浙江农业学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (11): 2533-2542.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20221657
李虹仪(
), 周润盛, 梁笑玲, 张楚玥, 吕祺欣, 杨长华, 张茂*(
)
收稿日期:2022-11-19
出版日期:2023-11-25
发布日期:2023-12-04
作者简介:李虹仪(1984—),女,广东汕头人,博士,研究方向为动物营养生理与生物化学。E-mail:politician_137@163.com
通讯作者:
* 张茂,E-mail:zm18email@163.com
基金资助:
LI Hongyi(
), ZHOU Runsheng, LIANG Xiaoling, ZHANG Chuyue, LYU Qixin, YANG Changhua, ZHANG Mao*(
)
Received:2022-11-19
Online:2023-11-25
Published:2023-12-04
摘要:
为了研究日粮中钙磷水平对马岗鹅生长性能及肝脏代谢相关基因的影响。试验选用48只体重相近、公母各半的50日龄马岗鹅,随机分为3个组,每组2个重复,每个重复8只,每笼饲养2只。3个组在相同日粮(含钙0.16%、有效磷0.11%)的基础上,分别添加0%、0.15%和0.3%的磷酸氢钙。预饲5 d,试验期28 d,期间记录日采食量,定期采集粪样及血样,测定样品中的钙磷含量。试验结束每组随机抽取8只马岗鹅进行屠宰及肝脏组织样采集,测定其屠宰性能和磷酸化酶活性,转录组测序及荧光定量PCR检测肝脏基因的表达变化。结果表明:对照组试验鹅的采食量高于其他两组(P<0.05),平均日增重、屠宰性能均高于0.15%磷酸氢钙组(P<0.05),而与0.3%磷酸氢钙组无显著差异;3组鹅血钙血磷含量无显著性差异(P>0.05),而粪钙含量随钙磷水平的提高而增加(P<0.05)。转录组测序结果显示,对照组与0.15%磷酸氢钙组之间差异较少,而与0.3%磷酸氢钙组差异较明显,经过分析,差异显著基因较多富集在糖代谢通路,荧光定量PCR结果亦与转录组测序一致,糖代谢相关酶磷酸化酶的活性则随钙磷水平的提高而减少(P<0.05)。日粮中钙磷水平会影响马岗鹅的采食量,同时影响肝脏的糖脂代谢。
中图分类号:
李虹仪, 周润盛, 梁笑玲, 张楚玥, 吕祺欣, 杨长华, 张茂. 日粮钙磷水平对马岗鹅生长性能及肝脏基因表达的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(11): 2533-2542.
LI Hongyi, ZHOU Runsheng, LIANG Xiaoling, ZHANG Chuyue, LYU Qixin, YANG Changhua, ZHANG Mao. Effect of dietary calcium and phosphorus level on Magang geese growth performance and liver gene expression[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(11): 2533-2542.
| 日粮 Dietary | 比例 Proportion/ % | 营养素 Nutrient | 营养水平 Nutritional level |
|---|---|---|---|
| 豆粕 Soybean meal, CP 43% | 4.50 | 代谢能 Metabolic energy/ (MJ·kg-1) | 11.37 |
| 皮大麦 Leather barley | 7.00 | 粗蛋白含量 Crude protein content/% | 10.31 |
| 小麦 Wheat | 10.00 | 粗脂肪含量 Crude fat content/% | 3.28 |
| 碎米 Broken rice | 50.00 | 粗纤维含量 Crude fiber content/% | 7.51 |
| 米糠 Rice bran | 15.00 | 钙含量 Calcium content/% | 0.26 |
| 统糠 Series chaff 预混料Premix | 12.00 1.50 | 有效磷含量 Available phosphorus content/% | 0.24 |
| 合计Total | 100.00 |
表1 基础日粮组成及营养水平
Table 1 Basic diet composition and nutrition level
| 日粮 Dietary | 比例 Proportion/ % | 营养素 Nutrient | 营养水平 Nutritional level |
|---|---|---|---|
| 豆粕 Soybean meal, CP 43% | 4.50 | 代谢能 Metabolic energy/ (MJ·kg-1) | 11.37 |
| 皮大麦 Leather barley | 7.00 | 粗蛋白含量 Crude protein content/% | 10.31 |
| 小麦 Wheat | 10.00 | 粗脂肪含量 Crude fat content/% | 3.28 |
| 碎米 Broken rice | 50.00 | 粗纤维含量 Crude fiber content/% | 7.51 |
| 米糠 Rice bran | 15.00 | 钙含量 Calcium content/% | 0.26 |
| 统糠 Series chaff 预混料Premix | 12.00 1.50 | 有效磷含量 Available phosphorus content/% | 0.24 |
| 合计Total | 100.00 |
图1 日粮不同钙水平下马岗鹅的采食量 同一处理时间不同处理间没有相同字母表示差异显著(P<0.05)。
Fig.1 Feed intake of Magang geese under different dietary calcium levels The data of different treatments on the same treatment day without the same letters indicate the significant difference (P<0.05).
| 处理 Treatment | 平均日增重 Average daily gain/g | 耗料增重比 Feed/gain ratio |
|---|---|---|
| 对照组Control group | 44.64±16.17 a | 6.09±2.56 |
| 0.15%磷酸氢钙组 0.15% calcium hydrogen phosphate addition group | 27.09±6.43 b | 6.33±1.37 |
| 0.3%磷酸氢钙组 0.3% calcium hydrogen phosphate addition group | 34.09±15.72 ab | 6.02±2.89 |
表2 日粮不同钙磷水平下马岗鹅的平均日增重及耗料增重比
Table 2 Average daily gain and feed/gain ratio of Magang geese under different dietary calcium and phosphorus levels
| 处理 Treatment | 平均日增重 Average daily gain/g | 耗料增重比 Feed/gain ratio |
|---|---|---|
| 对照组Control group | 44.64±16.17 a | 6.09±2.56 |
| 0.15%磷酸氢钙组 0.15% calcium hydrogen phosphate addition group | 27.09±6.43 b | 6.33±1.37 |
| 0.3%磷酸氢钙组 0.3% calcium hydrogen phosphate addition group | 34.09±15.72 ab | 6.02±2.89 |
| 处理 Treatment | 宰前活重 Weight | 半净膛重 Semi-eviscerated weight | 全净膛重 Eviscerated weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| 对照组Control group | 7.58±1.03 a | 3.33±0.37 a | 2.88±0.24 a |
| 0.15%磷酸氢钙组 0.15% calcium hydrogen phosphate addition group | 6.29±0.63 b | 2.74±0.17 b | 2.39±0.12 b |
| 0.3%磷酸氢钙组 0.3% calcium hydrogen phosphate addition group | 7.04±0.73 ab | 3.12±0.23 ab | 2.72±0.17 ab |
表3 日粮不同钙磷水平下马岗鹅的屠宰性能
Table 3 Slaughter performance of Magang geese under different dietary calcium and phosphorus levels kg
| 处理 Treatment | 宰前活重 Weight | 半净膛重 Semi-eviscerated weight | 全净膛重 Eviscerated weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| 对照组Control group | 7.58±1.03 a | 3.33±0.37 a | 2.88±0.24 a |
| 0.15%磷酸氢钙组 0.15% calcium hydrogen phosphate addition group | 6.29±0.63 b | 2.74±0.17 b | 2.39±0.12 b |
| 0.3%磷酸氢钙组 0.3% calcium hydrogen phosphate addition group | 7.04±0.73 ab | 3.12±0.23 ab | 2.72±0.17 ab |
| 处理 Treatment | 粪磷含量 Content of calcium in feces | 粪钙含量 Content of phosphorus in feces | 血钙含量 Blood calcium concentration | 血磷含量 Blood phosphorus concentration |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 对照组Control group | 5.48±1.31 | 3.34±1.41 b | 2.92±0.26 | 4.35±1.68 |
| 0.15%磷酸氢钙组 0.15% calcium hydrogen phosphate addition group | 6.13±1.09 | 4.12±1.64 b | 3.10±0.29 | 4.81±1.91 |
| 0.3%磷酸氢钙组 0.3% calcium hydrogen phosphate addition group | 5.10±1.85 | 7.23±3.58 a | 3.13±0.28 | 4.33±1.08 |
表4 日粮不同钙磷水平下马岗鹅血液及粪便中钙磷的含量
Table 4 Calcium and phosphorus levels in blood and feces of Magang geese under different dietary calcium and phosphorus levels mmol·L-1
| 处理 Treatment | 粪磷含量 Content of calcium in feces | 粪钙含量 Content of phosphorus in feces | 血钙含量 Blood calcium concentration | 血磷含量 Blood phosphorus concentration |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 对照组Control group | 5.48±1.31 | 3.34±1.41 b | 2.92±0.26 | 4.35±1.68 |
| 0.15%磷酸氢钙组 0.15% calcium hydrogen phosphate addition group | 6.13±1.09 | 4.12±1.64 b | 3.10±0.29 | 4.81±1.91 |
| 0.3%磷酸氢钙组 0.3% calcium hydrogen phosphate addition group | 5.10±1.85 | 7.23±3.58 a | 3.13±0.28 | 4.33±1.08 |
图2 不同处理组间马岗鹅肝脏差异基因表达数量 L表示对照组,M表示0.15%磷酸氢钙组,H表示0.3%磷酸氢钙组,下同。
Fig.2 Number of differential gene expression in goose liver among different treatment groups L represents the control group, M represents the 0.15% calcium hydrogen phosphate addition group, and H represents the 0.3% calcium hydrogen phosphate addition group. The same as below.
图4 差异基因富集通路图 A,0.3%磷酸氢钙组表达显著高于对照组基因所富集通路;B,0.3%磷酸氢钙组表达显著低于对照组基因所富集通路。
Fig.4 Enrichment pathway of differential genes A, Enrichment pathway of differential genes in the 0.3% calcium hydrogen phosphate addition group significantly higher than those in the control group; B, Enrichment pathway of differential genes in the 0.3% calcium hydrogen phosphate addition group significantly lower than those in the control group.
图5 0.3%磷酸氢钙组与对照组间前8个差异基因表达量 A,0.3%磷酸氢钙组表达显著高于对照组前8个基因的荧光定量PCR检测结果;B,0.3%磷酸氢钙组表达显著低于对照组前8个基因的荧光定量PCR检测结果。*、**分别表示与对照相比差异达显著(P<0.05)、极显著(P<0.01)水平。
Fig.5 Top 8 differential gene expressions between 0.3% calcium hydrogen addition group and control group A, Top 8 differential genes in the 0.3% calcium hydrogen addition group significantly higher than those in the control group; B, Top 8 differential genes in the 0.3% calcium hydrogen addition group significantly lower than those in the control group. *, ** indicates the significant difference at the level of 0.05 or 0.01.
| 处理 Treatment | 肝脏中GP活性 GP activity in liver/ (ng·mL-1·g-1) |
|---|---|
| 对照组Control group | 33.03±7.19 a |
| 0.15%磷酸氢钙组 0.15% calcium hydrogen phosphate addition group | 24.13±3.97 b |
| 0.3%磷酸氢钙组 0.3% calcium hydrogen phosphate addition group | 20.32±1.72 b |
表5 日粮不同钙磷水平下马岗鹅肝脏中GP活性
Table 5 GP activity in liver of Magang geese under different dietary calcium and phosphorus levels
| 处理 Treatment | 肝脏中GP活性 GP activity in liver/ (ng·mL-1·g-1) |
|---|---|
| 对照组Control group | 33.03±7.19 a |
| 0.15%磷酸氢钙组 0.15% calcium hydrogen phosphate addition group | 24.13±3.97 b |
| 0.3%磷酸氢钙组 0.3% calcium hydrogen phosphate addition group | 20.32±1.72 b |
| [1] | WANG Y B, WANG W W, ZHANG S, et al. Recommended levels of calcium and non-phytate phosphorus for yellow-feathered broilers (finisher phase)[J]. Animal Bioscience, 2022, 35(12): 1940-1947. |
| [2] | KOP-BOZBAY C, AKDAG A, ATAN H L, et al. Body weight of young broilers fed with declining calcium and phosphorus contents during the starter period is irresponsive to changes in the skeleton[J]. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 2021, 105(4): 747-756. |
| [3] | HAN J C, WANG X N, WU L H, et al. Dietary calcium levels regulate calcium transporter gene expression levels in the small intestine of broiler chickens[J]. British Poultry Science, 2022, 63(2): 202-210. |
| [4] | 李园园, 习雪勇, 张源生, 等. 低聚糖、酵母钙对霍尔多巴吉鹅的生长性能、体尺指标、屠宰性能和肌肉品质的影响[J]. 饲料工业, 2021, 42(23): 31-36. |
| LI Y Y, Ⅺ X Y, ZHANG Y S, et al. Effects of oligosaccharides and yeast calcium on growth performance, body size index, slaughter performance and muscle quality of haldobuji geese[J]. Feed Industry, 2021, 42(23): 31-36. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [5] | ALAGAWANY M, ABD EL-HACK M E, ASHOUR E A, et al. Consequences of varying dietary calcium and phosphorus levels on lipid profile, antioxidant and immunity parameters of growing Egyptian geese[J]. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 2020, 19(1): 1490-1497. |
| [6] | ALAGAWANY M, ALI ASHOUR E, EL-KHOLY M S, et al. Effect of dietary calcium and phosphorus levels on growth, carcass characteristics and liver and kidney functions of growing Egyptian geese[J]. Poultry Science, 2021, 100(8): 101244. |
| [7] | 宿国强. 不同钙和蛋白质水平饲粮对雏鹅生长性能及肠、肾结构与功能的影响研究[D]. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2022: 94. |
| SU G Q. Effects of different calcium and protein levels on growth performance, intestinal and renal structure and function of goslings[D]. Yangzhou: Yangzhou University, 2022: 94. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [8] | 奚雨萌, 闫俊书, 应诗家, 等. 高蛋白质高钙饲粮对雏鹅内脏型痛风发生、肾脏功能及肠道微生物区系的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2019, 31(2): 612-621. |
| Ⅺ Y M, YAN J S, YING S J, et al. Effects of high protein and calcium diets on visceral gout development, kidney function and intestinal microbial community of goslings[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2019, 31(2): 612-621. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [9] | REYER H, OSTER M, PONSUKSILI S, et al. Transcriptional responses in jejunum of two layer chicken strains following variations in dietary calcium and phosphorus levels[J]. BMC Genomics, 2021, 22(1): 485. |
| [10] | KIM D, LANGMEAD B, SALZBERG S L. HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements[J]. Nature Methods, 2015, 12(4): 357-360. |
| [11] | LI B, DEWEY C N. RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome[J]. BMC Bioinformatics, 2011, 12: 323. |
| [12] | LOVE M I, HUBER W, ANDERS S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2[J]. Genome Biology, 2014, 15(12): 550. |
| [13] | 孙巍, 贾禄, 孙会, 等. 不同钙水平日粮对鹅肉品质的影响[J]. 饲料工业, 2010, 31(9): 16-18. |
| SUN W, JIA L, SUN H, et al. Effects of different calcium levels on goose meat quality[J]. Feed Industry, 2010, 31(9): 16-18. (in Chinese) | |
| [14] | 罗旭, 张爱忠, 姜宁, 等. 日粮纤维水平对不同生长阶段籽鹅屠宰性能和血液生化指标的影响[J]. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2017(21): 144-148. |
| LUO X, ZHANG A Z, JIANG N, et al. Effects of dietary fiber level on slaughter performance and blood biochemical indexes of goose at different growth stages[J]. Heilongjiang Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, 2017(21): 144-148. (in Chinese) | |
| [15] | 王宗伟, 牟晓玲, 杨国伟, 等. 日粮营养水平对肉鹅血清钙磷、碱性磷酸酶及胫骨钙磷的影响[J]. 中国家禽, 2009, 31(15): 16-20. |
| WANG Z W, MOU X L, YANG G W, et al. Effects of dietary nutritional levels on calcium, phosphorus concentrations and ALK activity in serum and calcium, phosphorus contents in Tibia for geese[J]. China Poultry, 2009, 31(15): 16-20. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [16] | 郝艳霜, 冯焯, 赵国先, 等. 日粮钙磷水平对育成期坝上长尾鸡生长性能和血液生化指标的影响[J]. 粮食与饲料工业, 2018(3): 47-50. |
| HAO Y S, FENG Z, ZHAO G X, et al. Effects of dietary calcium and phosphorus levels on growth performance and blood biochemical indexes of the Bashang long-tailed chickens in rearing period[J]. Cereal & Feed Industry, 2018(3): 47-50. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [17] | 陈冬梅. 植酸酶和柠檬酸对肉鸡生产性能及钙、磷利用率的影响[J]. 饲料工业, 2003, 24(1): 22-24. |
| CHEN D M. Effects of phytase and citric acid on performance and utilization ratio of calcium and phosphorus in broilers[J]. Feed Industry, 2003, 24(1): 22-24. (in Chinese) | |
| [18] | 胡顺勇, 胡胜超, 郭均友, 等. 浅谈动物机体微量元素钙和磷的作用机理[J]. 山东畜牧兽医, 2020, 41(11): 76-77. |
| HU S Y, HU S C, GUO J Y, et al. Discussion on the action mechanism of trace elements calcium and phosphorus in animal body[J]. Shandong Journal of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, 2020, 41(11): 76-77. (in Chinese) | |
| [19] | STATHI A, MAMAIS M, CHRYSINA E D, et al. Anomeric spironucleosides of β-d-glucopyranosyl uracil as potential inhibitors of glycogen phosphorylase[J]. Molecules, 2019, 24(12): 2327. |
| [20] | AGIUS L. Role of glycogen phosphorylase in liver glycogen metabolism[J]. Molecular Aspects of Medicine, 2015, 46: 34-45. |
| [21] | ZOIS CHRISTOS E, HENDRIKS ANNE M, SYED H, et al. Liver glycogen phosphorylase is upregulated in glioblastoma and provides a metabolic vulnerability to high dose radiation[J]. Cell Death & Disease, 2022, 13(6): 573. |
| [1] | 张均, 张博, 胡碧博, 刘京亮, 张晓宇, 李春阳, 熊盛婷, 郭彬彬, 王秀存, 马超. 小麦SWEET和SUT家族基因鉴定与表达分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(9): 1825-1839. |
| [2] | 张若楠, 门小明, 秦凯鹏, 王彬彬, 吴杰, 丁向彬, 徐子伟, 齐珂珂. 绿嘉黑猪的不同杂交组合生长性能、胴体品质、产肉性能和收益比较研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(6): 1203-1211. |
| [3] | 陶鹏, 丁小雅, 岳智臣, 赵彦婷, 雷娟利, 胡齐赞, 臧运祥, 李必元. 南瓜果胶含量的全基因组关联分析与候选基因预测[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(6): 1244-1251. |
| [4] | 杜颂, 汤涛, 程曦, 赵学平, 张春荣, 梁晓宇, 王萌, 张震, 李永成, 章程辉. 砜吡草唑及其主要代谢物在土壤中的消解和对土壤酶活性的影响研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(4): 847-857. |
| [5] | 吴佳奇, 朱学明, 鲍坚东, 王操屹, 周肖瑜, 李琳, 林福呈. 稻瘟病生物防治研究进展[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(3): 736-744. |
| [6] | 黄浩, 汤涛, 许振岚, 赵学平. 吡唑醚菌酯对铁皮石斛中多糖和黄酮的影响研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(1): 115-125. |
| [7] | 展梦琪, 苏傲雪, 侯倩, 张皓宇, 姜欣蕊, 徐艳. 水稻对林丹的吸收累积与代谢组学研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(9): 2110-2121. |
| [8] | 李飞, 苏甜甜, 苏康杰, 徐可, 马力, 刘子明. 螺旋藻和红球藻对斑马鱼生长性能、抗氧化酶、磷酸酶和热休克蛋白的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(7): 1511-1518. |
| [9] | 曾洪学, 屈兴红. 低温胁迫对3份葛种质萌发过程中脯氨酸和抗坏血酸-谷胱甘肽循环代谢的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(7): 1558-1568. |
| [10] | 何昌熙, 郑建波, 马建波, 贾永义, 刘士力, 蒋文枰, 迟美丽, 程顺, 李飞. 翘嘴鲌Runx2b基因的克隆与表达特征分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(5): 1024-1031. |
| [11] | 李亚萍, 金福来, 黄宗贵, 张涛, 段晓婧, 姜武, 陶正明, 陈家栋. 铁皮石斛糖苷水解酶GH3基因家族鉴定及表达模式分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(4): 790-799. |
| [12] | 秦凯鹏, 门小明, 徐子伟. 猪肉鲜味物质及其形成机理研究进展[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(3): 719-728. |
| [13] | 彭佳诚, 吴越, 徐洁皓, 夏美文, 齐天鹏, 徐海圣. 日本沼虾桩蛋白基因的克隆与镉胁迫对其表达的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(2): 247-253. |
| [14] | 虎丽霞, 张婧, 高彦强, 毛尔晔, 韩康宁, 杨滟, 颉建明. 长时间镁胁迫对芹菜叶绿素荧光特性与抗氧化能力的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(2): 295-307. |
| [15] | 刘筱琳, 孙婷婷, 杨捷, 何恒斌. 天香百合、药百合黄酮醇合成酶FLS基因克隆和表达分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(2): 344-357. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||