浙江农业学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (11): 2428-2437.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2022.11.12
张健利1,2,3(), 王振华1,2,3,*(
), 陈睿1,2,3, 王东旺1,2,3, 梁永辉1,2,3, 刘茹华1,2,3
收稿日期:
2022-01-19
出版日期:
2022-11-25
发布日期:
2022-11-29
通讯作者:
王振华
作者简介:
*王振华,E-mail:wzh2002027@163.com基金资助:
ZHANG Jianli1,2,3(), WANG Zhenhua1,2,3,*(
), CHEN Rui1,2,3, WANG Dongwang1,2,3, LIANG Yonghui1,2,3, LIU Ruhua1,2,3
Received:
2022-01-19
Online:
2022-11-25
Published:
2022-11-29
Contact:
WANG Zhenhua
摘要:
以成龄红枣为试验材料,设置2个灌溉水平(W1,6 000 m3·hm-2;W2,6 600 m3·hm-2)和3个基肥水平(S1、S2、S3,生物有机肥施用量分别为1 200、1 650、2 100 kg·hm-2),以不施用生物有机肥的作为对照(W1CK,W2CK),共8个处理,开展田间试验。结果表明:同一灌溉水平下,随生物有机肥施用量的增加,红枣梢长、梢粗、叶绿素相对含量、果实形态,及0~150 cm土壤有效钾、速效磷、铵态氮含量逐渐增加。在相同生物有机肥施用量下,随灌水量增加,0~150 cm土壤有效钾、速效磷、铵态氮含量减少。与对照(CK)相比,W1和W2灌溉水平下施用生物有机肥处理的单株产量分别增加4.65%~19.83%和8.17%~19.08%。施加生物有机肥可提高红枣的总糖、维生素C、可溶性固形物含量,降低总酸含量。各处理对比,W1S3处理的果实形态、单株产量和品质指标均不劣于W2CK处理。基于新疆干旱少雨的气候特点,在6 000 m3·hm-2的灌溉水平下配施2 100 kg·hm-2的生物有机肥,可替代当地常规灌溉施肥方案,较适宜于南疆干旱地区的红枣种植。
中图分类号:
张健利, 王振华, 陈睿, 王东旺, 梁永辉, 刘茹华. 水肥互作对滴灌红枣产量、品质与土壤养分的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(11): 2428-2437.
ZHANG Jianli, WANG Zhenhua, CHEN Rui, WANG Dongwang, LIANG Yonghui, LIU Ruhua. Effect of water-fertilizer interaction on yield, quality and soil nutrients of drip irrigated jujube[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(11): 2428-2437.
图1 不同处理对滴灌红枣梢长和梢粗的影响 柱上无相同字母的表示处理间差异显著(P<0.05)。下同。
Fig.1 Effect of different treatments on branch length and width of drip irrigated jujube Bars marked without the same letters indicated significant difference at P<0.05. The same as below.
灌溉水平 Irrigation level | 基肥水平 Base fertilizer level | 叶绿素含量(SPAD值)Chlorophyll content (SPAD value) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
新稍期 New shoot stage | 花期 Florescence | 果实膨大期 Fruit expansion stage | 完熟期 Full ripen stage | ||
W1 | CK | 23.60±0.82 e | 30.60±1.08 f | 46.43±1.29 f | 35.83±1.22 e |
S1 | 24.13±0.65 de | 31.60±0.66 ef | 47.93±0.84 ef | 37.23±0.85 de | |
S2 | 24.83±0.45 cde | 32.43±0.55 de | 49.33±0.96 de | 38.40±1.41 d | |
S3 | 25.17±0.68 bcd | 34.77±1.31 bc | 50.63±0.84 cd | 39.00±0.85 cd | |
W2 | CK | 25.00±0.66 cd | 33.43±1.01 cd | 49.73±1.04 de | 38.93±0.61 cd |
S1 | 25.70±0.60 abc | 35.07±0.55 bc | 52.30±0.53 c | 40.23±0.99 bc | |
S2 | 26.40±1.15 ab | 35.53±0.86 ab | 54.20±1.04 b | 41.53±0.55 ab | |
S3 | 26.67±0.65 a | 36.80±0.95 a | 57.67±0.78 a | 43.03±1.03 a |
表1 不同处理下红枣不同生育期的叶绿素相对含量(SPAD值)
Table 1 Relative chlorophyll content (SPAD value) of jujube at different growth period under different treatments
灌溉水平 Irrigation level | 基肥水平 Base fertilizer level | 叶绿素含量(SPAD值)Chlorophyll content (SPAD value) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
新稍期 New shoot stage | 花期 Florescence | 果实膨大期 Fruit expansion stage | 完熟期 Full ripen stage | ||
W1 | CK | 23.60±0.82 e | 30.60±1.08 f | 46.43±1.29 f | 35.83±1.22 e |
S1 | 24.13±0.65 de | 31.60±0.66 ef | 47.93±0.84 ef | 37.23±0.85 de | |
S2 | 24.83±0.45 cde | 32.43±0.55 de | 49.33±0.96 de | 38.40±1.41 d | |
S3 | 25.17±0.68 bcd | 34.77±1.31 bc | 50.63±0.84 cd | 39.00±0.85 cd | |
W2 | CK | 25.00±0.66 cd | 33.43±1.01 cd | 49.73±1.04 de | 38.93±0.61 cd |
S1 | 25.70±0.60 abc | 35.07±0.55 bc | 52.30±0.53 c | 40.23±0.99 bc | |
S2 | 26.40±1.15 ab | 35.53±0.86 ab | 54.20±1.04 b | 41.53±0.55 ab | |
S3 | 26.67±0.65 a | 36.80±0.95 a | 57.67±0.78 a | 43.03±1.03 a |
灌溉水平 Irrigation level | 基肥水平 Base fertilizer level | 有效钾 Available potassium | 速效磷 Available phosphorus | 铵态氮 Ammonium nitrogen |
---|---|---|---|---|
W1 | CK | 60.90±5.97 cd | 20.14±1.75 cd | 0.81±0.07 cd |
S1 | 69.86±8.68 bc | 22.11±1.18 bcd | 1.12±0.29 abc | |
S2 | 79.26±9.07 ab | 26.01±3.54 abc | 1.25±0.13 ab | |
S3 | 83.51±4.29 a | 28.59±5.32 a | 1.40±0.26 a | |
W2 | CK | 52.20±6.17 d | 17.20±1.94 d | 0.75±0.11 d |
S1 | 59.85±3.56 cd | 21.57±3.71 bcd | 1.01±0.16 bcd | |
S2 | 70.09±7.09 bc | 25.28±2.07 abc | 1.26±0.10 ab | |
S3 | 76.45±3.23 ab | 26.58±3.21 ab | 1.46±0.19 a |
表2 不同处理对枣田土壤养分的影响
Table 2 Effect of different treatments on soil nutrients mg·kg-1
灌溉水平 Irrigation level | 基肥水平 Base fertilizer level | 有效钾 Available potassium | 速效磷 Available phosphorus | 铵态氮 Ammonium nitrogen |
---|---|---|---|---|
W1 | CK | 60.90±5.97 cd | 20.14±1.75 cd | 0.81±0.07 cd |
S1 | 69.86±8.68 bc | 22.11±1.18 bcd | 1.12±0.29 abc | |
S2 | 79.26±9.07 ab | 26.01±3.54 abc | 1.25±0.13 ab | |
S3 | 83.51±4.29 a | 28.59±5.32 a | 1.40±0.26 a | |
W2 | CK | 52.20±6.17 d | 17.20±1.94 d | 0.75±0.11 d |
S1 | 59.85±3.56 cd | 21.57±3.71 bcd | 1.01±0.16 bcd | |
S2 | 70.09±7.09 bc | 25.28±2.07 abc | 1.26±0.10 ab | |
S3 | 76.45±3.23 ab | 26.58±3.21 ab | 1.46±0.19 a |
灌溉水平 Irrigation level | 基肥水平 Base fertilizer level | 果实纵径 Fruit longitudinal diameter/cm | 果实横径 Fruit equatorial diameter/cm | 单果质量 Single fruit weight/g | 单株产量 Yield per tree/kg |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
W1 | CK | 48.29±0.87 e | 33.22±0.75 e | 15.55±0.58 e | 4.14±0.36 d |
S1 | 49.52±0.95 de | 33.92±0.60 de | 15.97±1.11 e | 4.33±0.25 cd | |
S2 | 49.64±1.07 de | 34.10±0.56 cde | 16.34±0.64 de | 4.44±0.32 cd | |
S3 | 52.13±0.32 bc | 35.22±0.45 c | 17.95±0.18 c | 4.96±0.22 b | |
W2 | CK | 50.71±0.80 cd | 34.91±1.10 cd | 17.40±0.67 cd | 4.67±0.21 bc |
S1 | 53.20±0.85 b | 36.72±0.44 b | 19.30±0.31 b | 5.05±0.19 b | |
S2 | 54.83±0.79 a | 37.96±0.53 a | 20.53±0.87 a | 5.52±0.31 a | |
S3 | 54.88±0.78 a | 38.69±0.34 a | 20.65±0.53 a | 5.56±0.22 a |
表3 不同处理下的红枣果实形态与产量
Table 3 Fruit morphology and yield of jujube under different treatments
灌溉水平 Irrigation level | 基肥水平 Base fertilizer level | 果实纵径 Fruit longitudinal diameter/cm | 果实横径 Fruit equatorial diameter/cm | 单果质量 Single fruit weight/g | 单株产量 Yield per tree/kg |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
W1 | CK | 48.29±0.87 e | 33.22±0.75 e | 15.55±0.58 e | 4.14±0.36 d |
S1 | 49.52±0.95 de | 33.92±0.60 de | 15.97±1.11 e | 4.33±0.25 cd | |
S2 | 49.64±1.07 de | 34.10±0.56 cde | 16.34±0.64 de | 4.44±0.32 cd | |
S3 | 52.13±0.32 bc | 35.22±0.45 c | 17.95±0.18 c | 4.96±0.22 b | |
W2 | CK | 50.71±0.80 cd | 34.91±1.10 cd | 17.40±0.67 cd | 4.67±0.21 bc |
S1 | 53.20±0.85 b | 36.72±0.44 b | 19.30±0.31 b | 5.05±0.19 b | |
S2 | 54.83±0.79 a | 37.96±0.53 a | 20.53±0.87 a | 5.52±0.31 a | |
S3 | 54.88±0.78 a | 38.69±0.34 a | 20.65±0.53 a | 5.56±0.22 a |
灌溉水平 Irrigation level | 基肥水平 Base fertilizer level | 总糖 Total sugar/% | 可溶性固形物 Total soluble solid/% | 总酸 Total acidity/% | 维生素C Vitamin C/(mg·kg-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
W1 | CK | 27.04±0.15 e | 29.21±0.44 e | 0.120±0.017 bcd | 630.2±10.6 e |
S1 | 27.72±0.59 d | 29.68±0.63 de | 0.117±0.024 bcd | 654.2±26.3 de | |
S2 | 28.25±0.36 cd | 30.08±0.62 cd | 0.107±0.020 cd | 681.4±20.8 d | |
S3 | 29.39±0.23 b | 31.50±0.56 b | 0.091±0.011 d | 755.9±16.5 bc | |
W2 | CK | 28.66±0.23 c | 30.56±0.31 c | 0.167±0.030 a | 731.2±12.2 c |
S1 | 29.92±0.53 ab | 31.98±0.46 ab | 0.154±0.029 ab | 790.2±23.6 b | |
S2 | 30.48±0.29 a | 32.48±0.27a | 0.137±0.019 abc | 827.0±19.5 a | |
S3 | 30.49±0.16 a | 32.51±0.23 a | 0.121±0.020 bcd | 834.7±26.3 a |
表4 不同处理对红枣品质的影响
Table 4 Effect of different treatments on jujube quality
灌溉水平 Irrigation level | 基肥水平 Base fertilizer level | 总糖 Total sugar/% | 可溶性固形物 Total soluble solid/% | 总酸 Total acidity/% | 维生素C Vitamin C/(mg·kg-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
W1 | CK | 27.04±0.15 e | 29.21±0.44 e | 0.120±0.017 bcd | 630.2±10.6 e |
S1 | 27.72±0.59 d | 29.68±0.63 de | 0.117±0.024 bcd | 654.2±26.3 de | |
S2 | 28.25±0.36 cd | 30.08±0.62 cd | 0.107±0.020 cd | 681.4±20.8 d | |
S3 | 29.39±0.23 b | 31.50±0.56 b | 0.091±0.011 d | 755.9±16.5 bc | |
W2 | CK | 28.66±0.23 c | 30.56±0.31 c | 0.167±0.030 a | 731.2±12.2 c |
S1 | 29.92±0.53 ab | 31.98±0.46 ab | 0.154±0.029 ab | 790.2±23.6 b | |
S2 | 30.48±0.29 a | 32.48±0.27a | 0.137±0.019 abc | 827.0±19.5 a | |
S3 | 30.49±0.16 a | 32.51±0.23 a | 0.121±0.020 bcd | 834.7±26.3 a |
指标Index | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B | 0.959** | |||||||||
C | 0.912** | 0.957** | ||||||||
D | 0.236 | 0.469 | 0.580 | |||||||
E | 0.232 | 0.472 | 0.574 | 0.996** | ||||||
F | 0.160 | 0.399 | 0.517 | 0.993** | 0.992** | |||||
G | -0.879** | -0.761* | -0.644 | 0.195 | 0.177 | 0.257 | ||||
H | 0.217 | 0.452 | 0.577 | 0.988** | 0.991** | 0.988** | 0.188 | |||
I | 0.160 | 0.387 | 0.538 | 0.958** | 0.958** | 0.968** | 0.239 | 0.982** | ||
J | 0.139 | 0.383 | 0.509 | 0.978** | 0.982** | 0.988** | 0.260 | 0.993** | 0.991** | |
K | 0.166 | 0.400 | 0.533 | 0.984** | 0.983** | 0.994** | 0.245 | 0.990** | 0.989** | 0.995** |
表5 土壤养分与红枣品质、产量等指标间相关性
Table 5 Correlations of soil nutrients and jujube quality and yield
指标Index | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B | 0.959** | |||||||||
C | 0.912** | 0.957** | ||||||||
D | 0.236 | 0.469 | 0.580 | |||||||
E | 0.232 | 0.472 | 0.574 | 0.996** | ||||||
F | 0.160 | 0.399 | 0.517 | 0.993** | 0.992** | |||||
G | -0.879** | -0.761* | -0.644 | 0.195 | 0.177 | 0.257 | ||||
H | 0.217 | 0.452 | 0.577 | 0.988** | 0.991** | 0.988** | 0.188 | |||
I | 0.160 | 0.387 | 0.538 | 0.958** | 0.958** | 0.968** | 0.239 | 0.982** | ||
J | 0.139 | 0.383 | 0.509 | 0.978** | 0.982** | 0.988** | 0.260 | 0.993** | 0.991** | |
K | 0.166 | 0.400 | 0.533 | 0.984** | 0.983** | 0.994** | 0.245 | 0.990** | 0.989** | 0.995** |
[1] | 孙晓莉, 田寿乐, 沈广宁, 等. 山东省4种主要干果的产业现状及发展对策[J]. 河北科技师范学院学报, 2017, 31(3): 56-60. |
SUN X L, TIAN S L, SHEN G N, et al. Current situation and development countermeasures of dried fruit industry in Shandong Province[J]. Journal of Hebei Normal University of Science & Technology, 2017, 31(3): 56-60. (in Chinese) | |
[2] | 宁强. 我国枣主产区发展现状及土地可持续利用分析[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2016, 37(7): 130-134. |
NING Q. Analysis on the current situation and sustainable development of Chinese jujube main producing areas[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2016, 37(7): 130-134. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[3] | 曲成闯, 陈效民, 张志龙, 等. 生物有机肥提高设施土壤生产力减缓黄瓜连作障碍的机制[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2019, 25(5): 814-823. |
QU C C, CHEN X M, ZHANG Z L, et al. Mechanism of bio-organic fertilizer on improving soil productivity for continuous cucumber in greenhouse[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2019, 25(5): 814-823. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[4] |
孙家骏, 付青霞, 谷洁, 等. 生物有机肥对猕猴桃土壤酶活性和微生物群落的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(3): 829-837.
DOI |
SUN J J, FU Q X, GU J, et al. Effects of bio-organic fertilizer on soil enzyme activities and microbial community in kiwifruit orchard[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016, 27(3): 829-837. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[5] | 闫鹏科, 常少刚, 孙权, 等. 施用生物有机肥对枸杞产量、品质及土壤肥力的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2019(5): 112-118. |
YAN P K, CHANG S G, SUN Q, et al. Effect of bio-organic fertilizer on yield, quality and soil fertility of wolfberry[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2019(5): 112-118. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[6] | 李停锋, 李雯, 郭君钰, 等. 生物有机肥对连作压砂田土壤肥力及西瓜品质的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2020(5): 109-116. |
LI T F, LI W, GUO J Y, et al. Effects of bio-organic fertilizer on soil fertility and watermelon quality in continuous cropping sand pressing field[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2020(5): 109-116. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[7] | HABASHY N R, ABOU A W, ZAKI R N. Effect of organic and bio-fertilizers on phosphorus and some micronutrients availability in a calcareous soil[J]. Research Journal of Agriculture & Biological Sciences, 2008, 4(5): 545-552. |
[8] |
LI Z Y, ZONG R, WANG T Y, et al. Adapting root distribution and improving water use efficiency via drip irrigation in a jujube (Zizyphus jujuba Mill.) orchard after long-term flood irrigation[J]. Agriculture, 2021, 11(12): 1184.
DOI URL |
[9] |
石培君, 刘洪光, 何新林, 等. 水肥耦合对滴灌矮化密植大枣生理变化及产量影响[J]. 核农学报, 2018, 32(1): 177-187.
DOI |
SHI P J, LIU H G, HE X L, et al. The influence of water and fertilizer coupling on physiological change and yield of dwarf dense planting jujube under drip irrigation[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 32(1): 177-187. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[10] | 周罕觅, 张富仓, KJELGREN R, 等. 水肥耦合对苹果幼树产量、品质和水肥利用的效应[J]. 农业机械学报, 2015, 46(12): 173-183. |
ZHOU H M, ZHANG F C, KJELGREN R, et al. Effects of water and fertilizer coupling on yield, fruit quality and water and fertilizer use efficiency of young apple tree[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2015, 46(12): 173-183. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[11] | 柴仲平, 王雪梅, 孙霞, 等. 水氮耦合对枣树生长与产量的影响[J]. 水土保持研究, 2012, 19(2): 201-204. |
CHAI Z P, WANG X M, SUN X, et al. Influence on growth and yield of Zizyphus jujuba under coupling of water and nitrogen[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2012, 19(2): 201-204. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[12] | 李彦君, 庄丽, 徐红军, 等. 水氮耦合对北疆地区春小麦光合特性及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2013, 50(2): 204-213. |
LI Y J, ZHUANG L, XU H J, et al. Effects of water-nitrogen coupling on photosynthetic characteristics and yield of spring wheat in northern Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 50(2): 204-213. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[13] | 杜清洁, 李建明, 潘铜华, 等. 滴灌条件下水肥耦合对番茄产量及综合品质的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2015, 33(3): 10-17. |
DU Q J, LI J M, PAN T H, et al. The compound effects of water and fertilizer on yield and quality of tomato under drip irrigation[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2015, 33(3): 10-17. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[14] |
王士杰, 尹光华, 李忠, 等. 浅埋滴灌水肥耦合对辽西半干旱区春玉米产量的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(1): 139-147.
DOI |
WANG S J, YIN G H, LI Z, et al. Effects of water-fertilizer coupling on the yield of spring maize under shallow-buried drip irrigation in semi-arid region of western Liaoning Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 31(1): 139-147. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[15] |
YU Q G, YE J, YANG S N, et al. Effects of nitrogen application level on rice nutrient uptake and ammonia volatilization[J]. Rice Science, 2013, 20(2): 139-147.
DOI URL |
[16] | 徐国伟, 王贺正, 翟志华, 等. 不同水氮耦合对水稻根系形态生理、产量与氮素利用的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2015, 31(10): 132-141. |
XU G W, WANG H Z, ZHAI Z H, et al. Effect of water and nitrogen coupling on root morphology and physiology, yield and nutrition utilization for rice[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2015, 31(10): 132-141. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[17] | 钟松, 高俊程, 董世魁, 等. 黄河源区高寒草原土壤对不同PGPR菌肥的响应[J]. 兰州大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 57(3): 294-301. |
ZHONG S, GAO J C, DONG S K, et al. The response of alpine grassland soil to different PGPR bacterial fertilizers in the source region of the Yellow River[J]. Journal of Lanzhou University (Natural Sciences), 2021, 57(3): 294-301. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[18] | 王振华, 扁青永, 李文昊, 等. 南疆沙区成龄红枣水肥一体化滴灌的水肥适宜用量[J]. 农业工程学报, 2018, 34(11): 96-104. |
WANG Z H, BIAN Q Y, LI W H, et al. Suitable water and fertilizer amount for mature jujube with drip-irrigation under fertigation in southern Xinjiang sandy area[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2018, 34(11): 96-104. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[19] | 车银伟, 杨器, 代顺冬, 等. 涌泉根灌对山地红枣产量与品质的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2013, 22(11): 108-113. |
CHE Y W, YANG Q, DAI S D, et al. Effects of bubble-root irrigation on yield and quality of jujube in hills[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Occidentalis Sinica, 2013, 22(11): 108-113. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[20] |
姜莉莉, 王开运, 武玉国, 等. 施用生物有机肥对番茄果实品质及土壤生物学特性的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2020, 35(6): 141-147.
DOI |
JIANG L L, WANG K Y, WU Y G, et al. Effect of application of bioorganic fertilizer on tomatoes fruit quality and soil biological characteristics[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2020, 35(6): 141-147. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI |
|
[21] | 王亚雄, 常少刚, 王锐, 等. 不同有机肥对宁夏枸杞生长、产量及品质的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2019(5): 91-95. |
WANG Y X, CHANG S G, WANG R, et al. Effects of different organic fertilizers on growth, yield and quality of Lycium barbarum L[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2019(5): 91-95. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[22] | 陈会鲜, 曹升, 严华兵, 等. 增施生物有机肥对食用木薯产量及品质的影响[J]. 热带作物学报, 2019, 40(3): 417-424. |
CHEN H X, CAO S, YAN H B, et al. The effect of increasing bio-organic fertilizer on the yield and quality of edible-cassava[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2019, 40(3): 417-424. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[23] | 杨云高, 王树林, 刘国, 等. 生物有机肥对烤烟产质量及土壤改良的影响[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2012, 33(4): 70-74. |
YANG Y G, WANG S L, LIU G, et al. Effects of bio-organic fertilizer on yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco and soil improvement[J]. Chinese Tobacco Science, 2012, 33(4): 70-74. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[24] | 陈新斌, 孙锦, 郭世荣, 等. 海水胁迫对菠菜叶绿素代谢的影响[J]. 西北植物学报, 2012, 32(9): 1781-1787. |
CHEN X B, SUN J, GUO S R, et al. Chlorophyll metabolism of spinach leaves under seawater stress[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2012, 32(9): 1781-1787. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[25] | 臧小平, 周兆禧, 林兴娥, 等. 不同用量有机肥对芒果果实品质及土壤肥力的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2016(1): 98-101. |
ZANG X P, ZHOU Z X, LIN X G, et al. Effects of different organic manure application rate on mango fruit quality and soil fertility[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2016(1): 98-101. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[26] | 张绪美, 曹亚茹, 沈文忠, 等. 微生物肥对设施土壤次生盐渍化和番茄生产的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2019(5): 119-126. |
ZHANG X M, CAO Y R, SHEN W Z, et al. Effects of microbial fertilizer on soil secondary salinization and tomato production in protected cultivation[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2019(5): 119-126. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[27] | 任玉忠, 王水献, 谢蕾, 等. 干旱区不同灌溉方式对枣树水分利用效率和果实品质的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2012, 28(22): 95-102. |
REN Y Z, WANG S X, XIE L, et al. Effects of irrigation methods on water use efficiency and fruit quality of jujube in arid area[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2012, 28(22): 95-102. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[28] | 叶胜兰, 刘天成. 不同滴灌制度对陕北山地梨枣产量及水分利用效率的影响[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2018, 37(1): 28-34. |
YE S L, LIU T C. Effects of different drip irrigation systems on yield and water use efficiency of pear-jujube in the Loess Plateau[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2018, 37(1): 28-34. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[29] | 朱菜红, 董彩霞, 沈其荣, 等. 配施有机肥提高化肥氮利用效率的微生物作用机制研究[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2010, 16(2): 282-288. |
ZHU C H, DONG C X, SHEN Q R, et al. Microbial mechanism on enhancement of inorganic fertilizer-N use efficiency for combined use of inorganic and organic fertilizers[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2010, 16(2): 282-288. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 杨胜玲, 黄兴成, 李渝, 刘彦伶, 张雅蓉, 张艳, 张文安, 蒋太明. 长期有机无机肥配施对水稻生长、干物质积累及产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(9): 1815-1825. |
[2] | 茹朝, 郁继华, 武玥, 冯致, 缑兆辉, 金宁, 王舒亚, 刘泽慈, 吕剑. 化肥减量配施生物有机肥对露地大白菜产量及品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(8): 1626-1637. |
[3] | 李旺雄, 张洋, 唐中祺, 郁继华. 平衡施肥对设施基质栽培番茄生长、品质、矿质元素含量与产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(8): 1648-1660. |
[4] | 邹振浩, 孙业良, 赵玉宝, 李鑫, 张丽平, 张兰, 董春旺, 付建玉, 韩文炎, 颜鹏. 采摘花芽对春茶产量与品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(7): 1369-1376. |
[5] | 朱诗君, 金树权, 姚红燕, 徐志豪, 罗幼君, 陈若霞. 不同基肥及追肥配比对凤梨生长、产量和品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(6): 1217-1226. |
[6] | 朱铭, 刘琛, 林义成, 郭彬, 李华, 傅庆林. 不同调理剂组合对浙江红壤土壤肥力、微生物群落多样性和水稻产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(6): 1258-1267. |
[7] | 叶迎, 赵考诚, 马军, 祝轲, 庄恒扬. 播期和施氮量组合对水稻南粳9108产量和氮素利用的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(5): 879-886. |
[8] | 吴涛, 江小帆, 杨发荣, 魏玉明, 陈国顺, 蔡原, 焦婷, 黄杰, 赵生国. 日粮中不同藜麦添加水平对芦花鸡肉品质及微量元素的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(5): 897-907. |
[9] | 赵宇洪, 何文, 李根, 王强, 谢锐, 王燕, 陈清, 王小蓉. 四川地区琯溪蜜柚及其芽变品种的果实品质[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(5): 995-1004. |
[10] | 胡开博, 杨清夏, 李扬, 吴开贤, 赵平, 龙光强. 化肥减氮配施氨基酸肥料对春玉米生产的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(4): 661-670. |
[11] | 陈代良, 韩延超, 吴伟杰, 邓尚贵, 陈杭君, 郜海燕. 减振包装对双孢菇采后贮运品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(4): 801-807. |
[12] | 王慧茹, 李建设, 闫思华, 高艳明. 整枝方式对樱桃番茄冠层截获和荧光特性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(3): 525-533. |
[13] | 杨蕾, 洪林, 刘兆俊, 杨海健, 王武. 六个金柑品种果实品质与营养综合评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(3): 534-547. |
[14] | 孙文艳, 刘小刚, 张文慧, 李慧永, 吴朗, 杨启良, 熊国美. 基于根区土壤质量指数优化小粒种咖啡滴灌施肥方案[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(3): 566-573. |
[15] | 袁文雅, 康益晨, 杨昕宇, 张茹艳, 周春涛, 王勇, 陈喜鹏, 余慧芳, 秦舒浩. 清水苜蓿土壤浸提液对连作马铃薯根际土壤环境酶活性和微生物群落的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(2): 240-247. |
阅读次数 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
全文 705
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
摘要 456
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||