二十二份毛花猕猴桃种质资源果实品质的主成分分析与综合评价

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2021.05.07

浙江农业学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (5): 825-830.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2021.05.07

二十二份毛花猕猴桃种质资源果实品质的主成分分析与综合评价

王英珍(), 潘芝梅^*()

丽水职业技术学院,浙江丽水 323000

收稿日期:2020-07-20 出版日期:2021-05-25 发布日期:2021-05-25
作者简介:*潘芝梅,E-mail:1148642563@qq.com
王英珍(1991—),男,河南南阳人,硕士研究生,助教,主要从事果树栽培生理方面的研究工作。E-mail:wangyingzhen91@163.com
通讯作者: 潘芝梅
基金资助:
浙江省教育厅一般科研项目(Y201942800);丽水市科技计划项目(2014XPZ09)

Comprehensive evaluation of 22 Actinidia eriantha germplasm resources based on principal components analysis

WANG Yingzhen(), PAN Zhimei^*()

Lishui Vocational and Technical College, Lishui 323000, China

Received:2020-07-20 Online:2021-05-25 Published:2021-05-25
Contact: PAN Zhimei

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为了更好地了解毛花猕猴桃种质资源的多样性,测定了浙江省丽水市境内22份毛花猕猴桃种质的8个品质指标,进行了变异分析、主成分分析、聚类分析和综合评价。结果表明,果实品质指标差异较大,单果质量的变异系数最大(38%);果实横径的变异系数最小(11%);聚类分析结果表明,22份毛花猕猴桃种质可以分为两大类,其中第一类种质果实的可溶性固形物含量、可滴定酸含量、维生素C含量均高于第二类,第二类种质果实的固酸比稍高于第一类;主成分分析表明,前三个主成分贡献率达85.04%,可综合反映果实品质信息;综合评价结果显示,LD-18、L-74、L-27、L-19、L-73这5个单株果实综合性状表现优良。综上所述,丽水市境内毛花猕猴桃种质资源果实性状具有丰富的多样性,为新品种的选育和果实品质改良提供了重要的参考依据。

关键词: 毛花猕猴桃, 果实品质, 变异系数, 主成分分析, 聚类分析

Abstract:

Mao Hua kiwifruit (Actinidia eriantha) is a special germplasm resource in China, which has rich nutrition and high utilization value. In order to analyze the diversity of Actinidia eriantha germplasm resources, 8 fruit traits of 22 Actinidia eriantha which were obtained from Lishui City, Zhejiang Province were evaluated. The variation analysis, clustering analysis, principal component analysis and comprehensive evaluation were employed to evaluate the overall quality of Actinidia eriantha. The results showed that there were significant difference among the variable coefficient fruit quality. The variable coefficient of fruit weight was the lagrest (38%), and the variable coefficient of fruit width was the least(11%). Clustering analysis results showed that 22 Mao Hua kiwifruit germplasms were divided into two groups. The soluble solids content, titratable acid content and vitamin C content in group Ⅰ were superior to group Ⅱ; the ratio of soluble solids content and titratable acid content in groupⅡ was superior to group Ⅰ. Principal component analysis showed that the accumulative variance contribution rate of three principle components extracted from six quality characters reached 85.04%, illustrating that the three principal components reflected the most parts of the original variables. The comprehensive assessment results showed that LD-18, L-74, L-27, L-19, L-73 were excellent in comprehensive performance. In conclusion, There were significant differences among different Mao Hua kiwifruit germplasm in Lishui City, Zhejiang Province. Through this evaluation, Mao Hua kiwi furit germplasm resources with high nutritional value and good flavor and taste can be selected conveniently. At the same time, the comprehensive evaluation model provides a reliable reference for selections of high-quality breeding materials.

Key words: Actinidia eriantha, fruit quality, variable coefficient, principal component analysis, clustering analysis

中图分类号:

S663.4

王英珍, 潘芝梅. 二十二份毛花猕猴桃种质资源果实品质的主成分分析与综合评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(5): 825-830.

WANG Yingzhen, PAN Zhimei. Comprehensive evaluation of 22 Actinidia eriantha germplasm resources based on principal components analysis[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(5): 825-830.

图/表 6

参考文献 19

[1]	钟敏, 陶俊杰, 黄春辉, 等. 江西野生毛花猕猴桃群体SSR遗传多样性研究[J]. 核农学报, 2019,33(5):863-869.
	ZHONG M, TAO J J, HUANG C H, et al. Analysis of genetic diversity of populations in Actinidia eriantha Benth. based on simple sequence repeat(SSR) markers[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2019,33(5):863-869.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]	钟彩虹, 张鹏, 姜正旺, 等. 中华猕猴桃和毛花猕猴桃果实碳水化合物及维生素C的动态变化研究[J]. 植物科学学报, 2011,29(3):370-376.
	ZHONG C H, ZHANG P, JIANG Z W, et al. Dynamic changes of carbohydrate and vitamin C in fruits of Actinidia chinensis and A. eriantha during growing season[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2011,29(3):370-376.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]	朱波, 华金渭, 吉庆勇, 等. 毛花猕猴桃生物学特性与优良株系初选[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2013,54(1):32-34.
	ZHU B, HUA J W, JI Q Y, et al. Biological characteristics of Actinidia eriantha Benth and selective breeding on its elite plant strain[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2013,54(1):32-34. (in Chinese)
[4]	戚雯烨, 周晨卉, 宋丽君, 等. 毛花猕猴桃‘华特’果实采后糖代谢研究[J]. 果树学报, 2016,33(6):744-751.
	QI W Y, ZHOU C H, SONG L J, et al. Study on sugar metabolism of Actindia eriantha Benth. 'White’ during storage[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2016,33(6):744-751.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]	刘科鹏, 黄春辉, 冷建华, 等. ‘金魁’猕猴桃果实品质的主成分分析与综合评价[J]. 果树学报, 2012,29(5):867-871.
	LIU K P, HUANG C H, LENG J H, et al. Principal component analysis and comprehensive evaluation of the fruit quality of ‘Jinkui’ kiwifruit[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2012,29(5):867-871.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]	谢鸣, 吴延军, 蒋桂华, 等. 大果毛花猕猴桃新品种‘华特’[J]. 园艺学报, 2008,35(10):1555.
	XIE M, WU Y J, JIANG G H, et al. A new big fruit Actinidia eriantha Benth. cultivar‘white’[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2008,35(10):1555.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]	张慧琴, 谢鸣, 张庆朝, 等. 毛花猕猴桃新品种‘玉玲珑’[J]. 园艺学报, 2015,42(增刊2):2841-2842.
	ZHANG H Q, XIE M, ZHANG Q C, et al. A new Actinidia eriantha cultivar ‘Yulinglong’[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2015,42(S2):2841-2842. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	徐小彪, 黄春辉, 曲雪艳, 等. 毛花猕猴桃新品种‘赣猕6号’[J]. 园艺学报, 2015,42(12):2539-2540.
	XU X B, HUANG C H, QU X Y, et al. A new easy peeling Actinidia eriantha cultivar‘Ganmi 6’[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2015,42(12):2539-2540.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	王力荣, 朱更瑞, 方伟超. 桃种质资源若干植物学数量性状描述指标探讨[J]. 中国农业科学, 2005,38(4):770-776.
	WANG L R, ZHU G R, FANG W C. The evaluating criteria of some botanical quantitative characters of peach genetic resources[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2005,38(4):770-776.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]	郎彬彬, 朱博, 谢敏, 等. 野生毛花猕猴桃种质资源主要数量性状变异分析及评价指标探讨[J]. 果树学报, 2016,33(1):8-15.
	LANG B B, ZHU B, XIE M, et al. Variation and probability grading of the main quantitative characteristics of wild Actinidia eriantha germplasm resources[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2016,33(1):8-15.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]	王斌, 赵利, 王利民, 等. 胡麻种质资源主要品质性状的分析与评价[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2018,40(6):785-792.
	WANG B, ZHAO L, WANG L M, et al. Main quality traits analysis and evaluation of oil flax germplasms[J]. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 2018,40(6):785-792.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]	宋慧, 任锡亮, 张香琴. 芥菜种质资源分子聚类分析[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2019,60(2):226-228.
	SONG H, REN X L, ZHANG X Q. Molecular cluster analysis of mustard germplasm resources[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2019,60(2):226-228. (in Chinese)
[13]	唐启义, 冯明光. DPS数据处理系统: 实验设计、统计分析及数据挖掘[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2007.
[14]	蒋卉, 丁慧萍, 白红进. 新疆南疆引进鲜食枣品种品质性状的综合评价[J]. 食品科学, 2016,37(3):55-59.
	JIANG H, DING H P, BAI H J. Comprehensive assessment of quality characteristics of introduced table jujube cultivars in southern Xinjiang[J]. Food Science, 2016,37(3):55-59.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]	李伟, 郜海燕, 陈杭君, 等. 基于主成分分析的不同品种杨梅果实综合品质评价[J]. 中国食品学报, 2017,17(6):161-171.
	LI W, GAO H Y, CHEN H J, et al. Evaluation of comprehensive quality of different varieties of bayberry based on principal components analysis[J]. Journal of Chinese Institute of Food Science and Technology, 2017,17(6):161-171.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]	赵滢, 杨义明, 范书田, 等. 基于主成分分析的山葡萄果实品质评价研究[J]. 吉林农业大学学报, 2014,36(5):575-581.
	ZHAO Y, YANG Y M, FAN S T, et al. Evaluation on the fruit quality of Amur grape(Vitis amurensis Rupr.) base on principal component analysis[J]. Journal of Jilin Agricultural University, 2014,36(5):575-581.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]	秦红艳, 许培磊, 艾军, 等. 软枣猕猴桃种质资源果实品质、表型性状多样性及主成分分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2015,31(1):160-165.
	QIN H Y, XU P L, AI J, et al. Diversity of fruit quality and phenotypic traits of Actinidia arguta Planch germplasm resources and their principal component analysis[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2015,31(1):160-165.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]	赵海娟, 刘威生, 刘宁, 等. 普通杏(Prunus armeniaca)种质资源数量性状的遗传多样性分析[J]. 果树学报, 2014,31(1):20-29.
	ZHAO H J, LIU W S, LIU N, et al. Genetic diversity analysis for the quantitative traits of common apricot(Prunus armeniaca)germplasm[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2014,31(1):20-29.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]	曲雪艳, 郎彬彬, 钟敏, 等. 野生毛花猕猴桃果实品质主成分分析及综合评价[J]. 中国农学通报, 2016,32(1):92-96.
	QU X Y, LANG B B, ZHONG M, et al. Principal component analysis and comprehensive evaluation of fruit quality of Actinidia eriantha[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2016,32(1):92-96.(in Chinese with English abstract)

编号 Code	单果质量 Fruit weight/g	果实纵径 Fruit length/cm	果实横径 Fruit width/cm	果形指数 Fruit shape index	可溶性固形物含量 Soluble solids content/%	可滴定酸度含量 Titratable acid content/%	固酸比 SSC/TAC	维生素C含量 Vitamin C content/ (mg·kg^-1)
63	18.84	4.52	2.60	1.74	7.23	0.83	8.76	3 478.4
L-14	19.07	4.37	2.73	1.60	14.90	1.62	9.17	6 956.8
L-16	14.01	4.59	2.57	1.78	9.47	1.32	7.19	6 000.2
L-19	21.18	5.00	2.92	1.71	14.87	1.22	12.21	7 826.4
L-21	17.60	3.08	2.67	1.16	12.63	1.27	9.92	4 869.8
L-27	26.59	6.01	2.73	2.20	13.90	1.06	13.06	6 000.2
L-3	25.40	4.83	2.86	1.69	8.93	1.27	7.01	5 565.4
L-36	12.66	3.44	1.85	1.86	13.00	1.54	8.44	7 043.8
L-40	16.33	4.45	2.50	1.78	13.07	1.85	7.07	5 565.4
L-41	19.88	5.67	2.38	2.38	12.87	1.50	8.59	4 695.8
L-44	12.83	4.03	2.14	1.88	12.55	1.30	9.64	6 261.1
L-47	17.96	4.62	2.22	2.08	12.13	1.68	7.22	4 000.2
L-67	17.15	4.59	2.50	1.84	13.10	1.27	10.28	3 391.4
L-73	15.95	4.87	2.73	1.78	15.17	1.30	11.65	9 826.5
L-74	19.51	4.50	2.71	1.66	12.87	0.76	17.02	4 782.8
L-79	12.28	2.94	2.21	1.33	10.57	1.13	9.32	3 043.6
L-80	13.43	2.97	2.60	1.14	7.93	0.81	9.77	4 608.9
L-83	17.16	4.91	2.64	1.86	13.00	1.16	11.19	6 000.2
LD-18	23.48	5.05	2.03	2.49	19.43	1.37	14.16	6 348.1
LD-20	17.26	4.14	2.83	1.46	11.77	0.83	14.25	4 521.9
W-2	16.62	4.19	2.56	1.63	10.67	1.29	8.28	3 391.4
W-1	21.09	5.88	2.48	2.37	12.50	1.18	10.63	5 565.4

编号 Code	单果质量 Fruit weight/g	果实纵径 Fruit length/cm	果实横径 Fruit width/cm	果形指数 Fruit shape index	可溶性固形物含量 Soluble solids content/%	可滴定酸度含量 Titratable acid content/%	固酸比 SSC/TAC	维生素C含量 Vitamin C content/ (mg·kg^-1)
63	18.84	4.52	2.60	1.74	7.23	0.83	8.76	3 478.4
L-14	19.07	4.37	2.73	1.60	14.90	1.62	9.17	6 956.8
L-16	14.01	4.59	2.57	1.78	9.47	1.32	7.19	6 000.2
L-19	21.18	5.00	2.92	1.71	14.87	1.22	12.21	7 826.4
L-21	17.60	3.08	2.67	1.16	12.63	1.27	9.92	4 869.8
L-27	26.59	6.01	2.73	2.20	13.90	1.06	13.06	6 000.2
L-3	25.40	4.83	2.86	1.69	8.93	1.27	7.01	5 565.4
L-36	12.66	3.44	1.85	1.86	13.00	1.54	8.44	7 043.8
L-40	16.33	4.45	2.50	1.78	13.07	1.85	7.07	5 565.4
L-41	19.88	5.67	2.38	2.38	12.87	1.50	8.59	4 695.8
L-44	12.83	4.03	2.14	1.88	12.55	1.30	9.64	6 261.1
L-47	17.96	4.62	2.22	2.08	12.13	1.68	7.22	4 000.2
L-67	17.15	4.59	2.50	1.84	13.10	1.27	10.28	3 391.4
L-73	15.95	4.87	2.73	1.78	15.17	1.30	11.65	9 826.5
L-74	19.51	4.50	2.71	1.66	12.87	0.76	17.02	4 782.8
L-79	12.28	2.94	2.21	1.33	10.57	1.13	9.32	3 043.6
L-80	13.43	2.97	2.60	1.14	7.93	0.81	9.77	4 608.9
L-83	17.16	4.91	2.64	1.86	13.00	1.16	11.19	6 000.2
LD-18	23.48	5.05	2.03	2.49	19.43	1.37	14.16	6 348.1
LD-20	17.26	4.14	2.83	1.46	11.77	0.83	14.25	4 521.9
W-2	16.62	4.19	2.56	1.63	10.67	1.29	8.28	3 391.4
W-1	21.09	5.88	2.48	2.37	12.50	1.18	10.63	5 565.4

指标Index	最大值Max	最小值Min	平均值Mean	标准差S	变异系数CV/%
单果质量Fruit weight/g	26.59	12.28	19.34	3.91	38
纵径Fruit length/cm	6.01	2.94	4.48	0.84	19
横径Fruit width/cm	2.92	1.85	2.52	0.28	11
果形指数Fruit shape index	2.49	1.14	1.79	0.36	20
维生素C Vitamin C content/(mg·kg^-1)	9 826.5	3 043.6	5 442.9	1 621.3	30
可滴定酸度Titratable acid content/%	1.85	0.76	1.25	0.29	23
可溶性固形物含量Soluble solids content/%	19.43	7.23	12.39	2.65	21
固酸比SSC/TA	17.02	7.01	10.22	2.63	26

指标Index	最大值Max	最小值Min	平均值Mean	标准差S	变异系数CV/%
单果质量Fruit weight/g	26.59	12.28	19.34	3.91	38
纵径Fruit length/cm	6.01	2.94	4.48	0.84	19
横径Fruit width/cm	2.92	1.85	2.52	0.28	11
果形指数Fruit shape index	2.49	1.14	1.79	0.36	20
维生素C Vitamin C content/(mg·kg^-1)	9 826.5	3 043.6	5 442.9	1 621.3	30
可滴定酸度Titratable acid content/%	1.85	0.76	1.25	0.29	23
可溶性固形物含量Soluble solids content/%	19.43	7.23	12.39	2.65	21
固酸比SSC/TA	17.02	7.01	10.22	2.63	26

分类 Group	单果质量 Fruit weight/g	果实纵径 Fruit length/cm	横径 Fruit width/cm	果形指数 Fruit shape index	可溶性固形物含量 Soluble solids content/%	可滴定酸度含量 Titratable acid content/%	固酸比 SSC/TA	维生素C含量 Vitamin C content/ (mg·kg^-1)
Ⅰ	18.83	4.84	2.48	1.96	13.27	1.38	9.80	6 261.1
Ⅱ	16.58	3.87	2.59	1.49	10.85	1.02	10.95	4 011.0

二十二份毛花猕猴桃种质资源果实品质的主成分分析与综合评价

Comprehensive evaluation of 22 Actinidia eriantha germplasm resources based on principal components analysis

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 19

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

主成分Principal component	Z₁	Z₂	Z₃	Z₄	Z₅	Z₆
可溶性固形物含量Soluble solids content	0.27	-0.03	0.29	-0.31	-0.61	3.40
单果质量Fruit weight	0.36	0.17	-0.58	0.86	-0.50	-0.05
维生素C含量Vitamin C content	0.21	-0.08	0.56	0.72	0.72	-0.30
可滴定酸度含量Titratable acid content	-0.12	0.55	-0.07	0.05	0.73	3.32
固酸比SSC/TA	0.21	0.48	0.30	-0.43	-0.28	-3.56
果形指数Fruit shape index	0.37	-0.15	-0.37	-0.68	0.99	-0.19
特征值Eigenvalue	0.15	0.12	0.07	0.03	0.02	0.00
贡献率Contribution rate/%	37.99	29.77	17.28	8.55	5.97	0.44
累积贡献率Accumulated contribution rate/%	37.99	67.76	85.04	93.59	99.56	100.00

编号 Code	F₁	F₂	F₃	F_综合	排序 Ranking
LD-18	1.114 6	0.498 1	-0.269 1	0.525 2	1
L-74	0.583 7	1.028 0	-0.195 1	0.494 0	2
L-27	0.923 4	0.689 1	-0.498 5	0.469 8	3
L-19	0.733 1	0.533 6	0.032 9	0.443 0	4
L-73	0.689 1	0.368 1	0.401 8	0.440 8	5
LD-20	0.392 8	0.859 3	-0.103 2	0.387 2	6
W-1	0.751 9	0.439 0	-0.391 7	0.348 6	7
L-83	0.547 6	0.475 5	-0.044 7	0.341 9	8
L-14	0.604 8	0.180 5	0.095 5	0.300 0	9
L-44	0.428 1	0.273 5	0.139 6	0.268 2	10
L-21	0.307 0	0.456 2	0.030 4	0.257 7	11
L-67	0.454 5	0.410 0	-0.245 9	0.252 2	12
L-41	0.699 9	0.171 8	-0.394 9	0.248 7	13
L-36	0.454 9	0.085 0	0.238 2	0.239 3	14
L-3	0.529 3	0.352 4	-0.469 8	0.224 8	15
L-80	0.033 9	0.649 2	0.041 3	0.213 3	16
63	0.262 3	0.608 4	-0.451 7	0.202 7	17
L-16	0.306 2	0.185 0	0.017 3	0.174 4	18
W-2	0.292 9	0.328 9	-0.232 2	0.169 0	19
L-40	0.485 2	-0.065 2	0.006 4	0.166 0	20
L-79	0.091 8	0.442 6	-0.010 8	0.164 8	21
L-47	0.523 2	0.035 0	-0.302 3	0.156 9	22

[1]	许卫猛, 徐妍, 陈国立. 基于多种分析方法的糯玉米品质综合评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(9): 1840-1848.
[2]	刘国敏, 郑虚, 廖玉娇, 覃叶欣, 覃维治. 嫁接对低温胁迫下马铃薯苗抗寒性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(8): 1615-1623.
[3]	曹永庆, 姚小华, 王开良, 任华东. 普通油茶主要性状的年际稳定性[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(8): 1624-1633.
[4]	贺世雄, 杨蕾, 齐安民, 程籍, 王敏, 李英奎, 洪林. 中间砧对3种杂柑叶片光合特性、理化指标和果实品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(8): 1680-1693.
[5]	张顺昌, 徐继根, 符成悦, 蒲占湑, 胡丽鹏, 吴昊, 李俊兵, 辛亮, 雷元军. 喷施氨基酸钙对红美人杂柑果皮龟裂与品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(8): 1706-1715.
[6]	王呈阳, 刘洁雅, 吴敏怡, 谢博伊, 洪德成, 冷锋, 吴国泉. 钙处理对涝害下寒香蜜葡萄果实品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(7): 1451-1458.
[7]	谈亚丽, 高梦祥, 李晓洁, 周英杰, 熊健, 曾子琦, 李啸, 杨华. 湖北省主栽核桃在不同采收期的品质[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(7): 1459-1468.
[8]	江振蓝, 陈付勋, 罗双飞, 罗烨琴, 沙晋明. 基于多光谱变换和主成分分析的土壤全铁含量随机森林模型反演[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(7): 1521-1532.
[9]	项缨, 丛建民, 潘丹红, 陶永刚. 春大棚有机种植不同品种番茄的生育进程分析和综合评价研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(6): 1252-1261.
[10]	岳丽, 庄红梅, 祖力皮牙·买买提, 王佳敏, 毛红艳, 张英仙, 尼格尔热依·亚迪卡尔, 于明. 基于主成分分析与聚类分析的芜菁肉质根质地品质综合评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(5): 1057-1071.
[11]	刘思彤, 侯宇, 潘家荃, 周桦楠, 崔亮, 万博, 于涛. 甘薯对低温胁迫的生理响应及耐寒性评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(4): 767-778.
[12]	王丽, 陈立明, 王鹏飞, 张彬, 穆霄鹏. 有机肥配施菌肥对欧李果实品质和土壤性质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(4): 820-830.
[13]	谈静如, 胡齐赞, 岳智臣, 陶鹏, 雷娟利, 李必元, 赵彦婷, 臧运祥. 基于叶绿素荧光参数的苗用型大白菜耐热性综合评价体系[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(2): 288-299.
[14]	郭赛赛, 聂智星, 傅鸿妃, 王同林, 邵志勇, 王宏, 郑积荣. 37份辣椒种质资源的表型性状及SRAP遗传多样性分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(2): 300-310.
[15]	潘志洪, 温雪婷, 杨华, 吕文涛, 张俊杰, 肖英平. 番鸭肌肉氨基酸谱发育性变化研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(9): 2010-2019.