Effects of nutrient solution formulation on growth, yield and nutritional quality of hydroponic vegetable sweet potato

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20250355

Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis ›› 2026, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (7): 1297-1312.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20250355

• Crop Science • Previous Articles Next Articles

Effects of nutrient solution formulation on growth, yield and nutritional quality of hydroponic vegetable sweet potato

MA Wenqing(), PANG Linjiang, WANG Siyu, SHU Xing, CUI Peng, XU Ximing, LYU Zunfu, LU Guoquan^*()

College of Modern Agriculture, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou 311300, China

Received:2025-05-06 Online:2026-07-25 Published:2026-08-20

Abstract

Abstract:

Vegetable sweet potato, as a novel leafy vegetable, currently lacks specialized nutrient solution formulations for hydroponic cultivation. To investigate the effects of different nutrient solution formulations on the growth, yield and quality of hydroponic vegetable sweet potato, this study used the nutrient film technique (NFT) for hydroponic cultivation. Three vegetable sweet potato varieties, Shulyu 1 (variety A), Xucaiguan 1 (variety B), and Nonglin Zibai (variety C), were used as experimental materials. Six nutrient solution formulation treatments were established: Hoagland universal formulation (control, CK), Japanese garden trial formulation (T1), South China Agricultural University leafy vegetable A formulation (T2), the Japanese Yamazaki Chrysanthemum formulation (T3), Cooper universal formulation (T4) and Dutch greenhouse formulation (T5). By measuring growth indicators, texture indicators and quality indicators of each variety under different nutrient solution formulations, the effects of different formulations on the growth, yield and quality of vegetable sweet potato were studied. A comprehensive quality evaluation model was constructed based on principal component analysis, and quality was evaluated through comprehensive scores to screen for the optimal nutrient solution formulation and variety. The results showed that under different nutrient solution formulations, the trends of indicator changes varied among the vegetable sweet potato varieties. Under the T2 treatment, the shoot dry matter rate, soluble sugar content, starch content and vitamin C content of all three varieties reached their highest levels, while nitrate content was the lowest. The trends for other indicators were inconsistent among different formulations; for example, yield per plant was higher under CK, T1 and T3 treatments. The comprehensive scores of vegetable sweet potatoes under different formulation treatments showed a relatively consistent trend. The comprehensive scores of all three varieties under the T2 treatment were the highest and significantly higher than those of CK and other treatment groups. The comprehensive scores of variety B and variety C under each treatment were similar and both were significantly higher than that of variety A. In conclusion, among the six nutrient solution formulations, the South China Agricultural University leafy vegetable A formulation was the optimal formulation, significantly improving the quality of hydroponic vegetable sweet potato. The qualities of Xucaiguan 1 (variety B) and Nonglin Zibai (variety C) were relatively similar and both were superior to that of Shulyu 1 (variety A).

Key words: vegetable sweet potato, nutrient solution formulation, hydroponics, quality, comprehensive evaluation model

CLC Number:

S531

MA Wenqing, PANG Linjiang, WANG Siyu, SHU Xing, CUI Peng, XU Ximing, LYU Zunfu, LU Guoquan. Effects of nutrient solution formulation on growth, yield and nutritional quality of hydroponic vegetable sweet potato[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2026, 38(7): 1297-1312.

Figures/Tables 13

References 33

[1]	黄杰, 王文希, 邢丹英. 甘薯高产高效栽培技术[J]. 农村实用技术, 2020(6): 49-50.
	Huang J, Wang W X, Xing D Y. High-yield and high-efficiency cultivation techniques of sweet potato[J]. Nongcun Shiyong Jishu, 2020(6): 49-50.
[2]	望宇洪, 杨新笋, 姚国新, 等. 菜用甘薯的特征特性与研究现状[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2011, 50(10): 2028-2030.
	Wang Y H, Yang X S, Yao G X, et al. Research status and characteristics of sweetpotato for vegetable[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2011, 50(10): 2028-2030.
[3]	Nguyen H C, Chen C C, Lin K H, et al. Bioactive compounds, antioxidants, and health benefits of sweet potato leaves[J]. Molecules, 2021, 26(7): 1820.
[4]	Almoraie N M. The role of ipomoea batatas leaves extract on the treatment of diabetes induced by streptozotocin[J]. Pharmacophore, 2019, 10(3): 14-20.
[5]	Gundala S R, Yang C H, Lakshminarayana N, et al. Polar biophenolics in sweet potato greens extract synergize to inhibit prostate cancer cell proliferation and in vivo tumor growth[J]. Carcinogenesis, 2013, 34(9): 2039-2049.
[6]	Karna P, Gundala S R, Gupta M V, et al. Polyphenol-rich sweet potato greens extract inhibits proliferation and induces apoptosis in prostate cancer cells in vitro and in vivo[J]. Carcinogenesis, 2011, 32(12): 1872-1880.
[7]	Liao W C, Lai Y C, Yuan M C, et al. Antioxidative activity of water extract of sweet potato leaves in Taiwan[J]. Food Chemistry, 2011, 127(3): 1224-1228.
[8]	陈彤, 李丽洪, 陈小河, 等. “龙薯24号”叶提取物对CCl4肝损伤小鼠的保护作用[J]. 龙岩学院学报, 2017, 35(2): 115-120.
	Chen T, Li L H, Chen X H, et al. Protective effects of “Longshu 24” leaf extracts on CCl4 liver injury mice[J]. Journal of Longyan University, 2017, 35(2): 115-120.
[9]	吕晓玲, 王婷婷, 李凯, 等. 紫甘薯提取物对自然衰老更年期大鼠生理状态的改善[J]. 营养学报, 2015, 37(2): 196-200.
	Lyu X L, Wang T T, Li K, et al. Physiological status is improved by purple sweet potato extract in aging climacteric rats[J]. Acta Nutrimenta Sinica, 2015, 37(2): 196-200.
[10]	Zhang L, Tu Z C, Yuan T, et al. Antioxidants and α-glucosidase inhibitors from Ipomoea batatas leaves identified by bioassay-guided approach and structure-activity relationships[J]. Food Chemistry, 2016, 208: 61-67.
[11]	曹清河, 季志仙, 李强, 等. 菜用甘薯新品种薯绿1号的选育[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2017(3): 70-72.
	Cao Q H, Ji Z X, Li Q, et al. A new vegetable-used sweet-potato variety: ‘Shulyu No.1’[J]. China Vegetables, 2017(3): 70-72.
[12]	郭世荣. 无土栽培学[M]. 2版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2011.
[13]	林黄昉, 林碧英, 彭雨欣, 等. 水培小白菜营养液配方及管理模式的筛选[J]. 江西农业学报, 2022, 34(11): 45-49.
	Lin H F, Lin B Y, Peng Y X, et al. Selection of nutrient solution formula and management mode of hydroponic pakchoi[J]. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi, 2022, 34(11): 45-49.
[14]	乔佳乐, 郭美玲, 窦煜炜, 等. 营养液配方优化及其对水培生菜生长和生产效率的影响[J]. 山东农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 54(2): 166-172.
	Qiao J L, Guo M L, Dou Y W, et al. Optimization of nutrient solution formula and its effect on growth and production efficiency of hydroponic lettuce[J]. Journal of Shandong Agricultural University(Natural Science Edition), 2023, 54(2): 166-172.
[15]	樊晓刚, 李昌伟, 陈素贤, 等. 不同营养液配方对水培韭菜生长发育和品质的影响[J]. 中国果菜, 2023, 43(10): 67-70.
	Fan X G, Li C W, Chen S X, et al. Effects of different nutrient solution formulas on the growth, development, and quality of hydroponic Chinese chives[J]. China Fruit & Vegetable, 2023, 43(10): 67-70.
[16]	张允刚, 房伯平. 甘薯种质资源描述规范和数据标准[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006.
[17]	赵世杰, 苍晶. 植物生理学实验指导[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2016.
[18]	李合生. 植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2000.
[19]	高俊凤. 植物生理学实验指导[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2006.
[20]	曹建康, 姜微波, 赵玉梅. 果蔬采后生理生化实验指导[M]. 北京: 中国轻工业出版社, 2007.
[21]	刘家尧, 刘新. 植物生理学实验教程[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2010.
[22]	Ha S T, Wilkins C L, Abidi S L. Analysis of antimycin A by reversed-phase liquid chromatography/nuclear magnetic resonance spectrometry[J]. Analytical Chemistry, 1989, 61(5): 404-408.
[23]	赵波, 张青, 张晓宇, 等. 茎尖菜用甘薯品种产量及品质分析[J]. 北京农学院学报, 2011, 26(1): 1-3.
	Zhao B, Zhang Q, Zhang X Y, et al. Analysis on yield and quality traits of stem tips in sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) used for vegetable[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Agriculture, 2011, 26(1): 1-3.
[24]	张倩, 李军生, 黄国霞, 等. 过氧化钙对苋菜常温活体保鲜效果的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2013, 52(1): 174-176.
	Zhang Q, Li J S, Huang G X, et al. Effects of CaO₂ on in vitro preservation of Amaranthus tricolor at normal temperature[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 52(1): 174-176.
[25]	王彦荣, 华泽田, 陈温福, 等. 粳型超级杂交稻辽优3225根系生理特性研究[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2003, 17(1): 37-41.
	Wang Y R, Hua Z T, Chen W F, et al. Root physiological characteristics of super Japonica hybrid rice Liaoyou 3225[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2003, 17(1): 37-41.
[26]	Liu J J, Wei Z, Li J H. Effects of copper on leaf membrane structure and root activity of maize seedling[J]. Botanical Studies, 2014, 55(1): 47.
[27]	吕小红, 陈温福, 宋玉婷, 等. 施氮条件下不同株型水稻品种的根系活力研究[J]. 北方水稻, 2014, 44(4): 7-11.
	Lyu X H, Chen W F, Song Y T, et al. Study on root activity between different plant type rice under several nitrogen levels[J]. North Rice, 2014, 44(4): 7-11.
[28]	孟焕文, 程智慧, 苏莉, 等. 大蒜不同品种硝酸盐积累规律研究[J]. 西北植物学报, 2006, 26(10): 2051-2055.
	Meng H W, Cheng Z H, Su L, et al. Patterns of nitrate accumulation in different garlic varieties[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2006, 26(10): 2051-2055.
[29]	韩珑, 王婷, 高俊杰, 等. 施氮量对有机基质栽培韭菜生长、品质及氮素利用的影响[J]. 中国瓜菜, 2024, 37(10): 141-148.
	Han L, Wang T, Gao J J, et al. Effects of nitrogen application on growth, quality and nitrogen utilization of Chinese chives in organic substrate culture[J]. China Cucurbits and Vegetables, 2024, 37(10): 141-148.
[30]	刘明月, 秦玉芝, 蔡雁平, 等. N P K施用量与芹菜硝酸盐积累和产量的相关性[J]. 中国蔬菜, 1998(6): 4-7.
	Liu M Y, Qin Y Z, Cai Y P, et al. Study on the relationship between the application rate of N, P, K and the accumulation of nitrate and yield of celery[J]. China Vegetables, 1998(6): 4-7.
[31]	黄静艳. 不同培养条件对甘薯芽菜营养品质及产量的研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江农林大学, 2018.
	Huang J Y. Nutritional quality and yield of sweetpotato sprouts with different culture conditions[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang A&F University, 2018.
[32]	王锐, 欧行奇, 李新华. 叶菜型甘薯品种‘百薯1号’茎尖不同部位淀粉含量变化的研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2013, 29(30): 60-63.
	Wang R, Ou X Q, Li X H. Study on the change of starch content in different parts of stem apex of sweet potato variety ‘Baishu No.1’[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2013, 29(30): 60-63.
[33]	管文杰. 蔬用甘蓝型油菜的产量与品质性状研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2021.
	Guan W J. Study on yield and quality characters of vegetable Brassica napus L[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2021.

配方 Formulation	盐类化合物质量浓度/(mg·L^-1) Mass concentration of salt compounds/(mg·L^-1)
配方 Formulation	Ca(NO₃)₂·4H₂O	KNO₃	NH₄NO₃		NH₄H₂PO₄		KH₂PO₄	(NH₄)₂SO₄		K₂SO₄	MgSO₄·7H₂O
CK	945	607	0		115		0	0		0	493
T1	945	809	0		153		0	0		0	493
T2	472	267	53		0		100	0		116	264
T3	472	809	0		153		0	0		0	493
T4	1 062	505	0		0		140	0		0	738
T5	886	303	0		0		204	33		218	247
配方 Formulation	元素浓度/(mmol·L^-1) Element concentration/(mmol·L^-1)
配方 Formulation	氮(铵态氮) Nitrogen (ammonium nitrogen)			磷P		钾K			钙Ca	镁Mg		硫S
CK	15.00(1.00)			1.00		6.00			4.0	2.0		2.0
T1	17.33(1.33)			1.33		8.00			4.0	2.0		2.0
T2	8.00(0.67)			0.74		4.74			2.0	1.0		2.0
T3	13.33(1.33)			1.33		8.00			2.0	2.0		2.0
T4	14.00(0)			1.03		6.03			4.5	3.0		3.0
T5	11.00(0.50)			1.50		7.00			3.7	1.0		2.5

配方 Formulation	盐类化合物质量浓度/(mg·L^-1) Mass concentration of salt compounds/(mg·L^-1)
配方 Formulation	Ca(NO₃)₂·4H₂O	KNO₃	NH₄NO₃		NH₄H₂PO₄		KH₂PO₄	(NH₄)₂SO₄		K₂SO₄	MgSO₄·7H₂O
CK	945	607	0		115		0	0		0	493
T1	945	809	0		153		0	0		0	493
T2	472	267	53		0		100	0		116	264
T3	472	809	0		153		0	0		0	493
T4	1 062	505	0		0		140	0		0	738
T5	886	303	0		0		204	33		218	247
配方 Formulation	元素浓度/(mmol·L^-1) Element concentration/(mmol·L^-1)
配方 Formulation	氮(铵态氮) Nitrogen (ammonium nitrogen)			磷P		钾K			钙Ca	镁Mg		硫S
CK	15.00(1.00)			1.00		6.00			4.0	2.0		2.0
T1	17.33(1.33)			1.33		8.00			4.0	2.0		2.0
T2	8.00(0.67)			0.74		4.74			2.0	1.0		2.0
T3	13.33(1.33)			1.33		8.00			2.0	2.0		2.0
T4	14.00(0)			1.03		6.03			4.5	3.0		3.0
T5	11.00(0.50)			1.50		7.00			3.7	1.0		2.5

主成分 Principal component	特征值 Eigenvalue	方差贡献率/% Variance contribution rate/%	累计方差贡献率/% Cumulative variance contribution rate/%
1	8.229	35.779	35.779
2	4.542	19.748	55.526
3	3.318	14.428	69.954
4	1.739	7.562	77.516
5	1.224	5.320	82.836
6	1.010	4.390	87.226

主成分 Principal component	特征值 Eigenvalue	方差贡献率/% Variance contribution rate/%	累计方差贡献率/% Cumulative variance contribution rate/%
1	8.229	35.779	35.779
2	4.542	19.748	55.526
3	3.318	14.428	69.954
4	1.739	7.562	77.516
5	1.224	5.320	82.836
6	1.010	4.390	87.226

性状 Trait	主成分Principal component
性状 Trait	1	2	3	4	5	6
X₂₂	0.923	-0.080	0.146	0.123	-0.167	-0.062
X₁₆	0.920	-0.084	0.015	0.094	-0.139	-0.152
X₂₁	0.879	-0.193	0.144	0.134	0.072	-0.195
X₂₃	-0.872	0.031	0.244	-0.136	0.132	0.158
X₁₁	0.820	-0.161	0.422	-0.200	-0.162	0.035
X₁	-0.793	-0.131	-0.521	-0.004	-0.086	-0.041
X₁₃	0.759	0.255	0.019	-0.315	0.216	0.349
X₂	0.745	-0.123	-0.187	0.078	0.285	0.281
X₆	0.685	0.490	-0.181	-0.095	0.403	-0.059
X₂₀	0.613	-0.536	-0.298	0.111	0.044	0.279
X₁₀	0.579	-0.527	-0.282	-0.123	-0.416	0.259
X₉	0.525	0.369	0.446	-0.168	-0.175	0.106
X₇	-0.072	0.871	0.168	0.213	-0.209	-0.013
X₈	0.299	0.851	-0.14	0.051	-0.034	0.085
X₁₇	-0.292	-0.808	0.424	-0.088	0.024	0.160
X₁₈	-0.228	-0.759	0.521	-0.130	0.054	0.191
X₄	0.487	-0.332	-0.735	0.092	0.245	-0.005
X₁₉	0.233	0.112	-0.687	-0.364	0.177	-0.060
X₅	0.585	0.203	0.674	-0.194	0.024	-0.075
X₃	0.024	-0.376	-0.046	0.743	0.097	0.091
X₁₄	0.152	0.353	-0.087	0.667	-0.334	0.297
X₁₂	-0.049	0.076	0.597	0.450	0.599	-0.007
X₁₅	-0.467	0.526	-0.008	-0.134	0.066	0.618

Effects of nutrient solution formulation on growth, yield and nutritional quality of hydroponic vegetable sweet potato

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 13

References 33

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

品种 Variety	处理 Treatment	Y₁	Y₂	Y₃	Y₄	Y₅	Y₆	Y	综合排序 Comprehensive ranking
A	CK	-4.065	1.896	-2.498	0.406	1.522	-0.151	-1.335 b	16
	T1	-2.734	-1.150	-2.628	-0.712	-0.401	0.184	-1.652 b	17
	T2	-2.013	3.034	2.311	-1.612	-0.448	0.875	0.105 a	11
	T3	-3.859	-1.484	1.118	2.167	-0.127	0.614	-1.328 b	15
	T4	-4.036	0.174	1.208	-0.374	1.688	0.434	-1.155 b	14
	T5	-5.333	-0.850	0.182	-1.980	-1.652	-1.066	-2.334 c	18
B	CK	2.424	0.275	-1.541	0.104	1.496	-1.303	0.729 b	5
	T1	2.987	-2.552	-2.878	-2.075	-0.307	0.248	-0.013 c	13
	T2	3.249	0.977	2.170	-1.064	1.137	-1.063	1.602 a	2
	T3	2.125	-3.645	0.632	0.404	0.354	-0.164	0.174 c	10
	T4	0.929	-1.910	2.414	0.093	1.553	0.599	0.419 bc	7
	T5	1.919	-3.036	1.008	-0.594	-0.521	1.584	0.230 bc	9
C	CK	1.884	2.505	-1.967	0.202	0.471	-0.464	0.905 b	3
	T1	1.722	1.696	-2.325	1.023	-0.463	2.087	0.760 bc	4
	T2	3.235	3.971	1.328	-0.617	-1.270	0.551	2.043 a	1
	T3	0.552	-0.222	-0.177	2.759	-1.371	-0.415	0.246 de	8
	T4	0.276	1.001	1.141	1.541	-0.209	-0.735	0.534 cd	6
	T5	0.736	-0.681	0.503	0.329	-1.452	-1.815	0.069 e	12

品种 Variety	处理 Treatment	可溶性糖含量/% Soluble sugar content/%	维生素C含量/(mg·g^-1) Vitamin C content/(mg·g^-1)	硝酸盐含量/(mg·g^-1) Nitrate content/(mg·g^-1)
A	CK	0.13±0.01 c	0.68±0.07 b	0.91±0.10 c
	T1	0.15±0.01 c	0.73±0.08 b	1.61±0.14 a
	T2	0.34±0.04 a	0.89±0.09 a	0.65±0.04 d
	T3	0.19±0.02 b	0.60±0.03 b	1.10±0.09 b
	T4	0.11±0.01 c	0.72±0.06 b	1.05±0.10 bc
	T5	0.12±0.01 c	0.62±0.07 b	0.89±0.08 c
B	CK	0.17±0.02 c	1.08±0.09 ab	1.33±0.13 c
	T1	0.18±0.02 c	1.00±0.09 b	2.31±0.23 a
	T2	0.28±0.01 a	1.22±0.12 a	1.28±0.08 c
	T3	0.23±0.03 b	0.85±0.04 c	2.24±0.27 a
	T4	0.19±0.02 c	1.00±0.12 b	1.88±0.05 b
	T5	0.18±0.02 c	1.12±0.15 ab	1.88±0.15 b
C	CK	0.22±0.02 b	1.07±0.09 b	1.64±0.16 b
	T1	0.18±0.01 c	1.09±0.11 ab	2.21±0.20 a
	T2	0.30±0.03 a	1.26±0.11 a	1.21±0.10 c
	T3	0.19±0.02 bc	0.69±0.08 d	1.47±0.14 bc
	T4	0.17±0.02 c	0.87±0.11 c	1.62±0.14 b
	T5	0.18±0.01 c	0.63±0.05 d	1.42±0.14 bc

[1]	ZHANG Danke, WANG Li, LI Hairun, LI Haojing, CAO Jing, XU Guowei. Effects of slow-release fertilizer and exogenous substances application on grain filling characteristics and quality of the main crop in ratoon rice [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2026, 38(7): 1313-1326.
[2]	SUN Da, MAO Binyu, HUANG Danyi, CUI Hongchun, XIA Bing, ZHENG Xuxia. Study on the quality of West Lake Longjing tea in different regions based on soil properties [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2026, 38(6): 1087-1098.
[3]	LI Wenzhen, MEI Hanyi, WANG Shulin, NIE Jing, LI Chunlin, ZHANG Yongzhi, DENG Fengtao, YUAN Yuwei. Rapid and non-destructive identification of adulteration in Xizang yak ghee based on near infrared spectroscopy [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2026, 38(6): 1112-1125.
[4]	LI Kunfeng, LI Cheng, GAO Huaqi, HE Weiling, HUANG Lingxia. Effects of labor-saving management in cross-shaped plane trellis cultivation on growth, fruit yield and quality of fruit mulberry variety Da 10 [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2026, 38(6): 1209-1217.
[5]	GE Fangying, YUE Wenhao, CAI Kangfeng, SONG Xiujuan, WANG Junmei, LIU Lei. Advances on studies in major malt quality traits of malting barley [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2026, 38(5): 1024-1034.
[6]	ZHANG Hao, TAN Feng, ZHOU Yu, WANG Dachen, ZHOU Hongping, JIANG Hongzhe. Research progress of hyperspectral imaging technology in the in-situ sensing of crop quality and safety [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2026, 38(5): 1035-1047.
[7]	LI Yang, LIU Zhanqun, HE Runping, ZHAO Fei, XING Kun, YANG Cundi, PU Xiulan. Effects of microbial fertilizer on soil nutrients, melon quality, pest and disease control efficacy [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2026, 38(5): 909-918.
[8]	LI Jiaqi, HU Kuanlian, SHEN Zijing, SHI Jianguo, HE Yun. Changes in the quality of frost mulberry leaf under different frost stress periods [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2026, 38(5): 934-943.
[9]	QIN Xiang, DENG Xianghong, HUANG Zhanrui, YUAN Chi, CHEN Hao, HU Lianhua, HE Wanying, ZHAO Liangzhong. Optimization and quality analysis of pulsed vacuum marination for quail eggs [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2026, 38(5): 998-1007.
[10]	SHI Yin, WANG Yanxia, WANG Juanying, HUANG Xiaozhen. Comparative analysis on the tenderness and quality of wild ancient tea plants TZRR1 and Camellia sinensis L. cv. Fudingdabaicha in Guizhou [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2026, 38(4): 621-631.
[11]	WANG Huajie, CUI Hongchun, ZHAO Yun, HUANG Haitao, ZHU Lingping. Research progress on quality and safety evaluation systems for matcha [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2026, 38(4): 809-823.
[12]	DU Chenfei, LI Wenjue, WEI Chunyan, CAI Danying, WANG Yuezhi, SHI Zebin, DAI Meisong, GAO Yongbin. Research progress on genetic map construction in fruit trees and QTL identification of major fruit quality traits [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2026, 38(3): 609-620.
[13]	ZHANG Yue, WANG Jingran, ZHOU Qiang, CHEN Meiling, WANG Yanhong. Effects of exogenous spraying of folic acid on the folic acid content and quality of rice [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2026, 38(2): 197-205.
[14]	LIU Jing, WANG Jian, HUANG Yu, WU Xiaohua, GUO Xuanhe, WANG Ying, LI Guojing, XU Xiaojiang. Indicator screening and model development for evaluating pumpkin fruit quality [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2026, 38(2): 248-257.
[15]	XU Weimeng, XU Yan, CHEN Guoli. Comprehensive evaluation of waxy corn quality based on various analytical methods [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(9): 1840-1848.