柯杈肥与功能肥复配对杂交稻生长与产量的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20231125

浙江农业学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (11): 2447-2455.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20231125

柯杈肥与功能肥复配对杂交稻生长与产量的影响

廖雪环(), 张坷塬, 阿尔力色, 周林, 杨尔倮, 邓俊, 张荣萍()

西南科技大学生命科学与工程学院,四川绵阳 621010

收稿日期:2023-09-19 出版日期:2024-11-25 发布日期:2024-11-27
作者简介:廖雪环(2000—),女,四川遂宁人,硕士研究生,主要从事作物栽培方面的研究。E-mail:lxh000818@163.com
通讯作者: *张荣萍,E-mail:zhzhrrpp@163.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(2023YFD2301903);中央引导地方科技发展项目(2022ZYDF039);四川省科技成果转移转化示范项目(2022ZHCG0106)

Effects of branch fertilizer and functional fertilizer on growth and yield of hybrid rice

LIAO Xuehuan(), ZHANG Keyuan, AER Lise, ZHOU Lin, YANG Erluo, DENG Jun, ZHANG Rongping()

School of Life Science and Engineering, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang 621010, Sichuan, China

Received:2023-09-19 Online:2024-11-25 Published:2024-11-27

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为探明柯杈肥与功能肥对杂交稻生长发育及产量的影响,开展裂-裂区试验,其中,主区为普通复合肥(F1)和柯杈肥(F2);裂副区为喷清水(P1)和喷植物生长调节剂(即功能肥)(P2);再裂区为6个杂交稻品种。结果表明:柯杈肥与功能肥复配使用能有效促进分蘖早生快发和叶面积指数增加。在6个品种中,隆两优1813在F2P2处理下的产量最高,达12 512.04 kg·hm^-2。对6个品种来说,均以F2P2处理的产量最高,且显著(P<0.05)高于F1P1处理,增产幅度在30.02%~70.48%。总的来看,柯杈肥与功能肥复配使用通过提高各品种的有效穗数、结实率、千粒重有效促进了水稻产量的提升。

关键词: 杂交稻, 柯杈肥, 植物生长调节剂, 生长发育, 产量

Abstract:

To investigate the effects of branch fertilizer and functional fertilizer on the growth, development and yield of hybrid rice, the split-split plot design was used in the experiment. The main plots were common compound fertilizer (F1) and branch fertilizer (F2). The split area was divided as spraying water (P1) and spraying plant growth regulator (functional fertilizer) (P2). The re-splitting area was 6 hybrid rice varieties. The results showed that the co-application of branch fertilizer and functional fertilizer could effectively promote the early growth and tillering and increase the leaf area index. Among the 6 varieties, Longliangyou1813 exhibited the highest yield (12 512.04 kg·hm^-2) under the F2P2 treatment. For all the 6 varieties, the highest yield was all found under the F2P2 treatment, which was significantly (P<0.05) higher than that under the F1P1 treatment by 30.02%-70.48%. In general, the co-application of branch fertilizer and functional fertilizer enhanced the rice yiled by increasing the effective panicle number, seed setting rate and 1 000-grain weight.

Key words: hybrid rice, branch fertilizer, plant growth regulator, growth and development, yield

中图分类号:

廖雪环, 张坷塬, 阿尔力色, 周林, 杨尔倮, 邓俊, 张荣萍. 柯杈肥与功能肥复配对杂交稻生长与产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(11): 2447-2455.

LIAO Xuehuan, ZHANG Keyuan, AER Lise, ZHOU Lin, YANG Erluo, DENG Jun, ZHANG Rongping. Effects of branch fertilizer and functional fertilizer on growth and yield of hybrid rice[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(11): 2447-2455.

图/表 5

参考文献 29

[1]	赵秉强. 传统化肥增效改性提升产品性能与功能[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2016, 22(1): 1-7.
	ZHAO B Q. Modification of conventional fertilizers for enhanced property and function[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2016, 22(1): 1-7. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]	许祥富, 林明义. 我国新型肥料的研究现状及在水稻上的应用进展[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2021, 49(7): 17-19.
	XU X F, LIN M Y. Research status of new fertilizer in China and its application in rice[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 49(7): 17-19. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]	李平远, 沈兵, 裴友良, 等. 超高产水稻专用复合肥肥效试验[J]. 磷肥与复肥, 2011, 26(1): 68-69.
	LI P Y, SHEN B, PEI Y L, et al. Fertilizer effect test of specialty fertilizer for super-high-yielding rice[J]. Phosphate & Compound Fertilizer, 2011, 26(1): 68-69. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]	冯恩位. 不同水稻专用新型肥料减肥增效对比效果分析[J]. 农业技术与装备, 2022(3): 7-9.
	FENG E W. Analysis on the comparative effects of different new special fertilizers for rice on weight loss and efficiency[J]. Agricultural Technology & Equipment, 2022(3): 7-9. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]	伍龙梅, 李惠芬, 张彬, 等. 中微量元素肥料对超级杂交籼稻株型和干物质积累的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(28): 1-6.
	WU L M, LI H F, ZHANG B, et al. Medium and microelements fertilizer: effects on plant type and dry matter accumulation of super hybrid indica rice(Oryza sativa L.)[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2019, 35(28): 1-6. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]	卢俊, 陈锦珠, 朱孔志, 等. 不同新型高效肥料在苏北地区水稻上的应用效果研究[J]. 现代农业科技, 2020(7): 10-11.
	LU J, CHEN J Z, ZHU K Z, et al. Application effect of different new high-efficiency fertilizers on rice in northern Jiangsu Province[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020(7): 10-11. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]	袁亚莉. 黑道白道生物返青肥在寒地水稻上应用效果[J]. 现代化农业, 2010(11): 10.
	YUAN Y L. Application effect of biofertilizer on rice in cold area[J]. Modernizing Agriculture, 2010(11): 10. (in Chinese)
[8]	易靖, 隗华军, 刘伟, 等. 分蘖肥施用时期对水稻机插秧群体及产量的影响[J]. 南方农业, 2021, 15(16): 43-45.
	YI J, KUI H J, LIU W, et al. Effect of tillering fertilizer application period on population and yield of machine-transplanted rice seedling[J]. South China Agriculture, 2021, 15(16): 43-45. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	王文华. 吡唑醚菌酯+芸苔素内酯+叶面肥“高产套餐” 混配施用技术[J]. 河南农业, 2021(22): 18.
	WANG W H. Application technology of pyraclostrobin+brassinolide+foliar fertilizer[J]. Agriculture of Henan, 2021(22): 18. (in Chinese)
[10]	骆琴, 周宇杰, 何信富. 芸苔素内酯与吡唑醚菌酯对水稻抗病性及产量的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2020, 26(1): 72-74.
	LUO Q, ZHOU Y J, HE X F. Effects of brassinolide and pyrazole ethermycin on disease resistance and quality of rice[J]. China Rice, 2020, 26(1): 72-74. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]	殷敏, 丁颖, 庄东英, 等. 不同植物生长调节剂复配对水稻产量性状的影响[J]. 现代农业科技, 2023(5): 5-8.
	YIN M, DING Y, ZHUANG D Y, et al. Effects of different plant growth regulator groups on rice yield traits[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023(5): 5-8. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]	吴挺. 胺鲜酯·芸苔素内酯对水稻生长及产量的影响[J]. 上海农业科技, 2019(4): 48-49.
	WU T. Effects of brassinolide on rice growth and yield[J]. Shanghai Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019(4): 48-49. (in Chinese)
[13]	赵黎明, 李明, 冯乃杰, 等. 植物生长调节剂对寒地水稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2015, 31(3): 43-48.
	ZHAO L M, LI M, FENG N J, et al. Effect of plant growth regulators on yield and quality of rice in the cold region[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2015, 31(3): 43-48. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]	褚世海, 李林, 朱文达. 0.01%芸苔素内酯水剂对水稻生长、产量和品质的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2016, 55(24): 6445-6448.
	CHU S H, LI L, ZHU W D. Effect of 0.01% brassinolide AS on the growth, yield and quality of rice[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 55(24): 6445-6448. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]	吴玉成, 王勇, 吴志青, 等. 芸苔素内酯对水稻生长的调节作用研究[J]. 生物灾害科学, 2015, 38(3): 228-230.
	WU Y C, WANG Y, WU Z Q, et al. Regulating effect of 0.1% brassinolide soluble powder on rice[J]. Biological Disaster Science, 2015, 38(3): 228-230. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]	徐建林, 宋金华, 张夕林, 等. 芸苔素内酯水溶液调节水稻生长试验[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2006, 12(2): 40-41.
	XU J L, SONG J H, ZHANG X L, et al. Regulation of rice growth by brassinolide solution[J]. Anhui Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2006, 12(2): 40-41. (in Chinese)
[17]	孙淑琴, 杨秀荣, 李月娇. 0.007 5%高芸苔素内酯可溶液剂在水稻上的应用效果研究[J]. 现代农业科技, 2021(13): 108-109.
	SUN S Q, YANG X R, LI Y J. Study on the application effect of 0.007 5% 28-homobrassinolide SL on rice[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021(13): 108-109. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]	顾俊荣, 董明辉, 杨代凤, 等. 一种新型水稻生长调节剂对超级稻籽粒结实与品质特性的影响[J]. 江西农业学报, 2017, 29(12): 8-13.
	GU J R, DONG M H, YANG D F, et al. Effects of a kind of new-type rice growth regulator on grain setting traits and quality of super rice[J]. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi, 2017, 29(12): 8-13. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]	刘伟, 郑建国, 王兆燕. 植物生长调节剂与肥料复配的研究与应用[J]. 磷肥与复肥, 2015, 30(3): 28-29.
	LIU W, ZHENG J G, WANG Z Y. Research and application of compounding of plant growth regulator and fertilizer[J]. Phosphate & Compound Fertilizer, 2015, 30(3): 28-29. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]	张姿, 于海燕, 李威, 等. 大量元素水溶肥和植物生长调节剂GGR 6号配施对辣椒农艺性状的影响[J]. 中国瓜菜, 2023, 36(9): 54-59.
	ZHANG Z, YU H Y, LI W, et al. Effects of macronutrient water soluble fertilizer and plant growth regulator GGR 6 combination on agronomic characters of pepper[J]. China Cucurbits and Vegetables, 2023, 36(9): 54-59. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]	胡鹏. 4种新型肥料对水稻生长影响效果的研究[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2019, 25(15): 90-92.
	HU P. Study on effects of four new fertilizers on rice growth[J]. Anhui Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2019, 25(15): 90-92. (in Chinese)
[22]	吴文革, 习敏, 李红春, 等. 不同水稻专用新型肥料减肥增效对比研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2019, 47(2): 135-137.
	WU W G, XI M, LI H C, et al. Comparative study on the effects of fertilizer reduction with efficiency increase by appling different rice-specific new type fertilizers[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 47(2): 135-137. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]	聂俊, 史亮亮, 邱俊荣, 等. 有机肥和化肥配施对抛栽水稻群体干物质生产和产量的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2016, 29(3): 579-583.
	NIE J, SHI L L, QIU J R, et al. Effects of organic manure application combined with chemical fertilizers on dry matter production and yield of rice[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 29(3): 579-583. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24]	唐乐丹. 新型专用肥料对水稻生长发育、产量及抗倒性的影响[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2019.
	TANG L D. Effects of new special fertilizer on growth development, yield and lodging resistance of rice[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2019. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25]	郑乐娅, 吴文革, 阎川, 等. 植物生长调节剂对水稻光合速率和产量构成因素的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2011(3): 63-66.
	ZHENG L Y, WU W G, YAN C, et al. Effects of plant growth regulators on photosynthetic rate and yield components of rice[J]. Crops, 2011(3): 63-66. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26]	吕洪九. 新型高效肥料施用对水稻根系发育及产量的影响[J]. 农村经济与科技, 2022, 33(18): 44-46.
	LÜ H J. Effects of new high-efficiency fertilizer application on root development and yield of rice[J]. Rural Economy and Science-Technology, 2022, 33(18): 44-46. (in Chinese)
[27]	蒿呈龙, 姚继刚, 屈天元, 等. 不同类型新型肥料在水稻生产上应用效果的研究[J]. 农业与技术, 2020, 40(10): 65-69.
	HAO C L, YAO J G, QU T Y, et al. Study on the application effect of different types of new fertilizers on rice production[J]. Agriculture and Technology, 2020, 40(10): 65-69. (in Chinese)
[28]	徐淑英. 新型肥料对水稻福香占产量及米质的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2023, 29(3): 109-111.
	XU S Y. Effects of new fertilizations on yield and grain quality of rice variety Fuxiangzhan[J]. China Rice, 2023, 29(3): 109-111. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[29]	宋伟丰, 韦庆慧, 刘凯, 等. 芸苔素甾醇复配磷酸二氢钾对耐盐碱水稻产量影响的研究[J]. 现代农药, 2022, 21(2): 62-64.
	SONG W F, WEI Q H, LIU K, et al. Study on the effect of the mixture of brasszinoszteroid and potassium dihydngen phosphate on saline-tolerant rice yield[J]. Modern Agrochemicals, 2022, 21(2): 62-64. (in Chinese with English abstract)

品种 Variety	处理 Treatment	干物质积累量 Dry matter accumulation/(kg·hm^-2)		抽穗后干物质积累量 Dry matter accumulation after heading/ (kg·hm^-2)	茎叶干物质转运量 Transport volume of dry matter from stem and leaves/ (kg·hm^-2)	茎叶干物质转运率 Transport rate of dry matter from stem and leaves/%	对籽粒贡献率 Contribution rate to grains/%
品种 Variety	处理 Treatment	齐穗期 Full heading stage	成熟期 Mature stage	抽穗后干物质积累量 Dry matter accumulation after heading/ (kg·hm^-2)			对籽粒贡献率 Contribution rate to grains/%
T1	F2P1	13 103.20 b	18 089.27 b	4 986.07 c	3 224.97 a	28.67 a	32.04 a
	F2P2	13 844.17 a	21 972.65 a	8 128.48 a	2 457.6b c	20.76 d	19.51 d
	F1P1	11 381.32 d	17 271.93 d	5 890.61 b	2 275.54 c	23.20 c	23.37 c
	F1P2	11 933.95 c	17 876.67 c	5 942.72 b	2 648.60 b	25.78 b	25.84 b
T2	F2P1	14 163.57 b	18 341.08 b	4 177.50 c	3 760.06 a	30.80 b	37.97 a
	F2P2	14 553.66 a	20 113.52 a	5 559.86 a	3 651.70 a	30.06 b	31.43 b
	F1P1	10 637.26 d	14 056.24 d	3 418.99 d	3 002.07 b	33.85 a	36.65 a
	F1P2	12 183.69 c	16 974.72 c	4 791.02 b	2 803.40 b	27.04 c	29.77 b
T3	F2P1	10 274.51 c	16 934.98 b	6 660.47 a	1 328.17 d	15.75 c	13.51 c
	F2P2	12 746.90 a	19 626.94 a	6 880.03 a	2 314.24 b	21.68 b	20.49 b
	F1P1	9 789.48 d	15 557.79 d	5 768.32 b	1 672.86 c	20.20 b	18.69 b
	F1P2	11 830.75 b	16 421.05 c	4 590.30 c	3 285.86 a	32.97 a	33.73 a
T4	F2P1	10 500.52 b	18 887.51 b	8 387.00 b	1 029.93 a	11.42 a	9.45 a
	F2P2	11 118.68 a	21 795.15 a	10 676.47 a	488.65 b	5.23 b	3.77 b
	F1P1	7 830.75 d	16 091.85 d	8 261.09 b	236.33 c	3.48 bc	2.48 b
	F1P2	8 772.96 c	17 047.47 c	8 274.51 b	236.84 c	3.17 c	2.41 b
T5	F2P1	9 913.83 b	14 892.16 b	4 978.33 c	2 856.55 a	35.09 a	29.72 a
	F2P2	10 534.57 a	20 502.58 a	9 968.01 a	324.04 c	3.74 c	2.67 c
	F1P1	7 208.98 d	13 166.67 c	5 957.69 b	267.80 c	4.58 c	3.53 c
	F1P2	8 259.54 c	12 592.36 d	4 332.82 d	1 406.60 b	20.92 b	19.32 b
T6	F2P1	11 520.64 b	19 577.40 a	8 056.76 a	1 889.06 c	19.57 d	15.98 d
	F2P2	13 004.64 a	18 256.97 b	5 252.32 c	3 557.79 a	34.21 b	31.16 b
	F1P1	8 617.13 d	12 175.44 d	3 558.31 d	2 664.09 b	36.55 a	35.26 a
	F1P2	9 059.86 c	14 712.59 c	5 652.73 b	2 062.44 c	27.29 c	22.37 c

品种 Variety	处理 Treatment	干物质积累量 Dry matter accumulation/(kg·hm^-2)		抽穗后干物质积累量 Dry matter accumulation after heading/ (kg·hm^-2)	茎叶干物质转运量 Transport volume of dry matter from stem and leaves/ (kg·hm^-2)	茎叶干物质转运率 Transport rate of dry matter from stem and leaves/%	对籽粒贡献率 Contribution rate to grains/%
品种 Variety	处理 Treatment	齐穗期 Full heading stage	成熟期 Mature stage	抽穗后干物质积累量 Dry matter accumulation after heading/ (kg·hm^-2)			对籽粒贡献率 Contribution rate to grains/%
T1	F2P1	13 103.20 b	18 089.27 b	4 986.07 c	3 224.97 a	28.67 a	32.04 a
	F2P2	13 844.17 a	21 972.65 a	8 128.48 a	2 457.6b c	20.76 d	19.51 d
	F1P1	11 381.32 d	17 271.93 d	5 890.61 b	2 275.54 c	23.20 c	23.37 c
	F1P2	11 933.95 c	17 876.67 c	5 942.72 b	2 648.60 b	25.78 b	25.84 b
T2	F2P1	14 163.57 b	18 341.08 b	4 177.50 c	3 760.06 a	30.80 b	37.97 a
	F2P2	14 553.66 a	20 113.52 a	5 559.86 a	3 651.70 a	30.06 b	31.43 b
	F1P1	10 637.26 d	14 056.24 d	3 418.99 d	3 002.07 b	33.85 a	36.65 a
	F1P2	12 183.69 c	16 974.72 c	4 791.02 b	2 803.40 b	27.04 c	29.77 b
T3	F2P1	10 274.51 c	16 934.98 b	6 660.47 a	1 328.17 d	15.75 c	13.51 c
	F2P2	12 746.90 a	19 626.94 a	6 880.03 a	2 314.24 b	21.68 b	20.49 b
	F1P1	9 789.48 d	15 557.79 d	5 768.32 b	1 672.86 c	20.20 b	18.69 b
	F1P2	11 830.75 b	16 421.05 c	4 590.30 c	3 285.86 a	32.97 a	33.73 a
T4	F2P1	10 500.52 b	18 887.51 b	8 387.00 b	1 029.93 a	11.42 a	9.45 a
	F2P2	11 118.68 a	21 795.15 a	10 676.47 a	488.65 b	5.23 b	3.77 b
	F1P1	7 830.75 d	16 091.85 d	8 261.09 b	236.33 c	3.48 bc	2.48 b
	F1P2	8 772.96 c	17 047.47 c	8 274.51 b	236.84 c	3.17 c	2.41 b
T5	F2P1	9 913.83 b	14 892.16 b	4 978.33 c	2 856.55 a	35.09 a	29.72 a
	F2P2	10 534.57 a	20 502.58 a	9 968.01 a	324.04 c	3.74 c	2.67 c
	F1P1	7 208.98 d	13 166.67 c	5 957.69 b	267.80 c	4.58 c	3.53 c
	F1P2	8 259.54 c	12 592.36 d	4 332.82 d	1 406.60 b	20.92 b	19.32 b
T6	F2P1	11 520.64 b	19 577.40 a	8 056.76 a	1 889.06 c	19.57 d	15.98 d
	F2P2	13 004.64 a	18 256.97 b	5 252.32 c	3 557.79 a	34.21 b	31.16 b
	F1P1	8 617.13 d	12 175.44 d	3 558.31 d	2 664.09 b	36.55 a	35.26 a
	F1P2	9 059.86 c	14 712.59 c	5 652.73 b	2 062.44 c	27.29 c	22.37 c

品种 Variety	处理 Treatment	有效穗数 Effective panicle number/(10⁴ hm^-2)	结实率 Seed setting rate/%	千粒重 1 000-grain weight/g	穗粒数 Kernel number per spike	产量 Yield/ (kg·hm^-2)	收获指数 Harvest index
T1	F2P1	281.59 b	93.62 a	23.56 b	158.97 c	9 352.75 c	0.55 b
	F2P2	297.33 a	91.74 b	24.37 a	189.98 a	11 964.41 a	0.57 a
	F1P1	251.87 c	93.33 a	23.52 b	175.66 b	9 201.78 c	0.56 a
	F1P2	250.76 c	91.72 b	23.73 b	190.20 a	9 830.08 b	0.55 b
T2	F2P1	210.02 b	86.39 d	26.68 ab	254.08 b	11 653.24 b	0.56 b
	F2P2	223.04 a	94.58 a	26.97 a	232.18 d	12 512.04 a	0.60 a
	F1P1	164.82 d	90.67 c	26.47 b	235.40 c	8 820.36 d	0.57 b
	F1P2	178.32 c	92.50 b	26.30 b	260.70 a	10 715.57 c	0.53 c
T3	F2P1	217.37 c	91.51 c	24.36 b	208.25 c	9 559.86 c	0.61 a
	F2P2	243.63 a	96.32 a	24.83 a	217.25 a	11 988.76 a	0.59 b
	F1P1	214.05 c	93.51 b	24.45 ab	193.91 d	8 991.45 d	0.56 c
	F1P2	228.54 b	95.39 a	24.29 b	214.54 b	10 758.72 b	0.59 b
T4	F2P1	222.44 a	94.38 a	27.86 a	193.34 c	10 708.85 b	0.60 b
	F2P2	220.04 a	92.79 ab	27.78 a	218.54 a	11 743.74 a	0.61 ab
	F1P1	168.79 c	92.08 b	27.58 ab	208.48 b	8 536.30 c	0.62 a
	F1P2	201.80 b	93.40 ab	27.30 b	218.41 a	10 645.41 b	0.60 b
T5	F2P1	228.54 b	84.28 c	23.56 a	227.65 d	9 784.84 b	0.57 c
	F2P2	243.19 a	89.48 a	23.70 a	253.89 b	12 405.74 a	0.59 b
	F1P1	146.73 d	88.65 a	23.61 a	250.13 c	7 276.97 d	0.61 a
	F1P2	156.97 c	86.11 b	23.52 a	260.75 a	7 848.21 c	0.60 a
T6	F2P1	208.55 b	85.28 c	27.66 a	191.95 b	8 946.98 b	0.57 c
	F2P2	231.75 a	91.33 b	27.55 a	191.15 b	10 561.57 a	0.60 a
	F1P1	163.40 d	93.22 a	26.75 b	196.55 a	7 586.94 d	0.59 b
	F1P2	188.62 c	92.10 ab	27.08 b	181.41 c	8 085.43 c	0.60 ab

品种 Variety	处理 Treatment	有效穗数 Effective panicle number/(10⁴ hm^-2)	结实率 Seed setting rate/%	千粒重 1 000-grain weight/g	穗粒数 Kernel number per spike	产量 Yield/ (kg·hm^-2)	收获指数 Harvest index
T1	F2P1	281.59 b	93.62 a	23.56 b	158.97 c	9 352.75 c	0.55 b
	F2P2	297.33 a	91.74 b	24.37 a	189.98 a	11 964.41 a	0.57 a
	F1P1	251.87 c	93.33 a	23.52 b	175.66 b	9 201.78 c	0.56 a
	F1P2	250.76 c	91.72 b	23.73 b	190.20 a	9 830.08 b	0.55 b
T2	F2P1	210.02 b	86.39 d	26.68 ab	254.08 b	11 653.24 b	0.56 b
	F2P2	223.04 a	94.58 a	26.97 a	232.18 d	12 512.04 a	0.60 a
	F1P1	164.82 d	90.67 c	26.47 b	235.40 c	8 820.36 d	0.57 b
	F1P2	178.32 c	92.50 b	26.30 b	260.70 a	10 715.57 c	0.53 c
T3	F2P1	217.37 c	91.51 c	24.36 b	208.25 c	9 559.86 c	0.61 a
	F2P2	243.63 a	96.32 a	24.83 a	217.25 a	11 988.76 a	0.59 b
	F1P1	214.05 c	93.51 b	24.45 ab	193.91 d	8 991.45 d	0.56 c
	F1P2	228.54 b	95.39 a	24.29 b	214.54 b	10 758.72 b	0.59 b
T4	F2P1	222.44 a	94.38 a	27.86 a	193.34 c	10 708.85 b	0.60 b
	F2P2	220.04 a	92.79 ab	27.78 a	218.54 a	11 743.74 a	0.61 ab
	F1P1	168.79 c	92.08 b	27.58 ab	208.48 b	8 536.30 c	0.62 a
	F1P2	201.80 b	93.40 ab	27.30 b	218.41 a	10 645.41 b	0.60 b
T5	F2P1	228.54 b	84.28 c	23.56 a	227.65 d	9 784.84 b	0.57 c
	F2P2	243.19 a	89.48 a	23.70 a	253.89 b	12 405.74 a	0.59 b
	F1P1	146.73 d	88.65 a	23.61 a	250.13 c	7 276.97 d	0.61 a
	F1P2	156.97 c	86.11 b	23.52 a	260.75 a	7 848.21 c	0.60 a
T6	F2P1	208.55 b	85.28 c	27.66 a	191.95 b	8 946.98 b	0.57 c
	F2P2	231.75 a	91.33 b	27.55 a	191.15 b	10 561.57 a	0.60 a
	F1P1	163.40 d	93.22 a	26.75 b	196.55 a	7 586.94 d	0.59 b
	F1P2	188.62 c	92.10 ab	27.08 b	181.41 c	8 085.43 c	0.60 ab

柯杈肥与功能肥复配对杂交稻生长与产量的影响

Effects of branch fertilizer and functional fertilizer on growth and yield of hybrid rice

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 29

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	陈宇眺, 闫川, 洪晓富, 宋佳谕. 分蘖期淹水对常规粳稻生长特性、产量形成与钾素吸收的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(9): 1990-1999.
[2]	闵江艳, 唐卓磊, 杨雪, 黄小燕, 黄凯丰, 何佩云. 不同干旱-复水模式对苦荞生长与产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(9): 2000-2009.
[3]	高国际, 龙玲, 宋晓云, 李彦彤, 刘高强, 丁功涛. 亮斑扁角水虻幼虫代替豆粕对北京鸭生长发育和血清生化指标的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(8): 1764-1772.
[4]	潘志军, 吴小文, 吴晨阳, 程驭, 陈龙, 张晓红, 张进山, 周兵, 江波, 张文静, 车钊, 宋贺. 皖中不同类型再生稻品种产量与温光资源利用特征分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(7): 1492-1501.
[5]	李慧, 谭晓琴, 唐茜, 杨洋, 陈玮. 疏花对紫嫣茶树产量及品质成分的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(7): 1602-1615.
[6]	胡铁军. 化肥减量配施微生物肥对西蓝花产量品质与土壤性质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(7): 1657-1665.
[7]	许立婷, 齐广平, 康燕霞, 银敏华, 马彦麟, 贾琼, 汪精海, 姜渊博. 调亏灌溉对苜蓿产量品质效应的荟萃分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(6): 1256-1269.
[8]	朱学慧, 谢辉, 韩守安, 王敏, 白世践, 马云龙, 王艳蒙, 麦斯乐, 潘明启, 张雯. 两种植物生长调节剂对无核白鸡心葡萄果实品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(6): 1309-1319.
[9]	赵黎明, 王亚新, 蒋文鑫, 段绍彪, 沈雪峰, 郑殿峰, 冯乃杰. 植物生长调节剂对优质粳稻产量、品质与光合特性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(5): 1003-1014.
[10]	高虎, 穆晓国, 李海俊, 高富成, 张莹, 李建设, 叶林. 粉垄耕作对坝地土壤特性及甘蓝产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(5): 1113-1123.
[11]	陈俊霖, 蒋娜, 刘鑫, 卓红, 田昌, 韩永亮, 张玉平, 荣湘民. 控释氮肥减量对作物产量、氮素吸收与径流损失的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(4): 846-858.
[12]	俞瑞鲜, 胡秀卿, 柳新菊, 汤涛, 吴珉, 吴声敢, 赵学平. 亚致死剂量氰戊菊酯对家蚕生长发育的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(2): 264-271.
[13]	张旭娟, 周历萍, 俞可欣, 柴伟国, 潘念, 傅潇霞, 施建军. 绿芦笋品种间产量及主要营养成分周年变化测定[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(10): 2238-2246.
[14]	刘智成, 严良文, 陈瑶瑶, 欧雪婷. 福建地区不同栽培模式下百香果的产量与品质特征[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(1): 134-147.
[15]	张博, 刘泽慈, 汪洁, 李兆壮, 李录山, 胡琳莉, 郁继华. 不同农业废弃物肥料化配方对露地甘蓝生长、产量及品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(8): 1782-1792.