基于CFD-DEM的排肥用波纹管结构优化设计与试验

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2023.01.21

浙江农业学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (1): 191-201.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2023.01.21

基于CFD-DEM的排肥用波纹管结构优化设计与试验

张一帆(), 何瑞银(), 段庆飞, 徐勇

南京农业大学工学院,江苏南京210031

收稿日期:2021-09-24 出版日期:2023-01-25 发布日期:2023-02-21
作者简介:张一帆(1996—),男,江苏南京人,硕士研究生,主要从事农机现代设计理论及方法研究。E-mail:njauzhangyifan@163.com
通讯作者: *何瑞银,E-mail:ryhe_njau@163.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(2016YFD0300908);国家重点研发计划(2012)

Numerical analysis of flow characteristics and structural optimization of bellows based on CFD-DEM

ZHANG Yifan(), HE Ruiyin(), DUAN Qingfei, XU Yong

College of Engineering, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210031, China

Received:2021-09-24 Online:2023-01-25 Published:2023-02-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为探究波纹管结构参数与输送均匀性的关系,获得最优参数组合以提高气力排肥均匀性。本文基于CFD-DEM耦合仿真技术构建了以排肥均匀性变异系数为响应值的二次响应面模型,在单因素试验的基础上采用BDD法研究了波纹管幅宽、波纹间距和波长之间交互作用对排肥均匀性的影响,并获得了波纹管的最佳参数组合,最后进行台架试验对仿真模型与优化结果进行验证。仿真试验结果表明,排肥均匀性变异系数随波长、幅宽、波纹间距的增加先减小后增加,波纹管结构参数对排肥均匀性的影响显著性顺序为幅宽>波长>波纹间距。波纹管最优结构参数为波长18.103 mm,波纹间距12.158 mm,幅宽8.863 mm,此时排肥均匀性变异系数为7.5%。单因素台架试验中尿素颗粒仿真预测值与台架实际值变化趋势一致,数值基本重合,最优参数组合波纹管排肥均匀性变异系数与仿真试验预测值相对误差的均值为5.84%,说明仿真模型精确可靠。复合肥颗粒变化趋势与尿素颗粒基本一致,说明仿真模型具有普适性。本研究可为波纹管的使用与优化提供参考。

关键词: 波纹管, 响应面, 仿真试验, 结构优化, 排肥均匀性

Abstract:

In order to explore the relationship between bellows structural parameters and conveying uniformity, the optimal parameter combination was obtained to improve the uniformity of pneumatic fertilizer discharge. Based on CFD-DEM coupling simulation technology, this paper constructed a quadratic response surface model with the variation coefficient of fertilizer discharge uniformity as the response value. On the basis of single factor test, BDD method was used to study the influence of the interaction between bellows width, bellows spacing and wavelength on fertilizer discharge uniformity, and the best parameter combination of bellows was obtained, Finally, the bench test was carried out to verify the simulation model and optimization results. The simulation results showed that the variation coefficient of fertilizer discharge uniformity firstly decreased and then increased with the increase of wavelength, width and ripple spacing. The order of significance of the influence of bellows structural parameters on fertilizer discharge uniformity was width>wavelength>ripple spacing. The optimal structural parameters of bellows were wavelength 18.103 mm, ripple spacing 12.158 mm and width 8.863 mm. At this time, the variation coefficient of fertilizer discharge uniformity was 7.5%. In the single factor bench test, the change trend of urea particle simulation predicted value was consistent with the actual value of the bench, and the values basically coincided. The average value of the relative error between the variation coefficient of corrugated pipe fertilizer discharge uniformity of the optimal parameter combination and the predicted value of the simulation test was 5.84%, which showed that the simulation model was accurate and reliable. The change trend of compound fertilizer particles was basically consistent with that of urea particles, which showed that the simulation model was universal. This study can provide a reference for the use and optimization of bellows.

Key words: corrugated pipe, response surface, simulation test, structural optimization, fertilizer uniformity

中图分类号:

S220.3

张一帆, 何瑞银, 段庆飞, 徐勇. 基于CFD-DEM的排肥用波纹管结构优化设计与试验[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(1): 191-201.

ZHANG Yifan, HE Ruiyin, DUAN Qingfei, XU Yong. Numerical analysis of flow characteristics and structural optimization of bellows based on CFD-DEM[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(1): 191-201.

图/表 16

图1 波纹管结构示意图 a,波纹管几何结构图;b,三维建模效果图。

Fig.1 Structural diagram of bellows a, Bellows geometric structure diagram; b, 3D modeling rendering.

图2 网格划分结果示意图

Fig.2 Schematic diagram of meshing results

图3 划分网格箱体并对各个箱体内颗粒累加计数

Fig.3 Dividing grid box and accumulating counting the number of particles in each box

表1 单因素试验因素水平表

Table 1 Single factor test factor level table mm

水平 Level	因素Factor
水平 Level	波长 Wavelength	波纹间距 Ripple spacing	幅宽 Width of cloth
1	0	0	2
2	5	5	4
3	10	10	6
4	15	15	8
5	20	20	10

图4 不同幅宽下排肥均匀性变异系数变化

Fig.4 Variation coefficient of fertilizer uniformity under different width of cloth

图5 不同波长下排肥均匀性变异系数变化

Fig.5 Variation coefficient of fertilizer uniformity under different wavelengths

图6 不同波纹间距下排肥均匀性变异系数变化

Fig.6 Variation coefficient of fertilizer uniformity under different ripple spacing

表2 BDD法实验组因素编码及水平

Table 2 Factors and levels of experiment based on BDD method

编码 Code	影响因素 Influence factor	水平Level
编码 Code	影响因素 Influence factor	-1	0	+1
A	幅宽Width of cloth/mm	6	8	10
B	波纹间距Ripple spacing/mm	0	10	20
C	波长Wavelength/mm	10	15	20

表3 实验组BDD法响应面试验设计与结果

Table 3 Orthogonal test table based on BDD method

序号 Serial number	编码 Code			变异系数 Coefficient of variation/%
序号 Serial number	A	B	C	变异系数 Coefficient of variation/%
1	0	0	0	7.65
2	1	-1	0	11.60
3	0	0	0	8.84
4	1	0	-1	15.30
5	1	0	1	8.70
6	1	1	0	9.76
7	-1	-1	0	11.45
8	-1	0	-1	15.24
9	0	0	0	8.61
10	-1	1	0	15.5
11	0	0	0	7.45
12	0	-1	1	12.54
13	0	1	1	11.50
14	0	0	0	8.43
15	0	1	-1	17.89
16	0	-1	-1	11.61
17	-1	0	1	15.45

图7 BDD法残差分析 a,内学生化残差正态分布概率;b,外学生化残差与预测值;c,预测值与实际值。

Fig.7 Residual analysis of BDD method a, Normal distribution probability of internal biochemical residuals; b, Residual error and predictive value of external biochemistry; c, Predicted values and actual values.

表4 方差分析结果

Table 4 Analysis of variance results

方差来源 Variance source	平方和 Sum of squares	自由度 Freedom	均方差 Mean variance	F值 F value	P值 P value	显著性 Significance
模型Model	165.77	9	18.42	44.42	<0.000 1	极显著Significant
A	18.85	1	18.85	45.46	0.000 3
B	6.94	1	6.94	16.73	0.004 6
C	17.55	1	17.55	42.33	0.000 3
AB	8.67	1	8.67	20.92	0.002 6
AC	11.59	1	11.59	27.96	0.001 1
BC	13.40	1	13.40	32.31	0.000 7
A²	18.30	1	18.30	44.12	0.000 3
B²	13.60	1	13.60	32.79	0.000 7
C²	48.44	1	48.44	116.84	<0.000 1
残差Residual	2.90	7	0.41
失拟项Lack of fit	1.41	3	0.47	1.25	0.401 7	不显著
纯误差	1.50	4	0.37			Not significant
总和	168.67	16

图8 BDD法响应面分析结果 a,波长与波纹间距对变异系数的交互作用;b,波纹间距与幅宽对变异系数的交互作用; c.波长与幅宽对变异系数的交互作用。

Fig.8 response surface analysis results of BDD method a, Interaction between wavelength and ripple spacing on coefficient of variation; b, Interaction between ripple spacing and width of cloth on coefficient of variation; c, Interaction of wavelength and width of cloth on coefficient of variation.

图9 气力式排肥试验台 1,排肥管;2,分配器;3,波纹管;4,弯管;5,供料喷射器;6,排肥控制盒;7,风机调速器;8,排肥电机;9,风机;10,排肥器;11,肥箱。

Fig.9 Pneumatic fertilizer discharge test bench 1, Fertilizer discharge pipe; 2, Distributor; 3, Bellows; 4, Elbow; 5, Jet feeder; 6, Fertilizer discharge control box; 7, Fan governor; 8, Fertilizer discharge motor; 9, Fan; 10, Fertilizer discharge device; 11, Fertilizer box.

图10 尿素颗粒仿真值与实际值对照 a, 不同幅宽仿真值与实际值对照;b,不同波长仿真值与实际值对照;c,不同波纹间距仿真值与实际值对照。

Fig.10 Comparison between simulated value and actual value of urea granules a, Comparison between simulation values and actual values of different widths; b, Comparison between simulated values and actual values of different wavelengths; c, Comparison between simulation value and actual value of different ripple spacing.

图11 尿素颗粒与复合肥颗粒台架试验结果对照 a,不同幅宽尿素与复合肥对照;b,不同波长尿素与复合肥对照;c,不同波纹间距尿素与复合肥对照。

Fig.11 Comparison of bench test results of urea granules and compound fertilizer granules a, Comparison of urea and compound fertilizer with different widths; b, Comparison of urea and compound fertilizer with different wavelengths; c, Comparison of urea and compound fertilizer with different ripple spacing.

表5 最优参数台架试验结果

Table 5 Bench experiment results %

试验编号 Test number	排肥均匀性变异系数 Coefficient of variation of fertilizer uniformity	仿真试验预测值 Simulation estimate	相对误差 Relative error	相对误差均值 Relative error mean
1	7.89	7.5	5.2	5.84
2	7.68		2.4
3	7.74		3.2
4	8.22		9.6
5	8.16		8.8

参考文献 27

[1]	朱兆良, 金继运. 保障我国粮食安全的肥料问题[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013, 19(2): 259-273.
	ZHU Z L, JIN J Y. Fertilizer use and food security in China[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2013, 19(2): 259-273. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]	马鹏, 杨志远, 李娜, 等. 油菜-水稻轮作模式下油菜季氮肥投入与水稻季氮肥运筹对杂交籼稻光合生产力及产量的影响[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2020, 41(3): 23-30.
	MA P, YANG Z Y, LI N, et al. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer application in rape season and nitrogen fertilizer management in rice season on photosynthetic productvity and yield of hybrid japonica rice under rape-rice rotation mode[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2020, 41(3): 23-30. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]	王宇峰, 孟会生, 李廷亮, 等. 培肥措施对复垦土壤微生物碳氮代谢功能多样性的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(24): 81-90.
	WANG Y F, MENG H S, LI T L, et al. Effects of fertilization regime on the functional diversity of microbial carbon and nitrogen metabolism in reclaimed soil[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2020, 36(24): 81-90. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]	曾靖, 常春华, 王雅鹏. 基于粮食安全的我国化肥投入研究[J]. 农业经济问题, 2010, 31(5): 66-70,111.
	ZENG J, CHANG C H, WANG Y P. Study on the fertilizer inputs based on China s food security[J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2010, 31(5): 66-70,111. (in Chinese)
[5]	向涛, 綦勇. 粮食安全与农业面源污染: 以农地禀赋对化肥投入强度的影响为例[J]. 财经研究, 2015, 41(7): 132-144.
	XIANG T, QI Y. Food security and agricultural non-point source pollution: taking the impact of agricultural land endowments on fertilizer use intensity as an example[J]. Journal of Finance and Economics, 2015, 41(7): 132-144. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]	王朝辉. 我国小麦施肥问题与化肥减施[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(23): 4813-4815.
	WANG Z H. Problems in fertilization and fertilizer reduction in wheat production of China[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(23): 4813-4815. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]	林挺锐, 孙郑, 卢日辉, 等. 新型植物源有机药肥对水稻的肥效及防虫效果[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2021, 42(2): 58-64.
	LIN T R, SUN Z, LU R H, et al. Effects of new organic fertilizers with botanical pesticide components on rice growth and insecticidal efficiency[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2021, 42(2): 58-64. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	施印炎, 陈满, 汪小旵, 等. 稻麦精准追肥机执行机构的设计与试验[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2015, 36(6): 119-124.
	SHI Y Y, CHEN M, WANG X C, et al. Design and experiment of precision fertilizer applicator actuator of rice and wheat[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2015, 36(6): 119-124. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	杨盼盼, 蒋慧敏, 蒲强, 等. 与化肥配施的菌肥用量对土壤肥力特性的影响[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2017, 38(3): 26-31.
	YANG P P, JIANG H M, PU Q, et al. Effects of application dosages of bacterial manure with chemical fertilizer on soil fertility[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2017, 38(3): 26-31. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]	何亚凯, 杨学军, 翟长远, 等. 集排风送式玉米分层追肥机设计与试验[J]. 农业机械学报, 2020, 51(11): 54-63.
	HE Y K, YANG X J, ZHAI C Y, et al. Design and experiment of air-assisted layered fertilization machine of centralized distributing for corn[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2020, 51(11): 54-63. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]	左兴健, 武广伟, 付卫强, 等. 风送式水稻侧深精准施肥装置的设计与试验[J]. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(3): 14-21.
	ZUO X J, WU G W, FU W Q, et al. Design and experiment on air-blast rice side deep precision fertilization device[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2016, 32(3): 14-21. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]	杨庆璐, 李子涵, 李洪文, 等. 基于CFD-DEM的集排式分肥装置颗粒运动数值分析[J]. 农业机械学报, 2019, 50(8): 81-89.
	YANG Q L, LI Z H, LI H W, et al. Numerical analysis of particle motion in pneumatic centralized fertilizer distribution device based on CFD-DEM[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2019, 50(8): 81-89. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]	张晓辉, 王永振, 仉利, 等. 小麦气力集排器排种分配系统设计与试验[J]. 农业机械学报, 2018, 49(3): 59-67.
	ZHANG X H, WANG Y Z, ZHANG L, et al. Design and experiment of wheat pneumatic centralized seeding distributing system[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2018, 49(3): 59-67. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]	戴亿政, 罗锡文, 王在满, 等. 气力集排式水稻分种器设计与试验[J]. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(24): 36-42.
	DAI Y Z, LUO X W, WANG Z M, et al. Design and experiment of rice pneumatic centralized seed distributor[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2016, 32(24): 36-42. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]	李中华, 王德成, 刘贵林, 等. 气流分配式排种器CFD模拟与改进[J]. 农业机械学报, 2009, 40(3): 64-68.
	LI Z H, WANG D C, LIU G L, et al. CFD simulation and improvement of air-stream distributive metering device[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2009, 40(3): 64-68. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]	常金丽. 机械定量气流式集中排种系统的研究及其排种特性试验分析[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2007.
	CHANG J L. Research and experimental analysis of centralized pneumatic seeding system[D]. Tai’an: Shandong Agricultural University, 2007. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]	王大成, 陈朗, 罗小平. 影响波纹换热管换热性能因素的数值模拟研究[J]. 低温与超导, 2012, 40(7): 54-58.
	WANG D C, CHEN L, LUO X P. Numerical simulation research on the factors influencing the heat exchange performance of corrugated tubes[J]. Cryogenics & Superconductivity, 2012, 40(7): 54-58. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]	王晓静, 李文艳, 孙启蒙. 基于FLUENT的内插扭带波纹管内流场分析[J]. 高校化学工程学报, 2016, 30(2): 286-291.
	WANG X J, LI W Y, SUN Q M. Flow field analysis of bellows with twist tape inserts using FLUENT[J]. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Chinese Universities, 2016, 30(2): 286-291. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]	张亮, 原亚东, 孙志强, 等. 波纹管对管壳式换热器内流体传热及流动特性的影响[J]. 热能动力工程, 2019, 34(4): 73-78.
	ZHANG L, YUAN Y D, SUN Z Q, et al. Effects of corrugated tube on heat transfer and flow characteristics of fluid in shell heat exchanger[J]. Journal of Engineering for Thermal Energy and Power, 2019, 34(4): 73-78. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]	刘伟, 杨洲, 段洁利, 等. 蓄冷式冷藏箱降温过程的数值模拟及试验验证[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2019, 40(4): 119-125.
	LIU W, YANG Z, DUAN J L, et al. Numerical simulation and experimental verification of cooling process in cool storage refrigerator[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2019, 40(4): 119-125. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]	杨庆璐, 王庆杰, 李洪文, 等. 气力集排式排肥系统结构优化与试验[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(13): 1-10.
	YANG Q L, WANG Q J, LI H W, et al. Structural optimization and experiment of pneumatic centralized fertilizer system[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2020, 36(13): 1-10. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[22]	周韦. 基于散粒体动力学的水田侧深施肥装置的分析方法和试验[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北农业大学, 2015.
	ZHOU W. The experiment and analysis of paddy field deep fertilizing device based on discrete element method[D]. Harbin: Northeast Agricultural University, 2015. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]	邹翌, 郝向泽, 何瑞银. 基于EDEM-fluent耦合的气流分配式排种器数值模拟与试验[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2017, 38(4): 110-116.
	ZOU Y, HAO X Z, HE R Y. Numerical simulation and experiment of air distribution seed-metering device based on coupled EDEM-Fluent[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2017, 38(4): 110-116. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24]	高观保. 风送式水稻侧深施肥装置关键部件设计与试验[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北农业大学, 2019.
	GAO G B. Design and experiment of key parts of side-depth fertilizer device with pneumatic conveying for paddy[D]. Harbin: Northeast Agricultural University, 2019. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25]	刘涛, 何瑞银, 陆静, 等. 基于EDEM的窝眼轮式油菜排种器排种性能仿真与试验[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2016, 37(3): 126-132.
	LIU T, HE R Y, LU J, et al. Simulation and verification on seeding performance of nest hole wheel seed-metering device based on EDEM[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2016, 37(3): 126-132. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26]	郭晓冬. 水稻侧深施肥机气力系统研究及整机设计[D]. 杭州: 浙江理工大学, 2020.
	GUO X D. Analysis of pneumatic conveying system of ferlizer applicator on the side of rice[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, 2020. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[27]	李立伟, 武广伟, 付卫强, 等. 水田风送施肥参数检测试验台设计与试验[J]. 农业机械学报, 2020, 51(S1): 186-194.
	LI L W, WU G W, FU W Q, et al. Design and verification of test bed for testing parameters of wind assisted fertilization in paddy field[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2020, 51(S1): 186-194. (in Chinese with English abstract)

基于CFD-DEM的排肥用波纹管结构优化设计与试验

Numerical analysis of flow characteristics and structural optimization of bellows based on CFD-DEM

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 16

参考文献 27

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	朱潇, 朱颖, 李宏军, 陈善峰. 挤压制备燕麦鹰嘴豆复配米的工艺优化及其品质[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(5): 1149-1158.
[2]	徐汇镔, 朱洁, 周朝生, 胡园, 陆荣茂. 基于响应面分析的养殖水产品中高风险喹诺酮类抗生素残留及其基质效应研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(3): 689-700.
[3]	周毛措, 卢建雄, 郭晓农, 冯玉兰, 柴薇薇, 高鹏飞. 基于响应面法优化藜麦秸秆发酵工艺[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(9): 2020-2030.
[4]	邵亚旭, 刘涛, 王事成, 晏磊. 秸秆-有机肥育秧基质的配比筛选与成型工艺[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(8): 1856-1866.
[5]	曹乃馨, 罗阳兰, 阎勇, 解修超, 张雯龙. 桑树桑黄JM-1胞外多糖液态培养基优化及其抗氧化性研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(6): 1245-1255.
[6]	张晋, 吴晓丽, 田雨薇, 赵珂, 李欢欢, 达色, 次仁达杰, 陈黎洪, 唐宏刚. 超声波辅助酶解牦牛血粉提取氯化血红素的响应面工艺优化及品质表征[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(6): 1357-1367.
[7]	彭正菊, 谌迪, 张岑, 卢文静, 喻宏应, 郭慧媛, 蒋晗, 肖朝耿. 蜂胶油提物的制备及抗氧化活性研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(10): 2338-2346.
[8]	辛亚鹏, 王琳, 施印炎, 汪小旵, 吴昌伟, 刘慧. 离心式变量撒肥机关键结构数值模拟与优化[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(6): 1452-1461.
[9]	王海基, 王敏, 卢勇涛, 营雨琨, 王吉亮, 薛理, 秦朝民, 何玉泽. 弹齿链耙式残膜回收机链耙装置的设计与试验[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(10): 2465-2476.
[10]	吕敬, 吴治勇, 郭晓农, 冯玉兰, 卢建雄, 柴薇薇. 基于响应面法的乳酸菌发酵藜麦秸秆工艺条件优化[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(9): 1866-1876.
[11]	杨叶爽, 张映萍, 陈伊凡, 张晋, 李欢欢, 陈黎洪, 唐宏刚, 高斌. 响应面法优化复配蛋液配方[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(1): 153-162.
[12]	贾洋洋, 聂枞宁, 罗兴禹, 杨凯辉, 何春雷. 外源酶辅助发酵加工藏茶的工艺研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(9): 1720-1729.
[13]	姜兴粲, 李冰, 杨敏, 张继瑜. 响应面法优化沙拉沙星/β-环糊精包合物制备工艺与稳定性评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(3): 404-412.
[14]	杨颖, 施迎春, 邢建荣, 刘哲, 郑美瑜, 陆胜民. 葡萄柚精油“除萜赋香”工艺的优化研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(11): 2128-2136.
[15]	李启思, 王雅玲, 邓玉华, 廖建萌, 叶林, 吴莉莉, 郑佳纯, 罗杏燕, 邓旗, 孙力军. 五味子木脂素超声提取工艺优化及其抗氧化和抗真菌的潜力[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(11): 2145-2154.