浙江农业学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (11): 2428-2437.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2022.11.12
张健利1,2,3(
), 王振华1,2,3,*(
), 陈睿1,2,3, 王东旺1,2,3, 梁永辉1,2,3, 刘茹华1,2,3
收稿日期:2022-01-19
出版日期:2022-11-25
发布日期:2022-11-29
作者简介:*王振华,E-mail:wzh2002027@163.com通讯作者:
王振华
基金资助:
ZHANG Jianli1,2,3(
), WANG Zhenhua1,2,3,*(
), CHEN Rui1,2,3, WANG Dongwang1,2,3, LIANG Yonghui1,2,3, LIU Ruhua1,2,3
Received:2022-01-19
Online:2022-11-25
Published:2022-11-29
Contact:
WANG Zhenhua
摘要:
以成龄红枣为试验材料,设置2个灌溉水平(W1,6 000 m3·hm-2;W2,6 600 m3·hm-2)和3个基肥水平(S1、S2、S3,生物有机肥施用量分别为1 200、1 650、2 100 kg·hm-2),以不施用生物有机肥的作为对照(W1CK,W2CK),共8个处理,开展田间试验。结果表明:同一灌溉水平下,随生物有机肥施用量的增加,红枣梢长、梢粗、叶绿素相对含量、果实形态,及0~150 cm土壤有效钾、速效磷、铵态氮含量逐渐增加。在相同生物有机肥施用量下,随灌水量增加,0~150 cm土壤有效钾、速效磷、铵态氮含量减少。与对照(CK)相比,W1和W2灌溉水平下施用生物有机肥处理的单株产量分别增加4.65%~19.83%和8.17%~19.08%。施加生物有机肥可提高红枣的总糖、维生素C、可溶性固形物含量,降低总酸含量。各处理对比,W1S3处理的果实形态、单株产量和品质指标均不劣于W2CK处理。基于新疆干旱少雨的气候特点,在6 000 m3·hm-2的灌溉水平下配施2 100 kg·hm-2的生物有机肥,可替代当地常规灌溉施肥方案,较适宜于南疆干旱地区的红枣种植。
中图分类号:
张健利, 王振华, 陈睿, 王东旺, 梁永辉, 刘茹华. 水肥互作对滴灌红枣产量、品质与土壤养分的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(11): 2428-2437.
ZHANG Jianli, WANG Zhenhua, CHEN Rui, WANG Dongwang, LIANG Yonghui, LIU Ruhua. Effect of water-fertilizer interaction on yield, quality and soil nutrients of drip irrigated jujube[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(11): 2428-2437.
图1 不同处理对滴灌红枣梢长和梢粗的影响 柱上无相同字母的表示处理间差异显著(P<0.05)。下同。
Fig.1 Effect of different treatments on branch length and width of drip irrigated jujube Bars marked without the same letters indicated significant difference at P<0.05. The same as below.
| 灌溉水平 Irrigation level | 基肥水平 Base fertilizer level | 叶绿素含量(SPAD值)Chlorophyll content (SPAD value) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 新稍期 New shoot stage | 花期 Florescence | 果实膨大期 Fruit expansion stage | 完熟期 Full ripen stage | ||
| W1 | CK | 23.60±0.82 e | 30.60±1.08 f | 46.43±1.29 f | 35.83±1.22 e |
| S1 | 24.13±0.65 de | 31.60±0.66 ef | 47.93±0.84 ef | 37.23±0.85 de | |
| S2 | 24.83±0.45 cde | 32.43±0.55 de | 49.33±0.96 de | 38.40±1.41 d | |
| S3 | 25.17±0.68 bcd | 34.77±1.31 bc | 50.63±0.84 cd | 39.00±0.85 cd | |
| W2 | CK | 25.00±0.66 cd | 33.43±1.01 cd | 49.73±1.04 de | 38.93±0.61 cd |
| S1 | 25.70±0.60 abc | 35.07±0.55 bc | 52.30±0.53 c | 40.23±0.99 bc | |
| S2 | 26.40±1.15 ab | 35.53±0.86 ab | 54.20±1.04 b | 41.53±0.55 ab | |
| S3 | 26.67±0.65 a | 36.80±0.95 a | 57.67±0.78 a | 43.03±1.03 a | |
表1 不同处理下红枣不同生育期的叶绿素相对含量(SPAD值)
Table 1 Relative chlorophyll content (SPAD value) of jujube at different growth period under different treatments
| 灌溉水平 Irrigation level | 基肥水平 Base fertilizer level | 叶绿素含量(SPAD值)Chlorophyll content (SPAD value) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 新稍期 New shoot stage | 花期 Florescence | 果实膨大期 Fruit expansion stage | 完熟期 Full ripen stage | ||
| W1 | CK | 23.60±0.82 e | 30.60±1.08 f | 46.43±1.29 f | 35.83±1.22 e |
| S1 | 24.13±0.65 de | 31.60±0.66 ef | 47.93±0.84 ef | 37.23±0.85 de | |
| S2 | 24.83±0.45 cde | 32.43±0.55 de | 49.33±0.96 de | 38.40±1.41 d | |
| S3 | 25.17±0.68 bcd | 34.77±1.31 bc | 50.63±0.84 cd | 39.00±0.85 cd | |
| W2 | CK | 25.00±0.66 cd | 33.43±1.01 cd | 49.73±1.04 de | 38.93±0.61 cd |
| S1 | 25.70±0.60 abc | 35.07±0.55 bc | 52.30±0.53 c | 40.23±0.99 bc | |
| S2 | 26.40±1.15 ab | 35.53±0.86 ab | 54.20±1.04 b | 41.53±0.55 ab | |
| S3 | 26.67±0.65 a | 36.80±0.95 a | 57.67±0.78 a | 43.03±1.03 a | |
| 灌溉水平 Irrigation level | 基肥水平 Base fertilizer level | 有效钾 Available potassium | 速效磷 Available phosphorus | 铵态氮 Ammonium nitrogen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| W1 | CK | 60.90±5.97 cd | 20.14±1.75 cd | 0.81±0.07 cd |
| S1 | 69.86±8.68 bc | 22.11±1.18 bcd | 1.12±0.29 abc | |
| S2 | 79.26±9.07 ab | 26.01±3.54 abc | 1.25±0.13 ab | |
| S3 | 83.51±4.29 a | 28.59±5.32 a | 1.40±0.26 a | |
| W2 | CK | 52.20±6.17 d | 17.20±1.94 d | 0.75±0.11 d |
| S1 | 59.85±3.56 cd | 21.57±3.71 bcd | 1.01±0.16 bcd | |
| S2 | 70.09±7.09 bc | 25.28±2.07 abc | 1.26±0.10 ab | |
| S3 | 76.45±3.23 ab | 26.58±3.21 ab | 1.46±0.19 a |
表2 不同处理对枣田土壤养分的影响
Table 2 Effect of different treatments on soil nutrients mg·kg-1
| 灌溉水平 Irrigation level | 基肥水平 Base fertilizer level | 有效钾 Available potassium | 速效磷 Available phosphorus | 铵态氮 Ammonium nitrogen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| W1 | CK | 60.90±5.97 cd | 20.14±1.75 cd | 0.81±0.07 cd |
| S1 | 69.86±8.68 bc | 22.11±1.18 bcd | 1.12±0.29 abc | |
| S2 | 79.26±9.07 ab | 26.01±3.54 abc | 1.25±0.13 ab | |
| S3 | 83.51±4.29 a | 28.59±5.32 a | 1.40±0.26 a | |
| W2 | CK | 52.20±6.17 d | 17.20±1.94 d | 0.75±0.11 d |
| S1 | 59.85±3.56 cd | 21.57±3.71 bcd | 1.01±0.16 bcd | |
| S2 | 70.09±7.09 bc | 25.28±2.07 abc | 1.26±0.10 ab | |
| S3 | 76.45±3.23 ab | 26.58±3.21 ab | 1.46±0.19 a |
| 灌溉水平 Irrigation level | 基肥水平 Base fertilizer level | 果实纵径 Fruit longitudinal diameter/cm | 果实横径 Fruit equatorial diameter/cm | 单果质量 Single fruit weight/g | 单株产量 Yield per tree/kg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W1 | CK | 48.29±0.87 e | 33.22±0.75 e | 15.55±0.58 e | 4.14±0.36 d |
| S1 | 49.52±0.95 de | 33.92±0.60 de | 15.97±1.11 e | 4.33±0.25 cd | |
| S2 | 49.64±1.07 de | 34.10±0.56 cde | 16.34±0.64 de | 4.44±0.32 cd | |
| S3 | 52.13±0.32 bc | 35.22±0.45 c | 17.95±0.18 c | 4.96±0.22 b | |
| W2 | CK | 50.71±0.80 cd | 34.91±1.10 cd | 17.40±0.67 cd | 4.67±0.21 bc |
| S1 | 53.20±0.85 b | 36.72±0.44 b | 19.30±0.31 b | 5.05±0.19 b | |
| S2 | 54.83±0.79 a | 37.96±0.53 a | 20.53±0.87 a | 5.52±0.31 a | |
| S3 | 54.88±0.78 a | 38.69±0.34 a | 20.65±0.53 a | 5.56±0.22 a |
表3 不同处理下的红枣果实形态与产量
Table 3 Fruit morphology and yield of jujube under different treatments
| 灌溉水平 Irrigation level | 基肥水平 Base fertilizer level | 果实纵径 Fruit longitudinal diameter/cm | 果实横径 Fruit equatorial diameter/cm | 单果质量 Single fruit weight/g | 单株产量 Yield per tree/kg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W1 | CK | 48.29±0.87 e | 33.22±0.75 e | 15.55±0.58 e | 4.14±0.36 d |
| S1 | 49.52±0.95 de | 33.92±0.60 de | 15.97±1.11 e | 4.33±0.25 cd | |
| S2 | 49.64±1.07 de | 34.10±0.56 cde | 16.34±0.64 de | 4.44±0.32 cd | |
| S3 | 52.13±0.32 bc | 35.22±0.45 c | 17.95±0.18 c | 4.96±0.22 b | |
| W2 | CK | 50.71±0.80 cd | 34.91±1.10 cd | 17.40±0.67 cd | 4.67±0.21 bc |
| S1 | 53.20±0.85 b | 36.72±0.44 b | 19.30±0.31 b | 5.05±0.19 b | |
| S2 | 54.83±0.79 a | 37.96±0.53 a | 20.53±0.87 a | 5.52±0.31 a | |
| S3 | 54.88±0.78 a | 38.69±0.34 a | 20.65±0.53 a | 5.56±0.22 a |
| 灌溉水平 Irrigation level | 基肥水平 Base fertilizer level | 总糖 Total sugar/% | 可溶性固形物 Total soluble solid/% | 总酸 Total acidity/% | 维生素C Vitamin C/(mg·kg-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W1 | CK | 27.04±0.15 e | 29.21±0.44 e | 0.120±0.017 bcd | 630.2±10.6 e |
| S1 | 27.72±0.59 d | 29.68±0.63 de | 0.117±0.024 bcd | 654.2±26.3 de | |
| S2 | 28.25±0.36 cd | 30.08±0.62 cd | 0.107±0.020 cd | 681.4±20.8 d | |
| S3 | 29.39±0.23 b | 31.50±0.56 b | 0.091±0.011 d | 755.9±16.5 bc | |
| W2 | CK | 28.66±0.23 c | 30.56±0.31 c | 0.167±0.030 a | 731.2±12.2 c |
| S1 | 29.92±0.53 ab | 31.98±0.46 ab | 0.154±0.029 ab | 790.2±23.6 b | |
| S2 | 30.48±0.29 a | 32.48±0.27a | 0.137±0.019 abc | 827.0±19.5 a | |
| S3 | 30.49±0.16 a | 32.51±0.23 a | 0.121±0.020 bcd | 834.7±26.3 a |
表4 不同处理对红枣品质的影响
Table 4 Effect of different treatments on jujube quality
| 灌溉水平 Irrigation level | 基肥水平 Base fertilizer level | 总糖 Total sugar/% | 可溶性固形物 Total soluble solid/% | 总酸 Total acidity/% | 维生素C Vitamin C/(mg·kg-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W1 | CK | 27.04±0.15 e | 29.21±0.44 e | 0.120±0.017 bcd | 630.2±10.6 e |
| S1 | 27.72±0.59 d | 29.68±0.63 de | 0.117±0.024 bcd | 654.2±26.3 de | |
| S2 | 28.25±0.36 cd | 30.08±0.62 cd | 0.107±0.020 cd | 681.4±20.8 d | |
| S3 | 29.39±0.23 b | 31.50±0.56 b | 0.091±0.011 d | 755.9±16.5 bc | |
| W2 | CK | 28.66±0.23 c | 30.56±0.31 c | 0.167±0.030 a | 731.2±12.2 c |
| S1 | 29.92±0.53 ab | 31.98±0.46 ab | 0.154±0.029 ab | 790.2±23.6 b | |
| S2 | 30.48±0.29 a | 32.48±0.27a | 0.137±0.019 abc | 827.0±19.5 a | |
| S3 | 30.49±0.16 a | 32.51±0.23 a | 0.121±0.020 bcd | 834.7±26.3 a |
| 指标Index | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | 0.959** | |||||||||
| C | 0.912** | 0.957** | ||||||||
| D | 0.236 | 0.469 | 0.580 | |||||||
| E | 0.232 | 0.472 | 0.574 | 0.996** | ||||||
| F | 0.160 | 0.399 | 0.517 | 0.993** | 0.992** | |||||
| G | -0.879** | -0.761* | -0.644 | 0.195 | 0.177 | 0.257 | ||||
| H | 0.217 | 0.452 | 0.577 | 0.988** | 0.991** | 0.988** | 0.188 | |||
| I | 0.160 | 0.387 | 0.538 | 0.958** | 0.958** | 0.968** | 0.239 | 0.982** | ||
| J | 0.139 | 0.383 | 0.509 | 0.978** | 0.982** | 0.988** | 0.260 | 0.993** | 0.991** | |
| K | 0.166 | 0.400 | 0.533 | 0.984** | 0.983** | 0.994** | 0.245 | 0.990** | 0.989** | 0.995** |
表5 土壤养分与红枣品质、产量等指标间相关性
Table 5 Correlations of soil nutrients and jujube quality and yield
| 指标Index | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | 0.959** | |||||||||
| C | 0.912** | 0.957** | ||||||||
| D | 0.236 | 0.469 | 0.580 | |||||||
| E | 0.232 | 0.472 | 0.574 | 0.996** | ||||||
| F | 0.160 | 0.399 | 0.517 | 0.993** | 0.992** | |||||
| G | -0.879** | -0.761* | -0.644 | 0.195 | 0.177 | 0.257 | ||||
| H | 0.217 | 0.452 | 0.577 | 0.988** | 0.991** | 0.988** | 0.188 | |||
| I | 0.160 | 0.387 | 0.538 | 0.958** | 0.958** | 0.968** | 0.239 | 0.982** | ||
| J | 0.139 | 0.383 | 0.509 | 0.978** | 0.982** | 0.988** | 0.260 | 0.993** | 0.991** | |
| K | 0.166 | 0.400 | 0.533 | 0.984** | 0.983** | 0.994** | 0.245 | 0.990** | 0.989** | 0.995** |
| [1] | 孙晓莉, 田寿乐, 沈广宁, 等. 山东省4种主要干果的产业现状及发展对策[J]. 河北科技师范学院学报, 2017, 31(3): 56-60. |
| SUN X L, TIAN S L, SHEN G N, et al. Current situation and development countermeasures of dried fruit industry in Shandong Province[J]. Journal of Hebei Normal University of Science & Technology, 2017, 31(3): 56-60. (in Chinese) | |
| [2] | 宁强. 我国枣主产区发展现状及土地可持续利用分析[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2016, 37(7): 130-134. |
| NING Q. Analysis on the current situation and sustainable development of Chinese jujube main producing areas[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2016, 37(7): 130-134. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [3] | 曲成闯, 陈效民, 张志龙, 等. 生物有机肥提高设施土壤生产力减缓黄瓜连作障碍的机制[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2019, 25(5): 814-823. |
| QU C C, CHEN X M, ZHANG Z L, et al. Mechanism of bio-organic fertilizer on improving soil productivity for continuous cucumber in greenhouse[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2019, 25(5): 814-823. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [4] |
孙家骏, 付青霞, 谷洁, 等. 生物有机肥对猕猴桃土壤酶活性和微生物群落的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(3): 829-837.
DOI |
| SUN J J, FU Q X, GU J, et al. Effects of bio-organic fertilizer on soil enzyme activities and microbial community in kiwifruit orchard[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016, 27(3): 829-837. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [5] | 闫鹏科, 常少刚, 孙权, 等. 施用生物有机肥对枸杞产量、品质及土壤肥力的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2019(5): 112-118. |
| YAN P K, CHANG S G, SUN Q, et al. Effect of bio-organic fertilizer on yield, quality and soil fertility of wolfberry[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2019(5): 112-118. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [6] | 李停锋, 李雯, 郭君钰, 等. 生物有机肥对连作压砂田土壤肥力及西瓜品质的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2020(5): 109-116. |
| LI T F, LI W, GUO J Y, et al. Effects of bio-organic fertilizer on soil fertility and watermelon quality in continuous cropping sand pressing field[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2020(5): 109-116. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [7] | HABASHY N R, ABOU A W, ZAKI R N. Effect of organic and bio-fertilizers on phosphorus and some micronutrients availability in a calcareous soil[J]. Research Journal of Agriculture & Biological Sciences, 2008, 4(5): 545-552. |
| [8] |
LI Z Y, ZONG R, WANG T Y, et al. Adapting root distribution and improving water use efficiency via drip irrigation in a jujube (Zizyphus jujuba Mill.) orchard after long-term flood irrigation[J]. Agriculture, 2021, 11(12): 1184.
DOI URL |
| [9] |
石培君, 刘洪光, 何新林, 等. 水肥耦合对滴灌矮化密植大枣生理变化及产量影响[J]. 核农学报, 2018, 32(1): 177-187.
DOI |
| SHI P J, LIU H G, HE X L, et al. The influence of water and fertilizer coupling on physiological change and yield of dwarf dense planting jujube under drip irrigation[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 32(1): 177-187. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [10] | 周罕觅, 张富仓, KJELGREN R, 等. 水肥耦合对苹果幼树产量、品质和水肥利用的效应[J]. 农业机械学报, 2015, 46(12): 173-183. |
| ZHOU H M, ZHANG F C, KJELGREN R, et al. Effects of water and fertilizer coupling on yield, fruit quality and water and fertilizer use efficiency of young apple tree[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2015, 46(12): 173-183. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [11] | 柴仲平, 王雪梅, 孙霞, 等. 水氮耦合对枣树生长与产量的影响[J]. 水土保持研究, 2012, 19(2): 201-204. |
| CHAI Z P, WANG X M, SUN X, et al. Influence on growth and yield of Zizyphus jujuba under coupling of water and nitrogen[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2012, 19(2): 201-204. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [12] | 李彦君, 庄丽, 徐红军, 等. 水氮耦合对北疆地区春小麦光合特性及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2013, 50(2): 204-213. |
| LI Y J, ZHUANG L, XU H J, et al. Effects of water-nitrogen coupling on photosynthetic characteristics and yield of spring wheat in northern Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 50(2): 204-213. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [13] | 杜清洁, 李建明, 潘铜华, 等. 滴灌条件下水肥耦合对番茄产量及综合品质的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2015, 33(3): 10-17. |
| DU Q J, LI J M, PAN T H, et al. The compound effects of water and fertilizer on yield and quality of tomato under drip irrigation[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2015, 33(3): 10-17. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [14] |
王士杰, 尹光华, 李忠, 等. 浅埋滴灌水肥耦合对辽西半干旱区春玉米产量的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(1): 139-147.
DOI |
| WANG S J, YIN G H, LI Z, et al. Effects of water-fertilizer coupling on the yield of spring maize under shallow-buried drip irrigation in semi-arid region of western Liaoning Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 31(1): 139-147. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [15] |
YU Q G, YE J, YANG S N, et al. Effects of nitrogen application level on rice nutrient uptake and ammonia volatilization[J]. Rice Science, 2013, 20(2): 139-147.
DOI URL |
| [16] | 徐国伟, 王贺正, 翟志华, 等. 不同水氮耦合对水稻根系形态生理、产量与氮素利用的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2015, 31(10): 132-141. |
| XU G W, WANG H Z, ZHAI Z H, et al. Effect of water and nitrogen coupling on root morphology and physiology, yield and nutrition utilization for rice[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2015, 31(10): 132-141. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [17] | 钟松, 高俊程, 董世魁, 等. 黄河源区高寒草原土壤对不同PGPR菌肥的响应[J]. 兰州大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 57(3): 294-301. |
| ZHONG S, GAO J C, DONG S K, et al. The response of alpine grassland soil to different PGPR bacterial fertilizers in the source region of the Yellow River[J]. Journal of Lanzhou University (Natural Sciences), 2021, 57(3): 294-301. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [18] | 王振华, 扁青永, 李文昊, 等. 南疆沙区成龄红枣水肥一体化滴灌的水肥适宜用量[J]. 农业工程学报, 2018, 34(11): 96-104. |
| WANG Z H, BIAN Q Y, LI W H, et al. Suitable water and fertilizer amount for mature jujube with drip-irrigation under fertigation in southern Xinjiang sandy area[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2018, 34(11): 96-104. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [19] | 车银伟, 杨器, 代顺冬, 等. 涌泉根灌对山地红枣产量与品质的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2013, 22(11): 108-113. |
| CHE Y W, YANG Q, DAI S D, et al. Effects of bubble-root irrigation on yield and quality of jujube in hills[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Occidentalis Sinica, 2013, 22(11): 108-113. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [20] |
姜莉莉, 王开运, 武玉国, 等. 施用生物有机肥对番茄果实品质及土壤生物学特性的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2020, 35(6): 141-147.
DOI |
|
JIANG L L, WANG K Y, WU Y G, et al. Effect of application of bioorganic fertilizer on tomatoes fruit quality and soil biological characteristics[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2020, 35(6): 141-147. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI |
|
| [21] | 王亚雄, 常少刚, 王锐, 等. 不同有机肥对宁夏枸杞生长、产量及品质的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2019(5): 91-95. |
| WANG Y X, CHANG S G, WANG R, et al. Effects of different organic fertilizers on growth, yield and quality of Lycium barbarum L[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2019(5): 91-95. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [22] | 陈会鲜, 曹升, 严华兵, 等. 增施生物有机肥对食用木薯产量及品质的影响[J]. 热带作物学报, 2019, 40(3): 417-424. |
| CHEN H X, CAO S, YAN H B, et al. The effect of increasing bio-organic fertilizer on the yield and quality of edible-cassava[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2019, 40(3): 417-424. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [23] | 杨云高, 王树林, 刘国, 等. 生物有机肥对烤烟产质量及土壤改良的影响[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2012, 33(4): 70-74. |
| YANG Y G, WANG S L, LIU G, et al. Effects of bio-organic fertilizer on yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco and soil improvement[J]. Chinese Tobacco Science, 2012, 33(4): 70-74. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [24] | 陈新斌, 孙锦, 郭世荣, 等. 海水胁迫对菠菜叶绿素代谢的影响[J]. 西北植物学报, 2012, 32(9): 1781-1787. |
| CHEN X B, SUN J, GUO S R, et al. Chlorophyll metabolism of spinach leaves under seawater stress[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2012, 32(9): 1781-1787. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [25] | 臧小平, 周兆禧, 林兴娥, 等. 不同用量有机肥对芒果果实品质及土壤肥力的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2016(1): 98-101. |
| ZANG X P, ZHOU Z X, LIN X G, et al. Effects of different organic manure application rate on mango fruit quality and soil fertility[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2016(1): 98-101. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [26] | 张绪美, 曹亚茹, 沈文忠, 等. 微生物肥对设施土壤次生盐渍化和番茄生产的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2019(5): 119-126. |
| ZHANG X M, CAO Y R, SHEN W Z, et al. Effects of microbial fertilizer on soil secondary salinization and tomato production in protected cultivation[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2019(5): 119-126. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [27] | 任玉忠, 王水献, 谢蕾, 等. 干旱区不同灌溉方式对枣树水分利用效率和果实品质的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2012, 28(22): 95-102. |
| REN Y Z, WANG S X, XIE L, et al. Effects of irrigation methods on water use efficiency and fruit quality of jujube in arid area[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2012, 28(22): 95-102. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [28] | 叶胜兰, 刘天成. 不同滴灌制度对陕北山地梨枣产量及水分利用效率的影响[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2018, 37(1): 28-34. |
| YE S L, LIU T C. Effects of different drip irrigation systems on yield and water use efficiency of pear-jujube in the Loess Plateau[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2018, 37(1): 28-34. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [29] | 朱菜红, 董彩霞, 沈其荣, 等. 配施有机肥提高化肥氮利用效率的微生物作用机制研究[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2010, 16(2): 282-288. |
| ZHU C H, DONG C X, SHEN Q R, et al. Microbial mechanism on enhancement of inorganic fertilizer-N use efficiency for combined use of inorganic and organic fertilizers[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2010, 16(2): 282-288. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [1] | 许卫猛, 徐妍, 陈国立. 基于多种分析方法的糯玉米品质综合评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(9): 1840-1848. |
| [2] | 吴菊, 杨飞, 吴国泉, 傅贤, 徐晨光. 砂培和土壤栽培对黄瓜生长、产量与品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(9): 1905-1913. |
| [3] | 朱为静, 吴佳, 洪春来, 朱凤香, 洪磊东, 张涛, 张硕, 诸惠芬. 秸秆覆盖对土壤水热肥及蟠桃产量和品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(9): 1924-1932. |
| [4] | 贺世雄, 杨蕾, 齐安民, 程籍, 王敏, 李英奎, 洪林. 中间砧对3种杂柑叶片光合特性、理化指标和果实品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(8): 1680-1693. |
| [5] | 张顺昌, 徐继根, 符成悦, 蒲占湑, 胡丽鹏, 吴昊, 李俊兵, 辛亮, 雷元军. 喷施氨基酸钙对红美人杂柑果皮龟裂与品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(8): 1706-1715. |
| [6] | 张智颖, 邱琴, 侯立娟, 徐平, 蒋宁, 林金盛, 李辉平, 曲绍轩, 马林, 王伟霞, 李福后. 杀虫剂施用对秀珍菇和毛木耳的安全性评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(8): 1733-1742. |
| [7] | 严福林, 郎云虎, 简应权, 陈雄飞, 魏巍, 王志威, 安江勇, 任得强, 丁宁, 魏升华. 八爪金龙药材产量与品质对土壤理化性状的响应[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(8): 1766-1775. |
| [8] | 王呈阳, 刘洁雅, 吴敏怡, 谢博伊, 洪德成, 冷锋, 吴国泉. 钙处理对涝害下寒香蜜葡萄果实品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(7): 1451-1458. |
| [9] | 张若楠, 门小明, 秦凯鹏, 王彬彬, 吴杰, 丁向彬, 徐子伟, 齐珂珂. 绿嘉黑猪的不同杂交组合生长性能、胴体品质、产肉性能和收益比较研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(6): 1203-1211. |
| [10] | 项缨, 丛建民, 潘丹红, 陶永刚. 春大棚有机种植不同品种番茄的生育进程分析和综合评价研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(6): 1252-1261. |
| [11] | 刘文琦, 胡齐赞, 岳智臣, 陶鹏, 雷娟利, 李必元, 赵彦婷, 王华森. 夏季高温对叶用芥菜外观与营养品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(6): 1262-1271. |
| [12] | 张智, 何豪豪, 郁妙, 许剑锋. 化肥减量配施土壤改良剂对土壤酸度、土壤养分和水稻产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(6): 1301-1308. |
| [13] | 林小兵, 黎江, 成艳红, 王斌强, 何绍浪, 黄尚书, 黄欠如. 不同有机物料对土壤微生物生物量、矿质氮含量与水稻产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(6): 1309-1318. |
| [14] | 张程程, 范涛, 章检明, 赵风亮, 忻晓庭, 牛海月, 刘大群. 缙云梅干菜腌制过程中细菌群落与品质的变化[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(6): 1336-1343. |
| [15] | 岳丽, 庄红梅, 祖力皮牙·买买提, 王佳敏, 毛红艳, 张英仙, 尼格尔热依·亚迪卡尔, 于明. 基于主成分分析与聚类分析的芜菁肉质根质地品质综合评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(5): 1057-1071. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||