灌溉方式和种植方式对双季稻产量和稻米品质的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20240079

浙江农业学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (2): 257-268.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20240079

灌溉方式和种植方式对双季稻产量和稻米品质的影响

万绍媛¹(), 刘现波¹^,², 才硕¹^,^*(), 时红¹^,², 程婕¹

1.江西省灌溉试验中心站,江西南昌 330201
2.东华理工大学水资源与环境工程学院,江西南昌 330013

收稿日期:2024-01-16 出版日期:2025-02-25 发布日期:2025-03-20
作者简介:*才硕,E-mail:caishuo0911@163.com
万绍媛(1979—),女,江西南昌人,技术员,主要从事农田水利与农业生态技术研究。E-mail:562354632@qq.com
通讯作者: 才硕
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(31960377);南昌航空大学重点科研基地开放基金(EL202280080);长江科学院开放研究基金(CKWV2016400/KY)

Effect of irrigation and planting methods on the yield and quality of double-cropping rice

WAN Shaoyuan¹(), LIU Xianbo¹^,², CAI Shuo¹^,^*(), SHI Hong¹^,², CHENG Jie¹

1. Jiangxi Irrigation Experiment Central Station, Nanchang 330201, China
2. School of Water Resources & Environmental Engineering, East China University of Technology, Nanchang 330013, China

Received:2024-01-16 Online:2025-02-25 Published:2025-03-20
Contact: CAI Shuo

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以双季稻为研究对象开展小区试验,设置手工栽插、机械插秧、抛秧、直播4种种植方式与淹水灌溉和间歇灌溉2种灌溉方式,对比不同处理对双季稻全生育期水分利用效率、产量和稻米品质的影响。结果表明:相同种植方式下,间歇灌溉较淹水灌溉显著(P<0.05)降低了早稻和晚稻的耗水量,产量增加0.79%~2.94%,在相同灌溉方式下,各种植方式相比均以直播的产量最低,显著低于其他处理。相同种植方式下,间歇灌溉条件下早、晚稻的碾磨品质要优于淹水灌溉。在相同灌溉方式下,直播早稻、晚稻的整精米率显著低于其他处理。总的来看,与淹水灌溉相比,间歇灌溉能够增加早、晚稻的产量,减少耗水量,提高水分利用效率,提高稻米的碾磨品质。与移栽稻相比,直播稻的产量降低,晚稻的品质下降。综合比较,手工栽插并配合间歇灌溉的双季稻种植模式具有较好的节水、增产、优质的栽培效果。

关键词: 双季稻, 灌溉方式, 种植方式, 产量, 稻米品质, 水分利用效率

Abstract:

In the present study, double cropping rice was selected as the study object, a field experiment was carried out with four planting methods and two irrigation methods. The four panting methods were hand-planting, mechanical transplanting, seedling throwing and direct seeding, respectively, and the two irrigation methods were flooding irrigation and intermittent irrigation. The effects of different treatments with combinations of planting method and irrigation method were compared on the water use efficiency, yield and rice quality of double cropping rice. It was shown that the water consumption of early rice and late rice under intermittent irrigation was significantly (P<0.05) decreased than that under flooding irrigation with the same planting method, yet the yield of early rice and late rice was increased by 0.79%-2.94%. With the same irrigation method, the lowest yield of both early rice and late rice was found under the direct seeding method, which was significantly lower than the others. Under the same planting method, the milling quality of early rice and late rice with intermittent irrigation was better than that with flooding irrigation. Under the same irrigation method, the head rice rate of direct seeding early rice and late rice was significantly poorer than those with other planting methods. Overall, compared with the flooding irrigation, intermittent irrigation could increase the yield of early rice and late rice, decrease the water consumption, enhance the water use efficiency, improve the milling quality of rice. Compared with transplanting, direct seeding would lower the rice yield and quality of late rice. By comparison, the combination of hand-planting with intermittent irrigation exhibited good effect on water conservation, yield increase, and high quality of double cropping rice.

Key words: double-cropping rice, irrigation method, planting method, yield, rice quality, water use efficiency

中图分类号:

S511

万绍媛, 刘现波, 才硕, 时红, 程婕. 灌溉方式和种植方式对双季稻产量和稻米品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(2): 257-268.

WAN Shaoyuan, LIU Xianbo, CAI Shuo, SHI Hong, CHENG Jie. Effect of irrigation and planting methods on the yield and quality of double-cropping rice[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(2): 257-268.

图/表 8

参考文献 32

[1]	YUAN S, NIE L X, WANG F, et al. Agronomic performance of inbred and hybrid rice cultivars under simplified and reduced-input practices[J]. Field Crops Research, 2017, 210: 129-135.
[2]	刘现波, 才硕, 时红, 等. 种植方式变化下双季稻田水氮流失与调控研究概述[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2023, 51(13): 17-23.
	LIU X B, CAI S, SHI H, et al. Research overview of water and nitrogen loss and regulation in double-cropping paddy fields under changing planting methods[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 51(13): 17-23. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]	罗锡文, 廖娟, 臧英, 等. 我国农业生产的发展方向:从机械化到智慧化[J]. 中国工程科学, 2022, 24(1): 46-54.
	LUO X W, LIAO J, ZANG Y, et al. Developing from mechanized to smart agricultural production in China[J]. Strategic Study of CAE, 2022, 24(1): 46-54. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]	尹必文, 曹明龙, 唐淑菊. 水稻不同种植方式的优缺点及成本分析[J]. 现代农业科技, 2020(12): 52-53.
	YIN B W, CAO M L, TANG S J. Advantages, disadvantages and cost analysis of different rice planting methods[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020(12): 52-53. (in Chinese)
[5]	丁得亮, 崔晶, 张欣, 等. 我国粳稻食味品质研究进展[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2010, 38(2): 1-4.
	DING D L, CUI J, ZHANG X, et al. Research progress on edible quality of japonica rice in China[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2010, 38(2): 1-4. (in Chinese)
[6]	BIAN J L, XU F F, HAN C, et al. Effects of planting methods on yield and quality of different types of japonica rice in northern Jiangsu Plain, China[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2018, 17(12): 2624-2635.
[7]	雷振山, 李猛, 卫云飞, 等. 不同种植方式对豫南地区优质食味粳稻产量及品质的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2023, 52(2): 12-20.
	LEI Z S, LI M, WEI Y F, et al. Effects of different rice planting methods on yield and quality of japonica rice with good eating quality in southern Henan Province[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 52(2): 12-20. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	郭保卫, 唐闯, 王岩, 等. 两种机械化种植方式对优质晚籼稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(20): 3910-3925.
	GUO B W, TANG C, WANG Y, et al. Effects of two mechanical planting methods on the yield and quality of high-quality late indica rice[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(20): 3910-3925. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	韩超, 许方甫, 卞金龙, 等. 淮北地区机械化种植方式对不同生育类型优质食味粳稻产量及品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(11): 1681-1693.
	HAN C, XU F F, BIAN J L, et al. Effects of mechanical planting methods on yield and quality of japonica rice with good taste and different growth durations in Huaibei Region[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2018, 44(11): 1681-1693. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]	吴海兵, 刘道红, 钟鸣, 等. 水分管理和钾肥施用对水稻产量和抗倒伏性的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2019(1): 127-133.
	WU H B, LIU D H, ZHONG M, et al. Effects of water management and potash application on grain yield and lodging resistance of rice[J]. Crops, 2019(1): 127-133. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]	赵雪涵. 秸秆还田下灌溉方式对水稻产量及品质的影响[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北农业大学, 2020.
	ZHAO X H. Effects of irrigation regimes on rice yield and quality under straw returning[D]. Harbin: Northeast Agricultural University, 2020. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]	熊若愚, 解嘉鑫, 谭雪明, 等. 不同灌溉方式对南方优质食味晚籼稻产量及品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(7): 1512-1524.
	XIONG R Y, XIE J X, TAN X M, et al. Effects of irrigation management on grain yield and quality of high-quality eating late-season indica rice in South China[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(7): 1512-1524. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]	吴汉, 吴含, 钱娜, 等. 江淮地区不同灌溉与种植方式对水稻产量及水分利用效率的影响[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2022, 41(6): 39-46.
	WU H, WU H, QIAN N, et al. The effects of different combinations of irrigation and planting method on yield and water use efficiency of rice in Jianghuai Region[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2022, 41(6): 39-46. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]	丛舒敏, 余恩唯, 蔡沁, 等. 结实期温光胁迫对水稻产量和品质及淀粉理化特性的影响研究进展[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2023, 51(10): 20-29.
	CONG S M, YU E W, CAI Q, et al. Research progress on effects of temperature and light stress on yield and quality and starch physicochemical properties of rice at fruiting stage[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 51(10): 20-29. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]	池忠志, 姜心禄, 郑家国. 不同种植方式对水稻产量的影响及其经济效益比较[J]. 作物杂志, 2008(2): 73-75.
	CHI Z Z, JIANG X L, ZHENG J G. Comparison of yield and economic effect of rice under different planting patterns[J]. Crops, 2008(2): 73-75. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]	程建平, 罗锡文, 樊启洲, 等. 不同种植方式对水稻生育特性和产量的影响[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2010, 29(1): 1-5.
	CHENG J P, LUO X W, FAN Q Z, et al. Influence of different planting methods on growth and development characteristics and yield of rice[J]. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University, 2010, 29(1): 1-5. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]	李杰, 张洪程, 董洋阳, 等. 不同生态区栽培方式对水稻产量、生育期及温光利用的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44(13): 2661-2672.
	LI J, ZHANG H C, DONG Y Y, et al. Effects of cultivation methods on yield, growth stage and utilization of temperature and illumination of rice in different ecological regions[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2011, 44(13): 2661-2672. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]	金军, 薛艳凤, 于林惠, 等. 水稻不同种植方式群体质量差异比较[J]. 中国稻米, 2006, 12(6): 31-33.
	JIN J, XUE Y F, YU L H, et al. Comparison of mass quantity of rice in different planting manner[J]. China Rice, 2006, 12(6): 31-33. (in Chinese)
[19]	唐海明, 逄焕成, 肖小平, 等. 双季稻区不同栽培方式对早稻生育期、干物质积累及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2014, 40(4): 711-718.
	TANG H M, PANG H C, XIAO X P, et al. Effects of different cultivation methods on growth stage, dry matter accumulation, and yield of early rice in double cropping rice field[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2014, 40(4): 711-718. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]	徐一兰, 付爱斌, 刘唐兴. 不同栽培方式对双季稻植株干物质积累和产量的影响[J]. 作物研究, 2020, 34(2): 103-109.
	XU Y L, FU A B, LIU T X. Effects of different cultivation methods on dry matter accumulation and yield of double cropping rice[J]. Crop Research, 2020, 34(2): 103-109. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]	何海兵, 杨茹, 吴汉, 等. 干湿交替灌溉下氮素形态对水稻花期光合及产量形成的影响[J]. 西北植物学报, 2017, 37(11): 2230-2237.
	HE H B, YANG R, WU H, et al. Effects of N forms on photosynthesis at flowering and yield formation in wetting-drying alternation irrigation[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2017, 37(11): 2230-2237. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[22]	LI X K, WU L, GENG X, et al. Deciphering the environmental impacts on rice quality for different rice cultivated areas[J]. Rice, 2018, 11(1): 7.
[23]	李阳, 杨晓龙, 汪本福, 等. 播期对水稻机械旱直播产量及稻米品质的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2022, 36(8): 1648-1656.
	LI Y, YANG X L, WANG B F, et al. Effects of sowing dates on grain yield and rice quality under mechanical dry direct seeding[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 36(8): 1648-1656. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24]	霍中洋, 李杰, 许轲, 等. 高产栽培条件下种植方式对不同生育类型粳稻米质的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(19): 3932-3945.
	HUO Z Y, LI J, XU K, et al. Effect of planting methods on quality of different growth and development types of japonica rice under high-yielding cultivation condition[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(19): 3932-3945. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25]	张亚洁, 许德美, 孙斌, 等. 种植方式对陆稻和水稻籽粒灌浆及垩白的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2006, 39(2): 257-264.
	ZHANG Y J, XU D M, SUN B, et al. Effects of cultivation methods on grain-filling and chalky grains of upland and paddy rice[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2006, 39(2): 257-264. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26]	李杰, 张洪程, 龚金龙, 等. 不同种植方式对超级稻籽粒灌浆特性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2011, 37(9): 1631-1641.
	LI J, ZHANG H C, GONG J L, et al. Influence of planting methods on grain-filling properties of super rice[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2011, 37(9): 1631-1641. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[27]	杨晓龙, 王彪, 汪本福, 等. 不同水分管理方式对旱直播水稻产量和稻米品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 285-294.
	YANG X L, WANG B, WANG B F, et al. Effects of different water management on yield and rice quality of dry-seeded rice[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 285-294. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[28]	孟德龙, 杨波, 秦德荣, 等. 淮北稻区不同栽培方式稻米品质的比较[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2011, 39(6): 143-145.
	MENG D L, YANG B, QIN D R, et al. Comparison of rice quality under different cultivation methods in Huaibei rice area[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2011, 39(6): 143-145. (in Chinese)
[29]	BIAN J L, REN G L, HAN C, et al. Comparative analysis on grain quality and yield of different panicle weight indica-japonica hybrid rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2020, 19(4): 999-1009.
[30]	刘东华. 干旱胁迫对稻谷品质性状及W_X基因表达的影响[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2014.
	LIU D H. The impacts of drought stress on grain quality and Wx gene expression in rice[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2014. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[31]	ZHANG Y J, LIU G S, HUANG W X, et al. Effects of irrigation regimes on yield and quality of upland rice and paddy rice and their interaction with nitrogen rates[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2020, 241: 106344.
[32]	赵庆勇, 张亚东, 朱镇, 等. 播期与地点对不同生态类型粳稻淀粉RVA谱特性的影响[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2014, 30(1): 1-8.
	ZHAO Q Y, ZHANG Y D, ZHU Z, et al. Effects of sowing dates and sites on starch RVA profile characteristics of different ecological types of rice(Oryza sativa L. japonica)[J]. Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 30(1): 1-8. (in Chinese with English abstract)

稻季 Rice season	处理 Treatment	起止日期(月-日) Duration (month-day)	日平均温度 Average daily temperature/℃	日最高温度 Maximum daily temperature/℃	日最低温度 Minimum daily temperature/℃	耗水量 Water consumption/ (m³·hm^-2)	日照时数/h Daylight hours/h
早稻	HT-FI	06-08—07-12	27.96	31.49	25.07	2 110.40 ab	2.9
Early rice	ST-FI	06-10—07-12	28.13	31.72	25.18	1 736.87 c	3.0
	MT-FI	06-12—07-12	28.39	32.04	25.36	2 100.12 ab	3.1
	DS-FI	06-09—07-12	27.99	31.52	25.09	2 135.00 ab	3.0
	HT-II	06-08—07-12	27.96	31.49	25.07	2 190.67 a	2.9
	ST-II	06-10—07-12	28.13	31.72	25.18	1 803.77 c	3.0
	MT-II	06-12—07-12	28.39	32.04	25.36	1 909.00 bc	3.1
	DS-II	06-09—07-12	27.99	31.52	25.09	2 062.50 ab	3.0
晚稻	HT-FI	09-11—10-28	22.36	27.73	18.08	3 201.98 a	3.8
Late rice	ST-FI	09-13—10-28	22.15	27.54	17.89	2 806.58 b	3.9
	MT-FI	09-15—10-28	21.96	27.40	17.66	2 716.72 b	3.8
	DS-FI	09-21—11-07	20.55	25.79	16.47	2 325.38 b	3.8
	HT-II	09-11—10-28	22.36	27.73	18.08	2 236.99 b	3.8
	ST-II	09-13—10-28	22.15	27.54	17.89	2 240.37 b	3.9
	MT-II	09-15—10-28	21.96	27.40	17.66	2 528.32 b	3.8
	DS-II	09-21—11-07	20.55	25.79	16.47	1 752.46 c	3.8

稻季 Rice season	处理 Treatment	起止日期(月-日) Duration (month-day)	日平均温度 Average daily temperature/℃	日最高温度 Maximum daily temperature/℃	日最低温度 Minimum daily temperature/℃	耗水量 Water consumption/ (m³·hm^-2)	日照时数/h Daylight hours/h
早稻	HT-FI	06-08—07-12	27.96	31.49	25.07	2 110.40 ab	2.9
Early rice	ST-FI	06-10—07-12	28.13	31.72	25.18	1 736.87 c	3.0
	MT-FI	06-12—07-12	28.39	32.04	25.36	2 100.12 ab	3.1
	DS-FI	06-09—07-12	27.99	31.52	25.09	2 135.00 ab	3.0
	HT-II	06-08—07-12	27.96	31.49	25.07	2 190.67 a	2.9
	ST-II	06-10—07-12	28.13	31.72	25.18	1 803.77 c	3.0
	MT-II	06-12—07-12	28.39	32.04	25.36	1 909.00 bc	3.1
	DS-II	06-09—07-12	27.99	31.52	25.09	2 062.50 ab	3.0
晚稻	HT-FI	09-11—10-28	22.36	27.73	18.08	3 201.98 a	3.8
Late rice	ST-FI	09-13—10-28	22.15	27.54	17.89	2 806.58 b	3.9
	MT-FI	09-15—10-28	21.96	27.40	17.66	2 716.72 b	3.8
	DS-FI	09-21—11-07	20.55	25.79	16.47	2 325.38 b	3.8
	HT-II	09-11—10-28	22.36	27.73	18.08	2 236.99 b	3.8
	ST-II	09-13—10-28	22.15	27.54	17.89	2 240.37 b	3.9
	MT-II	09-15—10-28	21.96	27.40	17.66	2 528.32 b	3.8
	DS-II	09-21—11-07	20.55	25.79	16.47	1 752.46 c	3.8

稻季 Rice season	处理 Treatment	有效穗数 Effective panicle number/(10⁴ hm^-2)	穗粒数 Spikelet number per panicle	结实率 Seed-setting rate/%	千粒重 1 000-grain weight/g	实际产量 Actual yield/ (t·hm^-2)
早稻Early rice	HT-FI	361.14±26.16 ab	157.72±9.54 ab	85.72±5.39 a	26.45±0.42 ab	7.59±0.46 a
	ST-FI	375.28±23.31 ab	109.70±10.13 c	85.00±7.05 a	27.49±1.49 a	7.57±0.29 ab
	MT-FI	393.36±4.69 a	121.06±15.87 c	88.95±5.58 a	25.93±0.32 ab	7.48±0.55 ab
	DS-FI	215.61±8.79 c	158.52±25.30 ab	90.63±1.28 a	26.60±0.14 ab	6.71±0.24 c
	HT-II	386.54±10.76 a	169.58±15.11 a	85.07±2.33 a	26.11±0.28 ab	7.81±0.27 a
	ST-II	348.32±24.42 b	137.85±11.85 bc	83.42±2.02 a	27.30±0.08 a	7.63±0.20 a
	MT-II	382.31±12.32 ab	130.63±11.78 bc	89.11±7.85 a	25.60±1.40 b	7.70±0.24 a
	DS-II	212.42±22.00 c	172.50±4.67 a	89.56±3.64 a	27.22±0.47 ab	6.88±0.42 bc
晚稻Late rice	HT-FI	317.17±11.67 c	198.98±7.18 a	78.68±6.51 a	22.33±0.77 b	10.11±0.08 ab
	ST-FI	299.00±33.61 c	170.92±1.36 bc	73.68±10.84 a	22.15±0.77 b	9.77±0.44 abc
	MT-FI	388.32±21.32 b	155.33±19.02 cd	80.15±2.47 a	23.30±1.11 ab	9.27±0.57 c
	DS-FI	439.21±10.73 a	148.46±12.16 d	47.32±3.97 b	24.21±0.12 a	8.36±0.03 d
	HT-II	286.76±18.30 c	199.96±1.78 a	74.71±0.57 a	22.25±0.84 b	10.30±0.20 a
	ST-II	244.71±24.23 d	179.39±0.84 ab	83.53±4.50 a	22.27±0.56 b	9.89±0.32 abc
	MT-II	391.78±2.57 b	157.25±13.81 cd	80.75±2.89 a	23.40±0.41 ab	9.47±0.36 bc
	DS-II	412.30±20.70 ab	147.27±10.91 d	51.67±2.42 b	23.59±0.86 ab	8.52±0.36 d

稻季 Rice season	处理 Treatment	有效穗数 Effective panicle number/(10⁴ hm^-2)	穗粒数 Spikelet number per panicle	结实率 Seed-setting rate/%	千粒重 1 000-grain weight/g	实际产量 Actual yield/ (t·hm^-2)
早稻Early rice	HT-FI	361.14±26.16 ab	157.72±9.54 ab	85.72±5.39 a	26.45±0.42 ab	7.59±0.46 a
	ST-FI	375.28±23.31 ab	109.70±10.13 c	85.00±7.05 a	27.49±1.49 a	7.57±0.29 ab
	MT-FI	393.36±4.69 a	121.06±15.87 c	88.95±5.58 a	25.93±0.32 ab	7.48±0.55 ab
	DS-FI	215.61±8.79 c	158.52±25.30 ab	90.63±1.28 a	26.60±0.14 ab	6.71±0.24 c
	HT-II	386.54±10.76 a	169.58±15.11 a	85.07±2.33 a	26.11±0.28 ab	7.81±0.27 a
	ST-II	348.32±24.42 b	137.85±11.85 bc	83.42±2.02 a	27.30±0.08 a	7.63±0.20 a
	MT-II	382.31±12.32 ab	130.63±11.78 bc	89.11±7.85 a	25.60±1.40 b	7.70±0.24 a
	DS-II	212.42±22.00 c	172.50±4.67 a	89.56±3.64 a	27.22±0.47 ab	6.88±0.42 bc
晚稻Late rice	HT-FI	317.17±11.67 c	198.98±7.18 a	78.68±6.51 a	22.33±0.77 b	10.11±0.08 ab
	ST-FI	299.00±33.61 c	170.92±1.36 bc	73.68±10.84 a	22.15±0.77 b	9.77±0.44 abc
	MT-FI	388.32±21.32 b	155.33±19.02 cd	80.15±2.47 a	23.30±1.11 ab	9.27±0.57 c
	DS-FI	439.21±10.73 a	148.46±12.16 d	47.32±3.97 b	24.21±0.12 a	8.36±0.03 d
	HT-II	286.76±18.30 c	199.96±1.78 a	74.71±0.57 a	22.25±0.84 b	10.30±0.20 a
	ST-II	244.71±24.23 d	179.39±0.84 ab	83.53±4.50 a	22.27±0.56 b	9.89±0.32 abc
	MT-II	391.78±2.57 b	157.25±13.81 cd	80.75±2.89 a	23.40±0.41 ab	9.47±0.36 bc
	DS-II	412.30±20.70 ab	147.27±10.91 d	51.67±2.42 b	23.59±0.86 ab	8.52±0.36 d

处理 Treatment	出糙率Brown rice rate		精米率Milled rice rate		整精米率Head rice rate
处理 Treatment	早稻Early rice	晚稻Late rice	早稻Early rice	晚稻Late rice	早稻Early rice	晚稻Late rice
HT-FI	81.89±0.64 a	79.18±0.43 bc	61.00±1.01 abc	63.83±0.97 a	28.29±2.23 a	46.68±2.64 a
ST-FI	82.00±0.27 a	79.35±0.34 bc	62.79±2.88 a	65.15±1.81 a	28.91±5.21 a	45.31±1.55 a
MT-FI	82.07±0.23 a	78.93±0.33 c	61.83±1.07 abc	64.28±0.39 a	30.75±0.88 a	43.17±3.21 a
DS-FI	81.85±0.45 a	80.21±0.47 a	58.86±1.05 c	66.20±0.76 a	19.26±2.63 b	32.37±3.80 c
HT-II	82.24±0.09 a	79.39±0.34 bc	62.31±0.10 ab	64.67±1.13 a	32.20±3.96 a	47.03±0.79 a
ST-II	84.94±5.24 a	79.46±0.11 bc	61.77±2.22 abc	65.83±1.74 a	26.68±1.41 a	46.87±0.97 a
MT-II	82.01±0.23 a	79.45±0.34 bc	63.27±0.51 a	65.36±1.28 a	32.02±1.83 a	46.08±1.52 a
DS-II	81.44±0.52 a	79.64±0.14 ab	59.03±2.11 bc	66.04±0.80 a	20.36±1.52 b	37.32±2.13 b

灌溉方式和种植方式对双季稻产量和稻米品质的影响

Effect of irrigation and planting methods on the yield and quality of double-cropping rice

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 32

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

稻季 Rice season	处理 Treatment	粒长 Length/mm	粒型长宽比 Ratio of length to width	垩白粒率 Chalky rice percentage/%	垩白度 Chalkiness degree/%
早稻Early rice	HT-FI	5.53±0.04 a	2.16±0.01 bc	93.95±1.42 a	39.32±2.61 a
	ST-FI	5.55±0.03 a	2.17±0.01 ab	88.76±1.77 bc	38.29±1.74 a
	MT-FI	5.54±0.01 a	2.17±0.01 ab	90.23±1.83 abc	38.24±1.46 a
	DS-FI	5.51±0.01 a	2.14±0.01 d	92.66±2.33 ab	37.09±1.52 a
	HT-II	5.55±0.01 a	2.16±0.01 bc	93.11±1.11 ab	38.70±1.85 a
	ST-II	5.52±0.01 a	2.17±0.01 ab	90.31±0.72 abc	39.39±0.65 a
	MT-II	5.55±0.02 a	2.18±0.01 a	87.97±4.53 c	38.26±2.68 a
	DS-II	5.55±0.02 a	2.15±0.00 cd	93.67±1.13 a	40.31±0.94 a
晚稻Late rice	HT-FI	6.05±0.02 ab	2.83±0.01 ab	17.61±2.06 ab	4.98±0.58 c
	ST-FI	5.96±0.06 cd	2.81±0.03 ab	17.13±5.09 b	5.41±1.00 bc
	MT-FI	5.99±0.04 abcd	2.83±0.03 ab	18.19±0.65 ab	5.72±0.21 abc
	DS-FI	6.01±0.04 abc	2.81±0.02 ab	16.24±3.20 b	5.04±0.95 c
	HT-II	6.06±0.01 a	2.85±0.01 a	16.54±0.65 b	4.81±0.07 c
	ST-II	5.97±0.07 bcd	2.83±0.03 ab	20.84±2.84 ab	6.41±0.72 ab
	MT-II	5.92±0.04 d	2.79±0.01 b	23.01±0.54 a	6.76±0.24 a
	DS-II	6.04±0.02 abc	2.84±0.01 a	18.52±2.35 ab	5.54±0.71 abc

稻季 Rice season	处理 Treatment	峰值黏度 Peak viscosity/ (mPa·s)	热浆黏度 Hot paste viscosity/(mPa·s)	崩解值 Breakdown viscosity/(mPa·s)	冷胶黏度 Cool paste viscosity/(mPa·s)	消减值 Setback viscosity/ (mPa·s)	峰值时间 Peak time/min	糊化温度 Pasting temperature/℃
早稻	HT-FI	3 974.17 c	2 928.33 ab	1 045.83 c	4 880.50 ab	906.33 a	5.95 ab	81.38 a
Early	ST-FI	4 025.17 bc	3 048.17 ab	977.00 c	4 876.33 ab	851.17 a	6.06 a	81.78 a
rice	MT-FI	4 180.17 abc	2 854.33 b	1 325.83 a	4 830.83 b	650.67 b	5.79 b	81.81 a
	DS-FI	4 032.17 bc	2 912.17 ab	1 120.00 bc	4 842.50 b	810.33 a	5.87 ab	81.67 a
	HT-II	4 119.84 abc	3 014.17 ab	1 105.67 c	4 966.33 ab	846.50 a	5.94 ab	81.26 a
	ST-II	4 253.83 a	3 131.17 a	1 122.67 bc	5 039.17 a	785.33 a	5.97 ab	81.53 a
	MT-II	4 202.50 ab	2 885.17 ab	1 317.33 ab	4 839.83 b	637.33 b	5.83 ab	81.50 a
	DS-II	3 968.17 c	2 817.50 b	1 150.67 abc	4 807.83 b	839.67 a	5.87 ab	81.82 a
晚稻	HT-FI	3 128.17 c	1 701.67 ab	1 426.50 cd	2 871.00 a	-257.17 bc	6.08 a	82.29 a
Late	ST-FI	3 324.50 ab	1 712.00 ab	1 612.50 ab	2 865.83 a	-458.67 de	5.98 ab	82.33 a
rice	MT-FI	3 283.33 abc	1 757.50 a	1 525.83 abc	2 937.17 a	-346.17 cde	6.05 ab	82.60 a
	DS-FI	2 932.50 d	1 634.33 b	1 298.17 de	2 817.00 ab	-115.50 b	6.00 ab	79.38 b
	HT-II	3 171.50 bc	1 689.17 ab	1 482.33 bc	2 850.67 a	-320.83 cd	5.99 ab	82.18 a
	ST-II	3 351.17 a	1 677.67 ab	1 673.50 a	2 837.17 a	-514.00 e	5.92 b	81.89 a
	MT-II	3 221.50 abc	1 672.00 ab	1 549.50 abc	2 828.50 ab	-393.00 cde	6.00 ab	82.32 a
	DS-II	2 697.17 e	1 505.00 c	1 192.17 e	2 685.33 b	-11.83 a	6.00 ab	78.55 c

[1]	李灿, 杨婷, 孙乙铭, 陈洪梁, 崔琦, 沈晓霞. 华东覆盆子优势种质资源的筛选与评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(2): 349-364.
[2]	李建强, 魏倩倩, 刘晓霞, 张均华, 朱春权. 优化施肥措施对水稻产量和土壤养分平衡的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(2): 438-446.
[3]	韩笑, 刘旭杰, 石吕, 张晋, 单海勇, 石晓旭, 严旖旎, 刘建, 薛亚光. 麦秸行间集覆还田下控释氮肥减施对水稻产量、品质与氮肥利用率的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(1): 1-13.
[4]	李腾飞, 杨桂玲, 阮美颖, 褚田芬, 秦华, 邓美华. 不同肥药管理对设施番茄生产系统土壤健康与番茄性状的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(1): 145-158.
[5]	陈宇眺, 闫川, 洪晓富, 宋佳谕. 分蘖期淹水对常规粳稻生长特性、产量形成与钾素吸收的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(9): 1990-1999.
[6]	闵江艳, 唐卓磊, 杨雪, 黄小燕, 黄凯丰, 何佩云. 不同干旱-复水模式对苦荞生长与产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(9): 2000-2009.
[7]	潘志军, 吴小文, 吴晨阳, 程驭, 陈龙, 张晓红, 张进山, 周兵, 江波, 张文静, 车钊, 宋贺. 皖中不同类型再生稻品种产量与温光资源利用特征分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(7): 1492-1501.
[8]	李慧, 谭晓琴, 唐茜, 杨洋, 陈玮. 疏花对紫嫣茶树产量及品质成分的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(7): 1602-1615.
[9]	胡铁军. 化肥减量配施微生物肥对西蓝花产量品质与土壤性质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(7): 1657-1665.
[10]	许立婷, 齐广平, 康燕霞, 银敏华, 马彦麟, 贾琼, 汪精海, 姜渊博. 调亏灌溉对苜蓿产量品质效应的荟萃分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(6): 1256-1269.
[11]	熊瑞, 欧阳宁, 欧茜, 钟康裕, 周文涛, 王泓睿, 龙攀, 徐莹, 傅志强. 秸秆还田与耕作方式对双季稻土壤团聚体及碳氮含量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(6): 1347-1356.
[12]	赵黎明, 王亚新, 蒋文鑫, 段绍彪, 沈雪峰, 郑殿峰, 冯乃杰. 植物生长调节剂对优质粳稻产量、品质与光合特性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(5): 1003-1014.
[13]	高虎, 穆晓国, 李海俊, 高富成, 张莹, 李建设, 叶林. 粉垄耕作对坝地土壤特性及甘蓝产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(5): 1113-1123.
[14]	陈俊霖, 蒋娜, 刘鑫, 卓红, 田昌, 韩永亮, 张玉平, 荣湘民. 控释氮肥减量对作物产量、氮素吸收与径流损失的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(4): 846-858.
[15]	张永彬, 李想, 满卫东, 刘明月, 樊继好, 胡皓然, 宋利杰, 刘玮佳. 融合Sentinel-1/2数据和机器学习算法的冬小麦产量估算方法研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(12): 2812-2822.

处理 Treatment	直链淀粉含量Amylose content/%		胶稠度Gel consistency/mm		碱消值Alkali spreading value
处理 Treatment	早稻Early rice	晚稻Late rice	早稻Early rice	晚稻Late rice	早稻Early rice	晚稻Late rice
HT-FI	28.72±4.15 ab	20.97±1.84 ab	66.50±1.80 a	59.67±2.02 ab	6	7
ST-FI	30.51±0.32 ab	19.32±1.26 b	63.33±4.04 a	64.00±1.73 a	6	7
MT-FI	29.96±1.55 ab	18.58±1.28 b	70.50±5.22 a	64.33±1.89 a	6	7
DS-FI	26.57±1.31 b	24.19±3.12 a	68.00±4.27 a	57.83±5.58 b	6	7
HT-II	29.77±1.47 ab	20.48±0.38 ab	68.83±3.69 a	61.83±3.82 ab	6	7
ST-II	30.74±1.62 ab	20.96±2.44 ab	63.33±5.03 a	62.67±1.26 ab	6	7
MT-II	31.19±1.35 a	21.05±0.53 ab	71.00±2.00 a	60.83±2.36 ab	6	7
DS-II	28.84±0.67 ab	22.28±1.71 ab	69.50±5.41 a	56.67±2.36 b	6	7

处理 Treatment	直链淀粉含量Amylose content/%		胶稠度Gel consistency/mm		碱消值Alkali spreading value
处理 Treatment	早稻Early rice	晚稻Late rice	早稻Early rice	晚稻Late rice	早稻Early rice	晚稻Late rice
HT-FI	28.72±4.15 ab	20.97±1.84 ab	66.50±1.80 a	59.67±2.02 ab	6	7
ST-FI	30.51±0.32 ab	19.32±1.26 b	63.33±4.04 a	64.00±1.73 a	6	7
MT-FI	29.96±1.55 ab	18.58±1.28 b	70.50±5.22 a	64.33±1.89 a	6	7
DS-FI	26.57±1.31 b	24.19±3.12 a	68.00±4.27 a	57.83±5.58 b	6	7
HT-II	29.77±1.47 ab	20.48±0.38 ab	68.83±3.69 a	61.83±3.82 ab	6	7
ST-II	30.74±1.62 ab	20.96±2.44 ab	63.33±5.03 a	62.67±1.26 ab	6	7
MT-II	31.19±1.35 a	21.05±0.53 ab	71.00±2.00 a	60.83±2.36 ab	6	7
DS-II	28.84±0.67 ab	22.28±1.71 ab	69.50±5.41 a	56.67±2.36 b	6	7