浙江农业学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (12): 2809-2817.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20221742
温红瑞(), 齐明江, 高昌鹏, 田晓雨, 李雪梅, 周玉香(
)
收稿日期:
2022-12-04
出版日期:
2023-12-25
发布日期:
2023-12-27
作者简介:
温红瑞(1998—),女,河北张家口人,硕士研究生,从事反刍动物营养与饲料研究。E-mail: wenhrwenrr@163.com
通讯作者:
*周玉香,E-mail: zhyxzhww@163.com
基金资助:
WEN Hongrui(), QI Mingjiang, GAO Changpeng, TIAN Xiaoyu, LI Xuemei, ZHOU Yuxiang(
)
Received:
2022-12-04
Online:
2023-12-25
Published:
2023-12-27
摘要:
本试验旨在研究单宁对育肥滩羊生长性能、消化代谢以及屠宰性能的影响。选取体重相近的健康滩羊公羔27只,随机分为3组,每组9只。3组滩羊分别饲喂含0(对照组)、2 000(试验Ⅰ组)和 4 000 mg·kg-1(试验Ⅱ组)单宁的试验饲粮。预试期10 d,正试期60 d。结果表明:与对照组相比,试验Ⅱ组滩羊极显著提高了干物质采食量(P<0.01),显著提高了总增重和平均日增重(P<0.05)。与对照组相比,试验组滩羊极显著提高了氮摄入量、食入总能和消化能(P<0.01),显著提高了干物质表观消化率、沉积氮、氮沉积率和总能表观消化率(P<0.05)。与对照组相比,试验组显著提高羊只的宰前活重、胴体重、净肉重以及眼肌面积(P<0.05)。综上所述,在饲粮中添加单宁可以提高育肥滩羊的生长性能、消化代谢和屠宰性能,在本试验条件下,以添加水平为 4 000 mg·kg-1时效果最佳,可以在生产中推广使用。
中图分类号:
温红瑞, 齐明江, 高昌鹏, 田晓雨, 李雪梅, 周玉香. 单宁对育肥滩羊生长性能、消化代谢以及屠宰性能的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(12): 2809-2817.
WEN Hongrui, QI Mingjiang, GAO Changpeng, TIAN Xiaoyu, LI Xuemei, ZHOU Yuxiang. Effect of tannin on growth performance, digestion and metabolism and slaughtering performance of fattening Tan sheep[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(12): 2809-2817.
项目Items | 含量Content | 营养指标Nutrient inde | 营养水平Nutrient levels |
---|---|---|---|
青贮玉米Maize silage/% | 15.00 | 代谢能Metabolizable energy/(MJ·kg-1)2) | 9.40 |
苜蓿干草Alfalfa hay/% | 30.00 | 粗蛋白质Crude protein/% | 12.39 |
玉米Corn grain/% | 29.74 | 钙Ca/% | 0.52 |
豆粕Soybean meal/% | 14.50 | 磷P/% | 0.36 |
麦麸Wheat bran/% | 6.00 | 中性洗涤纤维Neutral detergent fiber/% | 32.75 |
预混料Premi | 5.00 | 酸性洗涤纤维Acid detergent fiber/% | 21.35 |
合计Total/% | 100.00 |
表1 基础饲粮组成及营养水平(干物质基础)
Table 1 Composition and nutrient levels of basal diets (dry matter basis)
项目Items | 含量Content | 营养指标Nutrient inde | 营养水平Nutrient levels |
---|---|---|---|
青贮玉米Maize silage/% | 15.00 | 代谢能Metabolizable energy/(MJ·kg-1)2) | 9.40 |
苜蓿干草Alfalfa hay/% | 30.00 | 粗蛋白质Crude protein/% | 12.39 |
玉米Corn grain/% | 29.74 | 钙Ca/% | 0.52 |
豆粕Soybean meal/% | 14.50 | 磷P/% | 0.36 |
麦麸Wheat bran/% | 6.00 | 中性洗涤纤维Neutral detergent fiber/% | 32.75 |
预混料Premi | 5.00 | 酸性洗涤纤维Acid detergent fiber/% | 21.35 |
合计Total/% | 100.00 |
图1 单宁对育肥滩羊生长性能的影响 标准差顶部的字母表示差异显著性,没有相同大写字母表示差异极显著(P<0.01),没有相同小写字母表示差异显著(P<0.05)。下同。
Fig.1 Effect of tannin on the growth performance of Tan sheep Letters at the top of the standard deviation indicates significant difference, different capital letters indicate extremely significant difference (P<0.01), and different lowercase letters indicate significant difference (P<0.05). The same as below.
项目 Items | 对照组 Control group | 试验Ⅰ组 Trial group Ⅰ | 试验Ⅱ组 Trial group Ⅱ | P值P value | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
处理 Treatment | 线性 Linear | 二次 Quadratic | ||||
干物质DM/% | 60.16±3.77 b | 67.39±3.01 a | 67.76±1.67 a | 0.033 | 0.020 | 0.150 |
中性洗涤纤维NDF/% | 53.65±2.91 | 55.77±1.84 | 54.73±2.27 | 0.581 | 0.599 | 0.384 |
酸性洗涤纤维ADF/% | 36.80±5.14 | 34.15±2.25 | 35.61±2.59 | 0.847 | 0.698 | 0.690 |
表2 单宁对育肥滩羊养分表观消化率的影响
Table 2 Effect of tannin on apparent digestibility of nutrients in Tan sheep
项目 Items | 对照组 Control group | 试验Ⅰ组 Trial group Ⅰ | 试验Ⅱ组 Trial group Ⅱ | P值P value | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
处理 Treatment | 线性 Linear | 二次 Quadratic | ||||
干物质DM/% | 60.16±3.77 b | 67.39±3.01 a | 67.76±1.67 a | 0.033 | 0.020 | 0.150 |
中性洗涤纤维NDF/% | 53.65±2.91 | 55.77±1.84 | 54.73±2.27 | 0.581 | 0.599 | 0.384 |
酸性洗涤纤维ADF/% | 36.80±5.14 | 34.15±2.25 | 35.61±2.59 | 0.847 | 0.698 | 0.690 |
项目 Items | 对照组 Control group | 试验Ⅰ组 Trial group Ⅰ | 试验Ⅱ组 Trial group Ⅱ | P值P value | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
处理 Treatment | 线性 Linear | 二次 Quadratic | ||||
氮摄入量Nitrogen intake/(g·d-1) | 18.52±0.37 B | 20.94±0.24 A | 21.33±0.12 A | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.002 |
尿氮Urine nitrogen/(g·d-1) | 1.87±0.11 | 1.83±0.15 | 1.85±0.05 | 0.947 | 0.861 | 0.792 |
粪氮Fecal nitrogen/(g·d-1) | 6.94±0.34 | 6.95±0.65 | 7.05±0.34 | 0.956 | 0.796 | 0.896 |
总排出氮Total excreted nitrogen/(g·d-1) | 8.81±0.30 | 8.78±0.56 | 8.90±0.39 | 0.945 | 0.819 | 0.820 |
沉积氮Deposited nitrogen/(g·d-1) | 9.71±0.19 b | 12.16±0.67 a | 12.43±0.40 a | 0.001 | <0.001 | 0.016 |
氮表观消化率 | 62.53±1.13 | 66.81±3.18 | 66.96±1.60 | 0.076 | 0.046 | 0.225 |
Apparent nitrogen digestibility/% | ||||||
氮沉积率Nitrogen deposition rate/% | 52.43±0.90 b | 58.04±2.82 a | 58.28±1.80 a | 0.019 | 0.012 | 0.107 |
表3 单宁对育肥滩羊氮代谢的影响
Table 3 Effect of tannin on nitrogen metabolism in fattening Tan sheep
项目 Items | 对照组 Control group | 试验Ⅰ组 Trial group Ⅰ | 试验Ⅱ组 Trial group Ⅱ | P值P value | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
处理 Treatment | 线性 Linear | 二次 Quadratic | ||||
氮摄入量Nitrogen intake/(g·d-1) | 18.52±0.37 B | 20.94±0.24 A | 21.33±0.12 A | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.002 |
尿氮Urine nitrogen/(g·d-1) | 1.87±0.11 | 1.83±0.15 | 1.85±0.05 | 0.947 | 0.861 | 0.792 |
粪氮Fecal nitrogen/(g·d-1) | 6.94±0.34 | 6.95±0.65 | 7.05±0.34 | 0.956 | 0.796 | 0.896 |
总排出氮Total excreted nitrogen/(g·d-1) | 8.81±0.30 | 8.78±0.56 | 8.90±0.39 | 0.945 | 0.819 | 0.820 |
沉积氮Deposited nitrogen/(g·d-1) | 9.71±0.19 b | 12.16±0.67 a | 12.43±0.40 a | 0.001 | <0.001 | 0.016 |
氮表观消化率 | 62.53±1.13 | 66.81±3.18 | 66.96±1.60 | 0.076 | 0.046 | 0.225 |
Apparent nitrogen digestibility/% | ||||||
氮沉积率Nitrogen deposition rate/% | 52.43±0.90 b | 58.04±2.82 a | 58.28±1.80 a | 0.019 | 0.012 | 0.107 |
项目 Items | 对照组 Control group | 试验Ⅰ组 Trial group Ⅰ | 试验Ⅱ组 Trial group Ⅱ | P值P value | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
处理 Treatment | 线性 Linear | 二次 Quadratic | ||||
食入总能General energy intake/(MJ·d-1) | 13.70±0.38 B | 15.71±0.36 A | 16.07±0.30 A | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.004 |
粪能Fecal energy/(MJ·d-1) | 5.49±0.29 | 5.15±0.69 | 5.05±0.10 | 0.490 | 0.271 | 0.719 |
尿能Urinary energy/(MJ·d-1) | 2.51±0.29 | 2.47±0.34 | 2.40±0.33 | 0.920 | 0.699 | 0.955 |
消化能Digestible energy/(MJ·d-1) | 8.22±0.28 B | 10.56±0.70 A | 11.02±0.10 A | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.023 |
总能表观消化率 | 59.96±2.08 b | 67.22±4.42 a | 68.56±0.60 a | 0.021 | 0.010 | 0.191 |
Apparent digestibility of general energy/% |
表4 单宁对育肥滩羊能量代谢的影响
Table 4 Effect of tannin on energy metabolism of fattening Tan sheep
项目 Items | 对照组 Control group | 试验Ⅰ组 Trial group Ⅰ | 试验Ⅱ组 Trial group Ⅱ | P值P value | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
处理 Treatment | 线性 Linear | 二次 Quadratic | ||||
食入总能General energy intake/(MJ·d-1) | 13.70±0.38 B | 15.71±0.36 A | 16.07±0.30 A | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.004 |
粪能Fecal energy/(MJ·d-1) | 5.49±0.29 | 5.15±0.69 | 5.05±0.10 | 0.490 | 0.271 | 0.719 |
尿能Urinary energy/(MJ·d-1) | 2.51±0.29 | 2.47±0.34 | 2.40±0.33 | 0.920 | 0.699 | 0.955 |
消化能Digestible energy/(MJ·d-1) | 8.22±0.28 B | 10.56±0.70 A | 11.02±0.10 A | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.023 |
总能表观消化率 | 59.96±2.08 b | 67.22±4.42 a | 68.56±0.60 a | 0.021 | 0.010 | 0.191 |
Apparent digestibility of general energy/% |
项目 Items | 对照组 Control group | 试验Ⅰ组 Trial group Ⅰ | 试验Ⅱ组 Trial group Ⅱ | P值P value | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
处理 Treatment | 线性 Linear | 二次 Quadratic | ||||
宰前活重Pre-slaughter live weight/kg | 22.96±1.16 b | 24.78±1.72 a | 25.39±0.76 a | 0.027 | 0.011 | 0.403 |
胴体重Carcass weight/kg | 11.15±0.57 b | 12.34±0.92 a | 12.54±0.57 a | 0.018 | 0.009 | 0.224 |
净肉重Net meat weight/kg | 9.04±0.41 b | 10.09±0.80 a | 10.24±0.55 a | 0.017 | 0.009 | 0.196 |
骨重Bone weight/kg | 2.11±0.19 | 2.25±0.15 | 2.30±0.06 | 0.143 | 0.059 | 0.630 |
GR值GR value/mm | 11.44±0.84 | 11.83±1.74 | 12.89±1.67 | 0.308 | 0.145 | 0.684 |
骨肉比Flesh and bone ratio | 0.23±0.01 | 0.22±0.01 | 0.23±0.01 | 0.595 | 0.048 | 0.484 |
屠宰率Slaughter rate/% | 48.80±1.09 | 49.80±1.48 | 49.40±1.14 | 0.468 | 0.463 | 0.327 |
胴体净肉率Net carcass meat rate/% | 81.00±1.00 | 82.00±0.71 | 81.40±0.55 | 0.164 | 0.430 | 0.084 |
眼肌面积Eye muscle area/cm2 | 11.30±0.61 b | 12.63±0.42 a | 12.85±0.59 a | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.091 |
表5 单宁对育肥滩羊屠宰性能的影响
Table 5 Effect of tannin on slaughter performance of fattening Tan sheep
项目 Items | 对照组 Control group | 试验Ⅰ组 Trial group Ⅰ | 试验Ⅱ组 Trial group Ⅱ | P值P value | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
处理 Treatment | 线性 Linear | 二次 Quadratic | ||||
宰前活重Pre-slaughter live weight/kg | 22.96±1.16 b | 24.78±1.72 a | 25.39±0.76 a | 0.027 | 0.011 | 0.403 |
胴体重Carcass weight/kg | 11.15±0.57 b | 12.34±0.92 a | 12.54±0.57 a | 0.018 | 0.009 | 0.224 |
净肉重Net meat weight/kg | 9.04±0.41 b | 10.09±0.80 a | 10.24±0.55 a | 0.017 | 0.009 | 0.196 |
骨重Bone weight/kg | 2.11±0.19 | 2.25±0.15 | 2.30±0.06 | 0.143 | 0.059 | 0.630 |
GR值GR value/mm | 11.44±0.84 | 11.83±1.74 | 12.89±1.67 | 0.308 | 0.145 | 0.684 |
骨肉比Flesh and bone ratio | 0.23±0.01 | 0.22±0.01 | 0.23±0.01 | 0.595 | 0.048 | 0.484 |
屠宰率Slaughter rate/% | 48.80±1.09 | 49.80±1.48 | 49.40±1.14 | 0.468 | 0.463 | 0.327 |
胴体净肉率Net carcass meat rate/% | 81.00±1.00 | 82.00±0.71 | 81.40±0.55 | 0.164 | 0.430 | 0.084 |
眼肌面积Eye muscle area/cm2 | 11.30±0.61 b | 12.63±0.42 a | 12.85±0.59 a | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.091 |
[1] | LONG R J, APORI S O, CASTRO F B, et al. Feed value of native forages of the Tibetan Plateau of China[J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 1999, 80(2): 101-113. |
[2] | NOOROLAHI Z, SAHARI M A, BARZEGAR M, et al. Tannin fraction of pistachio green hull extract with pancreatic lipase inhibitory and antioxidant activity[J]. Journal of Food Biochemistry, 2020, 44(6): e13208. |
[3] | GONTIJO D C, GONTIJO P C, BRANDÃO G C, et al. Antioxidant study indicative of antibacterial and antimutagenic activities of an ellagitannin-rich aqueous extract from the leaves of Miconia latecrenata[J]. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 2019, 236: 114-123. |
[4] | SONG D, ZHAO J B, DENG W X, et al. Tannic acid inhibits NLRP3 inflammasome-mediated IL-1β production via blocking NF-κB signaling in macrophages[J]. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 2018, 503(4): 3078-3085. |
[5] | PONG L Y, YEW P N, LEE W L, et al. Anti-dengue virus serotype 2 activity of tannins from porcupine dates[J]. Chinese Medicine, 2020, 15: 49. |
[6] | 高章远致, 李国浩, 郭凡, 等. 五倍子单宁酸体外诱导人膀胱癌EJ细胞凋亡及机制研究[J]. 湖北中医药大学学报, 2021, 23(5): 5-8. |
GAO Z, LI G H, GUO F, et al. Mechanism study of tannin acid induces apoptosis of human bladder cancer EJ cells in vitro[J]. Journal of Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, 2021, 23(5): 5-8. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[7] | CHANG Z H, JIAN P, ZHANG Q N, et al. Tannins in Terminalia bellirica inhibit hepatocellular carcinoma growth by regulating EGFR-signaling and tumor immunity[J]. Food & Function, 2021, 12(8): 3720-3739. |
[8] | ODAI T, TERAUCHI M, KATO K, et al. Effects of grape seed proanthocyanidin extract on vascular endothelial function in participants with prehypertension: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study[J]. Nutrients, 2019, 11(12): 2844. |
[9] | ISHLAK A, GÜNAL M, ABUGHAZALEH A A. The effects of cinnamaldehyde, monensin and quebracho condensed tannin on rumen fermentation, biohydrogenation and bacteria in continuous culture system[J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2015, 207: 31-40. |
[10] | YU F, BARRY T N, MCNABB W C, et al. Effect of bound condensed tannin from cottonseed uponin situ protein solubility and dry matter digestion in the rumen[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 1995, 69(3): 311-319. |
[11] | MANCINI S, MINIERI S, BUCCIONI A, et al. The influence of dietary chestnut and quebracho tannins mix on rabbit meat quality[J]. Animal Science Journal=Nihon Chikusan Gakkaiho, 2019, 90(5): 680-689. |
[12] | 薛树媛. 灌木类植物单宁对绵羊瘤胃发酵影响及其对瘤胃微生物区系、免疫和生产指标影响的研究[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2011. |
XUE S Y. The effect of shrub tannin on rumen fermentation and rumen microflora, immunity and production performance in sheep[D]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2011. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[13] | 刘绘汇, 孙康, 范慧玉, 等. 代乳粉中添加单宁酸对湖羊羔羊生长性能、养分表观消化率和肌肉脂肪酸组成的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2021, 33(8): 4520-4532. |
LIU H H, SUN K, FAN H Y, et al. Effects of tannic acid addition in milk replacer on growth performance, nutrient apparent digestibility and muscle fatty acid composition of hu lambs[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2021, 33(8): 4520-4532. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[14] | SARNATARO C, SPANGHERO M. In vitro rumen fermentation of feed substrates added with chestnut tannins or an extract from Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni[J]. Animal Nutrition, 2020, 6(1): 54-60. |
[15] | ABOAGYE I A, OBA M, KOENIG K M, et al. Use of Gallic acid and hydrolyzable tannins to reduce methane emission and nitrogen excretion in beef cattle fed a diet containing alfalfa silage1, 2[J]. Journal of Animal Science, 2019, 97(5): 2230-2244. |
[16] | BONELLI F, TURINI L, SARRI G, et al. Oral administration of chestnut tannins to reduce the duration of neonatal calf diarrhea[J]. BMC Veterinary Research, 2018, 14(1): 227. |
[17] | DOS SANTOS S K, DE FÁTIMA FRANÇA BIZ J, SALGADO J A, et al. Intake and performance of growing lambs supplemented with quebracho tannins[J]. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 2022, 54(1): 71. |
[18] | 周俊华, 何仁春, 周志扬, 等. 缩合单宁对努比亚山羊生长性能、瘤胃液中挥发性脂肪酸含量及细菌菌群的影响[J]. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2021(18): 109-114, 153. |
ZHOU J H, HE R C, ZHOU Z Y, et al. Effects of condensed tannin on growth performance, volatile fatty acid contents and bacterial flora in rumen fluid of Nubian goats[J]. Heilongjiang Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, 2021(18): 109-114, 153. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[19] | 肖杰, 孙攀峰, 李鹏伟, 等. 饲粮中添加单宁和纤维素酶对育肥湖羊生长性能、营养物质消化率及肠道形态的影响[J]. 中国饲料, 2020(8): 33-36. |
XIAO J, SUN P F, LI P W, et al. Effects of tannins and cellulase on growth performance, nutrients digestibility and intestinal morphology of Hu sheep[J]. China Feed, 2020(8): 33-36. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[20] | 丁鑫. 不同栗木单宁水平日粮对湖羊公羔生产性能和肉品质的影响[D]. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2019. |
DING X. Effects of different chestnut tannin levels on the production performance and meat quality of hu lambs[D]. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University, 2019. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[21] | 解湧芳, 李大彪, 牛晓雨, 等. 单宁对绵羊抗氧化能力及免疫性能的影响[J]. 中国畜牧杂志, 2022, 58(3): 185-190. |
XIE Y F, LI D B, NIU X Y, et al. Effects of tannin on antioxidant capacity and immune performance of sheep[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2022, 58(3): 185-190. (in Chinese) | |
[22] | 从光雷, 肖蕴祺, 张倩雲, 等. 饲粮添加化香果单宁对肉鸡免疫器官指数、血浆抗氧化和生化指标及盲肠微生物区系的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2021, 33(12): 6802-6812. |
CONG G L, XIAO Y Q, ZHANG Q Y, et al. Effects of dietary plotytarya strohilacea sieb. et zuce tannin on immune organ indexes, plasma antioxidant and biochemical indexes and cecal microflora of broilers[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2021, 33(12): 6802-6812. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[23] | 张振东, 刘婷, 范慧玉, 等. 单宁酸对湖羊瘤胃动态发酵和血清抗氧化能力的影响[J]. 饲料工业, 2022, 43(18): 44-49. |
ZHANG Z D, LIU T, FAN H Y, et al. Effects of dietary tannic acid on rumen dynamic fermentation and serum antioxidant capacity of hu sheep[J]. Feed Industry, 2022, 43(18): 44-49. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[24] | DENTINHO M T P, BELO A T, BESSA R J B. Digestion, ruminal fermentation and microbial nitrogen supply in sheep fed soybean meal treated with Cistus ladanifer L. tannins[J]. Small Ruminant Research, 2014, 119(1/2/3): 57-64. |
[25] | ADEJORO F A, HASSEN A, AKANMU A M. Effect of lipid-encapsulated Acacia tannin extract on feed intake, nutrient digestibility and methane emission in sheep[J]. Animals: an Open Access Journal from MDPI, 2019, 9(11): 863. |
[26] | MCSWEENEY C S, PALMER B, MCNEILL D M, et al. Microbial interactions with tannins: nutritional consequences for ruminants[J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2001, 91(1/2): 83-93. |
[27] | KU-VERA J C, JIMÉNEZ-OCAMPO R, VALENCIA-SALAZAR S S, et al. Role of secondary plant metabolites on enteric methane mitigation in ruminants[J]. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 2020, 7: 584. |
[28] | ZHAO M D, DI L F, TANG Z Y, et al. Effect of tannins and cellulase on growth performance, nutrients digestibility, blood profiles, intestinal morphology and carcass characteristics in Hu sheep[J]. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2019, 32(10): 1540-1547. |
[29] | BRUS M, GRADIŠNIK L, TRAPECAR M, et al. Beneficial effects of water-soluble chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) tannin extract on chicken small intestinal epithelial cell culture[J]. Poultry Science, 2018, 97(4): 1271-1282. |
[30] | PATHAK A K, DUTTA N, PATTANAIK A K, et al. Effect of condensed tannins from Ficus infectoria and Psidium guajava leaf meal mixture on nutrient metabolism, methane emission and performance of lambs[J]. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2017, 30(12): 1702-1710. |
[31] | 张晓庆, 李勇, 李发弟, 等. 红豆草单宁含量对绵羊养分消化率及氮利用的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2009, 40(3): 356-362. |
ZHANG X Q, LI Y, LI F D, et al. Effects of tannin content in sainfoin(Onobrychis viciifolia)hay on digestibility of nutrients and utilization of nitrogen in sheep diets[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 2009, 40(3): 356-362. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[32] | 潘发明, 王彩莲, 刁其玉, 等. 单宁酸对绵羊日粮养分消化利用及氮代谢的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2017, 26(12): 179-185. |
PAN F M, WANG C L, DIAO Q Y, et al. Effects of tannic acid on digestion and utilization of nutrients and the metabolic parameters of nitrogen in sheep[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2017, 26(12): 179-185. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[33] | ABDULLAH M A M, FARGHALY M M, YOUSSEF I M I. Effect of feeding Acacia nilotica pods to sheep on nutrient digestibility, nitrogen balance, ruminal protozoa and rumen enzymes activity[J]. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 2018, 102(3): 662-669. |
[34] | 解湧芳, 朱寿谦, 王敬尧, 等. 饲粮中不同水平单宁对绵羊氮代谢及生长性能的影响[J]. 饲料研究, 2020, 43(11): 1-5. |
XIE Y F, ZHU S Q, WANG J Y, et al. Effect of different levels of tannin in diet on nitrogen metabolism and growth performance of sheep[J]. Feed Research, 2020, 43(11): 1-5. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[35] | SAYD T, CHAMBON C, POPOVA M, et al. Impact of tannin supplementation on proteolysis during post-ruminal digestion in wethers using a dynamic in vitro system: a plant (Medicago sativa) digestomic approach[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2022, 70(7): 2221-2230. |
[36] | 李庆敏, 焦娜, 周玉香, 等. 颗粒型全混合日粮中添加枸杞渣对育肥滩羊生长性能、消化代谢、抗氧化能力和免疫功能的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2022, 34(7): 4572-4584. |
LI Q M, JIAO N, ZHOU Y X, et al. Effects of granular total mixed ration with Lycium barbarum dregs on growth performance, digestion and metabolism, antioxidant capacity and immune function of fattening Tan sheep[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2022, 34(7): 4572-4584. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[37] | 赵栋, 郑琛, 李发弟, 等. 葡萄渣单宁对绵羊养分消化代谢及瘤胃发酵的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2014, 23(4): 285-292. |
ZHAO D, ZHENG C, LI F D, et al. Effects of tannins from grape pomace on digestibility, metabolism and rumen fermentation in Sheep[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2014, 23(4): 285-292. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[38] | 彭婉婉, 许贵善, 马忠杰, 等. 日粮中不同葡萄籽添加比例对多浪羊营养物质消化代谢的影响[J]. 饲料工业, 2021, 42(3): 43-48. |
PENG W W, XU G S, MA Z J, et al. Effects of different proportions of grape seed on nutrient digestibility of Duolang in sheep diet[J]. Feed Industry, 2021, 42(3): 43-48. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[39] | SINZ S, LEPARMARAI P T, LIESEGANG A, et al. Effects of dietary grapeseed extract on performance, energy and nitrogen balance as well as methane and nitrogen losses of lambs and goat kids[J]. The British Journal of Nutrition, 2021, 125(1): 26-37. |
[40] | ORZUNA-ORZUNA J F, DORANTES-ITURBIDE G, LARA-BUENO A, et al. Growth performance, meat quality and antioxidant status of sheep supplemented with tannins: a meta-analysis[J]. Animals: an Open Access Journal from MDPI, 2021, 11(11): 3184. |
[41] | 赵梦迪, 邸凌峰, 唐泽宇, 等. 单宁与饲用纤维素酶对湖羊生长性能、血液生化指标、屠宰性能及器官发育的影响[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2019, 46(6): 1668-1676. |
ZHAO M D, DI L F, TANG Z Y, et al. Effects of dietary tannin and forage cellulose on growth performance, blood biochemical parameters, slaughter performance and organ development of hu sheep[J]. China Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine, 2019, 46(6): 1668-1676. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 张宁, 陶荣浩, 刘佩诗, 胡含秀, 高琳琳, 郭龙, 祝尊友, 马友华. 不同种类有机肥配施化肥对茶叶生长、品质和土壤肥力的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(8): 1844-1852. |
[2] | 陆兰菲, 赵学平, 马正, 方楠, 骆玉琴, 王晓梅, 叶会, 雷圆, 王强, 张昌朋. 固相萃取-高效液相色谱-质谱联用法测定铁皮石斛中2,4-表芸苔素内酯残留[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(8): 1896-1903. |
[3] | 雷联. 膜下滴灌调亏对制种玉米植株生长、产量和水分利用的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(7): 1542-1549. |
[4] | 朱燕, 魏佳, 许自龙, 林天宝, 杨升, 刘岩, 吕志强, 刘培刚. 促生长植物激素对桑树叶片衰老过程生理生化指标的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(6): 1278-1285. |
[5] | 檀舒霞, 赵桃弟, 杨豪, 宁可君, 刘丽, 何庆元, 黄守程, 舒英杰. 遮阴对10个菜用大豆品种农艺性状、产量和硝态氮代谢的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(4): 729-735. |
[6] | 夏伦斌, 马龙龙, 乔德亮, 何燕飞, 蒋平. 三角帆蚌多糖对肉仔鸡生长性能、抗氧化及免疫功能的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(3): 547-555. |
[7] | 陈大刚, 徐开未, 彭丹丹, 游浩宇, 杨然, 廖慧苹, 陈远学. 不同水分处理对基质栽培对萼猕猴桃幼苗生长及养分吸收的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(12): 2854-2864. |
[8] | 李虹仪, 周润盛, 梁笑玲, 张楚玥, 吕祺欣, 杨长华, 张茂. 日粮钙磷水平对马岗鹅生长性能及肝脏基因表达的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(11): 2533-2542. |
[9] | 彭丹丹, 陈大刚, 徐开未, 游浩宇, 杨然, 廖慧苹, 陈远学. 椰糠复合基质对猕猴桃砧木幼苗生长及根系特征的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(10): 2364-2377. |
[10] | 许申平, 袁秀云, 张燕, 梁芳, 蒋素华, 牛苏燕, 崔波. 温度与光照强度对蝴蝶兰光合生理与花序发育的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(10): 2389-2397. |
[11] | 尤翠翠, 贺一哲, 徐鹏, 黄亚茹, 王辉, 何海兵, 柯健, 武立权. 高温胁迫对水稻生长发育的伤害效应及其防御对策[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(1): 10-22. |
[12] | 杨胜玲, 黄兴成, 李渝, 刘彦伶, 张雅蓉, 张艳, 张文安, 蒋太明. 长期有机无机肥配施对水稻生长、干物质积累及产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(9): 1815-1825. |
[13] | 李春梅, 万小荣, 关子盈, 赖晓凤, 罗凯晴, 刘凯. 长链非编码RNA调控植物生长发育与逆境胁迫响应研究进展[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(9): 2066-2076. |
[14] | 李旺雄, 张洋, 唐中祺, 郁继华. 平衡施肥对设施基质栽培番茄生长、品质、矿质元素含量与产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(8): 1648-1660. |
[15] | 王峰, 刘海天, 俞巧钢, 叶静, 何新华, 周杨, 马军伟. 高产和常规黄花菜品种的干物质和养分积累特性[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(8): 1669-1678. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||