施加生物炭对黑土区坡耕地土壤主要理化指标的动态影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20231039

浙江农业学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (9): 2060-2069.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20231039

施加生物炭对黑土区坡耕地土壤主要理化指标的动态影响

武佳龙¹(), 迟铭², 高燕³, 王祥⁴, 沈海鸥¹^,^*()

1.吉林农业大学资源与环境学院,吉林长春 130118
2.丹东市水务服务中心,辽宁丹东 118100
3.松辽水利委员会松辽流域水土保持监测中心站,吉林长春 130021
4.中国农业大学土地科学与技术学院,北京 100193

收稿日期:2023-08-29 出版日期:2024-09-25 发布日期:2024-09-30
作者简介:*沈海鸥,E-mail:shensusan@163.com
武佳龙(1999—),男,甘肃陇西人,硕士研究生,主要从事水土保持研究。E-mail:wujialongswcr@163.com
通讯作者: *沈海鸥,E-mail:shensusan@163.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目(2021YFD1500700);国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFE0202900)

Effects of biochar application on soil physiochemical indicators at sloping farmland in black soil region

WU Jialong¹(), CHI Ming², GAO Yan³, WANG Xiang⁴, SHEN Haiou¹^,^*()

1. College of Resources and Environment, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China
2. Dandong Water Service Center, Dandong 118100, Liaoning, China
3. Songliao Soil and Water Conservation Monitoring Center Station of Songliao Water Resources Commission, Changchun 130021, China
4. College of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China

Received:2023-08-29 Online:2024-09-25 Published:2024-09-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

采用田间原位监测试验方法,设计CK(不施加生物炭)和SW(施加生物炭30 t·hm^-2)2个处理,研究施加生物炭当年(5—10月)对东北黑土区坡耕地土壤容重、土壤质量含水率、土壤pH值、电导率、有机质含量和阳离子交换量等主要理化指标的影响。结果表明,施加生物炭当年土壤容重降低,其中,6—10月垄丘土壤容重降低6.42%~11.21%,且随时间延长,其降幅减小。施加生物炭当年6—8月的土壤质量含水率降低,且垄丘的降低幅度小于垄沟,随坡位由上到下,土壤质量含水率的降幅逐渐减小;而9—10月的土壤质量含水率增加,且垄丘的增加幅度大于垄沟,随坡位由上到下,土壤质量含水率的增加幅度逐渐增大。此外,施加生物炭能够增加土壤pH值、有机质含量,减小电导率。综上,施加生物炭当年即可改变土壤主要理化指标,提升土壤质量。

关键词: 生物炭, 土壤容重, 土壤质量含水率, 土壤化学指标, 坡位, 黑土区

Abstract:

In the present study, an in-situ monitoring experiment was carried out at the sloping farmland to reveal the effects of biochar application during one year (from May to October) on soil bulk density, mass water content, pH, electrical conductivity, organic matter content and cation exchange capacity in black soil region, northeast China. Two experimental treatments were designed, including no biochar application (CK) and application of 30 t·hm^-2 biochar (SW). The results showed that biochar application during one year decreased soil bulk density. Compared to the CK, the soil bulk density of ridge mound was decreased by 6.42%-11.21% from June to October. The decrease range of soil bulk density was lowered with time. The biochar application decreased the soil mass water content from June to August, and the decrease range of ridge mound was smaller than that of ridge furrow. When the slope position was from top to bottom, the decrease range of soil mass water contents decreased gradually. However, the biochar application increased the soil mass water content from September to October, and the increase range of ridge mound was greater than that of ridge furrow. When the slope position was from top to bottom, the increase range of soil mass water content was elevated gradually. Furthermore, the biochar application increased soil pH, organic matter content yet decreased soil electrical conductivity. Therefore, biochar application during one year could change the typical soil physical and chemical indicators, hence improve soil quality.

Key words: biochar, soil bulk density, soil mass water content, soil chemistry indicator, slope position, black soil region

中图分类号:

S157.1

武佳龙, 迟铭, 高燕, 王祥, 沈海鸥. 施加生物炭对黑土区坡耕地土壤主要理化指标的动态影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(9): 2060-2069.

WU Jialong, CHI Ming, GAO Yan, WANG Xiang, SHEN Haiou. Effects of biochar application on soil physiochemical indicators at sloping farmland in black soil region[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(9): 2060-2069.

图/表 5

图1 试验小区照片(a)与采样位置示意图(b)

Fig.1 Experimental plot photo (a) and schematic diagram of sampling positions (b)

图2 施加生物炭对坡耕地土壤容重的影响 Effects of biochar application on soil bulk densities of sloping farmland 柱上无相同大写字母的表示相同月份、坡位下不同处理间差异显著(P<0.05),无相同小写字母的表示相同月份、处理下不同采样位置间差异显著(P<0.05)。

Fig.2 Bars marked without the same uppercase letters indicate significant (P<0.05) difference between treatments in the same month and same sampling position, while bars marked without the same lowercase letters indicate significant (P<0.05) difference within the sampling positions in the same month under the same treatment.

图3 不同处理坡耕地5—10月土壤(0~20 cm土层)质量含水率的变化

Fig.3 Changes of soil mass water content in 0-20 cm soil layer at sloping farmland from May to October under treatments

图4 不同处理坡耕地各土层的土壤质量含水率柱上无相同大写字母的表示相同月份、坡位和土层深度下不同处理间差异显著(P<0.05),无相同小写字母的表示相同处理、月份和坡位下不同土层间差异显著(P<0.05)。

Fig.4 Mass water contents of different soil layers in sloping farmland under treatments Bars marked without the same uppercase letters indicate significant (P<0.05) difference between treatments in the same month, same soil layer and same sampling position, while bars marked without the same lowercase letters indicate significant (P<0.05) difference within soil layers in the same month, sample sampling position under the same treatment.

表1 施加生物炭对坡耕地土壤化学指标的影响

Table 1 Effects of biochar application on soil chemical indicators of sloping farmland

采样时间 Sampling time	处理 Treatment	pH	EC/(mS·m^-1)	SOM/(g·kg^-1)	CEC/(cmol·kg^-1)
5月May	CK	5.79±0.04 Ab	0.91±0.07 Aa	23.03±0.99 Ab	18.38±1.09 Aa
	SW	5.60±0.03 Bc	0.97±0.04 Aa	21.38±0.33 Bc	18.23±0.15 Aa
8月August	CK	5.81±0.05 Bb	0.56±0.02 Ab	24.41±1.15 Bab	17.87±0.41 Aa
	SW	6.16±0.26 Ab	0.86±0.26 Aa	30.32±1.55 Ab	17.51±0.30 Ab
10月October	CK	6.06±0.14 Ba	0.66±0.09 Ab	26.63±2.05 Ba	18.45±0.17 Aa
	SW	6.45±0.06 Aa	0.50±0.02 Bb	41.60±3.48 Aa	18.68±0.51 Aa

参考文献 36

[1]	GUO Y Q, CHEN X T, WU Y Y, et al. Natural revegetation of a semiarid habitat alters taxonomic and functional diversity of soil microbial communities[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 635: 598-606.
[2]	LIU C, LIU G, DAN C X, et al. Variability in mollic epipedon thickness in response to soil erosion-deposition rates along slopes in Northeast China[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2023, 227: 105616.
[3]	王世豪, 徐新良, 黄麟, 等. 1980s-2010s东北农田土壤养分时空变化特征[J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(4): 865-875. DOI
	WANG S H, XU X L, HUANG L, et al. Spatial and temporal variations of soil nutrients of cropland in Northeast China from the 1980s to the 2010s[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2023, 34(4): 865-875. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI
[4]	张光辉, 杨扬, 刘瑛娜, 等. 东北黑土区土壤侵蚀研究进展与展望[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022, 36(2): 1-12.
	ZHANG G H, YANG Y, LIU Y N, et al. Advances and prospects of soil erosion research in the black soil region of Northeast China[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022, 36(2): 1-12. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]	蒋发辉, 钱泳其, 郭自春, 等. 基于Meta分析评价东北黑土地保护性耕作与深耕的区域适宜性:以作物产量为例[J]. 土壤学报, 2022, 59(4): 935-952.
	JIANG F H, QIAN Y Q, GUO Z C, et al. Evaluating the regional suitability of conservation tillage and deep tillage based on crop yield in the black soil of Northeast China: a meta-analysis[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2022, 59(4): 935-952. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]	李波, 景竹然, 魏新光, 等. 东北地区春玉米作物系数时空分布特征研究[J]. 农业机械学报, 2020, 51(4): 279-290.
	LI B, JING Z R, WEI X G, et al. Spatial and temporal distribution characteristics of spring maize coefficients in Northeast China[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2020, 51(4): 279-290. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]	方放, 王飞, 石祖梁, 等. 京津冀秸秆养分资源及秸秆焚烧气体污染物排放定量估算[J]. 农业工程学报, 2017, 33(3): 1-6.
	FANG F, WANG F, SHI Z L, et al. Quantitative estimation on straw nutrient resources and emission of pollutants from straw burning in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2017, 33(3): 1-6. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	XIE T, REDDY K R, WANG C W, et al. Characteristics and applications of biochar for environmental remediation: a review[J]. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 2015, 45(9): 939-969.
[9]	LUO Z R, YAO B, YANG X, et al. Novel insights into the adsorption of organic contaminants by biochar: a review[J]. Chemosphere, 2022, 287(Pt 2): 132113.
[10]	TAN X F, LIU Y G, ZENG G M, et al. Application of biochar for the removal of pollutants from aqueous solutions[J]. Chemosphere, 2015, 125: 70-85. DOI PMID
[11]	ZHANG M, CHENG G, FENG H, et al. Effects of straw and biochar amendments on aggregate stability, soil organic carbon, and enzyme activities in the Loess Plateau, China[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 2017, 24(11): 10108-10120. DOI PMID
[12]	魏永霞, 朱畑豫, 刘慧. 连年施加生物炭对黑土区土壤改良与玉米产量的影响[J]. 农业机械学报, 2022, 53(1): 291-301.
	WEI Y X, ZHU T Y, LIU H. Effects of successive application of biochar on soil improvement and maize yield of black soil region[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2022, 53(1): 291-301. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]	LU S G, SUN F F, ZONG Y T. Effect of rice husk biochar and coal fly ash on some physical properties of expansive clayey soil (Vertisol)[J]. CATENA, 2014, 114: 37-44.
[14]	龙杰琦, 苗淑杰, 李娜, 等. 施用生物炭对黑土各组分有机质结构的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2022, 28(5): 775-785.
	LONG J Q, MIAO S J, LI N, et al. Effects of biochar application on the structural properties of organic matter fractions in Mollisols[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2022, 28(5): 775-785. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]	孙莉英, 郑明国, 方海燕, 等. 漫川漫岗黑土区水土流失综合治理范式[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2012, 10(3): 43-49.
	SUN L Y, ZHENG M G, FANG H Y, et al. Paradigm of integrated soil and water conservation in rolling hill regions with black soil in Northeast China[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2012, 10(3): 43-49. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]	张兴义, 乔宝玲, 李健宇, 等. 降雨强度和坡度对东北黑土区顺坡垄体溅蚀特征的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(16): 110-117.
	ZHANG X Y, QIAO B L, LI J Y, et al. Effects of rainfall intensity and slope on splash erosion characteristics of downslope ridge on farmland in black soil areas of Northeast China[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2020, 36(16): 110-117. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]	吴昱, 刘慧, 杨爱峥, 等. 黑土区坡耕地施加生物炭对水土流失的影响[J]. 农业机械学报, 2018, 49(5): 287-294.
	WU Y, LIU H, YANG A Z, et al. Influences of biochar supply on water and soil erosion in slopping farm-land of black soil region[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2018, 49(5): 287-294. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]	耿明昕, 关松, 孟维山, 等. 秸秆还田与生物炭施用影响黑土有机质并缓解土壤酸化[J]. 吉林农业大学学报, 2023, 45(2): 178-187.
	GENG M X, GUAN S, MENG W S, et al. Effects of straw returning and biochar application on soil organic matter and mitigate soil acidification of black soil[J]. Journal of Jilin Agricultural University, 2023, 45(2): 178-187. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]	林洪羽, 周明华, 张博文, 等. 生物炭及秸秆长期施用对紫色土坡耕地土壤团聚体有机碳的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2020, 28(1): 96-103.
	LIN H Y, ZHOU M H, ZHANG B W, et al. Effect of long-term application of biochar and straw on soil organic carbon in purple soil aggregates of sloping uplands[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2020, 28(1): 96-103. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]	张健乐, 曾小英, 史东梅, 等. 生物炭对紫色土坡耕地侵蚀性耕层土壤有机碳的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2022, 43(4): 2209-2218.
	ZHANG J L, ZENG X Y, SHI D M, et al. Effects of biochar on soil organic carbon of eroded cultivated layer of slope farmland in purple hilly area[J]. Environmental Science, 2022, 43(4): 2209-2218. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]	张海晶, 王少杰, 田春杰, 等. 生物炭用量对东北黑土理化性质和溶解有机质特性的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2021, 52(6): 1384-1392.
	ZHANG H J, WANG S J, TIAN C J, et al. Biochar amounts effect on soil physicochemical properties and dissolved organic matter characteristics of black soil in northeastern China[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2021, 52(6): 1384-1392. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[22]	PENG X Y, TONG X G, HAO L T, et al. Applicability of biochar for limiting interrill erosion and organic carbon export of sloping cropland in a semi-arid area of China[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2019, 280: 68-76.
[23]	张紫薇, 赵文俊, 李奇, 等. 表层土壤结构对红壤坡耕地产流及产沙过程的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2024, 61(2): 434-444.
	ZHANG Z W, ZHAO W J, LI Q, et al. Effects of top soil structure on runoff and sediment yield of red soil slope cropland[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2024, 61(2): 434-444. (in Chinese)
[24]	LIU D D, SHE D. Flow hydraulic characteristics and dynamic erodibility of saline-sodic soil slopes for coastal areas under simulated rainfall conditions[J]. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 2020, 68: 646-660.
[25]	戴静, 刘阳生. 生物炭的性质及其在土壤环境中应用的研究进展[J]. 土壤通报, 2013, 44(6): 1520-1525.
	DAI J, LIU Y S. Review of research on the properties of biochar and its applications in soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2013, 44(6): 1520-1525. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26]	房彬, 李心清, 赵斌, 等. 生物炭对旱作农田土壤理化性质及作物产量的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2014, 23(8): 1292-1297.
	FANG B, LI X Q, ZHAO B, et al. Influence of biochar on soil physical and chemical properties and crop yields in rainfed field[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2014, 23(8): 1292-1297. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[27]	杨阳, 马绎皓, 赵鸿, 等. 甘肃省不同气候类型区土壤水分特性[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021, 35(5): 213-220.
	YANG Y, MA Y H, ZHAO H, et al. Soil moisture properties of different climate types in Gansu Province[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021, 35(5): 213-220. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[28]	李昌见, 屈忠义, 勾芒芒, 等. 生物炭对土壤水肥利用效率与番茄生长影响研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2014, 33(11): 2187-2193.
	LI C J, QU Z Y, GOU M M, et al. Effects of biochar amendment on soil water and nutrient utilization efficiencies and tomato growth[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2014, 33(11): 2187-2193. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[29]	张千丰, 王光华. 生物炭理化性质及对土壤改良效果的研究进展[J]. 土壤与作物, 2012, 1(4): 219-226.
	ZHANG Q F, WANG G H. Research progress of physiochemical properties of biochar and its effects as soil amendments[J]. Soil and Crop, 2012, 1(4): 219-226. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[30]	于庆峰, 苗庆丰, 史海滨, 等. 秸秆覆盖量对土壤温度和春玉米耗水规律及产量的影响[J]. 水土保持研究, 2018, 25(3): 111-116.
	YU Q F, MIAO Q F, SHI H B, et al. Effects of straw mulch rates on soil temperature, water use and yield of spring maize[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2018, 25(3): 111-116. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[31]	王艳阳, 魏永霞, 孙继鹏, 等. 不同生物炭施加量的土壤水分入渗及其分布特性[J]. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(8): 113-119.
	WANG Y Y, WEI Y X, SUN J P, et al. Soil water infiltration and distribution characteristics under different biochar addition amount[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2016, 32(8): 113-119. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[32]	王湛, 李银坤, 王利春, 等. 生物炭对有机菜心产量、品质及水分利用的影响[J]. 农业机械学报, 2018, 49(12): 273-280.
	WANG Z, LI Y K, WANG L C, et al. Effects of biochar on yield, quality and water utilization of organic flowering Chinese cabbage[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2018, 49(12): 273-280. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[33]	颜永毫, 郑纪勇, 张兴昌, 等. 生物炭添加对黄土高原典型土壤田间持水量的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2013, 27(4): 120-124.
	YAN Y H, ZHENG J Y, ZHANG X C, et al. Impact of biochar addition into typical soils on field capacity in Loess Plateau[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2013, 27(4): 120-124. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[34]	魏永霞, 张翼鹏, 张雨凤, 等. 黑土坡耕地连续施加生物炭的土壤改良和节水增产效应[J]. 农业机械学报, 2018, 49(2): 284-291.
	WEI Y X, ZHANG Y P, ZHANG Y F, et al. Influences of two consecutive years supply of biochar on soil improvement, water saving and yield increasing in sloping farmland of black soil region[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2018, 49(2): 284-291. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[35]	刘畅, 迟道才, 张丰, 等. 稻草生物炭对干湿交替稻田CH₄和N₂O排放的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2023, 39(14): 232-242.
	LIU C, CHI D C, ZHANG F, et al. Effects of rice straw biochar on CH₄ and N₂O emissions in alternating wetting and drying rice fields[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2023, 39(14): 232-242. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[36]	林智文, 张鹏, 吴天昊, 等. 秸秆直接还田与炭化还田对热带土壤-水稻系统氨挥发的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(12): 2689-2699. DOI
	LIN Z W, ZHANG P, WU T H, et al. Effects of straw and straw-derived biochar returning on ammonia volatilization in tropical soil-rice system[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(12): 2689-2699. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI

编辑推荐

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

689

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	423	0	0	266

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	622	67
比例	90%	10%

摘要

134

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

0	0	134

	来源	本网站

	次数	134
	比例	100%

施加生物炭对黑土区坡耕地土壤主要理化指标的动态影响

Effects of biochar application on soil physiochemical indicators at sloping farmland in black soil region

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 36

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	傅志强, 刘祯, 马春花, 温梦玲, 奚如春. 生物炭及炭基肥对土壤质量与植物生长的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(7): 1634-1645.
[2]	俞朝, 王音予, 刘奇珍, 王芸, 沈泓, 冯英. 不同原料生物炭与无机钝化剂配施对小白菜地上部镉积累和土壤镉钝化的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(3): 613-621.
[3]	韩静, 朱依婷, 郑驰, 马莉红, 张亚男, 曾秋艳, 刘书亮, 陈姝娟. 毛豆壳生物炭的活化及其对甲萘威的吸附性能[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(9): 2202-2211.
[4]	徐洋, 任奕林, 王浩杰, 黄秋航, 邢博源, 曹红亮. 不同制备条件下油菜秸秆生物炭用作缓释载体的综合评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(4): 893-902.
[5]	阮泽斌, 王兰鸽, 蓝王凯宁, 徐彦, 陈俊辉, 柳丹. 氮肥减量配施生物炭对水稻氮素吸收和土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(2): 394-402.
[6]	王薇薇, 梅燚, 吴永成, 万红建, 陈长军, 郑青松, 郑佳秋. 玉米芯生物炭对辣椒连作土壤性质和辣椒生长的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(1): 156-163.
[7]	崔文芳, 陈静, 鲁富宽, 秦丽, 秦德志, 王利平, 高聚林. 生物炭结合氮肥减量对玉米产量和氮效率的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(2): 248-254.
[8]	林智文, 张鹏, 吴天昊, 单颖, 邹刚华, 赵凤亮, 郑桂萍. 秸秆直接还田与炭化还田对热带土壤-水稻系统氨挥发的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(12): 2689-2699.
[9]	崔宁波, 生世玉. 粮食安全视角下的东北黑土区耕地生态补偿研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(9): 1759-1769.
[10]	吴佩聪, 张鹏, 单颖, 邹刚华, 丁哲利, 朱治强, 赵凤亮. 秸秆炭化还田对热带土壤-水稻体系氨挥发的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(4): 678-687.
[11]	徐民民, 黄莹, 李波, 徐艳, 张帅, 姚岭芸, 王政. 生物炭对小麦根际和根内微生物群落结构的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(3): 516-525.
[12]	周文志, 孙向阳, 李素艳, 张乐. 生物有机材料对滨海盐碱土的改良效果[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(4): 607-615.
[13]	黄惠群, 蔡文昌, 张健瑜, 李灿, 曾和平. 炭化温度对牛粪生物炭结构性质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(9): 1561-1568.
[14]	索桂芳, 吕豪豪, 汪玉瑛, 刘玉学, 何莉莉, 杨生茂. 炭基微生物肥料制备工艺及性质分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(7): 1218-1228.
[15]	王代懿, 张丰松, 潘娟, 刘登璐, 苟体忠. 水稻秸秆生物炭对雄烯二酮在土壤中吸附与降解行为的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(4): 632-639.