浙江农业学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (8): 1409-1415.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2021.08.08
齐振宇1(
), 蔡溧聪2, 胡卫珍1, 蔡盼2, 张龙平3, 任艳云3, 周艳虹2,*(
)
收稿日期:2021-01-21
出版日期:2021-08-25
发布日期:2021-08-27
作者简介:*周艳虹,E-mail: yanhongzhou@zju.edu.cn通讯作者:
周艳虹
基金资助:
QI Zhenyu1(
), CAI Licong2, HU Weizhen1, CAI Pan2, ZHANG Longping3, REN Yanyun3, ZHOU Yanhong2,*(
)
Received:2021-01-21
Online:2021-08-25
Published:2021-08-27
Contact:
ZHOU Yanhong
摘要:
为明确水肥一体化灌溉模式中施肥量与基追肥比例对大蒜产量与品质的影响,以山东嘉祥紫皮蒜为试验品种,在减施化肥20%条件下,设置不同的灌溉方式和基追肥比例。结果表明,大蒜水肥一体化灌溉较常规大水漫灌,每667 m2平均节水40.85 m3,节水率平均达52.50%;在不同的基肥追肥比例及灌溉方式中,水肥一体化喷灌并施用基肥60%和追肥40%处理增产效果最明显,蒜薹和蒜头产量分别提高了14.48%和10.89%,且可溶性蛋白、可溶性糖含量相比于常规大水漫灌处理分别提高了9.01%、15.75%。研究表明,通过水肥一体化模式,在合适的基追肥比例下,能够实现大蒜种植的节水、减肥和增产。
中图分类号:
齐振宇, 蔡溧聪, 胡卫珍, 蔡盼, 张龙平, 任艳云, 周艳虹. 水肥一体化模式中化肥减施与不同基追肥比例对大蒜产量和品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(8): 1409-1415.
QI Zhenyu, CAI Licong, HU Weizhen, CAI Pan, ZHANG Longping, REN Yanyun, ZHOU Yanhong. Effects of reduced application of chemical fertilizers and ratio of base and topdressing fertilizers on yield and quality of garlic in integrated mode of water and fertilizer[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(8): 1409-1415.
| 处理 Treatment | 基肥比例 Base fertilizer ratio | 追肥比例 Topdressing ratio |
|---|---|---|
| T0 | 75 | 25 |
| T1 | 75 | 25 |
| T2 | 80 | 20 |
| T3 | 60 | 40 |
| T4 | 50 | 50 |
| T5 | 40 | 60 |
表1 各处理基追肥比例设置
Table 1 Setting of the ratio of base and topdressing fertilizer for each treatment %
| 处理 Treatment | 基肥比例 Base fertilizer ratio | 追肥比例 Topdressing ratio |
|---|---|---|
| T0 | 75 | 25 |
| T1 | 75 | 25 |
| T2 | 80 | 20 |
| T3 | 60 | 40 |
| T4 | 50 | 50 |
| T5 | 40 | 60 |
| 处理 Treatment | 碱解氮 Alkali- hydrolyzable nitrogen | 有效磷 Available phosphorus | 速效钾 Available potassium |
|---|---|---|---|
| 种植前 | 73.25±2.04 a | 38.63±1.00 a | 204.74±6.79 a |
| Before planting | |||
| T0 | 66.53±1.54 bc | 29.26±3.33 c | 192.35±3.03 b |
| T1 | 59.64±1.37 d | 31.23±0.72 bc | 190.43±6.29 bc |
| T2 | 65.75±2.88 c | 31.84±1.38 bc | 187.25±4.82 cd |
| T3 | 69.34±1.02 b | 30.27±1.41 bc | 183.68±2.83 d |
| T4 | 60.22±1.99 d | 31.56±1.90 bc | 189.47±5.01 bc |
| T5 | 64.57±2.23 c | 32.14±0.61 b | 191.87±3.48 b |
表2 种植前后土壤养分状况
Table 2 Soil nutrient status before and after planting mg·kg-1
| 处理 Treatment | 碱解氮 Alkali- hydrolyzable nitrogen | 有效磷 Available phosphorus | 速效钾 Available potassium |
|---|---|---|---|
| 种植前 | 73.25±2.04 a | 38.63±1.00 a | 204.74±6.79 a |
| Before planting | |||
| T0 | 66.53±1.54 bc | 29.26±3.33 c | 192.35±3.03 b |
| T1 | 59.64±1.37 d | 31.23±0.72 bc | 190.43±6.29 bc |
| T2 | 65.75±2.88 c | 31.84±1.38 bc | 187.25±4.82 cd |
| T3 | 69.34±1.02 b | 30.27±1.41 bc | 183.68±2.83 d |
| T4 | 60.22±1.99 d | 31.56±1.90 bc | 189.47±5.01 bc |
| T5 | 64.57±2.23 c | 32.14±0.61 b | 191.87±3.48 b |
| 处理 Treatment | 株高 Height/ cm | 假茎粗 Stem thickness/cm | 叶面积 Leaf area/ cm2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| T0 | 88.66±3.86 ab | 1.45±0.07 ab | 371.53±24.50 ab |
| T1 | 82.45±2.43 c | 1.38±0.08 b | 248.17±42.06 b |
| T2 | 89.43±0.74 ab | 1.45±0.05 ab | 393.47±65.60 a |
| T3 | 93.07±4.58 a | 1.60±0.10 a | 403.80±52.65 a |
| T4 | 89.10±0.62 b | 1.47±0.13 ab | 286.88±31.51 b |
| T5 | 85.87±2.45 bc | 1.47±0.14 ab | 249.78±27.34 b |
表3 不同处理对大蒜形态指标的影响
Table 3 Influence of different treatments on morphological indexes of garlic
| 处理 Treatment | 株高 Height/ cm | 假茎粗 Stem thickness/cm | 叶面积 Leaf area/ cm2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| T0 | 88.66±3.86 ab | 1.45±0.07 ab | 371.53±24.50 ab |
| T1 | 82.45±2.43 c | 1.38±0.08 b | 248.17±42.06 b |
| T2 | 89.43±0.74 ab | 1.45±0.05 ab | 393.47±65.60 a |
| T3 | 93.07±4.58 a | 1.60±0.10 a | 403.80±52.65 a |
| T4 | 89.10±0.62 b | 1.47±0.13 ab | 286.88±31.51 b |
| T5 | 85.87±2.45 bc | 1.47±0.14 ab | 249.78±27.34 b |
| 处理 Treatment | 抽薹率 Bolting rate/% | 薹茎长 Stalk length/cm | 单薹质量 Single garlic sprouts weight/g | 鳞茎横径 Garlic diameter/cm | 蒜头单头质量 Single garlic weight/g |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T0 | 65.32±1.30 ab | 46.77±1.49 ab | 8.46±0.33 c | 4.86±0.16 b | 48.80±1.52 bc |
| T1 | 64.70±5.70 ab | 46.30±1.34 bc | 8.57±0.44 c | 4.50±0.24 b | 48.51±2.41 bc |
| T2 | 65.60±4.14 ab | 47.20±0.79 b | 9.03±0.30 b | 5.03±0.10 ab | 55.09±4.66 a |
| T3 | 70.57±1.19 a | 48.95±0.58 a | 9.56±0.16 a | 5.31±0.39 a | 59.63±2.08 a |
| T4 | 60.69±1.69 b | 45.64±0.82 c | 9.07±0.16 b | 4.86±0.35 ab | 49.12±1.49 b |
| T5 | 61.41±1.68 b | 46.91±0.50 bc | 8.51±0.27 c | 4.75±0.26 ab | 44.13±3.36 c |
表4 不同处理对大蒜蒜薹和鳞茎生长的影响
Table 4 Effects of different treatments on growth of garlic sprouts and bulbs
| 处理 Treatment | 抽薹率 Bolting rate/% | 薹茎长 Stalk length/cm | 单薹质量 Single garlic sprouts weight/g | 鳞茎横径 Garlic diameter/cm | 蒜头单头质量 Single garlic weight/g |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T0 | 65.32±1.30 ab | 46.77±1.49 ab | 8.46±0.33 c | 4.86±0.16 b | 48.80±1.52 bc |
| T1 | 64.70±5.70 ab | 46.30±1.34 bc | 8.57±0.44 c | 4.50±0.24 b | 48.51±2.41 bc |
| T2 | 65.60±4.14 ab | 47.20±0.79 b | 9.03±0.30 b | 5.03±0.10 ab | 55.09±4.66 a |
| T3 | 70.57±1.19 a | 48.95±0.58 a | 9.56±0.16 a | 5.31±0.39 a | 59.63±2.08 a |
| T4 | 60.69±1.69 b | 45.64±0.82 c | 9.07±0.16 b | 4.86±0.35 ab | 49.12±1.49 b |
| T5 | 61.41±1.68 b | 46.91±0.50 bc | 8.51±0.27 c | 4.75±0.26 ab | 44.13±3.36 c |
| 处理 Treatment | 大蒜素含量 Allicin content | 可溶性蛋白含量 Soluble protein content | 可溶性糖含量 Soluble sugar content |
|---|---|---|---|
| T0 | 1.01±0.17 ab | 19.42±0.63 cd | 25.90±1.67 bc |
| T1 | 1.07±0.99 a | 18.90±0.23 d | 23.68±3.83 bc |
| T2 | 1.00±0.09 ab | 20.58±0.39 b | 27.04±3.66 ab |
| T3 | 0.93±0.08 ab | 21.17±0.31 a | 29.98±2.84 a |
| T4 | 0.89±0.02 b | 19.08±0.15 cd | 22.46±0.14 c |
| T5 | 0.86±0.03 b | 19.74±0.31 c | 22.65±2.26 c |
表5 不同处理对大蒜营养品质的影响
Table 5 Effects of different treatments on nutritional quality of garlic mg·g-1
| 处理 Treatment | 大蒜素含量 Allicin content | 可溶性蛋白含量 Soluble protein content | 可溶性糖含量 Soluble sugar content |
|---|---|---|---|
| T0 | 1.01±0.17 ab | 19.42±0.63 cd | 25.90±1.67 bc |
| T1 | 1.07±0.99 a | 18.90±0.23 d | 23.68±3.83 bc |
| T2 | 1.00±0.09 ab | 20.58±0.39 b | 27.04±3.66 ab |
| T3 | 0.93±0.08 ab | 21.17±0.31 a | 29.98±2.84 a |
| T4 | 0.89±0.02 b | 19.08±0.15 cd | 22.46±0.14 c |
| T5 | 0.86±0.03 b | 19.74±0.31 c | 22.65±2.26 c |
| 处理 Treatment | 灌水量 Irrigation volume/(m3· 667 m-2) | 节水量 Water saving volume/ (m3·667 m-2) | 节水率 Water saving ratio/% |
|---|---|---|---|
| T0 | 77.51 | — | — |
| T1 | 74.35 | 3.16 | 4 |
| T2 | 37.27 | 40.24 | 52 |
| T3 | 36.92 | 40.59 | 52 |
| T4 | 37.65 | 39.86 | 51 |
| T5 | 34.80 | 42.71 | 55 |
表6 不同灌水和施肥处理的灌水量比较
Table 6 Comparison of irrigation amount of different irrigation and fertilization treatments
| 处理 Treatment | 灌水量 Irrigation volume/(m3· 667 m-2) | 节水量 Water saving volume/ (m3·667 m-2) | 节水率 Water saving ratio/% |
|---|---|---|---|
| T0 | 77.51 | — | — |
| T1 | 74.35 | 3.16 | 4 |
| T2 | 37.27 | 40.24 | 52 |
| T3 | 36.92 | 40.59 | 52 |
| T4 | 37.65 | 39.86 | 51 |
| T5 | 34.80 | 42.71 | 55 |
| 收获部位 Harvest tissue | 处理 Treatment | 产量 Yield/(kg· 667 m-2) | 增产率 Increased production rate/% | 施肥量 Fertilizer amount/ (kg·667 m-2) | 灌水量 Irrigation volume/ (m3·667 m-2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 蒜薹Garlic sprout | T0 | 121.73±5.14 bc | — | 363.56 | 77.51 |
| T1 | 115.04±8.91 bc | -5.50 | 290.85 | 74.35 | |
| T2 | 127.02±10.38 b | 4.35 | 290.85 | 37.27 | |
| T3 | 139.36±3.90 a | 14.48 | 290.85 | 36.92 | |
| T4 | 123.79±9.99 bc | 1.69 | 290.85 | 37.65 | |
| T5 | 112.14±5.11 c | -7.88 | 290.85 | 34.80 | |
| 蒜头Garlic | T0 | 1738.54±33.48 cd | — | 363.56 | 77.51 |
| T1 | 1696.70±30.06 d | -2.41 | 290.85 | 74.35 | |
| T2 | 1795.79±37.43 c | 3.29 | 290.85 | 37.27 | |
| T3 | 1927.91±34.81 a | 10.89 | 290.85 | 36.92 | |
| T4 | 1867.25±26.92 b | 7.40 | 290.85 | 37.65 | |
| T5 | 1820.06±26.69 c | -4.69 | 290.85 | 34.80 |
表7 不同灌水和施肥处理对大蒜蒜薹和蒜头产量的影响
Table 7 Effects of different irrigation and fertilization treatments on garlic sprout and garilc yield
| 收获部位 Harvest tissue | 处理 Treatment | 产量 Yield/(kg· 667 m-2) | 增产率 Increased production rate/% | 施肥量 Fertilizer amount/ (kg·667 m-2) | 灌水量 Irrigation volume/ (m3·667 m-2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 蒜薹Garlic sprout | T0 | 121.73±5.14 bc | — | 363.56 | 77.51 |
| T1 | 115.04±8.91 bc | -5.50 | 290.85 | 74.35 | |
| T2 | 127.02±10.38 b | 4.35 | 290.85 | 37.27 | |
| T3 | 139.36±3.90 a | 14.48 | 290.85 | 36.92 | |
| T4 | 123.79±9.99 bc | 1.69 | 290.85 | 37.65 | |
| T5 | 112.14±5.11 c | -7.88 | 290.85 | 34.80 | |
| 蒜头Garlic | T0 | 1738.54±33.48 cd | — | 363.56 | 77.51 |
| T1 | 1696.70±30.06 d | -2.41 | 290.85 | 74.35 | |
| T2 | 1795.79±37.43 c | 3.29 | 290.85 | 37.27 | |
| T3 | 1927.91±34.81 a | 10.89 | 290.85 | 36.92 | |
| T4 | 1867.25±26.92 b | 7.40 | 290.85 | 37.65 | |
| T5 | 1820.06±26.69 c | -4.69 | 290.85 | 34.80 |
| 处理 Treatment | 水费 Water | 农药 Pesticide | 化肥 Fertilizer | 人工 Labor | 材料 Material | 总计 Sum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T0 | 42.63 | 129.78 | 457.19 | 3 460 | 53 | 4 142.60 |
| T1 | 40.89 | 129.78 | 365.75 | 3 550 | 58 | 4 144.42 |
| T2 | 20.50 | 77.64 | 365.75 | 3 680 | 247 | 4 390.89 |
| T3 | 20.31 | 70.29 | 365.75 | 3 720 | 251 | 4 427.35 |
| T4 | 20.71 | 76.41 | 365.75 | 3 620 | 253 | 4 335.87 |
| T5 | 19.14 | 72.85 | 365.75 | 3 670 | 260 | 4 387.74 |
表8 各处理每667 m2投入成本
Table 8 Input cost per 667 m2 for each treatment 元Yuan
| 处理 Treatment | 水费 Water | 农药 Pesticide | 化肥 Fertilizer | 人工 Labor | 材料 Material | 总计 Sum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T0 | 42.63 | 129.78 | 457.19 | 3 460 | 53 | 4 142.60 |
| T1 | 40.89 | 129.78 | 365.75 | 3 550 | 58 | 4 144.42 |
| T2 | 20.50 | 77.64 | 365.75 | 3 680 | 247 | 4 390.89 |
| T3 | 20.31 | 70.29 | 365.75 | 3 720 | 251 | 4 427.35 |
| T4 | 20.71 | 76.41 | 365.75 | 3 620 | 253 | 4 335.87 |
| T5 | 19.14 | 72.85 | 365.75 | 3 670 | 260 | 4 387.74 |
| 处理 Treatment | 蒜薹产量 Garlic sprouts yield/ (kg·667 m-2) | 蒜薹单价 Garlic sprouts price/Yuan | 蒜头产量 Garlic yield/ (kg·667m-2) | 蒜头单价/元 Garlic price/Yuan | 产出/元 Output/ Yuan | 成本/元 Input/ Yuan | 收益/元 Profit/ Yuan |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T0 | 121.73 | 3.00 | 1 738.54 | 4.00 | 7 319.35 | 4 142.6 | 3 176.75 |
| T1 | 115.04 | 3.00 | 1 696.70 | 4.00 | 7 131.92 | 4 144.42 | 2 987.50 |
| T2 | 127.02 | 3.00 | 1 795.79 | 4.00 | 7 564.22 | 4 390.89 | 3 173.33 |
| T3 | 139.36 | 3.00 | 1 927.91 | 4.00 | 8 129.72 | 4 427.35 | 3 702.37 |
| T4 | 123.79 | 3.00 | 1 867.25 | 4.00 | 7 840.37 | 4 335.87 | 3 504.50 |
| T5 | 112.14 | 3.00 | 1 820.06 | 4.00 | 7 616.66 | 4 387.74 | 3 228.92 |
表9 各处理每667 m2收益与投产比
Table 9 Income per 667 m2 of each treatment and the ratio of production
| 处理 Treatment | 蒜薹产量 Garlic sprouts yield/ (kg·667 m-2) | 蒜薹单价 Garlic sprouts price/Yuan | 蒜头产量 Garlic yield/ (kg·667m-2) | 蒜头单价/元 Garlic price/Yuan | 产出/元 Output/ Yuan | 成本/元 Input/ Yuan | 收益/元 Profit/ Yuan |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T0 | 121.73 | 3.00 | 1 738.54 | 4.00 | 7 319.35 | 4 142.6 | 3 176.75 |
| T1 | 115.04 | 3.00 | 1 696.70 | 4.00 | 7 131.92 | 4 144.42 | 2 987.50 |
| T2 | 127.02 | 3.00 | 1 795.79 | 4.00 | 7 564.22 | 4 390.89 | 3 173.33 |
| T3 | 139.36 | 3.00 | 1 927.91 | 4.00 | 8 129.72 | 4 427.35 | 3 702.37 |
| T4 | 123.79 | 3.00 | 1 867.25 | 4.00 | 7 840.37 | 4 335.87 | 3 504.50 |
| T5 | 112.14 | 3.00 | 1 820.06 | 4.00 | 7 616.66 | 4 387.74 | 3 228.92 |
| [1] | 胡世平, 冷德良, 肖建强, 等. 大蒜科学施肥及注意事项[J]. 长江蔬菜, 2019(17):70-72. |
| HU S P, LENG D L, XIAO J Q, et al. Scientific fertilization methods and points for attention of garlic[J]. Journal of Changjiang Vegetables, 2019(17):70-72.(in Chinese) | |
| [2] | 孙景生, 康绍忠. 我国水资源利用现状与节水灌溉发展对策[J]. 农业工程学报, 2000, 16(2):1-5. |
| SUN J S, KANG S Z. Present situation of water resources usage and developing countermeasures of water-saving irrigation in China[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2000, 16(2):1-5.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [3] | 李传哲, 许仙菊, 马洪波, 等. 水肥一体化技术提高水肥利用效率研究进展[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2017, 33(2):469-475. |
| LI C Z, XU X J, MA H B, et al. Research advances in fertigation technology improving water and fertilizer use efficiency[J]. Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 33(2):469-475.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [4] | 高祥照, 杜森, 钟永红, 等. 水肥一体化发展现状与展望[J]. 中国农业信息, 2015(4):14-19. |
| GAO X Z, DU S, ZHONG Y H, et al. Current status and prospects of integrated water and fertilizer development[J]. China Agriculture Information, 2015(4):14-19.(in Chinese) | |
| [5] | 马富裕, 刘扬, 崔静, 等. 水肥一体化研究进展[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2019, 56(1):183-192. |
| MA F Y, LIU Y, CUI J, et al. Review on the research progress of water and fertilizer integration[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 56(1):183-192.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [6] | 沈宝云, 康小华, 张宗雄, 等. 滴灌条件下不同基追肥比例对马铃薯生长发育、产量及经济效益的影响[J]. 中国马铃薯, 2018, 32(5):283-292. |
| SHEN B Y, KANG X H, ZHANG Z X, et al. Effects of ratio of base fertilizer to topdressing on growth, development, yield and economic benefit of potato under drip irrigation[J]. Chinese Potato Journal, 2018, 32(5):283-292.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [7] | 张敏. 水肥一体化滴灌技术在设施蔬菜中的应用[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2017(12):337-338. |
| ZHANG M. Application of water and fertilizer integrated drip irrigation technology in protected vegetables[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2017(12):337-338. (in Chinese) | |
| [8] | 赵文戈, 肖世盛. 露地红辣椒减肥减药栽培技术[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2020(11):111-112. |
| ZHAO W G, XIAO S S. Cultivation techniques for weight loss and drug reduction of red pepper in open field[J]. China Vegetables, 2020(11):111-112.(in Chinese) | |
| [9] | 桑卫民, 刘丽. 山东设施番茄有机替代-水肥一体化增效减肥技术模式[J]. 农业知识, 2020(18):13-14. |
| SANG W M, LIU L. Shandong facility tomato organic substitution-water and fertilizer integration synergistic weight loss technology model[J]. Agricultural Knowledge, 2020(18):13-14.(in Chinese) | |
| [10] | 崔艳秋, 王乃建, 苏遵鹏, 等. 金乡大蒜氮磷钾营养吸收特点与合理施肥研究[J]. 山东农业科学, 2015, 47(2):72-74. |
| CUI Y Q, WANG N J, SU Z P, et al. Research on absorption characteristics of nitrogen, potassium and phosphorus and relational fertilization of Jinxiang garlic[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 47(2):72-74.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [11] | 王乃建, 邱金华, 朱庆涛. 大蒜养分需求规律及施肥模型初探[J]. 吉林蔬菜, 2014(9):36-37. |
| WANG N J, QIU J H, ZHU Q T. The research of garlic’s nutrient requirements and fertilization model[J]. Jilin Vegetables, 2014(9):36-37.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [12] | 王乃建, 张树文, 王忠旭. 大蒜施肥模型研究[J]. 现代农业科技, 2014(17):94-95. |
| WANG N J, ZHANG S W, WANG Z X. Research on garlic fertilization model[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2014(17):94-95.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [13] | 李合生. 植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2000. |
| [14] | 屈姝存, 周朴华. 大蒜油提取及大蒜油与大蒜渣的化学成分分析[J]. 湖南农业大学学报, 1998, 24(3):67-69. |
| QU S C, ZHOU P H. The extraction of diallyl thiosulfonate and the analyses of chemical composition of garlic oil and the residue[J]. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University, 1998, 24(3):67-69.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [15] | 王春夏. 大蒜膜下水肥一体化栽培效益探究[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2017(2):36-38. |
| WANG C X. Exploration on the benefits of integrated water and fertilizer cultivation of garlic under plastic film[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2017(2):36-38.(in Chinese) | |
| [16] | 周红梅, 李艳霞, 王春兰, 等. 济宁地区覆膜大蒜化肥减施增效技术措施研究[J]. 现代农业科技, 2019(6):61-63. |
| ZHOU H M, LI Y X, WANG C L, et al. Study on fertilizer reduction and efficiency increase of garlic covered with mulch in Jining region[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019(6):61-63.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [17] | 王飞, 吴方华, 姚明华, 等. 水肥一体化技术在大蒜上的试验研究[J]. 辣椒杂志, 2017, 15(1):28-29. |
| WANG F, WU F H, YAO M H, et al. Experimental study on the application of water and fertilizer integration technology on garlic[J]. Journal of China Capsicum, 2017, 15(1):28-29.(in Chinese) |
| [1] | 许卫猛, 徐妍, 陈国立. 基于多种分析方法的糯玉米品质综合评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(9): 1840-1848. |
| [2] | 吴菊, 杨飞, 吴国泉, 傅贤, 徐晨光. 砂培和土壤栽培对黄瓜生长、产量与品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(9): 1905-1913. |
| [3] | 朱为静, 吴佳, 洪春来, 朱凤香, 洪磊东, 张涛, 张硕, 诸惠芬. 秸秆覆盖对土壤水热肥及蟠桃产量和品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(9): 1924-1932. |
| [4] | 贺世雄, 杨蕾, 齐安民, 程籍, 王敏, 李英奎, 洪林. 中间砧对3种杂柑叶片光合特性、理化指标和果实品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(8): 1680-1693. |
| [5] | 张顺昌, 徐继根, 符成悦, 蒲占湑, 胡丽鹏, 吴昊, 李俊兵, 辛亮, 雷元军. 喷施氨基酸钙对红美人杂柑果皮龟裂与品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(8): 1706-1715. |
| [6] | 张智颖, 邱琴, 侯立娟, 徐平, 蒋宁, 林金盛, 李辉平, 曲绍轩, 马林, 王伟霞, 李福后. 杀虫剂施用对秀珍菇和毛木耳的安全性评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(8): 1733-1742. |
| [7] | 严福林, 郎云虎, 简应权, 陈雄飞, 魏巍, 王志威, 安江勇, 任得强, 丁宁, 魏升华. 八爪金龙药材产量与品质对土壤理化性状的响应[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(8): 1766-1775. |
| [8] | 王呈阳, 刘洁雅, 吴敏怡, 谢博伊, 洪德成, 冷锋, 吴国泉. 钙处理对涝害下寒香蜜葡萄果实品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(7): 1451-1458. |
| [9] | 张若楠, 门小明, 秦凯鹏, 王彬彬, 吴杰, 丁向彬, 徐子伟, 齐珂珂. 绿嘉黑猪的不同杂交组合生长性能、胴体品质、产肉性能和收益比较研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(6): 1203-1211. |
| [10] | 项缨, 丛建民, 潘丹红, 陶永刚. 春大棚有机种植不同品种番茄的生育进程分析和综合评价研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(6): 1252-1261. |
| [11] | 刘文琦, 胡齐赞, 岳智臣, 陶鹏, 雷娟利, 李必元, 赵彦婷, 王华森. 夏季高温对叶用芥菜外观与营养品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(6): 1262-1271. |
| [12] | 张智, 何豪豪, 郁妙, 许剑锋. 化肥减量配施土壤改良剂对土壤酸度、土壤养分和水稻产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(6): 1301-1308. |
| [13] | 林小兵, 黎江, 成艳红, 王斌强, 何绍浪, 黄尚书, 黄欠如. 不同有机物料对土壤微生物生物量、矿质氮含量与水稻产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(6): 1309-1318. |
| [14] | 张程程, 范涛, 章检明, 赵风亮, 忻晓庭, 牛海月, 刘大群. 缙云梅干菜腌制过程中细菌群落与品质的变化[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(6): 1336-1343. |
| [15] | 岳丽, 庄红梅, 祖力皮牙·买买提, 王佳敏, 毛红艳, 张英仙, 尼格尔热依·亚迪卡尔, 于明. 基于主成分分析与聚类分析的芜菁肉质根质地品质综合评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(5): 1057-1071. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||