碱性盐胁迫对夏蜡梅生长与离子分布的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2022.01.10

浙江农业学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (1): 79-88.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2022.01.10

碱性盐胁迫对夏蜡梅生长与离子分布的影响

周贝宁(), 毛恋, 花壮壮, 芦建国^*()

南京林业大学风景园林学院,江苏南京 210037

收稿日期:2020-09-06 出版日期:2022-01-25 发布日期:2022-02-05
通讯作者: 芦建国
作者简介:* 芦建国,E-mail: ljgnj@sina.com
周贝宁(1996—),女,浙江宁波人,硕士研究生,研究方向为园林植物应用、景观生态学。E-mail: 961721414@qq.com
基金资助:
江苏高校品牌专业建设工程(PPZY2015A063);江苏高校优势学科建设工程(PAPD)

Effects of alkaline salt stress on growth and ion allocation of Sinocalycanthus chinensis

ZHOU Beining(), MAO Lian, HUA Zhuangzhuang, LU Jianguo^*()

College of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China

Received:2020-09-06 Online:2022-01-25 Published:2022-02-05
Contact: LU Jianguo

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

采用不同浓度的碱性盐(NaHCO₃)溶液对3年生夏蜡梅实生苗进行处理,从形态生长和离子运输途径分析夏蜡梅对碱性盐胁迫的响应机制,为夏蜡梅的合理开发利用提供理论指导。结果表明:夏蜡梅苗高、地径相对生长量、生物量以及根冠比均随着盐碱胁迫的加重而不同程度的减少;随着碱性盐浓度的增加,各器官中 Na⁺含量均高于对照,其排序为:根>叶>茎;低浓度碱性盐胁迫下K⁺含量排序为:茎>根>叶,而高浓度胁迫下K⁺含量排序为:叶>茎>根;Ca²⁺含量排序为:叶>根>茎;夏蜡梅茎、叶中K⁺/Na⁺比值远大于根,叶中Ca²⁺/Na⁺比值远大于茎和根;夏蜡梅K⁺和Ca²⁺根系到茎部的选择运输能力排序:K⁺>Ca²⁺,从茎部到叶片排序为:Ca²⁺>K⁺,而从根系到叶片的选择运输能力基本相同。研究表明,碱性盐胁迫下,夏蜡梅的茎和叶通过吸收K⁺及Ca²⁺以阻止Na⁺的进入,将Na⁺贮存区隔在根系中以减轻盐离子对地上部分的伤害,叶片通过增加对矿质元素的吸收以维持离子平衡。

关键词: 夏蜡梅, 碱性盐胁迫, 生长, 离子运输

Abstract:

In this study, the three years old Sinocalycanthus chinensis seedlings were treated with different concentrations of alkaline salts (NaHCO₃) solutions, and the response mechanism of Sinocalycanthus chinensis to alkaline salt stress was analyzed from the morphological growth and ion transport routes, so as to provide theoretical guidance for the rational development and utilization of Sinocalycanthus chinensis. The results showed that the seedling height, relative growth of ground diameter, biomass and root-shoot ratio decreased with the increase of saline-alkali stress. With the increase of saline-alkali concentration, the Na⁺ content in each organ were significantly higher than that in the control group, the sequence was as follows: root>leaf>stem. Under low concentration alkaline salt stress, the K⁺ content sequence was as follows: stem>root>leaf, while under high concentration stress, the K⁺ content sequence was as follows: leaf>stem>root. The Ca²⁺ content sequence was as follows: leaf>root>stem. The K⁺/Na⁺ ratio in the stems and leaves of Sinocalycanthus chinensis was much higher than that in the roots and the Ca²⁺/Na⁺ ratio in the leaves was much higher than that in the stems and roots. The sequence of root-stem selective transport capacity of K⁺ and Ca²⁺: K⁺>Ca²⁺, stem-leaf: Ca²⁺>K⁺, while the root-leaf selective transport capacity was basically the same.In conclusion,under alkaline salt stress, the stems and leaves of Sinocalycanthus chinensis prevented the entry of Na⁺ by absorbing K⁺ and Ca²⁺, separated the Na⁺ storage area in the roots to reduce the damage of salt ions to the aboveground part, and the leaves maintained ion balance by increasing the absorption of mineral elements.

Key words: Sinocalycanthus chinensis, alkaline salt stress, growth, ion transport

中图分类号:

S685.99

周贝宁, 毛恋, 花壮壮, 芦建国. 碱性盐胁迫对夏蜡梅生长与离子分布的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(1): 79-88.

ZHOU Beining, MAO Lian, HUA Zhuangzhuang, LU Jianguo. Effects of alkaline salt stress on growth and ion allocation of Sinocalycanthus chinensis[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(1): 79-88.

图/表 6

参考文献 33

[1]	WANG J C, YAO L R, LI B C, et al. Comparative proteomic analysis of cultured suspension cells of the halophyte Halogeton glomeratus by iTRAQ provides insights into response mechanisms to salt stress[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2016, 7: 110.
[2]	毛恋, 芦建国, 江海燕. 植物响应盐碱胁迫的机制[J]. 分子植物育种, 2020, 18(10): 3441-3448.
	MAO L, LU J G, JIANG H Y. Mechanisms of plant responses to salt-alkali stress[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2020, 18(10): 3441-3448.(in Chinesewith English abstract)
[3]	MUNNS R, TESTER M. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance[J]. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2008, 59(1): 651-681. DOI URL
[4]	郑万钧, 章绍尧, 洪涛, 等. 中国经济树木新种及学名订正[J]. 林业科学, 1963(1): 1-14.
	ZHENG W J, ZHANG S Y, HONG T, et al. New species and revision of scientific names of economic trees in China[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 1963(1): 1-14.(in Chinese)
[5]	张丽萍, 陈香波, 金荷仙. 夏蜡梅研究进展[J]. 浙江林业科技, 2009, 29(1): 65-70.
	ZHANG L P, CHEN X B, JIN H X. Advances of researches on Calycanthus chinensis[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2009, 29(1): 65-70.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]	芦建国, 孙姿, 唐桂兰. 珍稀树种夏蜡梅研究进展[J]. 林业科技开发, 2015, 29(4): 1-6.
	LU J G, SUN Z, TANG G L. Research progress on the rare species of Calycanthus chinensis[J]. China Forestry Science and Technology, 2015, 29(4): 1-6.
[7]	赵宏波, 周莉花, 郝日明, 等. 中国特有濒危植物夏蜡梅的交配系统[J]. 生态学报, 2011, 31(3): 602-610.
	ZHAO H B, ZHOU L H, HAO R M, et al. Mating system of Sinocalycanthus chinensis(Cheng et S.Y.Chang), an endangered, indigenous species in China[J]. ActaEcologicaSinica, 2011, 31(3): 602-610.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	纪凯婷. 夏蜡梅幼苗年生长规律和耐盐性研究[D]. 南京: 南京林业大学, 2014.
	JI K T. Studies on annual growth rhythm and salt-tolerance of Sinocalycanthus chinensis seedlings[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Forestry University, 2014. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	章华婷. 盐胁迫对夏蜡梅幼苗生长的影响及机理研究[D]. 上海:上海师范大学, 2018.
	ZHANG H T. Effects of salt stress on the growth and its mechanism of the endangered species Sinocalycanthus chinensis seedlings[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Normal University, 2018. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]	陈丽飞. 遮荫及干旱胁迫对大花萱草生理特性的影响[D]. 长春: 吉林农业大学, 2007.
	CHEN L F. The effects of shading and water stress on physiology characteristics of Hemerocallis middendorfii[D]. Changchun: Jilin Agricultural University, 2007. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]	郑必昭. 土壤分析技术指南[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2013.
[12]	王志强, 吴翠云, 杨哲, 等. 盐碱胁迫对酸枣幼苗生长及生理生化特性的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2018, 36(2): 153-160.
	WANG Z Q, WU C Y, YANG Z, et al. Effect of saline-alkali stress on growth, physiological and biochemical characteristics of wild jujube seedlings[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2018, 36(2): 153-160.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]	李峰, 谢永宏, 覃盈盈. 盐胁迫条件下湿地植物的适应策略[J]. 生态学杂志, 2009, 28(2): 314-321.
	LI F, XIE Y H, QIN Y Y. Adaptive strategies of wetland plants in salt stress environment[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2009, 28(2): 314-321.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]	毛桂莲, 梁文裕, 王盛, 等. 碱性盐胁迫对宁夏枸杞生长、结构及光合参数的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2017, 35(4): 236-242.
	MAO G L, LIANG W Y, WANG S, et al. Effects of alkali stress on growth, structure and photosynthetic parameters of Lycium barbarum L.[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2017, 35(4): 236-242.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]	YEO A. Molecular biology of salt tolerance in the context of whole-plant physiology[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 1998, 49(323): 915-929.
[16]	杜远鹏, 晋学娟, 郭淑华, 等. 不同盐碱类型胁迫对红地球/贝达葡萄植株离子分布的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26(6): 1801-1806.
	DU Y P, JIN X J, GUO S H, et al. Effects of different salt and alkali stresses on ion distribution in Red globe/Beta grapevines[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2015, 26(6): 1801-1806.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]	石婧, 刘东洋, 张凤华. 棉花幼苗对盐胁迫的生理响应与耐盐机理[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(7): 1141-1148.
	SHI J, LIU D Y, ZHANG F H. Physiological response and salt tolerance mechanism of cotton seedlings to salt stress[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2020, 32(7): 1141-1148.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]	YANG C W, WANG P, LI C Y, et al. Comparison of effects of salt and alkali stresses on the growth and photosynjournal of wheat[J]. Photosynthetica, 2008, 46(1): 107-114. DOI URL
[19]	SUN M Z, JIA B W, CUI N, et al. Functional characterization of a Glycine soja Ca(²⁺)ATPase in salt-alkaline stress responses[J]. Plant Molecular Biology, 2016, 90(4/5): 419-434. DOI URL
[20]	颜路明, 郭祥泉. 盐碱胁迫对香樟幼苗离子吸收与分配的影响[J]. 土壤, 2015, 47(6): 1176-1180.
	YAN L M, GUO X Q. Effects of saline-alkali stress on Ion absorption and distribution of camphor seedling[J]. Soils, 2015, 47(6): 1176-1180.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]	ABBAS Z K, MOBIN M. Comparative growth and physiological responses of two wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars differing in salt tolerance to salinity and cyclic drought stress[J]. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 2016, 62(6): 745-758. DOI URL
[22]	郭瑞, 李峰, 周际, 等. 亚麻响应盐、碱胁迫的生理特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2016, 40(1): 69-79. DOI
	GUO R, LI F, ZHOU J, et al. Eco-physiological responses of linseed (Linum usitatissimum) to salt and alkali stresses[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2016, 40(1): 69-79. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
[23]	WAKEEL A, FAROOQ M, QADIR M, et al. Potassium substitution by sodium in plants[J]. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 2011, 30(4): 401-413. DOI URL
[24]	齐琪, 马书荣, 徐维东. 盐胁迫对植物生长的影响及耐盐生理机制研究进展[J]. 分子植物育种, 2020, 18(8): 2741-2746.
	QI Q, MA S R, XU W D. Advances in the effects of salt stress on plant growth and physiological mechanisms of salt tolerance[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2020, 18(8): 2741-2746.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[25]	陈展宇, 常雨婷, 邓川, 等. 盐碱生境对甜高粱幼苗抗氧化酶活性和生物量的影响[J]. 吉林农业大学学报, 2017, 39(1): 15-19.
	CHEN Z Y, CHANG Y T, DENG C, et al. Effect of saline-alkali habitat on antioxidant enzyme activity and biomass of sweet sorghum seedlings[J]. Journal of Jilin Agricultural University, 2017, 39(1): 15-19.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[26]	TIAN X Y, HE M R, WANG Z L, et al. Application of nitric oxide and calcium nitrate enhances tolerance of wheat seedlings to salt stress[J]. Plant Growth Regulation, 2015, 77(3): 343-356. DOI URL
[27]	WANG X P, GENG S J, MA Y Q, et al. Growth, photosynjournal, solute accumulation, and ion balance of tomato plant under sodium-or potassium-salt stress and alkali stress[J]. Agronomy Journal, 2015, 107(2): 651-661. DOI URL
[28]	石德成, 盛艳敏, 赵可夫. 不同盐浓度的混合盐对羊草苗的胁迫效应[J]. 植物学报, 1998, 40(12): 3-5.
	SHI D C, SHENG Y M, ZHAO K F. Stress effects of mixed salts with various salinities on the seedlings of aneuro Lepidium chinense[J]. Acta Botanica Sinica, 1998, 40(12): 3-5.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[29]	赵昕, 杨小菊, 石勇, 等. 盐胁迫下荒漠共生植物红砂与珍珠的根茎叶中离子吸收与分配特征[J]. 生态学报, 2014, 34(4): 963-972.
	ZHAO X, YANG X J, SHI Y, et al. Ion absorption and distribution of symbiotic Reaumuria soongorica and Salsol apasserina seedlings under NaCl stress[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014, 34(4): 963-972.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[30]	BLUMWALD E. Sodium transport and salt tolerance in plants[J]. Current Opinion in Cell Biology, 2000, 12(4): 431-434. DOI URL
[31]	周琦, 祝遵凌. NaCl胁迫对2种鹅耳枥幼苗生长及离子吸收、分配与运输的影响[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2015, 37(12): 7-16.
	ZHOU Q, ZHU Z L. Effects of NaCl stress on seedling growth and mineral ions uptake, distribution and transportation of two varieties of Carpinus L.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2015, 37(12): 7-16.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[32]	张科, 田长彦, 李春俭. 一年生盐生植物耐盐机制研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 2009, 33(6): 1220-1231. DOI
	ZHANG K, TIAN C Y, LI C J. Review of progress of studies on salt-tolerance mechanisms of annual halophytes[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2009, 33(6): 1220-1231.(in Chinese with English abstract) DOI
[33]	顾大形, 陈双林, 顾李俭, 等. 盐胁迫对四季竹细胞膜透性和矿质离子吸收、运输和分配的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2011, 30(7): 1417-1422.
	GU D X, CHEN S L, GU L J, et al. Impacts of NaCl stress on Oligostachyum lubricum cell membrane permeability and mineral ion uptake, transportation, and allocation[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2011, 30(7): 1417-1422.(in Chinese with English abstract)

NaHCO₃浓度 NaHCO₃ concentration/%	根重 Root weight/g	茎重 Stem weight/g	叶重 Leaf weight/g	根冠比 Root shoot ratio	总干重 Total dry weight/g
0	6.744 0 a	9.342 7 a	7.440 0 a	0.406 7 a	23.526 7 a
0.1	4.764 0 b	9.086 7 a	5.990 7 ab	0.317 7 ab	19.841 3 b
0.2	4.922 3 b	8.084 0 ab	5.284 3 abc	0.376 3 ab	18.290 7 b
0.3	5.271 7 b	9.326 0 a	5.398 7 abc	0.366 3 ab	19.996 3 b
0.4	4.182 7 b	7.178 3 bc	3.855 7 bcd	0.383 3 ab	15.216 7 c
0.5	2.473 7 c	6.224 3 c	3.606 3 cd	0.250 0 b	12.304 3 d
0.6	2.604 0 c	5.748 0 c	3.011 3 d	0.301 3 ab	11.363 3 d
0.7	1.945 7 c	5.588 0 c	2.376 3 d	0.243 0 b	9.910 0 d

NaHCO₃浓度 NaHCO₃ concentration/%	根重 Root weight/g	茎重 Stem weight/g	叶重 Leaf weight/g	根冠比 Root shoot ratio	总干重 Total dry weight/g
0	6.744 0 a	9.342 7 a	7.440 0 a	0.406 7 a	23.526 7 a
0.1	4.764 0 b	9.086 7 a	5.990 7 ab	0.317 7 ab	19.841 3 b
0.2	4.922 3 b	8.084 0 ab	5.284 3 abc	0.376 3 ab	18.290 7 b
0.3	5.271 7 b	9.326 0 a	5.398 7 abc	0.366 3 ab	19.996 3 b
0.4	4.182 7 b	7.178 3 bc	3.855 7 bcd	0.383 3 ab	15.216 7 c
0.5	2.473 7 c	6.224 3 c	3.606 3 cd	0.250 0 b	12.304 3 d
0.6	2.604 0 c	5.748 0 c	3.011 3 d	0.301 3 ab	11.363 3 d
0.7	1.945 7 c	5.588 0 c	2.376 3 d	0.243 0 b	9.910 0 d

NaHCO₃浓度 NaHCO₃ concentration/%	主根长 Length of axial root/cm	一级侧根数(d>2 mm) Number of primary lateralroots(d>2 mm)	根体积 Root volume/cm³
0	17.333 3 a	26.333 3 a	3.333 3 a
0.1	12.633 3 bc	20.666 7 ab	2.666 7 ab
0.2	13.866 7 b	16.666 7 bc	2.400 0 abc
0.3	12.166 7 bc	14.666 7 bc	3.333 3 a
0.4	9.366 7 cd	12.666 7 cd	1.666 7 bc
0.5	8.200 0 d	13.666 7 cd	1.733 3 bc
0.6	8.333 3 d	11.000 0 cd	1.666 7 bc
0.7	5.900 0 d	8.000 0 d	1.366 7 c

NaHCO₃浓度 NaHCO₃ concentration/%	主根长 Length of axial root/cm	一级侧根数(d>2 mm) Number of primary lateralroots(d>2 mm)	根体积 Root volume/cm³
0	17.333 3 a	26.333 3 a	3.333 3 a
0.1	12.633 3 bc	20.666 7 ab	2.666 7 ab
0.2	13.866 7 b	16.666 7 bc	2.400 0 abc
0.3	12.166 7 bc	14.666 7 bc	3.333 3 a
0.4	9.366 7 cd	12.666 7 cd	1.666 7 bc
0.5	8.200 0 d	13.666 7 cd	1.733 3 bc
0.6	8.333 3 d	11.000 0 cd	1.666 7 bc
0.7	5.900 0 d	8.000 0 d	1.366 7 c

NaHCO₃浓度 NaHCO₃ concentration/%	根 Root		茎 Stem		叶 Leaf
NaHCO₃浓度 NaHCO₃ concentration/%	K⁺/Na⁺	Ca²⁺/Na⁺	K⁺/Na⁺	Ca²⁺/Na⁺	K⁺/Na⁺	Ca²⁺/Na⁺
0	5.60±0.68 a	4.76±0.57 a	27.24±1.90 ab	28.34±2.59 a	22.94±5.22 ab	57.37±15.11 a
0.1	2.97±0.05 b	3.47±050 b	30.53±5.20 a	22.51±6.16 a	22.98±4.38 ab	47.22±3.35 ab
0.2	2.01±0.22 c	1.60±0.08 cd	19.19±0.93 bc	9.35±0.52 b	23.22±4.66 ab	35.44±4.79 abc
0.3	1.24±0.18 cd	1.87±0.40 cd	21.89±2.13 bc	10.76±0.24 b	37.84±7.60 a	52.59±10.57 ab
0.4	1.23±0.25 cd	2.63±0.42 bc	17.61±1.62 cd	10.87±0.19 b	38.28±9.09 a	39.11±3.00 ab
0.5	1.04±0.38 cd	1.49±0.26 cd	14.13±2.94 cd	8.17±0.89 b	7.83±1.85 b	13.63±3.43 c
0.6	0.59±0.17 d	1.11±0.13 d	9.81±1.20 d	6.34±1.07 b	9.14±1.46 b	13.04±0.99 c
0.7	0.53±0.13 d	0.80±0.10 d	13.92±2.00 cd	8.44±1.50 b	20.14±6.98 ab	31.77±4.58 bc

碱性盐胁迫对夏蜡梅生长与离子分布的影响

Effects of alkaline salt stress on growth and ion allocation of Sinocalycanthus chinensis

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 33

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

NaHCO₃浓度 NaHCO₃ concentration/%	根-茎 Root-stem		茎-叶 Stem-leaf		根-叶 Root-leaf
NaHCO₃浓度 NaHCO₃ concentration/%	S_K,Na	S_Ca,Na	S_K,Na	S_Ca,Na	S_K,Na	S_Ca,Na
0	4.95±0.41 c	6.15±0.93 b	0.83±0.17 bc	2.03±0.51 cd	3.98±0.53 d	11.62±2.07 c
0.1	10.24±1.58 bc	6.72±1.73 ab	0.84±0.29 bc	2.47±0.74 bcd	7.78±1.58 cd	14.09±1.79 bc
0.2	9.96±1.76 bc	5.85±0.19 b	1.19±0.18 bc	3.76±0.30 abc	12.50±4.17 bcd	22.01±2.16 bc
0.3	18.83±3.88 ab	6.37±1.48 b	1.71±0.27 ab	4.87±0.95 a	33.34±9.74 ab	33.68±13.15 ab
0.4	15.35±3.12 bc	4.42±0.88 b	2.26±0.60 a	3.59±0.21 abc	31.11±5.26 abc	16.23±4.23 bc
0.5	15.28±2.22 bc	5.78±0.96 b	0.55±0.04 c	1.62±0.23 d	8.41±1.37 bcd	9.72±2.61 c
0.6	20.82±7.52 ab	6.16±1.91 b	0.94±0.14 bc	2.12±0.18 bcd	19.14±7.69 abcd	12.37±2.62 Bc
0.7	28.96±6.62 a	10.63±1.79 a	1.38±0.30 abc	3.94±0.78 ab	43.58±16.15 a	41.71±9.14 Aa

[1]	江小帆, 吴涛, 魏玉明, 杨发荣, 陈国顺, 焦婷, 蔡原, 赵生国. 饲粮中添加牛至精油对芦花鸡生长性能、屠宰性能、器官指数和肠道形态的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(1): 41-49.
[2]	冯小芳, 蒋秋斐, 封元, 王瑜, 陈亚飞, 母童, 黎明, 周子航, 蔡正云, 张娟, 顾亚玲. 安格斯牛体重和体尺性状生长曲线拟合与相关性分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(1): 50-59.
[3]	杨超, 刘敏竹, 李强, 韩涛, 彭良志, 凌丽俐, 付行政, 淳长品, 曹立, 何义仲. 发光二极管(LED)光质对金秋砂糖橘幼苗生长发育和光合特性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(1): 89-97.
[4]	董智豪, 陈宇, 黄高想, 白俊艳, 李静云, 赵淑娟, 雷莹, 王新乐, 胡琦杭, 范征宇. 蛋用鹌鹑的VIPR-1基因的多态性与早期生长性状的关联分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(8): 1393-1401.
[5]	周贝宁, 毛恋, 花壮壮, 芦建国. 碱性盐胁迫对夏蜡梅光合荧光特性影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(8): 1416-1425.
[6]	黄书超, 侯栋, 岳宏忠, 孔维萍, 张东琴, 李亚莉, 撖冬荣, 颉博杰. 三株促生菌及其混合微生物菌剂对莴笋生长和品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(7): 1212-1221.
[7]	侯立娟, 李正鹏, 林金盛, 马林, 李辉平, 曲绍轩, 姜建新, 邹秀龙, 杨华平, 李长田, 蒋宁. 不同光质LED光照对草菇菌丝生长速度、菌丝分支与生物量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(6): 1110-1116.
[8]	王铁, 黄胜佳, 杨友婷, 谭丽平, 邱霞, 董甜甜, 黎思辰, 孙国超, 熊博, 王均, 汪志辉. 不同中间砧对媛小春柑橘生长与光合特性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(3): 413-421.
[9]	程安东, 汪本勤. 金寨县桑黄的菌种鉴定与生长特性研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(12): 2234-2244.
[10]	葛金涛, 王江英, 赵文静, 邵小斌, 朱朋波, 汤雪燕, 孙明伟, 刘兴满. 魏可葡萄气生根发育的转录组分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(9): 1645-1655.
[11]	陈天, 包宁颖, 杜崇宣, 刘云根. 不同砷污染程度下香蒲生长与砷富集特征[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(9): 1672-1682.
[12]	许娜, 王大海, 杜传印, 杜沙沙, 王晓萌, 张彦, 张玉琴, 吴元华, 管恩森, 石屹. 株距对烟苗生长发育的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(8): 1342-1350.
[13]	兰挚谦, 张凯歌, 张雪艳. 耕层厚度对黄瓜叶片光合荧光与根系生理特性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(7): 1196-1205.
[14]	刘连忠, 李孟杰, 宁井铭. 基于时序巡航图像的茶树生长监测研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(5): 886-896.
[15]	白俊艳, 卢军浩, 付学言, 武晓红, 杨又兵, 雷莹, 庞有志, 卢小宁, 巩慧荣, 胡陆星, 刘红涛, 樊红灯, 曹恒, 时坤鹏, 陈梦柯, 马永康. 蛋用鹌鹑IGF-1R基因的多态性与体尺性状相关性分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(3): 398-405.