Comprehensive evaluation of waterlogging tolerance of 18 wheat varieties at jointing stage

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2023.06.01

Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis ›› 2023, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (6): 1235-1242.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2023.06.01

• Crop Science • Previous Articles Next Articles

Comprehensive evaluation of waterlogging tolerance of 18 wheat varieties at jointing stage

YU Guihong(), SONG Guicheng, ZHANG Peng, WANG Huadun, FAN Xiangyun

Institute of Food Crops, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China

Received:2022-07-22 Online:2023-06-25 Published:2023-07-04

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to explore the waterlogging tolerance of wheat at jointing stage, the waterlogging tolerance of 18 wheat varieties (lines) were identified and evaluated by pot cultivation waterlogging method. The results showed that the sensitivity of 11 wheat traits to waterlogging stress during jointing stage was as follows: yield per plant>number of effective panicle>number of green leaves per main shoot>number of tillers>leaf length>chlorophyll content>total weight of main spike>1 000-grain weight>plant height>length of main spike>spikelet number per main spike. The 11 investigated traits were transformed into 4 comprehensive indexes by using principal component analysis, and the cumulative contribution rate of the 4 comprehensive indexes was 82.66%. The membership function value of the 4 comprehensive indexes calculated, the comprehensive evaluation values (D) of waterlogging resistance of 18 varieties were distributed between 0.14-0.78 with average value 0.55 and coefficient of variation 25.40%. Through cluster analysis by using K-means method, 18 varieties were divided into 5 categories: high resistance (1 variety), resistance (6 varieties), moderate resistance (5 varieties), sensitivity (5 varieties) and high sensitivity (1 variety). There were 7 varieties including Ningmai23, Ningmai21, Emai803, Huamai18P10, Ningmai13, Ning1710 and Luomai163 whose waterlogging tolerance reached the level of resistance or above. The D value of waterlogging tolerance had significant positive correlation with the waterlogging tolerance coefficient of 5 traits including yield per plant, chlorophyll content, plant height, total weight of main spike and number of green leaves per main shoot at P<0.01 level.

Key words: wheat, waterlogging tolerance, jointing stage, waterlogging tolerance coefficient

CLC Number:

S512.1

YU Guihong, SONG Guicheng, ZHANG Peng, WANG Huadun, FAN Xiangyun. Comprehensive evaluation of waterlogging tolerance of 18 wheat varieties at jointing stage[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(6): 1235-1242.

Figures/Tables 6

References 22

[1]	XU Z Y, SHEN Q F, ZHANG G P. The mechanisms for the difference in waterlogging tolerance among sea barley, wheat and barley[J]. Plant Growth Regulation, 2022, 96(3): 431-441.
[2]	吴洪颜, 张佩, 徐敏, 等. 长江中下游地区冬小麦春季涝渍害灾损风险时空分布特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(5): 1152-1158.
	WU H Y, ZHANG P, XU M, et al. Spatial-temporal variations of the risk of winter wheat loss suffered from spring waterlogging disaster in the middle and Lower Yangtze River Reaches[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2018, 27(5): 1152-1158. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]	任菲莹, 熊勤学. 基于分布式水文模型的小麦渍害对气候变化响应研究[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2020, 40(10): 1265-1274.
	REN F Y, XIONG Q X. Response of wheat sub-surface waterlogging to climate changing using DHSVM model simulations[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2020, 40(10): 1265-1274. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]	金之庆, 石春林. 江淮平原小麦渍害预警系统(WWWS)[J]. 作物学报, 2006, 32(10): 1458-1465.
	JIN Z Q, SHI C L. An early warning system to predict waterlogging injuries for winter wheat in the Yangtze-Huai Plain(WWWS)[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2006, 32(10): 1458-1465. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]	张淑贞, 朱建强, 杨威, 等. 江汉平原小麦湿害分析及其防控措施[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2011, 50(19): 3916-3920.
	ZHANG S Z, ZHU J Q, YANG W, et al. Wet injury of wheat and its prevention in Jianghan Plain[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2011, 50(19): 3916-3920. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]	罗干, 于学奎, 黄建华, 等. 江淮地区小麦渍(湿)害及防控措施[J]. 现代农业科技, 2019(12): 46-47.
	LUO G, YU X K, HUANG J H, et al. Waterlogging (wet) damage and prevention measures in wheat in Jianghuai area[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019(12): 46-47. (in Chinese)
[7]	宋桂成, 史高玲, 张平平, 等. 拔节期渍水对小麦籽粒品质相关性状的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2021, 35(1): 238-244.
	SONG G C, SHI G L, ZHANG P P, et al. Effect of jointing waterlogging on grain quality in wheat[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 35(1): 238-244. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	李金才, 董琦, 余松烈. 不同生育期根际土壤淹水对小麦品种光合作用和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2001, 27(4): 434-441.
	LI J C, DONG Q, YU S L. Effect of waterlogging at different growth stages on photosynthesis and yield of different wheat cultivars[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2001, 27(4): 434-441. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	吴元奇, 李朝苏, 樊高琼, 等. 渍水对四川小麦生理性状及产量的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26(4): 1162-1170.
	WU Y Q, LI C S, FAN G Q, et al. Effect of waterlogging on physical traits and yield of wheat in Sichuan, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2015, 26(4): 1162-1170. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]	林一波, 杨晓艳, 刘芬兰. 50个小麦品种耐湿性的初步鉴定[J]. 上海农业学报, 1994, 10(2): 79-84.
	LIN Y B, YANG X Y, LIU F L. A study on evaluation of waterlogging tolerance in wheat varieties (Triticum aestivum L.)[J]. Acta Agriculturae Shanghai, 1994, 10(2): 79-84. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]	佟汉文, 高春保, 邹娟, 等. 湖北稻茬小麦新品种(系)孕穗期耐渍性的鉴定与评价[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2016, 36(12): 1635-1642.
	TONG H W, GAO C B, ZOU J, et al. Evaluation of waterlogging tolerance of wheat varieties at booting stage in Hubei rice-wheat rotation system[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2016, 36(12): 1635-1642. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]	周广生, 周竹青, 朱旭彤. 用隶属函数法评价小麦的耐湿性[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2001, 21(4): 34-37.
	ZHOU G S, ZHOU Z Q, ZHU X T. Evaluation on the waterlogging resistance of wheat by subordinate function[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2001, 21(4): 34-37. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]	鲍晓鸣. 小麦耐湿性的鉴定时期及鉴定指标[J]. 上海农业学报, 1997, 13(2): 32-38.
	BAO X M. Study on identification stage and index of waterlogging tolerance in various wheat genotypes(Triticum aestivum L.)[J]. Acta Agriculturae Shanghai, 1997, 13(2): 32-38. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]	DE SAN CELEDONIO R P, ABELEDO L G, MIRALLES D J. Identifying the critical period for waterlogging on yield and its components in wheat and barley[J]. Plant Soil, 2014, 378(1): 265-277.
[15]	丁锦峰, 苏盛楠, 梁鹏, 等. 拔节期和花后渍水对小麦产量、干物质及氮素积累和转运的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2017, 37(11): 1473-1479.
	DING J F, SU S N, LIANG P, et al. Effect of waterlogging at elongation or after anthesis on grain yield and accumulation and remobilization of dry matter and nitrogen in wheat[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2017, 37(11): 1473-1479. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]	刘杨, 石春林, 刘晓宇, 等. 渍害胁迫时期和持续时间对冬小麦产量及其构成因素的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2018, 38(2): 239-245.
	LIU Y, SHI C L, LIU X Y, et al. Effect of waterlogging stress duration at different growth stages on yield and its components of winter wheat[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2018, 38(2): 239-245. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]	李梅芳, 褚瑶顺, 梁少川, 等. 小麦孕穗期湿害的主要性状及形态指标[J]. 湖北农业科学, 1995, 34(1): 18-21.
	LI M F, ZHU Y S, LIANG S C, et al. Main traits and morphological indexes of waterlogging at booting stage in wheat[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 1995, 34(1): 18-21. (in Chinese)
[18]	张婷婷, 于崧, 于立河, 等. 松嫩平原春小麦耐盐碱性鉴定及品种(系)筛选[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2016, 36(8): 1008-1019.
	ZHANG T T, YU S, YU L H, et al. Saline-alkaline tolerance identification and varieties (lines) screening of spring wheat in Songnen Plain[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2016, 36(8): 1008-1019. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]	马一鸣. 浙江省大麦品种资源耐湿性研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 1990, 2(4): 145-150.
	MA Y M. Study on wet-tolerance in barley germplasm resources of Zhejiang Province[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 1990, 2(4): 145-150. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]	SETTER T L, WATERS I. Review of prospects for germplasm improvement for waterlogging tolerance in wheat, barley and oats[J]. Plant and Soil, 2003, 253(1): 1-34.
[21]	赵旭, 王林权, 周春菊, 等. 盐胁迫对不同基因型冬小麦发芽和出苗的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2005, 23(4): 108-112.
	ZHAO X, WANG L Q, ZHOU C J, et al. Effects of salt stress on germination and emergence of different winter wheat genotypes[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2005, 23(4): 108-112. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[22]	魏凤珍, 李金才, 董琦. 孕穗期至抽穗期湿害对耐湿性不同品种冬小麦光合特性的影响(简报)[J]. 植物生理学通讯, 2000, 36(2): 119-122.
	WEI F Z, LI J C, DONG Q. Effects of wet damage on photosynthetic characteristics of winter wheat varieties with different Waterlogging tolerance from booting stage to heading stage (brief report)[J]. Plant Physiology Communications, 2000, 36(2): 119-122. (in Chinese)

品种(系)	LL	NGLMS	NT	CC	PH	EP	SNMS	LMS	TWMS	TGW	YP
Variety (line)
宁1710 Ning 1710	0.77	0.83	0.72	0.86	0.88	0.78	0.97	0.96	1.15	1.01	0.72
华麦18P10 Huamai 18P10	0.75	0.78	0.86	0.90	0.91	0.62	0.97	0.90	0.93	1.07	0.71
襄麦1501 Xiangmai 1501	0.74	0.83	0.84	0.88	0.95	0.69	0.98	0.98	0.91	0.90	0.71
信麦239 Xinmai 239	0.81	0.83	0.77	0.91	0.90	0.65	0.91	0.82	0.62	1.06	0.52
信麦179 Xinmai 179	0.78	0.68	0.75	0.92	0.94	0.87	1.00	0.95	0.88	0.83	0.69
鄂麦803 Emai 803	0.84	0.83	0.76	0.94	1.00	0.77	0.99	0.92	0.86	1.00	0.69
鄂麦605 Emai 605	0.77	0.76	0.84	0.86	0.92	0.88	0.97	0.93	0.74	0.90	0.60
鄂711367 E 711367	0.81	0.71	0.74	0.87	0.95	0.64	1.02	1.03	1.01	0.86	0.69
漯麦163 Luomai 163	0.78	0.79	0.86	0.92	1.01	0.72	0.97	0.95	0.91	0.88	0.78
长麦5号Changmai 5	0.80	0.77	0.76	0.93	0.95	0.82	0.97	0.95	0.95	0.89	0.66
兆丰36 Zhaofeng 36	0.79	0.67	0.75	0.95	1.00	0.81	0.97	0.94	0.95	0.90	0.79
扬18528 Yang 18528	0.74	0.76	0.75	0.88	0.94	0.83	1.00	0.92	0.87	0.88	0.70
扬麦20 Yangmai 20	0.79	0.71	0.64	0.90	0.89	0.74	0.99	0.92	0.76	0.88	0.72
扬麦25 Yangmai 20	0.75	0.59	0.67	0.77	0.78	0.44	0.92	0.88	0.71	0.95	0.43
郑麦1354 Zhenmai 1354	0.80	0.65	0.62	0.90	0.91	0.64	1.02	0.95	1.01	0.96	0.79
宁麦21 Ningmai 21	0.79	0.76	0.86	0.93	0.92	0.79	0.99	0.90	0.94	0.96	0.91
宁麦23 Ningmai 23	0.83	0.75	0.75	0.95	0.99	0.78	1.00	1.00	1.19	0.96	0.91
宁麦13 Ningmai 13	0.88	0.77	0.76	0.91	0.96	0.91	0.99	0.98	1.03	0.89	0.77

品种(系)	LL	NGLMS	NT	CC	PH	EP	SNMS	LMS	TWMS	TGW	YP
Variety (line)
宁1710 Ning 1710	0.77	0.83	0.72	0.86	0.88	0.78	0.97	0.96	1.15	1.01	0.72
华麦18P10 Huamai 18P10	0.75	0.78	0.86	0.90	0.91	0.62	0.97	0.90	0.93	1.07	0.71
襄麦1501 Xiangmai 1501	0.74	0.83	0.84	0.88	0.95	0.69	0.98	0.98	0.91	0.90	0.71
信麦239 Xinmai 239	0.81	0.83	0.77	0.91	0.90	0.65	0.91	0.82	0.62	1.06	0.52
信麦179 Xinmai 179	0.78	0.68	0.75	0.92	0.94	0.87	1.00	0.95	0.88	0.83	0.69
鄂麦803 Emai 803	0.84	0.83	0.76	0.94	1.00	0.77	0.99	0.92	0.86	1.00	0.69
鄂麦605 Emai 605	0.77	0.76	0.84	0.86	0.92	0.88	0.97	0.93	0.74	0.90	0.60
鄂711367 E 711367	0.81	0.71	0.74	0.87	0.95	0.64	1.02	1.03	1.01	0.86	0.69
漯麦163 Luomai 163	0.78	0.79	0.86	0.92	1.01	0.72	0.97	0.95	0.91	0.88	0.78
长麦5号Changmai 5	0.80	0.77	0.76	0.93	0.95	0.82	0.97	0.95	0.95	0.89	0.66
兆丰36 Zhaofeng 36	0.79	0.67	0.75	0.95	1.00	0.81	0.97	0.94	0.95	0.90	0.79
扬18528 Yang 18528	0.74	0.76	0.75	0.88	0.94	0.83	1.00	0.92	0.87	0.88	0.70
扬麦20 Yangmai 20	0.79	0.71	0.64	0.90	0.89	0.74	0.99	0.92	0.76	0.88	0.72
扬麦25 Yangmai 20	0.75	0.59	0.67	0.77	0.78	0.44	0.92	0.88	0.71	0.95	0.43
郑麦1354 Zhenmai 1354	0.80	0.65	0.62	0.90	0.91	0.64	1.02	0.95	1.01	0.96	0.79
宁麦21 Ningmai 21	0.79	0.76	0.86	0.93	0.92	0.79	0.99	0.90	0.94	0.96	0.91
宁麦23 Ningmai 23	0.83	0.75	0.75	0.95	0.99	0.78	1.00	1.00	1.19	0.96	0.91
宁麦13 Ningmai 13	0.88	0.77	0.76	0.91	0.96	0.91	0.99	0.98	1.03	0.89	0.77

结果	LL	NGLMS	NT	CC	PH	EP	SNMS	LMS	TWMS	TGW	YP
Result
平均值Mean	0.790	0.748	0.761	0.899	0.933	0.743	0.979	0.938	0.912	0.932	0.711
最大值Max	0.880	0.830	0.860	0.950	1.010	0.910	1.020	1.030	1.190	1.070	0.910
最小值Min	0.740	0.590	0.620	0.770	0.780	0.440	0.910	0.820	0.620	0.830	0.430
标准差Standard deviation	0.036	0.068	0.072	0.043	0.054	0.115	0.029	0.047	0.145	0.068	0.117
变异系数CV/%	4.6	9.1	9.4	4.8	5.8	15.5	2.9	5.0	15.8	7.3	16.4

结果	LL	NGLMS	NT	CC	PH	EP	SNMS	LMS	TWMS	TGW	YP
Result
平均值Mean	0.790	0.748	0.761	0.899	0.933	0.743	0.979	0.938	0.912	0.932	0.711
最大值Max	0.880	0.830	0.860	0.950	1.010	0.910	1.020	1.030	1.190	1.070	0.910
最小值Min	0.740	0.590	0.620	0.770	0.780	0.440	0.910	0.820	0.620	0.830	0.430
标准差Standard deviation	0.036	0.068	0.072	0.043	0.054	0.115	0.029	0.047	0.145	0.068	0.117
变异系数CV/%	4.6	9.1	9.4	4.8	5.8	15.5	2.9	5.0	15.8	7.3	16.4

指标Index	LL	NGLMS	NT	CC	PH	EP	SNMS	LMS	TWMS	TGW
NGLMS	0.119
NT	-0.172	0.580^**
CC	0.499^*	0.343	0.253
PH	0.417^*	0.394	0.401^*	0.811^**
EP	0.344	0.337	0.251	0.567^**	0.577^**
SNMS	0.227	-0.094	-0.137	0.360	0.466^*	0.394
LMS	0.246	-0.034	-0.043	0.150	0.469^*	0.300	0.725^**
TWMS	0.282	0.101	-0.021	0.331	0.399	0.280	0.602^**	0.755^**
TGW	0.007	0.356	0.098	-0.009	-0.275	-0.403^*	-0.449^*	-0.545^*	-0.048
YP	0.301	0.148	0.187	0.689^**	0.612^**	0.455^*	0.677^**	0.497^*	0.728^**	-0.119

Comprehensive evaluation of waterlogging tolerance of 18 wheat varieties at jointing stage

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 6

References 22

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

项目 Item	综合指标 Comprehensive index
项目 Item	F₁	F₂	F₃	F₄
特征值Eigenvalue	4.56	2.22	1.22	1.10
贡献率Contribution rate/%	41.42	20.20	11.07	9.97
累积贡献率	41.42	61.62	72.69	82.66
Cumulative contribution rate/%
权重Weight	0.50	0.24	0.13	0.12

品种(系) Variety (line)	综合指标Comprehensive index				隶属函数值Membership function value
品种(系) Variety (line)	F₁	F₂	F₃	F₄	μ₁	μ₂	μ₃	μ₄
宁1710 Ning 1710	-0.09	0.03	0.85	1.72	0.65	0.43	0.76	0.98
华麦18P10 Huamai 18P10	-0.58	1.17	0.50	1.78	0.54	0.74	0.66	1.00
襄麦1501 Xiangmai 1501	0.06	0.34	-1.39	1.51	0.68	0.52	0.11	0.91
信麦239 Xinmai 239	-1.61	2.13	1.00	-1.30	0.30	1.00	0.81	0
信麦179 Xinmai 179	0.38	-0.77	-1.17	-1.01	0.75	0.22	0.17	0.10
鄂麦803 Emai 803	0.48	1.10	0.95	-0.88	0.78	0.72	0.79	0.14
鄂麦605 Emai 605	-0.42	0.42	-1.75	-0.41	0.57	0.54	0.00	0.29
鄂711367 E 711367	0.51	-1.51	-0.17	0.57	0.78	0.02	0.46	0.61
漯麦163 Luomai 163	0.54	0.72	-1.05	0.32	0.79	0.62	0.21	0.53
长麦5号Changmai 5	0.32	0.17	-0.33	-0.63	0.74	0.47	0.42	0.22
兆丰36 Zhaofeng 36	0.59	-0.12	-0.10	-0.82	0.80	0.39	0.49	0.16
扬18528 Yang 18528	-0.03	-0.25	-1.29	0.13	0.66	0.36	0.14	0.46
扬麦20 Yangmai 20	-0.35	-0.90	0.13	-1.20	0.59	0.18	0.55	0.03
扬麦25 Yangmai 20	-2.96	-1.46	0.22	0.13	0	0.03	0.58	0.47
郑麦1354 Zhenmai 1354	0.12	-1.57	1.65	0.12	0.69	0	1.00	0.46
宁麦21 Ningmai 21	0.46	0.81	0.09	0.52	0.77	0.64	0.54	0.59
宁麦23 Ningmai 23	1.47	-0.19	1.33	0.59	1.00	0.37	0.91	0.61
宁麦13 Ningmai 13	1.11	-0.12	0.54	-1.16	0.92	0.39	0.67	0.05

品种(系) Variety(line)	D	排名 Rank	耐渍性分级 Grade	品种 Variety	D	排名 Rank	耐渍性分级 Grade
宁麦23 Ningmai 23	0.78	1	HT	长麦5号Changmai5	0.56	10	M
宁麦21 Ningmai 21	0.68	2	T	郑麦1354 Zhenmai1354	0.53	11	M
鄂麦803 Emai 803	0.68	3	T	鄂711367 E711367	0.53	12	M
华麦18P10 Huamai 18P10	0.65	4	T	信麦239 Xinmai239	0.50	13	S
宁麦13 Ningmai 13	0.65	5	T	扬18528 Yang18528	0.49	14	S
宁1710 Ning 1710	0.64	6	T	信麦179 Xinmai179	0.46	15	S
漯麦163 Luomai 163	0.63	7	T	鄂麦605 Emai605	0.45	16	S
襄麦1501 Xiangmai 1501	0.59	8	M	扬麦20 Yangmai20	0.41	17	S
兆丰36 Zhaofeng 36	0.58	9	M	扬麦25 Yangmai25	0.14	18	HS

[1]	ZHANG Jun, ZHANG Bo, HU Bibo, LIU Jingliang, ZHANG Xiaoyu, LI Chunyang, XIONG Shengting, GUO Binbin, WANG Xiucun, MA Chao. Identification and expression analysis of members of the SWEET and SUT families in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(9): 1825-1839.
[2]	LIU Shengnan, ZHU Jianyi, LI Ming, ZHAO Haoyu, XIONG Tao, TANG Yonglu, ZHOU Xiaogang, LI Chaosu. Weed control efficacy and wheat yield in no-tillage rotary sowing after rice stubble [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(10): 2129-2137.
[3]	HAN Xiao, LIU Xujie, SHI Lyu, ZHANG Jin, SHAN Haiyong, SHI Xiaoxu, YAN Yini, LIU Jian, XUE Yaguang. Effects of reduced application of controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer on rice yield, quality and nitrogen fertilizer utilization efficiency under concentrated coverage of wheat straw between rows for returning to field [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(1): 1-13.
[4]	YANG Xiaoyu, MA Zhihui, WEI Qing, NIU Zhipeng, CHEN Anqi, HU Zhengchong, WANG Linsheng. Preliminary mapping of a wheat awn length gene and prediction of candidate genes [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(1): 14-23.
[5]	MIN Jiangyan, TANG Zhuolei, YANG Xue, HUANG Xiaoyan, HUANG Kaifeng, HE Peiyun. Effect of different drought-rewatering modes on growth and yield of Tartary buckwheat [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(9): 2000-2009.
[6]	SHEN Zhengrong, DAI Yuanxing, GUO Liuming, WANG Zhiyao, ZHANG Hengmu. Preparation and application of specific antibody against coat protein (CP) of Chinese wheat mosaic virus (CWMV) [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(9): 2042-2050.
[7]	QI Xueli, LI Ying, DUAN Junzhi. Application of salt tolerance genes in wheat salt tolerance genetic engineering [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(6): 1447-1457.
[8]	LI Jingjing, LI Chuang, LU Yanan, ZHENG Wenming. Identification and expression analysis of Thionin-like gene family in wheat [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(4): 729-737.
[9]	XUE Xianbin, JIA Qiong, CHEN Zhengfeng, LI Ruiyuan, CHEN Qingfu, SHI Taoxiong. Comprehensive evaluation of agronomic characteristics of recombinant inbred lines of Tartary buckwheat based on principal component analysis [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(4): 748-759.
[10]	ZHANG Yongbin, LI Xiang, MAN Weidong, LIU Mingyue, FAN Jihao, HU Haoran, SONG Lijie, LIU Weijia. Research on yield estimation method of winter wheat based on Sentinel-1/2 data and machine learning algorithms [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(12): 2812-2822.
[11]	LIU Yongan, HUANG Yechang, YUE Gaohong, GAO Xiteng, DENG Lizhang, PAN Binrong. Proteomic analysis of grain of high-quality wheat variety Wenmai 10 [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(11): 2437-2446.
[12]	LOU Yuangen, LI Chuang, LI Jingjing, XING Guozhen, LU Yanan, ZHENG Wenming. Identification and analysis of HP gene family in wheat [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(9): 2023-2032.
[13]	WANG Di, YANG Hanmei, LI Yangqian, JIA Mengting, ZOU Liang, YANG Fan. Multidimensional evaluation of “variety, quality, efficiency and application” of Tartary buckwheat and research progress of high-value utilization of active ingredients [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(8): 1960-1974.
[14]	YANG Kai, CHEN Kai, LI Hongmei, ZHAO Zhongjuan, HU Jindong, LI Jishun, YANG Hetong. Biocontrol efficacy and action mechanism of Trichoderma harzianum LTR-2 and Arthrobacter ureafaciens DnL1-1 against crown rot of wheat [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(6): 1385-1395.
[15]	REN Kaiming, WANG Ben, YANG Wenjun, FAN Yonghui, ZHANG Wenjing, MA Shangyu, HUANG Zhenglai. Effects of nitrogen on physiological growth, quality and yield of weak gluten wheat after rice stubble [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(4): 769-779.