a	28.48±1.74 b	14.00±0.85 b	28.10±0.99 b	91.93±3.85 a	1.69±0.08 b
淮鲜17-08	CK	14.40±1.41 a	26.84±0.90 a	13.20±1.41 a	24.70±1.56 a	90.36±0.51 a	1.69±0.03 a
Huaixian17-08	V	11.20±0.28 b	25.78±0.68 a	10.40±0.28 b	19.00±1.13 b	71.68±0.53 b	1.12±0.06 b
	R	11.30±0.49 b	25.90±1.38 a	10.60±0.28 ab	19.30±0.99 b	89.18±0.83 a	1.27±0.10 b
辽鲜1号	CK	18.30±0.99 a	35.30±2.71 a	17.70±0.99 a	36.30±3.25 a	80.82±3.26 a	1.97±0.20 a
Liaoxian No.1	V	12.80±1.41 b	24.15±1.73 b	12.20±0.85 b	23.50±2.12 b	68.17±2.14 b	1.23±0.02 c
	R	13.20±0.92 b	24.95±2.00 b	12.40±0.78 b	23.80±2.26 b	78.77±0.41 a	1.55±0.01 b
沪宁95-1	CK	18.30±1.84 a	28.69±1.09 a	16.20±2.55 a	30.60±2.26 a	90.79±0.09 a	2.28±0.08 a
Huning95-1	V	14.40±1.70 b	22.51±0.36 b	10.70±0.99 b	18.90±1.27 b	78.32±2.57 b	1.07±0.17 c
	R	14.60±0.28 b	25.12±0.03 ab	14.10±0.42 a	21.80±0.28 b	88.77±1.70 a	1.45±0.13 b
绿宝石	CK	22.10±0.42 a	50.14±2.45 a	21.10±1.27 a	46.20±1.70 a	78.42±3.98 a	2.47±0.10 a
Lyubaoshi	V	18.10±0.42 b	37.90±1.00 b	18.10±0.42 b	37.30±0.71 c	62.90±0.63 b	1.13±0.14 b
	R	18.80±0.57 b	36.55±4.16 b	18.30±2.12 b	38.10±2.12 b	77.34±3.10 a	1.17±0.03 b
开鲜3号	CK	18.40±3.11 a	32.71±2.00 a	17.10±0.42 a	36.70±1.56 a	85.80±0.97 a	1.78±0.10 a
Kaixian No.3	V	12.80±0.28 b	24.50±0.84 b	11.40±1.98 b	21.10±1.56 b	72.86±0.64 b	1.14±0.02 c
	R	14.60±1.41 b	25.78±2.90 b	12.90±1.27 b	26.60±0.85 b	83.43±0.67 a	1.44±0.07 b
日本青	CK	18.90±0.71 a	31.69±2.10 a	18.10±1.27 a	33.50±0.99 a	87.47±1.82 a	1.81±0.05 a
Ribenqing	V	11.70±0.42 b	20.16±1.65 c	10.30±1.27 c	19.40±5.66 b	81.57±1.18 b	1.18±0.09 b
	R	16.30±2.40 a	27.15±3.61 b	14.00±2.55 b	22.40±3.39 b	85.85±1.01 a	1.27±0.02 b
SP-16	CK	33.50±1.84 a	90.59±2.25 a	29.00±2.26 a	62.20±0.57 a	93.74±3.42 a	3.41±0.27 a
	V	12.80±1.13 c	17.84±0.62 c	9.00±0.57 c	17.10±1.84 c	71.82±1.31 b	0.69±0.01 c
	R	15.90±2.12 b	33.24±0.31 b	13.20±2.55 b	25.90±5.52 b	88.09±0.80 a	1.64±0.10 b
台湾292	CK	17.40±0.28 a	27.05±1.47 a	14.60±0.85 a	24.60±0.28 a	90.03±0.20 a	1.98±0.04 a
Taiwan292	V	10.40±0.57 c	21.94±0.60 b	8.50±0.14 b	18.10±0.42 b	80.59±0.82 b	1.10±0.02 c
	R	13.90±0.42 b	25.71±1.51 ab	12.10±0.99 a	21.80±0.57 ab	90.42±2.97 a	1.53±0.14 b

表2 不同处理对各品种菜用大豆产量性状的影响

Table 2 Effect of different treatments on yield traits of vegetable soybean varieties

品种 Variety	处理 Treatment	单株荚数 Pods per plant	单株鲜荚重 Fresh pod weight per plant/g	有效荚数 Number of effective pods	单株粒数 Number of seeds per plant	百粒鲜重 Fresh weight of 100 grains/g	小区鲜荚重 Fresh pod weight per plot/kg
翠绿玉	CK	12.60±1.70 a	22.29±2.38 a	12.30±0.71 a	26.70±0.42 a	78.93±0.44 a	1.61±0.06 a
Cuilyuyu	V	9.60±0.85 b	16.80±1.34 b	8.80±0.85 b	18.50±2.97 b	70.90±2.14 b	1.06±0.04 c
	R	11.40±0.85 ab	20.79±0.75 a	10.80±0.28 ab	21.30±0.71 b	75.98±1.18 a	1.34±0.19 b
淮鲜豆5号	CK	17.60±1.41 a	34.25±1.63 a	17.00±1.41 a	36.40±2.83 a	92.00±1.38 a	2.49±0.04 a
Huaixiandou No.5	V	10.30±0.71 b	24.39±0.56 c	8.80±0.28 c	18.50±0.14 c	86.72±0.21 b	1.20±0.01 c
	R	15.60±0.01 a	28.48±1.74 b	14.00±0.85 b	28.10±0.99 b	91.93±3.85 a	1.69±0.08 b
淮鲜17-08	CK	14.40±1.41 a	26.84±0.90 a	13.20±1.41 a	24.70±1.56 a	90.36±0.51 a	1.69±0.03 a
Huaixian17-08	V	11.20±0.28 b	25.78±0.68 a	10.40±0.28 b	19.00±1.13 b	71.68±0.53 b	1.12±0.06 b
	R	11.30±0.49 b	25.90±1.38 a	10.60±0.28 ab	19.30±0.99 b	89.18±0.83 a	1.27±0.10 b
辽鲜1号	CK	18.30±0.99 a	35.30±2.71 a	17.70±0.99 a	36.30±3.25 a	80.82±3.26 a	1.97±0.20 a
Liaoxian No.1	V	12.80±1.41 b	24.15±1.73 b	12.20±0.85 b	23.50±2.12 b	68.17±2.14 b	1.23±0.02 c
	R	13.20±0.92 b	24.95±2.00 b	12.40±0.78 b	23.80±2.26 b	78.77±0.41 a	1.55±0.01 b
沪宁95-1	CK	18.30±1.84 a	28.69±1.09 a	16.20±2.55 a	30.60±2.26 a	90.79±0.09 a	2.28±0.08 a
Huning95-1	V	14.40±1.70 b	22.51±0.36 b	10.70±0.99 b	18.90±1.27 b	78.32±2.57 b	1.07±0.17 c
	R	14.60±0.28 b	25.12±0.03 ab	14.10±0.42 a	21.80±0.28 b	88.77±1.70 a	1.45±0.13 b
绿宝石	CK	22.10±0.42 a	50.14±2.45 a	21.10±1.27 a	46.20±1.70 a	78.42±3.98 a	2.47±0.10 a
Lyubaoshi	V	18.10±0.42 b	37.90±1.00 b	18.10±0.42 b	37.30±0.71 c	62.90±0.63 b	1.13±0.14 b
	R	18.80±0.57 b	36.55±4.16 b	18.30±2.12 b	38.10±2.12 b	77.34±3.10 a	1.17±0.03 b
开鲜3号	CK	18.40±3.11 a	32.71±2.00 a	17.10±0.42 a	36.70±1.56 a	85.80±0.97 a	1.78±0.10 a
Kaixian No.3	V	12.80±0.28 b	24.50±0.84 b	11.40±1.98 b	21.10±1.56 b	72.86±0.64 b	1.14±0.02 c
	R	14.60±1.41 b	25.78±2.90 b	12.90±1.27 b	26.60±0.85 b	83.43±0.67 a	1.44±0.07 b
日本青	CK	18.90±0.71 a	31.69±2.10 a	18.10±1.27 a	33.50±0.99 a	87.47±1.82 a	1.81±0.05 a
Ribenqing	V	11.70±0.42 b	20.16±1.65 c	10.30±1.27 c	19.40±5.66 b	81.57±1.18 b	1.18±0.09 b
	R	16.30±2.40 a	27.15±3.61 b	14.00±2.55 b	22.40±3.39 b	85.85±1.01 a	1.27±0.02 b
SP-16	CK	33.50±1.84 a	90.59±2.25 a	29.00±2.26 a	62.20±0.57 a	93.74±3.42 a	3.41±0.27 a
	V	12.80±1.13 c	17.84±0.62 c	9.00±0.57 c	17.10±1.84 c	71.82±1.31 b	0.69±0.01 c
	R	15.90±2.12 b	33.24±0.31 b	13.20±2.55 b	25.90±5.52 b	88.09±0.80 a	1.64±0.10 b
台湾292	CK	17.40±0.28 a	27.05±1.47 a	14.60±0.85 a	24.60±0.28 a	90.03±0.20 a	1.98±0.04 a
Taiwan292	V	10.40±0.57 c	21.94±0.60 b	8.50±0.14 b	18.10±0.42 b	80.59±0.82 b	1.10±0.02 c
	R	13.90±0.42 b	25.71±1.51 ab	12.10±0.99 a	21.80±0.57 ab	90.42±2.97 a	1.53±0.14 b

表3 不同处理对各品种菜用大豆根系氮代谢的影响

Table 3 Effects of different treatments on root nitrogen metabolism of vegetable soybean varieties

品种 Variety	处理 Treatment	硝态氮含量 $NO 3 -$ -N content/ (μg·g^-1)	硝酸还原酶活性 Nitrate reductase activity/(U·g^-1)
翠绿玉	CK	147.44±22.12 b	20.88±2.75 a
Cuilyuyu	V	152.56±1.81 b	9.67±1.53 b
	R	180.26±8.34 a	10.30±1.17 a
淮鲜豆5号	CK	181.03±3.63 a	12.68±0.38 a
Huaixiandou No.5	V	187.69±5.80 a	10.29±3.26 a
	R	195.38±2.18 a	12.74±1.16 a
淮鲜17-08	CK	150.51±17.77 b	11.83±0.44 a
Huaixian17-08	V	163.08±12.33 b	8.70±3.18 a
	R	186.41±2.54 a	9.32±2.43 a
辽鲜1号	CK	94.36±3.63 b	18.85±0.21 a
Liaoxian No.1	V	227.95±7.61 a	6.52±0.30 c
	R	232.31±2.18 a	14.43±0.48 b
沪宁95-1	CK	225.13±2.90 b	13.07±0.04 a
Huning95-1	V	263.08±1.45 a	3.44±0.39 b
	R	268.46±1.09 a	12.46±0.44 a
绿宝石	CK	138.21±2.54 b	9.27±1.47 a
Lyubaoshi	V	237.44±1.09 a	3.04±0.78 b
	R	240.77±5.08 a	4.22±1.64 b
开鲜3号	CK	134.62±6.16 c	12.84±0.10 a
Kaixian No.3	V	157.44±2.18 b	7.57±1.50 b
	R	219.23±14.87 a	11.58±0.18 a
日本青	CK	152.05±11.97 b	12.90±1.29 a
Ribenqing	V	157.18±13.42 b	11.81±1.06 a
	R	221.28±5.44 a	11.80±0.97 a
SP-16	CK	162.31±9.07 c	10.92±2.44 a
	V	230.77±3.63 b	6.88±1.09 b
	R	333.08±36.62 a	9.99±2.43 ab
台湾292	CK	97.95±2.18 c	15.80±1.17 a
Taiwan292	V	173.59±1.09 b	11.42±2.79 b
	R	265.13±1.45 a	10.28±0.21 b

表3 不同处理对各品种菜用大豆根系氮代谢的影响

Table 3 Effects of different treatments on root nitrogen metabolism of vegetable soybean varieties

品种 Variety	处理 Treatment	硝态氮含量 $NO 3 -$ -N content/ (μg·g^-1)	硝酸还原酶活性 Nitrate reductase activity/(U·g^-1)
翠绿玉	CK	147.44±22.12 b	20.88±2.75 a
Cuilyuyu	V	152.56±1.81 b	9.67±1.53 b
	R	180.26±8.34 a	10.30±1.17 a
淮鲜豆5号	CK	181.03±3.63 a	12.68±0.38 a
Huaixiandou No.5	V	187.69±5.80 a	10.29±3.26 a
	R	195.38±2.18 a	12.74±1.16 a
淮鲜17-08	CK	150.51±17.77 b	11.83±0.44 a
Huaixian17-08	V	163.08±12.33 b	8.70±3.18 a
	R	186.41±2.54 a	9.32±2.43 a
辽鲜1号	CK	94.36±3.63 b	18.85±0.21 a
Liaoxian No.1	V	227.95±7.61 a	6.52±0.30 c
	R	232.31±2.18 a	14.43±0.48 b
沪宁95-1	CK	225.13±2.90 b	13.07±0.04 a
Huning95-1	V	263.08±1.45 a	3.44±0.39 b
	R	268.46±1.09 a	12.46±0.44 a
绿宝石	CK	138.21±2.54 b	9.27±1.47 a
Lyubaoshi	V	237.44±1.09 a	3.04±0.78 b
	R	240.77±5.08 a	4.22±1.64 b
开鲜3号	CK	134.62±6.16 c	12.84±0.10 a
Kaixian No.3	V	157.44±2.18 b	7.57±1.50 b
	R	219.23±14.87 a	11.58±0.18 a
日本青	CK	152.05±11.97 b	12.90±1.29 a
Ribenqing	V	157.18±13.42 b	11.81±1.06 a
	R	221.28±5.44 a	11.80±0.97 a
SP-16	CK	162.31±9.07 c	10.92±2.44 a
	V	230.77±3.63 b	6.88±1.09 b
	R	333.08±36.62 a	9.99±2.43 ab
台湾292	CK	97.95±2.18 c	15.80±1.17 a
Taiwan292	V	173.59±1.09 b	11.42±2.79 b
	R	265.13±1.45 a	10.28±0.21 b

表4 各菜用大豆品种的综合隶属函数值

Table 4 Comprehensive membership function values of ten vegetable soybean varieties

品种 Variety	R₁	R₂	R₃	R₄	R₅	R₆	R₇	R₈	R₉	R₁₀	R₁₁	R₁₂	R	排名 Rank
淮鲜17-08 Huaixian17-08	0.99	0.74	0.60	0.95	0.96	0.94	1.00	0.99	0.98	1.00	0.89	0.82	10.85	1
开鲜3号 Kaixian No. 3	1.00	0.86	1.00	1.00	0.89	0.85	0.90	0.84	0.77	0.96	0.66	0.78	10.50	2
淮鲜豆5号 Huaixiandou No. 5	0.96	1.00	0.48	0.86	1.00	0.85	0.89	0.80	0.77	0.65	1.00	0.99	10.25	3
翠绿玉 Cuilyuyu	0.97	0.86	0.60	0.96	0.87	1.00	0.96	1.00	0.94	1.00	0.93	0.00	10.10	4
日本青 Ribenqing	0.92	0.95	0.53	0.23	0.72	0.84	0.89	0.78	0.78	0.91	0.79	1.00	9.33	5
沪宁95-1 Huning95-1	0.95	0.93	0.47	0.64	0.36	0.90	0.94	0.92	0.84	0.67	0.76	0.59	8.98	6
绿宝石 Lyubaoshi	0.95	1.00	0.43	0.64	0.58	0.91	0.81	0.97	0.89	0.51	0.28	0.54	8.50	7
辽鲜1号 Liaoxian No. 1	0.91	1.00	0.00	0.77	0.92	0.81	0.85	0.94	0.78	0.91	0.00	0.26	8.15	8
台湾292 Taiwan292	0.70	0.67	0.14	0.41	0.75	0.82	0.97	0.88	1.00	0.86	0.11	0.61	7.92	9
SP-16	0	0	0.79	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.13	0.86	1.78	10

参考文献 16

[1]	盖钧镒, 王明军, 陈长之. 中国毛豆生产的历史渊源与发展[J]. 大豆科学, 2002, 21(1): 7-13.
	GAI J Y, WANG M J, CHEN C Z. Historical origin and development of vegetable soybean production in China[J]. Soybean Science, 2002, 21(1): 7-13. (in Chinese)
[2]	王竹, 杨文钰, 伍晓燕, 等. 玉米株型和幅宽对套作大豆初花期形态建成及产量的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2008, 19(2): 323-329.
	WANG Z, YANG W Y, WU X Y, et al. Effects of maize plant type and planting width on the early morphological characters and yield of relayplanted soybean[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2008, 19(2): 323-329. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]	YAO X D, ZHOU H L, ZHU Q, et al. Photosynthetic response of soybean leaf to wide light-fluctuation in maize-soybean intercropping system[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2017, 8: 1695. DOI PMID
[4]	LIU W G, ZOU J L, ZHANG J, et al. Evaluation of soybean (Glycine max) stem vining in maize-soybean relay strip intercropping system[J]. Plant Production Science, 2015, 18(1): 69-75. DOI URL
[5]	王一, 杨文钰, 张霞, 等. 不同生育时期遮阴对大豆形态性状和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2013, 39(10): 1871-1879. DOI
	WANG Y, YANG W Y, ZHANG X, et al. Effects of shading at different growth stages on different traits and yield of soybean[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2013, 39(10): 1871-1879. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI
[6]	于晓波, 张明荣, 吴海英, 等. 净套作下不同耐荫性大豆品种农艺性状及产量分布的研究[J]. 大豆科学, 2012, 31(5): 757-761.
	YU X B, ZHANG M R, WU H Y, et al. Agronomic characters and yield distribution of different shade tolerance soybean under monoculture and relay strip intercropping systems[J]. Soybean Science, 2012, 31(5): 757-761. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]	龚万灼, 吴雨珊, 雍太文, 等. 玉米-大豆带状套作中荫蔽及光照恢复对大豆生长特性与产量的影响[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2015, 37(4): 475-480.
	GONG W Z, WU Y S, YONG T W, et al. Effects of shade and lighting recovery on growth and yield of soybean in maize-soybean relay strip intercropping[J]. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 2015, 37(4): 475-480. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	吴其林, 王竹, 杨文钰. 苗期遮荫对大豆茎秆形态和物质积累的影响[J]. 大豆科学, 2007, 26(6): 868-872.
	WU Q L, WANG Z, YANG W Y. Seedling shading affects morphogenesis and substance accumulation of stem in soybean[J]. Soybean Science, 2007, 26(6): 868-872. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	梁镇林. 耐阴与不耐阴大豆茎叶性状的变异及差异比较研究[J]. 大豆科学, 2000, 19(1): 35-41.
	LIANG Z L. Studies on variation and difference of characters of stem and leaf between shade-enduring and shade-non-enduring soybeans[J]. Soybean Science, 2000, 19(1): 35-41. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]	陈怀珠, 孙祖东, 杨守臻, 等. 荫蔽对大豆主要性状的影响及大豆耐荫性鉴定方法研究初报[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2003, 25(4): 78-82.
	CHEN H Z, SUN Z D, YANG S Z, et al. Effect of shading on major characters of soybean and preliminary study on the identification method of soybean shade endurance[J]. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Scieves, 2003, 25(4): 78-82. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]	邱丽娟, 常汝镇. 大豆种质资源描述规范和数据标准[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006.
[12]	李初英, 孙祖东, 陈怀珠, 等. 不同遮光胁迫对大豆产量性状及产量的影响[J]. 大豆科学, 2006, 25(3): 294-298.
	LI C Y, SUN Z D, CHEN H Z, et al. Study of the influence of shading strss to yield and yield characters of soybean[J]. Soybean Science, 2006, 25(3): 294-298. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]	吴雨珊, 龚万灼, 廖敦平, 等. 带状套作荫蔽及复光对不同大豆品种(系)生长及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2015, 41(11): 1740-1747. DOI
	WU Y S, GONG W Z, LIAO D P, et al. Effects of shade and light recovery on soybean cultivars(lines) and its relationship with yield in relay strip intercropping system[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2015, 41(11): 1740-1747. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
[14]	黄其椿, 李初英, 赵洪涛, 等. 菜用大豆种质资源遮光胁迫下的耐阴性研究[J]. 西南农业学报, 2012, 25(6): 2212-2217.
	HUANG Q C, LI C Y, ZHAO H T, et al. Research of shade-tolerant on vegetable soybean germplasm resources under shading stress[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2012, 25(6): 2212-2217. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]	袁刘正, 李潮海, 王秀萍, 等. 不同玉米自交系耐荫性比较[J]. 玉米科学, 2008, 16(6): 19-23.
	YUAN L Z, LI C H, WANG X P, et al. Comparison of shade-tolerance among different maize(Zea mays L.) inbred lines[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2008, 16(6): 19-23. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]	李春红, 姚兴东, 鞠宝韬, 等. 不同基因型大豆耐荫性分析及其鉴定指标的筛选[J]. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(15): 2927-2939.
	LI C H, YAO X D, JU B T, et al. Analysis of shade-tolerance and determination of shade-tolerance evaluation indicators in different soybean genotypes[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2014, 47(15): 2927-2939. (in Chinese with English abstract)

遮阴对10个菜用大豆品种农艺性状、产量和硝态氮代谢的影响

Effects of shading on agronomic characters, yield and nitrogen metabolism of 10 vegetable soybean varieties

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 4

参考文献 16

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	柴冠群, 周玮, 梁红, 范菲菲, 朱大雁, 范成五. 叶面喷施锌肥和柠檬酸对辣椒产量、品质与Cd吸收转运的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(5): 1069-1079.
[2]	黄正, 张荣萍, 马鹏, 张琪, 周宁宁, 阿什日轨, 冯婷煜, 周林. 冬水田油菜秸秆还田和氮肥运筹对杂交稻干物质积累和产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(5): 983-991.
[3]	马义虎, 曾孝元, 何贤彪, 周奶弟, 陈剑. 浙东南地区优质稻产量与品质对不同播期气候因子的响应[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(4): 736-751.
[4]	马新超, 轩正英, 谭占明, 周宇, 王旭峰. 温室沙培黄瓜生产效应的水氮耦合方案优化[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(4): 809-820.
[5]	朱丽, 薛新如, 梁宗旭, 许琳玉, 余国峰, 唐懿, 李焕秀. 辣椒种质资源辣椒素含量与农艺性状的相关性[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(4): 862-872.
[6]	王金凤, 周琦, 吕玉龙, 陈卓梅. 间作景观树种对茶园生态系统与茶叶生产的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(3): 523-533.
[7]	王犇, 李宇星, 李哲, 姜沣溢, 黄正来, 樊永惠, 张文静, 马尚宇. 海藻糖处理对花后高温胁迫弱筋小麦生选6号产量形成及品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(1): 1-9.
[8]	李永晖, 李捷, 冯丽丹, 何静, 张煦, 刘祥林. 不同植物免疫诱抗剂对枸杞鲜果产量、抗病性和贮藏能力的差异比较[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(1): 164-174.
[9]	杨胜玲, 黄兴成, 李渝, 刘彦伶, 张雅蓉, 张艳, 张文安, 蒋太明. 长期有机无机肥配施对水稻生长、干物质积累及产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(9): 1815-1825.
[10]	李旺雄, 张洋, 唐中祺, 郁继华. 平衡施肥对设施基质栽培番茄生长、品质、矿质元素含量与产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(8): 1648-1660.
[11]	邹振浩, 孙业良, 赵玉宝, 李鑫, 张丽平, 张兰, 董春旺, 付建玉, 韩文炎, 颜鹏. 采摘花芽对春茶产量与品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(7): 1369-1376.
[12]	朱诗君, 金树权, 姚红燕, 徐志豪, 罗幼君, 陈若霞. 不同基肥及追肥配比对凤梨生长、产量和品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(6): 1217-1226.
[13]	朱铭, 刘琛, 林义成, 郭彬, 李华, 傅庆林. 不同调理剂组合对浙江红壤土壤肥力、微生物群落多样性和水稻产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(6): 1258-1267.
[14]	叶迎, 赵考诚, 马军, 祝轲, 庄恒扬. 播期和施氮量组合对水稻南粳9108产量和氮素利用的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(5): 879-886.
[15]	胡开博, 杨清夏, 李扬, 吴开贤, 赵平, 龙光强. 化肥减氮配施氨基酸肥料对春玉米生产的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(4): 661-670.