种养废弃物堆肥对日光温室西葫芦养分利用和土壤性质的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2023.06.20

浙江农业学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (6): 1427-1439.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2023.06.20

种养废弃物堆肥对日光温室西葫芦养分利用和土壤性质的影响

铁建中¹(), 刘亚昱¹, 高雪琴¹, 徐之奇¹, 胡琳莉¹^,²^,^*(), 郁继华¹^,²

1.甘肃农业大学园艺学院,甘肃兰州 730070
2.省部共建干旱生境作物学国家重点实验室,甘肃兰州 730070

收稿日期:2022-08-09 出版日期:2023-06-25 发布日期:2023-07-04
作者简介:铁建中(1999—),男,甘肃永登人,硕士研究生,研究方向为蔬菜栽培生理生态。E-mail:282716038@qq.com
通讯作者: *胡琳莉,E-mail:hull@gsau.edu.cn
基金资助:
甘肃省教育厅“双一流”重点科研项目(GSSYLXM-02);国家大宗蔬菜产业技术体系(CARS-23-C-07);甘肃省拔尖领军人才培养计划(GSBJLJ-2021-14);现代丝路寒旱农业科技支撑项目(GSLK-2021-6)

Effects of planting and breeding waste composting on nutrient utilization and soil properties of zucchini in greenhouse

TIE Jianzhong¹(), LIU Yayu¹, GAO Xueqin¹, XU Zhiqi¹, HU Linli¹^,²^,^*(), YU Jihua¹^,²

1. College of Horticulture, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China
2. State Key Laboratory of Arid Land Crop Science, Lanzhou 730070, China

Received:2022-08-09 Online:2023-06-25 Published:2023-07-04

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

针对日光温室蔬菜栽培过量施用化肥和西北地区种养废弃物产生量大的问题,以羊粪、尾菜、牛粪、菇渣、玉米秸秆等种养废弃物为原料,设计8个配方进行好氧堆肥,以不施肥(CK1)和当地商品有机肥(CK2)为对照,除CK1外,其余处理按6 000 kg·hm^-2的施用量作基肥施入,研究不同堆肥对日光温室西葫芦养分利用和土壤性质的影响。结果表明,与CK2相比,羊粪、尾菜、秸秆按6∶3∶1的质量比混合堆肥的处理(T4),羊粪、尾菜、菇渣、秸秆按6∶2∶1∶1的质量比混合堆肥的处理(T7),其西葫芦干物质积累量分别显著(P<0.05)提高14.69%、9.97%,产量分别显著提高23.12%、18.01%。氮、磷、钾肥利用率以T4处理最高,分别较CK2处理显著提高了8.19、12.24、14.38百分点。T4处理显著提升了果实中的氮、磷、钾含量,T7处理显著提升了根中的氮、磷、钾含量。此外,T4和T7处理的土壤有机质、碱解氮、速效磷、速效钾含量亦较CK2显著增加。综上,T4处理的效果最佳,有利于西葫芦最大限度地吸收利用养分和促进营养物质向果实的分配转移,同时可以有效改善土壤理化性质,从而最终获得高产。

关键词: 种养废弃物, 西葫芦, 产量, 养分利用, 土壤

Abstract:

In view of the excessive application of chemical fertilizers in greenhouses vegetables production and the large amount of planting and breeding waste in northwest China, planting and breeding wastes, such as sheep dung, vegetable waste, cow dung, mushroom residue, straw, were used in 8 recipes of aerobic composting. The treatment without fertilization application and the treatment with local commercial organic fertilizer were set as controls, and were denoted as CK1 and CK2, respectively. Except CK1, 6 000 kg·hm^-2 composting products were applied in the other treatments, respectively, as the base fertilizer. The effects of treatments on nutrient utilization of zucchini and soil properties were studied. Compared with the CK2 treatment, the dry matter accumulation of zucchini under T4 (co-composting of sheep dung, vegetable waste and straw at a mass ratio of 6∶3∶1) and T7 (co-composting of sheep dung, vegetable waste, mushroom residue and straw at a mass ratio of 6∶2∶1∶1) was significantly (P<0.05) increased by 14.69% and 9.97%, respectively. The yield of zucchini under T4 and T7 was significantly increased by 23.12% and 18.01%, respectively. The nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizer utilization rates were the highest under the T4 treatment, which were significantly higher than those under CK2 by 8.19, 12.24 and 14.38 percentage points, respectively. The nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium contents in the fruit were significantly increased under T4 treatment than those under CK2, whiles the nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium contents in the root were significantly increased under T7 treatment than those under CK2. Besides, the contents of soil organic matter, alkaline hydrolysis nitrogen, available phosphorus and available potassium were significantly increased under T4 and T7 treatments. It was concluded that T4 treatment showed the best performance, as it was conducive to maximize the nutrient uptake and utilization capacity of zucchini, promote nutrients translocation to the fruit, as well as effectively improve soil physiochemical properties, hence to increase yield.

Key words: planting and breeding waste, zucchini, yield, nutrient utilization, soil

中图分类号:

铁建中, 刘亚昱, 高雪琴, 徐之奇, 胡琳莉, 郁继华. 种养废弃物堆肥对日光温室西葫芦养分利用和土壤性质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(6): 1427-1439.

TIE Jianzhong, LIU Yayu, GAO Xueqin, XU Zhiqi, HU Linli, YU Jihua. Effects of planting and breeding waste composting on nutrient utilization and soil properties of zucchini in greenhouse[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(6): 1427-1439.

图/表 11

参考文献 45

[1]	彭澎, 梁龙, 李海龙, 等. 我国设施农业现状、问题与发展建议[J]. 北方园艺, 2019(5): 161-168.
	PENG P, LIANG L, LI H L, et al. Status, deficiency and development suggestions of protected agriculture in China[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2019(5): 161-168. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]	蒋卫杰, 邓杰, 余宏军. 设施园艺发展概况、存在问题与产业发展建议[J]. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(17): 3515-3523.
	JIANG W J, DENG J, YU H J. Development situation, problems and suggestions on industrial development of protected horticulture[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(17): 3515-3523. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]	朱白澍, 梁涛. 我国设施农业土壤障碍现状[J]. 磷肥与复肥, 2010, 25(3): 73-75.
	ZHU B S, LIANG T. Status of soil obstacle of facility agriculture in China[J]. Phosphate & Compound Fertilizer, 2010, 25(3): 73-75. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]	袁洪波, 王海华, 庞树杰, 等. 日光温室封闭式栽培系统的设计与试验[J]. 农业工程学报, 2013, 29(21): 159-165.
	YUAN H B, WANG H H, PANG S J, et al. Design and experiment of closed culture system for solar greenhouse[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2013, 29(21): 159-165. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]	蔡红明, 王士超, 刘岩, 等. 陕西日光温室养分平衡及土壤养分累积特征研究[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 44(9): 83-91.
	CAI H M, WANG S C, LIU Y, et al. Nutrient balance and accumulation in soil of solar greenhouse in Shaanxi[J]. Journal of Northwest A & F University(Natural Science Edition), 2016, 44(9): 83-91. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]	刘苹, 李彦, 江丽华, 等. 施肥对蔬菜产量的影响: 以寿光市设施蔬菜为例[J]. 应用生态学报, 2014, 25(6): 1752-1758.
	LIU P, LI Y, JIANG L H, et al. Effects of fertilizer application on greenhouse vegetable yield: a case study of Shouguang City[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2014, 25(6): 1752-1758. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]	吴珏, 李建勇, 刘娜. 蚯蚓粪有机肥对番茄产量、品质和土壤化学性质的影响[J]. 上海农业学报, 2018, 34(4): 16-19.
	WU J, LI J Y, LIU N. Effect of vermicompost on production, quality of tomato and soil chemical property[J]. Acta Agriculturae Shanghai, 2018, 34(4): 16-19. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	申飞, 朱同彬, 滕明姣, 等. 蚓粪和益生菌互作对土壤性状及番茄产量和品质的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(2): 484-490.
	SHEN F, ZHU T B, TENG M J, et al. Effects of interaction between vermicompost and probiotics on soil property, yield and quality of tomato[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016, 27(2): 484-490. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	徐长春, 郑戈, 聂善明. 高原夏菜产业发展现状、存在问题及对策建议: 基于甘肃省榆中县的调研[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2016, 37(2): 52-56.
	XU C C, ZHENG G, NIE S M. Current situation, problems and policy suggestions on plateau summer vegetable industry: based on surveys in Yuzhong County, Gansu Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2016, 37(2): 52-56. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]	王颖, 王月, 吴昌永, 等. 西北生态脆弱区畜禽粪污处理技术综合评价[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2023, 13(2):654-662.
	WANG Y, WANG Y, WU C Y, et al. Comprehensive evaluation research of livestock and poultry waste treatment technology in the ecological fragile areas of Northwest China[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2023, 13(2):654-662. ( in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]	GREEN A. Agricultural waste and pollution[M]// Waste. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2019: 531-551.
[12]	WANG X T, ZHANG J B. Basic path and system construction of agricultural green and low-carbon development with respect to the strategic target of carbon peak and carbon neutrality[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2022, 30(4): 516-526.
[13]	王自科. 探索西北地区农牧交错地带种养结合农牧循环新路子: 甘肃省畜禽养殖循环发展方式之探析[J]. 畜牧业环境, 2019(4): 15-18.
	WANG Z K. Exploring a new way to combine farming and animal husbandry cycle in the ecotone between agriculture and animal husbandry in northwest China: analysis on the development mode of livestock and poultry breeding cycle in Gansu Province[J]. Animal Industry and Environment, 2019(4): 15-18. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]	李惠, 李建明, 丁明, 等. 堆肥浸提液对番茄、黄瓜种苗生长及养分吸收的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 45(2): 121-127.
	LI H, LI J M, DING M, et al. Effect of compost extracts on growth and nutrition absorption of tomato and cucumber seedlings[J]. Journal of Northwest A & F University(Natural Science Edition), 2017, 45(2): 121-127. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]	QIN X, DING Y F, JIN W. Feasibility analysis and practice research of resource utilization of waste from planting and breeding industry[J]. Meteorological and Environmental Research, 2010, 1: 73-75.
[16]	赵雪淞, 高欣, 宋王芳, 等. 秸秆还田对连作花生土壤综合肥力和作物产量的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2021(5): 207-213.
	ZHAO X S, GAO X, SONG W F, et al. Effects of straw mulching on soil fertility and crop yield of peanut under continuous cropping[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2021(5): 207-213. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]	钱晓雍, 沈根祥, 郭春霞, 等. 不同废弃物对设施菜地次生盐渍化土壤的修复效果[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2014, 33(4): 737-743.
	QIAN X Y, SHEN G X, GUO C X, et al. Reclamation of secondary salinized soils in protected vegetable fields using different wastes[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2014, 33(4): 737-743. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]	王淑兰, 王浩, 李娟, 等. 不同耕作方式下长期秸秆还田对旱作春玉米田土壤碳、氮、水含量及产量的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(5): 1530-1540.
	WANG S L, WANG H, LI J, et al. Effects of long-term straw mulching on soil organic carbon, nitrogen and moisture and spring maize yield on rain-fed croplands under different patterns of soil tillage practice[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016, 27(5): 1530-1540. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]	刘中良, 郑建利, 焦娟, 等. 麦秸、菌渣和稻壳还田对日光温室番茄品质及产量的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2017, 31(11): 2243-2249.
	LIU Z L, ZHENG J L, JIAO J, et al. Effects of wheat straw, mushroom dregs and rice husk returning on quality and yield of protected tomato[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 31(11): 2243-2249. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]	姚文英, 彭翠兰, 杨海俊, 等. 不同有机肥用量树叶复混基质对西葫芦的育苗效果[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(2): 247-253.
	YAO W Y, PENG C L, YANG H J, et al. Preliminary study on the effects of mixed substrate of leaves with different amount of organic fertilizer on seeding breeding of zucchini[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(2): 247-253. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]	鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
[22]	余小芬, 杨树明, 邹炳礼, 等. 云南多雨烟区增密减氮对烤烟产质量及养分利用率的调控效应[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020, 34(5): 327-333.
	YU X F, YANG S M, ZOU B L, et al. The regulatory effects of enhanced density combined with reduced nitrogen fertilizer on yield, quality and nutrient use efficiency of flue-cured tobacco in rainy areas, Yunnan Province[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 34(5): 327-333. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]	孙志祥, 韩上, 武际, 等. 秸秆还田对双季稻产量和土壤钾素平衡的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(9): 9-13.
	SUN Z X, HAN S, WU J, et al. Effect of straw returning on yield and soil potassium balance of double cropping rice[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(9): 9-13. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24]	李敏, 罗德强, 江学海, 等. 控水增密模式对杂交籼稻减氮后产量形成的调控效应[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(9): 1430-1447.
	LI M, LUO D Q, JIANG X H, et al. Regulations of controlled irrigations and increased densities on yield formation of hybrid indica rice under nitrogen-reduction conditions[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2020, 46(9): 1430-1447. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25]	黄宁, 王朝辉, 王丽, 等. 我国主要麦区主栽高产品种产量差异及其与产量构成和氮磷钾吸收利用的关系[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(1): 81-93.
	HUANG N, WANG Z H, WANG L, et al. Yield variation of winter wheat and its relationship to yield components, NPK uptake and utilization of leading and high yielding wheat cultivars in main wheat production regions of China[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(1): 81-93. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26]	叶廷红, 李鹏飞, 侯文峰, 等. 早稻、晚稻和中稻干物质积累及氮素吸收利用的差异[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26(2): 212-222.
	YE T H, LI P F, HOU W F, et al. Differences in dry matter accumulation and nitrogen absorption and utilization among early, late and middle rice[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2020, 26(2): 212-222. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[27]	高日平, 刘小月, 潘遵天, 等. 生物菌剂对玉米秸秆堆沤过程水热状况及酶活性的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023(2):174-181.
	GAO R P, LIU X Y, PAN Z T, et al. Effects of biological agents on hydrothermal status and enzyme activity during composting of corn straw[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023(2):174-181. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[28]	孔涛, 李勃, 柯杨, 等. 蔬菜废弃物堆肥对设施蔬菜产量和土壤生物特性的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2017(5): 157-160.
	KONG T, LI B, KE Y, et al. Effect of vegetables waste compost on protected vegetable yield and soil microbial property[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2017(5): 157-160. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[29]	张新建, 高贤彪, 宁晓光, 等. 尾菜有机肥对土壤肥力及圆白菜和小茴香产量和品质的影响[J]. 食品安全质量检测学报, 2021, 12(6): 2345-2350.
	ZHANG X J, GAO X B, NING X G, et al. Effects of vegetable waste fertilizer on soil fertility, yield and quality of cabbage and cumin[J]. Journal of Food Safety & Quality, 2021, 12(6): 2345-2350. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[30]	李小英, 陈丽美, 李俊龙, 等. 两种有机肥对云南元谋紫甘蓝光合特性及其产量和品质的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2022, 40(3): 145-153.
	LI X Y, CHEN L M, LI J L, et al. Effects of two organic fertilizers on photosynthetic characteristics, yield and quality of purple cabbage in Yuanmou, Yunnan Province[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2022, 40(3): 145-153. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[31]	石晓晓, 郑国砥, 高定, 等. 中国畜禽粪便养分资源总量及替代化肥潜力[J]. 资源科学, 2021, 43(2): 403-411.
	SHI X X, ZHENG G D, GAO D, et al. Quantity of available nutrient in livestock manure and its potential of replacing chemical fertilizers in China[J]. Resources Science, 2021, 43(2): 403-411. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[32]	王冰清, 尹能文, 郑棉海, 等. 化肥减量配施有机肥对蔬菜产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2012, 28(1): 242-247.
	WANG B Q, YIN N W, ZHENG M H, et al. Effects of reduction of chemical fertilizer and organic manure supplement on vegetables yield and quality[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2012, 28(1): 242-247. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[33]	胡小璇, 江尚焘, 安祥瑞, 等. 有机无机肥配施对芒果产量与品质及经济效益的影响[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2020, 43(6): 1107-1115.
	HU X X, JIANG S T, AN X R, et al. Effects of combined application of organic and inorganic fertilizers on mango yield, quality and economic benefit[J]. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University, 2020, 43(6): 1107-1115. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[34]	IKEURA H, TOKUDA T, HAYATA Y. Required amounts of medium and fertilizer for potted culture of zucchini[J]. Agricultural Sciences, 2012, 3(6): 816-821.
[35]	张洋, 李旺雄, 刘晓奇, 等. 施钾量对设施基质栽培番茄生长生理及其产量和品质的影响[J]. 西北植物学报, 2021, 41(10): 1725-1735.
	ZHANG Y, LI W X, LIU X Q, et al. Effect of potassium application rate on growth physiology, yield and quality of tomato cultivated in facility substrate[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2021, 41(10): 1725-1735. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[36]	魏晓兰, 吴彩姣, 孙玮, 等. 减量施肥条件下生物有机肥对土壤养分供应及小白菜吸收的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017, 37(1): 40-44.
	WEI X L, WU C J, SUN W, et al. Effect of bio-organic fertilizer on soil nutrient supply and absorption of Bok choy under different decreasing fertilization[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2017, 37(1): 40-44. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[37]	范文思, 岳东林, 凌爱芬, 等. 腐熟农家肥用量对土壤养分和烤烟品质的影响[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2018, 39(5): 71-78.
	FAN W S, YUE D L, LING A F, et al. Effect of different well-rotted farmyard manure application rates on soil nutrients and flue-cured tobacco quality[J]. Chinese Tobacco Science, 2018, 39(5): 71-78. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[38]	马宜林, 吴广海, 申洪涛, 等. 羊粪有机肥与化肥配施对烤烟生长及土壤肥力特性的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2021, 35(10): 2423-2430.
	MA Y L, WU G H, SHEN H T, et al. Effects of combined application of sheep manure-derived organic fertilizer and chemical fertilizer on tobacco growth and soil fertility[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 35(10): 2423-2430. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[39]	CUI X W, ZHANG Y Z, GAO J S, et al. Long-term combined application of manure and chemical fertilizer sustained higher nutrient status and rhizospheric bacterial diversity in reddish paddy soil of Central South China[J]. Scientific Reports, 2018, 8: 16554.
[40]	俄胜哲, 丁宁平, 李利利, 等. 长期施肥条件下黄土高原黑垆土作物产量与土壤碳氮的关系[J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(12): 4047-4055.
	E S Z, DING N P, LI L L, et al. Relationship of crop yield and soil organic carbon and nitrogen under long-term fertilization in black loessial soil region on the Loess Plateau in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2018, 29(12): 4047-4055. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[41]	VERLEYSEN K, COPPITTERS D, PARENTE A, et al. How can power-to-ammonia be robust?: optimization of an ammonia synthesis plant powered by a wind turbine considering operational uncertainties[J]. Fuel, 2020, 266: 117049.
[42]	宁川川, 王建武, 蔡昆争. 有机肥对土壤肥力和土壤环境质量的影响研究进展[J]. 生态环境学报, 2016, 25(1): 175-181.
	NING C C, WANG J W, CAI K Z. The effects of organic fertilizers on soil fertility and soil environmental quality: a review[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2016, 25(1): 175-181. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[43]	朱金霞, 孔德杰, 尹志荣. 农作物秸秆主要化学组成及还田后对土壤质量提升影响的研究进展[J]. 北方园艺, 2020(5): 146-153.
	ZHU J X, KONG D J, YIN Z R. Research progress on the main chemical composition of straw and effect of returning straw to fields on soil quality improvement[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2020(5): 146-153. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[44]	李琳, 向丹, 武亚芬, 等. 长期不同施肥方式对日光温室番茄土壤养分和微生物群落结构的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(2): 415-422.
	LI L, XIANG D, WU Y F, et al. Effects of long-term different fertilization patterns on soil nutrients and microbial community structure of tomato in a solar greenhouse[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2022, 33(2): 415-422. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[45]	卢维宏, 张乃明, 包立, 等. 我国设施栽培连作障碍特征与成因及防治措施的研究进展[J]. 土壤, 2020, 52(4): 651-658.
	LU W H, ZHANG N M, BAO L, et al. Study advances on characteristics, causes and control measures of continuous cropping obstacles of facility cultivation in China[J]. Soils, 2020, 52(4): 651-658. (in Chinese with English abstract)

原料 Raw material	全氮 Total N/ (g·kg^-1)	全磷 Total P/ (g·kg^-1)	全钾 Total K/ (g·kg^-1)	碱解氮 Alkaline hydrolysis N/(mg·kg^-1)	速效磷 Available P/ (mg·kg^-1)	速效钾 Available K/ (mg·kg^-1)	有机质 Organic matter/ (g·kg^-1)
菇渣Mushroom residue	9.10	6.65	11.4	630.58	284.33	9 253.33	470.31
牛粪Cow dung	9.00	5.71	13.3	686.58	383.29	6 786.67	510.76
羊粪Sheep dung	8.99	6.61	11.8	658.58	304.87	9 320.00	945.67
秸秆Straw	10.04	7.79	15.09	546.58	385.61	8 246.67	998.77
尾菜Vegetable waste	11.09	5.41	139.6	971.25	391.25	13 886.67	614.43

原料 Raw material	全氮 Total N/ (g·kg^-1)	全磷 Total P/ (g·kg^-1)	全钾 Total K/ (g·kg^-1)	碱解氮 Alkaline hydrolysis N/(mg·kg^-1)	速效磷 Available P/ (mg·kg^-1)	速效钾 Available K/ (mg·kg^-1)	有机质 Organic matter/ (g·kg^-1)
菇渣Mushroom residue	9.10	6.65	11.4	630.58	284.33	9 253.33	470.31
牛粪Cow dung	9.00	5.71	13.3	686.58	383.29	6 786.67	510.76
羊粪Sheep dung	8.99	6.61	11.8	658.58	304.87	9 320.00	945.67
秸秆Straw	10.04	7.79	15.09	546.58	385.61	8 246.67	998.77
尾菜Vegetable waste	11.09	5.41	139.6	971.25	391.25	13 886.67	614.43

处理 Treatment	全氮 Total N/ (g·kg^-1)	全磷 Total P/ (g·kg^-1)	全钾 Total K/ (g·kg^-1)	碱解氮 Alkaline hydrolysis N/ (mg·kg^-1)	速效磷 Available P/ (mg·kg^-1)	速效钾 Available K/ (mg·kg^-1)	有机质 Organic matter/ (g·kg^-1)	pH	电导率 Electric conductivity/ (mS·cm^-1)
CK2	9.19	4.27	14.60	434.58	122.11	7 596.7	227.57	8.14	4.81
T1	8.09	3.40	15.35	429.92	143.29	8 123.3	195.33	7.95	4.92
T2	9.37	4.12	13.76	415.92	100.87	7 013.3	132.75	8.07	5.33
T3	9.19	4.38	11.68	476.58	93.33	6 856.7	176.37	8.03	5.63
T4	10.13	4.54	14.99	504.58	165.40	8 860.0	394.45	8.25	6.35
T5	10.17	4.27	10.11	411.25	96.54	7 453.3	195.33	8.08	5.32
T6	10.49	4.50	14.28	415.92	166.01	8 240.0	244.64	8.13	5.91
T7	11.34	4.86	13.77	555.92	161.93	9 746.7	384.97	8.18	6.19
T8	10.90	4.64	14.00	448.58	173.55	8 530.0	252.22	8.24	6.65

处理 Treatment	全氮 Total N/ (g·kg^-1)	全磷 Total P/ (g·kg^-1)	全钾 Total K/ (g·kg^-1)	碱解氮 Alkaline hydrolysis N/ (mg·kg^-1)	速效磷 Available P/ (mg·kg^-1)	速效钾 Available K/ (mg·kg^-1)	有机质 Organic matter/ (g·kg^-1)	pH	电导率 Electric conductivity/ (mS·cm^-1)
CK2	9.19	4.27	14.60	434.58	122.11	7 596.7	227.57	8.14	4.81
T1	8.09	3.40	15.35	429.92	143.29	8 123.3	195.33	7.95	4.92
T2	9.37	4.12	13.76	415.92	100.87	7 013.3	132.75	8.07	5.33
T3	9.19	4.38	11.68	476.58	93.33	6 856.7	176.37	8.03	5.63
T4	10.13	4.54	14.99	504.58	165.40	8 860.0	394.45	8.25	6.35
T5	10.17	4.27	10.11	411.25	96.54	7 453.3	195.33	8.08	5.32
T6	10.49	4.50	14.28	415.92	166.01	8 240.0	244.64	8.13	5.91
T7	11.34	4.86	13.77	555.92	161.93	9 746.7	384.97	8.18	6.19
T8	10.90	4.64	14.00	448.58	173.55	8 530.0	252.22	8.24	6.65

处理 Treatment	产量 Yield/ ( t·hm^-2)	肥料贡献率 Fertilizer contribution rate/%
CK1	7.33±0.55 e	—
CK2	10.77±0.38 cd	31.59±2.43 bcd
T1	10.97±0.82 bcd	31.47±5.71 bcd
T2	10.13±0.41 d	27.18±2.99 d
T3	12.49±0.32 abc	41.15±1.50 ab
T4	13.26±0.44 a	44.46±1.93 a
T5	10.21±0.40 d	27.70±3.06 d
T6	12.43±0.81 abc	39.81±4.70 abc
T7	12.71±0.84 ab	41.34±3.75 ab
T8	10.42±0.19 d	29.55±1.33 cd

种养废弃物堆肥对日光温室西葫芦养分利用和土壤性质的影响

Effects of planting and breeding waste composting on nutrient utilization and soil properties of zucchini in greenhouse

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 11

参考文献 45

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

处理 Treat- ment	根Root		茎Stem		叶Leaf		叶柄Petiole		果实Fruit		积累总量 Total accumula- tion/g
处理 Treat- ment	干重 Dry weight/g	分配率 Partition coefficient/%	干重 Dry weight/g	分配率 Partition coefficient/%	干重 Dry weight/g	分配率 Partition coefficient/%	干重 Dry weight/g	分配率 Partition coefficient/%	干重 Dry weight/g	分配率 Partition coefficient/%	积累总量 Total accumula- tion/g
CK1	4.01± 0.02 f	1.57± 0.01 a	14.44± 0.58 d	5.63± 0.24 de	71.03± 0.52 g	27.71± 0.28 a	34.29± 0.48 f	13.37± 0.20 b	123.77± 0.75 g	51.72± 0.45 f	256.37± 1.02 f
CK2	5.93± 0.03 c	1.53± 0.01 ab	24.52± 0.42 b	6.33± 0.15 bc	102.73± 0.77 c	26.52± 0.29 b	52.28± 0.78 c	13.49± 0.15 b	185.46± 1.87 c	52.13± 0.57 ef	387.47± 4.77 d
T1	5.48± 0.03 d	1.50± 0.01 b	24.88± 0.10 b	6.83± 0.02 a	93.36± 0.71 f	25.62± 0.16 cd	48.86± 0.16 d	13.41± 0.11 b	172.58± 0.88 e	52.64± 0.26 ef	364.41± 2.15 e
T2	5.00± 0.03 e	1.37± 0.01 c	22.91± 0.47 c	6.28± 0.10 bc	97.27± 0.65 e	26.66± 0.06 b	42.84± 0.10 e	11.74± 0.05 d	168.01± 1.22 f	53.95± 0.13 cd	364.83± 1.95 e
T3	6.10± 0.08 b	1.51± 0.02 b	23.24± 0.16 c	5.75± 0.07 de	101.20± 1.49 cd	25.03± 0.26 de	47.74± 0.64 d	11.81± 0.21 d	178.27± 0.63 d	55.90± 0.06 b	404.27± 1.84 c
T4	6.18± 0.05 b	1.39± 0.01 c	27.75± 0.21 a	6.24± 0.03 c	111.55± 0.97 a	25.10± 0.15 cde	55.56± 0.74 b	12.50± 0.13 c	201.03± 1.87 a	54.76± 0.29 c	444.38± 1.37 a
T5	5.08± 0.08 e	1.25± 0.02 d	22.34± 0.75 c	5.49± 0.19 e	98.79± 0.50 de	24.27± 0.14 f	48.41± 0.67 d	11.89± 0.18 d	174.61± 1.36 de	57.10± 0.38 a	407.05± 0.46 c
T6	5.92± 0.06 c	1.39± 0.02 c	28.35± 0.36 a	6.65± 0.08 ab	105.36± 0.64 b	24.73± 0.12 ef	61.02± 1.06 a	14.32± 0.26 a	200.65± 1.15 a	52.91± 0.26 de	426.12± 2.67 b
T7	6.51± 0.08 a	1.53± 0.01 ab	27.25± 0.21 a	6.39± 0.04 bc	107.28± 0.91 b	25.18± 0.22 cde	53.15± 1.02 c	12.47± 0.23 c	194.19± 1.80 b	54.43± 0.40 c	426.11± 1.12 b
T8	5.39± 0.03 d	1.39± 0.02 c	22.85± 0.47 c	5.88± 0.07 d	100.02± 1.06 d	25.77± 0.37 c	48.86± 0.62 d	12.59± 0.12 c	177.12± 1.58 d	54.38± 0.41 c	388.25± 3.77 d

处理 Treat- ment	根Root		茎Stem		叶Leaf		叶柄Petiole		果实Fruit
处理 Treat- ment	吸氮量 N uptake amount/mg	分配率 Allocation rate/%	吸氮量 N uptake amount/mg	分配率 Allocation rate/%	吸氮量 N uptake amount/mg	分配率 Allocation rate/%	吸氮量 N uptake amount/mg	分配率 Allocation rate/%	吸氮量 N uptake amount/mg	分配率 Allocation rate/%
CK1	7.79± 0.10 h	0.66± 0.01 a	35.45± 1.36 g	3.02± 0.11 a	311.42± 11.88 e	26.50± 0.85 a	67.27± 2.19 g	5.73± 0.23 d	753.03± 12.65 g	64.09± 1.01 cd
CK2	17.75± 0.09 c	0.64± 0.01 ab	84.25± 1.82 bc	3.02± 0.10 a	613.62± 1.51 c	22.00± 0.25 c	179.16± 3.17 e	6.42± 0.06 bc	1 895.09± 34.71 de	67.92± 0.36 b
T1	13.92± 0.13 g	0.52± 0.01 d	80.57± 0.53 c	3.01± 0.02 a	641.45± 8.58 c	23.99± 0.15 b	204.18± 2.20 c	7.64± 0.08 a	1 733.41± 19.08 e	64.84± 0.23 c
T2	15.57± 0.07 e	0.63± 0.01 ab	61.78± 1.35 f	2.51± 0.06 b	680.20± 17.98 b	27.63± 0.65 a	159.78± 0.60 f	6.49± 0.04 bc	1 544.54± 14.31 f	62.74± 0.66 d
T3	14.10± 0.17 g	0.46± 0.01 e	68.34± 1.50 de	2.24± 0.05 c	688.98± 5.15 b	22.55± 0.18 c	208.55± 1.67 bc	6.82± 0.05 b	2 075.87± 5.83 b	67.93± 0.16 b
T4	18.25± 0.10 b	0.52± 0.01 d	86.58± 0.68 b	2.46± 0.02 bc	709.97± 13.25 b	20.17± 0.32 d	214.42± 3.14 b	6.09± 0.11 cd	2 490.27± 43.67 a	70.75± 0.44 a
T5	17.59± 0.24 c	0.62± 0.02 bc	64.50± 2.26 ef	2.29± 0.13 c	525.57± 6.28 d	18.61± 0.20 e	191.76± 2.80 d	6.80± 0.25 b	2 026.57± 64.14 c	71.68± 0.59 a
T6	14.94± 0.15 f	0.48± 0.02 e	69.31± 0.66 d	2.24± 0.06 c	617.81± 6.80 c	19.92± 0.28 de	187.89± 3.59 de	6.06± 0.17 cd	2 213.03± 62.16 a	71.30± 0.45 a
T7	19.58± 0.33 a	0.63± 0.02 ab	95.91± 0.53 a	3.09± 0.04 a	750.43± 12.77 a	24.17± 0.37 b	226.13± 5.81 a	7.28± 0.20 a	2 013.41± 25.67 cd	64.83± 0.58 c
T8	16.77± 0.13 d	0.59± 0.01 c	81.54± 1.71 c	2.88± 0.03 a	638.08± 12.50 c	22.52± 0.61 c	165.15± 2.99 f	5.83± 0.04 d	1 932.86± 34.24 cd	68.18± 0.55 b

处理 Treat- ment	根Root		茎Stem		叶Leaf		叶柄Petiole		果实Fruit
处理 Treat- ment	吸磷量 P uptake amount/mg	分配率 Allocation rate/%	吸磷量 P uptake amount/mg	分配率 Allocation rate/%	吸磷量 P uptake amount/mg	分配率 Allocation rate/%	吸磷量 P uptake amount/mg	分配率 Allocation rate/%	吸磷量 P uptake amount/mg	分配率 Allocation rate/%
CK1	14.61± 0.10 f	1.37± 0.01 a	51.14± 2.30 f	4.81± 0.22 cde	290.47± 4.15 g	27.32± 0.55 a	127.90± 2.30 f	12.03± 0.27 a	579.28± 11.94 g	54.46± 0.78 f
CK2	30.73± 1.36 d	1.18± 0.05 b	129.60± 1.01 d	4.97± 0.08 cde	619.07± 8.69 de	23.73± 0.29 cd	274.70± 3.40 ab	10.53± 0.15 b	1 554.93± 28.48 e	59.59± 0.56 e
T1	22.48± 0.23 e	0.91± 0.01 f	129.67± 1.93 d	5.22± 0.10 bc	567.58± 3.51 f	22.86± 0.22 de	247.01± 1.75 c	9.95± 0.11 bc	1 516.73± 15.71 ef	61.07± 0.40 cde
T2	24.16± 0.21 e	1.02± 0.02 cd	139.71± 1.83 c	5.87± 0.14 a	607.78± 4.39 e	25.54± 0.45 b	177.08± 2.67 e	7.44± 0.19 e	1 432.10± 34.08 f	60.13± 0.80 de
T3	32.60± 0.35 c	1.16± 0.02 b	153.77± 3.40 b	5.47± 0.16 ab	611.09± 7.43 e	21.73± 0.10 fg	215.25± 3.53 d	7.66± 0.18 e	1 799.79± 20.94 cd	63.99± 0.25 b
T4	34.57± 0.66 b	0.99± 0.01 de	169.29± 1.99 a	4.85± 0.03 cde	683.16± 8.63 a	19.58± 0.11 h	263.49± 5.68 b	7.55± 0.12 e	2 338.26± 25.94 a	67.02± 0.21 a
T5	23.30± 0.57 e	0.78± 0.03 g	140.37± 4.71 c	4.72± 0.25 de	635.00± 8.27 cd	21.32± 0.37 g	240.48± 2.40 c	8.08± 0.24 de	1 941.02± 64.07 b	65.10± 0.80 b
T6	31.14± 0.23 cd	1.08± 0.02 c	146.36± 2.24 bc	5.06± 0.06 bcd	662.24± 8.43 ab	22.89± 0.02 de	288.47± 6.79 a	9.98± 0.35 bc	1 765.36± 32.07 d	61.00± 0.37 cde
T7	37.16± 0.63 a	1.23± 0.03 b	146.31± 3.42 bc	4.85± 0.13 cde	679.53± 6.95 a	22.53± 0.26 ef	282.67± 10.25 a	9.37± 0.36 c	1 870.57± 28.09 bc	62.01± 0.60 c
T8	24.20± 0.33 e	0.92± 0.02 ef	118.06± 1.76 e	4.51± 0.08 e	642.07± 9.14 bc	24.50± 0.32 c	225.16± 4.39 d	8.59± 0.10 d	1 610.79± 14.43 e	61.47± 0.27 cd

处理 Treat- ment	根Root		茎Stem		叶Leaf		叶柄Petiole		果实Fruit
处理 Treat- ment	吸钾量 K uptake amount/mg	分配率 Allocation rate/%	吸钾量 K uptake amount/mg	分配率 Allocation rate/%	吸钾量 K uptake amount/mg	分配率 Allocation rate/%	吸钾量 K uptake amount/mg	分配率 Allocation rate/%	吸钾量 K uptake amount/mg	分配率 Allocation rate/%
CK1	67.71± 0.75 g	0.80± 0.01 f	528.65± 20.41 g	6.23± 0.23 defg	1 904.33± 25.26 g	22.46± 0.27 d	702.52± 20.36 f	8.29± 0.28 d	5 276.40± 44.16 f	62.22± 0.37 a
CK2	121.62± 0.77 b	0.97± 0.01 b	851.83± 5.26 c	6.76± 0.07 bc	3 059.36± 32.37 c	24.27± 0.17 ab	1 180.94± 30.97 b	9.37± 0.17 b	7 390.68± 59.77 cd	58.64± 0.19 d
T1	92.06± 1.18 f	0.79± 0.01 f	905.02± 9.02 b	7.75± 0.07 a	2 791.81± 18.65 f	23.91± 0.18 bc	999.79± 8.37 d	8.56± 0.11 cd	6 886.91± 70.16 e	58.98± 0.34 cd
T2	97.81± 0.71 e	0.86± 0.01 de	721.59± 13.98 f	6.34± 0.09 def	2 803.44± 20.20 f	24.63± 0.10 a	875.86± 7.27 e	7.70± 0.07 e	6 881.95± 22.99 e	60.47± 0.10 b
T3	110.52± 1.82 c	0.87± 0.02 d	770.62± 8.30 de	6.03± 0.08 fg	2 883.94± 13.47 e	22.55± 0.11 d	1 038.47± 17.18 cd	8.12± 0.17 de	7 988.05± 69.42 b	62.45± 0.29 a
T4	138.01± 1.30 a	1.00± 0.01 ab	918.98± 4.96 ab	6.63± 0.03 bcd	3 330.11± 33.28 a	24.01± 0.18 abc	1 277.05± 18.38 a	9.21± 0.11 b	8 206.10± 23.44 a	59.16± 0.28 cd
T5	103.04± 1.95 d	0.82± 0.02 ef	806.40± 27.83 d	6.44± 0.25 cde	2 995.71± 29.22 cd	23.92± 0.10 bc	1 078.54± 16.99 c	8.61± 0.18 cd	7 541.23± 92.71 c	60.21± 0.28 b
T6	118.02± 1.11 b	0.92± 0.01 c	752.74± 13.38 ef	5.89± 0.10 g	3 023.24± 17.13 cd	23.65± 0.18 bc	1 311.29± 17.06 a	10.26± 0.13 a	7 577.66± 43.71 c	59.28± 0.19 cd
T7	139.72± 3.02 a	1.02± 0.02 a	951.32± 7.19 a	6.96± 0.04 b	3 201.22± 25.67 b	23.41± 0.23 c	1 220.93± 26.98 b	8.93± 0.19 bc	8 161.93± 53.63 ab	59.68± 0.32 bc
T8	104.57± 1.17 d	0.86± 0.01 de	748.24± 16.10 ef	6.16± 0.11 efg	2 954.26± 38.00 de	24.32± 0.41 ab	1 027.58± 12.74 cd	8.46± 0.09 cd	7 317.09± 91.86 d	60.21± 0.39 b

处理 Treatment	氮肥利用率 N use efficiency/%	磷肥利用率 P use efficiency/%	钾肥利用率 K use efficiency/%
CK2	18.14±0.42 cd	21.49±0.43 e	46.87±1.27 bc
T1	16.83±0.30 d	19.75±0.13 f	36.31±0.76 e
T2	14.45±0.13 e	18.32±0.35 g	32.96±0.60 f
T3	21.12±0.05 b	24.32±0.31 d	48.99±0.60 b
T4	26.33±0.56 a	33.73±0.54 a	61.25±0.43 a
T5	18.54±0.74 c	26.66±0.85 bc	45.96±1.08 c
T6	21.65±0.76 b	25.45±0.49 cd	48.90±0.43 b
T7	21.68±0.26 b	27.16±0.29 b	59.03±0.34 a
T8	18.64±0.34 c	21.65±0.29 e	41.72±1.00 d

处理 Treatment	碱解氮 Alkaline hydrolysis N/(mg·kg^-1)	速效磷 Available phosphorus/ (mg·kg^-1)	速效钾 Available potassium/ (mg·kg^-1)	有机质 Organic matter/ (g·kg^-1)	pH	电导率 Electric conductivity/ (μS·cm^-1)
CK1	52.73±0.82 h	58.95±0.64 h	164.40±3.09 g	4.25±0.08 f	8.14±0.01 a	305.97±4.17 d
CK2	88.90±0.73 d	81.54±0.59 c	259.23±0.67 d	8.51±0.05 c	8.09±0.01 b	322.50±1.32 bc
T1	86.33±0.23 e	74.00±0.66 f	230.03±0.59 f	8.06±0.08 d	8.09±0.01 b	315.33±1.20 cd
T2	75.13±0.31 g	71.33±0.28 g	228.90±1.30 f	7.87±0.05 e	8.11±0.01 b	312.07±0.64 d
T3	91.82±0.51 c	73.26±0.15 f	288.70±0.91 b	7.91±0.03 de	8.10±0.01 b	291.40±2.08 e
T4	94.38±0.51 b	87.18±0.50 a	299.83±3.85 a	9.30±0.02 a	8.04±0.01 c	330.67±4.10 b
T5	82.95±0.40 f	78.30±0.39 d	243.00±0.99 e	8.38±0.08 c	8.10±0.01 b	348.33±4.41 a
T6	83.65±0.20 f	75.60±0.37 e	262.93±0.38 d	8.78±0.04 b	8.09±0.01 b	324.33±5.21 bc
T7	96.72±0.31 a	82.98±0.20 b	298.03±0.86 a	9.46±0.07 a	8.06±0.01 c	350.33±1.45 a
T8	89.95±0.40 d	88.47±0.63 a	282.27±2.32 c	9.29±0.05 a	8.01±0.01 d	342.67±1.20 a

[1]	吴菊, 杨飞, 吴国泉, 傅贤, 徐晨光. 砂培和土壤栽培对黄瓜生长、产量与品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(9): 1905-1913.
[2]	朱为静, 吴佳, 洪春来, 朱凤香, 洪磊东, 张涛, 张硕, 诸惠芬. 秸秆覆盖对土壤水热肥及蟠桃产量和品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(9): 1924-1932.
[3]	韦庆翠, 姜娜英, 沈骏扬, 张焕朝, 张衡锋. 化肥减量配施生物质炭对高沙土氮磷淋失及土壤性质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(9): 1943-1950.
[4]	张智颖, 邱琴, 侯立娟, 徐平, 蒋宁, 林金盛, 李辉平, 曲绍轩, 马林, 王伟霞, 李福后. 杀虫剂施用对秀珍菇和毛木耳的安全性评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(8): 1733-1742.
[5]	谭海霞, 彭红丽, 王连龙, 魏建梅. 马铃薯健康株与疮痂病株根区土壤微生物群落多样性差异分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(8): 1743-1754.
[6]	高扬, 张瑜昕, 卜爱爱, 徐佳怡, 马嘉伟, 叶正钱, 柳丹, 方先芝. 基于改进的内梅罗综合指数法的浙江省典型“非粮化”土壤肥力质量评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(8): 1755-1765.
[7]	严福林, 郎云虎, 简应权, 陈雄飞, 魏巍, 王志威, 安江勇, 任得强, 丁宁, 魏升华. 八爪金龙药材产量与品质对土壤理化性状的响应[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(8): 1766-1775.
[8]	江振蓝, 陈付勋, 罗双飞, 罗烨琴, 沙晋明. 基于多光谱变换和主成分分析的土壤全铁含量随机森林模型反演[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(7): 1521-1532.
[9]	张智, 何豪豪, 郁妙, 许剑锋. 化肥减量配施土壤改良剂对土壤酸度、土壤养分和水稻产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(6): 1301-1308.
[10]	林小兵, 黎江, 成艳红, 王斌强, 何绍浪, 黄尚书, 黄欠如. 不同有机物料对土壤微生物生物量、矿质氮含量与水稻产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(6): 1309-1318.
[11]	何昕昀, 邓碧纯, 胡清钰, 冯宏, 郭彦彪. 基于土壤溶液中硝态氮浓度的香蕉氮肥施用研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(6): 1319-1326.
[12]	任宁, 俞国红, 郑航, 陈志东. 基于离散元法的茶园土壤参数标定[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(6): 1353-1359.
[13]	卓文琪, 麻万诸, 卓志清, 朱康莹. 亚热带残积与坡积母质发育的低山林地土壤性状比较[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(5): 1121-1129.
[14]	苏扬, 商小兰, 钱忠明, 吴林根, 黄佳琦, 庄海峰, 赵宇飞, 党洪阳, 徐立军. 腐熟剂与生物炭协同强化秸秆还田对土壤质量和水稻生长的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(5): 1139-1148.
[15]	朱哲毅, 施芳, 宁可, 郑姗. 政策激励对农户保护性耕作技术采纳行为的影响——基于要素质量和时间偏好的视角[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(5): 1172-1181.