蜂胶油提物的制备及抗氧化活性研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20231418

浙江农业学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (10): 2338-2346.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20231418

蜂胶油提物的制备及抗氧化活性研究

彭正菊¹^,²(), 谌迪²(), 张岑², 卢文静², 喻宏应¹^,², 郭慧媛³, 蒋晗¹^,^*(), 肖朝耿²^,^*()

1.中国计量大学生命科学学院,浙江杭州 310018
2.浙江省农业科学院食品科学研究所,浙江杭州 310021
3.中国农业大学食品科学与营养工程学院,北京 100083

收稿日期:2023-12-20 出版日期:2024-10-25 发布日期:2024-10-30
作者简介:彭正菊(1999—),女,重庆人,硕士研究生,研究方向为蜂胶的活性研究与应用。E-mail: pengzj1127@163.com;
湛迪(1987—),男,湖北武汉人,博士,助理研究员,研究方向为功能性食品配料。E-mail:cd0sindy@163.com第一联系人：
^#为共同第一作者
通讯作者: ^*蒋晗,E-mail: jianghan825@126.com;肖朝耿,E-mail: xiaochaogeng@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(32201930);浙江省农业科学院国际合作/港澳台专项经费资助项目(蜂胶油凝胶的制备及功效机理研究)

Preparation and antioxidant activity of propolis oil extracts

PENG Zhengju¹^,²(), CHEN Di²(), ZHANG Cen², LU Wenjing², YU Hongying¹^,², GUO Huiyuan³, JIANG Han¹^,^*(), XIAO Chaogeng²^,^*()

1. College of Life Sciences, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou 310018, China
2. Institute of Food Science, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310021, China
3. College of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083,China

Received:2023-12-20 Online:2024-10-25 Published:2024-10-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

蜂胶是一种良好的药食两用天然产品,具有广泛的生物活性。为探索山茶油提取对蜂胶中活性成分及抗氧化活性的影响,该研究以总黄酮为评价指标,通过单因素及响应面实验获得蜂胶提取最佳工艺条件,并对油提物的DPPH清除能力和铁离子还原能力等抗氧化活性进行了评价,最后以蜂胶中典型的脂溶性高良姜素为例,利用分子对接对其抗氧化活性机制进行了探究。结果表明,提取的最佳工艺为: 温度41 ℃,液固比16∶1 mL·g^-1, 提取时间31 h,此时总黄酮的含量为35.59 mg·g^-1。在该工艺下获得的油提物对DPPH清除率的IC₅₀值为12.48 μg·mL^-1,总抗氧化能力(FRAP)为3.70 mmol·g^-1。此外,分子对接结果表明,蜂胶中典型脂溶性成分高良姜素与蜂胶的抗氧化作用密切相关。

关键词: 蜂胶, 总黄酮, 响应面, 抗氧化, 分子对接

Abstract:

Propolis is a good medicinal and edible natural product, which have a wide range of biological activities. The purpose of this study was to explore the effect of camellia oil extraction on the active components and antioxidant activity in propolis. Firstly, total flavonoids were used as the evaluation index, this study obtained the optimal process conditions for propolis extraction by one-way and response surface experiments. Then, we evaluated the antioxidant activity of the oil extracts including DPPH scavenging ability and ferric iron reduction ability. Finally, the mechanism of the antioxidant activity of galangin, a typical fat-soluble compound in propolis, was investigated using molecular docking was explored. The results showed that the optimal process was as follows: extraction temperature 41 ℃, liquid-solid ratio 16∶1 mL·g^-1, extraction time 31 h, at which the content of total flavonoids was 35.59 mg·g^-1. The IC₅₀ value of the oil extracts obtained under this process was 12.48 μg·mL^-1 for DPPH scavenging, and the total antioxidant capacity(FRAP) was 3.70 mmol·g^-1. In addition, the molecular docking results indicated that galangin, a typical fat-soluble component of propolis, was closely related to the antioxidant effect of propolis.

Key words: propolis, total flavonoids, Box-Behnken response surface, antioxidant, molecular docking

中图分类号:

TS201

彭正菊, 谌迪, 张岑, 卢文静, 喻宏应, 郭慧媛, 蒋晗, 肖朝耿. 蜂胶油提物的制备及抗氧化活性研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(10): 2338-2346.

PENG Zhengju, CHEN Di, ZHANG Cen, LU Wenjing, YU Hongying, GUO Huiyuan, JIANG Han, XIAO Chaogeng. Preparation and antioxidant activity of propolis oil extracts[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(10): 2338-2346.

图/表 13

表1 单因素试验设计

Table 1 Single factor experimental design

水平 Level	因素Factor
水平 Level	提取温度 Extraction temperature/℃	液固比 Liquid-solid ratio/(mL·g^-1)	提取时间 Extraction time/h
1	25	5∶1	18
2	30	10∶1	24
3	35	15∶1	30
4	40	20∶1	36
5	45	25∶1	42

表2 响应面试验设计

Table 2 Response surface experimental design

水平 Level	因素Factor
水平 Level	A:提取温度 Extraction temperature/℃	B:液固比 Liquid-solid ratio/(mL·g^-1)	C:提取时间 Extraction time/h
-1	35	10∶1	24
0	40	15∶1	30
1	45	20∶1	36

图1 槲皮素标准曲线

Fig.1 Quercetin standard curve

图2 温度对总黄酮含量的影响

Fig.2 Effect of temperature on total flavonoids content

图3 液固比对总黄酮含量的影响

Fig.3 Effect of liquid-solid ratio on total flavonoids content

图4 时间对总黄酮含量的影响

Fig.4 Effect of time on total flavonoids content

表3 响应面试验的设计及结果

Table 3 Design and results of the response surface test

序号 ID	A:温度 θ/℃	B:液固比 Liquid-solid ratio/(mL·g^-1)	C:时间 t/h	R总黄酮含量 Total flavonoids content/(mg·g^-1)
1	0	-1	1	26.07
2	0	1	-1	35.78
3	-1	-1	0	35.47
4	-1	1	0	30.50
5	0	0	0	29.63
6	0	0	0	33.08
7	0	0	0	30.07
8	0	-1	-1	35.15
9	1	-1	0	29.25
10	1	1	0	27.18
11	-1	0	1	35.36
12	1	0	-1	30.23
13	1	0	1	32.16
14	0	0	0	34.48
15	0	0	0	30.13
16	0	1	1	32.34
17	-1	0	-1	25.52

表4 方差分析及显著性结果

Table 4 ANOVA and significance results

变异源 Source	平方和 Sum of squares	自由度 Degree of freedom	均方 Mean square	F值 F-value	P值 P-value	显著性 Significance
模型 Model	171.19	9	19.0	64.65	<0.000 1	**
A-温度θ/℃	5.38	1	5.38	18.30	0.003 7	**
B-液固比Liquid-solid ratio/(mL·g^-1)	27.68	1	27.68	94.06	<0.000 1	**
C-时间t/h	5.02	1	5.02	17.08	0.004 4	**
AB	11.36	1	11.36	38.60	0.000 4	**
AC	2.28	1	2.28	7.75	0.027 2	*
BC	0.98	1	0.98	3.33	0.110 7	不显著Not significant
A²	13.86	1	13.86	47.09	0.000 2	**
B²	64.83	1	64.83	220.33	<0.000 1	**
C²	28.77	1	28.77	97.78	<0.000 1	**
残差 Residual	2.06	7	0.29	-	-	-
失拟项 Lack of Fit	1.11	3	0.37	1.58	0.327 0	不显著Not significant

图5 各因素交互作用的响应面图

Fig.5 Response surface plots for the interaction of factors

图6 不同质量浓度蜂胶油提取物对DPPH自由基清除率的影响

Fig.6 Effect of different concentrations of propolis oil extracts on the scavenging rate of DPPH radicals

图7 Fe2+标准曲线

Fig.7 Fe2+ standard curve

图8 蜂胶提取物的总抗氧化能力吸光度

Fig.8 Absorbance variation of total antioxidant capacity of propolis extracts

图9 高良姜素与NOS3和NOS2对接情况 A是NOS3的蛋白结构图,B、C分别表示高良姜素与NOS3结合的2D和3D图;D是NOS2的蛋白结构图,E、F分别表示高良姜素与NOS2结合的2D和3D图。

Fig.9 Docking of galangin with NOS3and NOS2 A is the protein structure of NOS3,B and C represent 2D and 3D plots of galangin binding to NOS3; D is the protein structure of NOS2, E and F represent 2D and 3D plots of galangin binding to NOS2.

参考文献 29

[1]	葛怡青, 汪浅, 仝涛. 蜂胶功能成分及生物活性研究进展[J]. 食品安全质量检测学报, 2022, 13(4): 1027-1035.
	GE Y Q, WANG Q, TONG T. Research progress on functional components and bioactivities of propolis[J]. Journal of Food Safety & Quality, 2022, 13(4): 1027-1035. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]	ZABAIOU N, FOUACHE A, TROUSSON A, et al. Biological properties of propolis extracts: something new from an ancient product[J]. Chemistry and Physics of Lipids, 2017, 207(Pt B): 214-222.
[3]	ZULHENDRI F, LESMANA R, TANDEAN S, et al. Recent update on the anti-inflammatory activities of propolis[J]. Molecules, 2022, 27(23): 8473.
[4]	GALEOTTI F, MACCARI F, FACHINI A, et al. Chemical composition and antioxidant activity of propolis prepared in different forms and in different solvents useful for finished products[J]. Foods, 2018, 7(3): 41.
[5]	PRZYBYŁEK I, KARPIŃSKI T M. Antibacterial properties of propolis[J]. Molecules, 2019, 24(11): 2047.
[6]	国家药典委员会. 中华人民共和国药典一部: 2020年版[M]. 北京: 中国医药科技出版社, 2020.
[7]	ANJUM S I, ULLAH A, KHAN K A, et al. Composition and functional properties of propolis (bee glue): a review[J]. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 2019, 26(7): 1695-1703.
[8]	ZULLKIFLEE N, TAHA H, USMAN A. Propolis: its role and efficacy in human health and diseases[J]. Molecules, 2022, 27(18): 6120.
[9]	CUI J, DUAN X Q, KE L T, et al. Extraction,purification, structural character and biological properties of propolis flavonoids: a review[J]. Fitoterapia, 2022, 157: 105106.
[10]	POBIEGA K, KRAŚNIEWSKA K, DEREWIAKA D, et al. Comparison of the antimicrobial activity of propolis extracts obtained by means of various extraction methods[J]. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 2019, 56(12): 5386-5395.
[11]	ARSLAN S, PERÇIN D, SILICI S. The in vitro effects of propolis extracts prepared with different solvents on mutans streptococci[J]. Journal of Health Science, 2010, 19: 68-73.
[12]	KUBILIENE L, LAUGALIENE V, PAVILONIS A, et al. Alternative preparation of propolis extracts: comparison of their composition and biological activities[J]. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2015, 15: 156.
[13]	JUODEIKAITE D, ŽILIUS M, BRIEDIS V. Preparation of aqueous propolis extracts applying microwave-assisted extraction[J]. Processes, 2022, 10(7): 1330.
[14]	SILICI S, BAYSA M. Antioxidant, antiradical and antipyretic effects of olive oil extract of propolis[J]. Journal of Apicultural Research, 2020, 59(5): 883-889.
[15]	CARVALHO A A, FINGER D, MACHADO C S, et al. In vivo antitumoural activity and composition of an oil extract of Brazilian propolis[J]. Food Chemistry, 2011, 126(3): 1239-1245.
[16]	FERREIRA A R, DA COSTA MACHADO M T, CHAGAS A G C M. Propolis oil extract as an alternative means to the alcoholic extract[J]. Observatório de la Economía Latinoamericana, 2023, 21(10): 15657-15676.
[17]	AKBARI S, ABDURAHMAN N H, YUNUS R M, et al. Extraction, characterization and antioxidant activity of fenugreek (Trigonella-Foenum Graecum) seed oil[J]. Materials Science for Energy Technologies, 2019, 2(2): 349-355.
[18]	REIS J S S, OLIVEIRA G B, MONTEIRO M C, et al. Antidepressant-and anxiolytic-like activities of an oil extract of propolis in rats[J]. Phytomedicine: International Journal of Phytotherapy and Phytopharmacology, 2014, 21(11): 1466-1472.
[19]	张佳淼, 李丹丹, 李杰, 等. 山楂叶总黄酮提取工艺优化及抗氧化性研究[J]. 食品工业, 2023, 44(11): 82-87.
	ZHANG J M, LI D D, LI J, et al. Optimization of extraction process and antioxidant activity of total flavonoids from hawthorn leaves[J]. The Food Industry, 2023, 44(11): 82-87. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]	HAO C, CHEN L Z, DONG H J, et al. Extraction of flavonoids from scutellariae radix using ultrasound-assisted deep eutectic solvents and evaluation of their anti-inflammatory activities[J]. ACS Omega, 2020, 5(36): 23140-23147.
[21]	LIAO J Q, GUO Z R, YU G C. Process intensification and kinetic studies of ultrasound-assisted extraction of flavonoids from peanut shells[J]. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 2021, 76: 105661.
[22]	JAFARI F, MOVAGHARNEJAD K, SADEGHI E. Infrared drying effects on the quality of eggplant slices and process optimization using response surface methodology[J]. Food Chemistry, 2020, 333: 127423.
[23]	魏磊, 王伟, 侯玥莹, 等. 葛叶总黄酮的提取工艺优化及抗菌抗氧化能力研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2021, 49(14): 152-156, 161.
	WEI L, WANG W, HOU Y Y, et al. Extraction optimization of total flavonoids from Pueraria lobate leaves and evaluations of their antibacterial and antioxidant activities[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 49(14): 152-156, 161. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24]	OUYANG X J, LI X C, LU W B, et al. A null B-ring improves the antioxidant levels of flavonol: a comparative study between galangin and 3, 5, 7-trihydroxychromone[J]. Molecules, 2018, 23(12): 3083.
[25]	JAILANI F, WILLIAMSON G. Effect of edible oils on quercetin, kaempferol and galangin transport and conjugation in the intestinal Caco-2/HT29-MTX co-culture model[J]. Food & Function, 2014, 5(4): 653-662.
[26]	NICHITOI M M, JOSCEANU A M, ISOPESCU R D, et al. Polyphenolics profile effects upon the antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of propolis extracts[J]. Scientific Reports, 2021, 11(1): 20113.
[27]	BIGNON E, RIZZA S, FILOMENI G, et al. Use of computational biochemistry for elucidating molecular mechanisms of nitric oxide synthase[J]. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, 2019, 17: 415-429.
[28]	陈柳燕, 吴传梅, 梁潘, 等. 基于斑马鱼模型和网络药理学研究四方木皮的抗炎作用及其机制[J]. 中国中药杂志, 2024(11):3070-3080.
	CHEN L Y, WU C M, LIANG P, et al. Anti-inflammatory effect and its mechanism of Saracae Cortex based onzebrafish model and network pharmacology[J]. China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica, 2024(11):3070-3080. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[29]	CURTI V, ZACCARIA V, TSETEGHO SOKENG A J, et al. Bioavailability and in vivo antioxidant activity of a standardized polyphenol mixture extracted from brown propolis[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2019, 20(5): 1250.

蜂胶油提物的制备及抗氧化活性研究

Preparation and antioxidant activity of propolis oil extracts

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 13

参考文献 29

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	周毛措, 卢建雄, 郭晓农, 冯玉兰, 柴薇薇, 高鹏飞. 基于响应面法优化藜麦秸秆发酵工艺[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(9): 2020-2030.
[2]	邵亚旭, 刘涛, 王事成, 晏磊. 秸秆-有机肥育秧基质的配比筛选与成型工艺[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(8): 1856-1866.
[3]	赵小亮, 鲁雲, 康兴兴, 龙则宇, 郑晓杰. 雁荡山铁皮石斛多糖的提取、结构表征与体外抗氧化活性[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(8): 1898-1908.
[4]	李飞, 苏甜甜, 苏康杰, 徐可, 马力, 刘子明. 螺旋藻和红球藻对斑马鱼生长性能、抗氧化酶、磷酸酶和热休克蛋白的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(7): 1511-1518.
[5]	曹乃馨, 罗阳兰, 阎勇, 解修超, 张雯龙. 桑树桑黄JM-1胞外多糖液态培养基优化及其抗氧化性研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(6): 1245-1255.
[6]	张晋, 吴晓丽, 田雨薇, 赵珂, 李欢欢, 达色, 次仁达杰, 陈黎洪, 唐宏刚. 超声波辅助酶解牦牛血粉提取氯化血红素的响应面工艺优化及品质表征[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(6): 1357-1367.
[7]	刘晨星, 曹艳, 夏其乐. 多花黄精根须皂苷的提取工艺及其抗氧化活性研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(5): 1144-1152.
[8]	宋鹏, 李理想, 江厚龙, 王茹, 李慧, 赵鹏宇, 张均, 秦平伟, 任江波, 陈庆明. 施用侧孢短芽孢杆菌对烤后烟叶钾含量及烟株生理特征的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(3): 494-502.
[9]	虎丽霞, 张婧, 高彦强, 毛尔晔, 韩康宁, 杨滟, 颉建明. 长时间镁胁迫对芹菜叶绿素荧光特性与抗氧化能力的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(2): 295-307.
[10]	张旭娟, 周历萍, 俞可欣, 柴伟国, 潘念, 傅潇霞, 施建军. 绿芦笋品种间产量及主要营养成分周年变化测定[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(10): 2238-2246.
[11]	李笑, 闫婷玉, 牛丽丽, 翟盼盼, 张华峰, 杨晓华, 彭元金. 富有机硒抹茶的化学组成、抗氧化活性及其对DNA损伤的保护作用[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(9): 2222-2232.
[12]	张赛丽, 房祥军, 吴伟杰, 高原, 陈杭君, 杨海龙, 郜海燕. 不同干燥方式对杨梅果渣粉抗氧化活性和风味的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(6): 1440-1451.
[13]	肖立涵, 辛美果, 卢文静, 叶沁, 张岑, 肖朝耿, 谌迪. 不同贮藏条件对3种花粉源蜂王浆品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(5): 1161-1167.
[14]	夏伦斌, 马龙龙, 乔德亮, 何燕飞, 蒋平. 三角帆蚌多糖对肉仔鸡生长性能、抗氧化及免疫功能的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(3): 547-555.
[15]	马波, 陶震, 周瑞, 王雪, 吕茜茜, 孙士红, 王寒, 高金秋, 张楚涵, 陈凤清. 花叶万年青功能成分提取条件优化与活性探究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(2): 383-393.