吉林省水稻生产的碳足迹与水足迹时空变化特征

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2021.06.02

浙江农业学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (6): 974-983.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2021.06.02

吉林省水稻生产的碳足迹与水足迹时空变化特征

张惠云(), 秦丽杰^*(), 贾利

东北师范大学地理科学学院,吉林长春 130024

收稿日期:2020-11-05 出版日期:2021-06-25 发布日期:2021-06-25
作者简介:*秦丽杰,E-mail: qinlj953@nenu.edu.cn
张惠云(1994—),女,河北保定人,硕士,主要从事水资源与水环境方面的研究。E-mail: zhanghy966@nenu.edu.cn
通讯作者: 秦丽杰
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(2019YFC0409101);国家自然科学基金(41571526);国家自然科学基金重点项目(41630749)

Temporal and spatial characteristics of carbon footprint and water footprint in rice production in Jilin Province

ZHANG Huiyun(), QIN Lijie^*(), JIA Li

School of Geographical Sciences, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China

Received:2020-11-05 Online:2021-06-25 Published:2021-06-25
Contact: QIN Lijie

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

农业生产对全球气候变暖、水资源短缺和环境污染具有重要影响。碳足迹和水足迹分别是评估温室气体排放和水资源消耗的指标。采用生命周期评价方法,对吉林省水稻生产的碳足迹和水足迹进行核算,分析碳足迹和水足迹的时空变化特征及其构成。结果表明:2007—2017年吉林省水稻生产的碳足迹年均值为0.74 kg·kg^-1。甲烷排放是水稻生产碳足迹的主要组分,占比为41.55%,其次为化肥施用导致的温室气体排放,占比为21.18%。2007—2017年吉林省水稻生产的水足迹呈波动下降趋势,年均值为147 L·kg^-1,其中:水稀缺足迹为122 L·kg^-1,约占83%,水劣化足迹为25 L·kg^-1,约占17%。碳足迹和水足迹的高值区和低值区在空间上分布不一致,吉林省西部和中部地区的水足迹较大、碳足迹较小,而东部、中东部地区碳足迹较大、水足迹较小。相关分析表明,碳足迹和水足迹呈负相关。

关键词: 水稻, 碳足迹, 水足迹, 时空特征

Abstract:

Agricultural production has an important impact on global warming, water scarcity and environment pollution. Carbon footprint (CF) and water footprint (WF) are indicators for evaluating greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and water consumption, respectively. Based on the life cycle assessment method, we calculated the CF and WF in rice production, and analyzed the temporal and spatial characteristics and composition of the CF and WF in Jilin Province. The results showed that the CF fluctuated from 2007 to 2017, with an annual average value of 0.74 kg·kg^-1. Methane emission from rice fields was the main source of CF in rice production, accounting for 41.55%, followed by GHG emissions caused by fertilizer applications, accounting for 21.18%. From 2007 to 2017, the WF showed a fluctuating downward trend, with an annual average value of 147 L·kg^-1, of which the water scarcity footprint (WSF) was 122 L·kg^-1, accounting for about 83%, and the water degradation footprint (WDF) was 25 L·kg^-1, accounting for about 17%. The spatial differences of rice WF and CF in Jilin Province were obvious. The areas with higher WF were found in the western and central regions of Jilin Province, while the areas with higher CF were found in the eastern and central eastern regions of Jilin Province. Correlation analysis showed that CF and WF were negatively correlated.

Key words: rice, carbon footprint, water footprint, spatio-temporal characteristics

中图分类号:

S181.3

张惠云, 秦丽杰, 贾利. 吉林省水稻生产的碳足迹与水足迹时空变化特征[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(6): 974-983.

ZHANG Huiyun, QIN Lijie, JIA Li. Temporal and spatial characteristics of carbon footprint and water footprint in rice production in Jilin Province[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(6): 974-983.

图/表 9

图1 吉林省区域划分图

Fig.1 Geographical zoning of Jilin Province

图2 研究的系统边界

Fig.2 System boundary of present study

表1 水稻生产中不同农业投入的排放因子

Table 1 Emission coefficients of different emission sources from agricultural inputs in rice production

排放源 Emission source	排放因子 Emission coefficient	参考文献 Reference
水稻种子Rice seeds/(kg·kg^-1)	1.84	Ecoinvent 2.2
农膜Plastic film/(kg·t^-1)	22.72	Ecoinvent 2.2
柴油Diesel oil/(kg·L^-1)	1.035	CLCD v0.7
柴油燃烧	4.768	CLCD v0.7
Diesel combustion/(kg·L^-1)
氮肥N fertilizer/(kg·kg^-1)	7.759	[18]
磷肥P fertilizer/(kg·kg^-1)	2.332	[18]
钾肥K fertilizer/(kg·kg^-1)	0.66	[18]
灌溉耗电	0.776 9	[19]
Electricity for irrigation/(kg·kWh^-1)
农药Pesticide/(kg·kg^-1)	18.04	[20]

图3 2007—2017年吉林省水稻生产温室气体排放总量、单位面积温室气体排放量和碳足迹的年际变化

Fig.3 Chronic trend of total greenhouse gas emission, greenhouse gas emission per unit area and carbon footprint in rice production in Jilin Province during 2007-2017

图4 2007—2017年吉林省水稻生产碳足迹及其变化率的空间分布

Fig.4 Distribution of carbon footprint and its trend in rice production in Jilin Province during 2007-2017

图5 2007—2017年水稻生产碳足迹的组分比例

Fig.5 Proportion of different components of carbon footprint in rice production in Jilin Province during 2007-2017

图6 2007—2017年吉林省水稻生产水足迹、水稀缺足迹和水劣化足迹的年际变化

Fig.6 Chronic trend of water footprint, water scarcity footprintandwater degradation footprint in rice production in Jilin Province during 2007-2017

图7 2007—2017年吉林省水稻生产水足迹、水稀缺足迹、水劣化足迹及其变化率的空间分布

Fig.7 Distribution of water footprint (WF), water scarcity footprint (WSF), water degradation footprint (WDF) and their trends in rice production in Jilin Province during 2007-2017

图8 吉林省水稻生产碳足迹和水足迹的关系

Fig.8 Relationship between carbon footprint and water footprint in rice production in Jilin Province

参考文献 33

[1]	郑晓雪, 秦丽杰. 不同降水年型吉林省中部玉米生产水足迹研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019,31(5):695-703.
	ZHENG X X, QIN L J. Water footprint of maize production in middle Jilin under different rainfall years[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2019,31(5):695-703.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]	Change Intergovernmental Panel on Climate. Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change[M]. Cambridge,UK: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
[3]	国家统计局. 中国统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2018.
[4]	董红敏, 李玉娥, 陶秀萍, 等. 中国农业源温室气体排放与减排技术对策[J]. 农业工程学报, 2008,24(10):269-273.
	DONG H M, LI Y E, TAO X P, et al. China greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural activities and its mitigation strategy[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2008,24(10):269-273.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]	中华人民共和国水利部. 2019年中国水资源公报[EB/OL]. [2020-11-05]. http://www.zjnyxb.cn/journalx_nyxb/manuscript/Manuscript!view.action?id=28166732103&tgcthave=false.
[6]	中华人民共和国气候变化第二次两年更新报告[EB/OL]. [2020-11-05]. http://big5.mee.gov.cngatebig5/www.mee.gov.cnywgzydqhbh/wsqtkz/201907/P020190701765971866571.pdf.
[7]	陈中督, 李凤博, 冯金飞, 等. 长江下游地区稻麦轮作模式碳足迹研究: 基于生命周期评价[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2019,40(12):81-90.
	CHEN Z D, LI F B, FENG J F, et al. Study on carbon footprint for rice-wheat rotation system in the lower reaches of Yangtze River: based on the life cycle assessment[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2019,40(12):81-90.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	ALDAYA M M, CHAPAGAIN A K, HOEKSTRA A Y, et al. The water footprint assessment manual[M]. London, UK: Routledge, 2012.
[9]	PFISTER S, BOULAY A M, BERGER M, et al. Understanding the LCA and ISO water footprint: a response to Hoekstra (2016) “A critique on the water-scarcity weighted water footprint in LCA”[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2017,72:352-359. DOI URL
[10]	BERGER M, FINKBEINER M. Methodological challenges in volumetric and impact-oriented water footprints[J]. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2013,17(1):79-89. DOI URL
[11]	XIAO G M, ZHAO Z C, LIANG L, et al. Improving nitrogen and water use efficiency in a wheat-maize rotation system in the North China Plain using optimized farming practices[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2019,212:172-180. DOI URL
[12]	徐长春, 黄晶, RIDOUTT B G, 等. 基于生命周期评价的产品水足迹计算方法及案例分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2013,28(5):873-880.
	XU C C, HUANG J, RIDOUTT B G, et al. LCA-based product water footprinting and a case study[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2013,28(5):873-880.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]	CHENG K, YAN M, NAYAK D, et al. Carbon footprint of crop production in China: an analysis of National Statistics data[J]. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 2015,153(3):422-431. DOI URL
[14]	CHU Y M, XIE L Y, YUAN Z J. Composition and spatiotemporal distribution of the agro-ecosystem carbon footprint: a case study in Hebei Province, North China[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018,190:838-846. DOI URL
[15]	杨文娟, 赵荣钦, 张战平, 等. 河南省不同产业碳水足迹效率研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019,34(1):92-103.
	YANG W J, ZHAO R Q, ZHANG Z P, et al. Industrial carbon and water footprint efficiency of Henan Province based on input-output analysis[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2019,34(1):92-103.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]	MUNGKUNG R, PENGTHAMKEERATI P, CHAICHANA R, et al. Life cycle assessment of Thai organic Hom Mali rice to evaluate the climate change, water use and biodiversity impacts[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019,211:687-694. DOI URL
[17]	LI H Y, QIN L J, HE H S. Characteristics of the water footprint of rice production under different rainfall years in Jilin Province, China[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2018,98(8):3001-3013.
[18]	陈舜, 逯非, 王效科. 中国氮磷钾肥制造温室气体排放系数的估算[J]. 生态学报, 2015,35(19):6371-6383.
	CHEN S, LU F, WANG X K. Estimation of greenhouse gases emission factors for China’s nitrogen, phosphate, and potash fertilizers[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015,35(19):6371-6383.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]	省级温室气体清单编制指南(试行)[EB/OL]. [2020-11-05]. http://www.cbcsd.org.cn/sjk/nengyuan/standardhome20140113/download/shengjiwenshiqiti.pdf.
[20]	WEST T O, MARLAND G. A synjournal of carbon sequestration, carbon emissions, and net carbon flux in agriculture: comparing tillage practices in the United States[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2002,91(1/2/3):217-232.
[21]	PFISTER S, KOEHLER A, HELLWEG S. Assessing the environmental impacts of freshwater consumption in LCA[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2009,43(11):4098-4104. DOI URL
[22]	杜玲, 徐长春, 吴尧, 等. 河北省种植业水污染足迹初报[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2018,37(2):286-293.
	DU L, XU C C, WU Y, et al. Water degradation footprint of crop production in Hebei Province[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2018,37(2):286-293.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]	吉林省第一次全国污染源普查公报[J]. 中国环境管理丛书, 2010(2):44-45.
	The first national survey of pollution sources in Jilin Province[J]. China Environmental Management, 2010(2):44-45.(in Chinese)
[24]	黄晓敏, 陈长青, 陈铭洲, 等. 2004—2013年东北三省主要粮食作物生产碳足迹[J]. 应用生态学报, 2016,27(10):3307-3315.
	HUANG X M, CHEN C Q, CHEN M Z, et al. Carbon footprints of major staple grain crops production in three provinces of Northeast China during 2004-2013[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016,27(10):3307-3315.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[25]	王兴, 赵鑫, 王钰乔, 等. 中国水稻生产的碳足迹分析[J]. 资源科学, 2017,39(4):713-722.
	WANG X, ZHAO X, WANG Y Q, et al. Assessment of the carbon footprint of rice production in China[J]. Resources Science, 2017,39(4):713-722.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[26]	ZHANG G, WANG X K, ZHANG L, et al. Carbon and water footprints of major cereal crops production in China[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018,194:613-623. DOI URL
[27]	米松华, 黄祖辉, 朱奇彪, 等. 稻田温室气体减排成本收益分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2016,28(4):707-716.
	MI S H, HUANG Z H, ZHU Q B, et al. Cost-benefit assessment for greenhouse gas mitigation in rice-based agriculture[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2016,28(4):707-716.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[28]	ZHANG Y, HUANG K, RIDOUTT B G, et al. Comparing volumetric and impact-oriented water footprint indicators: case study of agricultural production in Lake Dianchi Basin, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2018,87:14-21. DOI URL
[29]	ZHENG X X, QIN L J, HE H S. Impacts of climatic and agricultural input factors on the water footprint of crop production in Jilin Province, China[J]. Sustainability, 2020,12(17):6904. DOI URL
[30]	朱凤婷, 李奥, 于晓曼, 等. 有机与常规培肥模式生产水稻的碳足迹[J]. 生态学杂志, 2020,39(7):2233-2241.
	ZHU F T, LI A, YU X M, et al. Carbon footprint of rice production under organic and conventional fertilization modes[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2020,39(7):2233-2241.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[31]	WANG L, LI L Q, CHENG K, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of environmental footprints of regional crop production: a case study of Chizhou City, China[J]. Ecological Economics, 2019,164:106360. DOI URL
[32]	张瑞喜, 宋日权, 程争鸣, 等. 内蒙古扎赉特旗水稻节水灌溉试验研究[J]. 节水灌溉, 2019(3):27-29.
	ZHANG R X, SONG R Q, CHENG Z M, et al. Study on the water saving irrigation of rice in Jalaid County of Inner Mongolia[J]. Water Saving Irrigation, 2019(3):27-29.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[33]	孙广友, 李红艳, 罗新正. 轻度苏打盐碱地水稻高效节水灌溉模式及制度与高效洗碱-超高产组合试验研究[J]. 吉林师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2019,40(2):120-128.
	SUN G Y, LI H Y, LUO X Z. Combination experiment and study on high efficient irrigation model-system with high efficient of washing soda and super high yield of rice in mild soda saline-alkali soil[J]. Jilin Normal University Journal (Natural Science Edition), 2019,40(2):120-128.(in Chinese with English abstract)

吉林省水稻生产的碳足迹与水足迹时空变化特征

Temporal and spatial characteristics of carbon footprint and water footprint in rice production in Jilin Province

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 9

参考文献 33

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	祁慧博, 季鹏, 郑巧儿, 赵婧, 龙飞. 中国农村居民食物消费碳足迹的时空格局与驱动因素[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(9): 1991-2002.
[2]	裴惠民, 巫明明, 翟荣荣, 叶靖, 金月, 朱仪, 侯建军, 朱国富, 叶胜海. 低镉水稻基因功能与新品种培育研究进展[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(9): 2012-2020.
[3]	谭诗逸, 俞国红, 薛向磊, 赵颖雷, 许宝玉, 张成浩. 工厂化水稻育秧盘搬运装置设计与试验[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(7): 1545-1555.
[4]	张智, 何豪豪, 郁妙, 许剑锋. 化肥减量配施土壤改良剂对土壤酸度、土壤养分和水稻产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(6): 1301-1308.
[5]	林小兵, 黎江, 成艳红, 王斌强, 何绍浪, 黄尚书, 黄欠如. 不同有机物料对土壤微生物生物量、矿质氮含量与水稻产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(6): 1309-1318.
[6]	苏扬, 商小兰, 钱忠明, 吴林根, 黄佳琦, 庄海峰, 赵宇飞, 党洪阳, 徐立军. 腐熟剂与生物炭协同强化秸秆还田对土壤质量和水稻生长的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(5): 1139-1148.
[7]	应永飞, 韩东轩, 孟芳, 俞遴, 沈佳栾, 汪开英. 沼液替代化肥对水稻产量、品质和土壤特性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(4): 880-891.
[8]	崔宁波, 肖扬, 杨佳利, 王婷. 东北黑土区耕地生态承载力时空分异与可持续性分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(4): 954-964.
[9]	宋欣录, 范书红, 武桄旗, 展梦琪, 侯倩, 李明月, 徐艳. 铜-菲复合污染对分蘖期水稻根系生理特性和污染物积累的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(3): 521-529.
[10]	雷志伟, 李新欣, 徐恒, 张恒, 朱英, 张华. 利用染色体片段替换系鉴定水稻二化螟抗性QTL[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(3): 530-537.
[11]	谢昶琰, 金雨濛, 张苗, 董青君, 李青, 纪力, 钟平, 陈川, 章安康. 利用河道淤泥开发机插水稻秧苗营养土及其应用效果[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(3): 538-547.
[12]	兰雪成, 赵凤亮, 张光旭, 李杨, 郭晓红. 纳米氧化锌和纳米氧化硅对水稻种子萌发的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(2): 269-277.
[13]	李建强, 魏倩倩, 刘晓霞, 张均华, 朱春权. 优化施肥措施对水稻产量和土壤养分平衡的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(2): 438-446.
[14]	韩笑, 刘旭杰, 石吕, 张晋, 单海勇, 石晓旭, 严旖旎, 刘建, 薛亚光. 麦秸行间集覆还田下控释氮肥减施对水稻产量、品质与氮肥利用率的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(1): 1-13.
[15]	吴浩峰, 林朝阳, 沈志成. 耐草甘膦和啶嘧磺隆的转基因水稻研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(9): 1957-1968.