麦秸行间集覆还田下控释氮肥减施对水稻产量、品质与氮肥利用率的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20231437

浙江农业学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (1): 1-13.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20231437

麦秸行间集覆还田下控释氮肥减施对水稻产量、品质与氮肥利用率的影响

韩笑(), 刘旭杰, 石吕, 张晋, 单海勇, 石晓旭, 严旖旎, 刘建, 薛亚光^*()

江苏沿江地区农业科学研究所,南通市循环农业重点实验室,江苏南通 226001

收稿日期:2023-12-22 出版日期:2025-01-25 发布日期:2025-02-14
作者简介:韩笑(1995—),女,江苏南通人,硕士,助理研究员,主要从事作物栽培学与耕作学研究。E-mail:958355386@qq.com
通讯作者: *薛亚光,E-mail:xiaoqiyaguang@126.com
基金资助:
南通市科技计划项目(MS22022095);国家重点研发计划(2016YFD0300903-02)

Effects of reduced application of controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer on rice yield, quality and nitrogen fertilizer utilization efficiency under concentrated coverage of wheat straw between rows for returning to field

HAN Xiao(), LIU Xujie, SHI Lyu, ZHANG Jin, SHAN Haiyong, SHI Xiaoxu, YAN Yini, LIU Jian, XUE Yaguang^*()

Nantong Key Laboratory of Recycling Agriculture of Nantong City, Jiangsu Yanjiang Area Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Nantong 226001, Jiangsu, China

Received:2023-12-22 Online:2025-01-25 Published:2025-02-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为探究麦秸行间集覆还田下氮肥减施对水稻产量、品质和氮肥利用率的影响,以长江中下游地区大面积种植的南粳9108和南粳5055为材料,等行距移栽下设置2种氮肥处理模式,即不施氮(T1)和当地习惯施氮量(速效氮肥,T2),在麦秸行间集覆还田宽窄行移栽下设置4种施肥模式,即当地习惯施氮量(速效氮肥,T3)、减氮10%(控释氮肥与速效氮肥配施,T4)、减氮20%(控释氮肥与速效氮肥配施,T5)、减氮30%(控释氮肥与速效氮肥配施,T6)。结果表明,宽窄行移栽较等行距移栽提高水稻产量,两个品种平均增产3.30%。相同移栽方式下,减氮10%会使两个品种水稻的有效穗数显著(P<0.05)降低,但仍能维持较高的产量;减氮20%~30%条件下,水稻产量能够稳定在江苏省内平均单产水平。减氮10%~20%能够改善稻米的外观品质。南粳9108和南粳5055分别在减氮30%和减氮10%~20%处理下有最高的食味值。氮肥减量下,两个品种水稻的氮肥吸收利用率均有所提高,南粳9108和南粳5055分别在减氮20%和减氮10%处理下氮肥吸收利用率最高。综上,麦秸行间集覆还田下,控释氮肥与尿素配施并减少10%~20%的施氮量能够获得较高的氮素吸收利用率和较优的稻米品质,同时实现减氮稳产和提质增效的目标。

关键词: 麦秸行间集覆还田, 氮肥减施, 水稻, 产量, 品质, 氮肥利用率

Abstract:

In order to investigate the effects of nitrogen fertilizer reduction on rice yield, quality, and nitrogen fertilizer utilization efficiency under the concentrated coverage of wheat straw betweem rows for returning to the field, rice varieties of Nanjing 9108 and Nanjing 5055, which were widely planted in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River, were used as test materials in the present study. Two nitrogen fertilizer treatments were set up under equal row spacing transplantation, namely, no nitrogen application (T1) and local customary nitrogen application rate (quick acting nitrogen fertilizer, T2). Four fertilization treatments were set up under the concentrated coverage of wheat straw between rows for returning to the field and the transplanting of wide and narrow rows, namely, local customary nitrogen application rate (quick acting nitrogen fertilizer, T3), nitrogen reduction rate of 10% (combination of controlled release nitrogen fertilizer and quick acting nitrogen fertilizer, T4), nitrogen reduction rate of 20% (combination of controlled release nitrogen fertilizer and quick acting nitrogen fertilizer, T5), and nitrogen reduction rate of 30% (combination of controlled release nitrogen fertilizer and quick acting nitrogen fertilizer, T6). The results showed that the transplanting of wide and narrow rows could increase rice yield compared to the transplanting with equal row spacing, with an average yield increase of 3.30% for both varieties. Under the same transplanting mode, reducing nitrogen by 10% significantly (P<0.05) reduced the effective panicles, yet maintained high yield. Reducing nitrogen by 20%-30% could stabilize the rice yield at the average level of Jiangsu Province. Reducing nitrogen by 10%-20% could improve the appearance quality of rice. Nanjing 9108 and Nanjing 5055 got the highest taste value with the nitrogen reduciton rate of 30% and 10%-20%, respectively. The reduction of nitrogen rate resulted in an increase in the recovery efficiency of nitrogen (RE_N) of both rice varieties. The highest RE_N for Nanjing 9108 and Nanjing 5055 was found with the nitrogen reduction rate of 20% and 10%, respectively. In summary, under the concentrated coverage of wheat straw between rows for returning to the field, combined application of controlled release nitrogen fertilizer and urea, with the nitrogen reduction rate of 10% to 20% as compared with the local customary rate could achieve higher nitrogen absorption and utilization efficiency and better rice quality, hence realize the goals of reducing nitrogen, stabilizing yield, and improving quality and efficiency.

Key words: concentrated coverage of wheat straw between rows for returning to the field, reduction of nitrogen fertilizer, rice, yield, quality, nitrogen fertilizer utilization rate

中图分类号:

S511

韩笑, 刘旭杰, 石吕, 张晋, 单海勇, 石晓旭, 严旖旎, 刘建, 薛亚光. 麦秸行间集覆还田下控释氮肥减施对水稻产量、品质与氮肥利用率的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(1): 1-13.

HAN Xiao, LIU Xujie, SHI Lyu, ZHANG Jin, SHAN Haiyong, SHI Xiaoxu, YAN Yini, LIU Jian, XUE Yaguang. Effects of reduced application of controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer on rice yield, quality and nitrogen fertilizer utilization efficiency under concentrated coverage of wheat straw between rows for returning to field[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(1): 1-13.

图/表 9

参考文献 42

[1]	郭俊杰, 柴以潇, 李玲, 等. 江苏省水稻减肥增产的潜力与机制分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(5): 849-859.
	GUO J J, CHAI Y X, LI L, et al. The potential and related mechanisms of increasing rice yield by reducing chemical nitrogen application in Jiangsu Province[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(5): 849-859. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]	张智, 王伟妮, 李昆, 等. 四川省不同区域水稻氮肥施用效果研究[J]. 土壤学报, 2015, 52(1): 234-241.
	ZHANG Z, WANG W N, LI K, et al. Effects of nitrogen fertilization on rice in different regions of Sichuan Province[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2015, 52(1): 234-241. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]	CHENG B, JIANG Y, CAO C G. Balance rice yield and eating quality by changing the traditional nitrogen management for sustainable production in China[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 312: 127793.
[4]	巨晓棠, 谷保静. 我国农田氮肥施用现状、问题及趋势[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2014, 20(4): 783-795.
	JU X T, GU B J. Status-quo,problem and trend of nitrogen fertilization in China[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2014, 20(4): 783-795. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]	刘红江, 郑建初, 郭智, 等. 太湖地区氮肥减量对水稻氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2016, 35(11): 2960-2965.
	LIU H J, ZHENG J C, GUO Z, et al. Effects of reduced nitrogen application on nitrogen uptake and use efficiency of rice in Taihu Area[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2016, 35(11): 2960-2965. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]	HUSSAIN S, PENG S B, FAHAD S, et al. Rice management interventions to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions: a review[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 2015, 22(5): 3342-3360.
[7]	TAYEFEH M, SADEGHI S M, NOORHOSSEINI S A, et al. Environmental impact of rice production based on nitrogen fertilizer use[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 2018, 25(16): 15885-15895.
[8]	丁周宇, 张娜, 舒小伟, 等. 栽培措施对水稻氮素吸收利用及稻田尾水氮磷含量的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2023, 42(9): 2004-2015.
	DING Z Y, ZHANG N, SHU X W, et al. Effects of cultivation practices on nitrogen absorption and utilization of rice and nitrogen and phosphorus contents of paddy tailwater[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2023, 42(9): 2004-2015. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	孙会峰, 周胜, 付子轼, 等. 秸秆与缓释肥配施对水稻产量及氮素吸收利用率的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2015, 21(4): 95-98.
	SUN H F, ZHOU S, FU Z S, et al. Effects of application of controlled-release fertilizer combined with wheat straw on rice yield and nitrogen use efficiency[J]. China Rice, 2015, 21(4): 95-98. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]	金树权, 陈若霞, 汪峰, 等. 不同氮肥运筹模式对稻田田面水氮浓度和水稻产量的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020, 34(1): 242-248.
	JIN S Q, CHEN R X, WANG F, et al. Effects of different nitrogen fertilizer application modes on the variation of nitrogen concentration in paddy field surface water and the yield of rice[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 34(1): 242-248. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]	陈贵, 鲁晨妮, 石艳平, 等. 不同缓控释肥搭配脲铵对水稻产量、氮素利用效率和土壤养分的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(1): 122-130.
	CHEN G, LU C N, SHI Y P, et al. Effect of different controlled-release fertilizers with urea ammonium on yield, nitrogen use efficiency and soil nutrients of rice[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(1): 122-130. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]	蒋曦龙, 陈宝成, 张民, 等. 控释肥氮素释放与水稻氮素吸收相关性研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2014, 28(1): 215-220.
	JIANG X L, CHEN B C, ZHANG M, et al. Study on the correlation between nitrogen release dynamics of controlled-release fertilizer and nitrogen uptake of the rice[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2014, 28(1): 215-220. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]	魏海燕, 李宏亮, 程金秋, 等. 缓释肥类型与运筹对不同穗型水稻产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(5): 730-740.
	WEI H Y, LI H L, CHENG J Q, et al. Effects of slow/controlled release fertilizer types and their application regime on yield in rice with different types of panicle[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2017, 43(5): 730-740. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]	李敏, 郭熙盛, 叶舒娅, 等. 硫膜和树脂膜控释尿素对水稻产量、光合特性及氮肥利用率的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013, 19(4): 808-815.
	LI M, GUO X S, YE S Y, et al. Effects of sulfur-and polymer-coated controlled release urea on yield, photosynthetic characteristics and nitrogen fertilizer efficiency of rice[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2013, 19(4): 808-815. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]	程金秋. 缓控释肥类型及运筹对早熟晚粳水稻产量及稻米品质的影响[D]. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2018.
	CHENG J Q. Effects of slow-controlled release fertilizer types and their fertilization methods on the formation of yield and quality in early ripen and late-season rice[D]. Yangzhou: Yangzhou University, 2018. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]	冯爱青, 张民, 李成亮, 等. 控释氮肥对土壤酶活性与土壤养分利用的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2014, 28(3): 177-184.
	FENG A Q, ZHANG M, LI C L, et al. Effects of controlled release nitrogen fertilizer on soil enzyme activities and soil nutrient utilization[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2014, 28(3): 177-184. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]	唐海浪, 程在全, 钟巧芳, 等. 水稻氮高效利用的研究进展[J]. 江西农业学报, 2021, 33(12): 34-41.
	TANG H L, CHENG Z Q, ZHONG Q F, et al. Research progress in high-efficiency utilization of nitrogen in rice[J]. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi, 2021, 33(12): 34-41. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]	解文孝, 李建国, 刘军, 等. 不同土壤背景下秸秆还田量对水稻产量构成及氮吸收利用的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2021(2): 248-255.
	XIE W X, LI J G, LIU J, et al. Effects of straw returning amounts on rice yield components and N uptake of different soil background[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2021(2): 248-255. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]	潘剑玲, 代万安, 尚占环, 等. 秸秆还田对土壤有机质和氮素有效性影响及机制研究进展[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2013, 21(5): 526-535.
	PAN J L, DAI W A, SHANG Z H, et al. Review of research progress on the influence and mechanism of field straw residue incorporation on soil organic matter and nitrogen availability[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2013, 21(5): 526-535. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]	韩上, 武际, 李敏, 等. 深耕结合秸秆还田提高作物产量并改善耕层薄化土壤理化性质[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26(2): 276-284.
	HAN S, WU J, LI M, et al. Deep tillage with straw returning increase crop yield and improve soil physicochemical properties under topsoil thinning treatment[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2020, 26(2): 276-284. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]	田超, 程爽, 邢志鹏, 等. 麦秸秆全量还田下耕整地方式对机插水稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2023, 39(15): 46-56.
	TIAN C, CHENG S, XING Z P, et al. Effects of wheat straw returning and land preparation on rice yield and quality under mechanical transplanting[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2023, 39(15): 46-56. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[22]	薛亚光, 石吕, 韩笑, 等. 不同机械耕播方式对稻茬小麦产量形成及经济效益的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2021, 49(22): 94-98.
	XUE Y G, SHI L, HAN X, et al. Influences of different mechanized tillage and sowing practices on yield formation and economic benefits of wheat after rice[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 49(22): 94-98. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]	石吕, 薛亚光, 魏亚凤, 等. 基于宽窄行种植模式下稻秸非均匀性覆盖对土壤特性及小麦产量的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2021, 35(7): 1668-1677.
	SHI L, XUE Y G, WEI Y F, et al. Effects of rice straw non-uniform mulch on soil characteristics and wheat yield based on wide-narrow row planting pattern[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 35(7): 1668-1677. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24]	宫亮, 金丹丹, 牛世伟, 等. 长期定位氮肥减施对水稻产量和氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2022, 28(3): 42-46.
	GONG L, JIN D D, NIU S W, et al. Effects of long-term position nitrogen fertilizer reduction on rice yield and nitrogen absorption and utilizationn[J]. China Rice, 2022, 28(3): 42-46. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25]	王雨桐. 缓释氮肥与速效氮肥配施减量对水稻生长的影响机制[D]. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2020.
	WANG Y T. The mechanism of effect of reduction and combination of slow-release nitrogen fertilizer and conventional nitrogen fertilizer on the rice growth[D]. Yangzhou: Yangzhou University, 2020. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26]	鲁艳红, 聂军, 廖育林, 等. 不同控释氮肥减量施用对双季水稻产量和氮素利用的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2016, 30(2): 155-161.
	LU Y H, NIE J, LIAO Y L, et al. Effects of application reduction of controlled release nitrogen fertilizer on yield of double cropping rice and nitrogen nutrient uptake[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2016, 30(2): 155-161. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[27]	刘红江, 郭智, 郑建初, 等. 太湖地区氮肥减量对水稻产量和氮素流失的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2017, 36(3): 713-718.
	LIU H J, GUO Z, ZHENG J C, et al. Effects of nitrogen reduction on rice yield and nitrogen loss in Taihu Area[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2017, 36(3): 713-718. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[28]	袁伟, 陈婉华, 王子阳, 等. 双季稻秸秆还田与减施氮肥对水稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2021, 43(4): 711-720.
	YUAN W, CHEN W H, WANG Z Y, et al. Effects of returning double-season rice straw to the field and reducing N-fertilizer on yield and quality of rice[J]. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis, 2021, 43(4): 711-720. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[29]	张小祥, 邵士梅, 赵步洪, 等. 氮肥减施模式对不同穗型迟熟中粳水稻产量及氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2022, 36(3): 278-294.
	ZHANG X X, SHAO S M, ZHAO B H, et al. Effects of nitrogen reduction model on yield and nitrogen absorption and utilization of late-maturing mid-japonica rice with different panicle types[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2022, 36(3): 278-294. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[30]	黄巧义, 唐拴虎, 张发宝, 等. 减氮配施控释尿素对水稻产量和氮肥利用的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2017, 25(6): 829-838.
	HUANG Q Y, TANG S H, ZHANG F B, et al. Effect of combined application of controlled-release urea and conventional urea under reduced N rate on yield and N utilization efficiency of rice[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2017, 25(6): 829-838. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[31]	晏军, 王伟义, 李斌, 等. 秸秆还田下化肥减施对苏北地区水稻产量与氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2021(5): 74-82.
	YAN J, WANG W Y, LI B, et al. Effects of straw returning and fertilizer reduction on rice yield, nitrogen uptake and utilization in northern Jiangsu[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2021(5): 74-82. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[32]	高福强, 张绍权. 水稻宽窄行栽培技术的研究与推广应用[J]. 中国稻米, 2018, 24(4): 22-23.
	GAO F Q, ZHANG S Q. Research and popularization of wide and narrow row spacing cultivation techniques for rice[J]. China Rice, 2018, 24(4): 22-23. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[33]	朱镇, 张亚东, 朱峰峰, 等. 氮肥运筹对南粳505稻米蒸煮食用品质相关理化指标的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2021, 49(8): 84-89.
	ZHU Z, ZHANG Y D, ZHU F F, et al. Impact of nitrogen fertilizer management on physicochemical indices related to cooking and eating qualities of japonica rice cultivar Nanjing 505[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 49(8): 84-89. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[34]	马群, 张洪程, 戴其根, 等. 生育类型与施氮水平对粳稻加工品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2009, 35(7): 1282-1289.
	MA Q, ZHANG H C, DAI Q G, et al. Effects of nitrogen application rate and growth-development type on milling quality in japonica rice[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2009, 35(7): 1282-1289. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[35]	魏海燕, 王亚江, 孟天瑶, 等. 机插超级粳稻产量、品质及氮肥利用率对氮肥的响应[J]. 应用生态学报, 2014, 25(2): 488-496.
	WEI H Y, WANG Y J, MENG T Y, et al. Response of yield, quality and nitrogen use efficiency to nitrogen fertilizer from mechanical transplanting super japonica rice[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2014, 25(2): 488-496. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[36]	张桂莲, 赵瑞, 刘逸童, 等. 施氮量对优质稻产量和稻米品质及氮素利用效率的影响[J]. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 45(3): 231-236.
	ZHANG G L, ZHAO R, LIU Y T, et al. Effect of different amount of nitrogen on the yield and the quality of high quality rice and its nitrogen utilization efficiency[J]. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University(Natural Sciences), 2019, 45(3): 231-236. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[37]	姚姝, 于新, 周丽慧, 等. 氮肥用量和播期对优良食味粳稻直链淀粉含量的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2016, 30(5): 532-540.
	YAO S, YU X, ZHOU L H, et al. Amylose content in good eating quality rice under different nitrogen rates and sowing dates[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2016, 30(5): 532-540. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[38]	张庆, 郭保卫, 胡雅杰, 等. 不同氮肥水平下优质高产软米粳稻的产量与品质差异[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2021, 35(6): 606-616.
	ZHANG Q, GUO B W, HU Y J, et al. Differences in yield and rice quality of soft japonica rice with high quality and high yield under different nitrogen levels[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2021, 35(6): 606-616. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[39]	柳瑞, ABDUL H, 李恩琳, 等. 减氮配施稻秆生物炭对稻田土壤养分及植株氮素吸收的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(7): 2381-2389.
	LIU R, ABDUL H, LI E L, et al. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer reduction and biochar application on paddy soil nutrient and nitrogen uptake of rice[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 31(7): 2381-2389. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[40]	蒋鹏, 徐富贤, 熊洪, 等. 两种产量水平下减量施氮对杂交中稻产量和氮肥利用率的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2020, 34(1): 147-156.
	JIANG P, XU F X, XIONG H, et al. Effect of reduced nitrogen application on grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency of hybrid mid-season rice under two yield levels[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 34(1): 147-156. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[41]	侯红乾, 黄永兰, 冀建华, 等. 缓/控释肥对双季稻产量和氮素利用率的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2016, 30(4): 389-396.
	HOU H Q, HUANG Y L, JI J H, et al. Effects of controlled-release fertilizer application on double cropping rice yield and nitrogen use efficiency[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2016, 30(4): 389-396. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[42]	李珣, 苗立新, 孙杰, 等. 氮肥运筹对北方超级稻水稻氮素利用率的影响[J]. 北方水稻, 2014, 44(5): 15-18.
	LI X, MIAO L X, SUN J, et al. Effect of N-management on the nitrogen using efficiency of north super rice[J]. North Rice, 2014, 44(5): 15-18. (in Chinese with English abstract)

品种 Variety	处理 Treatment	有效穗数 Effective panicles/ (10⁴ hm^-2)	每穗粒数 Spikelets per panicle	千粒重 1 000-grain weight/g	结实率 Seed setting rate/%	理论产量 Theoretical yield/(t·hm^-2)	实际产量 Measured yield/(t·hm^-2)	收获指数 Harvest index
南粳9108	T1	243.90 d	112.69 d	26.22 a	87.64 a	6.32 d	5.68 e	0.45 d
Nanjing 9108	T2	342.88 a	130.62 ab	25.54 b	84.63 b	9.68 ab	9.08 b	0.52 a
	T3	346.68 a	133.61 a	25.61 b	84.88 b	10.07 a	9.27 a	0.53 a
	T4	335.33 b	130.55 ab	25.73 b	85.83 ab	9.67 ab	8.92 b	0.51 b
	T5	325.45 c	128.05 bc	26.05 a	86.24 ab	9.37 bc	8.53 c	0.50 b
	T6	318.58 c	124.66 c	26.12 a	87.60 a	9.08 c	8.16 d	0.49 c
南粳5055	T1	241.72 d	111.38 d	25.60 a	87.05 a	6.00 e	5.40 e	0.47 d
Nanjing 5055	T2	349.66 ab	129.81 a	24.93 d	83.73 e	9.48 b	8.51 b	0.52 ab
	T3	354.46 a	129.46 a	24.95 d	84.41 d	9.66 a	8.90 a	0.53 a
	T4	343.36 b	128.72 a	25.04 cd	85.18 c	9.43 b	8.54 b	0.51 b
	T5	336.64 c	122.90 b	25.24 bc	85.47 bc	8.92 c	8.15 c	0.50 c
	T6	330.35 c	119.92 c	25.32 b	86.08 b	8.64 d	7.78 d	0.50 c

品种 Variety	处理 Treatment	有效穗数 Effective panicles/ (10⁴ hm^-2)	每穗粒数 Spikelets per panicle	千粒重 1 000-grain weight/g	结实率 Seed setting rate/%	理论产量 Theoretical yield/(t·hm^-2)	实际产量 Measured yield/(t·hm^-2)	收获指数 Harvest index
南粳9108	T1	243.90 d	112.69 d	26.22 a	87.64 a	6.32 d	5.68 e	0.45 d
Nanjing 9108	T2	342.88 a	130.62 ab	25.54 b	84.63 b	9.68 ab	9.08 b	0.52 a
	T3	346.68 a	133.61 a	25.61 b	84.88 b	10.07 a	9.27 a	0.53 a
	T4	335.33 b	130.55 ab	25.73 b	85.83 ab	9.67 ab	8.92 b	0.51 b
	T5	325.45 c	128.05 bc	26.05 a	86.24 ab	9.37 bc	8.53 c	0.50 b
	T6	318.58 c	124.66 c	26.12 a	87.60 a	9.08 c	8.16 d	0.49 c
南粳5055	T1	241.72 d	111.38 d	25.60 a	87.05 a	6.00 e	5.40 e	0.47 d
Nanjing 5055	T2	349.66 ab	129.81 a	24.93 d	83.73 e	9.48 b	8.51 b	0.52 ab
	T3	354.46 a	129.46 a	24.95 d	84.41 d	9.66 a	8.90 a	0.53 a
	T4	343.36 b	128.72 a	25.04 cd	85.18 c	9.43 b	8.54 b	0.51 b
	T5	336.64 c	122.90 b	25.24 bc	85.47 bc	8.92 c	8.15 c	0.50 c
	T6	330.35 c	119.92 c	25.32 b	86.08 b	8.64 d	7.78 d	0.50 c

品种 Variety	处理 Treatment	糙米率 Brown rice rate/%	精米率 Milled rice rate/%	整精米率 Head milled rice rate/%	垩白粒率 Chalkiness grain rate/%	垩白度 Chalkiness/%	长宽比 Aspect ratio
南粳9108	T1	81.33 c	72.96 d	63.03 d	15.85 b	4.29 b	1.74 a
Nanjing 9108	T2	84.72 ab	75.98 a	69.86 a	17.85 a	5.12 a	1.73 a
	T3	84.91 a	76.30 a	69.64 a	17.68 a	4.82 a	1.73 a
	T4	84.70 ab	75.68 ab	68.73 ab	13.87 d	3.91 b	1.73 a
	T5	84.58 ab	75.29 bc	67.43 bc	14.01 cd	3.95 b	1.74 a
	T6	84.45 b	74.62 c	66.63 c	14.57 c	4.14 b	1.73 a
南粳5055	T1	81.88 c	73.33 b	65.01 c	7.94 ab	2.21 a	1.69 a
Nanjing 5055	T2	83.70 ab	76.63 a	69.55 ab	8.61 a	2.13 ab	1.67 a
	T3	84.14 a	76.77 a	69.86 a	8.73 a	2.18 ab	1.67 a
	T4	83.68 ab	76.55 a	69.31 ab	6.89 c	1.98 ab	1.68 a
	T5	83.68 ab	76.35 a	69.02 ab	6.82 c	1.94 b	1.68 a
	T6	83.54 b	76.30 a	68.14 b	7.41 bc	2.02 ab	1.69 a

品种 Variety	处理 Treatment	糙米率 Brown rice rate/%	精米率 Milled rice rate/%	整精米率 Head milled rice rate/%	垩白粒率 Chalkiness grain rate/%	垩白度 Chalkiness/%	长宽比 Aspect ratio
南粳9108	T1	81.33 c	72.96 d	63.03 d	15.85 b	4.29 b	1.74 a
Nanjing 9108	T2	84.72 ab	75.98 a	69.86 a	17.85 a	5.12 a	1.73 a
	T3	84.91 a	76.30 a	69.64 a	17.68 a	4.82 a	1.73 a
	T4	84.70 ab	75.68 ab	68.73 ab	13.87 d	3.91 b	1.73 a
	T5	84.58 ab	75.29 bc	67.43 bc	14.01 cd	3.95 b	1.74 a
	T6	84.45 b	74.62 c	66.63 c	14.57 c	4.14 b	1.73 a
南粳5055	T1	81.88 c	73.33 b	65.01 c	7.94 ab	2.21 a	1.69 a
Nanjing 5055	T2	83.70 ab	76.63 a	69.55 ab	8.61 a	2.13 ab	1.67 a
	T3	84.14 a	76.77 a	69.86 a	8.73 a	2.18 ab	1.67 a
	T4	83.68 ab	76.55 a	69.31 ab	6.89 c	1.98 ab	1.68 a
	T5	83.68 ab	76.35 a	69.02 ab	6.82 c	1.94 b	1.68 a
	T6	83.54 b	76.30 a	68.14 b	7.41 bc	2.02 ab	1.69 a

品种 Variety	处理 Treatment	外观 Appearance	硬度 Hardness	黏度 Viscosity	平衡度 Balance degree	食味值 Taste value
南粳9108	T1	5.82 b	7.25 a	6.33 b	5.52 c	64.33 c
Nanjing 9108	T2	6.25 a	6.97 ab	6.40 b	6.18 b	66.00 bc
	T3	6.30 a	6.82 ab	6.73 ab	6.30 ab	67.67 b
	T4	6.48 a	6.78 b	7.05 ab	6.28 ab	67.83 ab
	T5	6.45 a	6.88 ab	7.25 ab	6.57 ab	68.33 ab
	T6	6.38 a	7.05 ab	7.58 a	6.85 a	70.33 a
南粳5055	T1	6.03 b	7.78 a	6.23 c	5.30 b	62.37 b
Nanjing 5055	T2	6.45 a	7.23 c	6.42 bc	6.28 a	64.83 ab
	T3	6.42 a	7.20 c	6.58 abc	6.35 a	65.00 ab
	T4	6.47 a	7.18 c	6.95 a	6.52 a	67.17 a
	T5	6.40 a	7.20 c	6.67 ab	6.17 ab	67.17 a
	T6	6.28 a	7.42 b	6.32 bc	5.92 ab	66.33 a

麦秸行间集覆还田下控释氮肥减施对水稻产量、品质与氮肥利用率的影响

Effects of reduced application of controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer on rice yield, quality and nitrogen fertilizer utilization efficiency under concentrated coverage of wheat straw between rows for returning to field

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 9

参考文献 42

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

品种 Variety	处理 Treatment	蛋白质含量 Protein content/%	直链淀粉含量 Amylose content/%	胶稠度 Gel consistency
南粳9108	T1	6.43 d	13.30 ab	91.00 a
Nanjing 9108	T2	7.13 ab	12.27 c	82.67 c
	T3	7.20 a	12.33 c	84.67 bc
	T4	6.83 bc	12.53 bc	86.33 abc
	T5	6.67 cd	13.63 a	87.00 abc
	T6	6.53 cd	14.03 a	89.33 ab
南粳5055	T1	6.97 b	12.67 abc	91.00 a
Nanjing 5055	T2	7.43 a	12.33 c	82.33 bc
	T3	7.57 a	12.27 c	80.67 c
	T4	7.47 a	12.43 bc	83.67 abc
	T5	7.43 a	12.90 ab	85.67 abc
	T6	7.27 ab	13.03 a	88.33 ab

品种 Variety	处理 Treatment	齐穗期各部分的含氮量 Nitrogen content of rice at full heading stage			成熟期各部分的含氮量 Nitrogen content of rice at maturity stage
品种 Variety	处理 Treatment	茎鞘Stem and sheath	叶片Leaf	穗Panicle	茎鞘Stem and sheath	叶片Leaf	穗Panicle
南粳9108	T1	5.73 b	18.11 d	9.90 d	5.69 c	7.59 b	10.96 d
Nanjing 9108	T2	7.39 a	24.49 b	11.40 ab	6.45 a	8.45 a	12.50 a
	T3	7.51 a	25.66 a	11.76 a	6.39 ab	8.57 a	12.60 a
	T4	7.42 a	24.25 bc	10.93 bc	6.42 ab	8.46 a	11.94 b
	T5	7.39 a	24.62 b	10.60 c	6.34 ab	8.41 a	11.80 bc
	T6	7.06 a	23.58 c	10.44 cd	6.11 b	8.21 a	11.43 c
南粳5055	T1	5.63 b	19.49 c	10.65 c	5.47 b	7.81 b	11.19 c
Nanjing 5055	T2	7.34 a	25.42 ab	11.74 ab	6.27 a	9.00 a	13.03 a
	T3	7.28 a	25.87 a	12.25 a	6.18 a	9.07 a	13.11 a
	T4	7.23 a	25.74 a	11.91 ab	6.23 a	9.02 a	12.95 a
	T5	7.20 a	25.37 ab	11.58 abc	6.06 a	9.14 a	12.45 b
	T6	6.97 a	24.88 b	11.15 bc	5.82 ab	8.76 ab	12.12 b

品种Variety	处理Treatment	AE_N/(kg·kg^-1)	IE_N/(kg·kg^-1)	PFP_N/(kg·kg^-1)	RE_N/%
南粳9108	T2	10.30 b	43.57 b	27.51 d	36.06 c
Nanjing 9108	T3	10.88 a	43.91 b	28.09 d	36.89 bc
	T4	10.91 a	44.31 b	30.03 c	37.67 ab
	T5	10.82 ab	44.58 b	32.23 b	38.66 a
	T6	10.74 ab	46.11 a	35.34 a	37.90 ab
南粳5055	T2	9.42 b	42.32 c	25.50 e	33.32 b
Nanjing 5055	T3	10.58 a	43.96 abc	26.96 d	33.71 b
	T4	10.57 a	43.24 bc	28.09 c	35.81 a
	T5	10.40 a	44.39 ab	30.11 b	34.99 ab
	T6	10.28 a	45.39 a	33.21 a	34.70 ab

指标 Index	与各指标的相关系数Correlation coefficient with other indexes
指标 Index	实际产量 Measured yield	整精米率 Head milled rice rate	垩白度 Chalkiness	食味值 Taste value	蛋白质含量 Protein content	直链淀粉含量 Amylose content	胶稠度 Gel consistency	PFP_N
整精米率	0.873^**
Head milled rice rate
垩白度Chalkiness	0.191	-0.130
食味值Taste value	0.562^**	0.247	0.330^*
蛋白质含量	0.419^*	0.722^**	-0.596^**	-0.225
Protein content
直链淀粉含量	-0.293	-0.558^**	0.180	0.460^**	-0.650^**
Amylose content
胶稠度	-0.683^**	-0.772^**	0.106	-0.035	-0.644^**	0.534^**
Gel consistency
PFP_N	-0.666^**	-0.825^**	0.073	0.654^**	-0.628^**	0.839^**	0.736^**
RE_N	0.401*	-0.133	0.471^**	0.420*	-0.494^**	0.090	0.124	0.044

[1]	许卫猛, 徐妍, 陈国立. 基于多种分析方法的糯玉米品质综合评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(9): 1840-1848.
[2]	吴菊, 杨飞, 吴国泉, 傅贤, 徐晨光. 砂培和土壤栽培对黄瓜生长、产量与品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(9): 1905-1913.
[3]	朱为静, 吴佳, 洪春来, 朱凤香, 洪磊东, 张涛, 张硕, 诸惠芬. 秸秆覆盖对土壤水热肥及蟠桃产量和品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(9): 1924-1932.
[4]	裴惠民, 巫明明, 翟荣荣, 叶靖, 金月, 朱仪, 侯建军, 朱国富, 叶胜海. 低镉水稻基因功能与新品种培育研究进展[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(9): 2012-2020.
[5]	贺世雄, 杨蕾, 齐安民, 程籍, 王敏, 李英奎, 洪林. 中间砧对3种杂柑叶片光合特性、理化指标和果实品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(8): 1680-1693.
[6]	张顺昌, 徐继根, 符成悦, 蒲占湑, 胡丽鹏, 吴昊, 李俊兵, 辛亮, 雷元军. 喷施氨基酸钙对红美人杂柑果皮龟裂与品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(8): 1706-1715.
[7]	张智颖, 邱琴, 侯立娟, 徐平, 蒋宁, 林金盛, 李辉平, 曲绍轩, 马林, 王伟霞, 李福后. 杀虫剂施用对秀珍菇和毛木耳的安全性评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(8): 1733-1742.
[8]	严福林, 郎云虎, 简应权, 陈雄飞, 魏巍, 王志威, 安江勇, 任得强, 丁宁, 魏升华. 八爪金龙药材产量与品质对土壤理化性状的响应[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(8): 1766-1775.
[9]	王呈阳, 刘洁雅, 吴敏怡, 谢博伊, 洪德成, 冷锋, 吴国泉. 钙处理对涝害下寒香蜜葡萄果实品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(7): 1451-1458.
[10]	谭诗逸, 俞国红, 薛向磊, 赵颖雷, 许宝玉, 张成浩. 工厂化水稻育秧盘搬运装置设计与试验[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(7): 1545-1555.
[11]	张若楠, 门小明, 秦凯鹏, 王彬彬, 吴杰, 丁向彬, 徐子伟, 齐珂珂. 绿嘉黑猪的不同杂交组合生长性能、胴体品质、产肉性能和收益比较研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(6): 1203-1211.
[12]	项缨, 丛建民, 潘丹红, 陶永刚. 春大棚有机种植不同品种番茄的生育进程分析和综合评价研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(6): 1252-1261.
[13]	刘文琦, 胡齐赞, 岳智臣, 陶鹏, 雷娟利, 李必元, 赵彦婷, 王华森. 夏季高温对叶用芥菜外观与营养品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(6): 1262-1271.
[14]	张智, 何豪豪, 郁妙, 许剑锋. 化肥减量配施土壤改良剂对土壤酸度、土壤养分和水稻产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(6): 1301-1308.
[15]	林小兵, 黎江, 成艳红, 王斌强, 何绍浪, 黄尚书, 黄欠如. 不同有机物料对土壤微生物生物量、矿质氮含量与水稻产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(6): 1309-1318.